#DESPERATE JESUIT TRIES TO MAKE EXCUSES FOR 911 TRAGEDY GETTING IN!!
Susan Williams
fact that Terrorists staged a daring attacking during 911 involving
planes traveling awesome distances into the most controlled airspace
in America as if they knew the plan would go through.
Watch!...
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:36:31 -0500, an0...@hotmail.com wrote:
>On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:40:29 -0500, Susan Williams
><SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 07:08:16 -0500, an0...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 00:00:34 -0500, Susan Williams
>>><SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 16:44:27 -0500, an0...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:01:13 -0500, Susan Williams
>>>>><SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 07:19:08 -0500, an0...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 00:49:10 -0500, Susan Williams
>>>>>>><SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 17:02:08 -0500, an0...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 13:03:02 -0500, Susan Williams
>>>>>>>>><SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>STUPID AMERICANS!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>What this fool forgets is the simple fact that until 9-11 hijackers
>>>>>>>>>were to be dealt with by cooperating with them, and allowing them to
>>>>>>>>>to go where they wanted.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Of course it didn't take long for that policy to go away, in
>>>>>>>>>fact...THAT VERY MORNING Flt 93 was the first hijacked plane that
>>>>>>>>>didn't adhere to that policy.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Oh, and the writer of the post is a bufoon.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Why thank you Jesuit!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Nope. Not Christian. Wrong again!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>But Jesuit, isn't it great that the terrorists knew ahead of time they
>>>>>>would be able to penetrate American systems from so great a distance?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I didn't know I was that good! Especially with
>>>>>>>>your usual proof!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I see reading comprehension is another of your shortcomings...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Be careful of me. I don't just give empty accusations like you Opus
>>>>>>Deiites.
>>>>>
>>>>>Just empty thoughts and silly repetitions then?
>>>>
>>>>You mean like you Jesuits that keep trailing empty thoughts and silly
>>>>repetitions and don't engage in the facts?
>>>
>>>What's a Jesuit?
>>
>>What's a daring terror attack at 911 done as if the terrorists knew it
>>would go through?
>
>Didn't understand the question, huh? What is a Jesuit??
Didn't understand the meaning of the header of the thread, huh Jesuit?
What's the point of the thread you are working so hard to smother out?
>>>>Years, no answer to why you Jesuits trail only our posts claiming them
>>>>to be weird as if weird posts are not found all over the internet.
>>>
>>>Ding dong!
>>
>>Obviously my posts are the only insane ones that are true?
>
>LOL Your posts make as much sense as John Kerry's positions on the
>issues....
You mean like the malarky you Jesuits bring that we have a right to
disagree?
LOL.. You neglect your children to remain here and have the Jesuit
wind-up key to follow the Jesuit Oath. Wasn't this point mentioned
before. Why did you lie again? If my posts don't make sense why are
you a Vatican psychiatrist to know you have to trail them to smother
them out for dear life?
>>You claim sanity as the other Jesuits, yet you now confess you are a
>>ding dong and avoid the issues.
>
>No, I am saying YOU are a ding dong!
I'm saying YOU are a Jesuit. Now that statement is true!
What is a person who trails ding dongs, then? A ding dong Jesuit
bell?
>>>>We don't bow to your despotism nor censorship in pretense you don't
>>>>support censorship.
>>>
>>>Who's "we"? Do you refer to those voices in your head too?
>>
>>We don't bow to your despotism nor censorship in pretense you don't
>>support censorship.
>
>We? How many voices do you hear? Do they have names? Do you like
>them? Do they scare you?
Overcome your fear of one "ding dong" first before you discuss with
me, Jesuit!
>>>>>>But Jesuit, isn't it great that the terrorists knew ahead of time they
>>>>>>would be able to penetrate American systems from so great a distance?
>>>>>
>>>>>Speaking of repetition.....
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Nifty that the hijackers knew they could pull off such a stunt and
>>>>>>>>didn't even bother to fly the planes out of New York. Not even one!
>>>>
>>>>I will repeat anything that is not answered by the new fangled New
>>>>World order psychiatrists.
>>>
>>>Of which I am sure you have been introduced to many of them.
>>
>>Wasn't it nifty that terrorists like you were able to stage such a
>>daring attack on 911 involving planes flying from long distances AS IF
>>THEY KNEW IT WOULD GO THROUGH?
>
>You pays your money, you takes your chances. The same (wierd)
>question could be asked of the Japanese when they attacked Pearl
>harbor ( I think).
You mean like my question of why you self-appointed psychiatrists
accusing everyone of mental problems who disagrees with you then
always trail our posts to smother them out for dear life after posting
that our posts are nonsense as your only defense on issues?
You think? They had radar and other sophisticated devices to tell
what was coming during WWII? Surely just the reason you didn't even
attempt to answer till now proves you never had an argument!
>>The words are plain. Jesuits can't see it except when they struggle
>>to divert from it as thou.
>
>Thou? Forsooth? Ye nay and doubtest?
The words are plain. Jesuits can't see it except when they struggle
to divert from it as thou.
>>>>Just like strange posters repeat similar attacks year after year
>>>>without engaging in the issues and become psychiatrists.
>>>
>>>LOL Maybe they're trying to tell you something........?
>>
>>I know I'm posting the truth already. You don't have to join them
>>telling me that.
>
>We?
Remember, as you have said, we are insane to you and other strange
Jesuits who leech onto our posts. We have different priorities enough
for us to understand what is the subject heading of this thread with
its concern and what it means.
>>>>>>>I see sanity is also not within your grasp.
>>>>
>>>>You mean just because I disagree with you and claim evidence must be
>>>>dealt with instead of bowing to censorship despots?
>>>
>>>No, because you refer to me as "Jesuit". Because you sometimes speak
>>>in third person. Because for all of your words you don't actually SAY
>>>anything.
>>
>>I bet I don't allow others to disagree either, huh Jesuit?
>
>Ding dong!
STUPID AMERICANS!
RRRIIIINGGGG...
RRRIIIINGGGG...
RRRIIIINGGGG...
Terrorist #2:
Hello!
Terrorist #1:
Hello. Muhammad Rachmad?
Muhammad Rachmad:
Yes. Is this Ibrahim?
Ibrahim:
Yes.
Very excited. Want to tell you of new plan. The best thing to do we
conclude is to send our men to America and have them trained to fly
planes. That way they can hijack the planes, and, instead of calling
for a ransom or anything, we can have them use the planes to ram into
buildings.
Muhammad Rachmad:
What are you talking about? We thought of that already. We've been
through that before. It's been 50 years since World War II, and you
know we have not had much success staging terror attacks against the
United States! We were always caught!
Remember also that we understood our plates were full enough with
Israel on our hands? We've already discussed what would be gained
having a super-power to add to our plight. Didn't we discuss this
before?
Ibrahim:
Don't worry. Trust me. Things will be different this time. Yes,
America was impregnable to terror attacks, but that will all change.
Something is different this time.
Muhammad Rachmad:
What is it that is different?
Ibraham:
Nevermind that. Just trust me. We're planning to fly planes from
several locations. Three planes from different cities to fly to New
York. We've decided the best target would be the World Trade Center
buildings.
Muhammad Rachmad:
Where are you planning to fly the planes from?
Ibrahim:
Well, right now we plan one plane to fly from Boston.
Muhammad Rachmad:
Are you mad! You all are telling me you are going to fly planes from
a long distance away in order to crash into two prominent US buildings
in the most controlled airspace in the country?! YOU ALL HAVE LOST
IT!
Why can't you hijack the plane from New York itself?!
Ibrahim:
No, don't worry! Trust me! It will go through!
Muhammad Rachmad:
Why are you so sure it will go through? You almost sound as if you
believe the planes would be LET THROUGH!
Ibrahim:
EXACTLY! Trust me! There is great leader who will let the hijacked
planes through!
Muhammad Rachmad:
YOU ARE NUTS! I can't understand what has come over you!
Ibrahim:
WE WOULD NOT DO THIS IF WE DIDN'T KNOW IT WOULD GO THROUGH!
We will even have time to let the passengers call home so that we can
make the situation more distressful to the stupid Americans!
Muhammad Rachmad:
So you have connections with the Americans?
Ibrahim:
Put it this way. If we fail, we would be the laughing stock of all
Islam to pull off such a feat from a great distance. Trust me: IT
WILL GO THROUGH! There is great leader in American who will help us!
Not only that, I bet you even after that, the stupid Americans will
re-elect that great leader claiming him to be a protector from
terrorism!
Muhammad Rachmad:
You think the Americans are that stupid??
Ibrahim:
You watch and see. DON'T WORRY! YOU JUST TRUST ME! We're not
talking about the British here. We're talking about the Americans!
Hey, gotta go. I think I'm being watched...
Click...
>
>>What do these words mean then that you avoid...
>>
>>Wasn't it nifty that terrorists like you were able to stage such a
>>daring attack on 911 involving planes flying from long distances AS IF
>>THEY KNEW IT WOULD GO THROUGH?
>
>Repeat yourself much? Did a nasty Jesuit touch your secret places?
STUPID AMERICANS!
RRRIIIINGGGG...
RRRIIIINGGGG...
RRRIIIINGGGG...
Terrorist #2:
Hello!
Terrorist #1:
Hello. Muhammad Rachmad?
Muhammad Rachmad:
Yes. Is this Ibrahim?
Ibrahim:
Yes.
Very excited. Want to tell you of new plan. The best thing to do we
conclude is to send our men to America and have them trained to fly
planes. That way they can hijack the planes, and, instead of calling
for a ransom or anything, we can have them use the planes to ram into
buildings.
Muhammad Rachmad:
What are you talking about? We thought of that already. We've been
through that before. It's been 50 years since World War II, and you
know we have not had much success staging terror attacks against the
United States! We were always caught!
Remember also that we understood our plates were full enough with
Israel on our hands? We've already discussed what would be gained
having a super-power to add to our plight. Didn't we discuss this
before?
Ibrahim:
Don't worry. Trust me. Things will be different this time. Yes,
America was impregnable to terror attacks, but that will all change.
Something is different this time.
Muhammad Rachmad:
What is it that is different?
Ibraham:
Nevermind that. Just trust me. We're planning to fly planes from
several locations. Three planes from different cities to fly to New
York. We've decided the best target would be the World Trade Center
buildings.
Muhammad Rachmad:
Where are you planning to fly the planes from?
Ibrahim:
Well, right now we plan one plane to fly from Boston.
Muhammad Rachmad:
Are you mad! You all are telling me you are going to fly planes from
a long distance away in order to crash into two prominent US buildings
in the most controlled airspace in the country?! YOU ALL HAVE LOST
IT!
Why can't you hijack the plane from New York itself?!
Ibrahim:
No, don't worry! Trust me! It will go through!
Muhammad Rachmad:
Why are you so sure it will go through? You almost sound as if you
believe the planes would be LET THROUGH!
Ibrahim:
EXACTLY! Trust me! There is great leader who will let the hijacked
planes through!
Muhammad Rachmad:
YOU ARE NUTS! I can't understand what has come over you!
Ibrahim:
WE WOULD NOT DO THIS IF WE DIDN'T KNOW IT WOULD GO THROUGH!
We will even have time to let the passengers call home so that we can
make the situation more distressful to the stupid Americans!
Muhammad Rachmad:
So you have connections with the Americans?
Ibrahim:
Put it this way. If we fail, we would be the laughing stock of all
Islam to pull off such a feat from a great distance. Trust me: IT
WILL GO THROUGH! There is great leader in American who will help us!
Not only that, I bet you even after that, the stupid Americans will
re-elect that great leader claiming him to be a protector from
terrorism!
Muhammad Rachmad:
You think the Americans are that stupid??
Ibrahim:
You watch and see. DON'T WORRY! YOU JUST TRUST ME! We're not
talking about the British here. We're talking about the Americans!
Hey, gotta go. I think I'm being watched...
Click...
In His Grace,
Susan
NEXT...
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:31:42 -0500, an0...@hotmail.com wrote:
>On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:34:21 -0500, Susan Williams
><SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 07:19:08 -0500, an0...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 00:49:10 -0500, Susan Williams
>>><SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 17:02:08 -0500, an0...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 13:03:02 -0500, Susan Williams
>>>>><SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>STUPID AMERICANS!
>>>>>
>>>>>What this fool forgets is the simple fact that until 9-11 hijackers
>>>>>were to be dealt with by cooperating with them, and allowing them to
>>>>>to go where they wanted.
>>>>>
>>>>>Of course it didn't take long for that policy to go away, in
>>>>>fact...THAT VERY MORNING Flt 93 was the first hijacked plane that
>>>>>didn't adhere to that policy.
>>>>>
>>>>>Oh, and the writer of the post is a bufoon.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Why thank you Jesuit!
>>>
>>>Nope. Not Christian. Wrong again!
>>
>>Ok, thank you Opus Deiite!
>
>Glad to see you admit your errors. Here's another. it's spelled
>"diety".
JESUIT!
>>>>I didn't know I was that good! Especially with
>>>>your usual proof!
>>>
>>>I see reading comprehension is another of your shortcomings...
>>
>>I don't go by what a killer sees.
>
>You don't go by reality, huh? Who's watching you?
JESUIT!
Learn about the super-terrorist killers who also now control the
government from the Jack Chick website:
>>>>Nifty that the hijackers knew they could pull off such a stunt and
>>>>didn't even bother to fly the planes out of New York. Not even one!
>>>
>>>I see sanity is also not within your grasp.
>>
>>Tell us about your sanity that makes you join so many others
>>neglecting your kids to constantly reply only to singular "insane"
>>posts as if such posts are not found all over the internet.
>
>If you have children I suggest you might want to give them to soneone
>who can take care of them...
Ding dong!
JESUIT!
>>Tell us about your sanity in, like the others, failing to answer just
>>this one question.
>
>What question? Is the question "Did a Jesuit molest you"?
Ding Dong
JESUIT!
>>>>I love you too!
>>>
>>>I love you more! ..mean it!
>>
>>You're a Jesuit!
>
>Ding dong!
JESUIT!
Ding dong!
>>What education did you give us here? What is the answer to the
>>points.
>
>You have to figure out the answers to my points yourself.
Why would you expect someone you claim is insane, as usual when you
are a Jesuit telling us you support the right to disagree, to figure
out things?
JESUIT!
Ding dong!
>>What did we learn about the hijackers pulling off the daring
>>911 stunt as if they knew it would go through followed by your empty
>>diversions around the point.
Watch now as the Jesuit was using his tiny "ding dongs" all this time
because he desperately wanted to cover over his lack of intelligence
on the matter, make an attempt...
>As previously stated, the policy towards hijackers was to let them
>have their way, and allow them to divert the aircraft to wherever they
>wanted to go. Since 9-11 that policy has changed. Many of the
>changes in this policy are reflected in readily seen differences. A
>small example is the loss of the curtain that used to separate 1st
>class from coach. Don't fly much, huh?
In other words, all the planes wound up being ESCORTED, but the
escorts came to the conclusion to let the planes do what they want
even after they started to fly real low, low, low...
How much lower can Jesuits get?
>>
>>>>
>>>>In His Grace,
>>>
>>>Who's grace?
>>
>>In His Grace for the issues evaded by the super-terrorists of the
>>Pope,
>
>Answer the question. In who's grace?
Ding dong!
>My grace? Your grace?
Jesuit grace?
Ding dong!
If the Jesuit had a point he would know the priority of the thread!
>On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:44:32 -0500, Susan Williams
><SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:06:52 GMT, "Paul Broadway"
>><sd...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>><an0...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:obq2l01qo5c84mev9...@4ax.com...
>>>> On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 00:00:34 -0500, Susan Williams
>>>
>>>An00nie, you know Susan is one of those people who took the short bus to
>>>school don't you?
>>
>>Why is that bus filled with damned Jesuit psychiatrists ignoring the
>>entire internet of weird posts?
>>
>>Jesuit, what can you do about your hate?
>>
>>>She is obviously disturbed and on a Xian kick.
>>
>>Just because a damned Jesuit says so?
>>
>>Isn't it nifty that terrorists were able to fly planes from long
>>distances to commit 911 as if they knew it would go through, and this
>>causes Jesuit psychiatrists to trail someone constantly on a short
>>bus?
>>
>>>If you
>>>expect real discussion from her, you are going to be disappointed, she views
>>>you as a Jesuit, I guess a Xian priest.
>>
>>Discussion? I keep asking this...
>>
>>Isn't it nifty that terrorists were able to fly planes from long
>>distances to commit 911 as if they knew it would go through, and this
>>causes Jesuit psychiatrists to trail someone constantly on a short
>>bus?
>>
>>Why do psychiatrists from hell keep following me on my short bus?
>
>They are government agents DISGUISED as psychiatrists....
The point you are struggling to smother out with your Jesuit arts are
above.
>Watching you, Susan Williams. Reading your thoughts. Feeding those
>thoughts into the Cray computers.....
>
>Do you know what happens after that.........?
I post the point again:
STUPID AMERICANS!
RRRIIIINGGGG...
RRRIIIINGGGG...
RRRIIIINGGGG...
Terrorist #2:
Hello!
Terrorist #1:
Hello. Muhammad Rachmad?
Muhammad Rachmad:
Yes. Is this Ibrahim?
Ibrahim:
Yes.
Very excited. Want to tell you of new plan. The best thing to do we
conclude is to send our men to America and have them trained to fly
planes. That way they can hijack the planes, and, instead of calling
for a ransom or anything, we can have them use the planes to ram into
buildings.
Muhammad Rachmad:
What are you talking about? We thought of that already. We've been
through that before. It's been 50 years since World War II, and you
know we have not had much success staging terror attacks against the
United States! We were always caught!
Remember also that we understood our plates were full enough with
Israel on our hands? We've already discussed what would be gained
having a super-power to add to our plight. Didn't we discuss this
before?
Ibrahim:
Don't worry. Trust me. Things will be different this time. Yes,
America was impregnable to terror attacks, but that will all change.
Something is different this time.
Muhammad Rachmad:
What is it that is different?
Ibraham:
Nevermind that. Just trust me. We're planning to fly planes from
several locations. Three planes from different cities to fly to New
York. We've decided the best target would be the World Trade Center
buildings.
Muhammad Rachmad:
Where are you planning to fly the planes from?
Ibrahim:
Well, right now we plan one plane to fly from Boston.
Muhammad Rachmad:
Are you mad! You all are telling me you are going to fly planes from
a long distance away in order to crash into two prominent US buildings
in the most controlled airspace in the country?! YOU ALL HAVE LOST
IT!
Why can't you hijack the plane from New York itself?!
Ibrahim:
No, don't worry! Trust me! It will go through!
Muhammad Rachmad:
Why are you so sure it will go through? You almost sound as if you
believe the planes would be LET THROUGH!
Ibrahim:
EXACTLY! Trust me! There is great leader who will let the hijacked
planes through!
Muhammad Rachmad:
YOU ARE NUTS! I can't understand what has come over you!
Ibrahim:
WE WOULD NOT DO THIS IF WE DIDN'T KNOW IT WOULD GO THROUGH!
We will even have time to let the passengers call home so that we can
make the situation more distressful to the stupid Americans!
Muhammad Rachmad:
So you have connections with the Americans?
Ibrahim:
Put it this way. If we fail, we would be the laughing stock of all
Islam to pull off such a feat from a great distance. Trust me: IT
WILL GO THROUGH! There is great leader in American who will help us!
Not only that, I bet you even after that
Not only that, I bet you even after that, the stupid Americans will
re-elect that great leader claiming him to be a protector from
terrorism!
Muhammad Rachmad:
You think the Americans are that stupid??
Ibrahim:
You watch and see. DON'T WORRY! YOU JUST TRUST ME! We're not
talking about the British here. We're talking about the Americans!
Hey, gotta go. I think I'm being watched.
ibm
Susan Williams wrote:
> I, Susan Williams, was again confronted with Jesuit excuses for the
> fact that Terrorists staged a daring attacking during 911 involving
> planes traveling awesome distances into the most controlled airspace
> in America as if they knew the plan would go through.
OODA.
Al-Qaeda got inside the loop on 2001/09/11.
That won't happen again.
Mind you efforts to prevent other things happening are
continually hampered by the Dhimmicrips trying to run
interference for one or the other of their client groups.
> Watch!...
Oh we'll watch with somewhat the same fascinated amusement
one gets watching a snake stalk a rodent.
IBM
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
Don
news:fuh7l0he2502u39s4...@4ax.com...
> I, Susan Williams, was again confronted with Jesuit excuses for the
> fact that Terrorists staged a daring attacking during 911 involving
> planes traveling awesome distances into the most controlled airspace
> in America as if they knew the plan would go through.
But where is the evidence that the Jesuits were involved?
regards
Don
GoatChomper
Don <d...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:cj3ugt$d8e$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...
Entirely within Williams' disturbed mind.
Susan Williams
You mean aside from telling us America must be "pre-emptive" contrary
to the Constitution, and yet they still make sure they ignore Ted
Seeber and Teresita who boldly posted that all non-Catholics must die
while supporting President Bush?
They only attacked us for exposing them, giving us the constant
accusation of hatred. Many of them claim to be Baptists, Adventists,
Lutherans, etc.
Does that make sense?
In His Grace,
Susan
x-- 100 Proof News - http://www.100ProofNews.com
x-- 3,500+ Binary NewsGroups, and over 90,000 other groups
x-- Access to over 1 Terabyte per Day - $8.95/Month
x-- UNLIMITED DOWNLOAD
Susan Williams
This is also a Jesuit. What can such do when they don't have an
argument? That's much only of what we get, for when they attempt to
use reason, we demonstrate their arguments to be so ludicrous that it
actually appears to even give them a conscience.
All we get are these blowhard lying remarks and they keep accusing us
of not allowing others to disagree with us. Why then didn't they
notice others posting how all non-Catholics must die just for
disagreeing in matters of religion?
GoatChomper, as a sensible name that matches his character:
I ask again: Ted Seeber and Teresita posted that all non-Catholics
must die. Please demonstrate your Jesuit psychiatry to us by ignoring
this and attacking us for being upset about it.
The world needs to know you Jesuits.
Don
> The world needs to know you Jesuits.
Actually, I am a Dominican.
regards
Don
Susan Williams
Why do you people believe all non-Catholics must die? Why do you
still believe that showing how you get angry at us for condemning your
friends who posted that on the internet?
Still, the planes flew low with no airports around. A great leader
let them through and now claims to be the deterent and protector from
terrorism just so long as we make him a dictator.
That dictator called Jose Maria Escriva a saint, and he is the founder
of your order.
Why does Bush believe all non-Catholics must die and that liberty is a
bad thing?
Don
> Why do you people believe all non-Catholics must die? Why do you
> still believe that showing how you get angry at us for condemning your
> friends who posted that on the internet?
