2007 is almost over I'm taking some time out to sit on the sidewalk and watch others fly by on the innovation path we have been given. I'm wondering just 'Where are we going?' I'm looking to the near future.
It seems to me these days innovation in flexible learning is about as much being the most aware and proficient consumer as it is about any other aspect of learning. I recall the many enthusiastic squeals of delight when I and the people within my network discover a new technology throwing ourselves wholeheartedly through our thoughts, behaviour and media, to a identity, often with much personal information which is then virally promulgated to our unwitting local community of teachers and students…but something has changed for me.
I recently took part in a discussion with some colleagues on the huge 2007 groundswell in use of networking technologies for teachers and students alike; facebook, wikis, blogs, photosharing and virtual worlds… we love them!
From the conversation there is no doubt in the result, there are many positive outcomes for example:
The excitement and sense of connection between people through the technology is palpable, I've heard "the pull towards the grid is strong" but in this talk, with radical technologies on the horizon for 2008 could we unwittingly or even willingly be being lead down the garden path, on a predetermined route based on predicative human behavior?
Are we developing modes of learning, operating, communicating and seeing ourselves and others in the world based on a fait accompli and could the success of the social networking within a life based learning model be a precursor to total systems of control?
I remember Stephen Downe's great video on Groups and Network's, what really sticks in my mind is that word ' Democracy' on the whiteboard under networks, the bottom up network as freedom, 'sticking it to the man'? on reflection I'm not so sure… as Orwell is quoted,""He who controls the past commands the future. He who commands the future conquers the past."
Who controls the past? I'm recently looking to the past and the education system we know and love, where does it come from and what does it point to and importantly what does it mean for our children in the emergent networked world.
Gatto neatly summarizes his the origins of control in this teaching resource'The makers of modern schooling' and in more detail in his book The Underground History of American Education.
Video - State controlled consciousness
'Perhaps the greatest of school's illusions is that the institution was launched by a group of kindly men and women who wanted to help the children of ordinary families―to level the playing field, so to speak.' John Taylor Gatto
I also recommend listening to this eye opening interview with John Taylor Gatto by the journalist Alex Jones. In teh intereview he talks about a systematic educational philosophy that seeks to destroy imaginative thinking, dissolve cohesian of the family and remove competiton against the state. What was the change in the past to precipitate our present learning (control) systems?
'If modern schooling has a "Fourth Purpose," there must be an earlier three. Traditional forms of instruction in America, even before the Revolution, had three specific purposes:
The new mass schooling which came about slowly but continuously after 1890, had a different purpose, a "fourth" purpose. The fourth purpose steadily squeezed the traditional three to the margins of schooling; in the fourth purpose, school in America became like school in Germany, a servant of corporate and political management.
We should reveal the mechanism of mind control training, habits, and attitudes. Children were literally trained in bad habits and bad attitudes! Teachers and principals, "scientifically"certified in teachers college practices, were made unaware of the invisible curriculum they really taught.
The secret of commerce, that kids drive purchases, meant that schools had to become psychological laboratories where training in consumerism was the central pursuit.' - John Taylor Gatto'
Gatto above explains the change in education to get us to where we are today as the fourth purpose based on the the Business of Schooling . It's no surprise that the root is founded on the power influence and money of the bank, corporate, industrial powers who seek ultimate control over peoples minds. In the not so distant past the hubric 'gods' of industry such as Ford, Rockefeller and JP Morgan needed men as the base resource to be used in the industrial production line system (These elite families are still around running the UN! and Kyoto ahem).
Do your own research, if you go looking for further evidence of involvement I suggest going to the horse's mouth, here's a fascinating interview from the 80's.
Fortunes are spent on research by the elite through NGO's, round table groups and goverment on breaking down human behaviourism, social engineering globally to figure out how re-condition people to fit their New World Order control system and maintain their status quo and power (whilst becoming insanely wealthly in the process). Viz. through understanding the mind they can remake people into what we want them to be, the education system as we know has been the cornerstone of the elite's success (even the instructional design system that we know and love has it's origins within a military control system as challenged by Stephen Downes recently in his talk 'Free learning and control learning').
What's to be learnt from the past, it's all about the future right?, we're all familiar with Pink Floyd's 'The wall' a song about the control system, what's changed since that was given to our culture? we're still learning to fulfill our function, except now we're enjoying the bread and circuses of entertainment as part of a networked control grid.
Video- Huxley talking about "Brave New World" and "1984″
As the old industrial and banking paper fiat currency systems collapse post 2008-2012 and we move to the fiat electronic chipping system (It's happening), as before control of the technology and education system will be strategically used as part of conditioning to consolidate total control of future generations of worker's , (IF WE'RE NEEDED AT ALL- READ THIS). Many of us lab rats will be training kids not only how to plug into the grid but to love it and get paid quite handsomely for it…
'It's the year 2040 and Ray Hammond is getting advice from his software assistant Maria. Located in an implant just behind his left ear, Maria has a direct connection with Mr Hammond's brain. Linked with Google and other search engines, Maria is able to filter, search and speak softly to Mr Hammond, as quietly and as transparently as if she were his own thoughts.
Financial service providers, banks and retailers have made it their business to connect with Maria. As a result, she is able to provide Mr Hammond with the best deals around.
And, of course, Maria is much smarter than Mr Hammond. Too smart to let him know.' - Leon Gettle, The future is here right now if you can read the signs
Video - IBM RFID Checkout in Supermarket
OK just remember class, you are free to do as we tell you. DARPA SMARPA we better wake up, Happy Christmas :-)
I baidu (chinese version of Google)the name , I found that he is the father of Songqingling (she is the wife of Jiangjieshi ) leader of KMT in taiwan , but I see your point , I think US are having a great influence on China now is even bigger than before , if you walk on the street nowdays , you will see more people are celebrating Xmas now even bigger than Spring festival , it is been crazy , last week in the supermarket , they played some stupid Xmas song over and over again , almost drive me crazy , I like Xmas , but feel so weird that people are so crazy about this here NOWDAYS in everywhere China . any comments ? China is absolutely losing its color ,it is not RED anymore , what color will be become ?
Leo
http://leolaoshi.yo2.cn
Confucius
Not following your passion will probably be worse.Thankyou for this great post , I really like and feel related to the saying about Past and present and future ,
Thank you I'm trying to get my head around:
Past - Education systems as a control mechanism to produce the workers and subjects for the industrial age – a valid assertion?
Present – Education - Where we're at, where we're going, what does it mean, what are the choices?
Future – Education as a bridge to carry us over safely in to the post industrial era.
Here in China , I have been feeling this so stongly , it is been a fad that many educator are trying to use web 2.0 tools to transform or help with their teaching or even making a lot of money of it .
but the problem I have felt is , we forgot our past , we have a old saying in Chinese is " studying without reflecting can make a person stupid " this is from Confusious in about 5000 years ago , and relecting without working hard cannot make a man smart also fromhim ,
What I am saying here is we have to know our past , and orignate from the past and begin to look into future , that is why Last time when we invited some of foreign expert coming to our school to give a lecture , we often end up with more confusing expression on our face , is this something really working in China ? what this white guy talking about can help us with our problems ?
It is absolutely good to learn from West , but many times we forgot that the most important thing is not to "learn "from others ,but first knowing that where we are , and where we are heading to ? what is our future ?
'hi just seen your photo and its great i know mrs macdonald very well and have told her and shown her this photo she cant really get her head around the web thing but she loves your photos x mark'
An example of capturing sharing and distilling cultural information and the human side of web 2.0.
One of my students asked me the other day in our QQ group , and even created a fight , he said , why we need to learn this web 2.0 stuff , I am not seeing the meaning of learning this , I think we should focus more on other things blabla ...
maybe what he said is not much holding the water , but I can feel that when any of teacher or educator are trying to push us to look into the future , but we forgot to look back to see what we left behind ,
we need to know the past , so that we can walk firmly to the future .there is a long way to go , but so many people here in China think that there should a shortcut , but I don't think there is one , teaching a lost art here for a long time , in college here in China , I spent so much time on my class lesson plan , but Gosh , I would not get any rewards from doing that , I even doubt on myself ,should I do this ? spend hours hours on my lesson plan , but not payback ,even I can do this for this year coZ i AM young , but how about the future , I don't know if I can still devote somuch of my time on the classes I am teaching in next 10 years , coz I don't see the way out .
I agree, in this day and age our culture and technologies are given to us by the elite and the corporations, in the past it was our local communities the elders and traditions looking out for and protecting the younger generations. Web 2.0 is a perfect example of culture/ technologies given to us and this makes us very vulnerable to cultural brainwashing, especially the younger generation of kids who will know nothing else. No doubt Web 2.0 fulfills some of our basic human social instincts to belong to a group and in some cases such as this TALO group and the flickr example the communication tools enable us to share 'wisdom' 'knowledge' with 'the tribe', all good....BUT
In the process we are being set up quite nicely by the elite and the corporations for the next big cultural shift in the West, a total control system, not good. We are becoming socially conditioning to ways of exisitng within a networked society this fits hand on glove with the incremental moves to a cashless society, individual RFID tagging, brain scanning and total control grid of the survelliance society. Get indignant.
Video-
Here are too examples of new technologies given to us in the disguise of entertainment all very exciting basically we are on a timeline to undermine inner sovereignty of the individual (The serfs) you and me.
These web 2.0 technologies are totally elitist by stealth in consolidating total systems of power as part of a cultural shift, I expect in the next stage it's going to be really sad how readily people/consumers will give up their inner sovereignty their consciousness, their soul, in the name of entertainment or efficiency, we'll probably be given no choice, unless we wake up.We are accessories to the fact, children, Mammals learn from their parents about threats much like the seal gets told that the polar bear is bad, unless adults point the dangers out to the children the future generations will be non the wiser. The end of all conflict non thinking individuals (If we are not there already) to upset the powerbase, renewable workers just the predictive cultural programming of Brave New World by Huxley...for total control everyone must be totally predictable and under surveillance.
It is very discouraging to do things where nobody share your views your passion .
Sorry for this pessimistic post , I think I just need a break from my work ,from all these educational innovation here in China , it is a race ,but who win ??
'I don't know where these people hide their fear. As an architect of complex systems I enter this arena as a generalist. But should this diminish my concerns? I am aware of how much has been written about, talked about, and lectured about so authoritatively. But does this mean it has reached people? Does this mean we can discount the dangers before us?
Knowing is not a rationale for not acting. Can we doubt that knowledge has become a weapon we wield against ourselves?'
Bill Joy - Sun Micro systems http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy.html
> Sponsored Links
Mine feel more TALO contextual?(below)
But I have had some mail lists I have unsubbed from bcause the content
was colouring my day
in the wider gmail sense. Its a strange feeling when the cranky mails
coming in your inbox get echo
advertising. flamewar amplification. i would like to be able to vote
things off topic in the advertising space.
Advertising that thinks it fits you is a strange thing.
Janet
Study Abroad in China
Academic & language courses for university students for $8,000/sem.
YangtzeInternationalUniversity.org
Learn Chinese at Tsinghua
Accredited. China's top university. Complete Chinese immersion in China
www.prcstudy.com
Study Mandarin in China
Cost effective language placement Variety of courses and start dates
www.chinese-in-china.com
Yunnan Tours
Locally-hosted Yunan tour from $520 Check & book! Enjoy more & Pay less
www.china-tour.cn
Learn Chinese
Learn Chinese in our online Courses with live teachers from Beijing.
www.chinesevoice.com
What is Culture Shock?
Watch this movie to find out. Also on Amazn.com
www.culturedocumentary.com
Sea-kayak Fiji
Guided journeys in beautiful Fiji. Adventure, culture, and nature.
www.seakayakfiji.com
More about...
University Study in China »
China Universities »
China Uni »
Chinese Course in China »
Qinghua University »
Starting Business in China »
International Students in China »
Master of in China »
About these links
Basically I think we need to be able to do things bottom up.
Keeping the choice close to the educator/student.
National censorship cannot be nimble or subtle or diverse enough to be useful.
People in another thread were talking about how people work around word blocking
Here was my response in that context.
==================
For an example in action visit an online MMORPG like Runescape which
has a strong word based filter on in game chat.
http://runescape.com/
(You can create a free account but expect to go through a tutorial
before finding yourself in a space where people are speaking.
Saturated name space is also an interesting culture shaping factor.)
The language used to communicate in those kinds of spaces includes
game item shorthand, sms shorthand and rewangled language designed for
expression in the negative spaces between the filtered words.
The filter in this space also ignores whitespace so normal sentences
can be blocked because the combinations of 2 words makes something
which gets *****. This does change how people speak/write in those
spaces. People are also more adept at enterpreting ***.
It is a game going through interesting times at the moment due to
people trading game items or accounts for real money. The game company
is responding by locking down the game economy which is having
interesting impact on the community/play.
Changing from a supply demand based economy to a defined value economy
will be an interesting social and economic experience for the kids in
the western countries where the game is hosted.
Watching virtual spaces become more integrated with wider economics
makes me want to ask questions about how societies would like to
define their economies in online contexts and what these kinds of
decisions contribute in shaping our wider cultural interactions.
Watching what is effectively a stockmarket crash in a game is
interesting, but thinking about how virtual spaces shape economic
thinking into the future is the related wider set of questions.
Those who create the rules of the game in online spaces do not
participate in governance based on social or national interests except
in as far as they want to retain good subscriptions. This game has
previously banned large numbers of players for cheating by using auto
accounts or breaking game rules. They are pretty strong on shaping the
character of the space.
Kids have grown up watching the rules change around the economies they
participate in. The rules are perhaps more changeable and transient.
Their civic role is more as a subscriber than a voter or particpant.
Perhaps these experiences contribute to future/current adult ideas about what is
economically interesting or possible and where control of economies
happen.
Economies which are contained within bubble of a single company's
choices are an interesting phenomenon. Snow Crash was an exploration
of these ideas some years before we could practice it. Games answering
the challenge of free and open participation with restrictive social
controls are an interesting phenomenon. Watching the same choices in
play in our wider community makes me wonder what other strategies we
are not trying (online, offline or in games) which might help us model
free and responsible online communities.
Janet
And another perspective. Censorship and science.
http://www.gdt.id.au/~gdt/blog/strategy/2008-01-02.1024px
Janet
Janet
Rather, it was an embrace of "Selective Technology": a technology of the necessary. It was an embrace of what enhances human life rather than just complicates it; a balanced blend of the best of the new and the best of the old.
In 2009, there was no such thing as too much technology. People had become Technoslaves (See "Technoslaves.com," Trends Journal®, Winter 2008. Click here) It was impossible for whole generations to imagine life without BlackBerries, texting, GPS, iPods, cell phones, the Internet. More = better. New = better. One habit ripe for reconsideration was the relationship between man and technology.