Thanks Faraz Khan of Emergen who forwarded this to me ...
TGP should present unified support to this cause ...
I'm sending this to you as I know that everybody on this list cares about the local and international IT policies of the government which affect all of us. I do not know if you are aware but there is a huge battle going on worldwide regarding the OOXML issue. To read up on this please check out:
OOXML is a office document standard Microsoft is proposing which is pending ISO standardization for office document files.
There is far too much corruption going on in the world and some corrupt governments which are run by Microsoft (including, sadly, unsurprisingly, ours) are voting FOR OOXML.
THERE IS NO REASON TO VOTE FOR OOXML SINCE THERE ALREADY IS A STANDARD - ODF.
OOXML is firstly, not a proper standard and secondly, leaves gaping holes for Microsoft to 'close' it in the future. This cannot be allowed to happen. The standard of the future is ODF and Microsoft should not be allowed to ruin our future further.
ISO needs consent of 2/3rd majority by the world countries to push OOXML as a standard. Moreover, our beloved Pakistan has initially voted FOR OOXML (The meeting was held hush-hush by the PSQCA and on the board were 4 Microsoft Gold members!!).
FSF India (Free Sofware Foundation, India) has moved their government to say a unanimous NO to the OOXML issue (half the countries in the world have voted AGAINST it, countries where corruption is high have voted FOR it)
Involvement from your side in this meeting to vote AGAINST OOXML can help force our country's decision. If you wish to help, please acknowledge. Fouad Bajwa is copied on this email who is organizing a 'movement' against OOXML and making a case to the government in the next meeting.
-- wasim h. baig | principal consultant | convergence pk | +92 300 8508070
Off course, MS will gladly vote for a competing standard when they have ulterior motives so to speak. They voted for ODF to be included as part of ANSI back in May of this year:
The responses from Pakistan and India appear to echo those for the One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) project. While the Pakistanis welcomed the initiative, apparently without much thought, the Indians questioned its effectiveness due to such a large number of their population living below the poverty line ($100 was money better spent on feeding and clothing a starving child).
We need to get our government to think outside the box and think things through instead of blindly putting their faith in the biggest names out there and it's forums like TGP that could convince them to do this.
On 10/26/07, Wasim Baig <wa...@convergence.pk> wrote:
> Thanks Faraz Khan of Emergen who forwarded this to me ...
> TGP should present unified support to this cause ...
> I'm sending this to you as I know that everybody on this list cares about > the local and international IT policies of the government which affect all > of us. I do not know if you are aware but there is a huge battle going on > worldwide regarding the OOXML issue. To read up on this please check out:
> OOXML is a office document standard Microsoft is proposing which is > pending ISO standardization for office document files.
> There is far too much corruption going on in the world and some corrupt > governments which are run by Microsoft (including, sadly, unsurprisingly, > ours) are voting FOR OOXML.
> THERE IS NO REASON TO VOTE FOR OOXML SINCE THERE ALREADY IS A STANDARD - > ODF.
> OOXML is firstly, not a proper standard and secondly, leaves gaping holes > for Microsoft to 'close' it in the future. This cannot be allowed to happen. > The standard of the future is ODF and Microsoft should not be allowed to > ruin our future further.
> ISO needs consent of 2/3rd majority by the world countries to push OOXML > as a standard. Moreover, our beloved Pakistan has initially voted FOR OOXML > (The meeting was held hush-hush by the PSQCA and on the board were 4 > Microsoft Gold members!!).
> FSF India (Free Sofware Foundation, India) has moved their government to > say a unanimous NO to the OOXML issue (half the countries in the world have > voted AGAINST it, countries where corruption is high have voted FOR it)
> Involvement from your side in this meeting to vote AGAINST OOXML can help > force our country's decision. If you wish to help, please acknowledge. > Fouad Bajwa is copied on this email who is organizing a 'movement' against > OOXML and making a case to the government in the next meeting.
> -- > wasim h. baig | principal consultant | convergence pk | +92 300 8508070
TGP will not influence anyone in power. We can discuss issues, clarify and analyse. To actually DO anything we have to interact directly with PSEB, MoIT and even PSQCA. The only organisation that can do this is PASHA, I think.
I have to say that I never thought of the PSQCA as relevant to me !
Ashar
On Friday 26 October 2007 10:38:08 Sajjad Zaidi wrote:
> We need to get our government to think outside the box and think things > through instead of blindly putting their faith in the biggest names out > there and it's forums like TGP that could convince them to do this.
I might be opening up an old topic, but does anyone know what transpired of the OOXML which Pakistan was so eager to quickly approve. Some people were kind enough to alert me that it is possible that Pakistan and Microsoft might be all too eager to finalize the adoption here in Pakistan. I ain't privy to the specifics and it could all be just another rumor but considering the hush-hush silence through which our govt passed the E-Crime Bill - I would rather be safe / alert then sorry.
> TGP will not influence anyone in power. We can discuss issues, clarify and > analyse. To actually DO anything we have to interact directly with PSEB, > MoIT > and even PSQCA. The only organisation that can do this is PASHA, I think.
> I have to say that I never thought of the PSQCA as relevant to me !
> Ashar
> On Friday 26 October 2007 10:38:08 Sajjad Zaidi wrote: > > We need to get our government to think outside the box and think things > > through instead of blindly putting their faith in the biggest names out > > there and it's forums like TGP that could convince them to do this.
All the members of the committee were invited by Microsoft to Dubai for a fact finding tour I believe that the trip has been made and many facts have been found ;-)
Current stage is that impartial panel of experts as Core Nucleus Group will be formed. This will consist of people from PSQCA (2 reps), and one each from IT (dont know what that means, but probably someone from the Ministry), Pasha, Fast. Also on board will be the Chairman of the Technical Committee and Qazi Mashhood as independent expert (Qazi sahib works for Kalsoft, a Microsoft partner and so his independence is questionable).
IBM, Microsoft and LinuxPakistan will then present their positions to the panel of experts. Terms of reference include: • The protection of the Country’s interests regarding the DIS • Compatibility Factors • Workability of the DIS under reference • The technical evaluation • Financial implications • Future strategy
I'd like to see what possible arguments anyone could put forward regarding OOXML and the national interest. If I am going to have to buy Microsoft Vista (Rs7000) and Office (Rs9000) to read any official electronic document then that is not a good thing. Financial implications for the govt are horrendous (quick, if the govt has 100,000 pcs and each needs Rs16,000 worth of MS software just to boot,, thats about 1.6Billion Rupees). Not bad for sending a couple of dozen people to Dubai.
> I might be opening up an old topic, but does anyone know what transpired of > the OOXML which Pakistan was so eager to quickly approve. Some people were > kind enough to alert me that it is possible that Pakistan and Microsoft > might be all too eager to finalize the adoption here in Pakistan. I ain't > privy to the specifics and it could all be just another rumor but > considering the hush-hush silence through which our govt passed the E-Crime > Bill - I would rather be safe / alert then sorry.
> *Links to better understand the OOXML issue** > *
|
