Obama A Very, Very Effective Leader
Bradley K. Sherman
o Healthcare
o Wall Street Reform
o BP Capitulation
o McChrystal sacking, Petraeus demotion
And a potential for Energy/Climate legislation before
Congress adjourns for the election.
All that despite an intransigent and seditious GOP.
And not a lot of bluster. Speak softly, etc.
--bks
waybackjack
President Obama is an epic failure
Arrogant, Stupid, Seditious & Treasonous
By Bill Turner Saturday, April 10, 2010
Under the rule of B. Hussein Obama, America, Americans, the economy,
our Constitution, our freedom and our liberty are all worse than they
were before. President Obama is an epic failure. The people that
Generalissimo Obama has chosen to surround himself with are failures
of epic proportions. An assault of unprecedented magnitude is taking
place upon America and it is being driven by B. Hussein Obama. Listed
below are just a few of the failures, mistakes, and assaults upon
America committed by Obama and his minions, since January 20th 2009,
when he took office:
Obama & China: Hey, let’s fly the Chinese flag at the White House,
what could be the harm? What message could it send?
Government sanctioned desecration of bodies: Hey, why not take the
organs without asking? Godless.
John Holdren: Forced sterilization, mandatory abortion and so much
more. Nazi Germany brought to America.
Kevin Jennings: Fisting and your children, what could go wrong? How
about allowing the man behind Fistgate to be Safe Schools Czar?
Van Jones: Avowed communist, radical, and racist put in charge of
creating green jobs. He does, overseas. Oh, and he blames America for
9/11, calling it an inside job.
9/11: We will not honor the fallen from the attack upon America. Obama
proclaims it interfaith day and honors Islam, the ones who attacked
America.
Obama: Refuses to provide information about his past, raising major
questions about his birth, his college days and why he surrendered his
law license when charged with crimes. Nice.
Lockerbie: Obama knew of and allowed the release of the Lockerbie
bomber. Who is now a hero, and still alive. Epic failure.
Bill Ayers: Frequent White House visitor, unrepentant terrorist and
friend of Obama’s helping shape the brainwashing of America’s young.
Thug Politics: Muscling in on the banking, finance and auto industry
is not presidential, it is communist, Un-Constitutional and immoral.
Free Speech: Obama declares war on free speech.
Off Drilling: It is good for everyone but America. In fact, Obama
gives Soros two billion dollars to drill off shore, elsewhere.
Turbo Tax Timmy: Wonder boy, tax cheat, liar and fraud. Economy is
still collapsing under the weight of his ignorance.
Scare Force One: Generalissimo Obama & the Air Force One joy ride
around New York. How soon we forget his poor judgment started almost
immediately, upon birth.
Nuclear Weapons: Obama decides Iran can have them and America cannot.
What could go wrong?
Jihad: Obama lies, ignores and allows his Muslim brothers to run amok.
Radical Islam removed from government language in the hopes it will be
removed from America.
Homeland Insecurity: Multiple epic failures on behalf of DHS &
Napolitano, making America un-safe once again.
Cap & Trade: Unemployment is high, the economy is poor, lets kill jobs
& raise taxes. What could go wrong? We aren’t a third world country
yet.
Health Care: Obama lies. Bill passes. We are finding out about the
contents of the bill, including little things like no coverage for
pre-existing conditions for children, and huge taxes on businesses,
causing them to lay more people off.
Killing American Citizens: President Obama has authorized the
intentional killing of Anwar al-Awlaki, of al Qaeda, because he is a
security concern. He is an enemy combatant. He is also an American
citizen. Think about that.
Where in the Constitution does it say that an American President (or
Kenyan born American President) can order the execution of an American
citizen because they are a security threat? Yes, he is a major pain in
the posterior and an embarrassment to America. No, it wouldn’t bother
me in the slightest if he was killed in military action, he is, after
all, fighting against America. But, for the President to direct
American forces and/or intelligence agencies to assassinate an
American citizen without due process is not acceptable.
Once a president crosses the line and orders the execution of a
citizen, without due process, it opens the door to abuse. Who is to
say that Obama will not order the execution of a conservative blogger,
activist, or politician? What would stop a conservative president from
ordering the execution of some liberal? Worse yet, once that wedge is
in place between the citizens of America and the government, what
would prevent a citizen or group of citizens from turning the tables,
since the government decided to start knocking off the opposition?
This move by Obama is part of the unraveling of America.
