I have published a text that was initially a reply to 'Antimatter and
Zero Point Interconnected', but I think is showing also how questions
raise up that are not questions really but origin as you start from
wrong expressions someone else did. It's often to observe these days.

Important here was that it was know for decades now mass is not
necessarily bound on weight although it does not loose its integrity
expressed thru the obtaining of it's volume.

Here is the Text which also can be found at the zpenergy.com forum.

Hello!

As I see, you can't get on without my help. I have here again put some
thoughts explaining why the relativity theory is not to apply at all. I
think
this will take you closer to what you are up to. As I said I think
Einstein
was the best physicist on earth. It took me a while but you folks are
quite complicated.

But, therefore, Einstein did not say the components of his equation
have
to be bigger than 0 and positive the equation is invalid.

Although as we know today the nature is an other nature in space, on
the
moon, as sample, mass remains as it was in those different natures.

It remains in it's shape and keeps it's volume. It's got no weight in
space,
but this is more caused of the planets (earth) motion than of the
weightlessness in space or space itself. Mass keeping it's volume in
space
does prove this, as I think.

Mass is not taking a negative value in space and is not being, and will
not
being and was not less than 0.

Einstein did not mention this extra or mad some addition towards this
in
or belonging to the equation. Thus the equation cannot be applied if
mass
(or also an other component) was negative and so is invalid for
positive
and bigger than 0 still.

Steve

This text I think, furthermore the fact mass is getting it's volume and
not to have weight under some circumstances, proves it will not take up
a position which could be expressed as -m under a mathematical
perspective.

The only physical value after all I know that is doing so was
astonishingly acceleration. This as I think does imply, acceleration
can not be get as a spatial extension in some way but was measured at
the moment.