Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion All is not what it seems...........
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Rod  
View profile  
 More options Jan 22 2004, 1:39 am
Newsgroups: talk.religion.bahai
From: kash...@tpg.com.au (Rod)
Date: 21 Jan 2004 22:39:39 -0800
Local: Thurs, Jan 22 2004 1:39 am
Subject: Re: All is not what it seems...........

"Mark" <rifn...@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message <news:400f0bf4$0$4047$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>...
> Just as a  another snipit of info............. not all Baha'is give a squat
> what Susie says.

Your right Mark...there are two, perhaps three, who over the years have
cared and responded to her abhorent behaviour....the rest, as you observe,
don't give a shit and will let her (and those like her) get away with
anything. No allegation from Susan is to big or to bogus for the majority
to ignore.

> She doesn't represent me and or any Baha'is that I know.

I disagree...and my disagreement is based on years of online discussions
in which Susans propensity to accuse (openly or through innuendo)is reflected
by other fundamentalist Baha'is. So too the evasiveness, the glib, trite
smarmy non answer, the drive by 'blipvert' of one line innuendo, the refusal
to stand and defend/justify/explain any attack or allegation, the retreat
into cowards killfile when her dishonesty is exposed.....all these are
common features of what has been described as the Baha'i Technique. I
did not believe such a phenomena could exist when I first came online...
today the evidence is irrefutable and undeniable.

Susan M perfectly reflects all that is worst about contemporary
Baha'i culture...'they' know it and love her for it.

> I get the feeling that Susie thinks she represents the Baha'is in some way or
> another.

No....Manic and fundamentalist co workers do not simply "represent" the
Baha'i community...they *ARE* the community...their identification is
total/complete. Any criticism of any aspect of Baha'i is percieved by
Manic and Co as a direct personal attack and they respond by attacking
the individual rather than the arguement. They will invent and
manufacture 'enemies of the faith', 'voilators of the Covenant' and
even stoop to open allegations of criminal activity.

The AO cannot possibly be deaf, dumb and blind to this activity any
more than the online Baha'i gallery and lurkers are blind to it.
It is granted approuval, formal or informal, open or tacit...it matters
not.

> but the truth is apparent...Susie only represents herself.

The truth is apparent in examination of the facts...the facts are
available in review of the archives...the archives reveal incident
after incident/event after event in which Susan (or co fundamentalist)
levels a basless and unprovoked serious allegation, refuses substantiation,
hides behind glib and evasive bullshit and/or killfile and receives
open or tacit support for doing so.

Susan represents a prevailing culture of abuse, slander, denial and
evasion.

> I represent myself...........etc.

No....you represent the first Baha'i bunny in donkeys ages to step
forward raise tentative and mild objection...if you dare stay out and
on your horse they will get you for your antipodean audacity....mate.

Rod.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.