we are watching it ... and did also a small comparison. the outcome is
that for the moment we stay with trac/rss-readers/eclipse mylin. for
us the main reason for staying is: trac wiki wysiwyg, eclipse mylyn
integration, and most important, migration effort. but, to be honest,
we already have ruby installed, and are thinking of offering redmine
as additional option for our projects.
tracs advantages are:
* many plugins:
http://trac-hacks.org
* small usability advantages, like click on the roadmap bar, diff
viewer showing exactly what changed
sortable tables when displaying source, ...
* big usability things, liky wysiwyg wiki editor
* maturity: try "old milestones" in redmine, you wont get it
* eclipse integration with mylyn
* easy_install, including the plugins
beside the multiple project support, redmines advantages are a better
overview and the necessary things out of a box, and the quite fast
release cycles. there seem to be more source code checkins so one
could expect that these deficiencies will go away over time.
but, both of them do not have a general approach like ubuntus
launchpad, which has an excellent scalability for many projects, very
efficient duplicate check, blueprints for planning features including
a powerful moinmoin wiki. but it comes with the disadvantage that you
cannot download it, its not "wiki everywhere", and the tracking down
to the source code change is not that obvious.
rupert.
On Mar 16, 3:35 pm,
deba...@debian.org wrote:
> Hi,
>
> has anybody in the trac community compared trac with redmine?
>
> One user did a change from trac to redmine and is pleased about
> multi project support and better git integration:
>
>
http://changelog.complete.org/posts/701-At-long-last,-software.comple...