#Pick-a-Veep for Mittens

[2960 Dead]

http://cdn.svcs.c2.uclick.com/c2/412c09f0662a012f2fdb00163e41dd5b



--
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution
inevitable” -JFK





--
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution
inevitable” -JFK

[Dänk 42Ø]

On 04/12/2012 06:33 PM, 2960 Dead quacked:
> Pick-a-Veep for Mittens

How 'bout some sleazy wife-cheatin' pile of dog shit who embezzles
campaign funds to pay off his pregnant mistress?

Oh, wait, that would be John Edwards... Funny thing is that you and
your fellow leftards had no problem with him being a heartbeat away from
the presidency.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
"When they had once got it by heart the Obamatards developed a great
liking for this maxim, and often as they sat their fat asses smoking
crack and watching Oprah they would all start bleating 'Obaama good,
Buush baad! Obaama good, Buush baad!' and keep it up for hours on end,
never growing tired of it."
-- Animal Farm (rectified edition)

[2960 Dead]

On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:25:02 -0600, Dänk 42Ø wrote:

> On 04/12/2012 06:33 PM, 2960 Dead quacked:
> > Pick-a-Veep for Mittens
>
> How 'bout some sleazy wife-cheatin' pile of dog shit who embezzles
> campaign funds to pay off his pregnant mistress?
>
> Oh, wait, that would be John Edwards... Funny thing is that you and
> your fellow leftards had no problem with him being a heartbeat away from
> the presidency.

Really? I haven't run into any Democrats lately who want to see him run
in 2016. Have you?

Of course you haven't.

And you really don't want to play the game of comparascandal. The GOP
are far more corrupt.

>
> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
> "When they had once got it by heart the Obamatards developed a great
> liking for this maxim, and often as they sat their fat asses smoking
> crack and watching Oprah they would all start bleating 'Obaama good,
> Buush baad! Obaama good, Buush baad!' and keep it up for hours on end,
> never growing tired of it."
> -- Animal Farm (rectified edition)

[Lee Curtis]

Dänk 42Ø wrote:

> On 04/12/2012 06:33 PM, 2960 Dead quacked:
> > Pick-a-Veep for Mittens
>
> How 'bout some sleazy wife-cheatin' pile of dog shit who embezzles
> campaign funds to pay off his pregnant mistress?

How cheating whoremonger and "family values" champion
David Vitter? A least Sanford and Craig and Edwards had
the common sense to drop out of politics when they were
outted.

And then there is Newt Gringrich........

[lsrlts]

On 4/13/2012 11:13 AM, Lee Curtis is a ...cheating whoremonger...

[Dänk 42Ø]

On 04/13/2012 11:08 AM, 2960 Dead quacked:

> On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:25:02 -0600, Dänk 42Ø wrote:
>
>> On 04/12/2012 06:33 PM, 2960 Dead quacked:
>> > Pick-a-Veep for Mittens
>>
>> How 'bout some sleazy wife-cheatin' pile of dog shit who embezzles
>> campaign funds to pay off his pregnant mistress?
>>
>> Oh, wait, that would be John Edwards... Funny thing is that you and
>> your fellow leftards had no problem with him being a heartbeat away from
>> the presidency.
>
> Really? I haven't run into any Democrats lately who want to see him run
> in 2016. Have you?

But you supported him in 2004. And that other guy, the millionaire with
the plastic hair and limousine who claimed to represent the interests of
the working class. Al Kerry? John Bore?

> And you really don't want to play the game of comparascandal. The GOP
> are far more corrupt.

I never said Republicans weren't corrupt. Whether they are more corrupt
than Democrats is a philosophical question, with no real answer
(Democrats may just be better at not getting caught, which can hardly be
considered a virtue).

As usual, you offer a false dichotomy of Hitler vs. Stalin, Giant Douche
vs. Turd Sandwich, as if one is superior to the other.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
"I wasn't born with enough middle fingers. I don't need to choose a side."
-- Marilyn Manson

[2960 Dead]

To a Republican like Danky, morals are just something you inflict on
other people.

