Received: by 10.205.122.65 with SMTP id gf1mr645986bkc.2.1335771908692;
        Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: trac-users@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.204.154.67 with SMTP id n3ls611640bkw.3.gmail; Mon, 30 Apr
 2012 00:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.157.134 with SMTP id b6mr1282954bkx.5.1335771895417;
        Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.157.134 with SMTP id b6mr1282953bkx.5.1335771895405;
        Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <roger.oberholt...@gmail.com>
Received: from stockholm.opq.se ([213.88.151.150])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p5si1606486bks.1.2012.04.30.00.44.55
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 213.88.151.150 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of roger.oberholt...@gmail.com) client-ip=213.88.151.150;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 213.88.151.150 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of roger.oberholt...@gmail.com) smtp.mail=roger.oberholt...@gmail.com
Received: from [10.2.10.41] (acme.pacific [10.2.10.41])
	by stockholm.opq.se (8.13.4/8.13.4/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id q3U7iqQb001936
	for <trac-users@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:44:54 +0200
Subject: General update question
From: Roger Oberholtzer <roger.oberholt...@gmail.com>
To: trac-users@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:44:52 +0200
Message-ID: <1335771892.15813.28.camel@acme.pacific>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I have almost 60 extensions from TracHack installed on my Trac system.
Keeping them up-to-date is a bit of work. I am curious if anyone has
settled on a good way to (1) find out which installed things have
updates available and (2) install updates in some easy fashion.

The most interesting thing is #1. Just knowing that there is a update
available is the most time consuming part. I am not sure I would want
them to be upgraded just because an update is available. So #2 is
probably less interesting.

Just curious...


-- 
Roger Oberholtzer