[Commentary] [USA] Transcending a ‘transgression’
Stephanie Stevens
Transcending a ‘transgression’
Girl Scouts face opposition from traditionalists over accepting a
transgender child
By Katherine Boyce On February 23, 2012
The name Girl Scouts brings to mind all sorts of images, from
camaraderie and togetherness to cookies and the cute little girls who
sell them. One aspect of the Girl Scouts that often gets overlooked by
those with no connection to the organization is its inclusiveness,
especially in the face of redefining gender.
This time of year, Girl Scouts all over the country begin to occupy
spots on the sidewalk and sell cookies—but this year, the
all-inclusive policy of the organization is being questioned by one of
its own, threatening the cookie sales.
A teen girl scout identified only as Taylor is urging a nationwide
boycott of Girl Scout cookies. The reason for a girl scout turning
against her own? The acceptance of a transgender child into the Girl
Scouts.
The Girl Scouts pride themselves on being all-inclusive, allowing
anyone who identifies as a girl to join the troupes. Seven-year-old
Bobby Montoya, the child in question, was originally told by the troop
leader in Colorado that she could not join simply because she is
biologically male. However, the Girl Scouts of Colorado overrode this
and allowed her to join on the grounds that she identifies as a girl,
despite her biology.
Unfortunately, this California-based girl scout Taylor does not share
the same values as the organization to which she belongs. Advocating
for an all-girl environment within the organization, Taylor appears to
believe that the girls’ safety is compromised with the addition of
someone who is not biologically female.
A video posted by a Houston-based group called Honest Girl Scouts,
which works to ensure that “traditional values” are taught by the Girl
Scouts, depicts the 14-year-old Taylor telling viewers her views on
the issue.
The argument of safety does not necessarily prove Taylor’s point,
seeing as a transgender child bears no threat to others based on her
transgendered status alone. A child seven years of age is hardly
threatening and no different from other children.
However, Taylor and the Honest Girl Scouts are not the only ones using
safety as an argument. Three Louisiana-based leaders resigned in
December because of the controversial decision to accept Montoya into
a Colorado troop. One of those who resigned also called Montoya’s
acceptance a dangerous situation, much like Taylor did.
Furthermore, the all-girl environment of the organization for which
Taylor advocates is hardly compromised by the acceptance of a child
who may not be biologically female but identifies as a girl and, for
all intents and purposes, is one. A girl born with the body of a
boy—who likely wants nothing more than to be treated like any other
girl—hardly warrants a boycott of the Girl Scouts’ wares.
The money from the sale of cookies makes up a large portion of the
funds that support the Girl Scouts. In her video, Taylor appears to be
opposed to the organization making this money because of how
all-inclusive and open-minded it is.
By saying that the profit made from cookie sales is “promoting the
desires of a small handful of people,” Taylor is voicing the opinion
of the Honest Girl Scouts organization.
In 2008, the Girl Scouts designed a new curriculum with new books. By
including sex education, environmental activism and other liberal
causes, Girl Scouts USA must have incurred the wrath of conservatives
at some point. The money that went into this is part of the argument
that only “a small handful of people” benefit from the profit of the
cookie sales.
The Honest Girl Scouts website is mostly full of anger at the
pro-abortion and sex-education path that the Girl Scouts are taking.
Naturally, these are the same kinds of people who would get angry at
the inclusion of a transgender child for no reason other than that it
is not traditional. Little do most of them realize that the “small
handful of people” benefiting from the decisions of the Girl Scouts is
in reality a rather large handful, if not the majority.
The point of having the Girl Scouts sell their signature cookies is to
show girls from a young age how to be responsible, sell things, make
money, count change, etc. The organization is meant to be a learning
experience.
Taylor, who is apparently dissatisfied enough with the Girl Scouts’
all-inclusive policy that she is bent on ruining the learning
experience of her fellow scouts, must not have learned what she needed
to as part of an all-inclusive group, despite being part of the Girl
Scouts for eight years and counting.
Because the times are changing, the Girl Scouts have rightfully taken
a more modern approach to their curriculum. The role of women is no
longer what the Honest Girl Scouts seems to believe it is.
There is nothing wrong with what the Girl Scouts try to do. There is
nothing wrong with teaching girls sex education and promoting freedom,
and it is not wrong to give girls an education that goes deeper than
the traditional set of skills.
The boycott of Girl Scout cookies that Taylor and the Honest Girl
Scouts are encouraging has to do with more than the acceptance of a
transgender child, though that was clearly the last straw for people
like Taylor. However, this will likely not be the last time that a
transgender child will join the Girl Scouts.
Transgender children deserve to be treated like all other children,
and the arguments presented by Taylor in her video have more to do
with her personal bias than with a real problem.
No matter what opinions there are about transgender children joining
an all-girl organization, the boycott of Girl Scout cookies will
surely not change the Girl Scouts’ curriculum or the fact that there
is now a transgender child among them. This is how it is, and a
transgender girl cannot be blamed for wanting to do what many other
girls do freely.
© The Portland State Vanguard 2011
http://psuvanguard.org/opinion/transcending-a-transgression/