It should not matter which party you are in or what your political
philosophy is on this one issue. We should all agree, this is a
dangerous path for America to go down, we are not a third world
country yet, despite what our tin pot dictator believes. We are
Americans in America and are still afforded protections under the
Constitution.
__________
On 25 Jun 2010 10:13:22 -0400, b...@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman)
wrote:
ObamaNation=Abomination
Yo, check it out. Even Obama's sycophants at TIME magazine now see
that ObamaCare is a disaster.
Never thought I'd see one of his main cheerleaders go against him.
On 25 Jun 2010 10:13:22 -0400, b...@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman)
wrote:
>Obama is racking up quite a string of victories:
babeejm
>Helluva job you're doing there O..........LOL
Bradley K. Sherman
>On 25 Jun 2010 10:13:22 -0400, b...@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman)
>wrote:
>
Why is it that all the racists in this group insist on top-posting?
Brain damage?
--bks
Ray Fischer
>Obama is racking up quite a string of victories:
> o Healthcare
> o Wall Street Reform
> o BP Capitulation
> o McChrystal sacking, Petraeus demotion
>
>And a potential for Energy/Climate legislation before
>Congress adjourns for the election.
Ending the war in Iraq.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
Bradley K. Sherman
Let's not count our chickens before they're hatched. Bush's
fiasco in Iraq is ongoing.
--bks
Bush's recession
"Bradley K. Sherman" <b...@panix.com> wrote in message
news:i02di2$fqu$1...@panix2.panix.com...
Stopping Bush's recession, from sliding into a depression.
Coffee in Madrid
"Bush's recession" <bo...@none.org> wrote:
> "Bradley K. Sherman" <b...@panix.com> wrote in message
> news:i02di2$fqu$1...@panix2.panix.com...
> > Obama is racking up quite a string of victories:
> > o Healthcare
> > o Wall Street Reform
> > o BP Capitulation
> > o McChrystal sacking, Petraeus demotion
> >
> > And a potential for Energy/Climate legislation before
> > Congress adjourns for the election.
Obama has already done 8 years of work in 1 and 1/2 years.
> Stopping Bush's recession, from sliding into a depression.
While at the same time INHERITING 3 (three) wars, from Global Warming
(GW) Bush.
Coffee in Taverns
waybackjack
<bo...@none.org> wrote:
>Stopping Bush's recession, from sliding into a depression.
>
>
Bush's recession: 6.5% unemployment October 2008.
Odumbo's depression: 10% today.
Duh.
waybackjack
<gde...@eastlink.ca> wrote:
>In article <i039d6$rn0$1...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> "Bush's recession" <bo...@none.org> wrote:
>
>> "Bradley K. Sherman" <b...@panix.com> wrote in message
>> news:i02di2$fqu$1...@panix2.panix.com...
>> > Obama is racking up quite a string of victories:
>> > o Healthcare
>> > o Wall Street Reform
>> > o BP Capitulation
>> > o McChrystal sacking, Petraeus demotion
>> >
>> > And a potential for Energy/Climate legislation before
>> > Congress adjourns for the election.
>
>Obama has already done 8 years of work in 1 and 1/2 years.
Tripling the deficit.
Imagine what it'll be by the end of 4 yrs.
Good work, affirmative action boi.
Deaf Power
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 22:25:22 GMT, DumpObama@ImmediatelyIfNotSooner.
(waybackjack) wrote:
>Bush's recession: 6.5% unemployment October 2008.
>Odumbo's depression: 10% today.
Yup, thanks to Adolf W. Bush for giving Obama the depression.
>Duh.
Duh.
waybackjack
"And wif muh stimulus pakg., unemployment won't rise above 8%." --
Hussein Obama
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
The nigger has wrecked the US economy.
Deaf Power
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 23:15:07 GMT, DumpObama@ImmediatelyIfNotSooner.
(waybackjack) wrote:
>nigger
Spoken like a racist. All neoclowns are racists anyway.
Bush's recession
"waybackjack" <DumpObama@ImmediatelyIfNotSooner.> wrote in message
news:4c252cf7....@news.eternal-september.org...
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 22:20:15 GMT, Coffee in Madrid
> <gde...@eastlink.ca> wrote:
>
>>In article <i039d6$rn0$1...@news.eternal-september.org>,
>> "Bush's recession" <bo...@none.org> wrote:
>>
>>> "Bradley K. Sherman" <b...@panix.com> wrote in message
>>> news:i02di2$fqu$1...@panix2.panix.com...
>>> > Obama is racking up quite a string of victories:
>>> > o Healthcare
>>> > o Wall Street Reform
>>> > o BP Capitulation
>>> > o McChrystal sacking, Petraeus demotion
>>> >
>>> > And a potential for Energy/Climate legislation before
>>> > Congress adjourns for the election.
>>
>>Obama has already done 8 years of work in 1 and 1/2 years.
>
> Tripling the deficit.
>
> Imagine what it'll be by the end of 4 yrs.
>
> Good work, affirmative action boi.
Phhhfftttt!!! LMAO! Good one, but you'll be doing yourself a favor, and
looking up the facts. Bush had a 10 Trillion dollar deficit, which he
handed over to Obama. Now show where the deficit is 30 Trillion dollars.
Time to put up, or SHUT UP.
You scum Bush lover's would have loved for the USA to go into a depression.
Time for you to BOW to Obama, YOU owe him, unless you're trying to destroy
America.
Bush's recession
"waybackjack" <DumpObama@ImmediatelyIfNotSooner.> wrote in message
Wrong again, you lying commie pinko. Bush had a RISING unemployment rate,
which hit over 8%, when Obama took over.
Don't you just hate FACTS? Probably more than you hate America.
http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?series_id=LNS14000000&data_tool=%22EaG%22
Ray Fischer
Ray Fischer
>On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 18:08:36 -0400, "Bush's recession"
><bo...@none.org> wrote:
>
>>Stopping Bush's recession, from sliding into a depression.
>>
>>
>Bush's recession: 6.5% unemployment October 2008.
>
There is no "depression", rightard. There are still the effects of
Bush's recession.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
Major Debacle
You lefturds really live in a fantasy world don't you?
The bill for reality is right around the corner and it's all
Obama.
Incompetent, crooked, dirty as any common street drug dealer.
waybackjack
<bo...@none.org> wrote:
If George W Bush had proposed to DOUBLE the National Debt, which had
taken more than two Centuries to accumulate, in one year, would you
have approved?
If George W. Bush had then proposed to DOUBLE the National Debt AGAIN
within 10 years, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had spent more than All the Presidents combined
since George Washington, would you have approved?
So, tell me again, what is it about Barack Hussein Obama that makes
him so brilliant and impressive? Can't think of anything?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Sleazy Nancy
You apparently went to one of the govt.-run schools that ignore
reading, writing, and arithmetic in favor of indoctrinating the kiddos
in left wing political correctness.
Otherwise, you'd know that 10% unemployment (Obama) is higher than
6.5% unemployment (Bush).
Duh.
Way Back Jack
<bo...@none.org> wrote:
>
>"waybackjack" <DumpObama@ImmediatelyIfNotSooner.> wrote in message
>news:4c252c94....@news.eternal-september.org...
>> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 18:08:36 -0400, "Bush's recession"
>> <bo...@none.org> wrote:
>>
>>>Stopping Bush's recession, from sliding into a depression.
>>>
>>>
>> Bush's recession: 6.5% unemployment October 2008.
>>
>> Odumbo's depression: 10% today.
>>
>> Duh.
>
>Wrong again, you lying commie pinko. Bush had a RISING unemployment rate,
>which hit over 8%, when Obama took over.
>
>Don't you just hate FACTS? Probably more than you hate America.
>http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?series_id=LNS14000000&data_tool=%22EaG%22
November 11, 2008
U.S. Unemployment Rates Under President Bush Continue to Climb
Posted by Kristina Cowan
U.S. unemployment rates under President Bush have reached a 14-year
high. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, unemployment
climbed to 6.5 percent in October, as the country shed 240,000 jobs.
(snip)
http://blogs.payscale.com/salary_report_kris_cowan/2008/11/post.html
________
I accept your apology, white nigger.
Way Back Jack
The lying negro didn't improve anything.
10% is worse than 6.5% .... and after promising us that it would not
top 8%.
And he tripled the debt to boot.
>--
>Ray Fischer
>rfis...@sonic.net
>
Sleazy Nancy
Hey fishguts, is it something in the negro genetics to never take
responsibility and blame others for your failures?
Or is it merely a function of you people being pampered for so long?
Eh?
Bush's recession
"Way Back Jack" <DumpObama@ImmediatelyIfNotSooner.> wrote in message
news:4c261114....@news.eternal-september.org...
You stupid fuck, the shrub wasn't out of office in 2008. He should've been,
he's a worthless piece of shit, just like you. Now bow down to your Master
Obama, after-all, he IS the DECIDER.
Bush's recession
"waybackjack" <DumpObama@ImmediatelyIfNotSooner.> wrote in message
What do you mean "if"? He did! The only ones who approved was his goose
steppers, like you.
Way Back Jack
<bo...@none.org> wrote:
Bush's spending made him look like a piker compared to the
communist-in-chief.
It must be true what they say: you negros really know how to make the
eagle fly.
And when it is other people's eagles, WOW!
Way Back Jack
<bo...@none.org> wrote:
Bush's unemployment rates were faaaarrrrrrrr below the piece of shit
who now occupies the White House.
What happened to that "won't exceed 8% promise"?
Ray Fischer
>On 26 Jun 2010 07:25:32 GMT, rfis...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>
>>waybackjack <chillin'@home.net> wrote:
>>>On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 18:08:36 -0400, "Bush's recession"
>>><bo...@none.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Stopping Bush's recession, from sliding into a depression.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Bush's recession: 6.5% unemployment October 2008.
>>>
>>>depression: 10% today.
>>
>>There is no "depression", rightard. There are still the effects of
>>Bush's recession.
>
>The lying negro didn't improve anything.
It's not _fair_ to call rightards racist.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
Ray Fischer
>On 26 Jun 2010 07:25:32 GMT, rfis...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>
>>waybackjack <chillin'@home.net> wrote:
>>>On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 18:08:36 -0400, "Bush's recession"
>>><bo...@none.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Stopping Bush's recession, from sliding into a depression.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Bush's recession: 6.5% unemployment October 2008.
>>>
>>>depression: 10% today.
>>
>>There is no "depression", rightard. There are still the effects of
>>Bush's recession.
>
>Hey fishguts, is it something in the negro genetics to never take
It's not _fair_ to call rightarts racist.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
Way Back Jack
It's quite accurate to call Eric Holder and Obama racists though.
>--
>Ray Fischer
>rfis...@sonic.net
>
Sleazy Nancy
Equal rights for all? That's not what Eric Holder said in testimony
before the Senate Judiciary Committee in 2009. He asserted that the
hate bill does not protect Christian ministers, whites, heterosexuals,
policemen and members of U.S. military. Only favored groups, he said,
such as homosexuals, blacks, Latinos, Jews, Muslims, and women will
benefit under this new law. (See video "Holder Admits No Equality
Under Hate Bill" at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnziaXfYhc4).
http://www.prisonplanet.com/holder-hate-speech-video-floods-senate.html
On video, Holder admits "No protection for whitey."
__________
In addition, Holder continues to stonewall Congress and the EEOC who
have inquired about his dropping the case against Black Panthers who
terrorized white voters at polling places. His career attys. had
built a case against the Black Panthers over a five-month period but
Holder had it quashed.
There's your racism for ya.
>--
>Ray Fischer
>rfis...@sonic.net
>
D. Stussy
news:87795ef4bb322ca4...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
Common street drug dealers are much more honest than Obama. They don't lie
about price!
Coffee in Madrid
DumpObama@ImmediatelyIfNotSooner. (Way Back Jack) wrote:
> Bush's spending made him look like a piker compared to the
> communist-in-chief.
Bush had a stable-economy to work with.
Bush wrecked that by scuttling-the-old-ship-america.
Handing Obama 3 wars and trillions in deficit for a wrecked and divided
country.
> It must be true what they say: you negros really know how to make the
> eagle fly.
You're obviously no help.
Coffee in S. Africa
Way Back Jack
Obammy took 6.5% unemployment to 10%.
For those of you who went to public schools where they ignore the
basics today and instead indoctrinate you kiddos with leftist
political correctness, 10 is higher than 6.5.
And this occurred after Obama promised that his porkulus packgae would
keep unemployment under 8.
Moreover, he took Bush's debt and triple it.
Coffee in Madrid
AnAbsoluteT...@WhiteHouse.gov (Way Back Jack) wrote:
>
> Moreover, he took Bush's debt and triple it.
Had to.
Either party would HAVE TO do the same.
You should listen to your POTUS Urkel Who-Sane Obombya.
He actually wants to do something about saving America.
Its why he loves her so.
Way Back Jack
Nope.
Remove the regulations and let the economy self-regulate. 6.5% was
highly recoverable if the govt. would keep its nose out.
And the worst thing is that Obama's destruction of the economy is
deliberate.
