Is @Test annotation on class compatible with IHookable?

[Tim Boemker]

The TestNG documentation says this:

The @Test annotation can be put on a class instead of a test method.  The effect of a class level @Test annotation is to make all the public methods of this class to become test methods even if they are not annotated.

Is it possible for a class with an @Test annotation to implement IHookable?  Because run(IHookCallBack callBack, ITestResult testResult) is public, TestNG tries unsuccessfully to run it as a test method.

Is there a way to tell TestNG to ignore this method?

[Cédric Beust ♔]

Not really. The usual way to do this is to make the method protected but it's not an option here since you are implementing an interface. Either put it in a different class or maybe an inner class? (although it might still be captured by the class-level @Test annotation, not 100% sure).

-- 

Cédric

-- 

Cédric

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "testng-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to testng-dev+...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to testn...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/testng-dev?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

[Tim Boemker]

I don't see how it can be put in a different class, or an inner class.  To be useful, it has to be implemented in the test class:

If a test class implements this interface, its run() method will be invoked instead of each @Test method found.