I think you must have misunderstood what I wrote.
I believe all people must die. This phenomenon is known as mortality and we
all go through it. I have never supposed that only non-Catholics are
susceptible. I also firmly believe that in the end of the day God has little
interest in denominations. I don't know if that little piece of theology is
of comfort to you, but I hope it is. I consider that petty
interdenominational sqaubbling is precisely the sort of bigotted tribal
behaviour that brings religion into disrepute. Stability and peace within
society are a much more fitting offering to God in my humble opinion.
I believe that if you look at my posting you will see that I have
demonstrated no anger towards you. Nor do I feel any such emotion towards
you. My initial offering was intended to be light hearted and to diffuse the
acrimony which was gathering in this string.
However, I do object lightheartedly to your use of the term "Jesuit". I
think the term you wish is "Jesuitical". A Jesuit is a member of the Society
of Jesus. I am aware that in some communities the term "Jesuit" is used for
"Jesuitical" but strictly it is incorrect although it is included in some
dictionaries. I have no desire to be associated with the Loyolan cohort.
But there are other aspects of the string which I find a little uninformed.
It is suggested that the aircraft travelled "awesome distances into the most
controlled airspace". The reality is that they did not travel very far in
terms of time standing their velocity. And the reference to "controlled
airspace" appears to be misunderstood. Such airspace simply means that it is
not available for uncontrolled visual flight rules flight within certain
parameters. For example in some parts of controlled airspace, you may fly at
certain heights without keeping in radio contact with air traffic control
while in other parts keeping in radio contact is mandatory. Controlled
airspace does not necessarily mean that an air traffic controller is telling
the pilot where and how to fly.
You also say that "the planes flew low with no airports around". Neither of
these points is accurate. Standing the close proximity of LaGuardia airport,
it would not have been at all surprising that passenger aircraft were flying
on the flight path and level that they were. I doubt if anyone had noticed
anything unusual until the impact or do you have information to the
contrary.
I do not believe that Bush, the Jesuits, or the Jews were responsible for
the incidents. The mass of evidence indicates that Osama Bin Laden's
organisation was solely responsible for the planning and execution of this
outrage.
However, indirectly Bush must carry some blame since American foreign policy
and economic policy will not stop the meddling in middle eastern affairs
particularly in Saudi, Israel, Afghanistan and now Uzbekhistan and Iraq to
mention but a few. This meddling has always been seen as unwanted and
provocative. The outcome, which was predictable, is that the middle east is
now even more unstable politically, and Al Qaida and Hamas are more popular
than ever. The whole thrust of american foreign policy in this area is
misguided.
> That dictator called Jose Maria Escriva a saint, and he is the founder
> of your order.
Again you seem confused. JME was not a dictator, so far as I am aware. The
organisation he founded was Opus Dei. I don't think he had any Jesuit
connections did he?
> Why does Bush believe all non-Catholics must die and that liberty is a
> bad thing?
I would be most surprised if Bush thought that. I have always taken him to
be a non-Catholic. I am prepared to admit he has a bit of a death wish on
the international stage. As to liberty, it is an axiom of political science
that politicians like to centralise power onto themselves. You can't really
be surprised whem a politician does this. In a sense it is a form of honest
to be blatant about it. The fact that at the same time it offends liberty
is, as the Angelic Doctor, Thomas Aquinas would have put it, an unwanted
double effect. By the way, Aquinas was a Dominican.
regards
Don
Kenna
to do with the 911 tragedy. I mean I've heard of conspiracy theories
and all but this one is well just plain insane.
And the points being made about "killing all non catholics" etc etc,
I've never heard so much garbage in my life. Just because some retard
posts some silly statement on this message board does'nt mean it
etched in stone as a cold hard fact. One of my good friends is a
Catholic and has never once tried to kill me. ;-)
There are no grand conspiracy theories people...... there are no
Jesuits, Papists, Right Wing extremists, Jews or Purple Bunnies trying
to arrange for mass tragedies to occur
I really worry about the fact some of you out there are not
maintaining your dosages out there people!!!!!!!
Anyway is'nt this suppoed to be about political theory? Maybe it's
because I'm downunder at the mo' but am I right in thinking the
Northern Hemisphere has totally lost the plot.
Try and keep it together people!
Susan Williams
>I am totally confused about this post. What in hell has a few monks
>to do with the 911 tragedy. I mean I've heard of conspiracy theories
>and all but this one is well just plain insane.
>
>And the points being made about "killing all non catholics" etc etc,
>I've never heard so much garbage in my life.
WAIT A MINUTE MONK! Why not just ask to see the post where other
Monks have posted that all non-Catholics must die, so that you can
only attack those upset about it? That would be much better than
taking a Mydol.
Here now comes the typical damned terrorist psychiatrists...
>Just because some retard
>posts some silly statement on this message board does'nt mean it
>etched in stone as a cold hard fact.
What then about all these MONKS constantly telling us what REALITY
is??
>One of my good friends is a
>Catholic and has never once tried to kill me. ;-)
Others have posted different Catholics who said all non-Catholics must
die. Anyone concerned over that hasn't killed me!
As any conspirator would conclude...
>There are no grand conspiracy theories people...... there are no
>Jesuits, Papists, Right Wing extremists, Jews or Purple Bunnies trying
>to arrange for mass tragedies to occur
THERE ARE NO PEOPLE OBJECTING TO JESUITS WHO POSTED ALL NON-CATHOLICS
MUST DIE, PEOPLE! They are not flying through the window, hor hiding
under your pillow. DON'T PANIC!
The Jesuit psychiatry board contines WITHOUT EVEN ASKING ABOUT THE
EVIDENCE...
>I really worry about the fact some of you out there are not
>maintaining your dosages out there people!!!!!!!
Will that calm Jesuit down when others are upset about death mandates
boldly posted on the internet!!!
>Anyway is'nt this suppoed to be about political theory? Maybe it's
>because I'm downunder at the mo' but am I right in thinking the
>Northern Hemisphere has totally lost the plot.
What, they believe all non-Catholics must die also?
>Try and keep it together people!
We are! GO TO THE EVIDENCE AND COMMENT! MAKE A COMPARISON TO THE
POSTS YOU SEE WITH OUR CONCERNS ABOUT IT AS YOU HAVE ALREADY!!...
http://www.snipurl.com/Teresita
Susan Williams
>"Susan Williams" <SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:sj8ml01urdb7ls8sf...@4ax.com...
>
>> Why do you people believe all non-Catholics must die? Why do you
>> still believe that showing how you get angry at us for condemning your
>> friends who posted that on the internet?
>
>I think you must have misunderstood what I wrote.
>
>I believe all people must die.
Osama didn't believe that. You didn't tell Homeland Security this!
Where in the bible did you get this idea? Where does it say this?
What would you do with this belief besides what we see already is your
non-concern that people posted how all non-Catholics must die, but
your reply in concern at those upset about this?
>This phenomenon is known as mortality and we
>all go through it. I have never supposed that only non-Catholics are
>susceptible.
Except that if people post that such must die, it doesn't bother you.
Do you know what an anti-catholic is?
>I also firmly believe that in the end of the day God has little
>interest in denominations.
Naturally, You're a globalist! You wouldn't mind one religious
leader calling all the bigoted shots from above!
>I don't know if that little piece of theology is
>of comfort to you, but I hope it is.
How can I comfort you with my still stoid objection to demons in human
form like you, telling us all non-Catholics must die?
What can I do to comfort you since those declarations did not
DIScomfort you?
I consider that petty
>interdenominational sqaubbling is precisely the sort of bigotted tribal
>behaviour that brings religion into disrepute. Stability and peace within
>society are a much more fitting offering to God in my humble opinion.
>
>I believe that if you look at my posting you will see that I have
>demonstrated no anger towards you.
You know others posted all non-Catholics must die. You know some
object to this, you respond against those who objected and left those
who made the posts, untouched or uncommented upon in their true light
IN HOMELAND SECURITY!
>Nor do I feel any such emotion towards
>you.
The worst killers constantly PROVING what they are, by what they say,
contrary to their ACTIONS!
>My initial offering was intended to be light hearted and to diffuse the
>acrimony which was gathering in this string.
What killer would think people posting how all non-Catholics must die
would upset anyone, IN THIS CLIMATE OF TERRORISM??? What killer would
think a man would be arrested in an airport for joking about a bomb?
>However, I do object lightheartedly to your use of the term "Jesuit".
While acting like a JESUIT, JESUIT?? Multitudes dying is no problem.
You have a concern, Jesuit?
>I think the term you wish is "Jesuitical".
Don't speak for me, JESUIT!
>A Jesuit is a member of the Society
>of Jesus. I am aware that in some communities the term "Jesuit" is used for
>"Jesuitical" but strictly it is incorrect although it is included in some
>dictionaries. I have no desire to be associated with the Loyolan cohort.
Holocausts don't concern you! You being known to be a foot-soldier of
the Pope, does? DON'T TELL ME! YOU'RE A PSYCHIATRIST!
>But there are other aspects of the string which I find a little uninformed.
>It is suggested that the aircraft travelled "awesome distances into the most
>controlled airspace". The reality is that they did not travel very far in
>terms of time standing their velocity.
Jesuits always claim to have the handle on "reality" and then tell
their enemies to surrender their ideas just because others may
disagree!
How long would a plane take to go from Boston to New York City.
How much longer would it take if that plane WAS DIVERTED, traveling
into a much more perpendicular position?
Just letting you see that when a killer speaks, other judgment
disorders will be shown!
>And the reference to "controlled
>airspace" appears to be misunderstood.
But I'm upset about people dying. You claim they should. You're
upset that we know you're a foot-soldier of the POPE!
>Such airspace simply means that it is
>not available for uncontrolled visual flight rules flight within certain
>parameters. For example in some parts of controlled airspace, you may fly at
>certain heights without keeping in radio contact with air traffic control
>while in other parts keeping in radio contact is mandatory. Controlled
>airspace does not necessarily mean that an air traffic controller is telling
>the pilot where and how to fly.
CONTROLLED AIRSPACE. Remaining watched or visible. An excuser of
holocaust is an excuser of killers!
>You also say that "the planes flew low with no airports around". Neither of
>these points is accurate. Standing the close proximity of LaGuardia airport,
>it would not have been at all surprising that passenger aircraft were flying
>on the flight path and level that they were. I doubt if anyone had noticed
>anything unusual until the impact or do you have information to the
>contrary.
WATCH THE VIDEO OF THE PLANES HITTING THE TOWERS AGAIN. TELL US IF
YOU HAVE SEEN PLANES MAKE SUCH LANDINGS TO LAGUARDIA WHILE KNOWN TO BE
HIJACKED FROM THAT POSITION!
What do you expect from someone who fails to teach HOMELAND SECURITY,
that in response to 911, we must understand that people must die???
>I do not believe that Bush, the Jesuits, or the Jews were responsible for
>the incidents.
Which Jesuit would want to condemn himself?
>The mass of evidence indicates that Osama Bin Laden's
>organisation was solely responsible for the planning and execution of this
>outrage.
Why all our lives we never had to worry about terrorism until all
these NEW WORLD ORDER guys came in?
O, Terrorists got SMARTER!! 911 terror attacks, Bush gets stronger
and claims dictatorial power. We see no other creatures in the world
benefitting from this! NOT EVEN OSAMA!
Bush claims all power and then says that even JUDICIAL REVIEW is
disallowed! The entities established to determine the appropriateness
of actions is disallowed!
Terrorists attack Iraqi oil installations. The price of oil goes up.
BUSH GETS STRONGER!! EVERYTHING THEY DO MAKES HIM STRONGER!! Why
stage expensive terror attacks against the only ones who would or
could ever even sympathize with any Arab plight??
Why not just be smarter like the terrorists of yesteryear WHO DIDN'T
LIKE JOHN F. KENNEDY? They know how to make an enemy WEAKER!
Don
> ...
Susan, you are hopelessly confused. I cannot imagine why you wish to deny
your own mortality. Is this some religious belief of yours?
Christians, on the other hand, believe that death is the gateway to the
afterlife. It is a pity that you will not be sharing the afterlife with us.
Or have you simply overlooked your biological limitations?
> You wouldn't mind one religious leader calling all the bigoted shots from
above!
Of course I would mind. I am not a religious fascist. And I wouldn't
tolerate it in others. Not even in you. I cannot imagine anyone telling me
what to believe. I can do it for myself, thank you very much.
So don't put your bigoted, ill informed neuroticisms into my mouth, madam!
What is your expression for this sin? Oh yes, quote "Don't speak for me,
Jesuit!" unquote.
> While acting like a JESUIT, JESUIT?? Multitudes dying is no problem.
> You have a concern, Jesuit?
Of course I am concerned about multitudes dying. Why do you say "Multitudes
dying is no problem"? Do you have no concern for the suffering of God's
children?
> >I think the term you wish is "Jesuitical".
> Don't speak for me, JESUIT!
See what I mean? But if you used the right, unambiguous term in the first
place you would save us all a lot of hassle.
> Terrorists attack Iraqi oil installations. The price of oil goes up.
> BUSH GETS STRONGER!! EVERYTHING THEY DO MAKES HIM STRONGER!!
Yes, it worries me that Bush does seem to be benefiting from this. But then
I have always been against the Iraq war on moral and political grounds - and
I have denounced it vociferously and frequently. Now you, Susan, have the
opportunity to remove Bush from office.
For a while I thought you were serious in your complaints, now I see from
the way you have attacked me without justification that you are simply a
troll.
regards
Don
Susan Williams
>"Susan Williams" <SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:7scrl0tnco4ir5ob8...@4ax.com...
>
>> ...
>
>Susan, you are hopelessly confused.
You mean since I don't believe your Jesuit lie that we must all
disagree and not become damned despots like you Jesuits and Opus
Deiites?
>I cannot imagine why you wish to deny
>your own mortality. Is this some religious belief of yours?
Like I can't imagine why you don't want to reveal your thesis to the
world under Homeland Security and was missing at the ceremonies of
ground zero at each anniversay, O damned one?
Can someone tell the damned Vatican killer that I never said I don't
die?
>Christians, on the other hand, believe that death is the gateway to the
>afterlife. It is a pity that you will not be sharing the afterlife with us.
>Or have you simply overlooked your biological limitations?
Show us the scripture that says that damned liars and killers will be
in heaven! Christ accused your father of being a liar and a murderer.
Is He dumb enough to be skilled in those enterprises Himself?
Tell the world and Homeland Security your proposition so that you can
at least reach another afterlife quickly!
>> You wouldn't mind one religious leader calling all the bigoted shots from
>above!
>
>Of course I would mind. I am not a religious fascist.
Lying words! What are they! He excuses death mandates against all
non-Catholics. Evidence is shown. Words come and compete! Which do
you choose!
>And I wouldn't
>tolerate it in others. Not even in you. I cannot imagine anyone telling me
>what to believe. I can do it for myself, thank you very much.
But I am confused because no one had the sense to stand at ground zero
yet and explain that all men must die! So confused that they
understand my proposition, but being Jesuits, know how to evade and
divert from it!
>So don't put your bigoted, ill informed neuroticisms into my mouth, madam!
Damned one: ARE YOU GOING TO NOW STAND UP AND ACKNOWLEDGE YOUR
ABSENTEE POTENTIAL REWARD BY TELLING THE WORLD YOU SHOULD HAVE BEEN AT
GROUND ZERO TELLING THEM THAT ALL MEN MUST DIE ONLY WHEN WE BRING UP
YOUR JESUIT BROTHERS AND SISTERS TELLING US ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST
DIE?
>What is your expression for this sin? Oh yes, quote "Don't speak for me,
>Jesuit!" unquote.
You will not remember to do what I have said so that the world will be
a better place. I speak for the evidence and therefore have to speak
for the fibb-murder clan.
>> While acting like a JESUIT, JESUIT?? Multitudes dying is no problem.
>> You have a concern, Jesuit?
>
>Of course I am concerned about multitudes dying. Why do you say "Multitudes
>dying is no problem"? Do you have no concern for the suffering of God's
>children?
Liar, Jesuit, Opus Dieite KILLER! What is the response that we NEVER
yet heard over the TV to the 911 disaster that we now have heard
several times over the newsgroups from the killers of the Antichrist?
How come the TV couldn't tell us in response to 911 yet that all men
must die in response?
>> >I think the term you wish is "Jesuitical".
>> Don't speak for me, JESUIT!
>
>See what I mean? But if you used the right, unambiguous term in the first
>place you would save us all a lot of hassle.
GO TO GROUND ZERO WITH YOUR NAZI BELIEFS PLEASE! MAKE THE WORLD A
BETTER PLACE!!
>> Terrorists attack Iraqi oil installations. The price of oil goes up.
>> BUSH GETS STRONGER!! EVERYTHING THEY DO MAKES HIM STRONGER!!
>
>Yes, it worries me that Bush does seem to be benefiting from this. But then
>I have always been against the Iraq war on moral and political grounds - and
>I have denounced it vociferously and frequently. Now you, Susan, have the
>opportunity to remove Bush from office.
But all men must die in response to 911? or to your Jesuit friends
posting worse how ALL NON-CATHOLICS must die! Does Osama believe that
in response to 911?
You, Jesuit, have the opportunity to expound upon your beliefs and
enter the afterlife just by going to ground zero and making known your
Jesuit psychiatry before the world!
>For a while I thought you were serious in your complaints, now I see from
>the way you have attacked me without justification that you are simply a
>troll.
GO TO GROUND ZERO,
DAMNED,
DAMNED,
JESUIT!
I can help you get a hearing aid first!
Don
> Like I can't imagine why you don't want to reveal your thesis to the
> world under Homeland Security and was missing at the ceremonies of
> ground zero at each anniversay, O damned one?
What thesis do you imagine this is? I have no doubt that OBL's group
perpetrated the atrocity. I don't believe there is any respectable evidence
to the contrary. If you have any then it is you who should disabuse Homeland
Security of their beliefs, because, they certainly don't appear to disagree
with my view.
But then you have your own conspiracy theory to propound. And where is the
evidence for that? Next you'll be telling us it was the fairies at the
bottom of the garden that did it.
> He excuses death mandates against all non-Catholics. Evidence is shown.
Words come and compete! Which do you choose!
What a load of twaddle you talk. I certainly don't subscribe to your belief
that Catholics have passed a death mandate against all non-Catholics. What
you manifest is anti-Catholic paranoia.
> I speak for the evidence and therefore have to speak for the fibb-murder
clan.
Which "fibb-murder" clan are you mouthpiece for?
> Liar, Jesuit, Opus Dieite KILLER! What is the response that we NEVER
> yet heard over the TV to the 911 disaster that we now have heard
> several times over the newsgroups from the killers of the Antichrist?
> How come the TV couldn't tell us in response to 911 yet that all men
> must die in response?
Whoah, paranoia!
I will pray for your cure.
regards
Don
Susan Williams
>"Susan Williams" <SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:9fltl01mtntpghjv3...@4ax.com...
>
>> Like I can't imagine why you don't want to reveal your thesis to the
>> world under Homeland Security and was missing at the ceremonies of
>> ground zero at each anniversay, O damned one?
>
>What thesis do you imagine this is? I have no doubt that OBL's group
>perpetrated the atrocity. I don't believe there is any respectable evidence
>to the contrary. If you have any then it is you who should disabuse Homeland
>Security of their beliefs, because, they certainly don't appear to disagree
>with my view.
I am still not damned like you super-terrorist, super-criminals of the
Pope!
I STILL DON'T BELIEVE ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE AS YOU USTASHI
SUPER-CRIMINALS DO
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/Grizogono.htm
, AND THAT IF PEOPLE WRITE THAT THEY MUST I MUST UNDERSTAND THAT ALL
MEN DIE AS GREAT NEWS TO RELATE TO HOMELAND SECURITY.
I AM NOT A DAMNED SERVANT OF THE ANTICHRIST WHO HAS SUCH PSYCHIATRY
THEY DON'T KNOW WHAT HEARING AIDS ARE!
>But then you have your own conspiracy theory to propound.
How does it measure to the idea you gave that in answer to the 911
attacks we must inform ground zero that they must understand that all
men die? You used that to defend the man who told us all
non-Catholics must die.
That was your Jesuit conspiracy theory.
>And where is the
>evidence for that?
That we should tell ground zero that in answer to 911, we understand
that all men die as you have used to defend Ted Seeber telling us all
non-Catholics should die?
>Next you'll be telling us it was the fairies at the
>bottom of the garden that did it.
Where do you damned super-terrorists know everything except that I
still refuse to believe all non-Catholics must die as you believe?
>> He excuses death mandates against all non-Catholics. Evidence is shown.
>Words come and compete! Which do you choose!
>
>What a load of twaddle you talk.
Is that why a super-terrorist like you who believes all non-Catholics
should die, stick around? Question was asked hundreds of times!
>I certainly don't subscribe to your belief
>that Catholics have passed a death mandate against all non-Catholics. What
>you manifest is anti-Catholic paranoia.
THEN WHY DID THIS SATANIC KILLER STAY HERE?? He waited a long time to
make this lie, reply first to Ted Seeber posting that all
non-Catholics should die by saying that all men must die, as if he was
teaching me something new about what eventually would always happen!
>> I speak for the evidence and therefore have to speak for the fibb-murder
>clan.
>
>Which "fibb-murder" clan are you mouthpiece for?
This killer is a footsoldier of the Pope with the same mind as the
Inquisitors!
>> Liar, Jesuit, Opus Dieite KILLER! What is the response that we NEVER
>> yet heard over the TV to the 911 disaster that we now have heard
>> several times over the newsgroups from the killers of the Antichrist?
>> How come the TV couldn't tell us in response to 911 yet that all men
>> must die in response?
>
>Whoah, paranoia!
GET YOUR KILLER OPUS DEI CARCASS HOME AND IGNORE MY POSTS THEN,
JESUIT!
>I will pray for your cure.
>
>regards
>Don
I am still not damned like you super-terrorist, super-criminals of the
Pope!
I STILL DON'T BELIEVE ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE AS YOU USTASHI
SUPER-CRIMINALS DO
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/Grizogono.htm
, AND THAT IF PEOPLE WRITE THAT THEY MUST I MUST UNDERSTAND THAT ALL
MEN DIE AS GREAT NEWS TO RELATE TO HOMELAND SECURITY.
I AM NOT A DAMNED SERVANT OF THE ANTICHRIST WHO HAS SUCH PSYCHIATRY
THEY DON'T KNOW WHAT HEARING AIDS ARE!
Susan Williams
>What a load of twaddle you talk. I certainly don't subscribe to your belief
>that Catholics have passed a death mandate against all non-Catholics. What
>you manifest is anti-Catholic paranoia.
Finally, after the Jesuit pretended he didn't understand what I was
saying nor even inquired after I was saying all along for a long time
that people posted that all non-Catholics should be exterminated, the
Ustashis finally agreed to go to greater depths of lying to say he
doesn't believe that others posted that all non-Catholics should die.
For the readers, here again is the evidence...
Here's the bold death mandate against all non-Catholics this abandoned
despot ignores constantly to this day...
============
These Jesuits created a post entitled, "In Defense of the Church
Wiping Out Heretics!" You can find that thread here:
In response to this, since they violate all their lying tirades
against making attacks and accusations to attack us as hateful, we
responded with another thread entitled, "IN DEFENSE OF THE CHURCH
WIPING OUR HER NEIGHBOURS"
You can find that thread here:
The thread was expounding upon the Parable of the Good Samaritan where
Christ shows how those not of our religion should be treated contrary
to the mandates of Rome!
A man by the name of Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholic life when
with approval he told us that:
"NONE of the groups persecuted by the Catholics were living the Bible.
They were living their personal interpretations of God, not the Bible"
You can find that statement here as I submit the evidence:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&group=alt.religion.christian.adventist&scoring=r&as_drrb=b&as_mind=5&as_minm=10&as_miny=2001&as_maxd=7&as_maxm=10&as_maxy=2001&selm=55de15cf.0110071743.205a5dea%40posting.google.com
Brother Ted revealed that this was done just after the 911 attacks
when America was assessing what a terrorist was with respect to human
life. Prime Minister Tony Blair, a short time after the 911 attacks
gave the world a definition of terrorists by telling us they are
people who have a marked disrespect for human life. Since Seeber
told us with approval that Rome persecuted non-Catholics because they
did not live the bible, how many of the victims of 911 live the bible?
Did Seeber give condolences to the victims of 911 after the attacks?
If so, why? Did he mean it?
Because of the revelation, Ted Seeber had to make an excuse and leave.
He left his website up, but his pictures and other things appeared to
have disappeared from it.
Soon, another killer super-terrorist became insensed at what was done
to Ted Seeber. He then moved out to attack me as I was showing how
Seeber confirmed THAT ROME HADN'T CHANGED. She still has
mass-exterminations as part of her agenda, practice and habits. To
accomplish this she has demons in human form trained to storm all free
media and teach people how they must understand that people will
disagree.
That killer refashioned his name after mine in the reverse and called
himself "William Suzanne." The man then entered with the boldest of
lies, much like John Ashcroft telling us the Patriot Act is
Constitutional!
He comes in telling us that SEEBER DOESN'T SPEAK FOR (or represent)
Rome in his condemnation of all non-Catholics.
I had to ask the super-terrorist more than once why then he wasn't
upset with Seeber for MISREPRESENTING Rome. Jesuits are all over the
newsgroups ranting and raging claim that we MISrepresent Rome. Will
Suzanne now tells us Seeber doesn’t represent Rome! He was asked to
give an answer for why he is not upset with Seeber. As usual, the
super-terrorist then moved into an unbridled attack against the
Adventist Church LEAVING THE QUESTION COMPLETELY UNTOUCHED!!
Now some of you may well not be convinced that Ted Seeber condemned
all non-Catholics on the newsgroups. Actually, to this day, even
those on the newsgroups who formerly denied it had to confess that
Seeber did just that, and they went into every manner of defense for
Seeber. As we expose the dialogues, we will more prove this.
However, since we started this work, another person came out more
boldly and gave approval of the deaths of millions of Christians. She
posts under the name of Teresita. When I made mention of that great
Christian work Foxe’s Book of Martyrs, detailing centuries of
uncountable murders of bible-believing Christians, she referred to the
work as:
"Foxe's Book of Hereticks." She therefore approved of their deaths
because they viewed religion differently:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=b0165u09im%40drn.newsguy.com
1/14/2003
Naturally, we got on her case for her boldness here as we still have
the liberty to do in this free country.
Teresita in response lied to us, telling us that when she called
Foxe's Book of Martyrs "Foxe's Book of Heretics," she was only
referring to the Albigenses of the Protestant Reformation 5/29/2003
who were a minority group of Christians during that time:
<http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bb521t01pej%40drn.newsguy.com&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dg:thl3424526807d%26dq%3D%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26selm%3Dbb521t01pej%2540drn.newsguy.com>
How do we know she was lying? The Albigenses were hardly mentioned in
that massive work. Protestants usually have little to say about the
Albigenses BECAUSE BOTH THEMSELVES AND ALL THEIR WORKS WERE COMPLETELY
ANNIHILATED BY ROME! But more proof that she was lying comes in her
next response as she worked to divert from my advancing questions:
Teresita belied her claim that she was only refering to the Albigenses
when she condemned the Christian martyrs as “hereticks” by condemning
Tyndale, who was not one of the Albigenses:
<http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bcfbru0230p%40drn.newsguy.com>
NEXT:
When pressed further and further to reveal her beliefs she is trained
to hide on the matter of the value of human life, Teresita says the
Vatican merely carried out God's commands when they killed millions of
Christians because the Israelites did the same with their enemies.
Here she is freely admitting what all those “Anti-Catholics” and
“Catholic-haters” have been saying all along:
Here is that dialogue below:
From: Teresita (tere...@newsguy.com)
Subject: Re: Teresita responds inappropriatly
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist,
alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, tnn.religion.catholic
Date: 2003-05-29 12:05:31 PST
In article <6s6bdv0l317i6dfjs...@4ax.com>, Susan says...
>
>Like Ted Seeber, you gave approval to their deaths and then come on the forums telling me I hate people just because they disagree.
>
>We are still under Homeland Security right through to the destruction of this nation. We are asked to report all terrorist activity found
>in people who have a profound disrespect of human life!
Teresita replies:
We merely carried out God's commandment in His Eternal Word:
Deuteronomy 17:2-5 "If there is found among you, within any of your
towns which the Lord your God gives you, a man or woman who does what
is evil in the sight of the Lord your God, in transgressing his
covenant, and has gone and served other gods and worshiped them, or
the sun or the moon or any of the host of heaven, which I have
forbidden, and it is told you and you hear of it; then you shall
inquire diligently, and if it is true and certain that such an
abominable thing has been done in Israel, then you shall bring forth
to your gates that man or woman who has done this evil thing, and you
shall stone that man or woman to death with stones."
From: Teresita (tere...@newsguy.com)
Subject: Re: #TWO "CULT" COMPARED better version
View: Complete Thread (21 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist,
alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, tnn.religion.catholic
Date: 2003-09-21 11:52:08 PST
In article <3dqrmvoit629haa6l...@4ax.com>, Susan
Williams says...
>
>I saw an official Catholic website on the Inquisition that said the same
>thing Teresita said: That Rome can put non-Catholics to death based
>upon the word of God.
Leviticus 24:16 Anyone who blasphemes the name of the LORD must be put
to death.
The entire assembly must stone him. Whether an alien or native-born,
when he
blasphemes the Name, he must be put to death.
--
Encyclopedia Teresita
http://web.newsguy.com/teresita
ARE YOU LISTENING HOMELAND SECURITY??? She claims the scriptures
mandated their actions IN THE NEW TESTAMENT!! Is it the New Testament
now? Do those scriptures still exist now and have weight now IN THE
NEW TESTAMENT??
LASTLY AND MOST STRONGLY:
After telling us that just to expose these facts about Rome she is now
boldly admitting is hatred, what would happen if we took a look at
what ANTI-PROTESTANTISM always was throughout the ages? When we
brought this issue about hatred up for her condemning the lives of all
non-Catholics, this is how she declared Rome didn’t hate her victims
she was killing:
I wrote:
In article <3dqrmvoit629haa6l...@4ax.com>, Susan
Williams says...
>But super-terrorists--I mean SUPER-TERRORISTS, we are waiting for
>evidence. We were not born to listen to the worst killers on the
>earth who tell us what we must do, but when we expose how they are
>they tell the world we hate Catholics. They can kill all
>non-Catholics they say, BUT THEY DON'T HATE THEM!
Teresita replies:
It's nothing personal. It's just business.
--
Encyclopedia Teresita
Now the man who was ready to pull out his hair telling us that Ted
Seeber didn’t represent Rome when he condemned the lives of all
non-Catholics is nowhere to be found with Teresita boldly confirming
the same. He was asked to comment about the words of Teresita, but
how can you force centuries experienced killers to commit suicide??
Instead he attacks the Adventist Church as a dangerous cult:
Super-terrorist William Suzanne:
>They very much want to be perceived as Evangelical Christians, seeking
>a place on the ministerial fellowships. All this is good PR for them,
>but what do they really believe?
Susan Williams:
True Adventist are not like that. The problem is that demon-possessed
killers from the Antichrist such as William Suzanne have infiltrated
our church to the CORE. That is why when Ted Seeber condemned all
non-Catholics to persecution and death, Paul Tooley came in to lie
claimng that he didn't do that, and then attacked me for exposing him.
They are trying to tell us that it is standard behavior for Adventists
to attack people who expose death mandates against all non-Catholics,
and that I am therefore not one.
Antichrist Andrew then attacked, claiming that by Brother Ted
frequently posting, he has childhood trauma and a dysfunctional home.
All of these said not the slightest word against the man who condemned
them to death.
COMPARE THE ISSUES THE SUPER-TERRORIST IS BRINGING AGAINST THE
ADVENTIST CHURCH WITH WHAT I'M SHIOWING YOU AND SEE WHAT YOU WOULD
PREFER IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD!
William Suzanne:
>What facts won't they tell you?
Susan Williams:
Will Adventists tell you that you must protect a man who has condemned
the lives of all non-Catholics? Will they then tell you that a person
who exposes such a person is hateful and Satan’s child as William
Suzanne, Lamarr Edwards, "Adventist" Paul Tooley and "Adventist"
Andrew have done?
COMPARE THE ISSUES THE SUPER-TERRORIST IS BRINGING AGAINST THE
ADVENTIST CHURCH WITH WHAT I'M SHIOWING YOU AND SEE WHAT YOU WOULD
PREFER IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD!
William Suzanne:
>They won't tell you that they consider themselves to be the only,
>true, remnant Church. Their prophetess, Ellen G. White, whom they
>revere and believe without question has told them that
Susan Williams:
I would tell anyone that. But do you know folks that the major reason
Rome has shed more blood than any institution on earth was because all
those centuries of the Christian era SHE HAS BEEN SAYING THAT SHE WAS
THE ONLY TRUE CHURCH?? Do you know that she recently published a
public document REAFFIRMING THIS?? Why then is Will upset at us for
what he claims is the major crime of claiming to be the true church?
Now the man is telling us the Adventist Church is trying to hide the
claim. Rome doesn't hide the claim. Would something smell bad if the
Evangelical community accepts Rome anyway even though her claims to be
the true church always involves the shedding of much blood to those
who disagree?
Watch the demon work:
William Suzanne:
>"...Satan has taken full possession of the Churches". (Spiritual Gifts
>V.l,p.189-90) They also believe our prayers are an "abomination" to
>God. (Spiritual Gifts, V1 p.190).
>That is what they think of you and your church, even if they won't say
>it out loud in public, or to your face.
>
Susan Williams:
Now listen to what the Protestants used to say BEFORE, so that we can
figure out if something has taken possession of them:
"But even with such a great cloud of witnesses, one might be tempted
to ask the following question, 'Has not Rome changed recently?' To
answer this most vital question, I turn once again to the message of
D. Martyn Lloyd Jones:
'Ah, but,' you say, 'has not the Roman Catholic Church changed? You
are simply looking back, you are speaking as if you lived in the 16th
century - don't you realize you are living in the 20th century?
My answer is quite simple. The proudest boast of the Roman Catholic
Church is this, that she never changes, Semper eadem. How can she
change? If she changes she will be admitting that she was wrong in the
past - but she was saying then that she was infallible, and that the
Pope is the Vicar of Christ and that he cannot make a mistake. If she
says that she is capable of change she is denying her central claim!
She does not say that she is changing, and she never will. The Church
of Rome remains the same.
If anything, she is even worse. She has 'added' things to what she
taught in the 16th century, such as Papal infallibility, etc. No,
there is no change in the Church of Rome. And if there ever is one
great world Church, it will be because the Church of Rome has absorbed
all the rest and swallowed them in ignorance!'
=============
William Suzanne:
>They revere their founding prophetess, Ellen G. White, and made this
>statement in their "Ministry" Magazine of Oct. 1981 and have never
>retracted it:
Susan Williams:
What the super-terrorists won't tell you AND WHAT THEY HAVE NOT
RETRACTED! COMPARE THE "CRIMES!":
"If Catholics ever gain a sufficient numerical majority in this
country, religious freedom is at an end. So our enemies say, SO WE
BELIEVE" (The Shepherd of the Valley, official journal of the Bishop
of St Louis, Nov. 23, 1851).
William Suzanne claiming to quote Adventist sources:
>"We believe the revelation and inspiration of both the Bible and Ellen
>White's writings to be of equal quality. The superintendence of the
>Holy Spirit was just as careful and thorough in one case as in the
>other".
Susan Williams:
"No man has a right to choose his religion." -- (New York Freeman,
official journal of Bishops Hughes, Jan. 26, 1852).
William Suzanne:
>They won't tell you too much about Ellen G. White at their public
>seminars, but their goal is to bring the person attending to the point
>of conversion and baptism.
>
>Their 2000 baptismal certificate poses questions to which the
>candidate must answer "yes". Question 8 says,
>
>"Do you accept the biblical teaching of spiritual gifts and believe
>that the gift of prophecy is one of the identifying marks of the
>remnant church".
>
>If the candidate says "yes" and is baptized, they soon learn that the
>"gift of prophecy" is Ellen G. White's writings. Point 13 has them
>accepting that the SDA Church is the remnant church of Bible Prophecy.
>They have been baptized into an exclusive group, but they don't know
>how exclusive it is, yet!
Susan Williams:
"The church . . . does not, and cannot accept, or in any degree favor,
liberty in the Protestant sense of liberty." -- (Catholic World,
April, 1870.)
"Protestantism has not, and never can have, any right where
Catholicity has triumphed." -- (Catholic Review, June, 1875)
William Suzanne:
>No doubt they will be urged to avail themselves of a "Clear Word
>Bible". This publication of theirs has inserted the words and
>doctrines of Ellen G. White right into the Bible text, insuring that
>the person studying it will have the mind of Ellen G. White.
>
>Slowly, but surely, the new SDA will come to believe these
>extra-biblical doctrines that set the SDA church apart from
>Evangelical Christianity.
Susan Williams:
"Religious Liberty is merely endured UNTIL THE OPPOSITE CAN BE CARRIED
INTO EFFECT WITHOUT PERIL TO THE CATHOLIC CHURCH." -- (Rt. Rev.
O'Connor, Bishop of Pittsburgh.)
"The absurd and erroneous doctrines or ravings in defense of liberty
of conscience are a most pestilential error--a pest, of all others,
most to be dreaded in a state." -- Encyclical Letter of Pope Pius IX,
August 15, 1854.
"There is, ere long, to be a state religion in this country, and that
state religion is to be the Roman Catholic. . . The Roman Catholic is
to wield his vote for the purpose of securing Catholic ascendancy in
this country." -- (Father Hecker, Catholic World, July, 1870.)
"If the liberties of the American people are ever destroyed, they will
fall by the hands of the Catholic clergy." -- Lafayette
"You ask if the Pope were lord over this land and you were in a
minority, what he would do to you? That, we say, would entirely depend
on circumstances. If it would benefit the cause of Catholicism, he
would tolerate you: if expedient, he would imprison, banish you,
probably he might even hang you. But be assured of one thing, he would
never tolerate you for the sake of your glorious principles of Civil
and religious liberty." -- (Rambler, one of the most prominent
Catholic papers of England, Sept., 1851.)
WHICH WOULD YOU WANT IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD!
How about William Suzanne telling us that ELLEN WHITE, dead for almost
100 years, IS THE ANTICHRIST!! When Christ comes, He will smell like
a rose just ressurrecting Ellen White to punish her for destroying the
earth!!
In His Grace,
Susan Williams
Kenna
Jesuits. Now I'm an Aussie but I'm guessing that Bush ain't even a
Catholic so why would he be in bed with a jesuit plot to "kill all
non-catholics". Would'nt he be killing himself.
Still confused as to how Jesuits which were not really the order
involved in the inquisition anyway, that have taken a vow of poverty
caused planes to fly into buildings in the US.
Anyway argueing the point with you is just reinforcing you're
delusions. Once again up the dosage.
Signed.
Father Superior
Jesuit Order
DOOOHHHH
I mean Kenna. ;-)
Susan Williams
>Don't really quite still get it Susan. What has Bush got to do with
>Jesuits. Now I'm an Aussie but I'm guessing that Bush ain't even a
>Catholic so why would he be in bed with a jesuit plot to "kill all
>non-catholics". Would'nt he be killing himself.
Don't you get it Jesuit?
You now know that people posted that all non-Catholics must die.
Doesn't bother you.
Why do you believe the same?
>Still confused as to how Jesuits which were not really the order
>involved in the inquisition anyway, that have taken a vow of poverty
>caused planes to fly into buildings in the US.
All happened under Bush's watchcare. He then takes advantage to claim
dictatorial powers as a reward for his inadequacies. He spits out The
Patriot Act containing key ingredients from the Inquisitions.
During his inaugural address, he spoke words quoted from Josemaria
Escriva, the founder of Opus Dei and calls him a SAINT.
>Anyway argueing the point with you is just reinforcing you're
>delusions. Once again up the dosage.
>
>Signed.
>
>Father Superior
>Jesuit Order
>
>DOOOHHHH
>
>I mean Kenna. ;-)
Can I convince you damn Jesuits to now go home and remember to take
those anti-paranoia pills so that you can have the power to ignore
posts you call insane?
Make sure the pills are tweaked so that you will understand people
have posted that all non-Catholics should be exterminated.
By the way...
It would be a good idea of you first disagree with the motion before
you take that pill!
In His Grace,
Susan
Don
> ... (snipped) ...
(A load of anti-catholic bigotted nonsense)
Susan, have you nothing better to do, no other project or purpose in life,
than to spend your hours sulking about a thread you started in November
2003 - that's eleven months ago, for goodness sake!
It is quite clear that you don't understand the thread started by Joseph
Geloso on 4th November 2003. That thread was very controversial and, to
paraphrase, is asking how far the Church should go in the self-defence of
its adherents. You should have noticed that the original was a question not
an assertion. The concensus rightly did not agree with Geloso. Geloso's
question encapsulates a view which is utterly unacceptable by any right
thinking person. However, as is common with newsgroup threads, a number of
persons, usually from the standpoint of ignorance over-reacted to the
initial line of argument. Some promulgated the lie that the Catholic church
supports the wiping out of non-Catholics. Most of those who did this were
clearly opposed to Catholicism. They clearly have an agenda which is to
paint the Church in the blackest colours they can invent. The reality is
that it is not the policy of the Catholic church to wipe out non-believers.
Nor would anyone of sound mind seriously suggest that the Catholic church
was behind 911. You have responded to both lies by adopting them and sulking
about them for eleven months. Is that not insane?
It quite beggars belief that you, having taken these comments literally (do
you believe everything you read in Newsgroups?), should not have been
satisfied with venting your frustrations in your own little thread. You have
had your opportunity to mouth off at Geloso even though you started your
thread with bigotry calling it "In defense of wiping our our neighbours" and
opening with the factually incorrect sentence "Below is one of the posts
written by super-terrorists who tell us it
is legitimate to wipe out all non-Catholics." The reality is that those who
started the original thread did not tell you that. You inferred it
incorrectly by not looking at the purpose of the original thread.
Not content with this, you have mouthed off and defamed every one who has
contributed to the present discussion.
In doing so you have displayed an astonishingly high level of ignorance,
intolerance and emotional and religious insecurity.
You have also mouthed off against Opus Dei and the Jesuits (of which, once
again I stress, I am not one) both instituions in relation to which the
criticisms you raise are misdirected. There are other criticisms which might
have been directed towards them, but involvement in 911 is not one.
Is it not time to bow out gracefully?
regards
Don
Susan Williams
>
>"Susan Williams" <SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:c3e5m0p396jabge8e...@4ax.com...
>> ... (snipped) ...
>
>(A load of anti-catholic bigotted nonsense)
THIS SUPER-DAMNED SUPER-CRIMINAL HEARD AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT OTHER
SUPER-CRIMINALS POSTED THAT ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE!
What else is the super-terrorist organization going to conclude??
>Susan, have you nothing better to do, no other project or purpose in life,
>than to spend your hours sulking about a thread you started in November
>2003 - that's eleven months ago, for goodness sake!
THIS DAMNED SUPER-CRIMINAL ACKNOWLEDGED THAT HIS SUPER-TERRORIST
FRIENDS POSTED THAT ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE!!
He gave no comment about those terrorists having the same mandates as
centuries ago!!
>It is quite clear that you don't understand the thread started by Joseph
>Geloso on 4th November 2003. That thread was very controversial and, to
>paraphrase, is asking how far the Church should go in the self-defence of
>its adherents.
THIS DAMNED SUPER-CRIMINAL SHOULD HAVE UNDERSTOOD THE TRUE MEANING OF
ALL THE THREADS WRITTEN BY JACK CHICK UNTIL OTHERS UNCONTROLLABLY HAD
TO CONFIRM HIS WRITINGS AND "SLIP" POST HOW ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST
DIE!
Geloso said that the church has the right to wipe out heretics and
then said, "SO WHAT!" We have the right just to report about that,
and these demons pull out their hairs and call us "hate personified!"
>You should have noticed that the original was a question not
>an assertion. The concensus rightly did not agree with Geloso. Geloso's
>question encapsulates a view which is utterly unacceptable by any right
>thinking person. However, as is common with newsgroup threads, a number of
>persons, usually from the standpoint of ignorance over-reacted to the
>initial line of argument. Some promulgated the lie that the Catholic church
>supports the wiping out of non-Catholics.
THIS UTTERLY DAMNED SUPER-CRIMINAL AND SUPER-TERRORIST ACNOWLEDGED
THAT SEEBER FOLLOWED IN THE LINE OF THOUGHT AND POSTED THAT ALL
NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE. TERESITA FOLLOWED AND THEN STATED, "IT'S
NOTHING PERSONAL. IT'S JUST BUSINESS" TO EXTERMINATE THEM.
SHAN CAME IN HOFFING IN ANGER AT US EXPOSING SEEBER TO CLAIM SEEBER
DOESN'T REPRESENT ROME. SHAN THENCE SAID THAT ALL ADVENTISTS,
JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES, "MORONS" (MORMONS) AND OTHERS "MUST DIE!"
HE THEN WROTE BREATHELESSLY HOW ALL SUCH SHOULD BE "BURNED" BECAUSE
THEY ARE DAMNED ANYWAY!
>Most of those who did this were
>clearly opposed to Catholicism. They clearly have an agenda which is to
>paint the Church in the blackest colours they can invent. The reality is
>that it is not the policy of the Catholic church to wipe out non-believers.
SHOWN BY THIS SUPER-CRIMIINAL FOLLOWING THAT LONG LINE OF OTHER
SUPER-CRIMINALS TO ONLY ATTACK THOSE REPORTING ABOUT THE STEADY AND
VOLUNTARY CONFIRMATION OF THE WRITINGS OF JACK CHICK!
A SUPER-TERRORIST IS A SUPER-TERRORIST. THE ONES WHO DID THIS REMAIN
UNCHALLENGED AND UNREMARKED. THE ONES WHO REPORTED ABOUT IT ARE
ATTACKED. THIS SUPER-CRIMINAL SHOULD THENCE FURTHER HAVE NO POWER TO
RESIST THE WORDS OF JACK CHICK, AND MUST BE A PSYCHIATRIST ALSO!
>Nor would anyone of sound mind seriously suggest that the Catholic church
>was behind 911. You have responded to both lies by adopting them and sulking
>about them for eleven months. Is that not insane?
IMAGINE ME BEING UPSET ABOUT PEOPLE BOLDLY POSTING THAT ALL
NON-CATHOLIC MUST DIE, INSTEAD OF AGREEING WITH THE MOTION AS THIS
DAMNED SUPER-DECEIVER!
BUT THEY ALL OPPOSED ABORTION!! SURELY THIS WILL NOT CATCH THE EYE OF
THE SUPER-CRIMINAL PSYCHIATRIST!
>It quite beggars belief that you, having taken these comments literally (do
>you believe everything you read in Newsgroups?),
Why is this super-criminal believing what I write since he is
irritated at the reporting of the actions of the super-criminals
instead of the other way around?
>should not have been
>satisfied with venting your frustrations in your own little thread.
This damned Jesuit should have been satisfied giving his psychiatric
diagnosis of me and thence giving him excuse to ignore insane posts!
>You have
>had your opportunity to mouth off at Geloso even though you started your
>thread with bigotry calling it "In defense of wiping our our neighbours"
That's the difference between Christians and Antichristians. Me
appealing to Christ's methods and treating with respect and kindness
those not of our faiths will be looked upon as bigotry by the sons and
daughters of perdition.
NOTICE THIS DAMNED INQUISITOR WENT BACK A LONG TIME AGO TO SULK ABOUT
MY PLEA TO RESPECT HUMAN LIFE?
>and
>opening with the factually incorrect sentence "Below is one of the posts
>written by super-terrorists who tell us it
>is legitimate to wipe out all non-Catholics." The reality is that those who
>started the original thread did not tell you that.
The reality is that they told us that. That's why other
super-criminal psychiatrists cannot remove themselves from what they
call insane posts!
>You inferred it
>incorrectly by not looking at the purpose of the original thread.
No wonder I'm upset about people posting how all non-Catholics must
die, and, as Jack Chick documents, super-criminals will always only be
upset with those who report about it.
>Not content with this, you have mouthed off and defamed every one who has
>contributed to the present discussion.
I HAVE COMPLIMENTED ALL THE SUPER-CRIMINALS HERE WHO WILL NATURALLY
OVERLOOK SOMEONE POSTING HOW ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE SINCE THEY
AGREE WITH THIS AS DON, BUT THEN BECOME UPSET AT THOSE REPORTING ABOUT
IT.
>In doing so you have displayed an astonishingly high level of ignorance,
>intolerance and emotional and religious insecurity.
I'M A CRIMINAL!! BETTER I HAD POSTED THAT ALL CATHOLICS MUST DIE!
THESE ARE THE INQUISITORS AND SUPER-TERRORISTS SUPER-CRIMINALS OF THE
AGES!
>You have also mouthed off against Opus Dei and the Jesuits (of which, once
>again I stress, I am not one)
DAMNED DAMNED DAMNED LIAR! Characteristics are all there!
>both instituions in relation to which the
>criticisms you raise are misdirected.
In this Jesuit's opinion. After those attacks the form of government
being established and changed is mimicking the Inquisitions as people
even tell us we must pre-emptively attack other nations and people and
use TORTURE to save the formerly Jesuit non-PARANOIC world.
>There are other criticisms which might
>have been directed towards them, but involvement in 911 is not one.
NEW WORLD ORDER! Bush family. Nazis and ties to them. Vatican:
globalist organization. Nazis globalists. Communists globalists.
Super-terrorist married to my posts. Constantly asked why every
super-criminal has to call my posts insane, but they can't afford to
struggle to smother and heckle them out. People who need hearing aids
and psychiatrists always know reality?
>Is it not time to bow out gracefully?
THAT'S WHAT I'M TRYING TO TELL THE DAMNED SUPER-CRIMINAL! Leave those
who are exposing the super-criminals for the sake of human life and
ignore my posts! He is giving common sense, is he not? Can he keep
it?
Here is the story that has the super-criminals of the Pope hanging
around our posts.
People posted that all non-Catholics must die. We were uspet about
it. Suddenly, as told us by Jack Chick, we have strange people from
different denominations attacking us ONLY and for years have refused
to say one bad word against those who did this.
Lest you forget the issue or evidence, here it is...
===========
Here's the bold death mandate against all non-Catholics this abandoned
despot ignores constantly to this day...
============
These Jesuits created a post entitled, "In Defense of the Church
Wiping Out Heretics!" You can find that thread here:
In response to this, since they violate all their lying tirades
against making attacks and accusations to attack us as hateful, we
responded with another thread entitled, "IN DEFENSE OF THE CHURCH
WIPING OUR HER NEIGHBOURS"
You can find that thread here:
The thread was expounding upon the Parable of the Good Samaritan where
Kenna
Williams...
Susan, where is the love?
Why do you hate them so much, and don't say because "they said that
all Non-Catholics must die"
Man this is fun!
Don
> ... ... ...
How far do you think Christians should go in the self-defence of the Faith?
Maybe you don't think it is worth defending?
> This damned Jesuit should have been satisfied giving his psychiatric
> diagnosis of me and thence giving him excuse to ignore insane posts!
So you accept that your posts are insane do you? When did you first realise
your posts were coming out all insane? Does it worry you? Does it make you
feel bad? Do you want to tell me about it?
When did you first realise that you spoke for God in damning people who did
not agree with you?
> That's the difference between Christians and Antichristians. Me
> appealing to Christ's methods and treating with respect and kindness
> those not of our faiths will be looked upon as bigotry by the sons and
> daughters of perdition.
Do you think your response to me has been respectful and kind? What do you
think would be the most respectful thing you can say to me?
> I'M A CRIMINAL!!
Well you said it. Would you like to tell me about it? Get it off your chest?
> NEW WORLD ORDER! Bush family. Nazis and ties to them. Vatican:
> globalist organization. Nazis globalists. Communists globalists.
I think maybe you've missed a verb or two out here. IS there a reason why
"Bush family" appears here among you imagined persecutors?
regards
Don
Susan Williams
>"THIS SUPER-DAMNED SUPER-CRIMINAL HEARD AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT OTHER
>SUPER-CRIMINALS POSTED THAT ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE!" - Susan
>Williams...
>
>Susan, where is the love?
It went to BILLIONS of people who were condemned by super-terrorists!
Where is the love in your Vatican?
>Why do you hate them so much, and don't say because "they said that
>all Non-Catholics must die"
>
>Man this is fun!
Why do you believe all non-Catholics must die?
Why do you hate BILLIONS of people because they are non-Catholic and
insist that love demands I make the billions victims to the fewer
super-terrorists like you?
What should we do with Osama?
When Bush flew planes to Afghanistan, did you conjure up that
question?
In His Grace,
Susan
Susan Williams
>"Susan Williams" <SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:mauam09m3kq2v74gg...@4ax.com...
>> ... ... ...
>
>How far do you think Christians should go in the self-defence of the Faith?
>Maybe you don't think it is worth defending?
>
>> This damned Jesuit should have been satisfied giving his psychiatric
>> diagnosis of me and thence giving him excuse to ignore insane posts!
>
>So you accept that your posts are insane do you?
To super-terrorists like yourself, YES! Me being upset about people
bringing ideas to life centuries ago that all non-Catholics must die
is indeed insane to other super-terrorists such as yourself!
>When did you first realise
>your posts were coming out all insane?
When I agreed they appeared insane to super-terrorists and enemies of
this country and liberty. Jack Chick documented this, you know.
>Does it worry you? Does it make you
>feel bad? Do you want to tell me about it?
I AM PROUD I AM INSANE TO SUPER-TERRORISTS! I will always get mad if
anyone says all non-Catholics must die. You will always be upset with
those who are upset at the motion, just like your many iimps from Opus
Dei.
>When did you first realise that you spoke for God in damning people who did
>not agree with you?
As soon as they did not agree that all non-Catholics should live!
Does God agree with you that all non-Catholics must die? He is not
going to damn you?? The bible says HE WILL!
>> That's the difference between Christians and Antichristians. Me
>> appealing to Christ's methods and treating with respect and kindness
>> those not of our faiths will be looked upon as bigotry by the sons and
>> daughters of perdition.
>
>Do you think your response to me has been respectful and kind?
Do you think people telling us all non-Catholics must die is kind?
Can you tell us what made your psychiatrist mind see what kindness was
but can miss acts NOT EVEN COPIED BY CRIMIINALS IN JAIL?
What are people put in jail for nowadays? Believing BILLIONS of
people must die?
Notice how the demon in human form still hangs around posts he claims
are insane!
>What do you
>think would be the most respectful thing you can say to me?
What the Protestants have always said to you blind monsters...
YOU ARE DAMNED! YOU WILL DRINK EVERY DROP OF THE BLOOD YOU SPILL
DOUBLE!
For confirmation, read the bible, in particular, THE REVELATION!
>> I'M A CRIMINAL!!
>
>Well you said it. Would you like to tell me about it? Get it off your chest?
Why did you take the statement out of context and confirrm what Jack
Chick said about you super-terrorist Jesuits! Sure I'm a criminal to
you!
I AM A CRIMINAL TO SUPER-CRIMINALS who believe all non-Catholics must
die!
>> NEW WORLD ORDER! Bush family. Nazis and ties to them. Vatican:
>> globalist organization. Nazis globalists. Communists globalists.
>
>I think maybe you've missed a verb or two out here. IS there a reason why
>"Bush family" appears here among you imagined persecutors?
>
>regards
>Don
Why do you imagine I'm a persecutor and full of hate that keeps you up
at nights because I will still be upset at your friends posting that
all non-Catholics must die?
Here again are the posts of people who support genocide being defended
by a band of subversive and pretentious infiltrators and
super-criminals looking over what they have done to find "hatred" in
us for warning innocent people!
WHAT DO THEY MEAN TO YOU? DO YOU CARE ABOUT THEM??
Dear friends:
Here we are again with an urgent appeal to you. Things have gotten so
out of hand, that we wonder why even try. Viewing that the issues at
hand involve much blood however, we have to ask again and try again.
It is not a pleasant task, but we have to do it. Feast your eyes on
the following very incredible posts. They represent a nightmare we
have been facing for years. Some of the most amazing people capable of
acts no criminal in jail can commit have been getting bolder and
bolder in their posts on the newsgroups. Their boldness corresponds to
the actions of those currently in leadership capacity in the United
States and all over the world specifically in government, media,
education and even religion. As events toward change move more and
more rapidly they become more and more bold. Take a look at these
taken from the Google Newsgroups Archives. We first meet a poster who
is very very upset about something. What is he upset about?...
From: Shan (shank...@yahoo.com)
Subject: Re: #DEVIL SUSAN ANGRY COULDN'T PROVE ROME DEMANDS DEATHS OF
ALL NON-CATHOLICS!
Date: 2003-10-22 05:57:44 PST
I want you Harlot Bitch Whore SUSAN and your
cohorts to die.
ALL ADVENTISTS, LATTER DAY MORONS AND JEHOVAH'S NUTNESSES ARE FROM
SATAN AND MUST DIE.
Shan
Google Home - Advertising Programs - Business Solutions - About Google
©2004 Google
[Look at what he is writing. You can see he is more than upset. What
could have caused him to be this upset? Surely, you must be saying,
he is just a little perturbed and doesn't mean what he is saying. Is
that true? Watch now as he makes sure that everyone understands
clearly what he is writing...]
From: Shan (shank...@yahoo.com)
Subject: Re: #DEVIL SUSAN ANGRY COULDN'T PROVE ROME DEMANDS DEATHS OF
ALL NON-CATHOLICS!
Date: 2003-10-20 14:59:55 PST
Hey Harlot Susan Whore, for your sake, just to please your evil
nature, I am going to write it down in uppercase:
I THE UNDERSIGNED CONDEMN ALL ADVENTISTS, LATTER DAY MORONS AND
JEHOVAH'S NUTNESS TO EXTERMINATION.
ALL OTHER PROTESTANTS ARE SPARED.
SHAN
Google Home - Advertising Programs - Business Solutions - About Google
©2004 Google
[Just to please my evil nature he says, he writes words like these
during our "new day" when terrorism has become a big issue. Now, isn't
it better to joke about a bomb in an airport? Only just to please my
nature? Notice how he says all other Protestants are spared? You
must have guessed by now that he is Catholic, or rather, a Jesuit.
That we define as a footsoldier of the Pope who even engages in
subversion, and has the same mind as the Inquisitors of the Dark Ages.
Actually we more specifically believe that he is a member of Opus Dei.
Here are some more. Look at this very strange post in answer to
another very caustic individual named "Alan"...]
From: Susan Williams (SWilliams0...@hotmail.com)
Subject: Re: I have a devil in my house
Date: 2004-02-09 12:53:39 PST
"Alan M" <nos...@nospam.nospam> wrote in message
news:<vtKVb.48994$Wa....@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
> "Lester T. Linpord" <Lester_t...@yahoo.co.in> wrote in message
> news:bb97ab58.04020...@posting.google.com...
> > But he is a sweet little baby devil and a nice pet.
> >
> > Do you think devils are good pets or will they eat you someday?
Alan:
> Is this little devil called Ted McMillan ?
I know for a fact that Ted is not little. Not only is he so hung he
can suck himself, but I can take it all the way down. Try that,
jesuit!
In His Grace,
Susan
[This post has my name on it, but I did not write this post. The same
one by the name of "Shan" most likely wrote it.
Several times people like him have been without conscience enough to
fabricate posts as if they were sent by me. In this case you can tell
it is not me who posted by the email address. He knows that most
would get caught on this. The email address shown there is
SWilliams0...@hotmail.com. Notice the three (3) "I"s before the
"@" sign? My actual email address has two (2) "I"s. Time and time
again they showcase how unscrupulous they are and taunt us into
thinking they have a real advantage. But we don't desire to be like
them. They think their behavior merits more rewards for them in
heaven. We know better! But by looking at their talents, and then
sitting down and thinking, you would be able to more and more
understand what the future is for the world.
Here he calls the name "Ted." He is referring to Ted McMillan, who is
a good friend of mine who has had to face them like me. Ted is
super-intelligent to the point where they constantly also call him
insane, sick, etc., but leech on to his posts for dear emergency. They
know his posts reveal the truth. Why else would they constantly trail
his posts, calling them insane, and leave the rest of the internet
neglected? I learned much of what I know through Ted McMillan.
It is always important for them to smother out what Brother Ted is
saying. He reveals who they are and what they are up to. That's when
he was posting on the newsgroups. He was usually the editor of my
posts. You see and notice the boldness of the posts above, and can't
imagine that to even be bold enough to post like that tells you they
seem to know something about the times and about THE GOVERNMENT!
Shan continues here below, in this case posting along with another one
attacking us named "Alan" for the same reasons and on the same
premise. What reasons are they?...]
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=c59f85ea.0401211522.34c85ac0%40posting.google.com
From: Susan Williams (SWilliams0...@hotmail.com)
Subject: Re: #HAIRY-LEGGED SUSAN ACTUALLY MAN NAMED TED McMILLAN!!
MAJOR expose!
Date: 2004-01-21 15:22:23 PST
"Alan M" <nos...@nospam.nospam> wrote in message
news:<HYOOb.18611$Wa.1...@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
> "Teresita" <tere...@newsguy.com> wrote in message
> news:buem8...@drn.newsguy.com...
> > It's true!
> >
Alan:
> Gasp. Ted must shortly be due to stump his way around the well worn track
> again.
But Ted's lovely hot stump is almost as good as yours. At least one of
the best Jesuits I've had. But we all know what you are really after.
<snip>
This post again was not written by me. Brother Ted revealed that they
are Jesuits, or rather foot-soldiers of the Pope though they profess
to come from different denominations or even claim to be Seventh-day
Adventists: that is, INFILTRATORS. They therefore have to do
anything possible to take people off the track that they really are
Jesuits. The most popular tactic is to make jokes against the facts.
Obviously the man posting above and then impersonating me is very
angry. What could have caused him to get to this state? Amazingly it
was because some friends of his made some other very bold posts.
Here is his explanation of what we did that raised his dander. He
here speaks to one claiming to be a Seventh-day Adventist named
"Andrew" who also hates us no bounds:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:thl2218492349d&dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=71bd538c.0404011554.1c309a11%40posting.google.com
From: Shan (shank...@yahoo.com)
Subject: Attack Catholicism & Suffer Consequences SDAs or Others
Date: 2004-04-01 15:54:41 PST
Andrew,
Search for "Sonny Maou" and you would know waht happened.
I am sick and tired of reading attacks on everything relating to my
faith, Catholicism.
I am not willing to tolerate it any longer for anybodies sake, include
yours.
The ex-Archbishop of Canterburry was blamed recently for his remarks
on Muslim leaders because he said they do not condemn terrorism.
You, Andrew and other good Christians, are doing the same like Muslim
leaders because you do not lift a finger to condemn those who are
constantly attacking my faith beginning with this Sonny Maou who maybe
a reincarnation of the harlot man/woman Susan, Cindy or whatever these
idiots call themselves.
[Watch as Shan now accuses us of doing just what he has done in
sending email that impersonates me...]
It is very easy to create a bogus e-mail and sign in as someone else
so Susan maybe Sonny or anybody.
This situation will not be tolerated no matter what.
Simply put, anybody who attacks my faith will receive response in ten
folds.
I am the first to criticize clergy but I will not permit anybody to
attack the faith and go unpunished.
Shan
Notice his ancient or "inquisitor" style of speaking? As you can see
here, he claims we attacked Rome. Is that true? Well what would it
look like to you if we witnessed posters on the internet TELLING US
THAT ALL NON-CATHOLICS SHOULD BE EXTERMINATED, and that it is "JUST
BUSINESS" TO EXTERMINATE THEM? Would you be upset about that? Well
some posters sent posts with those exact words and meaning. We, being
non-Catholics no less, were very upset about it. We exposed those
posters AND THE OTHERS WHO DEFENDED THEM. That is what Shan is angry
about.
They first made many posts against the principles of the American
Constitution and the document itself. They then also made posts
against basic liberty. In this, they presented themselves as mere
debaters claiming they had a right to their opinions while they were
doing that. They referred to the American position as "REBELLION" and
called true Americans "rebels." Some may realize that these words
sound very familiar historically.
The problem is that we understood they were killers. Anyone who
condemns the principles of liberty and the American Constitution are
KILLERS. The American people have come a long way into forgetting this
at their own future tragedy and expense. So then what happened? The
only natural consistent result whether by experience or in written
thought would be those same people ultimately being
understood to be killers, and that worse than any that can be found in
our jails!
A man by the name of Ted Seeber first posted his approval throughout
history of Rome persecuting and killing Protestants. He claimed with
approval that Rome "persecuted the Christians" because they "didn't
live the bible." He said they merely lived their interpretation of the
bible. A problem thence arose when we put his statement in its true
light, for he spoke in the present tense.
He had earlier given condolences to the victims of the 911 tragedy. We
merely asked him how many of them "lived the bible." We then pointed
out that he made such remarks just after Prime Minister Tony Blair
defined terrorists as people who have a terrible disrespect for human
life. He made these remarks around October of 2001 just after the 911
attacks were fresh on minds. We remarked how Osama
Bin Laden decreed death in America because America did something
against Arabs, Muslims or Arab and Muslim lands, and then showed Ted
Seeber approved of the extermination of ALL non-Catholics simply for
not being Catholic, making quite a difference indeed. Yet this is
what people like Jack Chick, a famous publisher who often exposes Rome
and her plans against all free nations, had been saying all
along. By being bold and even over-zealous, Ted Seeber, Teresita, AND
OTHERS, confirmed his words.
This is by far not the end of the issue. Ted Seeber and others had
been saying that historical America sinned against God by opposing, of
all people, KING GEORGE. They made sure that they used the word
REBELLION prominently against the history of this nation. They made
sure the word was prominent and understood as they dialogued. We even
remembered Ted Seeber posting somewhere how his "fathers"
once owned this land, referring to the "New World" the United States
now rests on, before they were up-ended by "rebels."
As we demonstrated the situation, Ted Seeber found himself having to
cease from posting. The very written agenda of Homeland Security
points arrows directly against Ted Seeber for his remarks. Seeber was
also condemning America while defending Rome. The evidence shows he
had been doing this for a very long time on the Catholic and
Catholic-related newsgroups at least!
Is that where it ends? NO! They also gave unlimited support to
President Bush, even to the point of claiming we should submit all our
personal information to him and do everything he says EVEN OUTSIDE OF
CONSTITUTIONAL BOUNDS. You heard right, and that's what we're going to
prove. You need to hear things about the issues now taking place all
around you so that you can know the truth about what's going on.
Things are not nearly what they are being presented in the news and
everywhere else. We promise you that you'll hear things in this work
you never heard before.
As serious as this is, Shan and others expectedly entered the
discussion in order to lie their heads off. They were angry in that we
cornered Ted Seeber under very serious implications in attacking the
US Constitution and all liberty on behalf of Rome. They therefore
advanced upon us to do some damage control in deceit. They began
relentless attacks against us. We had to seriously attempt to dialogue
on the Adventist, Catholic and other newsgroups, and often we
discussed reports detailing how Rome hates the US Constitution and has
been attacking it since its inception using INFILTRATORS to infest
every area of society, especially areas of control in legislation,
religion, education and influence. Our own experiences as Adventists
in our church where even Adventist leaders caused great turmoil
through demanding underhandedly that the church must change into some
unrecognizable shape and become ecumenical, proved to us that
something was wrong. Well before we entered the newsgroups we
understood that the claims of Jack Chick, among others, were more
than true! Quickly we met a bunch of people telling us everyone must
enter discussion and be able to disagree, but who then always start a
relentless attack against the founding principles of our church, and
then became concerned and attacked us even mechanically when we began
to show that a global conspiracy is taking place. We started to beat
their brains out in discussion, so, as a response they constantly
accused us of hating them just because they disagree, and they worded
their accusations always in a way that no one can disagree with them.
In response to our constant questions, they used every other device,
including name-calling, insults, evasions, diversions... and all of
that was constantly led and followed by preaching against
name-calling, insults, evasions and diversions constantly and
mechanically.
Though they claimed even to come from different Protestant
denominations, they told us that we must not say a single thing about
Rome, lest we cast aspersions against many wonderful people. In
between them saying this, they attacked the Adventist Church
constantly with a relentless thud like a machine gun as if they never
told us we must not attack religion lest it casts aspersions. Upon
reading historical documents, we found that they were behaving as the
Jesuits historically did: having no conscience and breaking every
known rule, especially the ones they pushed upon us and insisted we
must keep. They subscribed to the concept of the "End Justifies The
Means."
In defending Ted Seeber therefore, their major argument here was that
Ted Seeber, in his super-terroristic remarks, was insulted, and that
he, contrary to us, was "kind and courteous" before he was unjustly
attacked by Brother Ted McMillan, and lastly, that Ted Seeber's
remarks do not represent Rome. In between all this, every chance then
they got, they accused us of hatred. When that is done constantly,
then other strange people will enter with the most hateful and even
profane posts attacking us. Shan is just one example. From
thence, the ones who complained we were hateful and stressed how much
it upset them, will pretend they don't see the worst hate posts, and
will constantly ignore them. They then ignore us as we constantly ask
them why they don't see hateful posts. This has happened over and over
and over again to the point where we don't even listen to them. Even
the posts above written by Shan received no opposition nor correction
except from us. Therefore after people like Shan have constantly
accused us of hatred based upon our posts, Shan enters in gladly and
boldly for reasons we already knew and made the statements he made
above. What then would their reaction be when Shan adds the following
messages clear under their noses:]
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=71bd538c.0404200435.1d1b98e1%40posting.google.com
From: Shan (shank...@yahoo.com)
Subject: Burn Heretics: SDAs, JWs, Morons & Badtist Cult
Date: 2004-04-20 05:35:34 PST
To make it easy for the Last Judgment, every Christian must here and
now plan on grouping all the Seventh-day Arsinests, Jehovah's
Nutnesses, Morons of Latter Day Ain'ts, Badtists and other cults they
know in their neighborhoods and burn them.
They are going to burn anyway, so why don't we speed up the process.
"Have you burned a heretic today?" should be your motto.
From: Shan (shank...@yahoo.com)
Subject: Have you burned a heretic today?
Date: 2004-04-20 05:40:29 PST
All good Christians are encouraged to burn a heretic per day at the
least.
Burning worst heretics earn you most credit. The worst are:
Seventh-day Adventists
Jehovah's Witnesses
Pentecostals
Baptists
Mormons
Other Fund-a-MENTAL-lists
[As you can see here all Protestants are included as "heretics," but
he lists the "worst" above. Why are they considered the "worst?" At
present our best guess is that, with the exception of the Pentecostals
and Baptists, all the others claim to be the "True Church." This is
very significant since we already suffered from a band of strange
people on "Adventist" discussion forums claiming to be former
Adventists who were trained to attack Adventism. They attacked the
Adventist Church with deep emotion one reason because, said they, she
claimed to be the true church and therefore believes her FELLOW
Christian brothers and sisters are "inferior" of "damned." They usual
put the word "FELLOW" Christian brothers and sisters in caps as they
are in ultra-deceive mode. This is a lie, but they constantly
constructed their words this way and would not stop. We doused their
position by even reminding them of a then recent and public
declaration by the Vatican that she is the true church. What then can
be their reply to this? They ignored us completely and pretended we
didn't post the declaration. They were no longer emotional over what
they claimed were arrogant "holier than thous." In many other ways as
they were laying charges and fibbing freely in the air, when we
compared their stated grievances with the history of Rome fulfilling
them much more profoundly, they became calm and made us to know that
Rome was the exception!
What then would their reactions be to the posts above? We didn't have
to think about what their reactions would be. We have had experience
with them for years and compared their abilities with historical
Protestant documents and the claims of Jack Chick. They actually
believe they will receive rewards in heaven for being unscrupulous. We
automatically thought about one in particular named
"Teresita." When Shan entered in for the attack, and it was
understood that although Teresita had already joined many others
entering in to our discussions to tell us we are "hatred"-personified
for exposing such people and that our "hatred" really disturbs and
crawls up her soul, she would not even show concern about the worst
posts of Shan. Below she replies after we asked her why she would not
respond to or condemn the hatred of Shan:]
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=bne2iq01kmn%40drn.newsguy.com
I have not condemned a single specific line for hate of the Black
Numenorean Vengeance Pact either. Both have equal non-existence.
-- Encyclopedia Teresita
=========
["Hatred" crawls up her unscrupulous soul enough to move to action and
attack us. What happens when worse hatred moves in? Teresita was no
surprise for this has happened over and over and over again. This is
my reply to her:]
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=1rh3qvcnbnun5ch5mfd21sa8me5a92p936%404ax.com
More talent from the servant of the Antichrist. She joins a host of
others who tell us hate really crawls to their soul. We are therefore
condemned eternally. Now Shan comes and curses in the worst manner.
Hate now doesn't bother her, but to follow her training and keeping of
the Jesuit Oath, she can divert by telling us she
didn't condemn soil samples either!
To Teresita: WHY DID YOU LIE except for the fact that you are a
servant of the Antichrist TERESITA? Why are all Protestant
documentation of you super-criminals true and literature from Rome
about yourselves a lie?
=========
[We have had to ask them why they lied hundreds of times. Each time
they know better than to answer, so they just ignore us and throw more
lies breathlessly like sand over and over and over again. To then more
demonstrate how free they believe themselves to commit any crime, was
there any surprise to me when Teresita joined Shan in profanity and
soon after posted the following:]
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=+%22fuck%22+group:alt.religion.christian.adventist+author:Teresita&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=bnh9vh02e13%40drn.newsguy.com&rnum=2
The following topics will merit no furthter reply from me:
1. Jesuit Oath
2. Ustasha, Utaschis,
whatever the fuck.
-- Encyclopedia Teresita
[Shan is not the only one who attacks us viciously because we exposed
Ted Seeber. But now it is time to see Ted Seeber and what he has
posted.
Here is the crucial dialogue where Ted Seeber made a very supreme
blunder and condemned whole races of people to death. It is dated
October 5, 2001 JUST AFTER THE 911 TERROR ATTACKS:
This is what Ted Seeber said during a discussion as he was condemning
the American system of liberty with the Constitution and telling us
that persecution is biblical to Brother McMillan with great
satisfaction:
================
Can you really be said to be believing in the Bible if you don't live
it?
NONE of the groups persecuted by the Catholics were living the Bible.
They were living their personal interpretations of God, not the Bible.
================
BINGO!! Here he was justifying the crusades and Inquisitions of Rome.
We were talking about crusades and massacres Rome created and
supported!
NOTICE HOW HE IS SPEAKING IN APPROVAL OF WHAT WAS DONE! THIS IS JUST
THE BEGINNING OF THE CRIMES OF THE MAN TED SEEBER! This that he speaks
is the beginning of many things!
Here is the clincher that forced Ted Seeber to flee from posting on
the newsgroups. Brother McMillan responded by saying:
Ted McMillan:
"NO WONDER YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT ME BRINGING BACK YOUR RECORD OF
HORRIBLE ATROCITIES! They were not even living the bible! Why even
worry about them!"
[Now, you're ready for this?? This is what Brother McMillan then
said]...
"WERE THE 5 TO 6 THOUSANDS WHO WERE KILLED BY THE TERRORIST ATTACKS
LIVING THE BIBLE?"
===========================
[Actually there were 3,000 who were killed.
Friends, remember the date of the terrorist attacks: September 11,
2001. Now look at the date of Ted Seeber's remarks!! Prime Minister
Tony Blair had not long prior given a definition of a terrorist, and
Seeber walked right in and fulfilled it worse than Osama Bin Laden!
Osama claims that many must die because America did something against
his race and/or religion. Seeber condemned everyone BECAUSE THEY'RE
NOT CATHOLIC!! That's why we call him a super-terrorist!
Ted Seeber gave condolences to the victims of 911 while posting also.
Brother Ted asked him if he really meant it since it is assumed that
most of the victims of that fateful day were non-Catholics!]
As simple and as striking as these words are, allow me to show you
first that even these don't stand alone to prove anything. With this
statement the man has been condemning the American Constitution and
all liberty. He told us that "liberty is useless, and only causes
schism." Ironically, he gave COMPLETE confidence to our current
national leaders, even telling us we should willingly provide them
with absolutely all our private information and obey EVERYTHING
President Bush says whether or not it goes against the Constitution.
He said he had no problem doing that SINCE HE DIDN'T HAVE ANYTHING TO
HIDE. He said the Constitution and the principles of liberty are,
"incredibly stupid and outdated" in concert with the Bush
Administration telling us that the US Counter-terrorism system was
"outdated" before regressing the principles of the Constitution as a
response to 911. That was fundamentally the ONLY thing the Bush
Administration did which sparked other unconstitutional measures! At
the same time, Seeber expressed disdain and hatred for our national
forefathers. He referred to our system of liberty as the “Protestant
rebellion,” showing his mind is exactly the same as the Inquisitors
centuries ago!
Seeber said boldly that he works within America to destroy the
principles of liberty it now has and says he is within acceptable
confines to attack it from the inside. WE ARE NOT KIDDING as we will
show you! Does this sound familiar from the Jack Chick material?
Seeber claimed it was his purpose to make sure through
reinterpretation, the principles of the Constitution should actually
be enforced OPPOSITE to the way they are interpreted and enforced
today. WE ARE NOT KIDDING!! Where were others who witnessed all of
this? They were right there attacking not Ted Seeber, but Brother
McMillan for defending the Constitution and exposing and reproving the
super-terrorist! We are talking about Baptists, Lutherans, AND EVEN
ADVENTISTS! The man Seeber has shown complete indifference to
atrocities against bible-believers but went nuts when those atrocities
were exposed or when we exposed who he and his friends were! All of
them, claiming to come from various Christian denominations--and even
one claiming to be a Wiccan or Witch--had this terrible documented
Vatican disease!
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=5s3n0vg73j3ij1ft2osp6jnmugum9himi7%404ax.com
In this link above Seeber actually tells us that PERSECUTION IS
BIBLICAL! He tells us that the bible sanctions persecuting Christians
for not seeing religious matters as he does! This belief is far more
prevalent and hidden in society than you would ever imagine! Any
connection to the issues of atrocities taking place in Iraqi prisons?
President Bush was asked in early June after the Iraqi prison scandal
whether or not persecution was immoral. What was his answer? Remember
that he side-stepped the question? Seeber gave credit to President
George Bush. We're going to show you that the President gave
something in return actually earlier to people like Ted Seeber!
Where then are our priorities? Which is worse: to persecute? or to be
exposed for doing that? Why then was Ted Seeber ignored for years and
when we saw what he was doing and confronted him, we were attacked and
constantly accused of mental illness and hatred? Remember the Jack
Chick website documents this as a habit of the foot-soldiers of the
Pope? The conflicting issues in the discussions that took place on
the internet dealing with love and hate, can mainly be summed up by
the words of another highly unscrupulous person posting by the name of
Will Nordymeyer. He hated Brother McMillan immediately upon noting
what he had done to Ted Seeber, and so he moved in with attacks using
tactics we had often encountered by these strange killers: always on
the basis of love in Christianity. He was speaking to Brother Ted
McMillan when he leveled the typical accusation:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=3cd14f0f_5%40news5.uncensored-news.com&rnum=7
Nordmeyer:
> You are once again being hateful and non-Christian.
[This comment came because Brother McMillan exposed Ted Seeber and all
who aided and abbetted him. Exposing such people is the stated mandate
for Homeland Security. Brother Ted then wrote from a previous post:]
Ted McMillan:
> > A Super-terrorist has condemned all non-Catholics.
Nordmeyer:
> And Ted continues to call people names.
================
This is the direct response he gave after Brother Ted commented about
Ted Seeber condemning all non-Catholics to persecution and death!
Notice that Will Nordmeyer didn't bother to deny the claim? He
instead presents what he claims is a greater concern! This is typical
of most all of them, and they always charge those who expose them with
mental problems.
You think this is an isolated case where professed Christians by their
actions claim that to name-call is worse than to brutally slay many
people and even bible-believers? These same people constantly accuse
us to this date with being "anti-Catholics!" That was indeed even
their final conclusion after Ted Seeber approved of genocide, we
exposed him, and others moved in to defend him: that we were
anti-Catholic for exposing him!
Well, the story doesn't end there by no means. After Ted Seeber had
done his work and strange unscrupulous posters followed to aid him and
cover up what was done, another person having the same beliefs moved
forward and more boldly confirmed what Ted Seeber had said. Her name
posting is "Teresita." We bring her up since some of you may not be
convinced that Ted Seeber was deliberate in revealing how he thinks
all non-Catholics should at least die. We bring this up also since
others approached to constantly lie telling us Ted Seeber doesn't
represent the teachings or beliefs of the Vatican.
I made mention of that great Christian work Foxe's Book of Martyrs,
detailing centuries of uncountable murders of bible-believing
Christians performed by Rome after Ted Seeber's eye-opening behavior.
When I did that, Teresita, on 1/14/2003, referred to the work as:
"Foxe's Book of Hereticks." This is typical old Catholic language. She
therefore approved of their deaths because they viewed religion
differently:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=b0165u09im%40drn.newsguy.com
Naturally, we got on her case for her boldness here as we still have
the liberty to do in this free country.
Teresita in response to our inquiries, lied to us on 5/29/2003,
telling us that when she called Foxe's Book of Martyrs "Foxe's Book of
Heretics," she was only referring to the Albigenses of the Protestant
Reformation who were a minority group of Christians during that time:
How do we know she was lying? The Albigenses were hardly mentioned in
that massive work. Protestants usually have little to say about the
Albigenses BECAUSE BOTH THEMSELVES AND ALL THEIR WORKS WERE COMPLETELY
ANNIHILATED BY ROME! But more proof that she was lying comes in her
next response as she worked to divert from our advancing questions.
She belied her claim that she was only refering to the Albigenses when
she condemned the Christian martyrs as “hereticks” by condemning
Tyndale, who was NOT one of the Albigenses:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bcfbru0230p%40drn.newsguy.com
NEXT: When pressed further and further to reveal her beliefs she is
trained to hide on the matter of the value of human life
(non-Catholic), Teresita says the Vatican merely carried out God's
commands when they killed millions of Christians because the
Israelites did the same with their enemies. THE SAME ARGUMENT THAT
EXISTED DURING THE REFORMATION AND INQUISITIONS! Here she is freely
admitting that what she claimed were the words of all those
“Anti-Catholics” and “Catholic-haters” have been saying all along were
true. Here is that dialogue:
From: Teresita (tere...@newsguy.com)
Subject: Re: Teresita responds inappropriatly
Date: 2003-05-29 12:05:31 PST
In article <6s6bdv0l317i6dfjs...@4ax.com>, Susan says...
>Like Ted Seeber, you gave approval to their deaths and then come on
the forums telling me
>I hate people just because they disagree.
>
>We are still under Homeland Security right through to the destruction of this nation. We are
>asked to report all terrorist activity found in people who have a profound disrespect of human life!
Teresita replies:
We merely carried out God's commandment in His Eternal Word:
Deuteronomy 17:2-5 "If there is found among you, within any of your
towns which the Lord your God gives you, a man or woman who does what
is evil in the sight of the Lord your God, in transgressing his
covenant, and has gone and served other gods and worshiped them, or
the sun or the moon or any of the host of heaven, which I have
forbidden, and it is told you and you hear of it; then you shall
inquire diligently, and if it is true and certain that such an
abominable thing has been done in Israel, then you shall bring forth
to your gates that man or woman who has done this evil thing, and you
shall stone that man or woman to death with stones."
=================
Look at the words, "inquire diligently." She later supported the
INQUISITIONS.
Our comment:
ARE YOU LISTENING HOMELAND SECURITY??? She claims the scriptures
mandated their actions IN THE NEW TESTAMENT!! Is it the New Testament
now? Do those scriptures still exist now and have weight now IN THE
NEW TESTAMENT??
LASTLY AND MOST STRONGLY:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:thl175085396d&dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=bkkqlo0b0g%40drn.newsguy.com
After telling us that just to expose these facts about Rome she is now
boldly confirming is hatred, what would happen if we took a look at
what ANTI-PROTESTANTISM always was throughout the ages? When we
brought this issue about hatred up for her condemning the lives of all
non-Catholics, since she claims reporting about it is hatred, this is
how she declared Rome didn't hate her victims she was killing:
Susan Williams says...
>But super-terrorists--I mean SUPER-TERRORISTS, we are waiting for
>evidence. We were not born to listen to the worst killers on the
>earth who tell us what we must do, but when we expose how they are
>they tell the world we hate Catholics. They can kill all
>non-Catholics they say, BUT THEY DON'T HATE THEM!
[OPEN YOUR EARS AND LISTEN VERY CLOSELY TO THIS ONE!!!]
Teresita replies:
It's nothing personal. It's just business.
-- Encyclopedia Teresita
===========
YOU HEARD RIGHT!! FOLKS: DO YOU SEE THE TENSE OF SPEECH SHE IS
USING??? It is the PRESENT TENSE! Here is where begins the issue of
what all of this has to do with you.
In His Grace,
Susan
Don
> ... [snipped the usual paranoid rant] ...
Your selective ranting has avoided answering my question about how far you
think Christians should go in defence of the Faith? For that was Geloso's
point. Do you not have a point of view to offer? Go on, enlighten me!
> I will always get mad if anyone says all non-Catholics must die.
Yes, you have demonstrated this capably. But do you not think that it would
be better to direct your wrath against those who assert such a monstrous
thing rather than denounce me and all Catholics? Have you not fallen into
the trap that was so easily laid out for you, namely, that you have
broadcast your hateful anti-Catholic biggotry to the world? Do you really
think that biggotry is an appropriate response for someone who claims to be
a child of the one loving saviour? Did Jesus not turn his other cheek? While
you ... only hate and want to obliterate all those nasty Catholics? How
about winning us all round by the power of argument and a demonstration of
God's love? Christlike?
> >When did you first realise that you spoke for God in damning people who
did
> >not agree with you?
>
> As soon as they did not agree that all non-Catholics should live!
> Does God agree with you that all non-Catholics must die? He is not
> going to damn you?? The bible says HE WILL!
I don't think the bible has much to say about Catholics qua Catholics, or
Protestants qua Protestants for that matter. You, like your sixteenth
century protestant forebears, have usurped the authority of God and decided
on your own initiative to damn all Catholics yourself. Naughty, naughty,
Susan. Could you not wait until judgement day and let God do his own
judging? Is he so impotent in your eyes that he can't do his own judging?
And doesn't the bible say something about people not judging others? Or do
your sort not value the bible these days? Surely you should pay some
lip-service to what you claim to believe so strongly? Or is being full of
hate and biggotry really the right way to serve the loving God?
> >Do you think your response to me has been respectful and kind?
> Do you think people telling us all non-Catholics must die is kind?
The insurmountable problem for you, Susan, is that you are as guilty as I am
of believing that all non-Catholics should die. That is because neither of
us believes it or has asserted it (other than that I observed lightheartedly
that all men are mortal). You are such a biggot, so eaten up with irrational
hate, that you are totally blind to the fact. You could have had me as an
ally but instead you just lash out blindly. You are like a toddler having a
tantrum.
> YOU ARE DAMNED! YOU WILL DRINK EVERY DROP OF THE BLOOD YOU SPILL
> DOUBLE!
Thank you for those loving words, Susan. I am sure your saviour will be
proud of you. What a marvelous example you are for your professed faith to
be sure. And everyone can see it.
> Why do you imagine I'm a persecutor and full of hate that keeps you up
> at nights because I will still be upset at your friends posting that
> all non-Catholics must die?
They are your friends that say this, not mine. They write to you, not me. I
do not know them, you do. But I do agree that you are full of hate as you
suggest. Strange that from a professed Christian. I take it you are a
Christian aren't you? Or are you just trolling for fun like your friends?
Your quotation from "Shan" is very illuminating. His/her style, both
emotional and typographic (use of upper case, etc.), is so similar to yours.
Are you sure you, or one of your paranoid alter egos, didn't write all this
stuff to stimulate sympathy or to make you look good among lurkers in this
NG? How many free dinners have you obtained out of your righteous campaign
to destroy Catholicism? But again the disgusting perverted stuff that you
repeat so triumphantly seems rather too florid to be your own unaided work.
Has it not occurred to you, Susan, that the people you condemn as beastly
Catholics, might actually just be atheistic jerks who are having fun at your
expense? Are you not, in the final analysis, just too easy to wind up?
Wouldn't you not be better just getting down on your knees and praying for
forgiveness?
regards
Don
(not a Jesuit)
Susan Williams
>"Susan Williams" <SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:lhmfm0plieflprng0...@4ax.com...
>> ... [snipped the usual paranoid rant] ...
>
>Your selective ranting has avoided answering my question about how far you
>think Christians should go in defence of the Faith?
How far should Christians teach the world that if someone posts all
non-Catholics must die, we must be upset about this?
>For that was Geloso's
>point. Do you not have a point of view to offer? Go on, enlighten me!
Ted Seeber and Teresita told us that all non-Catholics must die. This
killer here concludes with the others that because I'm upset about it,
I'm hate, I'm a this and that and have yet to say a single off word
about the people who posted this.
What then would be his consistent judgments as documented by the Jack
Chick website: http://www.chick.com?
Susan:
>> I will always get mad if anyone says all non-Catholics must die.
>
>Yes, you have demonstrated this capably. But do you not think that it would
>be better to direct your wrath against those who assert such a monstrous
>thing rather than denounce me and all Catholics?
Because they didn't receive the wrath of Don for this, but Don knows
where hatred is in those only who are upset about it?
Do you think it would be likely that if the Jesuits are deadly and
unscrupulous as documented, they would conclude that I have denounced
all Catholics, including my own family members because I'm upset at
people who posted all non-Catholics must die and joins Don in only
exclusively attacking those upset about this?
>Have you not fallen into
>the trap that was so easily laid out for you,
Disagreeing with these damned Jesuit crusaders for free thought?
>namely, that you have
>broadcast your hateful anti-Catholic biggotry to the world?
Below is his friends posting how all non-Catholics must die. On the
historic Protestant websites and the Jack Chick website is documented
HOW ROME DOESN'T CHANGE.
>Do you really
>think that biggotry is an appropriate response for someone who claims to be
>a child of the one loving saviour?
Because I'm upset your friends posted that all non-Catholics must die
and you believe the same thing, Jesuit?
>Did Jesus not turn his other cheek?
SO WE SHOULD NOT HAVE PRE-EMPTIVELY ATTACKED IRAQ?
>While
>you ... only hate and want to obliterate all those nasty Catholics?
SHOW WHERE I WROTE ALL CATHOLIC MUST DIE, AND I WILL SHOW YOU BELOW
YOUR FRIENDS POSTING ALL NON-CATHOLIC MUST DIE, and it will not bother
you because you agree with them.
>How
>about winning us all round by the power of argument and a demonstration of
>God's love? Christlike?
Let me try even to protect my life first from you unscrupulous and
damned race of killers by announcing to the world the statements
against the lives of all non-Catholics and then the blasphemous
attempts to smother out the warnings as shown here.
>> >When did you first realise that you spoke for God in damning people who
>did
>> >not agree with you?
>>
>> As soon as they did not agree that all non-Catholics should live!
>> Does God agree with you that all non-Catholics must die? He is not
>> going to damn you?? The bible says HE WILL!
>
>I don't think the bible has much to say about Catholics qua Catholics, or
>Protestants qua Protestants for that matter.
I don't think the bible has much to say about exposing Catholics
telling us all on the newsgroups how all non-Catholics must die.
Obviously me exposing this bothers you immensely.
>ou, like your sixteenth
>century protestant forebears, have usurped the authority of God and decided
>on your own initiative to damn all Catholics yourself.
SHOW WHERE WE POSTED ALL CATHOLICS MUST DIE AND I'LL SHOW YOU BELOW
WHERE YOUR FRIENDS POSTED ALL NON-CATHOLIC MUST DIE THAT YOU WELL SAW!
>Naughty, naughty,
You mean me still refusing to believe that all non-Catholics must die,
and that because I expose your friends posting this, I am hate?
>Susan.
Yes, super-terrorist Jesuit killer?
>Could you not wait until judgement day and let God do his own
>judging?
Let me try and alert others first about billions of people called
non-Catholics whom your friends have posted should be extermnated. Do
you mind? TOO BAD!
>Is he so impotent in your eyes that he can't do his own judging?
Who then is gonna take care of "HATEFUL" Susan for her being upset
that your friends posted how all non-Catholics must die?
>And doesn't the bible say something about people not judging others?
Why doesn't it bother you that all non-Catholics have been judged and
condemned to die? I then am upset with the people on the newsgroups
who told us they must die who are fewer in number, and you blaspheme
the name of Christ to tell us he is as stupid as you think we are!
>Or do
>your sort not value the bible these days?
That all non-Catholics must die as your friends posted? Or that those
who are upset about this should be attacked by blasphemous lies and
accusations of hatred? SHOW ME!
>Surely you should pay some
>lip-service to what you claim to believe so strongly?
Like the right to disagree?
>Or is being full of
>hate and biggotry really the right way to serve the loving God?
How then can I convince you that all non-Catholics must live and stop
you from exclusively attacking people upset about your friends posting
how they all must die?
>> >Do you think your response to me has been respectful and kind?
We make pre-emptive attacks against people who believe Americans must
die because they made Arabs angry? What about others who believe much
more must die JUST BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT CATHOLIC?
>> Do you think people telling us all non-Catholics must die is kind?
>
>The insurmountable problem for you, Susan, is that you are as guilty as I am
>of believing that all non-Catholics should die.
Readers, GO BY THE ACTIONS AND NOT BY THE LIPS OF THE JESUITS! Too
much history of their capabilities. I am obviously upset about
something, and this super-terrorist criminal is upset about another!
>That is because neither of
>us believes it or has asserted it (other than that I observed lightheartedly
>that all men are mortal).
ACTIONS TELL OVER THE LIES OF THE JESUITS! Manhours and time expended
in condemning two different things here! With hateful accusations of
insanity and malice these new fangled psychiatrists know they cannot
leave "insane" posts.
>You are such a biggot,
Thank you O damned one! I have to do something right in life!
Why just because I believe all non-Catholics should live?
>so eaten up with irrational
>hate,
Because your friends posted how all non-Catholics must die and you are
absorbed in trying to stop me from exposing hatred?
>that you are totally blind to the fact.
That I should only attack people who are upset about your friends
posting how all non-Catholics must die?...
>You could have had me as an
>ally but instead you just lash out blindly. You are like a toddler having a
>tantrum.
Someone is getting very upset here, Jesuit! I STILL DON'T BELIEVE ALL
NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE DESPITE YOUR GOEBBELS TANTRUMS, YOUR BLASPHEMY
AND YOUR INCREDIBLE ABILITY TO LIE!
>> YOU ARE DAMNED! YOU WILL DRINK EVERY DROP OF THE BLOOD YOU SPILL
>> DOUBLE!
>
>Thank you for those loving words, Susan.
Like your friends posting how all non-Catholics must die?
What about these words that will be deemed hateful to you Jesuits...
Revelation 22:14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they
may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates
into the city.
15 For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and
MURDERERS, and idolaters, and WHOSOEVER LOVETH AND MAKETH A LIE!
>I am sure your saviour will be
>proud of you.
I flew planes into Afghanistan to show love?
>What a marvelous example you are for your professed faith to
>be sure. And everyone can see it.
That we should be upset at people exposing your friends posting how
all non-Catholics must die?
>> Why do you imagine I'm a persecutor and full of hate that keeps you up
>> at nights because I will still be upset at your friends posting that
>> all non-Catholics must die?
>
>They are your friends that say this, not mine.
I oppose those people just like I oppose you, and they give the same
tactics and responses. How can they be my friends when they condemned
even my life and not yours?
>They write to you, not me.
THEY POSTED THAT ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE. YOU ARE UPSET BECAUSE I
OPPOSED THEM FOR THIS.
>I do not know them, you do.
Even though you agree with them that all non-Catholics must die show
by your exclusive and undying opposition to those who report about
this?
>But I do agree that you are full of hate as you
>suggest.
But I do agree that it is only Jesuits who would publish that someone
is full of hate for exposing your race and cult publishing that all
non-Catholics must die!
They don't represent Rome? You do? What are you gonna do about their
postings as you are showing us now?
>Strange that from a professed Christian. I take it you are a
>Christian aren't you?
You mean that I am upset at your friends posting how all non-Catholics
must die? That's strange to a Jesuit?
>Or are you just trolling for fun like your friends?
You mean because I don't think all non-Catholics must die like you do
shown by your actions?
>Your quotation from "Shan" is very illuminating.
You're a Jesuit! You can't be upset at Shan for condemning the lives
of millions!
>His/her style, both
>emotional and typographic (use of upper case, etc.), is so similar to yours.
Your ignoring of the death mandates posted against all non-Catholics
is so similar to the documentaton given to us about the Jesuits on
Jack Chick's website...
>Are you sure you, or one of your paranoid alter egos, didn't write all this
>stuff to stimulate sympathy or to make you look good among lurkers in this
>NG?
Are you sure you are not a Jesuit for exclusively attacking people
upset that your friends posted how all non-Catholics must die?
The IP numbers are there! Who would be taught against paranoia from
Jesuits who track for dear life the posts of someone upset that the
lives of all non-Catholics have been condemned?
>How many free dinners have you obtained out of your righteous campaign
>to destroy Catholicism?
By objecting to your friends posting how all non-Catholics must die?
>But again the disgusting perverted stuff that you
>repeat so triumphantly seems rather too florid to be your own unaided work.
But I STILL DON'T BELIEVE THAT ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE FROM THE
UNCHANGING MURDER CULT!
>Has it not occurred to you, Susan, that the people you condemn as beastly
>Catholics, might actually just be atheistic jerks who are having fun at your
>expense?
THEY ARE MISREPRESENTING YOUR MURDER CULT, YOU MEAN?
>Are you not, in the final analysis, just too easy to wind up?
Is that why I make sure your clock never winds down?
>Wouldn't you not be better just getting down on your knees and praying for
>forgiveness?
I didn't condemn anyone to extermination despite the diagnoses of
hatred from the Jesuits who did do this against non-Catholics.
What do I need to be forgiven for? I do good to my neighbours!
I expose killers who want me and my neighbors killed!
And now a word from our sponsors...
14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have
right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the
city.
15 For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and
murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie.
Don
> Who then is gonna take care of "HATEFUL" Susan
Can you not get a place in a suitable institution? I am sure that you would
amply qualify for help.
> That all non-Catholics must die as your friends posted?
You know perfectly well that you are the only person who has corresponded
with them. Ergo they are your "friends", not mine.
> Thank you O damned one! I have to do something right in life!
Why have you "damned" me when I have not agreed with your hypothesis that
all non-Catholics should die? You know that I have never agreed with this
hypothesis. Why don't you read your bible and learn what love is. Clue: it
isn't hate.
You are completely insane. For all our sakes, please go and see a doctor
before you do something serious. That is the thing in life you can do right
as you suggest.
regards
Don
Susan Williams
>
>"Susan Williams" <SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:j45gm056kongktgdp...@4ax.com...
>
>> Who then is gonna take care of "HATEFUL" Susan
>
>Can you not get a place in a suitable institution? I am sure that you would
>amply qualify for help.
Why not give me the list of any institution that will incarcerate me
for believing all non-Catholics should live and for not knowing
there's no problem with 911 because all men die anyway!
You should find at least some back at your Vatican.
>> That all non-Catholics must die as your friends posted?
>
>You know perfectly well that you are the only person who has corresponded
>with them. Ergo they are your "friends", not mine.
They called me crazy also for believing all non-Catholics should live.
But then you approached because I didn't like the motion.
They think like you. They are your friends.
>> Thank you O damned one! I have to do something right in life!
>
>Why have you "damned" me when I have not agreed with your hypothesis that
>all non-Catholics should die?
BECAUSE YOU AGREE THAT ALL NON-CATHOLIC SHOULD DIE! You are a
Jesuit. You only attack those upset about your friends posting this,
but you can lie breathlessly like your friends.
Some posted that all non-Catholics must die. I'm upset about it. You
join the whole super-terrorist band to attack me only and cannot stop.
YOU BELIEVE ALL NON-CATHOLIC SHOULD DIE! EUREKA!!
I even show you the posts where they said that, and you attack only me
as hateful for showing it.
>You know that I have never agreed with this
>hypothesis.
Yes I know you agree with it fully just like all the others even
posting it.
>Why don't you read your bible and learn what love is. Clue: it
>isn't hate.
Good. But then why is love to you the idea that all non-Catholics
must die?
>You are completely insane.
Why am I insane for believing all non-Catholics must die, and why am I
insane enough to know that I have asked you and your other sub-animal
friends this question hundreds of times but your brand of psychiatry
board is always stunned at this new discovery question.
That includes the question of why you dumb and damned super-crimiinals
keep glued ot insane posts, except you leave the whole sea of insane
posts on the internet alone but mine?
>For all our sakes, please go and see a doctor
>before you do something serious.
AGAIN O DAMNED ONE...
SHOW ME THE LIST OF DOCTORS WHO THINK I AM SICK BECAUSE I'M UPSET THAT
YOUR FRIENDS POSTED THAT ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE!
I will take that list to the airwaves and shut the Vatican DOWN!
>That is the thing in life you can do right
>as you suggest.
>
>regards
>Don
LOOK AT THESE WORDS DAMNED DON...
Here is the story that has the super-criminals of the Pope hanging
around our posts. Why do we keep talking about 911 more than 3 years
after?
People posted that all non-Catholics must die. We were uspet about
it. Suddenly, as told us by Jack Chick, we have strange people from
different denominations attacking us ONLY and for years have refused
to say one bad word against those who did this.
Lest you forget the issue or evidence, here it is...
===========
Here's the bold death mandate against all non-Catholics this abandoned
despot ignores constantly to this day...
============
These Jesuits created a post entitled, "In Defense of the Church
Wiping Out Heretics!" You can find that thread here:
In response to this, since they violate all their lying tirades
against making attacks and accusations to attack us as hateful, we
responded with another thread entitled, "IN DEFENSE OF THE CHURCH
WIPING OUR HER NEIGHBOURS"
You can find that thread here:
The thread was expounding upon the Parable of the Good Samaritan where
Christ shows how those not of our religion should be treated contrary
to the mandates of Rome!
A man by the name of Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholic life when
with approval he told us that:
"NONE of the groups persecuted by the Catholics were living the Bible.
posts under the name of Teresita. When I made mention of that great
Christian work Foxe’s Book of Martyrs, detailing centuries of
uncountable murders of bible-believing Christians, she referred to the
work as:
"Foxe's Book of Hereticks." She therefore approved of their deaths
because they viewed religion differently:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=b0165u09im%40drn.newsguy.com
1/14/2003
Naturally, we got on her case for her boldness here as we still have
the liberty to do in this free country.
Teresita in response lied to us, telling us that when she called
Foxe's Book of Martyrs "Foxe's Book of Heretics," she was only
referring to the Albigenses of the Protestant Reformation 5/29/2003
who were a minority group of Christians during that time:
<http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bb521t01pej%40drn.newsguy.com&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dg:thl3424526807d%26dq%3D%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26selm%3Dbb521t01pej%2540drn.newsguy.com>
How do we know she was lying? The Albigenses were hardly mentioned in
that massive work. Protestants usually have little to say about the
Albigenses BECAUSE BOTH THEMSELVES AND ALL THEIR WORKS WERE COMPLETELY
ANNIHILATED BY ROME! But more proof that she was lying comes in her
next response as she worked to divert from my advancing questions:
Teresita belied her claim that she was only refering to the Albigenses
when she condemned the Christian martyrs as “hereticks” by condemning
Tyndale, who was not one of the Albigenses:
<http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bcfbru0230p%40drn.newsguy.com>
NEXT:
When pressed further and further to reveal her beliefs she is trained
to hide on the matter of the value of human life, Teresita says the
Vatican merely carried out God's commands when they killed millions of
Christians because the Israelites did the same with their enemies.
Here she is freely admitting what all those “Anti-Catholics” and
“Catholic-haters” have been saying all along:
Here is that dialogue below:
From: Teresita (tere...@newsguy.com)
Subject: Re: Teresita responds inappropriatly
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist,
alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, tnn.religion.catholic
Date: 2003-05-29 12:05:31 PST
In article <6s6bdv0l317i6dfjs...@4ax.com>, Susan says...
>
>Like Ted Seeber, you gave approval to their deaths and then come on the forums telling me I hate people just because they disagree.
>
>We are still under Homeland Security right through to the destruction of this nation. We are asked to report all terrorist activity found
>in people who have a profound disrespect of human life!
Teresita replies:
We merely carried out God's commandment in His Eternal Word:
Deuteronomy 17:2-5 "If there is found among you, within any of your
towns which the Lord your God gives you, a man or woman who does what
is evil in the sight of the Lord your God, in transgressing his
covenant, and has gone and served other gods and worshiped them, or
the sun or the moon or any of the host of heaven, which I have
forbidden, and it is told you and you hear of it; then you shall
inquire diligently, and if it is true and certain that such an
abominable thing has been done in Israel, then you shall bring forth
to your gates that man or woman who has done this evil thing, and you
shall stone that man or woman to death with stones."
From: Teresita (tere...@newsguy.com)
Subject: Re: #TWO "CULT" COMPARED better version
View: Complete Thread (21 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist,
alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, tnn.religion.catholic
Date: 2003-09-21 11:52:08 PST
In article <3dqrmvoit629haa6l...@4ax.com>, Susan
Williams says...
>
>I saw an official Catholic website on the Inquisition that said the same
>thing Teresita said: That Rome can put non-Catholics to death based
>upon the word of God.
Leviticus 24:16 Anyone who blasphemes the name of the LORD must be put
to death.
The entire assembly must stone him. Whether an alien or native-born,
when he
blasphemes the Name, he must be put to death.
--
Encyclopedia Teresita
http://web.newsguy.com/teresita
ARE YOU LISTENING HOMELAND SECURITY??? She claims the scriptures
mandated their actions IN THE NEW TESTAMENT!! Is it the New Testament
now? Do those scriptures still exist now and have weight now IN THE
NEW TESTAMENT??
LASTLY AND MOST STRONGLY:
After telling us that just to expose these facts about Rome she is now
boldly admitting is hatred, what would happen if we took a look at
what ANTI-PROTESTANTISM always was throughout the ages? When we
brought this issue about hatred up for her condemning the lives of all
non-Catholics, this is how she declared Rome didn’t hate her victims
she was killing:
I wrote:
In article <3dqrmvoit629haa6l...@4ax.com>, Susan
Williams says...
>But super-terrorists--I mean SUPER-TERRORISTS, we are waiting for
>evidence. We were not born to listen to the worst killers on the
>earth who tell us what we must do, but when we expose how they are
>they tell the world we hate Catholics. They can kill all
>non-Catholics they say, BUT THEY DON'T HATE THEM!
Teresita replies:
It's nothing personal. It's just business.
--
Encyclopedia Teresita
Now the man who was ready to pull out his hair telling us that Ted
Super-terrorist William Suzanne:
Watch the demon work:
=============
In His Grace,
Susan Williams
x-- 100 Proof News - http://www.100ProofNews.com
an0...@hotmail.com
<SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hey Susie!
How about them "Jews"??
Where do they stand..?
Susan Williams
<SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote:
I mean DISbelieve all non-Catholics must die...
x-- 100 Proof News - http://www.100ProofNews.com
Susan Williams
Are they non-Catholics? Have I been saying, unlike you, that all
non-Catholics should live?
We "insane" non-Jesuits have to help you killers!
Here are some words again. Go through them and expound to us what
they say and mean, super-terrorist!...
Susan Williams
As you can see, the super-criminal joins all the other psychiatrists
in saying my posts are insane and incoherent, so they naturally do
what all others do with posts that are constantly incoherent...
ASK QUESTIONS!!
Here are the words super-terrorists have to skip around and avoid
expounding upon and explaining line by line...
Don
Yawn
regards
Don
Kenna
I'm guessing now that you are infact a catholic yourself and trying to
rev people up, and causing inter-denomenational trouble. It makes no
sense whatsoever anything you are saying.
Were's the fact..... NOT POSTINGS.... I mean actual facts, articles,
photos. Postings on here are'nt facts. Get us some real info if you
believe all this stuff. Once again postings by individuals are not
fact, not facts not fact not fact not facts not facts are not fact,
not facts not fact not fact not facts not facts are not fact, not
facts not fact not fact not facts not facts are not fact, not facts
not fact not fact not facts not facts are not fact, not facts not fact
not fact not facts not facts are not fact, not facts not fact not fact
not facts not facts!!!!!!!!!!
Susan Williams
>Susan,
>
>I'm guessing now that you are infact a catholic yourself and trying to
>rev people up, and causing inter-denomenational trouble. It makes no
>sense whatsoever anything you are saying.
By objecting to people posting that all non-Catholics must die as you
believe?
>Were's the fact..... NOT POSTINGS.... I mean actual facts, articles,
>photos. Postings on here are'nt facts.
Where's the actual facts that I'm crazy and hateful for objecting to
your friends posting that all non-Catholics must die?
Facts proving this are below!
>et us some real info if you
>believe all this stuff. Once again postings by individuals are not
>fact, not facts not fact not fact not facts not facts are not fact,
>not facts not fact not fact not facts not facts are not fact, not
>facts not fact not fact not facts not facts are not fact, not facts
>not fact not fact not facts not facts are not fact, not facts not fact
>not fact not facts not facts are not fact, not facts not fact not fact
>not facts not facts!!!!!!!!!!
Here is the story that has the super-criminals of the Pope hanging
===========
============
NEXT:
LASTLY AND MOST STRONGLY:
--
Encyclopedia Teresita
Super-terrorist William Suzanne:
Watch the demon work:
=============
In His Grace,
Susan Williams
x-- 100 Proof News - http://www.100ProofNews.com
Susan Williams
He's upset about abortion?
===========
============
NEXT:
LASTLY AND MOST STRONGLY:
--
Encyclopedia Teresita
Super-terrorist William Suzanne:
Watch the demon work:
=============
In His Grace,
Susan Williams
x-- 100 Proof News - http://www.100ProofNews.com
Kenna
I asked about evidence and once again you referred to a posting. I
said get me real evidence. Once again, evidence consists of photos,
recordings videotape. You need to get this before I will believe you.
Now if you did THAT, that would make for an interesting post.
Please don't just go "here's the evidence" and copy and paste yet a
nother boring post. Get us evidence ......counting on you Susan to
come through for us.
Don't forget, watch a few episodes of Macgyver, or Jag before you
sneak in to get the evidence. Enjoy the mission my fellow
protestant!!!!! Onward Christian soldier and all that.
Laura Bush murdered her boy friend
> I, Susan Williams, was again confronted with Jesuit excuses for the
> fact that Terrorists staged a daring attacking during 911 involving
> planes traveling awesome distances into the most controlled airspace
> in America as if they knew the plan would go through.
>
Yup - 4 commercial jets were hijacked and flew 100s of miles off
course for over an hour and the AF never turned a wheel. But there's
no way the bush gang was involved.
Susan Williams
>According to Susan Williams it was the pope.... not Bush!!!! Or was
>it Bush and the Pope. Or was it the Pope, Bush and the Deli Lama walk
>on to a 737................. ;-)
You mean here are the words below you are avoiding?...
They are then followed by other super-terrorists who attack us alone.
That is because we object to those posts demanding the destruction of
all non-Catholics.
From there they patiently babble to us in lies, telling us they are
not the deadly foot-soldiers of the Pope!
Susan Williams
>
>"Kenna" <starb...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:c787cdb7.04101...@posting.google.com...
>> According to Susan Williams it was the pope.... not Bush!!!! Or was
>> it Bush and the Pope. Or was it the Pope, Bush and the Deli Lama walk
>> on to a 737................. ;-)
>
>
>Now that is witty!
>
>regards
>Don
As "witty" as Jesuit Don who labors much and posts and posts
complaints with insults claiming I am insane and yet can't leave my
threads? The Jesuit Oath says a Jesuit is to make "RELENTLESS" or
non-ceasing war against their enemies.
Jesuits Don, Kenna and a host of others waste much manhours in
constant posts, but ignore my just simple request TO EXPOUND UPON THE
WORDS BELOW WHERE THEIR FRIENDS CLAIM ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE!
Dear friends:
Here we are again with an urgent appeal to you. Things have gotten so
out of hand, that we wonder why even try. Viewing that the issues at
hand involve much blood however, we have to ask again and try again.
It is not a pleasant task, but we have to do it. Feast your eyes on
the following very incredible posts. They represent a nightmare we
have been facing for years. Some of the most amazing people capable of
acts no criminal in jail can commit have been getting bolder and
bolder in their posts on the newsgroups. Their boldness corresponds to
the actions of those currently in leadership capacity in the United
States and all over the world specifically in government, media,
education and even religion. As events toward change move more and
more rapidly they become more and more bold. Take a look at these
taken from the Google Newsgroups Archives. We first meet a poster who
is very very upset about something. What is he upset about?...
From: Shan (shank...@yahoo.com)
Subject: Re: #DEVIL SUSAN ANGRY COULDN'T PROVE ROME DEMANDS DEATHS OF
ALL NON-CATHOLICS!
Date: 2003-10-22 05:57:44 PST
I want you Harlot Bitch Whore SUSAN and your
cohorts to die.
ALL ADVENTISTS, LATTER DAY MORONS AND JEHOVAH'S NUTNESSES ARE FROM
SATAN AND MUST DIE.
Shan
[Look at what he is writing. You can see he is more than upset. What
could have caused him to be this upset? Surely, you must be saying,
he is just a little perturbed and doesn't mean what he is saying. Is
that true? Watch now as he makes sure that everyone understands
clearly what he is writing...]
From: Shan (shank...@yahoo.com)
Subject: Re: #DEVIL SUSAN ANGRY COULDN'T PROVE ROME DEMANDS DEATHS OF
ALL NON-CATHOLICS!
Date: 2003-10-20 14:59:55 PST
Hey Harlot Susan Whore, for your sake, just to please your evil
nature, I am going to write it down in uppercase:
I THE UNDERSIGNED CONDEMN ALL ADVENTISTS, LATTER DAY MORONS AND
JEHOVAH'S NUTNESS TO EXTERMINATION.
ALL OTHER PROTESTANTS ARE SPARED.
SHAN
In His Grace,
Susan
Shan
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=bne2iq01kmn%40drn.newsguy.com
-- Encyclopedia Teresita
=========
=========
-- Encyclopedia Teresita
================
NONE of the groups persecuted by the Catholics were living the Bible.
================
===========================
Pope?
================
I made mention of that great Christian work Foxe's Book of Martyrs,
detailing centuries of uncountable murders of bible-believing
Christians performed by Rome after Ted Seeber's eye-opening behavior.
When I did that, Teresita, on 1/14/2003, referred to the work as:
"Foxe's Book of Hereticks." This is typical old Catholic language. She
therefore approved of their deaths because they viewed religion
differently:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=b0165u09im%40drn.newsguy.com
Naturally, we got on her case for her boldness here as we still have
the liberty to do in this free country.
Teresita in response to our inquiries, lied to us on 5/29/2003,
telling us that when she called Foxe's Book of Martyrs "Foxe's Book of
Heretics," she was only referring to the Albigenses of the Protestant
Reformation who were a minority group of Christians during that time:
http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bb521t01pej%40drn.newsguy.com&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dg:thl3424526807d%26dq%3D%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26selm%3Dbb521t01pej%2540drn.newsguy.com
How do we know she was lying? The Albigenses were hardly mentioned in
that massive work. Protestants usually have little to say about the
Albigenses BECAUSE BOTH THEMSELVES AND ALL THEIR WORKS WERE COMPLETELY
ANNIHILATED BY ROME! But more proof that she was lying comes in her
next response as she worked to divert from our advancing questions.
She belied her claim that she was only refering to the Albigenses when
she condemned the Christian martyrs as “hereticks” by condemning
Tyndale, who was NOT one of the Albigenses:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bcfbru0230p%40drn.newsguy.com
NEXT: When pressed further and further to reveal her beliefs she is
trained to hide on the matter of the value of human life
(non-Catholic), Teresita says the Vatican merely carried out God's
commands when they killed millions of Christians because the
Israelites did the same with their enemies. THE SAME ARGUMENT THAT
EXISTED DURING THE REFORMATION AND INQUISITIONS! Here she is freely
admitting that what she claimed were the words of all those
“Anti-Catholics” and “Catholic-haters” have been saying all along were
true. Here is that dialogue:
From: Teresita (tere...@newsguy.com)
Subject: Re: Teresita responds inappropriatly
Date: 2003-05-29 12:05:31 PST
In article <6s6bdv0l317i6dfjs...@4ax.com>, Susan says...
>Like Ted Seeber, you gave approval to their deaths and then come on
the forums telling me
>I hate people just because they disagree.
>
>We are still under Homeland Security right through to the destruction of this nation. We are
>asked to report all terrorist activity found in people who have a profound disrespect of human life!
Teresita replies:
We merely carried out God's commandment in His Eternal Word:
Deuteronomy 17:2-5 "If there is found among you, within any of your
towns which the Lord your God gives you, a man or woman who does what
is evil in the sight of the Lord your God, in transgressing his
covenant, and has gone and served other gods and worshiped them, or
the sun or the moon or any of the host of heaven, which I have
forbidden, and it is told you and you hear of it; then you shall
inquire diligently, and if it is true and certain that such an
abominable thing has been done in Israel, then you shall bring forth
to your gates that man or woman who has done this evil thing, and you
shall stone that man or woman to death with stones."
=================
Look at the words, "inquire diligently." She later supported the
INQUISITIONS. Our comment:
ARE YOU LISTENING HOMELAND SECURITY??? She claims the scriptures
mandated their actions IN THE NEW TESTAMENT!! Is it the New Testament
now? Do those scriptures still exist now and have weight now IN THE
NEW TESTAMENT??
LASTLY AND MOST STRONGLY:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:thl175085396d&dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=bkkqlo0b0g%40drn.newsguy.com
After telling us that just to expose these facts about Rome she is now
boldly confirming is hatred, what would happen if we took a look at
what ANTI-PROTESTANTISM always was throughout the ages? When we
brought this issue about hatred up for her condemning the lives of all
non-Catholics, since she claims reporting about it is hatred, this is
how she declared Rome didn't hate her victims she was killing:
Susan Williams says...
>But super-terrorists--I mean SUPER-TERRORISTS, we are waiting for
>evidence. We were not born to listen to the worst killers on the
>earth who tell us what we must do, but when we expose how they are
>they tell the world we hate Catholics. They can kill all
>non-Catholics they say, BUT THEY DON'T HATE THEM!
[OPEN YOUR EARS AND LISTEN VERY CLOSELY TO THIS ONE!!!]
Teresita replies:
It's nothing personal. It's just business.
-- Encyclopedia Teresita
===========
YOU HEARD RIGHT!! FOLKS: DO YOU SEE THE TENSE OF SPEECH SHE IS
USING??? It is the PRESENT TENSE! Here is where begins the issue of
what all of this has to do with you.
From since that time we have been posting these words quite
prolifically--literally hundreds of times and often attached to most
of my posts. Soon people claiming to be Baptists, Lutherans and other
Protestant denominations moved forward to complain telling us we were
not to post that “nonsense” on their newsgroups! To my disgust, but
not my amazement I found another topic that wasn't declared "nonsense"
being discussed. Check this modified posting just issued 3/17/2004
where I comment in complaint:
===========
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=cuai505loirs2lud8irmmstidsl7psmslh%404ax.com
Marcus Wesson murders nine (recent issue in March). Is this posted on
the Lutheran newsgroups deadly infested with Jesuits? YES!
[They had no problem with discussing Marcus Wesson: the man
(Seventh-day Adventist) accused of murdering some 9 members of his
family.]
6,000 people died September 11th [actually 3,000]. Is that worthy to
be put on the Lutheran newsgroups? The Jesuits agree... YES!
Now we find many people who both issued and supported bold death
mandates AGAINST BILLIONS OF PEOPLE just for not being Catholic! What
do the Jesuits tell me?
They tell me I'm mental and ask me why I'm bringing "that nonsense" on
the newsgroups!
In His Grace,
Susan
Susan Williams
Kenna
You write:
"From there they patiently babble to us in lies, telling us they are
not the deadly foot-soldiers of the Pope!"
That is without doubt the most ludricous statement I've ever heard. I
am no longer a member of the 1st Vatican Deadly foot soldier Brigade.
They kicked me out for not being CATHOLIC.
\hahahahahaha!!!!!!
Later Suzie Q
Don
Ha, ha, ha, ...
regards
Don
Don
> ... (same old tired, bigoted, paranoid, irrational clap-trap) ...
You are avoiding the question I put to you which is:
To what extent should you go to defend the Faith?
We have heard Mr. Geloso's extreme answer. But what is yours?
As I've said before, maybe you don't consider the Faith worth defending.
regards
Don
Don
> He's upset about abortion?
Who mentioned abortion?
Have you realised, Susan, that you bear the greatest responsibility for
repeating, repeating, repeating the assertion that "all non-Catholics must
die."
Maybe that is the way you want to be remembered?
regards
Don
Don
news:cko9t0$8cr$1...@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk...
But seriously, Susan, can you explain to me how it is that your belief that
President Bush was involved in the plot to fly airliners into the twin
towers is related to your much repeated mantra that all non-Catholics must
die?
I, for one, don't get it.
regards
Don
Kenna
Jesuit. :-)
I don't eve3n know what one of them is really. Except some monks,
which makes her point even dumber. But I guess if it was'nt for the
Catholics susan would be a Jew hahahahahaha.
Don
Kenna,
I do believe we have lost Susan Williams before she has even given us the
courtesy of answering our civil questions. You asked for evidence and I
asked for her opinion on self-defence of the Faith. It is a pity we shall
now remain ignorant despite the undoubted evangelical fervour of our silent
guru.
What a shame!
Susan Williams
>"Susan Williams" <SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:r89om0p8mdqg8aaiv...@4ax.com...
>> He's upset about abortion?
>
>Who mentioned abortion?
>
>
>Have you realised, Susan, that you bear the greatest responsibility for
>repeating, repeating, repeating the assertion that "all non-Catholics must
>die."
I'LL KEEP SOUNDING IT TO THE HOUSETOPS TILL THOSE WHO MAKE SUCH
STATEMENTS RECEIVE JUSTICE!
Thus far, your reaction is to ask me where is my love.
>Maybe that is the way you want to be remembered?
>
>regards
>Don
Here are more killers revealing themselves, damned Jesuit Don:...
Dear friends:
Here we are again with an urgent appeal to you. Things have gotten so
out of hand, that we wonder why even try. Viewing that the issues at
hand involve much blood however, we have to ask again and try again.
It is not a pleasant task, but we have to do it. Feast your eyes on
the following very incredible posts. They represent a nightmare we
have been facing for years. Some of the most amazing people capable of
acts no criminal in jail can commit have been getting bolder and
bolder in their posts on the newsgroups. Their boldness corresponds to
the actions of those currently in leadership capacity in the United
States and all over the world specifically in government, media,
education and even religion. As events toward change move more and
more rapidly they become more and more bold. Take a look at these
taken from the Google Newsgroups Archives. We first meet a poster who
is very very upset about something. What is he upset about?...
From: Shan (shank...@yahoo.com)
Subject: Re: #DEVIL SUSAN ANGRY COULDN'T PROVE ROME DEMANDS DEATHS OF
ALL NON-CATHOLICS!
Date: 2003-10-22 05:57:44 PST
I want you Harlot Bitch Whore SUSAN and your
cohorts to die.
ALL ADVENTISTS, LATTER DAY MORONS AND JEHOVAH'S NUTNESSES ARE FROM
SATAN AND MUST DIE.
Shan
[Look at what he is writing. You can see he is more than upset. What
could have caused him to be this upset? Surely, you must be saying,
he is just a little perturbed and doesn't mean what he is saying. Is
that true? Watch now as he makes sure that everyone understands
clearly what he is writing...]
From: Shan (shank...@yahoo.com)
Subject: Re: #DEVIL SUSAN ANGRY COULDN'T PROVE ROME DEMANDS DEATHS OF
ALL NON-CATHOLICS!
Date: 2003-10-20 14:59:55 PST
Hey Harlot Susan Whore, for your sake, just to please your evil
nature, I am going to write it down in uppercase:
I THE UNDERSIGNED CONDEMN ALL ADVENTISTS, LATTER DAY MORONS AND
JEHOVAH'S NUTNESS TO EXTERMINATION.
ALL OTHER PROTESTANTS ARE SPARED.
SHAN
In His Grace,
Susan
Shan
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=bne2iq01kmn%40drn.newsguy.com
-- Encyclopedia Teresita
=========
=========
-- Encyclopedia Teresita
================
NONE of the groups persecuted by the Catholics were living the Bible.
================
===========================
Pope?
================
I made mention of that great Christian work Foxe's Book of Martyrs,
detailing centuries of uncountable murders of bible-believing
Christians performed by Rome after Ted Seeber's eye-opening behavior.
When I did that, Teresita, on 1/14/2003, referred to the work as:
"Foxe's Book of Hereticks." This is typical old Catholic language. She
therefore approved of their deaths because they viewed religion
differently:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=b0165u09im%40drn.newsguy.com
Naturally, we got on her case for her boldness here as we still have
the liberty to do in this free country.
Teresita in response to our inquiries, lied to us on 5/29/2003,
telling us that when she called Foxe's Book of Martyrs "Foxe's Book of
Heretics," she was only referring to the Albigenses of the Protestant
Reformation who were a minority group of Christians during that time:
http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bb521t01pej%40drn.newsguy.com&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dg:thl3424526807d%26dq%3D%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26selm%3Dbb521t01pej%2540drn.newsguy.com
How do we know she was lying? The Albigenses were hardly mentioned in
that massive work. Protestants usually have little to say about the
Albigenses BECAUSE BOTH THEMSELVES AND ALL THEIR WORKS WERE COMPLETELY
ANNIHILATED BY ROME! But more proof that she was lying comes in her
next response as she worked to divert from our advancing questions.
She belied her claim that she was only refering to the Albigenses when
she condemned the Christian martyrs as “hereticks” by condemning
Tyndale, who was NOT one of the Albigenses:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bcfbru0230p%40drn.newsguy.com
NEXT: When pressed further and further to reveal her beliefs she is
trained to hide on the matter of the value of human life
(non-Catholic), Teresita says the Vatican merely carried out God's
commands when they killed millions of Christians because the
Israelites did the same with their enemies. THE SAME ARGUMENT THAT
EXISTED DURING THE REFORMATION AND INQUISITIONS! Here she is freely
admitting that what she claimed were the words of all those
“Anti-Catholics” and “Catholic-haters” have been saying all along were
true. Here is that dialogue:
From: Teresita (tere...@newsguy.com)
Subject: Re: Teresita responds inappropriatly
Date: 2003-05-29 12:05:31 PST
In article <6s6bdv0l317i6dfjs...@4ax.com>, Susan says...
>Like Ted Seeber, you gave approval to their deaths and then come on
the forums telling me
>I hate people just because they disagree.
>
>We are still under Homeland Security right through to the destruction of this nation. We are
>asked to report all terrorist activity found in people who have a profound disrespect of human life!
Teresita replies:
We merely carried out God's commandment in His Eternal Word:
Deuteronomy 17:2-5 "If there is found among you, within any of your
towns which the Lord your God gives you, a man or woman who does what
is evil in the sight of the Lord your God, in transgressing his
covenant, and has gone and served other gods and worshiped them, or
the sun or the moon or any of the host of heaven, which I have
forbidden, and it is told you and you hear of it; then you shall
inquire diligently, and if it is true and certain that such an
abominable thing has been done in Israel, then you shall bring forth
to your gates that man or woman who has done this evil thing, and you
shall stone that man or woman to death with stones."
=================
Look at the words, "inquire diligently." She later supported the
INQUISITIONS. Our comment:
ARE YOU LISTENING HOMELAND SECURITY??? She claims the scriptures
mandated their actions IN THE NEW TESTAMENT!! Is it the New Testament
now? Do those scriptures still exist now and have weight now IN THE
NEW TESTAMENT??
LASTLY AND MOST STRONGLY:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:thl175085396d&dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=bkkqlo0b0g%40drn.newsguy.com
After telling us that just to expose these facts about Rome she is now
boldly confirming is hatred, what would happen if we took a look at
what ANTI-PROTESTANTISM always was throughout the ages? When we
brought this issue about hatred up for her condemning the lives of all
non-Catholics, since she claims reporting about it is hatred, this is
how she declared Rome didn't hate her victims she was killing:
Susan Williams says...
>But super-terrorists--I mean SUPER-TERRORISTS, we are waiting for
>evidence. We were not born to listen to the worst killers on the
>earth who tell us what we must do, but when we expose how they are
>they tell the world we hate Catholics. They can kill all
>non-Catholics they say, BUT THEY DON'T HATE THEM!
[OPEN YOUR EARS AND LISTEN VERY CLOSELY TO THIS ONE!!!]
Teresita replies:
It's nothing personal. It's just business.
-- Encyclopedia Teresita
===========
YOU HEARD RIGHT!! FOLKS: DO YOU SEE THE TENSE OF SPEECH SHE IS
USING??? It is the PRESENT TENSE! Here is where begins the issue of
what all of this has to do with you.
From since that time we have been posting these words quite
prolifically--literally hundreds of times and often attached to most
of my posts. Soon people claiming to be Baptists, Lutherans and other
Protestant denominations moved forward to complain telling us we were
not to post that “nonsense” on their newsgroups! To my disgust, but
not my amazement I found another topic that wasn't declared "nonsense"
being discussed. Check this modified posting just issued 3/17/2004
where I comment in complaint:
===========
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=cuai505loirs2lud8irmmstidsl7psmslh%404ax.com
Marcus Wesson murders nine (recent issue in March). Is this posted on
the Lutheran newsgroups deadly infested with Jesuits? YES!
[They had no problem with discussing Marcus Wesson: the man
(Seventh-day Adventist) accused of murdering some 9 members of his
family.]
6,000 people died September 11th [actually 3,000]. Is that worthy to
be put on the Lutheran newsgroups? The Jesuits agree... YES!
Now we find many people who both issued and supported bold death
mandates AGAINST BILLIONS OF PEOPLE just for not being Catholic! What
do the Jesuits tell me?
They tell me I'm mental and ask me why I'm bringing "that nonsense" on
the newsgroups!
In His Grace,
Susan
Susan Williams
>Susan ,
>
>You write:
>
>"From there they patiently babble to us in lies, telling us they are
>not the deadly foot-soldiers of the Pope!"
>
>That is without doubt the most ludricous statement I've ever heard.
Yeah, but see I'm different from you. I'm posting evidence that
DAMNED KILLERS JUST LIKE YOU SUPPORTED GENOCIDE DECLARING THAT ALL
NON-CATHOLICS SHOULD AND MUST BE EXTERMINATED. I'm upset about this.
Since then, you attack me because I'm upset.
How are things then going to look in your eternally damned eyes?
You trail posts you call insane. Your mind is healthy?
>I am no longer a member of the 1st Vatican Deadly foot soldier Brigade.
>They kicked me out for not being CATHOLIC.
>
>\hahahahahaha!!!!!!
>
>Later Suzie Q
HERE ARE YOU FELLOW DAMNED KILLER FRIENDS CONDEMNING NON-CATHOLIS TO
EXTERMINATION:
Shan
In His Grace,
Susan
Shan
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=bne2iq01kmn%40drn.newsguy.com
-- Encyclopedia Teresita
=========
=========
-- Encyclopedia Teresita
================
NONE of the groups persecuted by the Catholics were living the Bible.
================
===========================
================
I made mention of that great Christian work Foxe's Book of Martyrs,
detailing centuries of uncountable murders of bible-believing
Christians performed by Rome after Ted Seeber's eye-opening behavior.
When I did that, Teresita, on 1/14/2003, referred to the work as:
"Foxe's Book of Hereticks." This is typical old Catholic language. She
therefore approved of their deaths because they viewed religion
differently:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=b0165u09im%40drn.newsguy.com
Naturally, we got on her case for her boldness here as we still have
the liberty to do in this free country.
Teresita in response to our inquiries, lied to us on 5/29/2003,
telling us that when she called Foxe's Book of Martyrs "Foxe's Book of
Heretics," she was only referring to the Albigenses of the Protestant
Reformation who were a minority group of Christians during that time:
http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bb521t01pej%40drn.newsguy.com&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dg:thl3424526807d%26dq%3D%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26selm%3Dbb521t01pej%2540drn.newsguy.com
How do we know she was lying? The Albigenses were hardly mentioned in
that massive work. Protestants usually have little to say about the
Albigenses BECAUSE BOTH THEMSELVES AND ALL THEIR WORKS WERE COMPLETELY
ANNIHILATED BY ROME! But more proof that she was lying comes in her
next response as she worked to divert from our advancing questions.
She belied her claim that she was only refering to the Albigenses when
she condemned the Christian martyrs as “hereticks” by condemning
Tyndale, who was NOT one of the Albigenses:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bcfbru0230p%40drn.newsguy.com
NEXT: When pressed further and further to reveal her beliefs she is
trained to hide on the matter of the value of human life
(non-Catholic), Teresita says the Vatican merely carried out God's
commands when they killed millions of Christians because the
Israelites did the same with their enemies. THE SAME ARGUMENT THAT
EXISTED DURING THE REFORMATION AND INQUISITIONS! Here she is freely
admitting that what she claimed were the words of all those
“Anti-Catholics” and “Catholic-haters” have been saying all along were
true. Here is that dialogue:
From: Teresita (tere...@newsguy.com)
Subject: Re: Teresita responds inappropriatly
Date: 2003-05-29 12:05:31 PST
In article <6s6bdv0l317i6dfjs...@4ax.com>, Susan says...
>Like Ted Seeber, you gave approval to their deaths and then come on
the forums telling me
>I hate people just because they disagree.
>
>We are still under Homeland Security right through to the destruction of this nation. We are
>asked to report all terrorist activity found in people who have a profound disrespect of human life!
Teresita replies:
We merely carried out God's commandment in His Eternal Word:
Deuteronomy 17:2-5 "If there is found among you, within any of your
towns which the Lord your God gives you, a man or woman who does what
is evil in the sight of the Lord your God, in transgressing his
covenant, and has gone and served other gods and worshiped them, or
the sun or the moon or any of the host of heaven, which I have
forbidden, and it is told you and you hear of it; then you shall
inquire diligently, and if it is true and certain that such an
abominable thing has been done in Israel, then you shall bring forth
to your gates that man or woman who has done this evil thing, and you
shall stone that man or woman to death with stones."
=================
Look at the words, "inquire diligently." She later supported the
INQUISITIONS. Our comment:
ARE YOU LISTENING HOMELAND SECURITY??? She claims the scriptures
mandated their actions IN THE NEW TESTAMENT!! Is it the New Testament
now? Do those scriptures still exist now and have weight now IN THE
NEW TESTAMENT??
LASTLY AND MOST STRONGLY:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:thl175085396d&dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=bkkqlo0b0g%40drn.newsguy.com
After telling us that just to expose these facts about Rome she is now
boldly confirming is hatred, what would happen if we took a look at
what ANTI-PROTESTANTISM always was throughout the ages? When we
brought this issue about hatred up for her condemning the lives of all
non-Catholics, since she claims reporting about it is hatred, this is
how she declared Rome didn't hate her victims she was killing:
Susan Williams says...
>But super-terrorists--I mean SUPER-TERRORISTS, we are waiting for
>evidence. We were not born to listen to the worst killers on the
>earth who tell us what we must do, but when we expose how they are
>they tell the world we hate Catholics. They can kill all
>non-Catholics they say, BUT THEY DON'T HATE THEM!
[OPEN YOUR EARS AND LISTEN VERY CLOSELY TO THIS ONE!!!]
Teresita replies:
It's nothing personal. It's just business.
-- Encyclopedia Teresita
===========
===========
In His Grace,
Susan
Susan Williams
>"Susan Williams" <SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:gdjtm0lot6uj6ruvr...@4ax.com...
>
>> ... (same old tired, bigoted, paranoid, irrational clap-trap) ...
>
>
>You are avoiding the question I put to you which is:
>
>To what extent should you go to defend the Faith?
You don't avoid questions, O damned one? Why did your friends post
that all non-Catholics should be exterminated, and why have you
defended them to date?
>We have heard Mr. Geloso's extreme answer. But what is yours?
>
>As I've said before, maybe you don't consider the Faith worth defending.
>
>regards
>Don
HERE ARE YOUR FELLOW DAMNED KILLER FRIENDS POSTING THAT ALL
NON-CATHOLICS SHOULD BE EXTERMINATED...
Susan Williams
Call me insane and still trail my posts, O damned one!...
Susan Williams
GOOD! You'll then stop attacking me for being upset that your friends
posted that all non-Catholics should be exterminated.
Susan Williams
You attack people upset about your friends posting how all
non-Catholics should be exterminated. What can I expect that you will
ever get in your future damned Crania?
Susan Williams
>"Kenna" <starb...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:c787cdb7.04101...@posting.google.com...
>> And you think she does. But I guess I'm just being a Protestant
>> Jesuit. :-)
>>
>> I don't eve3n know what one of them is really. Except some monks,
>> which makes her point even dumber. But I guess if it was'nt for the
>> Catholics susan would be a Jew hahahahahaha.
>
>
>Kenna,
>
>I do believe we have lost Susan Williams before she has even given us the
>courtesy of answering our civil questions.
Well since you also believe all non-Catholics should be exterminated,
what should I care about what you believe or see?
You call my posts insane, but know you dare not leave them!
>You asked for evidence and I
>asked for her opinion on self-defence of the Faith.
Who should answer this Jesuit when they are skilled in making sure
they don't provide answers?
>It is a pity we shall
>now remain ignorant despite the undoubted evangelical fervour of our silent
>guru.
>
>What a shame!
JESUITS HAVE NO SHAME. DON HAS NO SHAME.
>regards
>Don
>(not a Jesuit)
Jesuit Don:
HERE ARE YOUR FRIENDS POSTING TO US THAT ALL NON-CATHOLICS SHOULD
DIE...
Don
> >Have you realised, Susan, that you bear the greatest responsibility for
> >repeating, repeating, repeating the assertion that "all non-Catholics
must
> >die."
>
> I'LL KEEP SOUNDING IT TO THE HOUSETOPS TILL THOSE WHO MAKE SUCH
> STATEMENTS RECEIVE JUSTICE!
But why, Susan, do you keep saying that all non-Catholics must die?
Do you not see how hurtful this comment is to us?
regards
Don
Susan Williams
>
>"Susan Williams" <SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:4nucn0lmrn3p9ksp8...@4ax.com...
>
>> >Have you realised, Susan, that you bear the greatest responsibility for
>> >repeating, repeating, repeating the assertion that "all non-Catholics
>must
>> >die."
>>
>> I'LL KEEP SOUNDING IT TO THE HOUSETOPS TILL THOSE WHO MAKE SUCH
>> STATEMENTS RECEIVE JUSTICE!
>
>
>But why, Susan, do you keep saying that all non-Catholics must die?
Below are your friends posting it. You know I'm upset about it and
you delight in it. Yet you're a damned Vatican psychiatrist who know
everyone who loves life is wacko!
Remember you judged me as insane as all the other abandoned killers of
the Antichrist. Why ask me questions as if I'm sane?
BELOW ARE THE WORDS OF YOUR SUPER-CRIMINAL FRIENDS TELLING US ALL
NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE THAT MAKES YOU ATTACK US FOR REPORTING IT AND
BEING UPSET ABOUT IT!
>Do you not see how hurtful this comment is to us?
>
>
>regards
>Don
KILLERS SHOULD HURT! GOD WILL PUT A HURTIN' ON YOU!
HERE ARE THE WORDS OF YOUR FRIENDS THAT FORCES YOU TO ATTACK US FOR
EXPOSING THEM...
Susan Williams
>
>"Susan Williams" <SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:4nucn0lmrn3p9ksp8...@4ax.com...
>
>> >Have you realised, Susan, that you bear the greatest responsibility for
>> >repeating, repeating, repeating the assertion that "all non-Catholics
>must
>> >die."
>>
>> I'LL KEEP SOUNDING IT TO THE HOUSETOPS TILL THOSE WHO MAKE SUCH
>> STATEMENTS RECEIVE JUSTICE!
>
>
>But why, Susan, do you keep saying that all non-Catholics must die?
Below are your friends posting it. You know I'm upset about it and
you delight in it. Yet you're a damned Vatican psychiatrist who know
everyone who loves life is wacko!
Remember you judged me as insane as all the other abandoned killers of
the Antichrist. Why ask me questions as if I'm sane?
BELOW ARE THE WORDS OF YOUR SUPER-CRIMINAL FRIENDS TELLING US ALL
NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE THAT MAKES YOU ATTACK US FOR REPORTING IT AND
BEING UPSET ABOUT IT!
>Do you not see how hurtful this comment is to us?
>
>
>regards
>Don
KILLERS SHOULD HURT! GOD WILL PUT A HURTIN' ON YOU!
HERE ARE THE WORDS OF YOUR FRIENDS THAT FORCES YOU TO ATTACK US FOR
EXPOSING THEM...
Dear friends:
Kenna
You qoute Susan, "But why, Susan, do you keep saying that all
non-Catholics must die?
Do you not see how hurtful this comment is to us?".
Don I don't imagine its hurtful to just Catholics what Susan writes.
I think the Catholic, if in fact they were who did the original
posting that Suzie got all upset about, would be one of the very few
who would hold that view.
Comments that Susan make are hurtful to not only Catholics but us
protestants as well.
Stay cool Don.
Just a questio to you though Don, as an interested Aussie and assuming
you are American whom are you going to vote for. If infact you do
vote. Sorry in Australia it's mandatory to vote. Just interested to
know, oh and why?
Thanks.
Don
> You don't avoid questions, O damned one? Why did your friends post
> that all non-Catholics should be exterminated, and why have you
> defended them to date?
I, of course am not a damned one - but you, who have usurped God's judgement
and claim to possess and administer it as your own, may be. I am not going
to pass judgement for it is not my style. However, be that as it may, I have
never shrinked from intelligent questions. Nor have I ever defended your
friends when they say that "all non-Catholics must die". They are not my
firend and you would have noticed this and the fact that I have shown
disapproval of their mantra if you had not been so paranoid and adopted it
as your own. Had you not done so, then the assertion would have disappeared
11 months ago. But you couldn't and so have repeated it hundreds of times.
You have therefore been the author of hundreds of times more fanaticism and
narrow-mindedness than was shown by the original posters. I hope you're
proud of this record. I suppose when you go to your grave you will wish to
be lauded as a great defender of the faith. But in fact people just pity you
for your stupidity and intolerance.
I fail to see why you are so upset by some goon uttering such gibberish. It
happens all the time. I can't say it worries me. It doesn't. Nor does your
palpable ignorance and bigotry concern me. You are quite obviously an ill
educated ass. Your style of "belief" demonstrates this. As also does your
complete inabillity to comprehend the basis for the original posts. You are
quite unable to understand the issue about self-defence. And if you knew
anything about Christianity, which you do not, you would have realised that
your stance is utterly irrational and contradicts the basis tenets of the
Faith - among the most basic of which is to turn the other cheek. Your
ignorance is the reason why you are unable to answer the question I have put
to you several times. There is clearly no point in repeating it. I doubt
whether any illumination could ever come from you. God help your relatives
and those among whom you live.
You appear to have fingers stuck on certain keys of your keyboard which no
doubt explains your consistently replying with 38 or 39KB gibberish.
regards
Don
> remainder snipped ...
Don
Sticky-keyed troll.
Regards
Don
Kenna
I have just been to a opera done by carl orf. Called O'Fortuna. It
involves alot of Catholics lopping lots of heads off. Of course this
is 2-400 years before we all became protestants so they were loping
ther own heads off or at least our relatives. It is also the sound
tracj to Jack ass.
Do you cringe when your a protestant and the rest of the world thinks
the Pope is the head of all Christian churches?????? I used to but not
anymore, he's more impressive than the AB of Canterbury, and for the
Balcks there more chance of a Catholic Pope than a Black Arch Bishop
of Canterbury. Or would you prefer some weird arse American Baptist
KKK to represent us all.
Hey if it was'nt for Catholics we'd all be Jews (no disrespect Jew
Dudes), and less face it they are the most "relaxed" of all
conservative orthodox religions.
Hey Don & Susan,
What football team do you follow over there. I'm going to guess it
will be a gridiron team like the LA Raiders or something. We play a
similair game over here but you are not allowed to wear padding....
it's called Rugby League. Goes for 80 minutes but only 5 players are
allowed off during the whole time. And instead of having to reach 10
metres or whatever it is you get 6 tackles.
Anyway guys have a good one!!!
Kenna
Glory Glory Glasgow Celtic!!!!!!
Why do I get along with Catholics because all the one I know are the
same race as me.... CELTIC.
And I'm sure Don now Susan will all be saying the Druids will be
responsible for 911 & the Bali Bombings.
Susan Williams
HE CLAIMS ARE INSANE, WHICH ARE MY POSTS!
THE SUPER-TERRORISTS OF THE ANTICHRIST WHO CONFIRM JACK CHICK'S WORDS
ARE DESPERATE!!
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 14:33:01 +0100, "Don" <d...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>"Susan Williams" <SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:ttucn0th9t8rv9tlo...@4ax.com...
>> You don't avoid questions, O damned one? Why did your friends post
>> that all non-Catholics should be exterminated, and why have you
>> defended them to date?
>
>I, of course am not a damned one - but you, who have usurped God's judgement
>and claim to possess and administer it as your own, may be. I am not going
>to pass judgement for it is not my style.
THE BIBLE TELLS US THAT ALL LIARS AND MURDERERS ARE DAMNED!! YOU ARE
DAMNED!! You saw the posts of your friends posting how all
non-Catholics must be exterminated. I report it because I'm upset
about it. You join the other killers by making a constant attack
against me because I'm upset about it AND DON'T AGREE WITH IT AS YOU
DO! You then tell us in response to the declaration that all men die,
so it is no problem to you. All men are name-called?
You saw the posts of Shan saying that multitudes of people SHOULD BE
BURNED! and that because THEY ARE DAMNED ALREADY ANYWAY! You only
attacked me for showing it.
YOU AND YOUR MURDER CULT ARE DAMNED!!
>However, be that as it may, I have
>never shrinked from intelligent questions.
A MURDERER IS A NATURAL BORN LIAR ALSO!
>Nor have I ever defended your
>friends when they say that "all non-Catholics must die".
YOU MEAN THE PEOPLE I CONDEMN AND EXPOSE WHOM YOU HAVE YET TO SAY A
SINGLE OFF WORD ABOUT, BUT INSTEAD ATTACK ME??? How did they become
my friends other than another damned super-monster as they are (you)
have so declared?
>They are not my
>firend and you would have noticed this and the fact that I have shown
>disapproval of their mantra if you had not been so paranoid and adopted it
>as your own.
Your constant trailing of my posts after calling me insane for being
upset about the death mandates is the typical lie of you submonsters.
Show the posts where you have condemned your fellow super-terrorists!
Show your posts that expounded upon their words of malice and hate!
>Had you not done so, then the assertion would have disappeared
>11 months ago. But you couldn't and so have repeated it hundreds of times.
THAT I AM INSANE and that ALL MEN DIE, so their comments are no
problem, is what you have stated!
>You have therefore been the author of hundreds of times more fanaticism and
>narrow-mindedness than was shown by the original posters.
BUT DAMNED SERVANT OF SATAN:... I STILL DON'T BELIEVE THAT ALL
NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE! NEITHER WILL I ATTACK SOMEONE CONSTANTLY AS
YOU DO WHO OBJECT TO OTHERS POSTING THIS AS THEY REPRESENT ROME AS YOU
DO!
>I hope you're
>proud of this record.
DON'T LISTEN TO THE DAMNED LIARS OF THE ANTICHRIST TELLING ME WHAT
RECORDS IS SHOW! Already asked you to go before Homeland Security and
tell them as the result of 911, THAT ALL MEN DIE, as you told me is
the result of your killer super-terrorists posting that all
non-Catholics should die!
>I suppose when you go to your grave you will wish to
>be lauded as a great defender of the faith. But in fact people just pity you
>for your stupidity and intolerance.
BUT I STILL DON'T BELIEVE THAT ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE, AND THAT IN
RESPONSE TO PEOPLE POSTING THAT I MUST UNDERSTAND THAT ALL MEN DIE AS
YOU HAVE POSTED! I will keep attacking the people who posted this as
you will keep attacking me for being upset about it.
Direct us to your posts of condemnation on the scale:
Me who opposed the motion, AND YOUR SUPER-TERRORISTS FRIENDS WHO
POSTED THAT ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE!
THE BIBLE DAMNS YOU O DAMNED KILLER!
I did not post that ANYONE MUST DIE! Your friends did and you attack
me for being upset about it!
>I fail to see why you are so upset by some goon uttering such gibberish.
CHECK THE GOOGLE ARCHIVES OF UPSET RESPONSES BY SUPER-TERRORIST DON
AGAINST THE PEOPLE WHO POSTED THAT ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE,
COMPARED TO HIS JESUIT PARANOID OBSESSION CONDEMNING MY POSTS AFTER HE
ALREADY TOLD ME I'M INSANE!
The unscrupulous monster now tells me that if someone posts
"gibberish" referring to his killer friends posting all non-Catholics
must die, I should not be upset. I he upset about something?
>It
>happens all the time. I can't say it worries me. It doesn't.
People upset that others post how billions of people must die HAPPENS
ALL THE TIME?
Look at all the responses of this damned killer in attacking me and
denying his condemned soul sleep!
The unscrupulous demon has to lie some more, so, despite all the
attacks and constant trailing of my posts in obedience to the Jesuit
Oath, what likely more lie is he going to utter?....
>Nor does your
>palpable ignorance and bigotry concern me. You are quite obviously an ill
>educated ass.
WHERE'S THE LOVE, DAMNED KILLER? Why am I so important that you trail
my posts and then just can't help disobeying your own posts begging me
to have love? When I revealed that your friends are super-terrorist
killers for posting all non-Catholics must die, YOU ASKED ME WHERE'S
THE LOVE!
How is it I'm able to cause an unscrupulous Jesuit to AGAIN void out
his principles in his desperate trailing of my posts?
>Your style of "belief" demonstrates this.
I STILL BELIEVE ALL NON-CATHOLICS SHOULD LIVE AND THAT IF SOMEONE POST
THEY SHOULD DIE, I WILL USE MY ENERGIES AGAINST HIM AND NOT AGAINST
THOSE UPSET ABOUT IT AS YOU AND THE VATICAN ARMY HAVE CONSISTENTLY
DONE OVER THE INTERNET!!
Of course I'm very stupid to you to the point where you can't go home
nor rest when I post what you call is insanity! PARANOID DAMNED
JESUIT!
>As also does your
>complete inabillity to comprehend the basis for the original posts.
Can you understand damned Jesuit that you called my posts insane? Can
you understand that insane posts are not to command your heated
Satanic energies in trailing my posts?
I STILL BELIEVE ALL NON-CATHOLICS SHOULD LIVE AND THAT IF SOMEONE POST
THEY SHOULD DIE, I WILL USE MY ENERGIES AGAINST HIM AND NOT AGAINST
THOSE UPSET ABOUT IT AS YOU AND THE VATICAN ARMY HAVE CONSISTENTLY
DONE OVER THE INTERNET!!
Of course I'm very stupid to you to the point where you can't go home
nor rest when I post what you call is insanity! PARANOID DAMNED
JESUIT!
>You are
>quite unable to understand the issue about self-defence.
Here's one reason why in constrast with you and every other
super-damned super-terrorist of the Vatican...
I STILL BELIEVE ALL NON-CATHOLICS SHOULD LIVE AND THAT IF SOMEONE POST
THEY SHOULD DIE, I WILL USE MY ENERGIES AGAINST HIM AND NOT AGAINST
THOSE UPSET ABOUT IT AS YOU AND THE VATICAN ARMY HAVE CONSISTENTLY
DONE OVER THE INTERNET!!
Of course I'm very stupid to you to the point where you can't go home
nor rest when I post what you call is insanity! PARANOID DAMNED
JESUIT!
>And if you knew
>anything about Christianity, which you do not, you would have realised that
>your stance is utterly irrational and contradicts the basis tenets of the
>Faith - among the most basic of which is to turn the other cheek.
Your friends posted that all non-Catholics must die without yet a word
of condemnation against their WORDS!
Here's why I think irrationally to someone as satanic as you...
I STILL BELIEVE ALL NON-CATHOLICS SHOULD LIVE AND THAT IF SOMEONE POST
THEY SHOULD DIE, I WILL USE MY ENERGIES AGAINST HIM AND NOT AGAINST
THOSE UPSET ABOUT IT AS YOU AND THE VATICAN ARMY HAVE CONSISTENTLY
DONE OVER THE INTERNET!!
Of course I'm very stupid to you to the point where you can't go home
nor rest when I post what you call is insanity! PARANOID DAMNED
JESUIT!
>Your
>ignorance is the reason why you are unable to answer the question I have put
>to you several times.
What relevant question?
>There is clearly no point in repeating it.
Since you're a damned Jesuit, I still don't believe all non-Catholics
must die, and you never had a rational question except to evade from
the point!
>I doubt
>whether any illumination could ever come from you.
Naturally, you believe all non-Catholics should be exterminated! I
haven't yet burned neither into you nor the other damned killers that
insane posts, as you call mine, should not be constantly trailed at
the expense of your viperous children and homelife!
>God help your relatives
>and those among whom you live.
What, they believe all non-Catholics should be exterminated as you do
damned Jesuit?
>You appear to have fingers stuck on certain keys of your keyboard which no
>doubt explains your consistently replying with 38 or 39KB gibberish.
What does the google archives reveal of your Paranoid Jesuit obsession
with such posts as you lyingly delineate?
DAMNED ONE, PLEASE LISTEN SINCE YOUR COMPLETE PAST RACE DIDN'T...
I STILL BELIEVE ALL NON-CATHOLICS SHOULD LIVE AND THAT IF SOMEONE POST
THEY SHOULD DIE, I WILL USE MY ENERGIES AGAINST HIM AND NOT AGAINST
THOSE UPSET ABOUT IT AS YOU AND THE VATICAN ARMY HAVE CONSISTENTLY
DONE OVER THE INTERNET!!
Of course I'm very stupid to you to the point where you can't go home
nor rest when I post what you call is insanity! PARANOID DAMNED
JESUIT!
In His Grace,
Susan
Susan Williams
WHERE'S THE LOVE YOU TOLD ME ABOUT WHEN I OBJECTED TO YOUR FRIENDS
POSTING THAT ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE, O DAMNED ONE?
Read the Revelation and then explain to me why the bible damns liars
and killers, leaving you, representing the Vatican, OUT OF LUCK!
THE SUPER-DAMNED KILLER OF THE ANTICHRIST IS STILL LINGERING ON POSTS
HE CLAIMS ARE INSANE, WHICH ARE MY POSTS!
THE SUPER-TERRORISTS OF THE ANTICHRIST WHO CONFIRM JACK CHICK'S WORDS
ARE DESPERATE!!
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 14:33:01 +0100, "Don" <d...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>"Susan Williams" <SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
Susan Williams
>Suzie Q,
Where's the love? O Jesuit!
Let me show the world why you demons attack me constantly in your
Jesuit paranoic obsession!...
DURING OUR CURRENT CLIMATE OF 911!
Other killers attack us no end because we are exposing this!
Don
If you read your bible, which you clearly don't, you would realise that the
whole cosmos is condemned as a result of the Fall (which for the avoidance
of doubt doesn't mean Autumn in this context). Thus no person can be the
author of their own salvation. That means that all men (and women and
children) Catholic and non-Catholic alike start from the standpoint of
condemnation and are redeemed only through God's good grace appropriated in
faith.
If you read your bible, you would also know that those who usurp the power
of God have committed the sin of blasphemy. That has a particular
condemnation within Christianity. In Revelation it is referred to as the sin
against the Holy Spirit. So it is obvious that you, who go around damning
specific individuals, including myself, have a great deal of repentance to
do before you stand any chance of redemption.
I am wholly un-concerned about your empty threats since I am utterly at ease
about my spiritual health. But you, should be very worried indeed. I am not
surprised to see that you are fretting about some stupid comment that your
friends wrote that you repeat at every possible opportunity. It is all part
of your spiritual malaise. But I think you should resume taking your tablets
as that will surely help.
regards
Don
an0...@hotmail.com
<SWilliams...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>THE SUPER-DAMNED KILLER OF THE ANTICHRIST IS STILL LINGERING ON POSTS
>HE CLAIMS ARE INSANE, WHICH ARE MY POSTS!
>
>THE SUPER-TERRORISTS OF THE ANTICHRIST WHO CONFIRM JACK CHICK'S WORDS
>ARE DESPERATE!!
Ding dong!
Susan Williams
Sorry, but just like in eternity, I can't let you super-terrorists get
rest!
Here are your friends who posted that BILLIONS OF PEOPLE (all
non-Catholics) MUST DIE!...
DURING OUR CURRENT CLIMATE OF 911!
Other killers attack us no end because we are exposing this!
Don
<an0...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4897o0d04vcc9bngr...@4ax.com...
> Ding dong!
I concur.
regards
Don
Susan Williams
DURING OUR CURRENT CLIMATE OF 911!
Other killers attack us no end because we are exposing this!