> IMHO, below are threats to our society.
>
> 1. Violence and torture in online content:
> 2. Religious extremism and terrorism:
>
> 3. Political exploitation, religious misinformation:
>
> 4. Loss of health and wealth:
>
> 5. Vulgar content/ sexual offending:
More people in Pakistan are exposed to these 'cultural threats' on a
daily basis in real life than they ever are online.
> Recommendations:
Either you want the internet turned off, or you don't understand how it
works.
> 1. While PTA does censor some sites, however it needs to sharpen its
> filter. This is easily said than done. Due to proxies and mirrors, it
> is usually difficult to block such sites; however, PTA needs to
> exercise stern control over the ISPs to block the browsing of such
> sites. PTA can adopt auto tagging of websites to automate the process
> of vigilance.
Why are you willing to let the PTA decide for you what people in
Pakistan should or shouldn't be able to do online? What is it about the
PTA that makes you think you can trust them? They can't even secure
their own website!
> In general however, blocking the sites without caring for the mirrors
> does bear results. Using sophisticated concepts such as mirrors and
> redirection are not expected from teens. I don’t consider it a
> guaranteed solution, but it can reduce the access to some extent.
Blocking sites is a waste of time and money, and a failure. This has
been proven time and time again.
> 2. Most of the adult content stems from external sources. Merely
> blocking the sites will create vacuum for content, which if
> unfulfilled by decent local content, will fail to bear results. The
> fact that the site owner is subject to law will go a long way in
> posting prohibitive content. Nor can such sites resort to mischief and
> fraud.
> PTA needs to introduce the benefits of hosting websites. In a longer
> extent, this has roots in entrepreneurship, an idea discouraged in
> Pakistan. There is enormous potential of revenue by producing local
> content in our emerging market. Entrepreneurship, an infant idea here,
> once stimulated can bring sheer profits. In general, if PTA can
> initiate some equity based sponsorships to promote local content, it
> can resolve the issue to a large extent.
I don't understand this point. I don't think you've explained this
properly. What does blocking external adult content have to do with
encouraging local content? They're two different issues. Just because
someone can't get to a porn site doesn't mean they'll turn to
http://geo.tv/.
> 3. Formation of a board of scholars to monitor the content This needs
> joint efforts of PTA, Government of Pakistan and scholars. To counter
> the perils caused by the terrorist organizations, mischief mongers as
> well as those spreading misinformation about the basic belief, faith
> and principles of Islam, there needs to be board of scholars,
> responsible to vet the contents of Islamic websites, plus to aware the
> masses of any canvassing and propaganda.
> Due to the sensitivity of content, scholars from all the Islamic
> schools of thought need to be part of the board. PTA and Government
> may need to finance this nonprofit venture.
Because scholars from all the Islamic schools of thought get along *JUST
FINE* already, right?
> 4. Government of Pakistan needs to create responsiveness in common
> masses, in the same paths as family planning and other campaigns are
> being run. Indeed, in rural areas, where literacy is low, this needs
> to be done on urgent basis, lest it could spoil huge population.
> Government of Pakistan needs to inform the parents and adults about
> the opportunities as well as perils this cyberspace brings along. Most
> of the solutions presented require the installation of some browsers
> which block unsafe content. But such browsers will only be installed
> at the will of the parents and guardians. The children by themselves
> cannot be assumed mature enough to install such browsers. Indeed, if
> they were, no such browsers were needed in first place: they simply
> won’t access the harmful sites. This shows the importance of
> generating consciousness in parents, teachers and guardians.
'Cyberspace' is less of a problem than you think. Clean water, now
that's a problem the government should do something about.
(Electricity, too, while we're at it.)
> 5. Provision of online games has considerably reduced the
> participation of teens in physical exercises and sports. This has
> detrimental effect on their physical growth and buildup.
> Government of Pakistan needs to mandate sports at school and college
> level. In addition, it needs to ask the several sports boards to
> sponsor sports at grass root domestic level. Formal sponsorship of
> domestic level sports has long been razed off. Government of Pakistan
> needs to revive it. Creating such healthy opportunities and facilities
> will reduce the time spent online.
Will my children be forced to play cricket in school? I don't want some
bureaucrat in Islamabad deciding what sports my kids should or shouldn't
play.
I don't want YOU deciding that, either.
> 6. Children are innocent. They can hardly distinguish between
> preaching and exploitation, teaching and propaganda canvassing et al.
> They are vulnerable to be grabbed by the political and ethnic
> factions, which can use them for their evil purposes. Indeed, harmful
> contents hosted online can result in disharmony in colleges, where
> students join unions and movements. Thus, such seemingly minute
> canvassing can lead to grave consequences.
> Government of Pakistan needs to monitor the blogs and sites
> perpetrated by religious and political factions. It needs to prepare a
> more focused & elaborate code of conduct for the content hosted in
> blogs and sites.
How will the government keep husbands from beating their wives (or vice
versa -- it happens) in front of their kids?
Faried.
--
(> (length "eclipse") (length "emacs")) => T
facebook is blocked due to a security policy of National University
of Sciences & Technology......
The use of Facebook is a security issue now?
Or is it a case of an aggressive attempt to 'protect our kids in
cyberspace'?