Your selective ranting has avoided answering my question about how far you think Christians should go in defence of the Faith? For that was Geloso's point. Do you not have a point of view to offer? Go on, enlighten me!
> I will always get mad if anyone says all non-Catholics must die.
Yes, you have demonstrated this capably. But do you not think that it would be better to direct your wrath against those who assert such a monstrous thing rather than denounce me and all Catholics? Have you not fallen into the trap that was so easily laid out for you, namely, that you have broadcast your hateful anti-Catholic biggotry to the world? Do you really think that biggotry is an appropriate response for someone who claims to be a child of the one loving saviour? Did Jesus not turn his other cheek? While you ... only hate and want to obliterate all those nasty Catholics? How about winning us all round by the power of argument and a demonstration of God's love? Christlike?
> >When did you first realise that you spoke for God in damning people who did > >not agree with you?
> As soon as they did not agree that all non-Catholics should live! > Does God agree with you that all non-Catholics must die? He is not > going to damn you?? The bible says HE WILL!
I don't think the bible has much to say about Catholics qua Catholics, or Protestants qua Protestants for that matter. You, like your sixteenth century protestant forebears, have usurped the authority of God and decided on your own initiative to damn all Catholics yourself. Naughty, naughty, Susan. Could you not wait until judgement day and let God do his own judging? Is he so impotent in your eyes that he can't do his own judging? And doesn't the bible say something about people not judging others? Or do your sort not value the bible these days? Surely you should pay some lip-service to what you claim to believe so strongly? Or is being full of hate and biggotry really the right way to serve the loving God?
> >Do you think your response to me has been respectful and kind? > Do you think people telling us all non-Catholics must die is kind?
The insurmountable problem for you, Susan, is that you are as guilty as I am of believing that all non-Catholics should die. That is because neither of us believes it or has asserted it (other than that I observed lightheartedly that all men are mortal). You are such a biggot, so eaten up with irrational hate, that you are totally blind to the fact. You could have had me as an ally but instead you just lash out blindly. You are like a toddler having a tantrum.
> YOU ARE DAMNED! YOU WILL DRINK EVERY DROP OF THE BLOOD YOU SPILL > DOUBLE!
Thank you for those loving words, Susan. I am sure your saviour will be proud of you. What a marvelous example you are for your professed faith to be sure. And everyone can see it.
> Why do you imagine I'm a persecutor and full of hate that keeps you up > at nights because I will still be upset at your friends posting that > all non-Catholics must die?
They are your friends that say this, not mine. They write to you, not me. I do not know them, you do. But I do agree that you are full of hate as you suggest. Strange that from a professed Christian. I take it you are a Christian aren't you? Or are you just trolling for fun like your friends?
Your quotation from "Shan" is very illuminating. His/her style, both emotional and typographic (use of upper case, etc.), is so similar to yours. Are you sure you, or one of your paranoid alter egos, didn't write all this stuff to stimulate sympathy or to make you look good among lurkers in this NG? How many free dinners have you obtained out of your righteous campaign to destroy Catholicism? But again the disgusting perverted stuff that you repeat so triumphantly seems rather too florid to be your own unaided work.
Has it not occurred to you, Susan, that the people you condemn as beastly Catholics, might actually just be atheistic jerks who are having fun at your expense? Are you not, in the final analysis, just too easy to wind up? Wouldn't you not be better just getting down on your knees and praying for forgiveness?
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004 16:26:34 +0100, "Don" <d...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >"Susan Williams" <SWilliams0717196...@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:lhmfm0plieflprng0485abv9prknkask4a@4ax.com... >> ... [snipped the usual paranoid rant] ...
>Your selective ranting has avoided answering my question about how far you >think Christians should go in defence of the Faith?
How far should Christians teach the world that if someone posts all non-Catholics must die, we must be upset about this?
>For that was Geloso's >point. Do you not have a point of view to offer? Go on, enlighten me!
Ted Seeber and Teresita told us that all non-Catholics must die. This killer here concludes with the others that because I'm upset about it, I'm hate, I'm a this and that and have yet to say a single off word about the people who posted this.
What then would be his consistent judgments as documented by the Jack Chick website: http://www.chick.com?
Susan:
>> I will always get mad if anyone says all non-Catholics must die.
>Yes, you have demonstrated this capably. But do you not think that it would >be better to direct your wrath against those who assert such a monstrous >thing rather than denounce me and all Catholics?
Because they didn't receive the wrath of Don for this, but Don knows where hatred is in those only who are upset about it?
Do you think it would be likely that if the Jesuits are deadly and unscrupulous as documented, they would conclude that I have denounced all Catholics, including my own family members because I'm upset at people who posted all non-Catholics must die and joins Don in only exclusively attacking those upset about this?
>Have you not fallen into >the trap that was so easily laid out for you,
Disagreeing with these damned Jesuit crusaders for free thought?
>namely, that you have >broadcast your hateful anti-Catholic biggotry to the world?
Below is his friends posting how all non-Catholics must die. On the historic Protestant websites and the Jack Chick website is documented HOW ROME DOESN'T CHANGE.
>Do you really >think that biggotry is an appropriate response for someone who claims to be >a child of the one loving saviour?
Because I'm upset your friends posted that all non-Catholics must die and you believe the same thing, Jesuit?
>Did Jesus not turn his other cheek?
SO WE SHOULD NOT HAVE PRE-EMPTIVELY ATTACKED IRAQ?
>While >you ... only hate and want to obliterate all those nasty Catholics?
SHOW WHERE I WROTE ALL CATHOLIC MUST DIE, AND I WILL SHOW YOU BELOW YOUR FRIENDS POSTING ALL NON-CATHOLIC MUST DIE, and it will not bother you because you agree with them.
>How >about winning us all round by the power of argument and a demonstration of >God's love? Christlike?
Let me try even to protect my life first from you unscrupulous and damned race of killers by announcing to the world the statements against the lives of all non-Catholics and then the blasphemous attempts to smother out the warnings as shown here.
>> >When did you first realise that you spoke for God in damning people who >did >> >not agree with you?
>> As soon as they did not agree that all non-Catholics should live! >> Does God agree with you that all non-Catholics must die? He is not >> going to damn you?? The bible says HE WILL!
>I don't think the bible has much to say about Catholics qua Catholics, or >Protestants qua Protestants for that matter.
I don't think the bible has much to say about exposing Catholics telling us all on the newsgroups how all non-Catholics must die. Obviously me exposing this bothers you immensely.
>ou, like your sixteenth >century protestant forebears, have usurped the authority of God and decided >on your own initiative to damn all Catholics yourself.
SHOW WHERE WE POSTED ALL CATHOLICS MUST DIE AND I'LL SHOW YOU BELOW WHERE YOUR FRIENDS POSTED ALL NON-CATHOLIC MUST DIE THAT YOU WELL SAW!
>Naughty, naughty,
You mean me still refusing to believe that all non-Catholics must die, and that because I expose your friends posting this, I am hate?
>Susan.
Yes, super-terrorist Jesuit killer?
>Could you not wait until judgement day and let God do his own >judging?
Let me try and alert others first about billions of people called non-Catholics whom your friends have posted should be extermnated. Do you mind? TOO BAD!
>Is he so impotent in your eyes that he can't do his own judging?
Who then is gonna take care of "HATEFUL" Susan for her being upset that your friends posted how all non-Catholics must die?
>And doesn't the bible say something about people not judging others?
Why doesn't it bother you that all non-Catholics have been judged and condemned to die? I then am upset with the people on the newsgroups who told us they must die who are fewer in number, and you blaspheme the name of Christ to tell us he is as stupid as you think we are!
>Or do >your sort not value the bible these days?
That all non-Catholics must die as your friends posted? Or that those who are upset about this should be attacked by blasphemous lies and accusations of hatred? SHOW ME!
>Surely you should pay some >lip-service to what you claim to believe so strongly?
Like the right to disagree?
>Or is being full of >hate and biggotry really the right way to serve the loving God?
How then can I convince you that all non-Catholics must live and stop you from exclusively attacking people upset about your friends posting how they all must die?
>> >Do you think your response to me has been respectful and kind?
We make pre-emptive attacks against people who believe Americans must die because they made Arabs angry? What about others who believe much more must die JUST BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT CATHOLIC?
>> Do you think people telling us all non-Catholics must die is kind?
>The insurmountable problem for you, Susan, is that you are as guilty as I am >of believing that all non-Catholics should die.
Readers, GO BY THE ACTIONS AND NOT BY THE LIPS OF THE JESUITS! Too much history of their capabilities. I am obviously upset about something, and this super-terrorist criminal is upset about another!
>That is because neither of >us believes it or has asserted it (other than that I observed lightheartedly >that all men are mortal).
ACTIONS TELL OVER THE LIES OF THE JESUITS! Manhours and time expended in condemning two different things here! With hateful accusations of insanity and malice these new fangled psychiatrists know they cannot leave "insane" posts.
>You are such a biggot,
Thank you O damned one! I have to do something right in life!
Why just because I believe all non-Catholics should live?
>so eaten up with irrational >hate,
Because your friends posted how all non-Catholics must die and you are absorbed in trying to stop me from exposing hatred?
>that you are totally blind to the fact.
That I should only attack people who are upset about your friends posting how all non-Catholics must die?...
>You could have had me as an >ally but instead you just lash out blindly. You are like a toddler having a >tantrum.
Someone is getting very upset here, Jesuit! I STILL DON'T BELIEVE ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE DESPITE YOUR GOEBBELS TANTRUMS, YOUR BLASPHEMY AND YOUR INCREDIBLE ABILITY TO LIE!
>> YOU ARE DAMNED! YOU WILL DRINK EVERY DROP OF THE BLOOD YOU SPILL >> DOUBLE!
>Thank you for those loving words, Susan.
Like your friends posting how all non-Catholics must die?
What about these words that will be deemed hateful to you Jesuits...
Revelation 22:14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city. 15 For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and MURDERERS, and idolaters, and WHOSOEVER LOVETH AND MAKETH A LIE!
>I am sure your saviour will be >proud of you.
I flew planes into Afghanistan to show love?
>What a marvelous example you are for your professed faith to >be sure. And everyone can see it.
That we should be upset at people exposing your friends posting how all non-Catholics must die?
>> Why do you imagine I'm a persecutor and full of hate that keeps you up >> at nights because I will still be upset at your friends posting that >> all non-Catholics must die?
>They are your friends that say this, not mine.
I oppose those people just like I oppose you, and they give the same tactics and responses. How can they be my friends when they condemned even my life and not yours?
>They write to you, not me.
THEY POSTED THAT ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE. YOU ARE UPSET BECAUSE I OPPOSED THEM FOR THIS.
>I do not know them, you do.
Even though you agree with them that all non-Catholics must die show by your exclusive and undying opposition to those who report about this?
>But I do agree that you are full of hate as you >suggest.
But I do agree that it is only Jesuits who would publish that someone is full of hate for exposing your race and cult publishing that all non-Catholics must die!
They don't represent Rome? You do? What are you gonna do about their postings as you are showing us now?
>Strange that from a professed Christian. I take it you are a >Christian aren't you?
You mean that I am upset at your friends posting how all non-Catholics must die? That's strange to a Jesuit?
>Or are you just trolling for fun like your friends?
You mean because I don't think all non-Catholics must die like you do shown by your actions?
>Your quotation from "Shan" is very illuminating.
You're a Jesuit! You can't be upset at Shan for condemning the lives of millions!
>His/her style, both >emotional and typographic (use of upper case, etc.), is so similar to yours.
Your ignoring of the death mandates posted against all non-Catholics is so similar to the documentaton given to us about the Jesuits on Jack Chick's website...
Can you not get a place in a suitable institution? I am sure that you would amply qualify for help.
> That all non-Catholics must die as your friends posted?
You know perfectly well that you are the only person who has corresponded with them. Ergo they are your "friends", not mine.
> Thank you O damned one! I have to do something right in life!
Why have you "damned" me when I have not agreed with your hypothesis that all non-Catholics should die? You know that I have never agreed with this hypothesis. Why don't you read your bible and learn what love is. Clue: it isn't hate.
You are completely insane. For all our sakes, please go and see a doctor before you do something serious. That is the thing in life you can do right as you suggest.
>Can you not get a place in a suitable institution? I am sure that you would >amply qualify for help.
Why not give me the list of any institution that will incarcerate me for believing all non-Catholics should live and for not knowing there's no problem with 911 because all men die anyway!
You should find at least some back at your Vatican.
>> That all non-Catholics must die as your friends posted?
>You know perfectly well that you are the only person who has corresponded >with them. Ergo they are your "friends", not mine.
They called me crazy also for believing all non-Catholics should live. But then you approached because I didn't like the motion.
They think like you. They are your friends.
>> Thank you O damned one! I have to do something right in life!
>Why have you "damned" me when I have not agreed with your hypothesis that >all non-Catholics should die?
BECAUSE YOU AGREE THAT ALL NON-CATHOLIC SHOULD DIE! You are a Jesuit. You only attack those upset about your friends posting this, but you can lie breathlessly like your friends.
Some posted that all non-Catholics must die. I'm upset about it. You join the whole super-terrorist band to attack me only and cannot stop.
YOU BELIEVE ALL NON-CATHOLIC SHOULD DIE! EUREKA!!
I even show you the posts where they said that, and you attack only me as hateful for showing it.
>You know that I have never agreed with this >hypothesis.
Yes I know you agree with it fully just like all the others even posting it.
>Why don't you read your bible and learn what love is. Clue: it >isn't hate.
Good. But then why is love to you the idea that all non-Catholics must die?
>You are completely insane.
Why am I insane for believing all non-Catholics must die, and why am I insane enough to know that I have asked you and your other sub-animal friends this question hundreds of times but your brand of psychiatry board is always stunned at this new discovery question.
That includes the question of why you dumb and damned super-crimiinals keep glued ot insane posts, except you leave the whole sea of insane posts on the internet alone but mine?
>For all our sakes, please go and see a doctor >before you do something serious.
AGAIN O DAMNED ONE...
SHOW ME THE LIST OF DOCTORS WHO THINK I AM SICK BECAUSE I'M UPSET THAT YOUR FRIENDS POSTED THAT ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE!
I will take that list to the airwaves and shut the Vatican DOWN!
>That is the thing in life you can do right >as you suggest.
>regards >Don
LOOK AT THESE WORDS DAMNED DON...
Here is the story that has the super-criminals of the Pope hanging around our posts. Why do we keep talking about 911 more than 3 years after?
People posted that all non-Catholics must die. We were uspet about it. Suddenly, as told us by Jack Chick, we have strange people from different denominations attacking us ONLY and for years have refused to say one bad word against those who did this.
Lest you forget the issue or evidence, here it is...
===========
Here's the bold death mandate against all non-Catholics this abandoned despot ignores constantly to this day...
============
These Jesuits created a post entitled, "In Defense of the Church Wiping Out Heretics!" You can find that thread here:
In response to this, since they violate all their lying tirades against making attacks and accusations to attack us as hateful, we responded with another thread entitled, "IN DEFENSE OF THE CHURCH WIPING OUR HER NEIGHBOURS"
The thread was expounding upon the Parable of the Good Samaritan where Christ shows how those not of our religion should be treated contrary to the mandates of Rome!
A man by the name of Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholic life when with approval he told us that:
"NONE of the groups persecuted by the Catholics were living the Bible. They were living their personal interpretations of God, not the Bible"
Brother Ted revealed that this was done just after the 911 attacks when America was assessing what a terrorist was with respect to human life. Prime Minister Tony Blair, a short time after the 911 attacks gave the world a definition of terrorists by telling us they are people who have a marked disrespect for human life. Since Seeber told us with approval that Rome persecuted non-Catholics because they did not live the bible, how many of the victims of 911 live the bible? Did Seeber give condolences to the victims of 911 after the attacks? If so, why? Did he mean it?
Because of the revelation, Ted Seeber had to make an excuse and leave. He left his website up, but his pictures and other things appeared to have disappeared from it.
Soon, another killer super-terrorist became insensed at what was done to Ted Seeber. He then moved out to attack me as I was showing how Seeber confirmed THAT ROME HADN'T CHANGED. She still has mass-exterminations as part of her agenda, practice and habits. To accomplish this she has demons in human form trained to storm all free media and teach people how they must understand that people will disagree.
That killer refashioned his name after mine in the reverse and called himself "William Suzanne." The man then entered with the boldest of lies, much like John Ashcroft telling us the Patriot Act is Constitutional!
He comes in telling us that SEEBER DOESN'T SPEAK FOR (or represent) Rome in his condemnation of all non-Catholics.
I had to ask the super-terrorist more than once why then he wasn't upset with Seeber for MISREPRESENTING Rome. Jesuits are all over the newsgroups ranting and raging claim that we MISrepresent Rome. Will Suzanne now tells us Seeber doesn’t represent Rome! He was asked to give an answer for why he is not upset with Seeber. As usual, the super-terrorist then moved into an unbridled attack against the Adventist Church LEAVING THE QUESTION COMPLETELY UNTOUCHED!!
Now some of you may well not be convinced that Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholics on the newsgroups. Actually, to this day, even those on the newsgroups who formerly denied it had to confess that Seeber did just that, and they went into every manner of defense for Seeber. As we expose the dialogues, we will more prove this. However, since we started this work, another person came out more boldly and gave approval of the deaths of millions of Christians. She posts under the name of Teresita. When I made mention of that great Christian work Foxe’s Book of Martyrs, detailing centuries of uncountable murders of bible-believing Christians, she referred to the work as:
Naturally, we got on her case for her boldness here as we still have the liberty to do in this free country.
Teresita in response lied to us, telling us that when she called Foxe's Book of Martyrs "Foxe's Book of Heretics," she was only referring to the Albigenses of the Protestant Reformation 5/29/2003 who were a minority group of Christians during that time: <http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bb521t01p...>
How do we know she was lying? The Albigenses were hardly mentioned in that massive work. Protestants usually have little to say about the Albigenses BECAUSE BOTH THEMSELVES AND ALL THEIR WORKS WERE COMPLETELY ANNIHILATED BY ROME! But more proof that she was lying comes in her next response as she worked to divert from my advancing questions:
When pressed further and further to reveal her beliefs she is trained to hide on the matter of the value of human life, Teresita says the Vatican merely carried out God's commands when they killed millions of Christians because the Israelites did the same with their enemies. Here she is freely admitting what all those “Anti-Catholics” and “Catholic-haters” have been saying all along:
>>> Who then is gonna take care of "HATEFUL" Susan
>>Can you not get a place in a suitable institution? I am sure that you would >>amply qualify for help.
>Why not give me the list of any institution that will incarcerate me >for believing all non-Catholics should live and for not knowing >there's no problem with 911 because all men die anyway!
>You should find at least some back at your Vatican.
>>> That all non-Catholics must die as your friends posted?
>>You know perfectly well that you are the only person who has corresponded >>with them. Ergo they are your "friends", not mine.
>They called me crazy also for believing all non-Catholics should live. >But then you approached because I didn't like the motion.
>They think like you. They are your friends.
>>> Thank you O damned one! I have to do something right in life!
>>Why have you "damned" me when I have not agreed with your hypothesis that >>all non-Catholics should die?
>BECAUSE YOU AGREE THAT ALL NON-CATHOLIC SHOULD DIE! You are a >Jesuit. You only attack those upset about your friends posting this, >but you can lie breathlessly like your friends.
>Some posted that all non-Catholics must die. I'm upset about it. You >join the whole super-terrorist band to attack me only and cannot stop.
>YOU BELIEVE ALL NON-CATHOLIC SHOULD DIE! EUREKA!!
>I even show you the posts where they said that, and you attack only me >as hateful for showing it.
>>You know that I have never agreed with this >>hypothesis.
>Yes I know you agree with it fully just like all the others even >posting it.
>>Why don't you read your bible and learn what love is. Clue: it >>isn't hate.
>Good. But then why is love to you the idea that all non-Catholics >must die?
>>You are completely insane.
>Why am I insane for believing all non-Catholics must die,
>and why am I >insane enough to know that I have asked you and your other sub-animal >friends this question hundreds of times but your brand of psychiatry >board is always stunned at this new discovery question.
>That includes the question of why you dumb and damned super-crimiinals >keep glued ot insane posts, except you leave the whole sea of insane >posts on the internet alone but mine?
>>For all our sakes, please go and see a doctor >>before you do something serious.
>AGAIN O DAMNED ONE...
>SHOW ME THE LIST OF DOCTORS WHO THINK I AM SICK BECAUSE I'M UPSET THAT >YOUR FRIENDS POSTED THAT ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE!
>I will take that list to the airwaves and shut the Vatican DOWN!
>>That is the thing in life you can do right >>as you suggest.
