Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Standalone Silverlight Applications on 17 Apr 2008
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  8 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post will appear after it is approved by moderators
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Oran  
View profile  
 More options Apr 17 2008, 4:10 pm
From: Oran <odenni...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:10:08 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Apr 17 2008 4:10 pm
Subject: Standalone Silverlight Applications on 17 Apr 2008
Perfect timing.  At our local Microsoft "Heroes Happen Here" event
yesterday I asked one of the guys presenting on Silverlight the
following question: "So when are we going to get the Silverlight out-
of-browser experience on platforms other than Linux?"

His response was "Use WPF," with another Microsoft presenter chipping
in with a comment about keeping the sales of Windows up.

Scott Guthrie accidentally let the Silverlight out-of-browser feature
slip out during his January '07 interview with Rory [1], but it seems
like they're backing off from that plan, especially with the codec
licensing terms for Moonlight.  That's too bad.  Maybe they're keeping
this feature reserved for when they need an extra boost, sort of like
Steve Jobs withholding the iPhone SDK for a year...

[1] http://channel9.msdn.com/showpost.aspx?postid=271984


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
blender3dl...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Apr 17 2008, 11:42 pm
From: blender3dl...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Apr 17 2008 11:42 pm
Subject: Standalone Silverlight Applications on 17 Apr 2008
I'll be working on an application that will run on top of this.  I'll
be looking at having a cross-platform solution too.
WCF udp is also needed as this is a Verse 3D protocol app.

Thank you for your work,

Jason Schluter


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
segphault  
View profile  
 More options Apr 17 2008, 7:30 pm
From: segphault <ryankp...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Apr 17 2008 7:30 pm
Subject: Re: Standalone Silverlight Applications on 17 Apr 2008
As I mentioned in my Adobe AIR review (http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/
post/20080303-first-look-breathe-in-the-air.html) AIR doesn't allow
you to expose native libraries or extend the runtime, which sets a
very low ceiling for scalability. You are pretty much stuck with what
you can code in ActionScript or JavaScript.

It's worth noting though that the folks at Adobe are working on fixing
this and have experimentally looked at creating a .NET bridge for AIR:
http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2008/01/17/commandproxy-net-air-inte...

I personally think that AIR has too many limitations to be useful for
large-scale application development, but what they really get right is
the application deployment model. Being able to install an application
on any platform with a single click is very compelling. It sounds like
minstall or something similar would be a great way to bring that
advantage to Moonlight.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
VanL  
View profile  
 More options Apr 18 2008, 8:31 am
From: VanL <van.lindb...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 05:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Apr 18 2008 8:31 am
Subject: Re: Standalone Silverlight Applications on 17 Apr 2008
This is a great idea.

One of the consistent criticisms of the Mono/Moonlight project is that
it is simply following Microsoft and giving some of their proprietary
technologies - including their a/v codecs - a toehold on the Linux
desktop.

The mopen functionality is a great chance to demonstrate the worth of
the Mono stack outside of what Microsoft is doing. Don't wait for
Microsoft to lead on this functionality. It should be ported so that
other stacks can use it as well. If it can get wide adoption,
Microsoft will be more likely to follow your lead. I think you
underestimate the power and influence that open source stacks can
have.

By the same token, standardize on freely available codecs. Make it so
that other platform-specific codecs *can* be called, but build in the
ogg/VC-2 functionality by default. Just like many games manufacturers
have standardized on OGG for patent reasons, give Silverlight
developers the chance to standardize on unencumbered a/v codecs.

One other idea - it may be worth looking into building the full-
functionality profile into a plugin for mozilla, like the pycomext
plugin. I know that there is already a plugin that gives access to the
silverlight profile. If would be very cool to allow xulrunner/prism
apps to use the full mono stack when creating their skins. XUL and
XAML aren't that far apart, and mozilla has already gone to the
trouble of opening up its dom for non-javascript languages. Why not
reuse that functionality?


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Miguel de Icaza  
View profile  
 More options Apr 18 2008, 11:17 pm
From: "Miguel de Icaza" <miguel.de.ic...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 23:17:53 -0400
Local: Fri, Apr 18 2008 11:17 pm
Subject: Re: Standalone Silverlight Applications on 17 Apr 2008

Hey,

As I mentioned in my Adobe AIR review (http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/

> post/20080303-first-look-breathe-in-the-air.html<http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080303-first-look-breathe-in-t...>)
> AIR doesn't allow
> you to expose native libraries or extend the runtime, which sets a
> very low ceiling for scalability. You are pretty much stuck with what
> you can code in ActionScript or JavaScript.

Ah, this is a great resource!

I personally think that AIR has too many limitations to be useful for

> large-scale application development, but what they really get right is
> the application deployment model. Being able to install an application
> on any platform with a single click is very compelling. It sounds like
> minstall or something similar would be a great way to bring that
> advantage to Moonlight.

So I take it there are no APIs for accessing the local file system, they
have not extended beyond the standard APIs that are available to Flash
developers?

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mateusz Kierepka (XNA MVP)  
View profile  
 More options Apr 20 2008, 10:13 am
From: "Mateusz Kierepka (XNA MVP)" <mate...@kierepka.pl>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 07:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Apr 20 2008 10:13 am
Subject: Standalone Silverlight Applications on 17 Apr 2008
Nice job! Do you plan to add SilverLight (moonlight) to MonoDevelop,
and add conversion tool for current SilverLight apps?

Kind regards from Poland
xna.pl/silverlight.aspx


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mateusz Kierepka (XNA MVP)  
View profile  
 More options Apr 20 2008, 10:13 am
From: "Mateusz Kierepka (XNA MVP)" <mate...@kierepka.pl>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 07:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Apr 20 2008 10:13 am
Subject: Standalone Silverlight Applications on 17 Apr 2008
Nice job! Do you plan to add SilverLight (moonlight) to MonoDevelop,
and add conversion tool for current SilverLight apps?

Kind regards from Poland
xna.pl/silverlight.aspx


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Miguel de Icaza  
View profile  
 More options Apr 23 2008, 12:47 am
From: "Miguel de Icaza" <miguel.de.ic...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:47:18 -0400
Local: Wed, Apr 23 2008 12:47 am
Subject: Re: Standalone Silverlight Applications on 17 Apr 2008

Hello Mateusz,

Nice job! Do you plan to add SilverLight (moonlight) to MonoDevelop,

> and add conversion tool for current SilverLight apps?

Yeah, the MonoDevelop team will be adding some Silverlight support to it.

As for the tool, I think it is a great idea!   We should look into that

Miguel.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2010 Google