Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
[USA] Massachusetts Toothless Transgender Law Goes Into Force Sunday
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  2 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Stephanie Stevens  
View profile  
 More options Jul 1 2012, 9:44 am
From: Stephanie Stevens <stephaniekaystev...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 09:44:06 -0400
Local: Sun, Jul 1 2012 9:44 am
Subject: [Blog/Commentary] [USA] Massachusetts Toothless Transgender Law Goes Into Force Sunday
planetransgender, USA

Saturday, June 30, 2012

Massachusetts Toothless Transgender Law Goes Into Force Sunday

Fail. Caved. Gave up. All these terms come to mind when considering
the Massachusetts Transgender Equal Rights law
<http://www.malegislature.gov/Laws/SessionLaws/Acts/2011/Chapter199>
that does not protect transgender peoples right to be in public
places. Why would I condemn a law many see as a step forward? Because
on the ground, unemployed or in the workplace, this law means squat.

Perception is 99% of social Conscript. The haters won. Sure they
aren't celebrating openly, we are still alive after all.

Point to consider. Im September of last year I was hired to work in a
warehouse in a small Texas town. Its a huge state of the art
electronics distributor, a place you might assume to have enlightened
people employed.

The second day I was there I learned of a rumor that I was seen using
the men's room. The next thing I knew I was being questioned by HR as
to whether hiring me had been a good idea. It's been a uphill battle
since then with myself continually having to be on the defensive,
essentially fighting for my life.

Employment revolves around public accommodations. Without a job having
housing or credit protections doesn't mean mean jack shit.

No high falutin lawyer came to my defense even if they could have. But
there are Lawyers who defend the Transgender Equal Rights In
Massachusetts: Likely Broader Than You Think
<http://www.bostonbar.org/pub/bbj/bbj_online/bbj1112/spring2012/Heads-...>
.

I am not a lawyer but the reality for Massachusetts transgender people
in Public Accommodations is this. The public now knows for some reason
unlike any minority before you, you were judged unworthy, unequal and
untrusted enough not to be thought of as fully human. Not to be
granted the same dignity.

I'd rather die than live a life so judged.

Posted by Kelli Busey at 9:59 PM

http://planetransgender.blogspot.com/2012/06/massachusetts-toothless-...


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Stephanie Stevens  
View profile  
 More options Jul 3 2012, 10:32 am
From: Stephanie Stevens <stephaniekaystev...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 10:32:34 -0400
Local: Tues, Jul 3 2012 10:32 am
Subject: [Blog/Commentary] [USA] Massachusetts Toothless Transgender Law Goes Into Force Sunday
Women Born Transsexual, USA

Massachusetts Toothless Transgender Law Goes Into Force Sunday

07/02/2012 — Suzan

I’m kind of an incrementalist.  I try to see the positive in any
legislation that either protects oppressed minority groups or offers
them tools to make their lives easier.

I see any sort of trans-inclusive ENDA sort of legislation as positive
and tend to see a different set of short comings than those seen by my
friend, Kelli who lives on the other end of the Dallas/Fort Worth
Metroplex.

We have different concerns based on where we are at in life and how
society relates to us.

I might be concerned about discrimination that arises when ever a
company runs even a hundred dollar back ground check for anything
above an entry level position.  Kelli points out to me that many other
sister and I suspect a few brothers as well are having to deal with
bathroom issues, even in those entry level positions.

While I tend to believe in get what you can get and come back asking
for more others believe in one big push to get everything or at least
most of what you want in one big effort.

I can see the rationale behind either approach.  It is hard to
maintain activist group cohesion for multi-year efforts.  At the same
time we are living through an extremely reactionary era and struggles
tend to be prolonged.

Here’s Kelli’s take on the Massachusetts Law:

From Planet Transgender:
http://planetransgender.blogspot.com/2012/06/massachusetts-toothless-...

By Kelli Busey
June 30, 2012

Reposted with permission

Fail. Caved. Gave up. All these terms come to mind when considering
the Massachusetts Transgender Equal Rights law
<http://www.malegislature.gov/Laws/SessionLaws/Acts/2011/Chapter199>
that does not protect transgender peoples right to be in public
places. Why would I condemn a law many see as a step forward? Because
on the ground, unemployed or in the workplace, this law means squat.

Perception is 99% of social Conscript. The haters won. Sure they
aren’t celebrating openly, we are still alive after all.

Point to consider. In September of last year I was hired to work in a
warehouse in a small Texas town. Its a huge state of the art
electronics distributor, a place you might assume to have enlightened
people employed.

The second day I was there I learned of a rumor that I was seen using
the men’s room. The next thing I knew I was being questioned by HR as
to whether hiring me had been a good idea. It’s been a uphill battle
since then with myself continually having to be on the defensive,
essentially fighting for my life.

Employment revolves around public accommodations. Without a job having
housing or credit protections doesn’t mean mean jack shit.

No high falutin’ lawyer came to my defense even if they could have.
But there are Lawyers who defend the Transgender Equal Rights In
Massachusetts: Likely Broader Than You Think
<http://www.bostonbar.org/pub/bbj/bbj_online/bbj1112/spring2012/Heads-...>
.

I am not a lawyer but the reality for Massachusetts transgender people
in Public Accommodations is this. The public now knows for some reason
unlike any minority before you, you were judged unworthy, unequal and
untrusted enough not to be thought of as fully human. Not to be
granted the same dignity.

I’d rather die than live a life so judged.

http://womenborntranssexual.com/2012/07/02/massachusetts-toothless-tr...


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »