Status Check on the Conflict
MikeRyder
now ol' george seems to be at the center of conflict. He repeats his
"truth" over and over and over and over and is met by the usual
disagreement from others who try really really really really hard to
straighten him out...but, alas, to no avail.
(One has to wonder what the next conflict will be when posters tire of
correcting the eternally-uncorrectable george.)
Hey, conflict is conflict. And the newsgroup post count continues to
grow...
lol
george
lol I'm not in conflict nor have I tried to straighten anyone out.
Others might not like my ideas but since I only talk about myself a
question I would ask is why since I'm not telling anyone else they are
wrong or how to live their lives.
Carrie
I think you are the only one looking for and seeing conflict.
MikeRyder
Oh i KNOW i KNOW! lol
Unfortunately, at the bottom line disagreement IS conflict. The
"newest" regular's disagreement with ol' george's "knowledge of all"
IS conflict. And that conflict is increaing the message count.
Hey, i didnt say conflict was bad. I'm just keeping it..."real."
lol
MikeRyder
Gettin' a little paranoid there, georgie? lol
george
It isn't conflict to me. Just because I believe something doesn't mean
I ask anyone else to do the same nor do I choose to disagree with
others choices or paths. If I'm not telling anyone else how to live or
what to think, how can that be conflict as I'm only talking about
myself, my thoughts and my actions? Conflict is only in the mind of
the thinker that wants it.
MikeRyder
<georgec...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Nov 14, 4:21�pm, MikeRyder <n...@nospam.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:46:30 -0500, "Carrie"
>>
>>
>>
>> <starchild1...@charter.net> wrote:
>> >MikeRyder wrote:
>> >> Let's see, how is the eternal newsgroup conflict shaping up now? For
>> >> now ol' george seems to be at the center of conflict. He repeats his
>> >> "truth" over and over and over and over and is met by the usual
>> >> disagreement from others who try really really really really hard to
>> >> straighten him out...but, alas, to no avail.
>>
>> >> (One has to wonder what the next conflict will be when posters tire of
>> >> correcting the eternally-uncorrectable george.)
>>
>> >> Hey, conflict is conflict. And the newsgroup post count continues to
>> >> grow...
>>
>> >> lol
>>
>> > I think you are the only one looking for and seeing conflict.
>>
>> Oh i KNOW i KNOW! lol
>>
>> Unfortunately, at the bottom line disagreement IS conflict. The
>> "newest" regular's disagreement with ol' george's "knowledge of all"
>> IS conflict. And that conflict is increaing the message count.
>>
>> Hey, i didnt say conflict was bad. I'm just keeping it..."real."
>>
>> lol
>
>It isn't conflict to me blah blah blah.
Happy
MikeRyder
You disagree with me. Therefore, by the strict definition of the word
"conflict" you are in conflict with me. Further, you're in denial of
the conflict by your "spiritual pronouncement" that..."conflict is not
real". If this were the truth--your truth--you simply wouldnt be
interested in correcting me. Therefore, "conflict is not real" is
simply your intellectualized "spiritual" concept. Your spiritual
philosophy. Conflict IS real to you even when you pontificate acim
philosophy in a reply to me the nature of which is disagreement.
It is this kind of thing that has always driven the newsgroup. Someone
posts his or her take on a course concept, someone replies,
disagreeing with the person's take, and conflict is up and running
again. And only the intensity of the conflict varies with
each...debate, I'll call it.
This said, contrast it with the following: A person posts his or her
thought on a course concept and another replies saying, "I agree
100%". Where does the...discussion...go from there? The answer:
nowhere. The original poster might agree with the second poster's
agreement to the tune of a quick three or four post discussion, but
then the discussion dies out--even before it got off the ground.
What would make the discussion a discussion is if a thrid person were
to chime in saying, "I disagree." Conflict has ramped itself up again
and a discussion ensues.
Conflict is therefore at the heart of this newsgroup. The newsgroup
thrives on conflict.
Would you are to disagree with me?
Happy
It doesn't really matter if I agree with you or not. Conflict is not
true.
MikeRyder
So, you continue to disagree with me...making conflict real.
Happy
You have more than enough opposing thoughts in your head to to keep
the idea of conflict real for yourself.
But if you want to try and include my in that confusion I'll have to
agree/disagree with you.
LOL
MikeRyder
Ahhhh, the usual newsgroup mind reading trick.
When is happy (slave) going to get it that he/she cant read minds?
Answer: probably never.
lol
Happy
> When is happy (slave) going to get it that he/she cant read minds?
I don't have to read your mind you're spilling it all over the NG
When are you going to figure out that you can't read gender nor
personality?
>Answer: probably never.
LOL
MikeRyder
<happyd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> When is happy (slave) going to get it that he/she cant read minds?
>
>I don't have to read your mind you're spilling it all over the NG
Wrongo. I'm "spilling" words "all over the ng."
>
>
>When are you going to figure out that you can't read gender nor
>personality?
>
Very telling, Slave. You suggest *I* cant read personality. Yet you
see to be claiming you can read MY personality. Wow. You must have a
great power that I dont possess myself.
I've read some (not much) of your fluff before. Here's my suggestion:
Get yourself a nice. long, flowing holy robe, then climb a tall
mountain (with a stormy lightning-filled sky as a backdrop, of
course), and have someone take the picture of a "great holy man."
How'm I doin'?
Happy
> Very telling, Slave. You suggest *I* cant read personality.
>Yet you
> see to be claiming you can read MY personality. Wow. You must have a
> great power that I dont possess myself.
> I've read some (not much) of your fluff before.
>
> How'm I doin'?
Pretty poor since I'm not Happyslave.
Carrie
I believe this is HappyDreamin. Unless it's HappySlave pretending to be
Happy Dreamin.
Two different people.
ellie
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:26:57 -0800 (PST), Happy
>
Happyslave and happydreamin are not the same person, Mike.
deb
"Carrie" <starch...@charter.net> wrote in message
news:%foMm.12215$Sw5....@newsfe16.iad...
>
Isn't Happydreamin also CIAR? It's so simple to just be One. :)
MikeRyder
Hell, you're not even happy.
MikeRyder
Well, what do *I* know.
MikeRyder
Who then is happydreamin'? And who is happy slave?
Also, Who is on first.
What?
No, What is on second. WHO is on first. And happydreamin' (apostrophe)
is playin' (apostrophe) in the parking lot.
MikeRyder
Who's One?
On second thought i dont want to know.
Happy
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:41:24 -0500, "Carrie"
>
>
>
>
>
> <starchild1...@charter.net> wrote:
> >MikeRyder wrote:
> >> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 06:48:14 -0800 (PST), Happy
Like I said.
LOL
Happy
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:37:30 -0800 (PST), Happy
Oh I'm Happy, the whole monkey on a stick thing made sure of that.
Carrie
Not sure.
I think one time he was going to sue someone for using his artist wife's
angel painting without permission, and his (and her) personal information
was posted.
He doesn't seem like the same Happydreamin from years ago. Who seemed
more peaceful, and well... happy.
Anyone can put any email address they want on their profile info. It
doesn't have to be real and can even be someone else's. Except maybe on
google groups.
Happy
> deb wrote:
> > "Carrie" <starchild1...@charter.net> wrote in message
> >news:%foMm.12215$Sw5....@newsfe16.iad...
> >> MikeRyder wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 06:48:14 -0800 (PST), Happy
More peaceful LOL Maybe in contrast to all of the Holy Wars going on
around here.
I am the same. HappyD aka CIAR ~ Deb is right..
Carrie
LOL
MikeRyder
Oh? Are you seeing holy wars going on here...happy?
Holy wars = conflict.
Ergo, you see (and i suspect love) conflict.
MikeRyder
Bicker bicker.
LOL
Happy
I ment back in the day before I attained my present enlightened
state.
;-)
MikeRyder
So you're "enlightened" now, are you?
deb
"Happy" <happyd...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4e550b84-5c18-43fa...@f20g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
I thought I recognized you. :)) Holy wars are so boring, I'd rather talk
about nothing. LOL
Happy
> "Happy" <happydrea...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
Oh I've got plenty of nothing to say myself if you need to to not add
anything.
MikeRyder
You've been doing a good job of that the past couple days.