http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/441-occupy/11349-focus-occupys-
liberation-from-liberalism
Occupy's Liberation From Liberalism
By David Graeber, Guardian UK
09 May 12
Occupy Wall Street: Take the Bull by the Horns
he US press seems to have decided that the Occupy movement is no longer a
story. Pretty much no matter what we do. In New York, on May Day,
something between 50,000 and 100,000 people marched through the streets –
we don't know the exact numbers because most papers didn't report the
event at all, and therefore, didn't bother to make estimates. In
California, there were blockades and walkouts. In Seattle, one band of
protestors relived the famous Black Bloc actions of November 1999,
smashing many of the same corporate windows – and even that didn't make
national news!
But in a way it hardly matters. Occupy is shedding its liberal accretions
and rapidly turning into something with much deeper roots, creating
alliances that promise to transform the very notion of revolutionary
politics in America.
During the first two months of the occupation, camps emerged in every
city in America, there was an explosion of press attention, and, at the
same time, a vast influx of money (at one point, OWS in New York was
sitting on over $0.5m, almost all of it from donations of under $100
each). Those months also saw a veritable invasion from liberal groups,
ranging from Rebuild the Dream to MoveOn.org. Before long, occupiers
realized the help was threatening to destroy them; meetings became
bureaucratized as they turned into endless squabbles about money; paid
organizers with agendas often very different than the original occupiers
were infiltrating and trying to turn the movement towards much more
conventional political or electoral campaigns.
Then came the evictions.
There is a traditional terms of alliance between liberals and radicals in
American social movements: through civil disobedience and direct action,
the radicals create a fire on the liberals' left that makes them seem
relevant as a moderate alternative; the liberals keep us out of jail. In
this case, the liberals spectacularly failed.
Over the winter, rather than making an issue of the extraordinary illegal
violence of the evictions, they chose, instead, to create an almost
histrionic moral crisis over a few broken windows in Oakland months
before. But when OWS re-emerged in the spring, the abandonment of the
liberals, the drying-up of the money, have become an almost miraculous
blessing. Activists have honed and polished their street tactics and
democratic process. New alliances have been created, with community
groups, immigrant rights organizations, and, increasingly, labor unions.
One reason OWS agreed to forgo mass civil disobedience in New York on 1
May was to solidify those alliances. Instead, occupiers working within
the coalition pushed – with the boisterous support of many rank and file,
despite the initial hesitation of some union leadership – for a joint
solidarity statement that called not just for the usual battle against
austerity, but to the revolutionary transformation of society:
"For centuries, May Day has been a time when the stirrings of spring
lead people of good will towards visions of revolutionary renewal. The
powerful wish to take these dreams away from us. They never will. And so
it is on this May Day, in the wake of a growing planetary uprising for
justice, we dare to look forward to a world when the borders that divide
us will be made meaningless, to the birth of genuinely democratic culture
of communities managing their own resources for the common good, and
where the value and dignity of no human being on this planet is
considered inferior to any other."
For representatives of New York's Health and Transit Workers, not to
mention its Central Labor Council, to sign on to such a statement is
epochal. America is one of the few countries where May Day, the
International Workers' Day, is not even a holiday – ironically enough,
considering the fact the date was chosen to commemorate events that
occurred in Chicago, during the struggle for the 8-hour day in 1886.
During the cold war, the idea of unions signing on to a statement like
this would have been inconceivable: in the 1960s, unionized workers were
known physically attack Wall Street protestors in the name of patriotic
anti-communism. But the collapse of state socialism has made new
alliances possible, and, in making common cause with occupiers, and the
immigrant groups that first turned May Day into a national day of action
in 2006, working-class organizations are also beginning to return to
their roots—up to and including, the ideas and visions of the Haymarket
martyrs themselves.
The words might be diplomatically chosen, but there's no mistaking what
tradition is being invoked here. In endorsing a vision of universal
equality, of the dissolution of national borders, and democratic self-
governing communities, nurses, bus drivers, and construction workers at
the heart of America's greatest capitalist metropolis are signing on to
the vision, if not the tactics, of revolutionary anarchism.
--
Subscribe:
zepps_essay...@yahoogroups.com
zepps_news...@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe:
zepps_essays...@yahoogroups.com
zepps_news-...@yahoogroups.com
Not dead, in jail or a slave? Thank a liberal!