Subject: Netanyahu set up another illegal Zionist settlement, this time on White House lawn. And, it appears, Obama has agreed to serve as its armed guard.
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. to fill the moral and intellectual blanks but
neglects his advice: "The chain reaction of evil... wars producing more wars...
must be broken, or we shall be plunged into the dark abyss of annihilation."
There is something fundamentally wrong with the American thought process on the
War on Terrorism and the emerging conflict with Iran. David Perez ("Imagine",
Information Clearing House, 02/2009), attempts to set out the humanistic
concerns:
"Imagine being in a room of maimed, deformed and tortured Iraqis, Afghans and
Palestinians, [and Pakistanis, altogether over 1 million of them] accompanied by
widows and orphans [over 4 million of them] mourning because their entire family
has been exterminated. I imagine this roomful of walking dead sitting around
while my friends and I discuss how "realistic" we in the U.S. must be with our
electoral politics, how our expectations need to "practical," how peace is just
so damn "complicated." .. imagine these victims looking at us with blank,
scarred faces as we congratulate ourselves for selecting a new President who
talks about "our God-given right to lead," about our duty to spread U.S.-style
democracy throughout the globe, and how we are now just so "proud to be
American."
"Imagine these charred visitors with missing limbs bowing their heads and
wondering if they should somehow envy us for always finding a way to celebrate
and party and bask in our entertainment-soaked culture - even when it comes to
our "handsome" President being sworn in at the same time their homes were being
incinerated, courtesy of our state-of-the-art weaponry. Perhaps these
"unfortunate" sufferers will understand that we can't prosecute our own war
criminals, because, you see, we simply "have to move on." And maybe they'll
understand that not one U.S. leader has ever - ever - called our bombings and
invasions a terrorist act...May be they'll understand us when we shake our heads
and say, "Well, this is just how politics work here. Sure it's corrupt but,
hell, what can we do?"
From: Subject: Global Peace and Security: President Obama and Mankind at Crossroads
Critical analysis of the current global affairs:
"Global Peace and Security: President Obama and Mankind at Crossroads"
Global Peace and Security: President Obama and Mankind at Crossroads
Mahboob A. Khawaja, PhD.
The Obama's presidency was seen as a fantasy to the centuries old white legacy
of the White House. The power and its glorification associated with the White
House have not resulted in any ground breaking discoveries even after Obama's
entry to the Washington landscape. The crucial challenge Obama faces is how to
cope with change and adaptability to a New Beginning that he envisaged but
betrayed by conscientious compromise to ensure his own political survival. Paul
Craig Roberts called him "The World's Least Powerful Man - the Obama Puppet."
Obama did not pave the way to hell for the unwanted wars but found it already
paved by George Bush to keep on solo walking to entrapment - the Madness of
Unthinking. Politics is a game of new and creative ideas not a fixed entity or
an end to itself. Those who perceive "points of no return" and scramble "red
lines" indulge in self-geared acts of absurdity and can hardly relate to the
contemporary informed global intellect and changing priorities of the mankind,
open and flexible to change and futuristic developments. On all of his major
policy statements and strategic intents from the immediate closing of the
Guantanmobay Terrorism Headquarters, the end of two bogus wars, the lobbyists
dominated politics, re-approaching diplomacy and outreach to normalization of
relations with the Muslim world, President Obama got glued to the form and
forgot the essence of meaning and purpose for which he won the election - "Yes
We Can." Most politicians do read Machiavelli's Prince to perform at the
political theatre. On the election night 2008, Obama spoke of "remaking America"
but while accepting the wishful Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo and argued not for
much needed peacemaking to end the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, but he defended
the Bushism of waging aggressive wars against the poor and destitute nations out
of the scope of the US animosity radar. George Bush and his neo-conservatives
warmongers invested heavily to make America morally, politically and financially
bankrupt by waging the bogus wars on terrorism. There was a strategy in No
Strategy after the 9/11 events to demonstrate to the fearful American masses
that some forceful measures and foreign war engagements will be on the active
Bush's agenda to protect the US security interests. The ultimate aims of the
wars on terrorism were to create more terrorism and to destabilize those nations
having reservoirs of untapped oil and gas resources and to crop up new markets
for the American corporations to sell more arms and weapons.
