Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Proposal - Group Wide Printer Test - Request...
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Renae MacLeod  
View profile  
 More options Sep 29 2012, 11:03 pm
From: Renae MacLeod <renae.macl...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 23:03:48 -0400
Local: Sat, Sep 29 2012 11:03 pm
Subject: RE: Proposal - Group Wide Printer Test - Request...

Object - Can I get some recommendations for a test object? All I've been
printing is printer parts, cats, and single wall cubes. I've not yet gotten into
any other calibration objects. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Either
attach the file you have or send a link to the file.

Material - Can everyone let me know their preferred material? I think that PLA
might be preferred since it's generally easier to get a warp free object, but
perhaps most people use ABS and/or most people think printing one in each
material is the way to go.

Thanks! J

From: Renae MacLeod [mailto:renae.macl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thu Sep 20, 2012 00.11
To: toronto-reprap@googlegroups.com
Subject: Proposal - Group Wide Printer Test

I would like to propose that we come up with (or find) an object (ideally a
single object) to compare each of our printers output. Something we can leave at
Site3. Material type and settings for walls, infill and etcetera should be
predefined. Time to build and per machine settings such as filament diameter,
build platform, raft/brim, and extruder temperature can be noted as well.

I think this would really help showcase each of our printers (especially the
strengths) and help to make overall print quality better for everyone.

Anyone interested in seeing and/or doing this?


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.