[2960 Dead]

On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:50:54 -0600, Dänk 42Ø wrote:

> On 04/13/2012 11:08 AM, 2960 Dead quacked:
>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:25:02 -0600, Dänk 42Ø wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/12/2012 06:33 PM, 2960 Dead quacked:
>>> > Pick-a-Veep for Mittens
>>>
>>> How 'bout some sleazy wife-cheatin' pile of dog shit who embezzles
>>> campaign funds to pay off his pregnant mistress?
>>>
>>> Oh, wait, that would be John Edwards... Funny thing is that you and
>>> your fellow leftards had no problem with him being a heartbeat away
>>> from the presidency.
>>
>> Really? I haven't run into any Democrats lately who want to see him
>> run in 2016. Have you?
>
> But you supported him in 2004. And that other guy, the millionaire with
> the plastic hair and limousine who claimed to represent the interests of
> the working class. Al Kerry? John Bore?

Sure I did. But nobody knew about his mistress--hell, HE didn't know
about her yet.

Of course, you support the likes of Newt, who is far worse at catting
around on sick wives, or Vitter, who is just plain tacky with his hookers
and diapers fetish. So I'm really unimpressed with your pseudo-moralistic
mewlings.

You may go back to praising Charlie Manson now.

>
>
>> And you really don't want to play the game of comparascandal. The GOP
>> are far more corrupt.
>
> I never said Republicans weren't corrupt. Whether they are more corrupt
> than Democrats is a philosophical question, with no real answer
> (Democrats may just be better at not getting caught, which can hardly be
> considered a virtue).
>
> As usual, you offer a false dichotomy of Hitler vs. Stalin, Giant Douche
> vs. Turd Sandwich, as if one is superior to the other.
>
> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = "I wasn't born with enough middle
> fingers. I don't need to choose a side." -- Marilyn Manson

[Steve]

On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:20:07 +0000 (UTC), 2960 Dead <de...@gone.com>
wrote:

>On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:13:12 -0500, Lee Curtis wrote:
>
>> Dänk 42Ø wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/12/2012 06:33 PM, 2960 Dead quacked:
>>> > Pick-a-Veep for Mittens
>>>
>>> How 'bout some sleazy wife-cheatin' pile of dog shit who embezzles
>>> campaign funds to pay off his pregnant mistress?
>>
>>
>> How cheating whoremonger and "family values" champion
>> David Vitter? A least Sanford and Craig and Edwards had the common sense
>> to drop out of politics when they were outted.
>>
>> And then there is Newt Gringrich........
>
>To a Republican like Danky, morals are just something you inflict on
>other people.
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution
>inevitable” -JFK

That's from David (Zepp) Jamieson who apparently refused to
allow the woman he claims to still be married to use of his
Internet account, and then when she got fined for broken tail
lights and failure to licence the family pets, he refused to
help her pay the fines and then after a decade, she was forced
to do community service.

The truth may be that Zepp has been lying about still being
married to her and instead, she left him for reasons Zepp doesn't
want to admit.

What's porky hiding here?

[Matt]

On Apr 12, 6:33 pm, 2960 Dead <d...@gone.com> wrote:
> http://cdn.svcs.c2.uclick.com/c2/412c09f0662a012f2fdb00163e41dd5b

Rather than play the game, or argue, I'll take the question seriously.

Were I Mitt, my choice would be Jon Huntsman. He's a moderate, which
might
win you some center votes. He's from the Mid West which might help a
bit.

Of course, he's also another Mormon, which would hurt. Okay...

Jeb Bush is an option, although I think he hurts the ticket more than
helps it.
But at least there's some name recognition and the whole Bush
background thing.

I think we can rule out Santorum, Perry, Cain, Bachman and Palin.

What Mitt needs is someone that can help him with the popular vote,
help him
with the moderates, and help him with the fact that he's stiff and
clueless. Since the
VP technically does NOT have to be eligible to be President (I'm happy
to explain
why to people that don't understand) I would go with Ahnold. No,
seriously, I would.

Matt

[MattB.]

What about Ron Paul?

[2960 Dead]

On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:21:35 -0700, Matt wrote:

> On Apr 12, 6:33 pm, 2960 Dead <d...@gone.com> wrote:
>> http://cdn.svcs.c2.uclick.com/c2/412c09f0662a012f2fdb00163e41dd5b
>
> Rather than play the game, or argue, I'll take the question seriously.
>
> Were I Mitt, my choice would be Jon Huntsman. He's a moderate, which
> might
> win you some center votes. He's from the Mid West which might help a
> bit.
>
> Of course, he's also another Mormon, which would hurt. Okay...
>
> Jeb Bush is an option, although I think he hurts the ticket more than
> helps it.
> But at least there's some name recognition and the whole Bush background
> thing.