To spotlight the cruelty of the on-going wars of terrorism for fun and
enjoyment, Gordon Duff ("The Baggage of America Extremism: No Enemy, No
Negotiation, Only the Dead are Real", ICH, December 16, 2009), outlines the
dilemma: "We had become addicted to the "black and white" version of Bushitism
to the extent that we, as a nation, have given up thought entirely. We know we
can't win. Do we expect an army of angels to come down from heaven, the ones
Cheney, Bush and Rumsfeld dreamed of, or are we going to start acting like a
world leader again."
Obama's politics does not generate any creative enthusiasm as was perhaps
anticipated during his first presidential election campaign. In times of crises
and adversity, he appears confused to face the facts of life and global affairs
but always willing to strike backdoor compromises if the Israeli lobbyists
insist on his role-play. To a reputable international journalist, Robert
Dreyfuss ("Obama: 'I Have Met Israel and It Is "Us"' ICH- the Nation
7/12/2010), Obama will even surrender the White House to entice the Israeli
interest more so in a presidential election year:
-"Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu set up another illegal Jewish settlement,
this time on the White House lawn. And, it appears, President Obama has agreed
to serve as its armed guard. So complete was Obama's identification with Israel
yesterday that he actually referred to Israel as "us" before correcting himself:
"We strongly believe that, given its size, its history, the region that it's in,
and the threats that are leveled against us-against it, that Israel has unique
security requirements."
It is not the Audacity of Hope but consequential dictate of history when nations
and leaders violate the Laws of God, and challenge the limits of reason; they
end-up in self defeat and destruction. If diplomacy was the foremost choice to
search for feasible political accommodation, President Obama did not bother to
use it; instead he continued the Bush dictum of insanity in Iraq and
Afghanistan. "Negotiations cannot convince al-Qaida's leaders to lay down their
arms," In his Oslo Nobel Peace Prize speech, President Obama claimed: "to say
that force is sometimes necessary is not a call to cynicism, it is recognition
of history." History offers a learning role that you could not comprehend it.
History shall judge you Mr Obama by your actions, not claims. With escalating
war efforts and additional troops to kill more innocent civilians and disturb
the Afghan graveyards, you have kept the insane momentum to airlift more men and
material to Afghanistan and that does not signal peacemaking at all. After the
American failure in Iraq, You want to conquer Afghanistan and Pakistan to
maintain the Bush contracted gas and oil pipelines that sound against the Nature
of Things and it is not going to happen in the foreseeable future. The
consequences are yet to come.
There is something fundamentally wrong with the American thought process on the
War on Terrorism and the emerging conflict with Iran. David Perez ("Imagine",
Information Clearing House, 02/2009), attempts to set out the humanistic
concerns:
"Imagine being in a room of maimed, deformed and tortured Iraqis, Afghans and
Palestinians, accompanied by widows and orphans mourning because their entire
family has been exterminated. I imagine this roomful of walking dead sitting
around while my friends and I discuss how "realistic" we in the U.S. must be
with our electoral politics, how our expectations need to "practical," how peace
is just so damn "complicated." .. imagine these victims looking at us with
blank, scarred faces as we congratulate ourselves for selecting a new President
who talks about "our God-given right to lead," about our duty to spread
U.S.-style democracy throughout the globe, and how we are now just so "proud to
be American."
America could have learnt from the despotic Europeans who fought and killed
millions during the two world wars before settling in at the EU tables to define
their religious unity and common economic and political interests. Those who
conspired animosity and conducted the warmongering against the mankind of which
they were a part, are long buried in graveyards and not available for
accountability. Surely, they knew how to escape the dictate of history and now
the futuristic European generations are pretending to be civilized after having
been in the dark ages for centuries. Recently, one 111 years old British soldier
- the last remaining WW1 British veteran made it clear before dying (BBC,
10/2009), "we don't know why we fought and killed other fellow human beings.
Wars do not seem to solve any problem." One wonders, why human beings fight
with their fellow human beings. Edward Glover (War, Sadism and Pacifism) noted:
"human beings
...
