xiterm+thai: RFC for some advices from DD during build the 1.10-1 debian package

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Neutron Soutmun

unread,
Jan 6, 2012, 12:08:08 PM1/6/12
to thai-linux...@googlegroups.com
Dear all,

Since I have build the xiterm+thai_1.10-1 debian package and it's
already uploaded but still have some advices from Paul Wise (DD) as
the details below

Ref: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/01/msg00081.html (to
follow the threads)

=== 8< ===

On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Paul Wise <pa...@debian.org> wrote:

...
...
...

> A warning from configure:
>
> config.status: WARNING: 'Make.common.in' seems to ignore the
> --datarootdir setting

I will forward to upstream. <<< === RFC === >>>

...
...
...

> Some warnings from cppcheck:
>
> [test/graphics/qplot.c:120]: (error) Resource leak: fd
> [src/Xtensions/graphics/command.c:1028]: (error) Resource leak: ptyfd
> [src/command.c:1077]: (error) Resource leak: ptyfd
> [src/Xtensions/menubar+graphics/command.c:1030]: (error) Resource leak: ptyfd
>
> There are some duplicate files:
>
> src/Xtensions/graphics/graphics.h
> src/Xtensions/menubar+graphics/graphics.h
>
> src/Xtensions/graphics/graphics.c
> src/Xtensions/menubar+graphics/graphics.c

I will also forward to the upstream. <<< === RFC === >>>

> Please add a comment to the lintian overrides file explaining why
> setgid-binary has been overridden.

Sure, I will consult with upstream why it should overrides as it's
already overridden in the debian package since I have adopted. <<<
=== RFC === >>>

> How about including some things from debian/ upstream? Maybe inputrc
> txiterm txiterm.1 xiterm+thai.desktop?

Actually, the debian/ in the upstream repository is outdated. In the
past few years, I and the upstream have to sync the debian/ dir when
the current deb has been changed. But now I have maintained the deb in
git (Alioth) and consider the syncing debian/ dir with upstream is the
duplicate work. Therefore, I'll ask the upstream to drop the debian/
dir soon. <<< === RFC === >>>

=== 8< ===

Please add your comments for the "<<< === RFC === >>>" quotes.

Thanks in advance.

Best regards,
Neutron Soutmun

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages