Received: by 10.68.201.168 with SMTP id kb8mr5714654pbc.3.1335916432072;
        Tue, 01 May 2012 16:53:52 -0700 (PDT)
Path: r9ni121383pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed.datemas.de!news.datemas.de!not-for-mail
From: AGWFacts <AGWFa...@1800reality.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,talk.politics.misc,soc.retirement,alt.politics.democrats,alt.society.liberalism
Subject: Re: The how and why of the denial of human-caused climate change
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 17:53:47 -0600
Organization: I800reality
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <eqt0q7dtfhdrvfvj8q789qq5oiagapo9bt@4ax.com>
References: <bqelp7dcbffv9pondb6m61p0v5c9u4iv6f@4ax.com> <11468ae1-e257-4aa2-8c49-cab5cc2327d1@r13g2000vbg.googlegroups.com> <49qqp7llkou5ut2lqm9ln11e240rmbbsov@4ax.com> <jnjr7e$okd$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: AGWFa...@1800reality.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: news.datemas.de 6qU+QyfX6tRykSJO3frVkMR7TJuI0XyoqNxL80Vfnz7xy+9/Uw/AgPZBOPUQ3JJ00ByRBrM/Fc2JvdZ4qrb7LARY6AV8PnrCqVhxhPaeba3C4HyFyMKEptv96wFhKXGDSQzjtVl6bMb6s4+aF/UirvaEl9DuOt+wydEXyvFA72M=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@datemas.de
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 23:53:50 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:45:38 +0000 (UTC), 2966 Dead
<d...@gone.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 12:29:24 -0400, Wally W. wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 08:09:41 -0700 (PDT), Barbarian Mutual wrote:
> > 
> >>On Apr 27, 11:47 am, AGWFacts <AGWFa...@1800reality.com> wrote:
> >>> The how and why of the denial of human-caused climate change
> >>>
> >>> http://www.abc.net.au/environment/articles/2012/04/26/3489290.htm
> >>>
> >>> THE CLIMATE ISSUE IS A peculiar thing. Among climate experts, there's
> >>> an extraordinary level of agreement with 97 out of 100 climate
> >>> scientists agreeing that humans are causing global warming.

> >>Rightist deniers are never concerned with the truth.  They could care
> >>less what's causing climate change.

> > First, climates in all areas are always changing. Bringing attention to
> > a natural occurrence doesn't make it a problem.

"People have always died. Therefore muder is not a problem."

> That's always a favorite of denialists: change happens anyway.  It's the 
> RATE of change that's of concern.  Accelerating the rate of change can 
> lead to an ELE.  It would be foolish to bring an ELE down on our own 
> heads.

What is "an ELE?"

*CUTS*


--
Denialism: "The employment of rhetorical arguments to give the appearance
of legitimate debate where there is none."