The other is the discussion about the trendiness ( and predicted short
life span) of some currently popular online applications which have
been likened by some to popular TV programs which are eventually
replaced by something else. I guess the question is whether the
popularity of a particular application with our students would make it
a more effective delivery tool and how much we should consider it's
popularity with the learners before implementing it, or in a networked
environment do learners make these decisions for themselves? I
couldn't find the original link that got me going on this so here is a
list of fads from the 1990's from wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1990s_fads_and_trends
Are there parallels?
Peter Enderby
I reckon accept the learners will make the decison in whta they want to
use for themselves, advocate multiple web 2.0 tools that do the same
thing but MUST follow open standards, hmmm how to legitimise this
premise this within an organisation.
Interstingly it seems Microsoft have advocated open ID and google well
they have their own proprietry system it seems ha ha ha
http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/19/technorati-announces-support-for-open-id/
http://web2debate.wikispaces.com/Guidelines+for+using+Blogs+and+Wikis
Peter Enderby
www.networklearning.blogspot.com
Skype: stevenraymondparker
"Half of what you know today will be obsolete in five years. That prospect
should fill you with excitement." -Vimala Blavatsky
Peter Enderby