The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Newsgroups: talk.religion.bahai
From: kash...@tpg.com.au (Rod)
Date: 21 Jan 2004 22:39:39 -0800
Local: Thurs, Jan 22 2004 1:39 am
Subject: Re: All is not what it seems...........
"Mark" <rifn...@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message <news:400f0bf4$0$4047$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>... Your right Mark...there are two, perhaps three, who over the years have > Just as a another snipit of info............. not all Baha'is give a squat > what Susie says. cared and responded to her abhorent behaviour....the rest, as you observe, don't give a shit and will let her (and those like her) get away with anything. No allegation from Susan is to big or to bogus for the majority to ignore. > She doesn't represent me and or any Baha'is that I know. I disagree...and my disagreement is based on years of online discussions in which Susans propensity to accuse (openly or through innuendo)is reflected by other fundamentalist Baha'is. So too the evasiveness, the glib, trite smarmy non answer, the drive by 'blipvert' of one line innuendo, the refusal to stand and defend/justify/explain any attack or allegation, the retreat into cowards killfile when her dishonesty is exposed.....all these are common features of what has been described as the Baha'i Technique. I did not believe such a phenomena could exist when I first came online... today the evidence is irrefutable and undeniable. Susan M perfectly reflects all that is worst about contemporary > I get the feeling that Susie thinks she represents the Baha'is in some way or No....Manic and fundamentalist co workers do not simply "represent" the > another. Baha'i community...they *ARE* the community...their identification is total/complete. Any criticism of any aspect of Baha'i is percieved by Manic and Co as a direct personal attack and they respond by attacking the individual rather than the arguement. They will invent and manufacture 'enemies of the faith', 'voilators of the Covenant' and even stoop to open allegations of criminal activity. The AO cannot possibly be deaf, dumb and blind to this activity any > but the truth is apparent...Susie only represents herself. The truth is apparent in examination of the facts...the facts are available in review of the archives...the archives reveal incident after incident/event after event in which Susan (or co fundamentalist) levels a basless and unprovoked serious allegation, refuses substantiation, hides behind glib and evasive bullshit and/or killfile and receives open or tacit support for doing so. Susan represents a prevailing culture of abuse, slander, denial and > I represent myself...........etc. No....you represent the first Baha'i bunny in donkeys ages to step forward raise tentative and mild objection...if you dare stay out and on your horse they will get you for your antipodean audacity....mate. Rod. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||