This might interest the climage change deniers who believe that the
projected consequences of extant global warming are wrong. It also
might be of interest to people who actually know what they're talking
about in the climate change arena.

What we have here is a bifurcation, the difference between what
happens when scientists working in collaboration determine truth by
using computer modeling, and when corporate entities working in
proprietary secret (and thus lack peer review outside of their own
tight-nit bubble of corporate influence) use computer modeling.

Overwhelmingly the best modeling of reality results when all the
available information, data, and algorythemic processes are out in
the public domain, subject to scientific review. This is why computer
modeling of climate change consequences obtain probabistic ballpark
estimations of reality.

---
Email address: k.chelsea...@yahoo.com http://www.skeptictank.org/
Obama: Yes we can commit war crime atrocities and treason