Received: by 10.68.236.170 with SMTP id uv10mr3872821pbc.4.1333650823587;
        Thu, 05 Apr 2012 11:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
Path: r9ni22284pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!f5g2000vbt.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Liberal Here <liberalh...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: #Impeaching the Supreme Court Justices
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 11:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 82
Message-ID: <d14ddd66-848f-4c78-9707-be97a656752d@f5g2000vbt.googlegroups.com>
References: <jli0i0$eid$5@dont-email.me> <s_Odnfj0NdIxDuHSnZ2dnUVZ_ridnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <jli6fe$enb$2@dont-email.me> <MPG.29e6e327a4954bc9989c56@news.astraweb.com>
 <acydnU4JkKqj4eDSnZ2dnUVZ_oCdnZ2d@giganews.com> <jlkhal$8jf$2@dont-email.me>
 <lNqdnaQrGJJUVuDSnZ2dnUVZ_oadnZ2d@earthlink.com> <jlkilo$8k8$3@dont-email.me>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.135.227.164
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1333650823 12332 127.0.0.1 (5 Apr 2012 18:33:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 18:33:43 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: f5g2000vbt.googlegroups.com; posting-host=192.135.227.164; posting-account=M3yE7goAAABF01_g8BLg1mnqVuG8Nr7e
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 SURF1
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1;
 Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152;
 .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2),gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Apr 5, 12:53=A0pm, 2938 Dead <d...@gone.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 11:43:53 -0500, D=E4nk 42=D8 wrote:
> > On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:30:19 +0000, 2938 Dead wrote:
>
> >> On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 06:04:30 -0500, David Hartung wrote:
>
> >>> On 04/05/2012 12:01 AM, Gary DW wrote:
> >>>> In article<jli6fe$en...@dont-email.me>, 2938 Dead says...
>
> >>>>>> Let the purges begin! =A0And to think that just yesterday you were
> >>>>>> quacking about the need for an independent judiciary -- accusing m=
e
> >>>>>> and "rightards" in general of opposing this principle -- and today
> >>>>>> you are calling for judges who issue rulings you don't like to be
> >>>>>> removed from the bench.
>
> >>>>> I'm calling for the removal of any judges who openly defy the
> >>>>> constitution. =A0Judges acting in bad faith must be impeached.
>
> >>>> Agreed. =A0But such a thing is completely impossible with a 50/50
> >>>> divided America and Congress.
>
> >>>> I can see an asshole Pub House getting pissed and sending an
> >>>> impeachment of a USSC judge to the Senate just as a juvenile attempt
> >>>> at example =A0(cough, Clinton, cough) but no way could it get 2/3 of
> >>>> the Senate to convict in todays political environment.
>
> >>> The Clinton impeachment is recent proof that oru chacks and balances
> >>> actually work.
>
> >> So you approve of impeaching Slappy, Scaly and Roberto?
>
> > The idea behind lifetime terms for SCOTUS justices is to prevent them
> > from being influenced by contemporary politics. =A0Their job is to deci=
de
> > the constitutionality of laws, based on their own interpretation of the
> > Constitution, not the public's (and definitely not the interpretation o=
f
> > Canadians like you).
>
> Indeed, but in this cale, they were pre-influenced, fascist parodies of
> judges pressed on us by the GOP.

But the real fault lies with the democratic party for failing to
properly construct its message to the voter, its failure to oppose
reichwing legislation (example: the elimination of limits on ownership
of media),its willingness to support reichwing southern "democrats"
simply to maintain an apparent majority in both Houses of Congress...




>
> Or are you really going to argue that Slappy was the best of all possible
> choices for the Court? =A0Or that Scalie isn't openly defiant of judicial
> ethics?
>
>
>
> > If justices can be removed from office for making unpopular decisions,
> > all three branches of government become popularity contests, and the
> > check and balance of the court on the other two branches breaks down.
> > Geez, you are a retard.
>
> Go look up the requirements for impeachment, if you can't remember them
> from the last time you tried to impeach a politician you didn't like.
>
>
>
> > - - - - - - - - -
> >http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/818/zeppisafucktard01a.jpg/
>
> --
> =93Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution
> inevitable=94 -JFK
>
> --
> =93Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution
> inevitable=94 -JFK- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -