I'm glad u n Asif agree wid me.
well.. lets say v take provincial capitals as our target cities i.e.
isb. (being capital), khi, pesh., quetta nd lhr.
and for ISPs we consider only major 1's dat hav substantial market
presence (both consumer+corp.)
howz dat fer a start..
nd on PTA's recent research.. well PTA being govt. owned yea recent =
'07 and da material i got was based on overall pak. telco. growth..
damn idiots.. dey have given market share of Telco companies; not
ISPs.
Your (ne1 i.e.) suggestions r appreciated!
On Aug 20, 2:12 pm, "Wasim Baig" <
wa...@convergence.pk> wrote:
> Concur, but a response like
>
> "Cybernet & Wateen"
>
>
>
> doesn't really address this query.
>
> Perhaps, a few technical details by the proponents on why they feel a
> particular ISP has a dominant market share?
>
> - Cities served
> - # of broadband users (per city)
> - # of dialup ports (per city)
> - any special notes of interest
>
> etc, so a fair evaluation on market share can be attempted at,
> although wasn't a study like this conducted by PTA in recent past?
>
> -wasim
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Asif Hanafi <
asifhan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think Kami has a very valid question, this being a telecom/IT related
> > group, its a normal question to ask what the market share of individual ISPs
> > is.
>
> > On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Farhan Jaffer <
bandh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Sorry to say, but this is not a place of Marketing :). And i believe
> >> Kami do not ask this type of detail.
>
> >> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Shahid Mirza <
shahid.mir...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Along with Wateen & CyberNet
>
> >> > Link Dot Net (Old Name Dancom Online)
> >> > MicroNet is providing excellent services in ISB/RWP. You may say they
> >> are
> >> > market leaders in terms customer base.
>