The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post will appear after it is approved by moderators
 |
From: "Miguel de Icaza" <miguel.de.ic...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 01:37:44 -0400
Local: Thurs, Sep 6 2007 1:37 am
Subject: Re: I tell you how does this look
* I think we'll all agree that this collaboration can be seen as part > of an strategy to gain acceptance in a flash dominated world. I've got I do not blame them. OOXML is a superb standard and yet, it has been > no problem with that if this kind of competition benefits the users.. > but why didn't Microsoft standarize Silverlight like they did with CLR > and C#? This make me think that all this collaboration is temporal. FUDed so badly by its competitors that serious people believe that there is something fundamentally wrong with it. This is at a time when OOXML as a spec is in much better shape than any other spec on that space. Besides, it is always better to have two implementations and then * Will you continue to develop a parallel batery of open source test > suite (like you have already) that are available not only to you but Yes, those are some of the practices that we believe are core to Mono. > also to other independent open source developers? * What about microsoft patents? If I create my own linux distro or I > use a distro that is not mainstream or just doesn't have a deal with Not as long as you get/download Moonlight from Novell which will include > the daemon.. err Microsoft.. like Novell has.. Will I have to suffer > the shadow of Microsoft patents over Silverlight when using or > developing Moonlight? patent coverage. Miguel You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||