It seems implausible that a President of the United States could
actually be doing harm to the economy by design, but that appears to
be the case. Despite what the media lapdogs, Obama apologists say, the
economy is “contracting”. It just contracted less than the previous
quarter. If you listen to the media however, things are rosy and we
can see light at the end of the tunnel. WHAT? When Bush was President
the economy was growing every quarter until the Democrats seized
control of Congress. The media was predicting doom every day, the
economy is terrible, it grew at a slower rate than expected, Bush
sucks, the Republicans suck, their policies don’t work,
blah,blah,blah. But now that there is a Democrat in the White House
and a Democratic Congress, all is right with the economy. So what if
people are losing jobs at an alarming rate and they are spending less
money, which will cause more people to lose their jobs. And just what
is a jobless recovery anyway? And while we are at it, what exactly
does adding or “saving” jobs mean? This administration has more
“doublespeak” terms than any I have ever heard.
Here’s the deal. The President does not believe in free market
capitalism. He learned his economics from Maynard Keynes, and Obamas’
own father, who was a Communist Economist in Kenya. He believes in
taxing the rich and spreading the wealth just like Karl Marx. He says
it almost everyday, and he said it to Joe the plumber when he thought
no one could hear.
Let me make economic theory easy for you Obama drones out there.
If a business is taxed more, will the business have more money or less
money? The answer is less money. If this business has less money,are
they going to hire more people or less people? The answer is less
people. Will that mean more people will have jobs or less people will
have jobs. The answer is less people will have jobs. If less people
have jobs, will they have more money to spend at the business you work
at or less money to spend at the business you work for? The answer is
less money to spend at the business you work. Then what happens? YOU
get laid off and so on and so on and so on.
If Taxes are cut, will the business have more money or less money? The
answer is more money. If the business has more money are they going to
hire more people ar less people? The answer is more people. If the
business has more money are they more apt or less apt to give you a
raise. The answer is, if they have more money they might give you a
raise, especially if there are other business out ther hiring more
people and you might go to work for their competitor if you can get
paid more. Competition is good.
Now, if you cut taxes and there are more and more businesses who have
more and more money, hiring people and maybe giving them raises due to
increased competition, are these people who are now working going to
have more money or less money? The answer is more money. If their are
more people who have more money are they more likely to buy your goods
and services or less likely? The answer is more likely. If this
happens are you more likely to have more money or less likely?.The
answer is YOU will have more money!
Where Obamas’ theory of economics fail is he believes that if you tax
people more the government will have more money. I just proved that to
be false. To make a point, would you rather have 20% of 1 million
dollars(200,000) or only 10% of 3 million dollars(300,000)? Of course
the answer is you want the SMALLER portion of the BIGGER pie. If you
cut taxes and expand the economy(the Pie) everyone wins. If you take
larger and larger percentages of the pie it will contract just like
the economy and everyone loses. Just ask the state budget directors
who can’t print money like our esteemed hero, the mighty, the all
powerful, OBAMA!
Speaking of printing money, I hope that all you economic illiterates
out there(Obama supporters) realize that the Government has no money
of its own right? Let me explain that to you also.
The government gets money 3 ways. They can tax you and business, which
is actually another tax on you because a business operates to make
money. If they don’t make enough they close. Now whenever they get
taxed they just pass the costs of the higher taxes to you, and then
YOU pay their tax. So taxing business is crazy. You end up paying
their tax. Now these taxes that are imposed on you by government come
from money that would otherwise be left in the private sector(which
Obama is out to destroy as much as possible i.e. car companies, banks,
insurance companies, doctors, hospitals, etc.). If this money is left
in the private sector then expansion of the pie continues. If it
doesn’t, the pie gets smaller(exactly what Obama is doing, on
purpose).
The second way government can get money is to print it. This is what
Obama is doing also(and is an impeachable offence). He swore to uphold
the Constitution which includes keeping this country sovereign and
keeping the currency strong. If you just print money our currency will
be worth less and less. There will be too many dollars chasing too few
goods which will cause inflation. Prices will rise, you will need more
and more of these dollars to purchase fewer and fewer goods. This is a
bad thing.
