The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Anelma <tuorepuriste...@gmail.com> wrote:I disagree- what's wrong with using brlcad, opencascade, pythonOCC,
> Bryan Bishop wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Anelma <tuorepuriste...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> We could agree on some annotations to be used to better encode intent and
>>> limits of the parameters
>> Sounds like you're reinventing the wheel. Just saying. :-)
> Well, making up a new language for openscad was definitely reinventing th
etc.? I think it would be better to use IGES or STEP with parametric
values, since you can convert from STEP/IGES to STL (makerbot output)
and also use the models in professional CAD environments too. With
STL, you just get a mesh, and so far nobody has made a parser that
goes from OpenSCAD to anything standard.
> Could you be more specific in what pre-existing wheel are you referring to?- Bryan
> Would be much more useful than "Just saying." =)
1 512 203 0507
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.