>b...@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) wrote:
>
>>In article <k6k98v0mf8sfhdqij...@4ax.com>,
>>BlackWater <b...@barrk.net> wrote:
>>>"Gandalf Grey" <ganda...@infectedmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,924497,00.html
>>>>
>>>>Longer war is likely, says US general
>>>
>>> So what ? WW-2 lasted four years, Korea three and
>>> Vietnam lasted about a decade. Whether THIS war
>>> takes one month or two - it's STILL gonna be one
>>> of our shortest wars ever.
>>
>>This is year 13. We've had forces there since 1990.
>
> Yea, but not enough to count. If you want to get
> really technical, the Korean was is still going
> on as well.
Yeah, well, judging from the controversy over the Confederate flag in
a number of southern states, the Civil War is still bubbling along,
too...
I'm going to make an educated guess and say that my prediction
is that more, and probably _many_ more, soldiers will be killed
in the occupation than are killed in the initial war.
Cheers,
-- Arne Langsetmo
Yeah? WHat's your guess on whether more US soldiers will be killed by
Iraqis or by "friendly fire"?
What's the ratio so far?
And how about a side guess about how many British soldiers the US will
kill?
> Only in Jessie Jacksons tiny little self-promoting mind.
> 'Red(neck) baiting' is his bread and butter.
Nah... More like in Sonny Perdue's mind.