Subject: Netanyahu set up another illegal Zionist settlement, this time on White House lawn. And, it appears, Obama has agreed to serve as its armed guard.
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. to fill the moral and intellectual blanks but
neglects his advice: "The chain reaction of evil... wars producing more wars...
must be broken, or we shall be plunged into the dark abyss of annihilation."
There is something fundamentally wrong with the American thought process on the
War on Terrorism and the emerging conflict with Iran. David Perez ("Imagine",
Information Clearing House, 02/2009), attempts to set out the humanistic
concerns:
"Imagine being in a room of maimed, deformed and tortured Iraqis, Afghans and
Palestinians, [and Pakistanis, altogether over 1 million of them] accompanied by
widows and orphans [over 4 million of them] mourning because their entire family
has been exterminated. I imagine this roomful of walking dead sitting around
while my friends and I discuss how "realistic" we in the U.S. must be with our
electoral politics, how our expectations need to "practical," how peace is just
so damn "complicated." .. imagine these victims looking at us with blank,
scarred faces as we congratulate ourselves for selecting a new President who
talks about "our God-given right to lead," about our duty to spread U.S.-style
democracy throughout the globe, and how we are now just so "proud to be
American."
"Imagine these charred visitors with missing limbs bowing their heads and
wondering if they should somehow envy us for always finding a way to celebrate
and party and bask in our entertainment-soaked culture - even when it comes to
our "handsome" President being sworn in at the same time their homes were being
incinerated, courtesy of our state-of-the-art weaponry. Perhaps these
"unfortunate" sufferers will understand that we can't prosecute our own war
criminals, because, you see, we simply "have to move on." And maybe they'll
understand that not one U.S. leader has ever - ever - called our bombings and
invasions a terrorist act...May be they'll understand us when we shake our heads
and say, "Well, this is just how politics work here. Sure it's corrupt but,
hell, what can we do?"
From: Subject: Global Peace and Security: President Obama and Mankind at Crossroads
Critical analysis of the current global affairs:
"Global Peace and Security: President Obama and Mankind at Crossroads"
Global Peace and Security: President Obama and Mankind at Crossroads
Mahboob A. Khawaja, PhD.
The Obama's presidency was seen as a fantasy to the centuries old white legacy
of the White House. The power and its glorification associated with the White
House have not resulted in any ground breaking discoveries even after Obama's
entry to the Washington landscape. The crucial challenge Obama faces is how to
cope with change and adaptability to a New Beginning that he envisaged but
betrayed by conscientious compromise to ensure his own political survival. Paul
Craig Roberts called him "The World's Least Powerful Man - the Obama Puppet."
Obama did not pave the way to hell for the unwanted wars but found it already
paved by George Bush to keep on solo walking to entrapment - the Madness of
Unthinking. Politics is a game of new and creative ideas not a fixed entity or
an end to itself. Those who perceive "points of no return" and scramble "red
lines" indulge in self-geared acts of absurdity and can hardly relate to the
contemporary informed global intellect and changing priorities of the mankind,
open and flexible to change and futuristic developments. On all of his major
policy statements and strategic intents from the immediate closing of the
Guantanmobay Terrorism Headquarters, the end of two bogus wars, the lobbyists
dominated politics, re-approaching diplomacy and outreach to normalization of
relations with the Muslim world, President Obama got glued to the form and
forgot the essence of meaning and purpose for which he won the election - "Yes
We Can." Most politicians do read Machiavelli's Prince to perform at the
political theatre. On the election night 2008, Obama spoke of "remaking America"
but while accepting the wishful Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo and argued not for
much needed peacemaking to end the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, but he defended
the Bushism of waging aggressive wars against the poor and destitute nations out
of the scope of the US animosity radar. George Bush and his neo-conservatives
warmongers invested heavily to make America morally, politically and financially
bankrupt by waging the bogus wars on terrorism. There was a strategy in No
Strategy after the 9/11 events to demonstrate to the fearful American masses
that some forceful measures and foreign war engagements will be on the active
Bush's agenda to protect the US security interests. The ultimate aims of the
wars on terrorism were to create more terrorism and to destabilize those nations
having reservoirs of untapped oil and gas resources and to crop up new markets
for the American corporations to sell more arms and weapons.
To spotlight the cruelty of the on-going wars of terrorism for fun and
enjoyment, Gordon Duff ("The Baggage of America Extremism: No Enemy, No
Negotiation, Only the Dead are Real", ICH, December 16, 2009), outlines the
dilemma: "We had become addicted to the "black and white" version of Bushitism
to the extent that we, as a nation, have given up thought entirely. We know we
can't win. Do we expect an army of angels to come down from heaven, the ones
Cheney, Bush and Rumsfeld dreamed of, or are we going to start acting like a
world leader again."
Obama's politics does not generate any creative enthusiasm as was perhaps
anticipated during his first presidential election campaign. In times of crises
and adversity, he appears confused to face the facts of life and global affairs
but always willing to strike backdoor compromises if the Israeli lobbyists
insist on his role-play. To a reputable international journalist, Robert
Dreyfuss ("Obama: 'I Have Met Israel and It Is "Us"' ICH- the Nation
7/12/2010), Obama will even surrender the White House to entice the Israeli
interest more so in a presidential election year:
-"Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu set up another illegal Jewish settlement,
this time on the White House lawn. And, it appears, President Obama has agreed
to serve as its armed guard. So complete was Obama's identification with Israel
yesterday that he actually referred to Israel as "us" before correcting himself:
"We strongly believe that, given its size, its history, the region that it's in,
and the threats that are leveled against us-against it, that Israel has unique
security requirements."
It is not the Audacity of Hope but consequential dictate of history when nations
and leaders violate the Laws of God, and challenge the limits of reason; they
end-up in self defeat and destruction. If diplomacy was the foremost choice to
search for feasible political accommodation, President Obama did not bother to
use it; instead he continued the Bush dictum of insanity in Iraq and
Afghanistan. "Negotiations cannot convince al-Qaida's leaders to lay down their
arms," In his Oslo Nobel Peace Prize speech, President Obama claimed: "to say
that force is sometimes necessary is not a call to cynicism, it is recognition
of history." History offers a learning role that you could not comprehend it.
History shall judge you Mr Obama by your actions, not claims. With escalating
war efforts and additional troops to kill more innocent civilians and disturb
the Afghan graveyards, you have kept the insane momentum to airlift more men and
material to Afghanistan and that does not signal peacemaking at all. After the
American failure in Iraq, You want to conquer Afghanistan and Pakistan to
maintain the Bush contracted gas and oil pipelines that sound against the Nature
of Things and it is not going to happen in the foreseeable future. The
consequences are yet to come.
There is something fundamentally wrong with the American thought process on the
War on Terrorism and the emerging conflict with Iran. David Perez ("Imagine",
Information Clearing House, 02/2009), attempts to set out the humanistic
concerns:
"Imagine being in a room of maimed, deformed and tortured Iraqis, Afghans and
Palestinians, accompanied by widows and orphans mourning because their entire
family has been exterminated. I imagine this roomful of walking dead sitting
around while my friends and I discuss how "realistic" we in the U.S. must be
with our electoral politics, how our expectations need to "practical," how peace
is just so damn "complicated." .. imagine these victims looking at us with
blank, scarred faces as we congratulate ourselves for selecting a new President
who talks about "our God-given right to lead," about our duty to spread
U.S.-style democracy throughout the globe, and how we are now just so "proud to
be American."
America could have learnt from the despotic Europeans who fought and killed
millions during the two world wars before settling in at the EU tables to define
their religious unity and common economic and political interests. Those who
conspired animosity and conducted the warmongering against the mankind of which
they were a part, are long buried in graveyards and not available for
accountability. Surely, they knew how to escape the dictate of history and now
the futuristic European generations are pretending to be civilized after having
been in the dark ages for centuries. Recently, one 111 years old British soldier
- the last remaining WW1 British veteran made it clear before dying (BBC,
10/2009), "we don't know why we fought and killed other fellow human beings.
Wars do not seem to solve any problem." One wonders, why human beings fight
with their fellow human beings. Edward Glover (War, Sadism and Pacifism) noted:
"human beings
...
