RFD -- Removing talk.religion.course-miracle (Was "What a Hoot!")

[Nancy]

"Alan" <al...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:408F45BB...@nospam.com...
> Tomaso wrote:
> >
> > Alan "Are you really this monumentally stupid, or do you
> > just play the village idiot on the Usenet? Dali is
> > trying to explain to you that the only reason Mike
> > encourages people to "experience EOTS", is because
> > you keep misrepresenting it's teachings. Therefore
> > it's reasonable to suggest that anybody wishing to
> > know the facts, would best find them there, rather
> > than taking the word of a raving maniac, like you."
> >
> > ~ I don't think so. If John has misrepresented Wayne's teachings,
> > then the reasonable thing to do would be to present the correct
> > teachings, not urge people to "experience EOTS." The
insurmountable
> > problem you have is that Wayne's teachings have generally been
> > presented by means of Wayne's own words.
>
> It's not really so much the metaphysical aspects of
> the teachings that he's misrepresented, although he
> has. It has more to do with the misrepresentations,
> along with outright lies, he's told about how Wayne
> treats his students, and how EOTS members behave. I
> personally know for a fact that John is wrong, so I
> understand the inclination to say "check it out for
> yourself if you're curious, don't take his word for
> it." I've resisted doing so because I knew it would
> be interpreted as "recruitment", though it wouldn't
> be. I couldn't care less if people go there, I just
> don't care for the folks there being misrepresented
> by him, especially when he knows little about them.

I agree.

Nancy

[J. L.]

ROTFLMAO. Certainly you can't give examples of misrepresentation. None of
course, which don't come from Eots headquarters. How irresponsible for
someone who says she knows nothing about Eots, to continue to apologize for
an defend a pernacious cult which preys on Course students.