Alive hgtk (GTK) fork?

18 views
Skip to first unread message

Mihamina Rakotomandimby

unread,
Apr 25, 2012, 2:45:17 AM4/25/12
to thg...@googlegroups.com, mercurial
Hi all,

One day I found a hgtk (the GTK frontend, not the Qt one) fork,
non-official, but alive.
By alive I mean the fork is compatible with mercurial 1.8+.

My mercurial:
[mihamina@dell ~]$ hg --version
Mercurial Distributed SCM (version 1.9.3)

I lost the URL: Would some have it?

I'm running a full GTK environment, and the thg would be the only one to
introduce Qt dependency. I would like to stick with hgtk (GTK).

Or if you ever knew a GTK fronted of mercurial, similar in features to
Giggle (http://live.gnome.org/giggle) , I would be interested.

Thank you very much!

--
RMA.

Martin Geisler

unread,
Apr 25, 2012, 3:39:04 AM4/25/12
to Mihamina Rakotomandimby, thg...@googlegroups.com, mercurial, Henrik Stuart, Sune Foldager
Mihamina Rakotomandimby <miha...@rktmb.org> writes:

> Hi all,
>
> One day I found a hgtk (the GTK frontend, not the Qt one) fork,
> non-official, but alive.
> By alive I mean the fork is compatible with mercurial 1.8+.
>
> My mercurial:
> [mihamina@dell ~]$ hg --version
> Mercurial Distributed SCM (version 1.9.3)
>
> I lost the URL: Would some have it?

That could be this one by Henrik and Sune:

https://bitbucket.org/hstuart/hgtk

I'm using it with Mercurial 2.2-rc.

> I'm running a full GTK environment, and the thg would be the only one
> to introduce Qt dependency. I would like to stick with hgtk (GTK).
>
> Or if you ever knew a GTK fronted of mercurial, similar in features to
> Giggle (http://live.gnome.org/giggle) , I would be interested.

I think TortoiseHg does what Giggle does and more, doesn't it?

--
Martin Geisler

Mercurial links: http://mercurial.ch/

Mihamina Rakotomandimby

unread,
Apr 25, 2012, 3:46:37 AM4/25/12
to thg...@googlegroups.com
On 04/25/2012 10:39 AM, Martin Geisler wrote:
>> One day I found a hgtk (the GTK frontend, not the Qt one) fork,
>>> non-official, but alive.
>>> [...]

>>> I lost the URL: Would some have it?
> That could be this one by Henrik and Sune:
> https://bitbucket.org/hstuart/hgtk
> I'm using it with Mercurial 2.2-rc.

Yes! it is!

>>> Or if you ever knew a GTK fronted of mercurial, similar in features to
>>> Giggle (http://live.gnome.org/giggle) , I would be interested.
> I think TortoiseHg does what Giggle does and more, doesn't it?

It does, for sure.


--
RMA.

Steve Borho

unread,
Apr 25, 2012, 12:21:59 PM4/25/12
to thg...@googlegroups.com, Mihamina Rakotomandimby, mercurial, Henrik Stuart, Sune Foldager
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Martin Geisler <m...@lazybytes.net> wrote:
> Mihamina Rakotomandimby <miha...@rktmb.org> writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> One day I found a hgtk (the GTK frontend, not the Qt one) fork,
>> non-official, but alive.
>> By alive I mean the fork is compatible with  mercurial 1.8+.
>>
>> My mercurial:
>>   [mihamina@dell ~]$ hg --version
>>   Mercurial Distributed SCM (version 1.9.3)
>>
>> I lost the URL: Would some have it?
>
> That could be this one by Henrik and Sune:
>
>  https://bitbucket.org/hstuart/hgtk
>
> I'm using it with Mercurial 2.2-rc.

Hey guys, should I pull that into https://bitbucket.org/tortoisehg/hgtk ?

--
Steve Borho

Steve Borho

unread,
Apr 25, 2012, 2:27:37 PM4/25/12
to Henrik Stuart, thg...@googlegroups.com, Mihamina Rakotomandimby, mercurial, Henrik Stuart, Sune Foldager
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Henrik Stuart <h...@hstuart.dk> wrote:
> Hey Steve
>
> You're very welcome to pull it in. We're using the hgtk branch to track
> hg's stable branch and hgtk-default to track hg's default branch (more
> or less), except we're lagging somewhat behind on default.

Cool, thanks. I get periodic requests for this.

--
Steve Borho

Henrik Stuart

unread,
Apr 25, 2012, 1:46:39 PM4/25/12
to Steve Borho, thg...@googlegroups.com, Mihamina Rakotomandimby, mercurial, Henrik Stuart, Sune Foldager
On 2012-04-25 18:21, Steve Borho wrote:
Hey Steve

You're very welcome to pull it in. We're using the hgtk branch to track
hg's stable branch and hgtk-default to track hg's default branch (more
or less), except we're lagging somewhat behind on default.

--
Kind regards,
Henrik Stuart
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages