Attached is about as far as I can go with the Governance/Service Management thing without your support/comments/rebukes.
The biggest changes from last weeks Draft(s), are
* Proposal requesting a "ICT Review Committee" to do the investigation and make the Plan/Stamp to go forward. * better organisation of the Background and Strategic Context with * hopefully more useful diagrams. * better explanations of the diagrams and relevance to the topic * better referencing? * use of colours?
I really need your feedback, especially negative ones.
* Defining IT Governance and IT Management o IT Governance: What o IT Management: How + IT as Technology Partner : IT Infrastructure Management + IT as Service Provider: IT Service Management + IT as Strategic Partner: IT Governance * What do we have today? * Is there a need for change? * Guiding Frameworks o IT Governance Frameworks o IT Service Management Frameworks o Guiding Frameworks - Summary * Organisation Structure for best IT Governance and IT Service Management o Organisation Structures for IT o IT Governance Structure o IT Service Management Structure - An extended look at a Federal IT Structure o Organisation Structure – Summary * Summary
As discussed, we need the minimal ICT Governance Framework for our National ICT Working Groups to go forward.
Alfred, your guidance please?
Robin/Fe'ao, can you read and I'll call in this afternoon or tomorrow morning for your comment.
A comment from a non-IT person if you don't mind. So as a non-IT, will be commenting on the structure of the report only. May I suggest incorporating Tonga's status such as the heading "what do we have today" into IT Governance or IT Management etc. where appropriate. Just think that once the reader is educated on what IT Governance is (for example) they can immediately relate it to Tonga and better understand what we should have but don't have etc.
Secondly, maybe have the summary for each section to be mentioned at the beginning of each section. Such as under Guiding Frameworks, maybe say "The ICT Review Committee will need to assess the app.. to its implementation". Then u explain what to consider as you've done. Similarly with Organisation Structure.
Lastly, I think there is a project proposal format being used by Govt. maybe someone has a copy? I've lost mine. Depends on who you're submitting this proposal to I guess.
OK. There's my 5 cents. Hope its some help. U did say negative right? Lol
Malo
Lorraine
_____
From: tg-egov@googlegroups.com [mailto:tg-egov@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Samiuela Loni Vea Taufa Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 1:21 PM To: 'Aliki Vimahi; Saia Vaipuna; Melaea Taufatofua; Tevita Mone; Taniela Koloamatangi; tg-egov@googlegroups.com; Alfred Soakai; Fe'ao Vakata; Robin Kaho Subject: [tg-egov] IT Governance, and IT Service Management - Time to move on
Guys/Gals,
Attached is about as far as I can go with the Governance/Service Management thing without your support/comments/rebukes.
The biggest changes from last weeks Draft(s), are
* Proposal requesting a "ICT Review Committee" to do the investigation and make the Plan/Stamp to go forward. * better organisation of the Background and Strategic Context with * hopefully more useful diagrams. * better explanations of the diagrams and relevance to the topic * better referencing? * use of colours?
I really need your feedback, especially negative ones.
* Defining IT Governance and IT Management
* IT Governance: What * IT Management: How
* IT as Technology Partner : IT Infrastructure Management * IT as Service Provider: IT Service Management * IT as Strategic Partner: IT Governance
* What do we have today? * Is there a need for change? * Guiding Frameworks
* IT Governance Frameworks * IT Service Management Frameworks * Guiding Frameworks - Summary
* Organisation Structure for best IT Governance and IT Service Management
* Organisation Structures for IT * IT Governance Structure * IT Service Management Structure - An extended look at a Federal IT Structure * Organisation Structure - Summary
* Summary
As discussed, we need the minimal ICT Governance Framework for our National ICT Working Groups to go forward.
Alfred, your guidance please?
Robin/Fe'ao, can you read and I'll call in this afternoon or tomorrow morning for your comment.
I have a meeting with the wall at PMO tomorrow, so I'll ask them for the "Official" route-stamp.
Take your point on the status (where are we today) and proposal (summary as a synopsis?) Very good points, and will incorporate them.
Thanks,
Sam T.
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:36:06 +1300, "Loleini Liava'a" wrote:
Hi Sam,
A comment from a non-IT person if you don’t mind. So as a non-IT, will be commenting on the structure of the report only. May I suggest incorporating Tonga’s status such as the heading “what do we have today” into IT Governance or IT Management etc. where appropriate. Just think that once the reader is educated on what IT Governance is (for example) they can immediately relate it to Tonga and better understand what we should have but don’t have etc. Secondly, maybe have the summary for each section to be mentioned at the beginning of each section. Such as under Guiding Frameworks, maybe say “The ICT Review Committee will need to assess the app…… to its implementation”. Then u explain what to consider as you’ve done. Similarly with Organisation Structure. Lastly, I think there is a project proposal format being used by Govt. maybe someone has a copy? I’ve lost mine. Depends on who you’re submitting this proposal to I guess. OK. There’s my 5 cents. Hope its some help. U did say negative right? Lol Malo
Lorraine ------------------------- From: tg-egov@googlegroups.com [mailto:tg-egov@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Samiuela Loni Vea Taufa Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 1:21 PM To: 'Aliki Vimahi; Saia Vaipuna; Melaea Taufatofua; Tevita Mone; Taniela Koloamatangi; tg-egov@googlegroups.com; Alfred Soakai; Fe'ao Vakata; Robin Kaho Subject: [tg-egov] IT Governance, and IT Service Management - Time to move on Guys/Gals, Attached is about as far as I can go with the Governance/Service Management thing without your support/comments/rebukes. The biggest changes from last weeks Draft(s), are * Proposal requesting a "ICT Review Committee" to do the investigation and make the Plan/Stamp to go forward. * better organisation of the Background and Strategic Context with * hopefully more useful diagrams. * better explanations of the diagrams and relevance to the topic * better referencing? * use of colours? I really need your feedback, especially negative ones.
*Defining IT Governance and IT Management
*IT Governance: What *IT Management: How
*IT as Technology Partner : IT Infrastructure Management *IT as Service Provider: IT Service Management *IT as Strategic Partner: IT Governance *What do we have today? *Is there a need for change? *Guiding Frameworks
*Organisation Structure for best IT Governance and IT Service Management
*Organisation Structures for IT *IT Governance Structure *IT Service Management Structure - An extended look at a Federal IT Structure *Organisation Structure – Summary
*Summary As discussed, we need the minimal ICT Governance Framework for our National ICT Working Groups to go forward.
Alfred, your guidance please?
Robin/Fe'ao, can you read and I'll call in this afternoon or tomorrow morning for your comment. Thanks, Sam T. --
> I have a meeting with the wall at PMO tomorrow, so I'll ask them for > the "Official" route-stamp.
> Take your point on the status (where are we today) and proposal > (summary as a synopsis?) Very good points, and will incorporate them.
> Thanks,
> Sam T.
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:36:06 +1300, "Loleini Liava'a" wrote:
> Hi Sam,
> A comment from a non-IT person if you don’t mind. So as a non-IT, > will be commenting on the structure of the report only. May I > suggest incorporating Tonga’s status such as the heading “what do > we have today” into IT Governance or IT Management etc. where > appropriate. Just think that once the reader is educated on what > IT Governance is (for example) they can immediately relate it to > Tonga and better understand what we should have but don’t have etc.
> Secondly, maybe have the summary for each section to be mentioned > at the beginning of each section. Such as under Guiding > Frameworks, maybe say “The ICT Review Committee will need to > assess the app…… to its implementation”. Then u explain what to > consider as you’ve done. Similarly with Organisation Structure.
> Lastly, I think there is a project proposal format being used by > Govt. maybe someone has a copy? I’ve lost mine. Depends on who > you’re submitting this proposal to I guess.
> OK. There’s my 5 cents. Hope its some help. U did say negative > right? Lol
> *From:* tg-egov@googlegroups.com [mailto:tg-egov@googlegroups.com] > *On Behalf Of *Samiuela Loni Vea Taufa > *Sent:* Monday, December 10, 2007 1:21 PM > *To:* 'Aliki Vimahi; Saia Vaipuna; Melaea Taufatofua; Tevita Mone; > Taniela Koloamatangi; tg-egov@googlegroups.com; Alfred Soakai; > Fe'ao Vakata; Robin Kaho > *Subject:* [tg-egov] IT Governance, and IT Service Management - > Time to move on
> Guys/Gals,
> Attached is about as far as I can go with the Governance/Service > Management thing without your support/comments/rebukes.
> The biggest changes from last weeks Draft(s), are
> * Proposal requesting a "ICT Review Committee" to do the > investigation and make the Plan/Stamp to go forward. > * better organisation of the Background and Strategic Context with > * hopefully more useful diagrams. > * better explanations of the diagrams and relevance to the topic > * better referencing? > * use of colours?
> I really need your feedback, especially negative ones.
> * Defining IT Governance and IT Management > o IT Governance: What > o IT Management: How > + IT as Technology Partner : IT Infrastructure > Management > + IT as Service Provider: IT Service Management > + IT as Strategic Partner: IT Governance > * What do we have today? > * Is there a need for change? > * Guiding Frameworks > o IT Governance Frameworks > o IT Service Management Frameworks > o Guiding Frameworks - Summary > * Organisation Structure for best IT Governance and IT Service > Management > o Organisation Structures for IT > o IT Governance Structure > o IT Service Management Structure - An extended look at > a Federal IT Structure > o Organisation Structure – Summary > * Summary
> As discussed, we need the minimal ICT Governance Framework for our > National ICT Working Groups to go forward.
> Alfred, your guidance please?
> Robin/Fe'ao, can you read and I'll call in this afternoon or > tomorrow morning for your comment.
> Attached is about as far as I can go with the Governance/Service > Management thing without your support/comments/rebukes.
> The biggest changes from last weeks Draft(s), are
> * Proposal requesting a "ICT Review Committee" to do the investigation > and make the Plan/Stamp to go forward. > * better organisation of the Background and Strategic Context with > * hopefully more useful diagrams. > * better explanations of the diagrams and relevance to the topic > * better referencing? > * use of colours?
> I really need your feedback, especially negative ones.
> * Defining IT Governance and IT Management > o IT Governance: What > o IT Management: How > + IT as Technology Partner : IT Infrastructure Management > + IT as Service Provider: IT Service Management > + IT as Strategic Partner: IT Governance > * What do we have today? > * Is there a need for change? > * Guiding Frameworks > o IT Governance Frameworks > o IT Service Management Frameworks > o Guiding Frameworks - Summary > * Organisation Structure for best IT Governance and IT Service > Management > o Organisation Structures for IT > o IT Governance Structure > o IT Service Management Structure - An extended look at a > Federal IT Structure > o Organisation Structure Summary > * Summary
> As discussed, we need the minimal ICT Governance Framework for our > National ICT Working Groups to go forward.
> Alfred, your guidance please?
> Robin/Fe'ao, can you read and I'll call in this afternoon or tomorrow > morning for your comment.