board disruption - The Authoritarians

Message from discussion board disruption
From:  will <billz.m...@yahoo.co.uk>
To:  The Authoritarians <theauthoritarians@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: board disruption
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 07:49:29 -0800
Message-ID: <1194623369.684738.121660@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <473373FA.7040803@bellsouth.net>
References: <1194540642.480288.323640@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
   <473373FA.7040803@bellsouth.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

My, what a wordy chap (chapess?). I wonder if what I read on my screen
is actually what he writes, because this computer has been illegally
hacked (is that a netspeak redundancy?). When first attempting contact
with the group I posted a message at the prof's guestbook ( The
Authoritarians Guestbook) dated 5th Nov. The word  'psychoanalysis'
was altered to read  'psycho***ysis'  mid-flight so to speak. Now one
can speculate on the interpretation of the missing 'anal' (and a
favourite 'friendly' control game is the invitation to interpret such
posturings), but hacked this computer is. Now I don't mind mentioning
this (and the message is still at the guestbook) because from past
experience secrecy will now take over (nasty publicity) and the
interference with the computer should stop. I will return with more
clarification I hope

On Nov 8, 8:39 pm, Mike Cothran <cothr...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> will wrote: <slowly I read, slowly I reply, swiftly I send, for I am
>
> fastman, err, fat man, oh drats, nevermind>
>
>    The total time snatched from my life to write this reply, proofread
> and edit, polish and publish, 45 minutes in small chunks of 5 minutes
> each over the last 3 hours as my daily tasks permitted. This was an easy
> task since I posited the format of remarks in the posters original post
> into the future for his reply to that posting of mine and had already
> worked out what I would say to any points he would make, sadly, there
> were too few points made with his reply and I see that I had wasted many
> seconds in my formulations in anticipation of his reply, I am a slow
> typist though, so my mind races ahead only to be dragged back on task.
>
>    Your subject "board disruption" tells me a lot about your outlook,
> but, firstly, this is not a forum, not a message board, nor anything
> like unto such, it is an email served list and though a repository for
> those posts exists within Google's Groups I can't think of one post we
> have seen which originated from that set of machines except yours. You
> get points for looking into the header of the posting for the name
> spelling of my last name. I see that billz.m...@yahoo.co.uk only appears
> within this small group notwithstanding your efforts to disrupt the life
> of many by the acts of one. I have no doubts as to the earnestness of
> your intent.
>
>  From the message headers I extract these details:
>    209.85.146.246 is your IPA the headers tell me, I know better, this
> is the IPA of a google machine from which the post came, "There is no
> need to blind the eyes of a man if he will not open them to the light."
>
>    Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; SU 3.004; .NET CLR
> 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
> seems to be the originator application of the post, again, this is only
> the machine from which the post came, it might not be your machine,
> although it implies your OS and level of BIOS advancement in your
> system. These are facts, indisputable at present but open to some
> speculation as to the 'realness' of them in some way or in some fashion.
> Much the same can be said of those things you write within the post you
> sent to the list server to which we are all subscribed.
>
>  > Hello 'friendly' mike cothran, oh yes you is (drat, there's my
> 'orrible english again).
>
>    Starting at the end, working back, do not lose you way in this reply.
>    'you is' seems to be in greater use than it was held to be in years
> past, although it is incorrect it does not detract from your ability to
> convey information to the members of this mailing list. Since your shift
> key does work, please, use that key rather than offer insult by its lack.
>    You also missed a comma, further lessons will cost you as you might
> expect, my fees will be discussed on confirmation of intent by you to
> pay in advance for time expended on your behalf.
>    Your assumption or assertion is in error, and yes, I have heard the
> old saw implying "Just because you are paranoid doesn't mean they are
> NOT out to get you," unfortunately this is not the case here, I fly in
> the face of your reasoning.
>
>  > I can smell your mob from a mile off.
>
>    That should be 'you mob', to be in proper dialect. You need to
> remember that switching locational idiom or speech origins within a
> single sentence is not good form and it tends to confuse the honest
> readers. This is your last free lesson, further responses from you must
> show you have learned the lessons to this point before they will be
> remarked upon, this will be true after you pay my fee as well, take
> heart. You have been warned, take heed.
>
> now on to the point you make
>    I am not friendly to most, I hold myself reserved more often than not
> with those displaying these patterns as you have presented (used in the
> clinical sense).
>
>  > Impersonation on the web is so much easier isn't it?
>
>   Again, you offer common insult to one before many, your wish to
> express yourself this way on this list expands into your 'real life'
> which then becomes more difficult to manage, you need to rethink your
> methods. Your assumption of prior acquaintance with myself is in error,
> I know you not --prior to your intrusion into my life via the posts you
> have made to this self selected subscription list you were unknown to
> myself although your views as expressed by yourself are most similar to
> those I have heard  in the past from "self proclaimed nut jobs"; whom am
> I impersonating since I am, indeed, can be no other than, myself, Will.
>    If I am not who I seem to be to others it is a failing on my part. I
> do try to honestly and actively represent myself as no more or less than
> I am at any given time but, like all endeavors humans attempt, a partial
> failure may have occurred which allows your misunderstanding, but I
> doubt that is the case here.
>
>  > Easier certainly than the clunky old voice frequency
> analysis/matching technology you use for 'phones.
>
>    Starting at the end, working back, do not lose you way in this reply.
>    There seems to be an extraneous apostrophe (used prior in this your
> posting to represent a missing h), am I to assume you intend to say
> hphones -- if so, did you mean headphones, rather. If, instead, you
> actually meant telephones, I must point you to the movie "The
> President's Analyst" for my take on TPC -- the potential for its
> regeneration today is greater than a sum zero estimate, i.e., AT&T's
> recent efforts and harmonizations with the US FCC, acquisitions of many
> of the BBs, and further efforts as well. As to your description of
> VFA/MT as clunky and old technology, when it is as portable as bubble
> gum will you be happy? Placed in the mouth, affecting all sounds emitted
> in what ever fashion, chewing sounds, slight sighs, involuntary snorts,
> gurgles and such... dream on, these contraptions do not exist as yet,
> anyone thinking this occurs everyday must feel extraordinarily
> exceptional, don't they Will; wakeup they are not out to get you, goad
> you, or even grow you. This assumption is not becoming on you. (OTPR #1)
>
>  > At least the re-education you've put on offer is an improvement, even
> if it is intended to ridicule and point out a moron.
>
>    Starting at the end, working back, do not lose you way in this reply.
>    I feel no need to point out morons, fools, or idiots, they do this
> work many times better than I. There is no basket hiding an idiot light,
> no screen door shielding us from an idiot wind, if this was coherent
> light powered by the winds they emit we would be in a sorry state, let
> me tell you.
>    If you feel ridiculed as a moron let me say, rather, maroon, al la
> Bugs Bunny of Loony Tunes fame on this side of the big pond. You need
> not trouble yourself with a reply to this or indeed, any, of the
> postings you read on this list if to do so you would feel further
> discontent, the list exists for the free exchange of opinions WRT the
> list name. My life experience allows me to pass on to you these things,
> further efforts on my behalf for you will only come with advance payment
> of my fee and for my time.
>    There is no offer, I made no such offer, I do however, this one
> additional time only, make further corrections to your thoughts and
> reasoning as expressed and show a willingness to point out deep errors
> in your basic thinking and reasoning, something many others might not
> do, no matter the level of eagerness in yourself to wish it so. Take heed!
>
>    I hope you will take to your chair and practice those lessons;
> improve yourself, no one else can do this for you, you can not hire it,
> you can not expect it without effort, sigh, you have not demonstrated
> any at all, yet. Change really does happen overnight, it is only in the
> practice of the new that the old diminishes but others can tell the
> change has occurred long before you are fully practiced and are well
> content with the change as you envisioned. Keep at it, practice,
> practice, practice, as all others must do, else you share the
> destination prestidigitation dictates, your will -- out of sight, and
> misdirected by your own desires to be so much different from others, so
> that you feel extraordinarily exceptional, so much more than just
> special -- there is no magic in that, Will.
>
>  > I'm not laying claim to brains as you well know, and
> disinformation/distraction campaigns are no deterrent.
>
>    Starting at the end, working back, do not lose you way in this reply.
>    If campaign were champaign we would all be drunk, you say this is
> such, I offer the following view, it is not, was not, and will never be
> so. You claim to know what exists in my mind "I'm not laying claim to
> brains as you well know", a shallow field you tarry to plough, rocky
> though it be, will yield no harvest, but damage only thee.
>
>  > Will this put off genuine people? We'll have to see.
>
>    Those intending to offer to this email list genuine, thoughtful,
> insightfully expressed views will continue as they have in the past
> without any regard for your point of view -- or mine. To think other
> than this is to swell yourself, or myself, with a noxious gas which is
> most foul to the nose and baneful to the free thinking, free wheeling,
> free living desirous to us all -- live free Will, no one wishes to trap
> you, not I, nor anyone on this list full of interesting, if sometimes
> unmoor'd, souls. (OTPR #2)
>
> an aside insert here
> _________________________
>    Needs must insert Obligatory Tim Powers References since I have now
> made my reply to your views contain rationalizations from "Last Call"
> [assumption the tarot card game to implying body switching as a means of
> impersonation, although mannerisms and speech patterns carry over from
> the original body and work against a true impersonation] as well as "On
> Stranger Tides," his pirate love story book [unmoor'd souls ever
> drifting, never anchored, drats, another OTPR, #3 now, this one from ...
>
> read more =BB