What Perot is really after. (was Re: Perot Again!)

[STEPHEN TICE]

{ This posting sent to talk.politics.misc on 16 Sep -- Sdt }

In article <BuMsq...@apollo.hp.com>,
nels...@apollo.hp.com (Peter Nelson) writes...

> Anyway, after
> quitting before it's unlikely that he would be taken seriously
> by anyone but a handful of fanatic-fringe types so I doubt he
> would have much effect at all on the election.

Wishfull thinking Peter. Perot has said he'll reenter if the *50*
state coordinators ask him to. With the federal budget battle coming
up, can you doubt that this isn't the intended target of his re-entry?

What is Perot and the Movement after?
Simple, `fiscal responsibility' in our government.

So are you sure we're even in the same ball game?

Moreso I suggest that it's in the democrats best interest to play
along with us for a while -- if it's not too "scary" that is.

/ \
( Stephen D. Tice | Fooled me once, shame on you )
> -- S -- Fooled me twice, shame on me <
( Arlington Texas | Bye Bye Bushlips )
\ /

[Peter Nelson]

Recently I posted . . .

# Anyway, after quitting before it's unlikely that he [Perot] would be
# taken seriously by anyone but a handful of fanatic-fringe types

And B64...@UTARLG.UTA.EDU (STEPHEN TICE) responded . . .

> Wishfull thinking Peter. Perot has said he'll reenter if the *50*
> state coordinators ask him to. With the federal budget battle coming
> up, can you doubt that this isn't the intended target of his re-entry?
>
> What is Perot and the Movement after?
> Simple, `fiscal responsibility' in our government.
>
> So are you sure we're even in the same ball game?
>
> Moreso I suggest that it's in the democrats best interest to play
> along with us for a while -- if it's not too "scary" that is.

I don't think I need to add anything to this.

---peter