The non teaching high watermark for today!
Happy
In reference to: Even if you are non teaching you are teaching.
Comment made by Mike Ryder.
Caught by Caroline Smith.
Class dismissed
MikeRyder
For one of such self-perceived advanced sprituality you sure do like
to bicker a lot.
(Note: bickering = conflict. Ergo, you love conflict)
Happy
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:21:26 -0800 (PST), Happy
>
> >(((((("Well duh"))))))
>
> >In reference to: Even if you are non teaching you are teaching.
>
> >Comment made by Mike Ryder.
>
> >Caught by Caroline Smith.
>
> >Class dismissed
>
> For one of such self-perceived advanced sprituality you sure do like
> to bicker a lot.
>
> (Note: bickering = conflict. Ergo, you love conflict)
No matter how much you insist, conflict is not real,
MikeRyder
No matter how much you insist, you are in gross denial.
Happy
Yes but it is a good kind of denial.
MikeRyder
Actually, it isnt a "good denial".
Happy
It is, but you're free to deny that all you want.
MikeRyder
lol. It isnt "a good kind of denial" when you do something, in this
case promote conflict, and then deny you're doing it.
Question: Have you been studying the Lampoon version of A Course in
Miracles?
Happy
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:16:14 -0800 (PST), Happy
>
>
>
>
>
How can I promote something that isn't real?
MikeRyder
Take an honest deprogrammed look and you might see how you're doing
it.
Happy
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:55:18 -0800 (PST), Happy
>
>
>
>
>
Oh thanks for the helpful tip.
LOL
MikeRyder
When are you (and your cronies) going to start having enlightened acim
discussions?
george
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:09:15 -0800 (PST), Happy
>
>
>
ACIM is about the application. That's where the meaning is learned.
Talk is cheap and doesn't give the meaning.
MikeRyder
I guess the newsgroup will no longer be treated to your endless
lectures, right geo?
george
What I meant was that without the application of the course principles
it's impossible to understand the course because with the application
comes the understanding of what it means. To talk about ACIM but to
not apply it, means that it's not understood by the person talking
about it.
expires
I've been reading your personal interpretation of ACIM
for many months now. Going by what you write, you, George,
IMHO don't even understand that you don't understand any-
thing at all. Please carry on going in circles, I find it
quite entertaining to watch how you tell the story of your
"new" form of addiction, which you describe as being your
path to being healed from being an ego-addict/-worshiper.
FMPOV you're still wholly addicted to the George-story ;-))
--expires
Pieter
> What I meant was that without the application of the course principles
> it's impossible to understand the course because with the application
> comes the understanding of what it means. To talk about ACIM but to
> not apply it, means that it's not understood by the person talking
> about it.
Agreed; imo this is a very important point.
Not applying it would mean: "I love the goal,
but I am not at all interested in the means
to get there." The "but . . . " completely
enervates the contention preceding it.