The third way the government can get money is by borrowing it at ever
increasing interest rates.(ask China how much of the U.S. debt they
own). Do you Obama morons out there know that in six months Obama has
got us into more debt than all other presidents combined in the
history of the country. HE IS DESTROYING THIS COUNTRY ON PURPOSE! HE
IS EVIL. There, now I feel better. Not as good as I’ll feel in 2010
and 2012, but better. Obama does not love this country. He only sees
its faults(in his eyes). He is out to change it fundamentally. I say
no. The only thing wrong with this country is there are too many
leftist who seek government office. Normal people are going to have
to start running for office or we are in trouble. Of course, I like to
fight. Maybe we need to thin the ranks out a little? We can start with
the anti-capitalist democrats. They can form their own country
somewhere else. It ain’t gonna happen here. I promise you that!!!
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 23:54:10 GMT, Coffee in Madrid
Ray Fischer
>Obammy took 6.5% unemployment to 10%.
Rightard lie. Unemployment was rising when Obama took office due to
Bush's recession.
>Moreover, he took Bush's debt and triple it.
A stupid rightard lie. The national debt is nowhere near $30
trillion. And the deficit is high because of Bush's tax cuts, wars,
and recession.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
Way Back Jack
Hi fishguts.
10/08 = 6.5%
Today = 10%
And after the negro promised 8% tops if the pokk bill passed.
Lying spook.
If George W Bush had proposed to DOUBLE the National Debt, which had
taken more than two Centuries to accumulate, in one year, would you
have approved?
If George W. Bush had then proposed to DOUBLE the National Debt AGAIN
within 10 years, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had spent more than All the Presidents combined
since George Washington, would you have approved?
So, tell me again, what is it about Barack Hussein Obama that makes
him so brilliant and impressive? Can't think of anything?
Ray Fischer
Been tried and failed.
>And the worst thing is that Obama's destruction of the economy is
>deliberate.
Rightard rule#1: lie, lie again, lie more, lie about lying.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
Ray Fischer
The dumbass rightard doesn't even know when Obama took office.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
Way Back Jack
Bush last effective 10/08 ---- 6.5%
Way Back Jack
Regs have been in effect since the 60s and have done nothing but
grown, grown, grown.
To the detriment of the US.
Way Back Jack
AnAbsoluteT...@WhiteHouse.gov (Way Back Jack) wrote:
>
>Bush last effective 10/08 ---- 6.5%
Nigger promised it wouldn't top 8%.
Ray Fischer
>Regs have been in effect since the 60s and have done nothing but
>grown, grown, grown.
Regulations have always been in effect, rightard. A lot of them were
created in the 1930s to prevent another depression.
>To the detriment of the US.
Because the depression was so much better for the US. It really
helped people to lose ALL of their savings when banks failed.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
Ray Fischer
>Bush last effective 10/08 ---- 6.5%
Unemployment rates
4/2008: 5%
11/2008: 6.9%
2/2009: 8:2% (Bush leaves office)
(most sane people will spot the tend as Bush completes his term)
10/2009: 10.1%
3/2010: 9.7%
Well looky that: Obama takes office and, just a few months later, the
trend has changed. Unemployment isn't going up.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
Way Back Jack
Regs have grown over the years, fishgutz.
They now smother the free mkt. system.
Obama wants overkill.
He wants to destroy freedom in favor of a govt.-run country.
Way Back Jack
Bush's last effective month in office 10/08= 6.6%
Messiah takes over, economy declines.
10% today.
Despite massive govt.-hiring including Census workers.
Black unemployment 25%, just like 1930s.
Democrats - Party Of Parasites
Oh? California, Nevada and Michigan would certainly disagree
with you. How about those new factories that Obama gave GM the
green light to build outside of the United States? When will
those jobs be coming back to the good old USA, raytard?
Note that states with high levels of government welfare teat
suckers had relatively minor changes in unemployment rates
because the leeching pets of liberal politicians were already
drawing their unearned stipends in comfort.
Unemployment Rates for States
Monthly Rankings
Seasonally Adjusted
May 2010p
Rank State Rate
1 NORTH DAKOTA 3.6
2 SOUTH DAKOTA 4.6
3 NEBRASKA 4.9
4 VERMONT 6.2
5 NEW HAMPSHIRE 6.4
6 KANSAS 6.5
7 HAWAII 6.6
8 OKLAHOMA 6.7
9 IOWA 6.8
10 LOUISIANA 6.9
11 MINNESOTA 7.0
11 WYOMING 7.0
13 VIRGINIA 7.1
14 MARYLAND 7.2
14 MONTANA 7.2
16 UTAH 7.3
17 ARKANSAS 7.7
18 COLORADO 8.0
18 MAINE 8.0
20 WISCONSIN 8.2
21 ALASKA 8.3
21 NEW YORK 8.3
21 TEXAS 8.3
24 NEW MEXICO 8.4
25 DELAWARE 8.8
26 CONNECTICUT 8.9
26 WEST VIRGINIA 8.9
28 IDAHO 9.0
29 PENNSYLVANIA 9.1
29 WASHINGTON 9.1
31 MASSACHUSETTS 9.2
32 MISSOURI 9.3
33 ARIZONA 9.6
34 NEW JERSEY 9.7
35 INDIANA 10.0
36 GEORGIA 10.2
37 NORTH CAROLINA 10.3
38 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 10.4
38 KENTUCKY 10.4
38 TENNESSEE 10.4
41 OREGON 10.6
42 OHIO 10.7
43 ALABAMA 10.8
43 ILLINOIS 10.8
45 SOUTH CAROLINA 11.0
46 MISSISSIPPI 11.4
47 FLORIDA 11.7
48 RHODE ISLAND 12.3
49 CALIFORNIA 12.4
50 MICHIGAN 13.6
51 NEVADA 14.0
> --
> Ray Fischer
> rfis...@sonic.net
Ray Fischer
On December 19, 2008, President Bush used his executive authority
to declare that TARP funds may be spent on any program he
personally deems necessary to avert the financial crisis. This has
allowed President Bush to extend the use of TARP funds to support
the auto industry
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
Ray Fischer
>In article <4c282eea$0$1584$742e...@news.sonic.net>
>rfis...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>
>> Way Back Jack <AnAbsoluteT...@WhiteHouse.gov> wrote:
>> >Bush last effective 10/08 ---- 6.5%
>>
>> Unemployment rates
>> 4/2008: 5%
>> 11/2008: 6.9%
>> 2/2009: 8:2% (Bush leaves office)
>> (most sane people will spot the tend as Bush completes his term)
>> 10/2009: 10.1%
>> 3/2010: 9.7%
>>
>> Well looky that: Obama takes office and, just a few months later, the
>> trend has changed. Unemployment isn't going up.
>
>Oh? California, Nevada and Michigan would certainly disagree
Rightard rule #1: lie, lie again, lie more, lie about lying.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
ObamaNation=Abomination
All the libs, including Obammy, were in favor of it.
It was bipartisan, fishgutz.
Ray Fischer
>All the libs, including Obammy, were in favor of it.
>It was bipartisan, fishgutz.
You lied. Now you're making excuses.
Typical rightard bigot.
ObamaNation=Abomination
Obama Sticker Shock
President Obama's 2010 budget looks more astounding by the day,
especially when someone other than the White House budget office is
analyzing it. The latest case of epic sticker shock came Friday when
the Congressional Budget Office published its assessment, which found
that the proposals would increase the federal deficit by $2.3 trillion
more over 10 years than the White House had claimed.
AP.Hey, what's a little rounding error among friends?
Mr. Obama keeps saying he has "inherited a trillion dollar deficit,"
which is true. But he's hardly an innocent bystander. CBO shows that
the President is seeing that $1 trillion and raising it again and
again, as far as the eye can see. In only two months, since the last
CBO budget review in January, Democrats have passed laws that increase
spending by $134 billion in the last six months of this fiscal year
alone, and $1.2 trillion over the next 10 years. And that's all before
his 2010 budget proposals.
The White House responded that CBO, which is also now run by
Democrats, has a more pessimistic economic forecast than do White
House economists. But not by much. CBO expects growth this year to
decline by 3%, while the White House's rosy scenario has it falling by
only 1.2%. Both predict roughly the same growth rates in 2010 (2.9%
for CBO vs. 3.2% for the White House) and 2011 (both 4%).
The big difference between the two guesstimates is in spending, with
CBO calculating that Mr. Obama's proposals will increase federal
outlays by $1.7 trillion more than the White House projects.
Entitlement spending -- Medicare, Medicaid, and so on -- will increase
by $1.1 trillion. In 2009 and 2010 alone, CBO estimates that Mr.
Obama's budget will increase spending by $347 billion more than the
White House claims.
As a share of GDP, CBO says this means spending will hit an astounding
28.5% in fiscal 2009, which ends this September, and still be at 25.5%
next year, staying at close to 23% to 24% of the economy for the next
decade. As CBO dryly notes, this is "above the average of 20.7 percent
over the past 40 years." Even CBO's estimate is conservative because
it assumes that most of the spending in the stimulus bill will be
temporary, though Democrats are already planning to make much of it a
permanent part of the budget baseline.
