Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Financial discrepancy: Audit of Universal Service Fund demanded
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  2 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post will appear after it is approved by moderators
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Wajid Mahmood  
View profile  
 More options May 18 2012, 12:41 am
From: Wajid Mahmood <wajid.mahm...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 21:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, May 18 2012 12:41 am
Subject: Financial discrepancy: Audit of Universal Service Fund demanded
KARACHI:
It seems that no one can beat our bureaucrats when it comes to
spending someone else’s money to appease the sitting government.
Telecom operators’ apprehension about the misuse of their hard-earned
money by Ministry of Information Technology (MoIT) is the latest
attack on one of the highly taxed sectors of the economy.

Telecom companies contributed Rs117 billion, almost one-third of its
revenues, to the national exchequer last year; it may have fallen
short of the government’s expectations though as the latter,
allegedly, spent Rs120 million out of a telecom fund for political
gains.

MoIT has spent a huge amount out of the Universal Service Fund (USF)
on projecting the achievements of the government in electronic media
during last two months, stakeholders said in a written complaint to IT
and Telecom Minister Raja Pervaiz Ashraf.

They also asked Ashraf to conduct an inquiry about the illegal use of
USF and take action against those responsible for the same; a source
familiar with the matter told The Express Tribune.

Telecom operators – each of whom contributes 1.5% of their gross
income to USF – are the sole sponsor of the company. USF is meant for
the expansion of telecom network to the remote areas – which do not
make a business case for telecos.

The aforesaid amount, according to the source, was spent without any
budget allocation and approval of the USF’s board of directors.
Competitive bidding procedure and Public Procurement Rules were not
followed either while awarding the contract to a single ad agency, the
source added. This act is contrary to the Public Procurement
Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002; the source said.

The money spent on media campaign, the source said, was in violation
of section 33 (B) (2) of Pakistan Telecommunication (Re-organization)
(Amendment) Act, 2005, which states:

“The USF shall be utilised exclusively for providing access to
telecommunication services to people in the un-served, under-served,
rural and remote areas and other expenditure to be made and incurred
by the Federal Government in managing USF.”

The USF’s last year’s advertising budget was about Rs5 to 6 million,
the source said, but this year they spent Rs120 million and that, too,
on political campaign – causing uneasiness among telecos whose money
was wasted in media campaign for political purposes.

USF currently has about Rs30 billion in its account; the telecos
annual contribution to the fund is about Rs3 to 4 billion, the source
said. This money – which would be needed for the expansion of telecom
network to remote locations following the 3G auction – is likely to be
used for political campaigns as general elections are nearing, the
source said.

Another telecom source, who wished not to be named, also confirmed
that the money spent on the media campaign was not approved by the
board. He, however, said USF has about Rs40 to Rs45 billion its
account while the money used in the ad campaign was higher than Rs120
million.

Despite several attempts – via phone and email – to contact the
minister; secretary and other MoIT officials, no contact could be
established to find out if any inquiry has been launched in this
regard.
However, a government official – when contacted on his cell phone –
said the media campaign was approved by the Prime Minister, then
chairman of USF board.

The chairman can’t approve this without the approval of the board, the
official said, requesting he should not be quoted. Representatives of
the telecom sector are also on board, he said, they were part of the
decision.
The use of funds depends upon the board that owns the fund, the
official said, adding if the board desires to use it for advertising,
it can. However, it is done in accord with the rules and regulations
governing USF; he added.
The official refused to talk about the amount used for the media
campaign, saying it was not in his knowledge.

Published in The Express Tribune, May 17th, 2012.
http://tribune.com.pk/story/379969/financial-discrepancy-audit-of-uni...


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Rehan Allahwala  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options May 25 2012, 10:28 am
From: Rehan Allahwala <re...@supertec.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 19:28:12 +0500
Local: Fri, May 25 2012 10:28 am
Subject: Re: Financial discrepancy: Audit of Universal Service Fund demanded

Any news on this ?
On May 18, 2012 9:30 AM, "Wajid Mahmood" <wajid.mahm...@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »