Terrorism and Taylor Swift

Michael Ejercito

unread,

Apr 3, 2011, 5:19:51 PM4/3/11

to

Imagine, for a moment, that there was this nithing who was obsessed
with Taylor Swift, a country singer. So obsessed that he jacks a quart
of pecker snot every day while looking at her picture. One day, he
decides to take the "relationship" to the next level by sending her a
letter that demands sex from her or else he will blow up a building
full of people. She does not dignify the letter with a response, and
the next day a high-rise goes up in a blast fueled by ammonium nitrate
and fuel oil, killing hundreds of people. Swift receives a letter from
the nithing again, stating that unless she has sex with him, more
buildings will be blown up and more and more people will be killed.
And sure enough, more and more buildings are blown up, and the death
toll from this campaign by a nithing to have sex with Taylor Swift
reaches the thousands.

So who would be guilty of these bombings?

Unfortunately, there are too many people who would say Taylor Swift
would be guilty of such bombings.

This is exactly what happened when twelve U.N. workers were killed
by protesters who overran a U.N. compound in Mazar-i-Sharif,
Afghanistan. The casus belli was the burning of a Quran by the
Reverend Terry Jones, a Florida pastor. And many people blamed Jones
for those deaths, as shown in the comments section of this New York
Times Article.

http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2011/04/02/world/asia/02afghanistan.html?permid=183#comment183

http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2011/04/02/world/asia/02afghanistan.html?permid=185#comment185

http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2011/04/02/world/asia/02afghanistan.html?permid=189#comment189

http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2011/04/02/world/asia/02afghanistan.html?permid=192#comment192

http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2011/04/02/world/asia/02afghanistan.html?permid=203#comment203

http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2011/04/02/world/asia/02afghanistan.html?permid=208#comment208

http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2011/04/02/world/asia/02afghanistan.html?permid=215#comment215

http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2011/04/02/world/asia/02afghanistan.html?permid=223#comment223

http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2011/04/02/world/asia/02afghanistan.html?permid=231#comment231

http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2011/04/02/world/asia/02afghanistan.html?permid=243#comment243

http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2011/04/02/world/asia/02afghanistan.html?permid=250#comment250

If Swift refused to have sex with someone who threatened to blow up
buildings full of people if she refused, each and every one of those
commenters would blame her for such bombings.

To be sure, Terry Jones's burning of the Quran was offensive and
indecent. It defined the enemy too widely. For example, if people
protesting American policies burned an American flag (as opposed to
effigies of officials who supported the policies), it would incite
Americans to oppose their cause, or at least deter them from
supporting it.

There is another example of "defining the enemy too widely" that
happened over twenty years ago. There had been a protest about AIDS
where some homosexual protesters disrupted a Mass at St. Patrick's
Cathedral.

http://www.nytimes.com/1989/12/11/nyregion/111-held-in-st-patrick-s-aids-protest.html

Disrupting the Mass alienated decent Catholics and other decent
people who, while not entirely supportive of the gay agenda,
sympathized with them on this issue.

And yet was this act to blame for future incidents of gay bashing?
Were the people who disrupted the Mass guilty of the murder of Matthew
Shepard?

There is nothing more effective in encouraging evil than appeasing
it. Indeed, gay rights groups in London OPPOSED a gay pride event in
the East End because it might offend Muslims, nevermind that the
organizers never intended to challenge Islam or Muslims, only to
preach a message of peaceful coexistence.

http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/london-pride-not/

And these sand Nazis- for there is no more an accurate description
for these nithings than this- always find excuses to wage their jihad.
From Israel, to Danish cartoons, to a film, it is always the same end
result. Similarly, Hitler claimed that "provocations" by Poland were
his reason for the invasion, but many people in their seventies and
eighties, with tattoos on their arms, can attest to Hitler's
motivations.

If the Holocaust or 9/11 ever taught us anything, it is that evil
must be confronted, not appeased.

Michael

Phlip

unread,

Apr 3, 2011, 5:56:35 PM4/3/11

to

Blah blah blah, whatever. We can think of many moral situations
slightly different from the actual one, and play with them here.

For example, imagine if Michelle Obama had shaken hands with a
misogynistic Muslim, and riots resulted. Who has the far-right ALREADY
declared would be at fault?

> If the Holocaust or 9/11 ever taught us anything, it is that evil
> must be confronted, not appeased.

Which is why we spent more money investigating Bill Clinton's blow
jobs than investigating 9/11?

Dug

unread,

Apr 3, 2011, 6:10:02 PM4/3/11

to

"Phlip" <phli...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:b8831ed2-5f72-4a20...@f6g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

************************
But no one was killed for either of the above actions or inactions, unlike
in the instant case when muslime fucks slaughter dozens of people because
someone burned their holey book of hatred.

FOAD.

The Revd

unread,

Apr 3, 2011, 8:09:59 PM4/3/11

to

It taught YOU to suck jew rectums, gook.

The Peeler

unread,

Apr 3, 2011, 6:25:23 PM4/3/11

to

On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 18:09:59 -0600, The Retard, the resident psychopath of
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
wrote:

>>for these nithings than this- always find excuses to wage their jihad.
>>From Israel, to Danish cartoons, to a film, it is always the same end
>>result. Similarly, Hitler claimed that "provocations" by Poland were
>>his reason for the invasion, but many people in their seventies and
>>eighties, with tattoos on their arms, can attest to Hitler's
>>motivations.
>>
>> If the Holocaust or 9/11 ever taught us anything, it is that evil
>>must be confronted, not appeased.
>
> It taught YOU to suck jew rectums, gook.

Quite the retard with the limited vocabulary you are, eh, The Retard?

And yeah: you suck and you are an asshole! <BG>

--
Retarded, subnormal and extremely proud of it: our resident psychopath, The
Retard!

Phlip

unread,

Apr 3, 2011, 6:26:48 PM4/3/11

to

On Apr 3, 3:10 pm, "Dug" <andxor...@gggmail.com> wrote:

> But no one was killed for either of the above actions or inactions, unlike
> in the instant case when muslime fucks slaughter dozens of people because
> someone burned their holey book of hatred.
>
> FOAD.

Welcome to America, were "rugged individualism" means some folks are
afraid of their own shadow.

5950 Dead, 1093 since 1/20/09

unread,

Apr 3, 2011, 6:34:07 PM4/3/11

to

On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 14:19:51 -0700, Michael Ejercito wrote:

> Imagine, for a moment, that there was this nithing who was obsessed with
> Taylor Swift, a country singer. So obsessed that he jacks a quart of
> pecker snot every day while looking at her picture. One day, he decides
> to take the "relationship" to the next level by sending her a letter
> that demands sex from her or else he will blow up a building full of
> people. She does not dignify the letter with a response, and the next
> day a high-rise goes up in a blast fueled by ammonium nitrate and fuel
> oil, killing hundreds of people. Swift receives a letter from the
> nithing again, stating that unless she has sex with him, more buildings
> will be blown up and more and more people will be killed. And sure
> enough, more and more buildings are blown up, and the death toll from
> this campaign by a nithing to have sex with Taylor Swift reaches the
> thousands.
>
> So who would be guilty of these bombings?
>
> Unfortunately, there are too many people who would say Taylor Swift
> would be guilty of such bombings.

Let me get this straight: you're saying that Terry Jones caused the
attacks because he demanded that Harmid Karzai have sex with him and
Karzai refused?

--
Information has never been so free. Even in authoritarian countries
information networks are helping people discover new facts and making
governments more accountable.- US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton,
January 21, 2010

The Revd

unread,

Apr 3, 2011, 8:34:41 PM4/3/11

to

On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 00:25:23 +0200, Roman The Illiterate Grik Foreskin
Peeler <slapping@themoronicGrikinvalid> wrote:

>On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 18:09:59 -0600, The Retard, the resident psychopath of
>sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
>wrote:
>
>>>for these nithings than this- always find excuses to wage their jihad.
>>>From Israel, to Danish cartoons, to a film, it is always the same end
>>>result. Similarly, Hitler claimed that "provocations" by Poland were
>>>his reason for the invasion, but many people in their seventies and
>>>eighties, with tattoos on their arms, can attest to Hitler's
>>>motivations.
>>>
>>> If the Holocaust or 9/11 ever taught us anything, it is that evil
>>>must be confronted, not appeased.
>>
>> It taught YOU to suck jew rectums, gook.
>
>Quite the retard with the limited vocabulary you are, eh, The Retard?
>
>And yeah: you suck and you are an asshole! <BG>

Quite the illiterate Grik asshole, aren't you, eh Pantahose?
You suck jew rectums and you are a Grik piece of skata!
<Buggered Grik>

The Peeler

unread,

Apr 3, 2011, 6:44:48 PM4/3/11

to

On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 18:34:41 -0600, The Retard, the resident psychopath of

sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
wrote:

>>>> If the Holocaust or 9/11 ever taught us anything, it is that evil

>>>>must be confronted, not appeased.
>>>
>>> It taught YOU to suck jew rectums, gook.
>>
>>Quite the retard with the limited vocabulary you are, eh, The Retard?
>>
>>And yeah: you suck and you are an asshole! <BG>
>
> Quite the illiterate Grik asshole, aren't you, eh Pantahose?
> You suck jew rectums and you are a Grik piece of skata!
> <Buggered Grik>

<BG> Of course this hilarious idiot HAD to run along and prove, ON THE SPOT,
the very point I just made about him! It's a hoot!

Thanks for the entertainment, poor The Retard! LOL

Your master

The Peeler

Michael Ejercito

unread,

Apr 3, 2011, 7:03:23 PM4/3/11

to

You mean like the commenters in that NY Times article who claimed
Pastor Jones murdered those twelve people.

By this logic, a group of people can effectively overrule Texas v.
Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), simply by declaring that they will
randomly murder people if an American flag is ever desecrated.

Fortunately, this is not the case.

Michael

Michael Ejercito

unread,

Apr 3, 2011, 7:05:26 PM4/3/11

to

On Apr 3, 3:34 pm, "5950 Dead, 1093 since 1/20/09" <d...@gone.com>
wrote:

> On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 14:19:51 -0700, Michael Ejercito wrote:
> > Imagine, for a moment, that there was this nithing who was obsessed with
> > Taylor Swift, a country singer. So obsessed that he jacks a quart of
> > pecker snot every day while looking at her picture. One day, he decides
> > to take the "relationship" to the next level by sending her a letter
> > that demands sex from her or else he will blow up a building full of
> > people. She does not dignify the letter with a response, and the next
> > day a high-rise goes up in a blast fueled by ammonium nitrate and fuel
> > oil, killing hundreds of people. Swift receives a letter from the
> > nithing again, stating that unless she has sex with him, more buildings
> > will be blown up and more and more people will be killed. And sure
> > enough, more and more buildings are blown up, and the death toll from
> > this campaign by a nithing to have sex with Taylor Swift reaches the
> > thousands.
>
> > So who would be guilty of these bombings?
>
> > Unfortunately, there are too many people who would say Taylor Swift
> > would be guilty of such bombings.
>
> Let me get this straight: you're saying that Terry Jones caused the
> attacks because he demanded that Harmid Karzai have sex with him and
> Karzai refused?

Of course not.

Terry Jones did not kill those twelve U.N. workers any more than
those protesters who broke into St. Patrick's Cathedral kill Matthew
Shepard.

You could have addressed the rest of the article.

Michael

Michael Ejercito

unread,

Apr 3, 2011, 7:07:27 PM4/3/11

to

>
> > If Swift refused to have sex with someone who threatened to blow up
> >buildings full of people if she refused, each and every one of those
> >commenters would blame her for such bombings.
>
> > To be sure, Terry Jones's burning of the Quran was offensive and
> >indecent. It defined the enemy too widely. For example, if people
> >protesting American policies burned an American flag (as opposed to
> >effigies of officials who supported the policies), it would incite
> >Americans to oppose their cause, or at least deter them from
> >supporting it.
>
> > There is another example of "defining the enemy too widely" that
> >happened over twenty years ago. There had been a protest about AIDS
> >where some homosexual protesters disrupted a Mass at St. Patrick's
> >Cathedral.
>

> > http://www.nytimes.com/1989/12/11/nyregion/111-held-in-st-patrick-s-a...

>
> > Disrupting the Mass alienated decent Catholics and other decent
> >people who, while not entirely supportive of the gay agenda,
> >sympathized with them on this issue.
>
> > And yet was this act to blame for future incidents of gay bashing?
> >Were the people who disrupted the Mass guilty of the murder of Matthew
> >Shepard?
>
> > There is nothing more effective in encouraging evil than appeasing
> >it. Indeed, gay rights groups in London OPPOSED a gay pride event in
> >the East End because it might offend Muslims, nevermind that the
> >organizers never intended to challenge Islam or Muslims, only to
> >preach a message of peaceful coexistence.
>
> > http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/london-pride-not/
>
> > And these sand Nazis- for there is no more an accurate description
> >for these nithings than this- always find excuses to wage their jihad.
> >From Israel, to Danish cartoons, to a film, it is always the same end
> >result. Similarly, Hitler claimed that "provocations" by Poland were
> >his reason for the invasion, but many people in their seventies and
> >eighties, with tattoos on their arms, can attest to Hitler's
> >motivations.
>
> > If the Holocaust or 9/11 ever taught us anything, it is that evil
> >must be confronted, not appeased.
>
> It taught YOU to suck jew rectums, gook.

Maybe we should burn some copies of Mein Kampf, to find out how
nithings like you and Topaz react.

You are a Nazi.

As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.

You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know
you can not measure up.

You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.

You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.

You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of
National
Socialism.

Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you... which is why you choose minor
children as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent
adults in a consensually sexual
way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a helpless victim, be
it a prepubescent
boy, or a patient in a mental hospital.

That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or
honest about it.

Michael

Phlip

unread,

Apr 3, 2011, 7:16:16 PM4/3/11

to

On Apr 3, 4:05 pm, Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Terry Jones did not kill those twelve U.N. workers any more than
> those protesters who broke into St. Patrick's Cathedral kill Matthew
> Shepard.

If a mob boss pays a hit man to hit a target - maybe a random target -
the boss is as culpable as the hit man.

Terry Jones knew perfectly well people would die if he burned Korans.
If he didn't think Muslims would have killed, he wouldn't have burned.
It's that simple.

Michael Ejercito

unread,

Apr 3, 2011, 7:35:34 PM4/3/11

to

What reason was there to expect such behavior?

Gregory Lee Johnson, a member of the Revolutionary Communist Youth
Brigade, offended many Americans when he burned an American flag in
front of the Dallas City Hall in Dallas, Texas. And yet, this did not
result in a massive riot killing anyone- either in Dallas or anywhere
else. Johnson was arrested and convicted.

But the Supreme Court overturned the conviction in Texas v.

Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989)

If Americans did not break into government buildings and kill
people because of Johnson's burning of an American flag, why would
Afghans do that in response to Jones's burning of a Quran? Burning a
book or a flag does not automatically and reflexively incite people to
murder.

And is this interpretation of murder statutes what we really want?
Do we really want people to have the power to effectively criminalize
speech simply by threatening to murder people if certain opinions
deemed offensive were ever spoken or published?

Michael

Michael Ejercito

unread,

Apr 3, 2011, 7:36:10 PM4/3/11

to

On Apr 3, 2:56 pm, Phlip <phlip2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Blah blah blah, whatever. We can think of many moral situations
> slightly different from the actual one, and play with them here.
>
> For example, imagine if Michelle Obama had shaken hands with a
> misogynistic Muslim, and riots resulted. Who has the far-right ALREADY
> declared would be at fault?

The rioters.

Michael

Dug

unread,

Apr 3, 2011, 7:48:47 PM4/3/11

to

"Michael Ejercito" <meje...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7aee88ed-25f5-45a8...@d26g2000prn.googlegroups.com...

You are a Nazi.

Michael

****************************
The Revd Retard could just as easily be an islamonazi -- because he
denies the Turkish genocide/enslavement of 2.5 million Armenian and
Assyrian Christians (something nazis never deny/denied) AND the Istanbul
pogrom of the 1950's.

P-Dub

unread,

Apr 3, 2011, 8:08:48 PM4/3/11

to

The retard is a ugly old coot with no friends, and his family is
embarrassed to be associated with him. His only life is to post
antisemitism 20 hours a day. It's what he does for kicks. He has no
other life, and he depends on the Jews to continually show him how much
of a loser he really is.

The retard hasn't had sex in this century. No woman would ever be
interested in such an antisocial, classless, clueless, smelly, ugly
cripple. The retard is a waste of space, and dying would be the best
thing for him, and all those unfortunate to be anywhere near his
stinking loser ass.

In fact, the retard is incontinent, and has to be diapered several times
daily. And he keeps soiling himself here.

The retard should be laughed at constantly, ridiculed, and abused. And
his opinions should be considered as important as any from someone with
an IQ of about 25 or less - as his is. My f'n dog makes more sense than
the retard. And my dog doesn't soil himself like the retard.

P-Dub: Glad I could clear that up for you.

The Revd

unread,

Apr 3, 2011, 10:17:21 PM4/3/11

to

Maybe we should wipe our asses with the torah roll to find out how
jews and those like you who suck their rectums react.

> You are a Nazi.

You are a gook.

> As a Nazi, you are, above all else

As a craven gook who sucks jew rectums, you are, below all else.

The Revd

unread,

Apr 3, 2011, 10:18:37 PM4/3/11

to

On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 16:48:47 -0700, "Dug" <andx...@gggmail.com>
wrote:

There was no Armenian genocide, Duhg. Only the jews whose rectums you
suck are entitled to be genocided.

The Revd

unread,

Apr 3, 2011, 10:19:50 PM4/3/11

to

On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 20:08:48 -0400, P-Dumb <pwol...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

Please join your fellow shabbos goys, Miguel Ejerkito and Duhg, in
lining up to suck jew rectums, you fucking prosemitic asshole.

5950 Dead, 1093 since 1/20/09

unread,

Apr 3, 2011, 8:24:31 PM4/3/11

to

What would your feelings be if some bozo in Afghanistan deliberately
burned a US flag, knowing it would incite the home-grown bozos to
violence, just so he could claim that all Americans were murderous pigs?

Michael Ejercito

unread,

Apr 3, 2011, 8:30:12 PM4/3/11

to

Jews would be horrified.

>
> > You are a Nazi.
>
> You are a gook.

That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.

>
> > As a Nazi, you are, above all else
>
> As a craven gook who sucks jew rectums, you are, below all else.

You are a nithinh- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE.

Bill explains what nithings are.

http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446

Define and Dehumanize the Enemy: Jihadists as Nithings or Nidings

by Bill Levinson
It is an ancient principle of magic (which modern people recognize as
stories that reflect a society’s culture and psychology) that
knowledge of a person’s real or True Name delivers power over that
person. What it really means is that, if you know the person’s
psychology, you can gain an advantage over him. It is also well known
that the side that controls the language of an argument controls the
argument. As an example, Hamas terrorists and their enablers refer to
Israel’s military as an “occupation force” and terrorisitic violence
against civilians as “resistance.”

We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or
refuse) comes close. “Homo sapiens by BIRTH, subhuman by CHOICE”
describes Islamic supremacists perfectly, but it is a phrase and not a
word. We now propose to refer to Islamic supremacists as nithings or
nidings: a Scandinavian word that strips its object of all humanity.
Webster’s dictionary (1913) defines it as “A coward; a dastard; — a
term of utmost opprobrium.”

We remind readers who object to the dehumanization of Islamic
supremacists that those enemies are already attempting to dehumanize
Jews, and to a lesser degree Christians, with images that could have
come directly from Adolf Hitler. As they have chosen to sow the
dragon’s teeth, our position is that they must now reap their rightful
harvest: the complete hatred and loathing of all civilized human
beings.
nithings

Nithing or niding was more than a common insult, because Scandinavian
culture required its subject to fight a duel with the accuser or
become an outlaw: totally devoid of rights, honor, and even
recognition as a human being. Per the Wikipedia entry,

The actual meaning of the adjective argr or ragr [= Anglo-Saxon
earg] was the nature or appearance of effeminacy, especially by
obscene acts. Argr was the worst, most derogatory swearword of all
known to the Norse language. According to Icelandic law, the accused
was expected to kill the accuser at once. …If the accused did not
retort by violent attack yielding either the accuser to take his words
back or the accuser’s death, he was hence proven to be a weak and
cowardly nithing by not retorting accordingly.

A nithing was devoid of all human rights, and he was considered the
enemy of civilized humanity: a perfect depiction of Islamic
supremacists. The word therefore strips the enemy of all humanity, and
degrades him to the status of a wolf or strangler (per Scandinavian
tradition) or a virulent disease like the Black Plague. Black Plague
is a deadly and contagious disease whose vector consists of plague-
carrying rats, while the Green Plague of militant “Islam” is a deadly
and contagious ideology that is spread by bipedal rats: nidings or
nithings, non-humans that raise violent hands to all of civilized
Humanity.

The immediate consequence of being proven a nithing was
outlawing. The outlawed did not have any rights, he was exlex (Latin
for “outside of the legal system”), in Anglo-Saxon utlah, Middle Low
German uutlagh, Old Norse utlagr. Just as feud yielded enmity among
kinships, outlawry yielded enmity of all humanity.[63] …”Yet that is
but one aspect of outlawry. The outlaw is not only expelled from the
kinship, he is also regarded henceforth as an enemy to mankind.”

The actual definition of a nithing is somewhat more involved and
complex, and it gets into sexual perversions and zoomorphical
transformations (Loki’s transformation of himself into a mare to have
sexual intercourse with a stallion, and thus beget Odin’s horse
Sleipner is probably an example), but the following line is pertinent:
“The nithing used its malicious seid magic to destroy anything owned
and made by man, ultimately the human race and Midgard itself[6], due
to its basically unlimited envy, hate, and malice that were nith.”

“Destruction of everything owned and made by Man” (the Palestinians’
destruction of the greenhouses in Gaza comes to mind immediately) and
“unlimited envy, hate, and malice” describe militant “Islam”
perfectly, and further underscore the application of nithing or niding
to describe it. The propensity for mindless destruction also appears
in Orson Scott Card’s Alvin Maker series, in which a supernatural
enemy is known as the Unmaker: a personification of evil that is the
total antithesis of God the Creator.

The Unmaker is the main antagonist in Orson Scott Card’s
alternate history/fantasy series The Tales of Alvin Maker. Never
directly confronted, it is a supernatural force that breaks apart
matter and aims to destroy and consume everything and everyone. …To
make something is to oppose the Unmaker, but a point often made is
that this is futile. By natural law the Unmaker can tear down faster
than any man can build.

This also is an outstanding definition of militant “Islam” or Islamic
supremacy: an ideology that seeks to destroy everything into which it
comes in contact, and with which no reason, negotiation, or compromise
is possible.

In summary, a nithing or niding is the enemy of Civilization, a
subhuman (through its behavioral choices, and emphatically NOT due to
its racial or ethnic origin) monster with total hatred and malice
toward all human industry and arts, and worthy of nothing but
extermination like any virulent disease. This is the word we will now
apply to Islamic supremacists and their enablers, and we encourage
others to do likewise.

Michael Ejercito

unread,

Apr 3, 2011, 9:18:13 PM4/3/11

to

On Apr 3, 5:24 pm, "5950 Dead, 1093 since 1/20/09" <d...@gone.com>
wrote:

> On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 16:03:23 -0700, Michael Ejercito wrote:
> > On Apr 3, 3:26 pm, Phlip <phlip2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Apr 3, 3:10 pm, "Dug" <andxor...@gggmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > But no one was killed for either of the above actions or inactions,
> >> > unlike in the instant case when muslime fucks slaughter dozens of
> >> > people because someone burned their holey book of hatred.
>
> >> > FOAD.
>
> >> Welcome to America, were "rugged individualism" means some folks are
> >> afraid of their own shadow.
> > You mean like the commenters in that NY Times article who claimed
> > Pastor Jones murdered those twelve people.
>
> > By this logic, a group of people can effectively overrule Texas v.
> > Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), simply by declaring that they will
> > randomly murder people if an American flag is ever desecrated.
>
> > Fortunately, this is not the case.
>
> > Michael
>
> What would your feelings be if some bozo in Afghanistan deliberately
> burned a US flag, knowing it would incite the home-grown bozos to
> violence, just so he could claim that all Americans were murderous pigs?
>
> --

Some bozo named Gregory Lee Johnson did just that while protesting
the 1884 Republican convention in Dallas.

And yet I find it remarkable about the lack of home grown bozos
being incited to violence of Johnson's act.

Michael

Phlip

unread,

Apr 3, 2011, 10:12:53 PM4/3/11

to

On Apr 3, 4:36 pm, Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> > For example, imagine if Michelle Obama had shaken hands with a
> > misogynistic Muslim, and riots resulted. Who has the far-right ALREADY
> > declared would be at fault?
>
> The rioters.
>
> Michael

Would you like me to look up verbiage by right-wing politicians saying
Michelle would have been at fault?

Phlip

unread,

Apr 3, 2011, 10:12:59 PM4/3/11

to

On Apr 3, 4:35 pm, Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> > Terry Jones knew perfectly well people would die if he burned Korans.
> > If he didn't think Muslims would have killed, he wouldn't have burned.
> > It's that simple.
>
> What reason was there to expect such behavior?

Pretzel logic achieved.

Everyone knows that people in war zones tend to become zealots with
inferiority complexes around their religions. We have all seen them
kill over much slighter insults.

Yes, TJ knew they would kill if he burned, and stupidity is no excuse.
TJ's act represented depraved indifference to human life, leading to
death. That's manslaughter, and because he did it to increase profits
to his "church", it's murder.

5950 Dead, 1093 since 1/20/09

unread,

Apr 3, 2011, 10:41:44 PM4/3/11

to

Johnson was an Afghani trying to incite Americans? I had no idea!

Now, you can dance all you want, but the plain fact is the American right
is only a few steps removed from being just like the religious freaks in
Afghanistan. So let me repeat my little thought experiment to you:

What would your feelings be if some bozo in Afghanistan deliberately
burned a US flag, knowing it would incite the home-grown bozos to
violence, just so he could claim that all Americans were murderous
pigs?

>

> And yet I find it remarkable about the lack of home grown bozos
> being incited to violence of Johnson's act.
>
>
> Michael

--

The Revd

unread,

Apr 4, 2011, 12:44:59 AM4/4/11

to

Who gives a shit? They have no respect for other religions. Fuck 'em.

>>
>> > You are a Nazi.
>>
>> You are a gook.
> That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.

Absurd. How can it be, gook?

>>
>> > As a Nazi, you are, above all else
>>
>> As a craven gook who sucks jew rectums, you are, below all else.
> You are a nithinh- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE.
>
> Bill explains what nithings are.
>
> http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446

I explain what Bill is.

http://bill_levinstein_is_a_jew_asshole

And you suck his fat jew rectum 24/7.

Michael Ejercito

unread,

Apr 4, 2011, 12:51:45 AM4/4/11

to

On Apr 3, 7:41 pm, "5950 Dead, 1093 since 1/20/09" <d...@gone.com>

He was an American who was a member of the Revolutionary Youth
Communist Brigade.

>
> Now, you can dance all you want, but the plain fact is the American right
> is only a few steps removed from being just like the religious freaks in
> Afghanistan. So let me repeat my little thought experiment to you:
>
> What would your feelings be if some bozo in Afghanistan deliberately
> burned a US flag, knowing it would incite the home-grown bozos to
> violence, just so he could claim that all Americans were murderous
> pigs?

They have been burning American flags.

Yet there was no violence.

Michael

Michael Ejercito

unread,

Apr 4, 2011, 12:53:55 AM4/4/11

to

On Apr 3, 7:12 pm, Phlip <phlip2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 3, 4:35 pm, Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Terry Jones knew perfectly well people would die if he burned Korans.
> > > If he didn't think Muslims would have killed, he wouldn't have burned.
> > > It's that simple.
>
> > What reason was there to expect such behavior?
>
> Pretzel logic achieved.
>
> Everyone knows that people in war zones tend to become zealots with
> inferiority complexes around their religions. We have all seen them
> kill over much slighter insults.

Even though those insults were across the ocean?

It is not like anyone waved a burning Quran in front of their
face.

>
> Yes, TJ knew they would kill if he burned, and stupidity is no excuse.
> TJ's act represented depraved indifference to human life, leading to
> death. That's manslaughter, and because he did it to increase profits
> to his "church", it's murder.

And yet I can not recall Gregory Lee Johnson being convicted of
manslaughter for burning an American flag in front of the Dallas City
Hall in 1984. In fact, I can not recall a murderous reaction to that
event.

I wonder why.

Michael

Michael Ejercito

unread,

Apr 4, 2011, 12:59:25 AM4/4/11

to

On Apr 3, 9:44 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Griks> wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 17:30:12 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
>
>

> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Apr 3, 7:17 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Griks> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 16:07:27 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Maybe we should burn some copies of Mein Kampf, to find out how
> >> >nithings like you and Topaz react.
>
> >> Maybe we should wipe our asses with the torah roll to find out how
> >> jews and those like you who suck their rectums react.
> > Jews would be horrified.
>
> Who gives a shit? They have no respect for other religions. Fuck 'em.

Life fucks you up, boy.

>
>
>
> >> > You are a Nazi.
>
> >> You are a gook.
> > That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>
> Absurd. How can it be, gook?

You prove it with your posts.

>
>
>
> >> > As a Nazi, you are, above all else
>
> >> As a craven gook who sucks jew rectums, you are, below all else.
> > You are a nithinh- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE.
>
> > Bill explains what nithings are.
>
> > http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446
>
> I explain what Bill is.
>
> http://bill_levinstein_is_a_jew_asshole

That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.

>

> And you suck his fat jew rectum 24/7.

This link explains you.

http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/what-is-a-nazi

Michael

Dug

unread,

Apr 4, 2011, 1:38:07 AM4/4/11

to

"Phlip" <phli...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:efb00319-a5a8-4b3c...@q12g2000prb.googlegroups.com...

**********************
More than 3000 Americans have been slaughtered in the USA by muslime fucks
since the first World Trade Center bombing in the early 1990's.

ESADP Ahmed.

The Peeler

unread,

Apr 4, 2011, 7:01:37 AM4/4/11

to

On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 20:19:50 -0600, The Retard, the resident psychopath of

sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
wrote:

>>The retard is a ugly old coot with no friends, and his family is

>>embarrassed to be associated with him. His only life is to post
>>antisemitism 20 hours a day. It's what he does for kicks. He has no
>>other life, and he depends on the Jews to continually show him how much
>>of a loser he really is.
>>
>>The retard hasn't had sex in this century. No woman would ever be
>>interested in such an antisocial, classless, clueless, smelly, ugly
>>cripple. The retard is a waste of space, and dying would be the best
>>thing for him, and all those unfortunate to be anywhere near his
>>stinking loser ass.
>>
>>In fact, the retard is incontinent, and has to be diapered several times
>>daily. And he keeps soiling himself here.
>>
>>The retard should be laughed at constantly, ridiculed, and abused. And
>>his opinions should be considered as important as any from someone with
>>an IQ of about 25 or less - as his is. My f'n dog makes more sense than
>>the retard. And my dog doesn't soil himself like the retard.
>>
>>P-Dub: Glad I could clear that up for you.
>
> Please join your fellow shabbos goys, Miguel Ejerkito and Duhg, in
> lining up to suck jew rectums, you fucking prosemitic asshole.

<BG> Does that mean you do NOT agree with this fine description of you, our
battered punching bag? I find it describes you to a "t", you ridiculous
abnormal psycho! LOL

--
The top 5 truths about our resident psychopath, The Retard:

the desperate psycho can't SLEEP anymore,
he can't get out of the house anymore,
he got NOBODY to talk to anymore,
he can't FUCK anymore,
he got no life outside Usenet AT ALL!

The Peeler

unread,

Apr 4, 2011, 7:02:06 AM4/4/11

to

On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 20:18:37 -0600, The Retard, the resident psychopath of

sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
wrote:

>>honest about it.

>>
>> Michael
>>
>>****************************
>>The Revd Retard could just as easily be an islamonazi -- because he
>>denies the Turkish genocide/enslavement of 2.5 million Armenian and
>>Assyrian Christians (something nazis never deny/denied) AND the Istanbul
>>pogrom of the 1950's.
>
> There was no Armenian genocide, Duhg. Only the jews whose rectums you
> suck are entitled to be genocided.

LOL! As always, the entire decent and educated part of humanity disagrees
with you, poor The Retard! And yeah: you suck and you are a rectum! And you
know it!

The Peeler

unread,

Apr 4, 2011, 7:02:58 AM4/4/11

to

On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 20:17:21 -0600, The Retard, the resident psychopath of

sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
wrote:

>>>

>>> It taught YOU to suck jew rectums, gook.
>> Maybe we should burn some copies of Mein Kampf, to find out how
>>nithings like you and Topaz react.
>
> Maybe we should wipe our asses with the torah roll to find out how
> jews and those like you who suck their rectums react.

We prefer to wipe our asses with you, every day, poor The Retard!

>> You are a Nazi.
>
> You are a gook.

He isn't. But you are indeed a sick subnormal degenerate and perverted
psychpathic swine! And you KNOW it! LOL

>> As a Nazi, you are, above all else
>
> As a craven gook who sucks jew rectums, you are, below all else.

As the sick subnormal degenerate and perverted psychopathic swine that you
are, NOBODY and NOTHING is ever below you, poor The Retard! And you know
THAT too!

The Revd

unread,

Apr 4, 2011, 9:01:44 AM4/4/11

to

On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 21:59:25 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Apr 3, 9:44 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Griks> wrote:
>> On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 17:30:12 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Apr 3, 7:17 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Griks> wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 16:07:27 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Maybe we should burn some copies of Mein Kampf, to find out how
>> >> >nithings like you and Topaz react.
>>
>> >> Maybe we should wipe our asses with the torah roll to find out how
>> >> jews and those like you who suck their rectums react.
>> > Jews would be horrified.
>>
>> Who gives a shit? They have no respect for other religions. Fuck 'em.
> Life fucks you up, boy.

You fuck your sister up, gook.

>>
>>
>>
>> >> > You are a Nazi.
>>
>> >> You are a gook.
>> > That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>>
>> Absurd. How can it be, gook?
> You prove it with your posts.

You prove the exact opposite with yours.

>>
>>
>>
>> >> > As a Nazi, you are, above all else
>>
>> >> As a craven gook who sucks jew rectums, you are, below all else.
>> > You are a nithinh- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE.
>>
>> > Bill explains what nithings are.
>>
>> > http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446
>>
>> I explain what Bill is.
>>
>> http://bill_levinstein_is_a_jew_asshole
> That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.

Absurd. How can it be, gook?

>>

>> And you suck his fat jew rectum 24/7.
> This link explains you.
>
> http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/what-is-a-nazi

This link explains YOU.

http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/what-is-a-gook

The Peeler

unread,

Apr 4, 2011, 7:04:06 AM4/4/11

to

On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 22:44:59 -0600, The Retard, the resident psychopath of

sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
wrote:

>> Jews would be horrified.

>
> Who gives a shit? They have no respect for other religions. Fuck 'em.

What would a degenerate piece of shit like you know about "respect"? <BG>

>>> > You are a Nazi.
>>>
>>> You are a gook.
>> That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>
> Absurd. How can it be, gook?

You wouldn't understand! You are too retarded, The Retard!

>> Bill explains what nithings are.
>>
>> http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446
>
> I explain what Bill is.
>
> http://bill_levinstein_is_a_jew_asshole

Your "link" is EXACTLY like you and your "life": dead, defunct,
malfunctioning ...and a laugh! LOL

> And you suck his fat jew rectum 24/7.

In fact, you and your "life" suck, and you ARE a rectum!

The Revd

unread,

Apr 4, 2011, 9:07:23 AM4/4/11

to

On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 22:38:07 -0700, "Dug" <andx...@gggmail.com>
wrote:

So what? The World Trade Plaza incident is what happens when your
country sucks jew rectums.

>ESADP Ahmed.

Go fuck yourself, Yitzhak.

The Peeler

unread,

Apr 4, 2011, 7:24:09 AM4/4/11

to

On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 07:07:23 -0600, The Retard, the resident psychopath of

sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
wrote:

>>afraid of their own shadow.

>>
>>**********************
>>More than 3000 Americans have been slaughtered in the USA by muslime fucks
>>since the first World Trade Center bombing in the early 1990's.
>
> So what? The World Trade Plaza incident is what happens when your
> country sucks jew rectums.

Fact is that YOU and your "life" suck, and you ARE a rectum, asshole!

>>ESADP Ahmed.
>
> Go fuck yourself, Yitzhak.

You couldn't even do that, you hilarious housebound impotent frustrated
sexual cripple from London! LOL

The Peeler

unread,

Apr 4, 2011, 7:26:26 AM4/4/11

to

On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 07:01:44 -0600, The Retard, the resident psychopath of

sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
wrote:

So, how's your psychosis in the "US" (LOL) at SIX o'clock in the morning
(according to your latest hhilarious fake time zone), you hilarious
housebound impotent sexual cripple from London? BLOOMING as EVER? LOL

The Revd

unread,

Apr 4, 2011, 9:58:56 AM4/4/11

to

On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 13:26:26 +0200, Roman The Illiterate Grik Foreskin
Peeler <slapping@themoronicGrikinvalid> wrote:

So, how's your pidgin English at 1:26 pm in Grease, Pantahose?
As bad as always? LOL

BTW if you suck any more jew rectum, you'll start to look like one!
Wait! You *already* look like one! LOL!!!!

The Peeler

unread,

Apr 4, 2011, 8:22:20 AM4/4/11

to

On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 07:58:56 -0600, The Retard, the resident psychopath of

sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
wrote:

> On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 13:26:26 +0200, Roman The Illiterate Grik Foreskin

I guess that answered my question above with a resounding "YES"!!!!

LOL!!!

Thanks for all the entertainment you keep providing for free (or rather at
your expense), poor The Retard!

Your master

The Peeler

Michael Ejercito

unread,

Apr 4, 2011, 12:15:00 PM4/4/11

to

On Apr 4, 6:01 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Griks> wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 21:59:25 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
>
>

> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Apr 3, 9:44 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Griks> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 17:30:12 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> >> > You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE.