The Bush brand is still ruined. Bush Sr was mediocre, and Bush Jr was an
unmitigated disaster.

>
> I think we can rule out Santorum, Perry, Cain, Bachman and Palin.
>

In a sane election season, yes. This one...

> What Mitt needs is someone that can help him with the popular vote, help
> him
> with the moderates, and help him with the fact that he's stiff and
> clueless. Since the
> VP technically does NOT have to be eligible to be President (I'm happy
> to explain
> why to people that don't understand) I would go with Ahnold. No,
> seriously, I would.
>
> Matt

Arnie isn't eligible because he was born in Austria. The twelfth
amendment clearly states, "But no person constitutionally ineligible to
the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of
the United States."

My guess is the GOP will go for someone they can afford to throw away on
a hopeless campaign. Bobby Jindal, perhaps, or Meg Whitman.

[Matt]

Try to look at it politically. Mitt already has the right-wing. He
needs the
center to win. Ron Paul doesn't give him that. Whether right or wrong,
he's
perceived as an extremist.

Matt

[Matt]

On Apr 13, 7:22 pm, 2960 Dead <d...@gone.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:21:35 -0700, Matt wrote:
> > On Apr 12, 6:33 pm, 2960 Dead <d...@gone.com> wrote:
> >>http://cdn.svcs.c2.uclick.com/c2/412c09f0662a012f2fdb00163e41dd5b
>
> > Rather than play the game, or argue, I'll take the question seriously.
>
> > Were I Mitt, my choice would be Jon Huntsman. He's a moderate, which
> > might
> > win you some center votes. He's from the Mid West which might help a
> > bit.
>
> > Of course, he's also another Mormon, which would hurt. Okay...
>
> > Jeb Bush is an option, although I think he hurts the ticket more than
> > helps it.
> > But at least there's some name recognition and the whole Bush background
> > thing.
>
> The Bush brand is still ruined.  Bush Sr was mediocre, and Bush Jr was an
> unmitigated disaster.

Jeb is still.... semi-untainted. No, Florida doesn't like him, but
they will hold their
noses and vote for him. I'm thinking more of the center of the
country. Mitt needs
to win some key states. Texas is given, the breadbasket is given. But
places like
Colorado and Michigan are not. Pennsylvania, even.

>
> > I think we can rule out Santorum, Perry, Cain, Bachman and Palin.
>
> In a sane election season, yes.  This one...

Granted, but I don't think Mitt is stupid. He just can't seem to avoid
saying stupid
things.

>
> > What Mitt needs is someone that can help him with the popular vote, help
> > him
> > with the moderates, and help him with the fact that he's stiff and
> > clueless. Since the
> > VP technically does NOT have to be eligible to be President (I'm happy
> > to explain
> > why to people that don't understand) I would go with Ahnold. No,
> > seriously, I would.
>
> > Matt
>
> Arnie isn't eligible because he was born in Austria.  The twelfth
> amendment clearly states, "But no person constitutionally ineligible to
> the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of
> the United States."

This is still unchallenged. Arnie could be prseident, he cannot be
ELECTED
to president. That's my point, and why I believe he could run. He
cannot run
FOR President.

>
> My guess is the GOP will go for someone they can afford to throw away on
> a hopeless campaign.  Bobby Jindal, perhaps, or Meg Whitman.

Whitman already lost and showed herself to be incapable of the fight.
I really
did think better of her. Jindal, maybe. Or maybe Rubio.

Matt

>
> --
> “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution
> inevitable” -JFK
>
> --
> “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution

> inevitable” -JFK- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

[MattB]

That is true.

I do agree with you that Rubio is a possibility. That would do
much for Romeny.


>
>Matt

[2960 Dead]

The Obama campaign will just simply say "A Bush is a Bush is a Bush" and
they'll be running against George W.

>
>
>> > I think we can rule out Santorum, Perry, Cain, Bachman and Palin.
>>
>> In a sane election season, yes.  This one...
>
> Granted, but I don't think Mitt is stupid. He just can't seem to avoid
> saying stupid things.
>

And his party is largely insane right now.

>
>> > What Mitt needs is someone that can help him with the popular vote,
>> > help him
>> > with the moderates, and help him with the fact that he's stiff and
>> > clueless. Since the
>> > VP technically does NOT have to be eligible to be President (I'm
>> > happy to explain
>> > why to people that don't understand) I would go with Ahnold. No,
>> > seriously, I would.
>>
>> > Matt
>>
>> Arnie isn't eligible because he was born in Austria.  The twelfth
>> amendment clearly states, "But no person constitutionally ineligible to
>> the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of
>> the United States."
>
> This is still unchallenged. Arnie could be prseident, he cannot be
> ELECTED
> to president. That's my point, and why I believe he could run. He cannot
> run
> FOR President.
>

I know that disingenuity is 9/10s of the law, that that's a stretch. The
VP technically isn't elected anyway.

[Dänk 42Ø]

On 04/13/2012 01:20 PM, 2960 Dead quacked:

> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:13:12 -0500, Lee Curtis wrote:
>
>> Dänk 42Ø wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/12/2012 06:33 PM, 2960 Dead quacked:
>>>> Pick-a-Veep for Mittens
>>>
>>> How 'bout some sleazy wife-cheatin' pile of dog shit who embezzles
>>> campaign funds to pay off his pregnant mistress?
>>
>>
>> How cheating whoremonger and "family values" champion
>> David Vitter? A least Sanford and Craig and Edwards had the common sense
>> to drop out of politics when they were outted.
>>
>> And then there is Newt Gringrich........
>
> To a Republican like Danky, morals are just something you inflict on
> other people.

Please quote me as saying that I am a Republican. You complain about me
assigning "fake" positions to you, so don't assign them to me.

You already know that I spent seven years calling for Emperor Bush's
impeachment -- even voting for the goddamn Democraps in 2006 in the
deluded beLIEf they would impeach the fucker if they won control of
Congress. Since they refused to impeach him, I have no further use for
them -- which can hardly be construed as support for the Republicans.

You, however, were all to willing to throw your "principles" under the
proverbial bus -- bleating support for Nancy Pelosi's decision to move
impeachment off the table to make room for a more important farm subsidy
bill. At that point I realized that the Democrats were aiding and
abetting the crimes of the Republicans, which is why I cast my vote for
the Green candidate in 2008.

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/818/zeppisafucktard01a.jpg/

[Matt]

Maybe. But, of course, a lot of people like Bush. Don't ask my why.

>
> >> > I think we can rule out Santorum, Perry, Cain, Bachman and Palin.
>
> >> In a sane election season, yes.  This one...
>
> > Granted, but I don't think Mitt is stupid. He just can't seem to avoid
> > saying stupid things.
>
> And his party is largely insane right now.

This, sadly, is true. It used to be a very respectable party. I even
agreed
with a fair number of their planks. Then Goldwater came along, and
Reagan
put the icing ont he cake.

> >> > What Mitt needs is someone that can help him with the popular vote,
> >> > help him
> >> > with the moderates, and help him with the fact that he's stiff and
> >> > clueless. Since the
> >> > VP technically does NOT have to be eligible to be President (I'm
> >> > happy to explain
> >> > why to people that don't understand) I would go with Ahnold. No,
> >> > seriously, I would.
>
> >> > Matt
>
> >> Arnie isn't eligible because he was born in Austria.  The twelfth
> >> amendment clearly states, "But no person constitutionally ineligible to
> >> the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of
> >> the United States."
>
> > This is still unchallenged. Arnie could be prseident, he cannot be
> > ELECTED
> > to president. That's my point, and why I believe he could run. He cannot
> > run
> > FOR President.
>
> I know that disingenuity is 9/10s of the law, that that's a stretch.  The
> VP technically isn't elected anyway.

As I said, it has never been challenged. Besides, Arnie is awfully old
at this
point, he MIGHT have been around at the time the Constitution was
adopted,
and that supercedes the natural born citizen clause.

Either way, I think Romney does need some kind of star power. Who? I
have
no idea. Ted Nugent? LOL

Matt

[Dänk 42Ø]

On 04/14/2012 07:49 AM, Matt wrote:
> On Apr 13, 7:46 pm, 2960 Dead<d...@gone.com> quacked:

>> The Obama campaign will just simply say "A Bush is a Bush is a Bush" and
>> they'll be running against George W.
>
> Maybe. But, of course, a lot of people like Bush. Don't ask my why.

From my own observation, I've noticed a tendency among Republicans and
Teabaggers to pretend George W. Bush and his presidency never existed.
I attended a Tea Party rally a few years ago, and Bush's name was not
uttered once -- he had become an unperson.

If fact, I was surprised to hear Mitt Romney refer to him during a
debate a few months ago: The other candidates seemed stunned and upset
at the prospect of being burdened with his legacy during the rest of the
campaign, but they managed to get things under control and he hasn't
been mentioned since.

A recent thread on this group was about which candidate Bush was going
to endorse: Since his endorsement would be a kiss of death, I don't
think he's going to come out of hiding to endorse anyone, but that won't
stop Democrats from claiming he made an endorsement (whoever winds up
being Obama's rival, which is probably Romney).

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

"Syme had vanished. A morning came, and he was missing from work: a few
thoughtless people commented on his absence. On the next day nobody
mentioned him. On the third day Winston went into the vestibule of the
Records Department to look at the notice-board. One of the notices
carried a printed list of the members of the Chess Committee, of whom
Syme had been one. It looked almost exactly as it had looked before --
nothing had been crossed out -- but it was one name shorter. It was
enough. Syme had ceased to exist: he had never existed."

-- 1984

[Liberal Here]

On Apr 13, 3:20 pm, 2960 Dead <d...@gone.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:13:12 -0500, Lee Curtis wrote:
> > Dänk 42Ø wrote:
>
> >> On 04/12/2012 06:33 PM, 2960 Dead quacked:
> >> > Pick-a-Veep for Mittens
>
> >> How 'bout some sleazy wife-cheatin' pile of dog shit who embezzles
> >> campaign funds to pay off his pregnant mistress?
>
> >     How cheating whoremonger and "family values" champion
> > David Vitter? A least Sanford and Craig and Edwards had the common sense
> > to drop out of politics when they were outted.
>
> >     And then there is Newt Gringrich........
>
> To a Republican like Danky, morals are just something you inflict on
> other people.

Yes. Recall FDR actually had his mistress in the White House. While
conservatives wanted to be allies of Hitler and do business with
Imperial Japan, FDR did all he could to rebuild the US military. Then
he fought a two-front war, and maintained a multi-nation alliance to
defeat Germany and Japan.

Nixon, Reagan, Bush 1, and Bush 1/2 were morally pure as candidates
and presidents, but were they successful as presidents as measured by
the nation being better off as they left office compared to when they
entered office.

[2960 Dead]

On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:28:09 -0700, Liberal Here wrote:

> On Apr 13, 3:20 pm, 2960 Dead <d...@gone.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:13:12 -0500, Lee Curtis wrote:
>> > Dänk 42Ø wrote:
>>
>> >> On 04/12/2012 06:33 PM, 2960 Dead quacked:
>> >> > Pick-a-Veep for Mittens
>>
>> >> How 'bout some sleazy wife-cheatin' pile of dog shit who embezzles
>> >> campaign funds to pay off his pregnant mistress?
>>
>> >     How cheating whoremonger and "family values" champion
>> > David Vitter? A least Sanford and Craig and Edwards had the common
>> > sense to drop out of politics when they were outted.
>>
>> >     And then there is Newt Gringrich........
>>
>> To a Republican like Danky, morals are just something you inflict on
>> other people.
>
> Yes. Recall FDR actually had his mistress in the White House. While
> conservatives wanted to be allies of Hitler and do business with
> Imperial Japan, FDR did all he could to rebuild the US military. Then he
> fought a two-front war, and maintained a multi-nation alliance to defeat
> Germany and Japan.
>
> Nixon, Reagan, Bush 1, and Bush 1/2 were morally pure as candidates and
> presidents, but were they successful as presidents as measured by the
> nation being better off as they left office compared to when they
> entered office.

Eisenhower, the last decent Republican in the White House, had a
mistress.