Message from discussion
Sea Levels Rising Faster Than Predicted
Received: by 10.68.190.104 with SMTP id gp8mr6389448pbc.4.1341090914443;
Sat, 30 Jun 2012 14:15:14 -0700 (PDT)
Path: l9ni3612pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!volia.net!news2.volia.net!feed-A.news.volia.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us>
Newsgroups: alt.politics,alt.atheism,talk.politics.misc,alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Sea Levels Rising Faster Than Predicted
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 16:15:47 -0500
Lines: 98
Message-ID: <j3ruu75lo7a8jufp285ik2ncnj1slhaa7h@4ax.com>
References: <0a82eda8-e1de-45da-a921-e723c3843b1d@t8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <TsSdnTt6mNhnjnLSnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <g5cuu7l7vjrab0uq2kohu0gm8bp3i1554f@4ax.com> <XnsA0827C594700AOccupierDumber@88.198.244.100> <8nhuu7ppgumlcs27oq1oplvpjhl9mq3476@4ax.com> <XnsA0828C2A0E65OccupierDumber@88.198.244.100>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: individual.net 7AhXLVFHYvfvY4dQ6ziStAdi+zZ0qRn72o3FtWJoM31hkwTiYzfcR6UIJn/HlYWwfU
Cancel-Lock: sha1:BfIzB44oMMTkdoSmxg1JLI8JmdU=
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.00.32.1200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 18:46:50 +0000 (UTC), "First.Post"
<OccupierDumberThanD...@invalid.org> wrote in alt.atheism:
>Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote in
>news:8nhuu7ppgumlcs27oq1oplvpjhl9mq3476@4ax.com:
>
>> On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 17:13:33 +0000 (UTC), "First.Post"
>> <OccupierDumberThanD...@invalid.org> wrote in alt.atheism:
>>
>>>Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote in
>>>news:g5cuu7l7vjrab0uq2kohu0gm8bp3i1554f@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 09:58:02 -0500, David Hartung
><da...@hotmaiil.com>
>>>> wrote in alt.atheism:
>>>>
>>>>>On 06/30/2012 09:44 AM, my fake smile wrote:
>>>>>> David Hartung <da...@hotmaiil.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If the earth is actually absorbing more heat than it emits, then
>>>>>>> the globe is indeed warming. The article goes on to blame
>>>>>>> anthropogenic greenhouse gases for this warming. That is where
>they
>>>>>>> lose me, at least for now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "The buildup of carbon dioxide causes radiation from our solar
>>>>>> system's sun to become trapped in our atmosphere. This radiation is
>>>>>> in the form of intense heat"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>https://sites.google.com/site/changethepipeforabetterfuture/researc
>>>>>> h
>>>>>
>>>>>I fully understand the concept of the greenhouse effect, in fact it
>is
>>>>>that effect which makes life possible on earth. I am simply not
>>>>>convinced that CO2 is the big bad boogyman everyone is cp;aiming it
>to
>>>>>be.
>>>>>
>>>>>Ask yourself this question. What "greenhouse gas" causes the majority
>>>>>of the earth's greenhouse effect?
>>>>
>>>> Your question shows that you do not understand the problem.
>>>>
>>>> Any significant change in any greenhouse gas will change the
>>>> temperature of earth. The balance that we are seeing changed at the
>>>> moment is relatively small compared to the history of the earth, but
>>>> it is a major change for human life. Scientists know how effective
>>>> each greenhouse gas is and they know how much those are changing over
>>>> recent time. You seem to be cherrypicking the data so you can ignore
>>>> the overall pattern.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Can you show us the formula that proves anthropogenic global warming.
>>
>> Did you think your question makes sense?
>>
>>>Should be simple for such a goddamned genius like yourself.
>>
>> I guess you don't have respect for scientists because it appears that
>> you prefer to believe the lies of science-hating frauds.
>>
>>>So please give us the formula showing XCO2 caused by man = YDegrees in
>>>global temperature increase.
>>
>> Carbon Dioxide is part of the change, but the amount has been
>> calculated.
>>
>>>Oh thqat's right, you can;t because it's still just a hair brained
>>>theory.
>>
>> Only for science deniers. People who do not worship ignorance and
>> right-wing lies knows that humans are changing the climate.
>>
>>>Now come back with your typical insults and comments that prove
>nothing.
>>
>> You have chosen to mock science on a tool that exists because of
>> science. I cannot make more of a fool of you than you have done
>> yourself.
>>
>
>Sccording to the scientists:
>CO2 accounts for 3.618% of the total greenhouse effect of which man is
>responsible for 0.117% .
Source?
>Total human greenhouse gas contributions
>add up to about 0.28% of the greenhouse effect.
>95.000% of the total greenhouse gas effect is caused by water vapor.
>
>Effectively man has virtually no effect on the climate.
>You don't even have your own "science" right.
>Now run along and spred your propaganda someplace where folks are stupid
>enoughb to buy into it.