>
> >> > Bill explains what nithings are.
>
> >> > http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446
>
> >> I explain what Bill is.
>
> >>http://bill_levinstein_is_a_jew_asshole
> > That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>
> Absurd. How can it be, gook?

You prove it with your posts.

You are not getting respect on this newsgroup.

>
>
>
> >> And you suck his fat jew rectum 24/7.
> > This link explains you.
>

> > http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/wh...
>
> This link explains YOU.
>
> http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/wh...

That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.

The following article explains your pathology and the pathology of
those nithings who broke into that U.N. compound and murdered twelve
people.

History's oldest hatred

by Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Globe
March 11, 2009

http://www.jeffjacoby.com/4743/historys-oldest-hatred

ANTI-SEMITISM is an ancient derangement, the oldest of hatreds, so it
is strange that it lacks a more meaningful name. The misnomer "anti-
Semitism" -- a term coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm
Marr, who wanted a scientific-sounding euphemism for Judenhass, or Jew-
hatred -- is particularly inane, since hostility to Jews has never had
anything to do with Semites or being Semitic. (That is why those who
protest that Arabs cannot be anti-Semitic since "Arabs are Semites
too" speak either from ignorance or disingenuousness.)

Perhaps there is no good name for a virus as mutable and unyielding as
anti-Semitism. "The Jews have been objects of hatred in pagan,
religious, and secular societies," write Joseph Telushkin and Dennis
Prager in Why the Jews?, their classic study of anti-Semitism.
"Fascists have accused them of being Communists, and Communists have
branded them capitalists. Jews who live in non-Jewish societies have
been accused of having dual loyalties, while Jews who live in the
Jewish state have been condemned as 'racists.' Poor Jews are bullied,
and rich Jews are resented. Jews have been branded as both rootless
cosmopolitans and ethnic chauvinists. Jews who assimilate have been
called a 'fifth column,' while those who stay together spark hatred
for remaining separate."

So hardy is anti-Semitism, it can flourish without Jews. Shakespeare's
poisonous depiction of the Jewish moneylender Shylock was written for
audiences that had never seen a Jew, all Jews having been expelled
from England more than 300 years earlier. Anti-Semitic bigotry infests
Saudi Arabia, where Jews have not dwelt in at least five centuries;
its malignance is suggested by the government daily Al-Riyadh, which
published an essay claiming that Jews have a taste for "pastries mixed
with human blood."

Esther Confounding Haman (Engraving by Gustave Doré, 1875)
There was Jew-hatred before there was Christianity or Islam, before
Nazism or Communism, before Zionism or the Middle East conflict. This
week Jews celebrate the festival of Purim, gathering in synagogues to
read the biblical book of Esther. Set in ancient Persia, it tells of
Haman, a powerful royal adviser who is insulted when the Jewish sage
Mordechai refuses to bow down to him. Haman resolves to wipe out the
empire's Jews and makes the case for genocide in an appeal to the
king:

"There is a certain people scattered and dispersed among ... all the
provinces of your kingdom, and their laws are different from those of
other peoples, and the king's laws they do not keep, so it is of no
benefit for the king to tolerate them. If it please the king, let it
be written that they be destroyed." After winning royal assent, Haman
makes plans "to annihilate, to kill and destroy all the Jews, the
young and the elderly, children and women, in one day . . . and to
take their property for plunder."

What drives such bloodlust? Haman's indictment accuses the Jews of
lacking national loyalty, of insinuating themselves throughout the
empire, of flouting the king's law. But the Jews of Persia had done
nothing to justify Haman's murderous anti-Semitism -- just as Jews in
later ages did nothing that justified their persecution under the
Church or Islam, or their expulsion from so many lands in Europe and
the Middle East, or their repression at the hands of Russian czars and
Soviet commissars, or their slaughter by Nazi Germany. When the
president of Iran today calls for the extirpation of the Jewish state,
when a leader of Hamas vows to kill Jewish children around the world,
when firebombs are hurled at synagogues in London and Paris and
Chicago, it is not because Jews deserve to be victimized.

Some Jews are no saints, but the paranoid frenzy that is anti-Semitism
is not explained by what Jews do, but by what they are. The Jewish
people are the object of anti-Semitism, not its cause. That is why the
haters' rationales can be so wildly inconsistent and their agendas so
contradictory. What, after all, do those who vilify Jews as greedy
bankers have in common with those who revile them as seditious
Bolsheviks? Nothing, save an irrational obsession with Jews.

At one point in the book of Esther, Haman lets the mask slip. He
boasts to his friends and family of "the glory of his riches, and the
great number of his sons, and everything in which the king had
promoted him and elevated him." Still, he seethes with rage and
frustration: "Yet all this is worthless to me so long as I see
Mordechai the Jew sitting at the king's gate." That is the
unforgivable offense: "Mordechai the Jew" refuses to blend in, to
abandon his values, to be just like everyone else. He goes on sitting
there -- undigested, unassimilated, and for that reason unbearable.

Of course Haman had his ostensible reasons for targeting Jews. So did
Hitler and Arafat; so does Ahmadinejad. Sometimes the anti-Semite
focuses on the Jew's religion, sometimes on his laws and lifestyle,
sometimes on his national identity or his professional achievements.
Ultimately, however, it is the Jew's Jewishness, and the call to
higher standards that it represents, that the anti-Semite cannot
abide.

With all their flaws and failings, the Jewish people endure, their
role in history not yet finished. So the world's oldest hatred endures
too, as obsessive and indestructible -- and deadly -- as ever.

(Jeff Jacoby is a columnist for The Boston Globe.)

The Revd

unread,

Apr 4, 2011, 2:31:54 PM4/4/11

to

On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 09:15:00 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Apr 4, 6:01 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Griks> wrote:
>> On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 21:59:25 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Apr 3, 9:44 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Griks> wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 17:30:12 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE.
>>
>> >> > Bill explains what nithings are.
>>
>> >> > http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446
>>
>> >> I explain what Bill is.
>>
>> >>http://bill_levinstein_is_a_jew_asshole
>> > That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>>
>> Absurd. How can it be, gook?
> You prove it with your posts.

You prove the exact opposite with yours.

> You are not getting respect on this newsgroup.

You are getting jew rectum to suck on this group.

>> >> And you suck his fat jew rectum 24/7.
>> > This link explains you.
>>
>> > http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/wh...
>>
>> This link explains YOU.
>>
>> http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/wh...
> That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.

No, it would't, gook.

> The following article explains your pathology and the pathology of
>those nithings who broke into that U.N. compound and murdered twelve
>people.

Sucking jew rectums explains *your* pathology.

>History's oldest hatred
>
>by Jeff Jacoby
>The Boston Globe
>March 11, 2009
>
>http://www.jeffjacoby.com/4743/historys-oldest-hatred

Jeff Jakobstein knows as well as anyone what the cause of this hatred
is: jew behaviour.

Michael Ejercito

unread,

Apr 4, 2011, 1:43:30 PM4/4/11

to

On Apr 4, 11:31 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Griks> wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 09:15:00 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
>
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Apr 4, 6:01 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Griks> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 21:59:25 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > This link explains you.
>
> >> > http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/wh...
>
> >> This link explains YOU.
>
> >>http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/wh...
> > That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>
> No, it would't, gook.

Yes, it would, and you prove it with your posts.

>
> > The following article explains your pathology and the pathology of
> >those nithings who broke into that U.N. compound and murdered twelve
> >people.
>
> Sucking jew rectums explains *your* pathology.

You equate defending the truth with sucking a rectum.

>
> >History's oldest hatred
>
> >by Jeff Jacoby
> >The Boston Globe
> >March 11, 2009
>
> >http://www.jeffjacoby.com/4743/historys-oldest-hatred
>
> Jeff Jakobstein knows as well as anyone what the cause of this hatred
> is: jew behaviour.

And that Jew behavior is standing for God-based morals and ethics.

This link explains what is wrong with you.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.activism/msg/744028e4fe196d22

"Why do you think it constitutes animal abuse? If you or I tried to
fuck a cow, do you think the cow would even notice? It should not
only be legal but acceptable as a legitimate alternative lifestyle.

The fact is that animals are incapable of giving or refusing consent.
To imagine otherwise is a ridiculous anthropomorphism (look it up,
Levinstein). Do we ask animals for their consent before we kill them
and eat them? By comparison, getting fucked is a minor
inconvenience" - The Revd

The Revd

unread,

Apr 4, 2011, 3:57:09 PM4/4/11

to

On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 10:43:30 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Apr 4, 11:31 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Griks> wrote:
>> On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 09:15:00 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Apr 4, 6:01 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Griks> wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 21:59:25 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > This link explains you.
>>
>> >> > http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/wh...
>>
>> >> This link explains YOU.
>>
>> >>http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/wh...
>> > That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>>
>> No, it would't, gook.
> Yes, it would, and you prove it with your posts.

You prove otherwise with *your* posts, gook.

>> The following article explains your pathology and the pathology of
>> >those nithings who broke into that U.N. compound and murdered twelve
>> >people.
>>
>> Sucking jew rectums explains *your* pathology.
> You equate defending the truth with sucking a rectum.

You equate jew lies, promotion and manipulation with the truth because
you are a gullible shabbos goy who sucks jew rectums.

>>
>> >History's oldest hatred
>>
>> >by Jeff Jacoby
>> >The Boston Globe
>> >March 11, 2009
>>
>> >http://www.jeffjacoby.com/4743/historys-oldest-hatred
>>
>> Jeff Jakobstein knows as well as anyone what the cause of this hatred
>> is: jew behaviour.
> And that Jew behavior is standing for God-based morals and ethics.

LOL!!! Those fucking people don't even know what morals/ethics are,
gook!

The Peeler

unread,

Apr 4, 2011, 3:39:57 PM4/4/11

to

On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 12:31:54 -0600, The Retard, the resident psychopath of

sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
wrote:

>>> > That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.

>>>
>>> Absurd. How can it be, gook?
>> You prove it with your posts.
>
> You prove the exact opposite with yours.

Not at all. But you indeed keep proving that nothing could possible be worse
than being something like you, you miserable housebound impotent sexual
cripple with no life at all!

>> You are not getting respect on this newsgroup.
>
> You are getting jew rectum to suck on this group.

<BG> In fact you and your "life" suck, and you ARE a rectum! And you know
it!

>>> >> And you suck his fat jew rectum 24/7.

>>> > This link explains you.
>>>
>>> > http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/wh...
>>>
>>> This link explains YOU.
>>>
>>> http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/wh...
>> That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>
> No, it would't, gook.

Of course it would! ANYTHING would be better than being something like you,
you sick subnormal degenerated and perverted psychopathic swine. And you
KNOW it! <BG>

>> The following article explains your pathology and the pathology of
>>those nithings who broke into that U.N. compound and murdered twelve
>>people.
>
> Sucking jew rectums explains *your* pathology.

You just "competently" revealed YOUR pathology, psychopath! <BG>

>>History's oldest hatred
>>
>>by Jeff Jacoby
>>The Boston Globe
>>March 11, 2009
>>
>>http://www.jeffjacoby.com/4743/historys-oldest-hatred
>
> Jeff Jakobstein knows as well as anyone what the cause of this hatred
> is: jew behaviour.

Anti-Semitism ALWAYS, without any exception, was and is the resort of
mentally, emotionally and sexually (and often even physically) handicapped
losers who need to project their personal misery and failures on some
scapegoat so they don't constantly have to face their own shortcomings.
EVERY dumb Nazi, without any exception, always was and is like that!

You are simply a prime example of such a miserable, mentally, emotionally
and sexually crippled loser, poor The Retard! <BG>

And if you managed to be honest about it, you'd know this is the truth!

The Peeler

unread,

Apr 4, 2011, 3:40:49 PM4/4/11

to

On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:57:09 -0600, The Retard, the resident psychopath of

sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
wrote:

.
>>> > That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>>>
>>> No, it would't, gook.
>> Yes, it would, and you prove it with your posts.
>
> You prove otherwise with *your* posts, gook.

Not at all. But you indeed keep proving that nothing could possibly be worse

than being something like you, you miserable housebound impotent sexual
cripple with no life at all!

>>> The following article explains your pathology and the pathology of

>>> >those nithings who broke into that U.N. compound and murdered twelve
>>> >people.
>>>
>>> Sucking jew rectums explains *your* pathology.
>> You equate defending the truth with sucking a rectum.
>
> You equate jew lies, promotion and manipulation with the truth because
> you are a gullible shabbos goy who sucks jew rectums.

You just "competently" revealed your pathology again, poor The Retard! Proud
of it? Of course you are! LOL

>>>
>>> >History's oldest hatred
>>>
>>> >by Jeff Jacoby
>>> >The Boston Globe
>>> >March 11, 2009
>>>
>>> >http://www.jeffjacoby.com/4743/historys-oldest-hatred
>>>
>>> Jeff Jakobstein knows as well as anyone what the cause of this hatred
>>> is: jew behaviour.
>> And that Jew behavior is standing for God-based morals and ethics.
>
> LOL!!! Those fucking people don't even know what morals/ethics are,
> gook!

Of course you are projecting again, as ALWAYS! Typical pathological Nazi
behaviour, btw, little idiot! <BG>

Ray Fischer

unread,

Apr 4, 2011, 11:03:28 PM4/4/11

to

Dug <andx...@gggmail.com> wrote:
>More than 3000 Americans have been slaughtered in the USA by muslime fucks
>since the first World Trade Center bombing in the early 1990's.

Aboout 5000 Americans have died and have a million Muslims because
of neonazi bigots like you.

--
Ray Fischer | Mendacracy (n.) government by lying
rfis...@sonic.net | The new GOP ideal

Grantland

unread,

Apr 5, 2011, 5:55:29 AM4/5/11

to

On Apr 4, 2:30 am, Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:

"We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or
refuse) comes close. "

Actually we do have such a word. That word is "Jew". Impolite,
certainly, but not taboo. (I would have thought)..

Live and learn .

Grantland

Phlip

unread,

Apr 5, 2011, 9:59:12 AM4/5/11

to

On Apr 4, 9:15 am, Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> The following article explains your pathology and the pathology of
> those nithings who broke into that U.N. compound and murdered twelve
> people.

If Terry Jones was a radical self-proclaimed Muslim, and if he wore
robes and a turban while burning Korans, leading to a massacre, we
would not be having this argument.

TJ did exactly what those Afghan Mullahs wanted him to.

Michael Ejercito

unread,

Apr 5, 2011, 10:48:27 AM4/5/11

to

You are a Nazi.

As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.

You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know
you can not measure up.

You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.

You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.

You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of
National
Socialism.

Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you... which is why you choose minor
children as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent
adults in a consensually sexual
way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a helpless victim, be
it a prepubescent
boy, or a patient in a mental hospital.

That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or
honest about it.

Michael

Phlip

unread,

Apr 5, 2011, 10:56:26 AM4/5/11

to

On Apr 5, 7:48 am, Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> You are a Nazi.

I thought he was a "nithing".

> You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
> tell it.

Sounds like you.

The Revd

unread,

Apr 5, 2011, 6:18:28 PM4/5/11

to

On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 07:48:27 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Apr 5, 2:55 am, Grantland <grantla...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Apr 4, 2:30 am, Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> "We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
>> humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
>> worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
>> English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or
>> refuse) comes close. "
>>
>> Actually we do have such a word. That word is "Jew". Impolite,
>> certainly, but not taboo. (I would have thought)..
>>
>> Live and learn .
>>
>> Grantland
> You are a Nazi.

You are a gook.