.Where does this take the Obama budget deficit? Up into the great
beyond. This year's deficit will hit 13.1% of GDP and next year's will
still be at 9.6%, assuming a healthy recovery, and then never get
below 4.1% for the entire decade. These deficits assume the passage of
Mr. Obama's enormous tax increases in 2011 and $629 billion in new
cap-and-tax carbon revenues. The share of debt held by the public will
double -- to 82.4% in 2019 from 40.8% in 2008 (see nearby chart).
And by the way, all of this is without including the costs of Mr.
Obama's plan to offer "free" health care for the middle class. The
White House budget includes only a "down payment" on health care, with
every serious person figuring it will cost at least $1.2 trillion, and
probably more. Incredibly, Democrats on Capitol Hill are, with White
House encouragement, talking about jamming health care through
Congress with a special procedure that requires only 50 Senate votes.
At least after World War II, spending could, and did, decline rapidly
when the country demobilized. In this case, with the bulk of federal
spending geared toward income maintenance and transfer payments that
have political constituencies, that won't happen. And that is part of
Mr. Obama's plan. One unstated but clearly implicit goal of his budget
is to put in place spending programs that make ever-more Americans
dependent on government and that will require a permanently higher
level of taxation to finance. All of this is being done in the name of
addressing income inequality.
Republicans have an obligation to slow down this express train to a
European welfare state, and to educate Americans so that they put
pressure on Democrats who claim to be deficit hawks. If this budget
passes in anything close to Mr. Obama's form, Republicans will spend
the next two or three generations doing little more than collecting
higher taxes from the middle class to finance the Obama revolution.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123776518094909023.html
Shall not be infringed
> Dumbass rightard<parasi...@democrats.org> wrote:
> >In article <4c282eea$0$1584$742ec...@news.sonic.net>
> >rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>
> >> Way Back Jack <AnAbsoluteTurdDwell...@WhiteHouse.gov> wrote:
> >> >Bush last effective 10/08 ---- 6.5%
>
> >> Unemployment rates
> >> 4/2008: 5%
> >> 11/2008: 6.9%
> >> 2/2009: 8:2% (Bush leaves office)
> >> (most sane people will spot the tend as Bush completes his term)
> >> 10/2009: 10.1%
> >> 3/2010: 9.7%
>
> >> Well looky that: Obama takes office and, just a few months later, the
> >> trend has changed. Unemployment isn't going up.
>
> >Oh? California, Nevada and Michigan would certainly disagree
>
> Rightard rule #1: lie, lie again, lie more, lie about lying.
The Ohio number is correct.
Ray Fischer
Coffee in Madrid
happy@home. (Sleazy Nancy) wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 22:11:33 -0400, Deaf Power <de...@power.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 23:15:07 GMT, DumpObama@ImmediatelyIfNotSooner.
> >(waybackjack) wrote:
> >
> >>nigger
> >
> >Spoken like a racist. All neoclowns are racists anyway.
> >
> >
> You apparently went to one of the govt.-run schools that ignore
> reading, writing, and arithmetic in favor of indoctrinating the kiddos
> in left wing political correctness.
>
> Otherwise, you'd know that 10% unemployment (Obama) is higher than
> 6.5% unemployment (Bush).
>
> Duh.
Bush had the illusion of a healthy economy to wrok with.
Obama does not have this luxury.
Coffee in Wash-ington
CB
9E5D19.19460915072010@[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net]:
> In article <4c260f7d....@free.teranews.net>,
> happy@home. (Sleazy Nancy) wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 22:11:33 -0400, Deaf Power <de...@power.com>
wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 23:15:07 GMT, DumpObama@ImmediatelyIfNotSooner.
>> >(waybackjack) wrote:
>> >
>> >>nigger
>> >
>> >Spoken like a racist. All neoclowns are racists anyway.
>> >
>> >
>> You apparently went to one of the govt.-run schools that ignore
>> reading, writing, and arithmetic in favor of indoctrinating the
kiddos
>> in left wing political correctness.
>>
>> Otherwise, you'd know that 10% unemployment (Obama) is higher than
>> 6.5% unemployment (Bush).
>>
>> Duh.
>
You're an idiot
Record Glenn Beck tonight, that is if you have an ounce of intelectual
curiosity.
What Obama's created is Hell on Earth
Coffee in Madrid
wrote:
Glenn Beck real intelligent kinda guy... riiiiggght.
> What Obama's created is Hell on Earth
You want him to be replaced and the GOP do what, exactly ??