Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
OOXML SDK on 22 Mar 2008
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  2 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post will appear after it is approved by moderators
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Kevin Daly  
View profile  
 More options Mar 22 2008, 4:20 pm
From: Kevin Daly <kevindal...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 13:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Mar 22 2008 4:20 pm
Subject: OOXML SDK on 22 Mar 2008
I agree with you that releasing it under the MS-PL licence would be
ideal.

It's possible they're nervous that if they don't keep type control
over it then mutant varieties will appear that don't conform with the
latest version of the spec - more likely it's just that their first
priority is to get something out there and they haven't given a lot of
thought to the non-Windows world.

From the first version I looked at (and logic also suggests this would
be the case) the OOXML SDK has a dependency on System.IO.Packaging
(from .NET 3.0), for the OPC stuff. Has that been implemented for Mono
yet? It doesn't look like it would be *too* much work, but that's easy
for me to say of course since I wouldn't be doing it and don't have to
juggle all the other priorities.

Have you tried contacting Eric White about this? (I don't have an
email address, but you could try http://blogs.msdn.com/ericwhite/contact.aspx).
Getting the SDK in the hands of Linux programmers seems like a good
way to promote the format, and also combat some of the FUD that's
floating around.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Miguel de Icaza  
View profile  
 More options Mar 23 2008, 1:56 pm
From: "Miguel de Icaza" <miguel.de.ic...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:56:47 -0400
Local: Sun, Mar 23 2008 1:56 pm
Subject: Re: OOXML SDK on 22 Mar 2008

Hey,

It's possible they're nervous that if they don't keep type control

> over it then mutant varieties will appear that don't conform with the
> latest version of the spec - more likely it's just that their first
> priority is to get something out there and they haven't given a lot of
> thought to the non-Windows world.

I suspect that its probably simpler, the group in charge of writing that
code has perhaps not even considered that option.   It would be good to get
in touch with the interested parties and laid down a case for why the MS-PL
for that code would be better.

From the first version I looked at (and logic also suggests this would

> be the case) the OOXML SDK has a dependency on System.IO.Packaging
> (from .NET 3.0), for the OPC stuff. Has that been implemented for Mono
> yet? It doesn't look like it would be *too* much work, but that's easy
> for me to say of course since I wouldn't be doing it and don't have to
> juggle all the other priorities.

System.IO.Packaging is a trivial piece of code.   It should not take long to
implement.

Have you tried contacting Eric White about this? (I don't have an

> email address, but you could try
> http://blogs.msdn.com/ericwhite/contact.aspx).
> Getting the SDK in the hands of Linux programmers seems like a good
> way to promote the format, and also combat some of the FUD that's
> floating around.

I agree;   Will drop him an email, and see if he can bring this issue up
with the management in charge of it.

Miguel


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google