The Peeler

unread,

Apr 5, 2011, 5:39:06 PM4/5/11

to

On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:18:28 -0600, The Retard, the resident psychopath of

sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
wrote:

>>> Live and learn .

>>>
>>> Grantland
>> You are a Nazi.
>
> You are a gook.

He isn't. But you are a sick subnormal degenerate and perverted psychopathic

swine. And you KNOW it! <BG>

>> As a Nazi, you are, above all else

>
> As a craven gook who sucks jew rectums, you are, below all else.

As the sick subnormal degenerate and perverted psychopathic swine that you
are, NOBODY and NOTHING is ever below you! And you know THAT too!

--
Recent quotes about The Retard:
Jimbo: "You're an abortion that should have happened."
Attila: "Are you a corpse that has not died yet?"
Virgil: "The world would be a better place if we could go
back in time and abort some idiots like formby before they were hatched."
Ejercito:"If he believed in racial hygiene, he would gas himself."
Ray Fischer: "We're not interested in your sexual fantasies, pervert."
Doug: "Pitiful diarrhea is the Revd's real name."
The Chief Instigator: "You've all the strength of wet toilet paper."
W.T.S.: "You are a liar. You are an obvious liar. You are a liar who has no
talent for making a lie believable."
Doug: "Your posts are nothing but written diarrhea."

Michael Ejercito

unread,

Apr 5, 2011, 9:25:57 PM4/5/11

to

On Apr 5, 3:18 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Griks> wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 07:48:27 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
>
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Apr 5, 2:55 am, Grantland <grantla...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Apr 4, 2:30 am, Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> "We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
> >> humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
> >> worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
> >> English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or
> >> refuse) comes close. "
>
> >> Actually we do have such a word. That word is "Jew". Impolite,
> >> certainly, but not taboo. (I would have thought)..
>
> >> Live and learn .
>
> >> Grantland
> > You are a Nazi.
>
> You are a gook.

That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.

You are a Nazi.

Bill Levinson

unread,

Apr 5, 2011, 9:35:39 PM4/5/11

to

On Apr 3, 8:34 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Griks> wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 00:25:23 +0200, Roman The Illiterate Grik Foreskin
>
>
>
> Peeler <slapping@themoronicGrikinvalid> wrote:
> >On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 18:09:59 -0600, The Retard, the resident psychopath of

> >sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
> >wrote:
>

> >>>for these nithings than this- always find excuses to wage their jihad.
> >>>From Israel, to Danish cartoons, to a film, it is always the same end
> >>>result. Similarly, Hitler claimed that "provocations" by Poland were
> >>>his reason for the invasion, but many people in their seventies and
> >>>eighties, with tattoos on their arms, can attest to Hitler's
> >>>motivations.
>
> >>> If the Holocaust or 9/11 ever taught us anything, it is that evil
> >>>must be confronted, not appeased.
>
> >> It taught YOU to suck jew rectums, gook.
>
> >Quite the retard with the limited vocabulary you are, eh, The Retard?
>
> >And yeah: you suck and you are an asshole! <BG>
>
> Quite the illiterate Grik asshole, aren't you, eh Pantahose?
> You suck jew rectums and you are a Grik piece of skata!
> <Buggered Grik>

This from the Reverend Terence Fformby-Smythe (soc.culture.israel
village idiot and sideshow freak), online for all time: ""If you or I

tried to fuck a cow, do you think the cow would even notice? It
should not only be legal but acceptable as a legitimate alternative
lifestyle."

Mooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

Don't forget to remove the extraneous newsgroups (crossposting) that
the sideshow freak adds to his postings.

The Revd

unread,

Apr 6, 2011, 10:16:12 AM4/6/11

to

On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 18:25:57 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Apr 5, 3:18 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Griks> wrote:
>> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 07:48:27 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Apr 5, 2:55 am, Grantland <grantla...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On Apr 4, 2:30 am, Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> "We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
>> >> humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
>> >> worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
>> >> English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or
>> >> refuse) comes close. "
>>
>> >> Actually we do have such a word. That word is "Jew". Impolite,
>> >> certainly, but not taboo. (I would have thought)..
>>
>> >> Live and learn .
>>
>> >> Grantland
>> > You are a Nazi.
>>
>> You are a gook.
> That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.

Absurd, gook,

> You are a Nazi.

You are a gook.

> As a Nazi, you are, above all else

As a craven gook with his head stuck up the collective jew rectum, you
are, below all else.

The Peeler

unread,

Apr 6, 2011, 8:28:06 AM4/6/11

to

On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 08:16:12 -0600, The Retard, the resident psychopath of

sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
wrote:

>>>

>>> >> Grantland
>>> > You are a Nazi.
>>>
>>> You are a gook.
>> That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>
> Absurd, gook,

That's what you and your "life" certainly are, poor The Retard! <BG>

>> You are a Nazi.
>
> You are a gook.

He isn't. But you are indeed a sick subnormal degenerate and perverted
psychopathic swine. And you even KNOW it! LOL

>> As a Nazi, you are, above all else
>
> As a craven gook with his head stuck up the collective jew rectum, you
> are, below all else.

As the sick subnormal degenerate and perverted psychopathic swine that you
are, NOBODY and NOTHING is EVER below you, poor sod! And you know THAT too!
<BG>

Michael Ejercito

unread,

Apr 6, 2011, 12:18:23 PM4/6/11

to

On Apr 6, 5:28 am, The Peeler <slapp...@themoronicRevd.invalid> wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 08:16:12 -0600, The Retard, the resident psychopath of
> sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >>> >> Grantland
> >>> > You are a Nazi.
>
> >>> You are a gook.
> >> That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>
> > Absurd, gook,
>
> That's what you and your "life" certainly are, poor The Retard! <BG>
>
> >> You are a Nazi.
>
> > You are a gook.
That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.

>
> He isn't. But you are indeed a sick subnormal degenerate and perverted
> psychopathic swine. And you even KNOW it! LOL

He proves it with his posts.

>
> >> As a Nazi, you are, above all else
>
> > As a craven gook with his head stuck up the collective jew rectum, you
> > are, below all else.
>
> As the sick subnormal degenerate and perverted psychopathic swine that you
> are, NOBODY and NOTHING is EVER below you, poor sod! And you know THAT too!
> <BG>
>
> --
> Recent quotes about The Retard:
> Jimbo: "You're an abortion that should have happened."
> Attila: "Are you a corpse that has not died yet?"
> Virgil: "The world would be a better place if we could go
> back in time and abort some idiots like formby before they were hatched."
> Ejercito:"If he believed in racial hygiene, he would gas himself."
> Ray Fischer: "We're not interested in your sexual fantasies, pervert."
> Doug: "Pitiful diarrhea is the Revd's real name."
> The Chief Instigator: "You've all the strength of wet toilet paper."
> W.T.S.: "You are a liar. You are an obvious liar. You are a liar who has no
> talent for making a lie believable."
> Doug: "Your posts are nothing but written diarrhea."

He is a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE.

Bill explains what nithings are.

http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446

Define and Dehumanize the Enemy: Jihadists as Nithings or Nidings

by Bill Levinson
It is an ancient principle of magic (which modern people recognize as
stories that reflect a society’s culture and psychology) that
knowledge of a person’s real or True Name delivers power over that
person. What it really means is that, if you know the person’s
psychology, you can gain an advantage over him. It is also well known
that the side that controls the language of an argument controls the
argument. As an example, Hamas terrorists and their enablers refer to
Israel’s military as an “occupation force” and terrorisitic violence
against civilians as “resistance.”

We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or

refuse) comes close. “Homo sapiens by BIRTH, subhuman by CHOICE”
describes Islamic supremacists perfectly, but it is a phrase and not a
word. We now propose to refer to Islamic supremacists as nithings or
nidings: a Scandinavian word that strips its object of all humanity.
Webster’s dictionary (1913) defines it as “A coward; a dastard; — a
term of utmost opprobrium.”