>>regards >>Don
>LOOK AT THESE WORDS DAMNED DON...
>Here is the story that has the super-criminals of the Pope hanging >around our posts. Why do we keep talking about 911 more than 3 years >after?
>People posted that all non-Catholics must die. We were uspet about >it. Suddenly, as told us by Jack Chick, we have strange people from >different denominations attacking us ONLY and for years have refused >to say one bad word against those who did this.
>Lest you forget the issue or evidence, here it is...
>===========
>Here's the bold death mandate against all non-Catholics this abandoned >despot ignores constantly to this day...
>============
>These Jesuits created a post entitled, "In Defense of the Church >Wiping Out Heretics!" You can find that thread here:
>In response to this, since they violate all their lying tirades >against making attacks and accusations to attack us as hateful, we >responded with another thread entitled, "IN DEFENSE OF THE CHURCH >WIPING OUR HER NEIGHBOURS"
>The thread was expounding upon the Parable of the Good Samaritan where >Christ shows how those not of our religion should be treated contrary >to the mandates of Rome!
>A man by the name of Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholic life when >with approval he told us that:
>"NONE of the groups persecuted by the Catholics were living the Bible. >They were living their personal interpretations of God, not the Bible"
>Brother Ted revealed that this was done just after the 911 attacks >when America was assessing what a terrorist was with respect to human >life. Prime Minister Tony Blair, a short time after the 911 attacks >gave the world a definition of terrorists by telling us they are >people who have a marked disrespect for human life. Since Seeber >told us with approval that Rome persecuted non-Catholics because they >did not live the bible, how many of the victims of 911 live the bible? >Did Seeber give condolences to the victims of 911 after the attacks? >If so, why? Did he mean it?
>Because of the revelation, Ted Seeber had to make an excuse and leave. >He left his website up, but his pictures and other things appeared to >have disappeared from it.
>Soon, another killer super-terrorist became insensed at what was done >to Ted Seeber. He then moved out to attack me as I was showing how >Seeber confirmed THAT ROME HADN'T CHANGED. She still has >mass-exterminations as part of her agenda, practice and habits. To >accomplish this she has demons in human form trained to storm all free >media and teach people how they must understand that people will >disagree.
>That killer refashioned his name after mine in the reverse and called >himself "William Suzanne." The man then entered with the boldest of >lies, much like John Ashcroft telling us the Patriot Act is >Constitutional!
>He comes in telling us that SEEBER DOESN'T SPEAK FOR (or represent) >Rome in his condemnation of all non-Catholics.
>I had to ask the super-terrorist more than once why then he wasn't >upset with Seeber for MISREPRESENTING Rome. Jesuits are all over the >newsgroups ranting and raging claim that we MISrepresent Rome. Will >Suzanne now tells us Seeber doesn’t represent Rome! He was asked to >give an answer for why he is not upset with Seeber. As usual, the >super-terrorist then moved into an unbridled attack against the >Adventist Church LEAVING THE QUESTION COMPLETELY UNTOUCHED!!
>Now some of you may well not be convinced that Ted Seeber condemned >all non-Catholics on the newsgroups. Actually, to this day, even >those on the newsgroups who formerly denied it had to confess that >Seeber did just that, and they went into every manner of defense for >Seeber. As we expose the dialogues, we will more prove this. >However, since we started this work, another person came out more >boldly and gave approval of the deaths of millions of Christians. She >posts under the name of Teresita. When I made mention of that great >Christian work Foxe’s Book of Martyrs, detailing centuries of >uncountable murders of bible-believing Christians, she referred to the >work as:
>Naturally, we got on her case for her boldness here as we still have >the liberty to do in this free country.
>Teresita in response lied to us, telling us that when she called >Foxe's Book of Martyrs "Foxe's Book of Heretics," she was only >referring to the Albigenses of the Protestant Reformation 5/29/2003 >who were a minority group of Christians during that time: ><http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bb521t01p...>
>How do we know she was lying? The Albigenses were hardly mentioned in >that massive work. Protestants usually have little to say about the >Albigenses BECAUSE BOTH THEMSELVES AND ALL THEIR WORKS WERE COMPLETELY >ANNIHILATED BY ROME! But more proof that she was lying comes in her >next response as she worked to divert from my advancing questions:
>When pressed further and further to reveal her beliefs she is trained >to hide on the matter of the value of human life, Teresita says the >Vatican merely carried out God's commands when they killed millions of >Christians because the Israelites did the same with their enemies. >Here she is freely admitting what all those “Anti-Catholics” and >“Catholic-haters” have been saying all
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 14:24:32 -0500, an00...@hotmail.com wrote: >On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 14:14:44 -0500, Susan Williams ><SWilliams0717196...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Hey Susie!
>How about them "Jews"??
>Where do they stand..?
Are they non-Catholics? Have I been saying, unlike you, that all non-Catholics should live?
We "insane" non-Jesuits have to help you killers!
Here are some words again. Go through them and expound to us what they say and mean, super-terrorist!...
Here is the story that has the super-criminals of the Pope hanging around our posts. Why do we keep talking about 911 more than 3 years after?
People posted that all non-Catholics must die. We were uspet about it. Suddenly, as told us by Jack Chick, we have strange people from different denominations attacking us ONLY and for years have refused to say one bad word against those who did this.
Lest you forget the issue or evidence, here it is...
===========
Here's the bold death mandate against all non-Catholics this abandoned despot ignores constantly to this day...
============
These Jesuits created a post entitled, "In Defense of the Church Wiping Out Heretics!" You can find that thread here:
In response to this, since they violate all their lying tirades against making attacks and accusations to attack us as hateful, we responded with another thread entitled, "IN DEFENSE OF THE CHURCH WIPING OUR HER NEIGHBOURS"
The thread was expounding upon the Parable of the Good Samaritan where Christ shows how those not of our religion should be treated contrary to the mandates of Rome!
A man by the name of Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholic life when with approval he told us that:
"NONE of the groups persecuted by the Catholics were living the Bible. They were living their personal interpretations of God, not the Bible"
Brother Ted revealed that this was done just after the 911 attacks when America was assessing what a terrorist was with respect to human life. Prime Minister Tony Blair, a short time after the 911 attacks gave the world a definition of terrorists by telling us they are people who have a marked disrespect for human life. Since Seeber told us with approval that Rome persecuted non-Catholics because they did not live the bible, how many of the victims of 911 live the bible? Did Seeber give condolences to the victims of 911 after the attacks? If so, why? Did he mean it?
Because of the revelation, Ted Seeber had to make an excuse and leave. He left his website up, but his pictures and other things appeared to have disappeared from it.
Soon, another killer super-terrorist became insensed at what was done to Ted Seeber. He then moved out to attack me as I was showing how Seeber confirmed THAT ROME HADN'T CHANGED. She still has mass-exterminations as part of her agenda, practice and habits. To accomplish this she has demons in human form trained to storm all free media and teach people how they must understand that people will disagree.
That killer refashioned his name after mine in the reverse and called himself "William Suzanne." The man then entered with the boldest of lies, much like John Ashcroft telling us the Patriot Act is Constitutional!
He comes in telling us that SEEBER DOESN'T SPEAK FOR (or represent) Rome in his condemnation of all non-Catholics.
I had to ask the super-terrorist more than once why then he wasn't upset with Seeber for MISREPRESENTING Rome. Jesuits are all over the newsgroups ranting and raging claim that we MISrepresent Rome. Will Suzanne now tells us Seeber doesn’t represent Rome! He was asked to give an answer for why he is not upset with Seeber. As usual, the super-terrorist then moved into an unbridled attack against the Adventist Church LEAVING THE QUESTION COMPLETELY UNTOUCHED!!
Now some of you may well not be convinced that Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholics on the newsgroups. Actually, to this day, even those on the newsgroups who formerly denied it had to confess that Seeber did just that, and they went into every manner of defense for Seeber. As we expose the dialogues, we will more prove this. However, since we started this work, another person came out more boldly and gave approval of the deaths of millions of Christians. She posts under the name of Teresita. When I made mention of that great Christian work Foxe’s Book of Martyrs, detailing centuries of uncountable murders of bible-believing Christians, she referred to the work as:
Naturally, we got on her case for her boldness here as we still have the liberty to do in this free country.
Teresita in response lied to us, telling us that when she called Foxe's Book of Martyrs "Foxe's Book of Heretics," she was only referring to the Albigenses of the Protestant Reformation 5/29/2003 who were a minority group of Christians during that time: <http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bb521t01p...>
How do we know she was lying? The Albigenses were hardly mentioned in that massive work. Protestants usually have little to say about the Albigenses BECAUSE BOTH THEMSELVES AND ALL THEIR WORKS WERE COMPLETELY ANNIHILATED BY ROME! But more proof that she was lying comes in her next response as she worked to divert from my advancing questions:
When pressed further and further to reveal her beliefs she is trained to hide on the matter of the value of human life, Teresita says the Vatican merely carried out God's commands when they killed millions of Christians because the Israelites did the same with their enemies. Here she is freely admitting what all those “Anti-Catholics” and “Catholic-haters” have been saying all along:
In article <6s6bdv0l317i6dfjs86mheig36vm8ne...@4ax.com>, Susan says...
>Like Ted Seeber, you gave approval to their deaths and then come on the forums telling me I hate people just because they disagree.
>We are still under Homeland Security right through to the destruction of this nation. We are asked to report all terrorist activity found >in people who have a profound disrespect of human life!
Teresita replies: We merely carried out God's commandment in His Eternal Word:
Deuteronomy 17:2-5 "If there is found among you, within any of your towns which the Lord your God gives you, a man or woman who does what is evil in the sight of the Lord your God, in transgressing his covenant, and has gone and served other gods and worshiped them, or the sun or the moon or any of the host of heaven, which I have forbidden, and it is told you and you hear of it; then you shall inquire diligently, and if it is true and certain that such an abominable thing has been done in Israel, then you shall bring forth to your gates that man or woman who has done this evil thing, and you shall stone that man or woman to death with stones."
From: Teresita (teres...@newsguy.com) Subject: Re: #TWO "CULT" COMPARED better version View: Complete Thread (21 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, tnn.religion.catholic Date: 2003-09-21 11:52:08 PST In article <3dqrmvoit629haa6l7dk45d4e25165n...@4ax.com>, Susan Williams says...
>I saw an official Catholic website on the Inquisition that said the same >thing Teresita said: That Rome can put non-Catholics to death based >upon the word of God.
Leviticus 24:16 Anyone who blasphemes the name of the LORD must be put to death. The entire assembly must stone him. Whether an alien or native-born, when he blasphemes the Name, he must be put to death.
ARE YOU LISTENING HOMELAND SECURITY??? She claims the scriptures mandated their actions IN THE NEW TESTAMENT!! Is it the New Testament now? Do those scriptures still exist now and have weight now IN THE NEW TESTAMENT??
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 14:24:32 -0500, an00...@hotmail.com wrote: >On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 14:14:44 -0500, Susan Williams ><SWilliams0717196...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Hey Susie!
>How about them "Jews"??
>Where do they stand..?
As you can see, the super-criminal joins all the other psychiatrists in saying my posts are insane and incoherent, so they naturally do what all others do with posts that are constantly incoherent...
ASK QUESTIONS!!
Here are the words super-terrorists have to skip around and avoid expounding upon and explaining line by line...
Here is the story that has the super-criminals of the Pope hanging around our posts. Why do we keep talking about 911 more than 3 years after?
People posted that all non-Catholics must die. We were uspet about it. Suddenly, as told us by Jack Chick, we have strange people from different denominations attacking us ONLY and for years have refused to say one bad word against those who did this.
Lest you forget the issue or evidence, here it is...
===========
Here's the bold death mandate against all non-Catholics this abandoned despot ignores constantly to this day...
============
These Jesuits created a post entitled, "In Defense of the Church Wiping Out Heretics!" You can find that thread here:
In response to this, since they violate all their lying tirades against making attacks and accusations to attack us as hateful, we responded with another thread entitled, "IN DEFENSE OF THE CHURCH WIPING OUR HER NEIGHBOURS"
The thread was expounding upon the Parable of the Good Samaritan where Christ shows how those not of our religion should be treated contrary to the mandates of Rome!
A man by the name of Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholic life when with approval he told us that:
"NONE of the groups persecuted by the Catholics were living the Bible. They were living their personal interpretations of God, not the Bible"
Brother Ted revealed that this was done just after the 911 attacks when America was assessing what a terrorist was with respect to human life. Prime Minister Tony Blair, a short time after the 911 attacks gave the world a definition of terrorists by telling us they are people who have a marked disrespect for human life. Since Seeber told us with approval that Rome persecuted non-Catholics because they did not live the bible, how many of the victims of 911 live the bible? Did Seeber give condolences to the victims of 911 after the attacks? If so, why? Did he mean it?
Because of the revelation, Ted Seeber had to make an excuse and leave. He left his website up, but his pictures and other things appeared to have disappeared from it.
Soon, another killer super-terrorist became insensed at what was done to Ted Seeber. He then moved out to attack me as I was showing how Seeber confirmed THAT ROME HADN'T CHANGED. She still has mass-exterminations as part of her agenda, practice and habits. To accomplish this she has demons in human form trained to storm all free media and teach people how they must understand that people will disagree.
That killer refashioned his name after mine in the reverse and called himself "William Suzanne." The man then entered with the boldest of lies, much like John Ashcroft telling us the Patriot Act is Constitutional!
He comes in telling us that SEEBER DOESN'T SPEAK FOR (or represent) Rome in his condemnation of all non-Catholics.
I had to ask the super-terrorist more than once why then he wasn't upset with Seeber for MISREPRESENTING Rome. Jesuits are all over the newsgroups ranting and raging claim that we MISrepresent Rome. Will Suzanne now tells us Seeber doesn’t represent Rome! He was asked to give an answer for why he is not upset with Seeber. As usual, the super-terrorist then moved into an unbridled attack against the Adventist Church LEAVING THE QUESTION COMPLETELY UNTOUCHED!!
Now some of you may well not be convinced that Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholics on the newsgroups. Actually, to this day, even those on the newsgroups who formerly denied it had to confess that Seeber did just that, and they went into every manner of defense for Seeber. As we expose the dialogues, we will more prove this. However, since we started this work, another person came out more boldly and gave approval of the deaths of millions of Christians. She posts under the name of Teresita. When I made mention of that great Christian work Foxe’s Book of Martyrs, detailing centuries of uncountable murders of bible-believing Christians, she referred to the work as:
Naturally, we got on her case for her boldness here as we still have the liberty to do in this free country.
Teresita in response lied to us, telling us that when she called Foxe's Book of Martyrs "Foxe's Book of Heretics," she was only referring to the Albigenses of the Protestant Reformation 5/29/2003 who were a minority group of Christians during that time: <http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bb521t01p...>
How do we know she was lying? The Albigenses were hardly mentioned in that massive work. Protestants usually have little to say about the Albigenses BECAUSE BOTH THEMSELVES AND ALL THEIR WORKS WERE COMPLETELY ANNIHILATED BY ROME! But more proof that she was lying comes in her next response as she worked to divert from my advancing questions:
When pressed further and further to reveal her beliefs she is trained to hide on the matter of the value of human life, Teresita says the Vatican merely carried out God's commands when they killed millions of Christians because the Israelites did the same with their enemies. Here she is freely admitting what all those “Anti-Catholics” and “Catholic-haters” have been saying all along:
In article <6s6bdv0l317i6dfjs86mheig36vm8ne...@4ax.com>, Susan says...
>Like Ted Seeber, you gave approval to their deaths and then come on the forums telling me I hate people just because they disagree.
>We are still under Homeland Security right through to the destruction of this nation. We are asked to report all terrorist activity found >in people who have a profound disrespect of human life!
Teresita replies: We merely carried out God's commandment in His Eternal Word:
Deuteronomy 17:2-5 "If there is found among you, within any of your towns which the Lord your God gives you, a man or woman who does what is evil in the sight of the Lord your God, in transgressing his covenant, and has gone and served other gods and worshiped them, or the sun or the moon or any of the host of heaven, which I have forbidden, and it is told you and you hear of it; then you shall inquire diligently, and if it is true and certain that such an abominable thing has been done in Israel, then you shall bring forth to your gates that man or woman who has done this evil thing, and you shall stone that man or woman to death with stones."
From: Teresita (teres...@newsguy.com) Subject: Re: #TWO "CULT" COMPARED better version View: Complete Thread (21 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, tnn.religion.catholic Date: 2003-09-21 11:52:08 PST In article <3dqrmvoit629haa6l7dk45d4e25165n...@4ax.com>, Susan Williams says...
>I saw an official Catholic website on the Inquisition that said the same >thing Teresita said: That Rome can put non-Catholics to death based >upon the word of God.
Leviticus 24:16 Anyone who blasphemes the name of the LORD must be put to death. The entire assembly must stone him. Whether an alien or native-born, when he blasphemes the Name, he must be put to death.
ARE YOU LISTENING HOMELAND SECURITY??? She claims the scriptures mandated their actions IN THE NEW TESTAMENT!! Is it the New Testament now? Do those scriptures still exist now and have weight now IN THE NEW TESTAMENT??
I'm guessing now that you are infact a catholic yourself and trying to rev people up, and causing inter-denomenational trouble. It makes no sense whatsoever anything you are saying.
Were's the fact..... NOT POSTINGS.... I mean actual facts, articles, photos. Postings on here are'nt facts. Get us some real info if you believe all this stuff. Once again postings by individuals are not fact, not facts not fact not fact not facts not facts are not fact, not facts not fact not fact not facts not facts are not fact, not facts not fact not fact not facts not facts are not fact, not facts not fact not fact not facts not facts are not fact, not facts not fact not fact not facts not facts are not fact, not facts not fact not fact not facts not facts!!!!!!!!!!
On 11 Oct 2004 02:09:22 -0700, starblaz...@hotmail.com (Kenna) wrote:
>Susan,
>I'm guessing now that you are infact a catholic yourself and trying to >rev people up, and causing inter-denomenational trouble. It makes no >sense whatsoever anything you are saying.
By objecting to people posting that all non-Catholics must die as you believe?
>Were's the fact..... NOT POSTINGS.... I mean actual facts, articles, >photos. Postings on here are'nt facts.
Where's the actual facts that I'm crazy and hateful for objecting to your friends posting that all non-Catholics must die?
Facts proving this are below!
>et us some real info if you >believe all this stuff. Once again postings by individuals are not >fact, not facts not fact not fact not facts not facts are not fact, >not facts not fact not fact not facts not facts are not fact, not >facts not fact not fact not facts not facts are not fact, not facts >not fact not fact not facts not facts are not fact, not facts not fact >not fact not facts not facts are not fact, not facts not fact not fact >not facts not facts!!!!!!!!!!
Here is the story that has the super-criminals of the Pope hanging around our posts. Why do we keep talking about 911 more than 3 years after?
People posted that all non-Catholics must die. We were uspet about it. Suddenly, as told us by Jack Chick, we have strange people from different denominations attacking us ONLY and for years have refused to say one bad word against those who did this.
Lest you forget the issue or evidence, here it is...
===========
Here's the bold death mandate against all non-Catholics this abandoned despot ignores constantly to this day...
============
These Jesuits created a post entitled, "In Defense of the Church Wiping Out Heretics!" You can find that thread here:
In response to this, since they violate all their lying tirades against making attacks and accusations to attack us as hateful, we responded with another thread entitled, "IN DEFENSE OF THE CHURCH WIPING OUR HER NEIGHBOURS"
The thread was expounding upon the Parable of the Good Samaritan where Christ shows how those not of our religion should be treated contrary to the mandates of Rome!
A man by the name of Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholic life when with approval he told us that:
"NONE of the groups persecuted by the Catholics were living the Bible. They were living their personal interpretations of God, not the Bible"
Brother Ted revealed that this was done just after the 911 attacks when America was assessing what a terrorist was with respect to human life. Prime Minister Tony Blair, a short time after the 911 attacks gave the world a definition of terrorists by telling us they are people who have a marked disrespect for human life. Since Seeber told us with approval that Rome persecuted non-Catholics because they did not live the bible, how many of the victims of 911 live the bible? Did Seeber give condolences to the victims of 911 after the attacks? If so, why? Did he mean it?
Because of the revelation, Ted Seeber had to make an excuse and leave. He left his website up, but his pictures and other things appeared to have disappeared from it.
Soon, another killer super-terrorist became insensed at what was done to Ted Seeber. He then moved out to attack me as I was showing how Seeber confirmed THAT ROME HADN'T CHANGED. She still has mass-exterminations as part of her agenda, practice and habits. To accomplish this she has demons in human form trained to storm all free media and teach people how they must understand that people will disagree.
That killer refashioned his name after mine in the reverse and called himself "William Suzanne." The man then entered with the boldest of lies, much like John Ashcroft telling us the Patriot Act is Constitutional!
He comes in telling us that SEEBER DOESN'T SPEAK FOR (or represent) Rome in his condemnation of all non-Catholics.
I had to ask the super-terrorist more than once why then he wasn't upset with Seeber for MISREPRESENTING Rome. Jesuits are all over the newsgroups ranting and raging claim that we MISrepresent Rome. Will Suzanne now tells us Seeber doesn’t represent Rome! He was asked to give an answer for why he is not upset with Seeber. As usual, the super-terrorist then moved into an unbridled attack against the Adventist Church LEAVING THE QUESTION COMPLETELY UNTOUCHED!!
Now some of you may well not be convinced that Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholics on the newsgroups. Actually, to this day, even those on the newsgroups who formerly denied it had to confess that Seeber did just that, and they went into every manner of defense for Seeber. As we expose the dialogues, we will more prove this. However, since we started this work, another person came out more boldly and gave approval of the deaths of millions of Christians. She posts under the name of Teresita. When I made mention of that great Christian work Foxe’s Book of Martyrs, detailing centuries of uncountable murders of bible-believing Christians, she referred to the work as:
Naturally, we got on her case for her boldness here as we still have the liberty to do in this free country.
Teresita in response lied to us, telling us that when she called Foxe's Book of Martyrs "Foxe's Book of Heretics," she was only referring to the Albigenses of the Protestant Reformation 5/29/2003 who were a minority group of Christians during that time: <http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bb521t01p...>
How do we know she was lying? The Albigenses were hardly mentioned in that massive work. Protestants usually have little to say about the Albigenses BECAUSE BOTH THEMSELVES AND ALL THEIR WORKS WERE COMPLETELY ANNIHILATED BY ROME! But more proof that she was lying comes in her next response as she worked to divert from my advancing questions:
When pressed further and further to reveal her beliefs she is trained to hide on the matter of the value of human life, Teresita says the Vatican merely carried out God's commands when they killed millions of Christians because the Israelites did the same with their enemies. Here she is freely admitting what all those “Anti-Catholics” and “Catholic-haters” have been saying all along:
In article <6s6bdv0l317i6dfjs86mheig36vm8ne...@4ax.com>, Susan says...
>Like Ted Seeber, you gave approval to their deaths and then come on the forums telling me I hate people just because they disagree.
>We are still under Homeland Security right through to the destruction of this nation. We are asked to report all terrorist activity found >in people who have a profound disrespect of human life!
Teresita replies: We merely carried out God's commandment in His Eternal Word:
Deuteronomy 17:2-5 "If there is found among you, within any of your towns which the Lord your God gives you, a man or woman who does what is evil in the sight of the Lord your God, in transgressing his covenant, and has gone and served other gods and worshiped them, or the sun or the moon or any of the host of heaven, which I have forbidden, and it is told you and you hear of it; then you shall inquire diligently, and if it is true and certain that such an abominable thing has been done in Israel, then you shall bring forth to your gates that man or woman who has done this evil thing, and you shall stone that man or woman to death with stones."
From: Teresita (teres...@newsguy.com) Subject: Re: #TWO "CULT" COMPARED better version View: Complete Thread (21 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, tnn.religion.catholic Date: 2003-09-21 11:52:08 PST In article <3dqrmvoit629haa6l7dk45d4e25165n...@4ax.com>, Susan Williams says...
>I saw an official Catholic website on the Inquisition that said the same >thing Teresita said: That Rome can put non-Catholics to death based >upon the word of God.
Here is the story that has the super-criminals of the Pope hanging around our posts. Why do we keep talking about 911 more than 3 years after?
People posted that all non-Catholics must die. We were uspet about it. Suddenly, as told us by Jack Chick, we have strange people from different denominations attacking us ONLY and for years have refused to say one bad word against those who did this.
Lest you forget the issue or evidence, here it is...
===========
Here's the bold death mandate against all non-Catholics this abandoned despot ignores constantly to this day...
============
These Jesuits created a post entitled, "In Defense of the Church Wiping Out Heretics!" You can find that thread here:
In response to this, since they violate all their lying tirades against making attacks and accusations to attack us as hateful, we responded with another thread entitled, "IN DEFENSE OF THE CHURCH WIPING OUR HER NEIGHBOURS"
The thread was expounding upon the Parable of the Good Samaritan where Christ shows how those not of our religion should be treated contrary to the mandates of Rome!
A man by the name of Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholic life when with approval he told us that:
"NONE of the groups persecuted by the Catholics were living the Bible. They were living their personal interpretations of God, not the Bible"
Brother Ted revealed that this was done just after the 911 attacks when America was assessing what a terrorist was with respect to human life. Prime Minister Tony Blair, a short time after the 911 attacks gave the world a definition of terrorists by telling us they are people who have a marked disrespect for human life. Since Seeber told us with approval that Rome persecuted non-Catholics because they did not live the bible, how many of the victims of 911 live the bible? Did Seeber give condolences to the victims of 911 after the attacks? If so, why? Did he mean it?
Because of the revelation, Ted Seeber had to make an excuse and leave. He left his website up, but his pictures and other things appeared to have disappeared from it.
Soon, another killer super-terrorist became insensed at what was done to Ted Seeber. He then moved out to attack me as I was showing how Seeber confirmed THAT ROME HADN'T CHANGED. She still has mass-exterminations as part of her agenda, practice and habits. To accomplish this she has demons in human form trained to storm all free media and teach people how they must understand that people will disagree.
That killer refashioned his name after mine in the reverse and called himself "William Suzanne." The man then entered with the boldest of lies, much like John Ashcroft telling us the Patriot Act is Constitutional!
He comes in telling us that SEEBER DOESN'T SPEAK FOR (or represent) Rome in his condemnation of all non-Catholics.
I had to ask the super-terrorist more than once why then he wasn't upset with Seeber for MISREPRESENTING Rome. Jesuits are all over the newsgroups ranting and raging claim that we MISrepresent Rome. Will Suzanne now tells us Seeber doesn’t represent Rome! He was asked to give an answer for why he is not upset with Seeber. As usual, the super-terrorist then moved into an unbridled attack against the Adventist Church LEAVING THE QUESTION COMPLETELY UNTOUCHED!!
Now some of you may well not be convinced that Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholics on the newsgroups. Actually, to this day, even those on the newsgroups who formerly denied it had to confess that Seeber did just that, and they went into every manner of defense for Seeber. As we expose the dialogues, we will more prove this. However, since we started this work, another person came out more boldly and gave approval of the deaths of millions of Christians. She posts under the name of Teresita. When I made mention of that great Christian work Foxe’s Book of Martyrs, detailing centuries of uncountable murders of bible-believing Christians, she referred to the work as:
Naturally, we got on her case for her boldness here as we still have the liberty to do in this free country.
Teresita in response lied to us, telling us that when she called Foxe's Book of Martyrs "Foxe's Book of Heretics," she was only referring to the Albigenses of the Protestant Reformation 5/29/2003 who were a minority group of Christians during that time: <http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bb521t01p...>
How do we know she was lying? The Albigenses were hardly mentioned in that massive work. Protestants usually have little to say about the Albigenses BECAUSE BOTH THEMSELVES AND ALL THEIR WORKS WERE COMPLETELY ANNIHILATED BY ROME! But more proof that she was lying comes in her next response as she worked to divert from my advancing questions:
When pressed further and further to reveal her beliefs she is trained to hide on the matter of the value of human life, Teresita says the Vatican merely carried out God's commands when they killed millions of Christians because the Israelites did the same with their enemies. Here she is freely admitting what all those “Anti-Catholics” and “Catholic-haters” have been saying all along:
In article <6s6bdv0l317i6dfjs86mheig36vm8ne...@4ax.com>, Susan says...
>Like Ted Seeber, you gave approval to their deaths and then come on the forums telling me I hate people just because they disagree.
>We are still under Homeland Security right through to the destruction of this nation. We are asked to report all terrorist activity found >in people who have a profound disrespect of human life!
Teresita replies: We merely carried out God's commandment in His Eternal Word:
Deuteronomy 17:2-5 "If there is found among you, within any of your towns which the Lord your God gives you, a man or woman who does what is evil in the sight of the Lord your God, in transgressing his covenant, and has gone and served other gods and worshiped them, or the sun or the moon or any of the host of heaven, which I have forbidden, and it is told you and you hear of it; then you shall inquire diligently, and if it is true and certain that such an abominable thing has been done in Israel, then you shall bring forth to your gates that man or woman who has done this evil thing, and you shall stone that man or woman to death with stones."
From: Teresita (teres...@newsguy.com) Subject: Re: #TWO "CULT" COMPARED better version View: Complete Thread (21 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, tnn.religion.catholic Date: 2003-09-21 11:52:08 PST In article <3dqrmvoit629haa6l7dk45d4e25165n...@4ax.com>, Susan Williams says...
>I saw an official Catholic website on the Inquisition that said the same >thing Teresita said: That Rome can put non-Catholics to death based >upon the word of God.
Leviticus 24:16 Anyone who blasphemes the name of the LORD must be put to death. The entire assembly must stone him. Whether an alien or native-born, when he blasphemes the Name, he must be put to death.
ARE YOU LISTENING HOMELAND SECURITY??? She claims the scriptures mandated their actions IN THE NEW TESTAMENT!! Is it the New Testament now? Do those scriptures still exist now and have weight now IN THE NEW TESTAMENT??
After telling us that just to expose these facts about Rome she is now boldly admitting is hatred, what would happen if we took a look at what ANTI-PROTESTANTISM always was throughout the ages? When we brought this issue about
...
I asked about evidence and once again you referred to a posting. I said get me real evidence. Once again, evidence consists of photos, recordings videotape. You need to get this before I will believe you. Now if you did THAT, that would make for an interesting post.
Please don't just go "here's the evidence" and copy and paste yet a nother boring post. Get us evidence ......counting on you Susan to come through for us.
Don't forget, watch a few episodes of Macgyver, or Jag before you sneak in to get the evidence. Enjoy the mission my fellow protestant!!!!! Onward Christian soldier and all that.
Susan Williams <SWilliams0717196...@hotmail.com> wrote in message <news:fuh7l0he2502u39s4j0jnkbv12sjelntvl@4ax.com>... > I, Susan Williams, was again confronted with Jesuit excuses for the > fact that Terrorists staged a daring attacking during 911 involving > planes traveling awesome distances into the most controlled airspace > in America as if they knew the plan would go through.
Yup - 4 commercial jets were hijacked and flew 100s of miles off course for over an hour and the AF never turned a wheel. But there's no way the bush gang was involved.
On 13 Oct 2004 19:56:39 -0700, starblaz...@hotmail.com (Kenna) wrote:
>According to Susan Williams it was the pope.... not Bush!!!! Or was >it Bush and the Pope. Or was it the Pope, Bush and the Deli Lama walk >on to a 737................. ;-)
You mean here are the words below you are avoiding?...
They are then followed by other super-terrorists who attack us alone. That is because we object to those posts demanding the destruction of all non-Catholics.
From there they patiently babble to us in lies, telling us they are not the deadly foot-soldiers of the Pope!
Here is the story that has the super-criminals of the Pope hanging around our posts. Why do we keep talking about 911 more than 3 years after?
People posted that all non-Catholics must die. We were uspet about it. Suddenly, as told us by Jack Chick, we have strange people from different denominations attacking us ONLY and for years have refused to say one bad word against those who did this.
Lest you forget the issue or evidence, here it is...
===========
Here's the bold death mandate against all non-Catholics this abandoned despot ignores constantly to this day...
============
These Jesuits created a post entitled, "In Defense of the Church Wiping Out Heretics!" You can find that thread here:
In response to this, since they violate all their lying tirades against making attacks and accusations to attack us as hateful, we responded with another thread entitled, "IN DEFENSE OF THE CHURCH WIPING OUR HER NEIGHBOURS"
The thread was expounding upon the Parable of the Good Samaritan where Christ shows how those not of our religion should be treated contrary to the mandates of Rome!
A man by the name of Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholic life when with approval he told us that:
"NONE of the groups persecuted by the Catholics were living the Bible. They were living their personal interpretations of God, not the Bible"
Brother Ted revealed that this was done just after the 911 attacks when America was assessing what a terrorist was with respect to human life. Prime Minister Tony Blair, a short time after the 911 attacks gave the world a definition of terrorists by telling us they are people who have a marked disrespect for human life. Since Seeber told us with approval that Rome persecuted non-Catholics because they did not live the bible, how many of the victims of 911 live the bible? Did Seeber give condolences to the victims of 911 after the attacks? If so, why? Did he mean it?
Because of the revelation, Ted Seeber had to make an excuse and leave. He left his website up, but his pictures and other things appeared to have disappeared from it.
Soon, another killer super-terrorist became insensed at what was done to Ted Seeber. He then moved out to attack me as I was showing how Seeber confirmed THAT ROME HADN'T CHANGED. She still has mass-exterminations as part of her agenda, practice and habits. To accomplish this she has demons in human form trained to storm all free media and teach people how they must understand that people will disagree.
That killer refashioned his name after mine in the reverse and called himself "William Suzanne." The man then entered with the boldest of lies, much like John Ashcroft telling us the Patriot Act is Constitutional!
He comes in telling us that SEEBER DOESN'T SPEAK FOR (or represent) Rome in his condemnation of all non-Catholics.
I had to ask the super-terrorist more than once why then he wasn't upset with Seeber for MISREPRESENTING Rome. Jesuits are all over the newsgroups ranting and raging claim that we MISrepresent Rome. Will Suzanne now tells us Seeber doesn’t represent Rome! He was asked to give an answer for why he is not upset with Seeber. As usual, the super-terrorist then moved into an unbridled attack against the Adventist Church LEAVING THE QUESTION COMPLETELY UNTOUCHED!!
Now some of you may well not be convinced that Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholics on the newsgroups. Actually, to this day, even those on the newsgroups who formerly denied it had to confess that Seeber did just that, and they went into every manner of defense for Seeber. As we expose the dialogues, we will more prove this. However, since we started this work, another person came out more boldly and gave approval of the deaths of millions of Christians. She posts under the name of Teresita. When I made mention of that great Christian work Foxe’s Book of Martyrs, detailing centuries of uncountable murders of bible-believing Christians, she referred to the work as:
Naturally, we got on her case for her boldness here as we still have the liberty to do in this free country.
Teresita in response lied to us, telling us that when she called Foxe's Book of Martyrs "Foxe's Book of Heretics," she was only referring to the Albigenses of the Protestant Reformation 5/29/2003 who were a minority group of Christians during that time: <http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=bb521t01p...>
How do we know she was lying? The Albigenses were hardly mentioned in that massive work. Protestants usually have little to say about the Albigenses BECAUSE BOTH THEMSELVES AND ALL THEIR WORKS WERE COMPLETELY ANNIHILATED BY ROME! But more proof that she was lying comes in her next response as she worked to divert from my advancing questions:
When pressed further and further to reveal her beliefs she is trained to hide on the matter of the value of human life, Teresita says the Vatican merely carried out God's commands when they killed millions of Christians because the Israelites did the same with their enemies. Here she is freely admitting what all those “Anti-Catholics” and “Catholic-haters” have been saying all along:
In article <6s6bdv0l317i6dfjs86mheig36vm8ne...@4ax.com>, Susan says...
>Like Ted Seeber, you gave approval to their deaths and then come on the forums telling me I hate people just because they disagree.
>We are still under Homeland Security right through to the destruction of this nation. We are asked to report all terrorist activity found >in people who have a profound disrespect of human life!
Teresita replies: We merely carried out God's commandment in His Eternal Word:
Deuteronomy 17:2-5 "If there is found among you, within any of your towns which the Lord your God gives you, a man or woman who does what is evil in the sight of the Lord your God, in transgressing his covenant, and has gone and served other gods and worshiped them, or the sun or the moon or any of the host of heaven, which I have forbidden, and it is told you and you hear of it; then you shall inquire diligently, and if it is true and certain that such an abominable thing has been done in Israel, then you shall bring forth to your gates that man or woman who has done this evil thing, and you shall stone that man or woman to death with stones."
From: Teresita (teres...@newsguy.com) Subject: Re: #TWO "CULT" COMPARED better version View: Complete Thread (21 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.adventist, alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, tnn.religion.catholic Date: 2003-09-21 11:52:08 PST In article <3dqrmvoit629haa6l7dk45d4e25165n...@4ax.com>, Susan Williams says...
>I saw an official Catholic website on the Inquisition that said the same >thing Teresita said: That Rome can put non-Catholics to death based >upon the word of God.
Leviticus 24:16 Anyone who blasphemes the name of the LORD must be put to death. The entire assembly must stone him. Whether an alien or native-born, when he blasphemes the Name, he must be put to death.
ARE YOU LISTENING HOMELAND SECURITY??? She claims the scriptures mandated their actions IN THE NEW TESTAMENT!! Is it the New Testament now? Do those scriptures still exist now and have weight now IN THE NEW TESTAMENT??
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 17:49:25 +0100, "Don" <d...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>"Kenna" <starblaz...@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:c787cdb7.0410131856.3b37a9d7@posting.google.com... >> According to Susan Williams it was the pope.... not Bush!!!! Or was >> it Bush and the Pope. Or was it the Pope, Bush and the Deli Lama walk >> on to a 737................. ;-)
>Now that is witty!
>regards >Don
As "witty" as Jesuit Don who labors much and posts and posts complaints with insults claiming I am insane and yet can't leave my threads? The Jesuit Oath says a Jesuit is to make "RELENTLESS" or non-ceasing war against their enemies.
Jesuits Don, Kenna and a host of others waste much manhours in constant posts, but ignore my just simple request TO EXPOUND UPON THE WORDS BELOW WHERE THEIR FRIENDS CLAIM ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE!
Dear friends: Here we are again with an urgent appeal to you. Things have gotten so out of hand, that we wonder why even try. Viewing that the issues at hand involve much blood however, we have to ask again and try again. It is not a pleasant task, but we have to do it. Feast your eyes on the following very incredible posts. They represent a nightmare we have been facing for years. Some of the most amazing people capable of acts no criminal in jail can commit have been getting bolder and bolder in their posts on the newsgroups. Their boldness corresponds to the actions of those currently in leadership capacity in the United States and all over the world specifically in government, media, education and even religion. As events toward change move more and more rapidly they become more and more bold. Take a look at these taken from the Google Newsgroups Archives. We first meet a poster who is very very upset about something. What is he upset about?...
From: Shan (shankar...@yahoo.com) Subject: Re: #DEVIL SUSAN ANGRY COULDN'T PROVE ROME DEMANDS DEATHS OF ALL NON-CATHOLICS! Date: 2003-10-22 05:57:44 PST
I want you Harlot Bitch Whore SUSAN and your cohorts to die.
ALL ADVENTISTS, LATTER DAY MORONS AND JEHOVAH'S NUTNESSES ARE FROM SATAN AND MUST DIE.
Shan
[Look at what he is writing. You can see he is more than upset. What could have caused him to be this upset? Surely, you must be saying, he is just a little perturbed and doesn't mean what he is saying. Is that true? Watch now as he makes sure that everyone understands clearly what he is writing...]
From: Shan (shankar...@yahoo.com) Subject: Re: #DEVIL SUSAN ANGRY COULDN'T PROVE ROME DEMANDS DEATHS OF ALL NON-CATHOLICS! Date: 2003-10-20 14:59:55 PST
Hey Harlot Susan Whore, for your sake, just to please your evil nature, I am going to write it down in uppercase:
I THE UNDERSIGNED CONDEMN ALL ADVENTISTS, LATTER DAY MORONS AND JEHOVAH'S NUTNESS TO EXTERMINATION.
ALL OTHER PROTESTANTS ARE SPARED.
SHAN
[Just to please my evil nature he says, he writes words like these during our "new day" when terrorism has become a big issue. Now, isn't it better to joke about a bomb in an airport? Only just to please my nature? Notice how he says all other Protestants are spared? You must have guessed by now that he is Catholic, or rather, a Jesuit. That we define as a footsoldier of the Pope who even engages in subversion, and has the same mind as the Inquisitors of the Dark Ages. Actually we more specifically believe that he is a member of Opus Dei. Here are some more. Look at this very strange post in answer to another very caustic individual named "Alan"...]
> > Do you think devils are good pets or will they eat you someday?
Alan:
> Is this little devil called Ted McMillan ?
I know for a fact that Ted is not little. Not only is he so hung he can suck himself, but I can take it all the way down. Try that, jesuit!
In His Grace,
Susan
[This post has my name on it, but I did not write this post. The same one by the name of "Shan" most likely wrote it. Several times people like him have been without conscience enough to fabricate posts as if they were sent by me. In this case you can tell it is not me who posted by the email address. He knows that most would get caught on this. The email address shown there is SWilliams07171964...@hotmail.com. Notice the three (3) "I"s before the "@" sign? My actual email address has two (2) "I"s. Time and time again they showcase how unscrupulous they are and taunt us into thinking they have a real advantage. But we don't desire to be like them. They think their behavior merits more rewards for them in heaven. We know better! But by looking at their talents, and then sitting down and thinking, you would be able to more and more understand what the future is for the world.
Here he calls the name "Ted." He is referring to Ted McMillan, who is a good friend of mine who has had to face them like me. Ted is super-intelligent to the point where they constantly also call him insane, sick, etc., but leech on to his posts for dear emergency. They know his posts reveal the truth. Why else would they constantly trail his posts, calling them insane, and leave the rest of the internet neglected? I learned much of what I know through Ted McMillan.
It is always important for them to smother out what Brother Ted is saying. He reveals who they are and what they are up to. That's when he was posting on the newsgroups. He was usually the editor of my posts. You see and notice the boldness of the posts above, and can't imagine that to even be bold enough to post like that tells you they seem to know something about the times and about THE GOVERNMENT! Shan continues here below, in this case posting along with another one attacking us named "Alan" for the same reasons and on the same premise. What reasons are they?...] http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=c59f...
From: Susan Williams (SWilliams07171964...@hotmail.com) Subject: Re: #HAIRY-LEGGED SUSAN ACTUALLY MAN NAMED TED McMILLAN!! MAJOR expose! Date: 2004-01-21 15:22:23 PST
> Gasp. Ted must shortly be due to stump his way around the well worn track > again.
But Ted's lovely hot stump is almost as good as yours. At least one of the best Jesuits I've had. But we all know what you are really after.
<snip>
This post again was not written by me. Brother Ted revealed that they are Jesuits, or rather foot-soldiers of the Pope though they profess to come from different denominations or even claim to be Seventh-day Adventists: that is, INFILTRATORS. They therefore have to do anything possible to take people off the track that they really are Jesuits. The most popular tactic is to make jokes against the facts. Obviously the man posting above and then impersonating me is very angry. What could have caused him to get to this state? Amazingly it was because some friends of his made some other very bold posts. Here is his explanation of what we did that raised his dander. He here speaks to one claiming to be a Seventh-day Adventist named "Andrew" who also hates us no bounds:
Andrew, Search for "Sonny Maou" and you would know waht happened. I am sick and tired of reading attacks on everything relating to my faith, Catholicism.
I am not willing to tolerate it any longer for anybodies sake, include yours.
The ex-Archbishop of Canterburry was blamed recently for his remarks on Muslim leaders because he said they do not condemn terrorism. You, Andrew and other good Christians, are doing the same like Muslim leaders because you do not lift a finger to condemn those who are constantly attacking my faith beginning with this Sonny Maou who maybe a reincarnation of the harlot man/woman Susan, Cindy or whatever these idiots call themselves.
[Watch as Shan now accuses us of doing just what he has done in sending email that impersonates me...]
It is very easy to create a bogus e-mail and sign in as someone else so Susan maybe Sonny or anybody.
This situation will not be tolerated no matter what. Simply put, anybody who attacks my faith will receive response in ten folds. I am the first to criticize clergy but I will not permit anybody to attack the faith and go unpunished.
Shan
Notice his ancient or "inquisitor" style of speaking? As you can see here, he claims we attacked Rome. Is that true? Well what would it look like to you if we witnessed posters on the internet TELLING US THAT ALL NON-CATHOLICS SHOULD BE EXTERMINATED, and that it is "JUST BUSINESS" TO EXTERMINATE THEM? Would you be upset about that? Well some posters sent posts with those exact words and meaning. We, being non-Catholics no less, were very upset about it. We exposed those posters AND THE OTHERS WHO DEFENDED THEM. That is what Shan is angry about.
They first made many posts against the principles of the American Constitution and the document itself. They then also made posts against basic liberty. In this, they presented themselves as mere debaters claiming they had a right to their opinions while they
...
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 17:49:25 +0100, "Don" <d...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>"Kenna" <starblaz...@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:c787cdb7.0410131856.3b37a9d7@posting.google.com... >> According to Susan Williams it was the pope.... not Bush!!!! Or was >> it Bush and the Pope. Or was it the Pope, Bush and the Deli Lama walk >> on to a 737................. ;-)
>Now that is witty!
>regards >Don
As "witty" as Jesuit Don who labors much and posts and posts complaints with insults claiming I am insane and yet can't leave my threads? The Jesuit Oath says a Jesuit is to make "RELENTLESS" or non-ceasing war against their enemies.
Jesuits Don, Kenna and a host of others waste much manhours in constant posts, but ignore my just simple request TO EXPOUND UPON THE WORDS BELOW WHERE THEIR FRIENDS CLAIM ALL NON-CATHOLICS MUST DIE!
Dear friends: Here we are again with an urgent appeal to you. Things have gotten so out of hand, that we wonder why even try. Viewing that the issues at hand involve much blood however, we have to ask again and try again. It is not a pleasant task, but we have to do it. Feast your eyes on the following very incredible posts. They represent a nightmare we have been facing for years. Some of the most amazing people capable of acts no criminal in jail can commit have been getting bolder and bolder in their posts on the newsgroups. Their boldness corresponds to the actions of those currently in leadership capacity in the United States and all over the world specifically in government, media, education and even religion. As events toward change move more and more rapidly they become more and more bold. Take a look at these taken from the Google Newsgroups Archives. We first meet a poster who is very very upset about something. What is he upset about?...
From: Shan (shankar...@yahoo.com) Subject: Re: #DEVIL SUSAN ANGRY COULDN'T PROVE ROME DEMANDS DEATHS OF ALL NON-CATHOLICS! Date: 2003-10-22 05:57:44 PST
I want you Harlot Bitch Whore SUSAN and your cohorts to die.
ALL ADVENTISTS, LATTER DAY MORONS AND JEHOVAH'S NUTNESSES ARE FROM SATAN AND MUST DIE.
Shan
[Look at what he is writing. You can see he is more than upset. What could have caused him to be this upset? Surely, you must be saying, he is just a little perturbed and doesn't mean what he is saying. Is that true? Watch now as he makes sure that everyone understands clearly what he is writing...]
From: Shan (shankar...@yahoo.com) Subject: Re: #DEVIL SUSAN ANGRY COULDN'T PROVE ROME DEMANDS DEATHS OF ALL NON-CATHOLICS! Date: 2003-10-20 14:59:55 PST
Hey Harlot Susan Whore, for your sake, just to please your evil nature, I am going to write it down in uppercase:
I THE UNDERSIGNED CONDEMN ALL ADVENTISTS, LATTER DAY MORONS AND JEHOVAH'S NUTNESS TO EXTERMINATION.
ALL OTHER PROTESTANTS ARE SPARED.
SHAN
[Just to please my evil nature he says, he writes words like these during our "new day" when terrorism has become a big issue. Now, isn't it better to joke about a bomb in an airport? Only just to please my nature? Notice how he says all other Protestants are spared? You must have guessed by now that he is Catholic, or rather, a Jesuit. That we define as a footsoldier of the Pope who even engages in subversion, and has the same mind as the Inquisitors of the Dark Ages. Actually we more specifically believe that he is a member of Opus Dei. Here are some more. Look at this very strange post in answer to another very caustic individual named "Alan"...]
> > Do you think devils are good pets or will they eat you someday?
Alan:
> Is this little devil called Ted McMillan ?
I know for a fact that Ted is not little. Not only is he so hung he can suck himself, but I can take it all the way down. Try that, jesuit!
In His Grace,
Susan
[This post has my name on it, but I did not write this post. The same one by the name of "Shan" most likely wrote it. Several times people like him have been without conscience enough to fabricate posts as if they were sent by me. In this case you can tell it is not me who posted by the email address. He knows that most would get caught on this. The email address shown there is SWilliams07171964...@hotmail.com. Notice the three (3) "I"s before the "@" sign? My actual email address has two (2) "I"s. Time and time again they showcase how unscrupulous they are and taunt us into thinking they have a real advantage. But we don't desire to be like them. They think their behavior merits more rewards for them in heaven. We know better! But by looking at their talents, and then sitting down and thinking, you would be able to more and more understand what the future is for the world.
Here he calls the name "Ted." He is referring to Ted McMillan, who is a good friend of mine who has had to face them like me. Ted is super-intelligent to the point where they constantly also call him insane, sick, etc., but leech on to his posts for dear emergency. They know his posts reveal the truth. Why else would they constantly trail his posts, calling them insane, and leave the rest of the internet neglected? I learned much of what I know through Ted McMillan.
It is always important for them to smother out what Brother Ted is saying. He reveals who they are and what they are up to. That's when he was posting on the newsgroups. He was usually the editor of my posts. You see and notice the boldness of the posts above, and can't imagine that to even be bold enough to post like that tells you they seem to know something about the times and about THE GOVERNMENT! Shan continues here below, in this case posting along with another one attacking us named "Alan" for the same reasons and on the same premise. What reasons are they?...] http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=c59f...
From: Susan Williams (SWilliams07171964...@hotmail.com) Subject: Re: #HAIRY-LEGGED SUSAN ACTUALLY MAN NAMED TED McMILLAN!! MAJOR expose! Date: 2004-01-21 15:22:23 PST
> Gasp. Ted must shortly be due to stump his way around the well worn track > again.
But Ted's lovely hot stump is almost as good as yours. At least one of the best Jesuits I've had. But we all know what you are really after.
<snip>
This post again was not written by me. Brother Ted revealed that they are Jesuits, or rather foot-soldiers of the Pope though they profess to come from different denominations or even claim to be Seventh-day Adventists: that is, INFILTRATORS. They therefore have to do anything possible to take people off the track that they really are Jesuits. The most popular tactic is to make jokes against the facts. Obviously the man posting above and then impersonating me is very angry. What could have caused him to get to this state? Amazingly it was because some friends of his made some other very bold posts. Here is his explanation of what we did that raised his dander. He here speaks to one claiming to be a Seventh-day Adventist named "Andrew" who also hates us no bounds:
Andrew, Search for "Sonny Maou" and you would know waht happened. I am sick and tired of reading attacks on everything relating to my faith, Catholicism.
I am not willing to tolerate it any longer for anybodies sake, include yours.
The ex-Archbishop of Canterburry was blamed recently for his remarks on Muslim leaders because he said they do not condemn terrorism. You, Andrew and other good Christians, are doing the same like Muslim leaders because you do not lift a finger to condemn those who are constantly attacking my faith beginning with this Sonny Maou who maybe a reincarnation of the harlot man/woman Susan, Cindy or whatever these idiots call themselves.
[Watch as Shan now accuses us of doing just what he has done in sending email that impersonates me...]
It is very easy to create a bogus e-mail and sign in as someone else so Susan maybe Sonny or anybody.
This situation will not be tolerated no matter what. Simply put, anybody who attacks my faith will receive response in ten folds. I am the first to criticize clergy but I will not permit anybody to attack the faith and go unpunished.
Shan
Notice his ancient or "inquisitor" style of speaking? As you can see here, he claims we attacked Rome. Is that true? Well what would it look like to you if we witnessed posters on the internet TELLING US THAT ALL NON-CATHOLICS SHOULD BE EXTERMINATED, and that it is "JUST BUSINESS" TO EXTERMINATE THEM? Would you be upset about that? Well some posters sent posts with those exact words and meaning. We, being non-Catholics no less, were very upset about it. We exposed those posters AND THE OTHERS WHO DEFENDED THEM. That is what Shan is angry about.
They first made many posts against the principles of the American Constitution and the document itself. They then also made posts against basic liberty. In this, they presented themselves as mere debaters claiming they had a right to their opinions while they
...
"From there they patiently babble to us in lies, telling us they are not the deadly foot-soldiers of the Pope!"
That is without doubt the most ludricous statement I've ever heard. I am no longer a member of the 1st Vatican Deadly foot soldier Brigade. They kicked me out for not being CATHOLIC.
Have you realised, Susan, that you bear the greatest responsibility for repeating, repeating, repeating the assertion that "all non-Catholics must die."
But seriously, Susan, can you explain to me how it is that your belief that President Bush was involved in the plot to fly airliners into the twin towers is related to your much repeated mantra that all non-Catholics must die?
And you think she does. But I guess I'm just being a Protestant Jesuit. :-)
I don't eve3n know what one of them is really. Except some monks, which makes her point even dumber. But I guess if it was'nt for the Catholics susan would be a Jew hahahahahaha.
> And you think she does. But I guess I'm just being a Protestant > Jesuit. :-)
> I don't eve3n know what one of them is really. Except some monks, > which makes her point even dumber. But I guess if it was'nt for the > Catholics susan would be a Jew hahahahahaha.
Kenna,
I do believe we have lost Susan Williams before she has even given us the courtesy of answering our civil questions. You asked for evidence and I asked for her opinion on self-defence of the Faith. It is a pity we shall now remain ignorant despite the undoubted evangelical fervour of our silent guru.
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 12:57:37 +0100, "Don" <d...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >"Susan Williams" <SWilliams0717196...@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:r89om0p8mdqg8aaivjg6gegopa15v7teep@4ax.com... >> He's upset about abortion?
>Who mentioned abortion?
>Have you realised, Susan, that you bear the greatest responsibility for >repeating, repeating, repeating the assertion that "all non-Catholics must >die."
I'LL KEEP SOUNDING IT TO THE HOUSETOPS TILL THOSE WHO MAKE SUCH STATEMENTS RECEIVE JUSTICE!
Thus far, your reaction is to ask me where is my love.
>Maybe that is the way you want to be remembered?
>regards >Don
Here are more killers revealing themselves, damned Jesuit Don:...
Dear friends: Here we are again with an urgent appeal to you. Things have gotten so out of hand, that we wonder why even try. Viewing that the issues at hand involve much blood however, we have to ask again and try again. It is not a pleasant task, but we have to do it. Feast your eyes on the following very incredible posts. They represent a nightmare we have been facing for years. Some of the most amazing people capable of acts no criminal in jail can commit have been getting bolder and bolder in their posts on the newsgroups. Their boldness corresponds to the actions of those currently in leadership capacity in the United States and all over the world specifically in government, media, education and even religion. As events toward change move more and more rapidly they become more and more bold. Take a look at these taken from the Google Newsgroups Archives. We first meet a poster who is very very upset about something. What is he upset about?...
From: Shan (shankar...@yahoo.com) Subject: Re: #DEVIL SUSAN ANGRY COULDN'T PROVE ROME DEMANDS DEATHS OF ALL NON-CATHOLICS! Date: 2003-10-22 05:57:44 PST
I want you Harlot Bitch Whore SUSAN and your cohorts to die.
ALL ADVENTISTS, LATTER DAY MORONS AND JEHOVAH'S NUTNESSES ARE FROM SATAN AND MUST DIE.
Shan
[Look at what he is writing. You can see he is more than upset. What could have caused him to be this upset? Surely, you must be saying, he is just a little perturbed and doesn't mean what he is saying. Is that true? Watch now as he makes sure that everyone understands clearly what he is writing...]
From: Shan (shankar...@yahoo.com) Subject: Re: #DEVIL SUSAN ANGRY COULDN'T PROVE ROME DEMANDS DEATHS OF ALL NON-CATHOLICS! Date: 2003-10-20 14:59:55 PST
Hey Harlot Susan Whore, for your sake, just to please your evil nature, I am going to write it down in uppercase:
I THE UNDERSIGNED CONDEMN ALL ADVENTISTS, LATTER DAY MORONS AND JEHOVAH'S NUTNESS TO EXTERMINATION.
ALL OTHER PROTESTANTS ARE SPARED.
SHAN
[Just to please my evil nature he says, he writes words like these during our "new day" when terrorism has become a big issue. Now, isn't it better to joke about a bomb in an airport? Only just to please my nature? Notice how he says all other Protestants are spared? You must have guessed by now that he is Catholic, or rather, a Jesuit. That we define as a footsoldier of the Pope who even engages in subversion, and has the same mind as the Inquisitors of the Dark Ages. Actually we more specifically believe that he is a member of Opus Dei. Here are some more. Look at this very strange post in answer to another very caustic individual named "Alan"...]
> > Do you think devils are good pets or will they eat you someday?
Alan:
> Is this little devil called Ted McMillan ?
I know for a fact that Ted is not little. Not only is he so hung he can suck himself, but I can take it all the way down. Try that, jesuit!
In His Grace,
Susan
[This post has my name on it, but I did not write this post. The same one by the name of "Shan" most likely wrote it. Several times people like him have been without conscience enough to fabricate posts as if they were sent by me. In this case you can tell it is not me who posted by the email address. He knows that most would get caught on this. The email address shown there is SWilliams07171964...@hotmail.com. Notice the three (3) "I"s before the "@" sign? My actual email address has two (2) "I"s. Time and time again they showcase how unscrupulous they are and taunt us into thinking they have a real advantage. But we don't desire to be like them. They think their behavior merits more rewards for them in heaven. We know better! But by looking at their talents, and then sitting down and thinking, you would be able to more and more understand what the future is for the world.
Here he calls the name "Ted." He is referring to Ted McMillan, who is a good friend of mine who has had to face them like me. Ted is super-intelligent to the point where they constantly also call him insane, sick, etc., but leech on to his posts for dear emergency. They know his posts reveal the truth. Why else would they constantly trail his posts, calling them insane, and leave the rest of the internet neglected? I learned much of what I know through Ted McMillan.
It is always important for them to smother out what Brother Ted is saying. He reveals who they are and what they are up to. That's when he was posting on the newsgroups. He was usually the editor of my posts. You see and notice the boldness of the posts above, and can't imagine that to even be bold enough to post like that tells you they seem to know something about the times and about THE GOVERNMENT! Shan continues here below, in this case posting along with another one attacking us named "Alan" for the same reasons and on the same premise. What reasons are they?...] http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=c59f...
From: Susan Williams (SWilliams07171964...@hotmail.com) Subject: Re: #HAIRY-LEGGED SUSAN ACTUALLY MAN NAMED TED McMILLAN!! MAJOR expose! Date: 2004-01-21 15:22:23 PST
> Gasp. Ted must shortly be due to stump his way around the well worn track > again.
But Ted's lovely hot stump is almost as good as yours. At least one of the best Jesuits I've had. But we all know what you are really after.
<snip>
This post again was not written by me. Brother Ted revealed that they are Jesuits, or rather foot-soldiers of the Pope though they profess to come from different denominations or even claim to be Seventh-day Adventists: that is, INFILTRATORS. They therefore have to do anything possible to take people off the track that they really are Jesuits. The most popular tactic is to make jokes against the facts. Obviously the man posting above and then impersonating me is very angry. What could have caused him to get to this state? Amazingly it was because some friends of his made some other very bold posts. Here is his explanation of what we did that raised his dander. He here speaks to one claiming to be a Seventh-day Adventist named "Andrew" who also hates us no bounds:
Andrew, Search for "Sonny Maou" and you would know waht happened. I am sick and tired of reading attacks on everything relating to my faith, Catholicism.
I am not willing to tolerate it any longer for anybodies sake, include yours.
The ex-Archbishop of Canterburry was blamed recently for his remarks on Muslim leaders because he said they do not condemn terrorism. You, Andrew and other good Christians, are doing the same like Muslim leaders because you do not lift a finger to condemn those who are constantly attacking my faith beginning with this Sonny Maou who maybe a reincarnation of the harlot man/woman Susan, Cindy or whatever these idiots call themselves.
[Watch as Shan now accuses us of doing just what he has done in sending email that impersonates me...]
It is very easy to create a bogus e-mail and sign in as someone else so Susan maybe Sonny or anybody.
This situation will not be tolerated no matter what. Simply put, anybody who attacks my faith will receive response in ten folds. I am the first to criticize clergy but I will not permit anybody to attack the faith and go unpunished.
Shan
Notice his ancient or "inquisitor" style of speaking? As you can see here, he claims we attacked Rome. Is that true? Well what would it look like to you if we witnessed posters on the internet TELLING US THAT ALL NON-CATHOLICS SHOULD BE EXTERMINATED, and that it is "JUST BUSINESS" TO EXTERMINATE THEM? Would you be upset about that? Well some posters sent posts with those exact words and meaning. We, being non-Catholics no less, were very upset about it. We exposed those posters AND THE OTHERS WHO DEFENDED THEM. That is what Shan is angry about.
They first made many posts against the principles of the American Constitution and the document itself. They then also made posts against basic liberty. In this, they presented themselves as mere debaters claiming they had a right to their opinions while they were doing that. They referred to the American position as "REBELLION" and called true Americans "rebels." Some may realize that these words sound very
...
