Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

#Horrific Injuries Linked to BP Dispersant Corexit

2 views
Skip to first unread message

2966 Dead

unread,
May 14, 2012, 1:44:00 PM5/14/12
to
http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/344-208/11417-horrific-
injuries-linked-to-bp-dispersant-corexit

Horrific Injuries Linked to BP Dispersant Corexit

By Cameron Langford, Courthouse News Service

14 May 12



Exposure to chemical dispersants BP used in the Gulf of Mexico oil spill
left a commercial diver with seizures, unable to walk and going blind -
and two members of his dive team committed suicide, the man claims in
Harris County Court.

David Hogan and his wife sued BP and NALCO Co. - which made the Corexit
oil dispersants - and a host of other defendants, including Halliburton,
Transocean, ConocoPhillips, Xplore Oil & Gas and Stuyvesant Dredging Co.

After BP's Deepwater Horizon oil rig exploded on April 20, 2010,
unleashing the worst oil spill in U.S. history, BP hired contractors to
spray and inject more than 1.8 million gallons of Corexit into the Gulf
of Mexico, according to the complaint.

"Between June 1, 2010 and the end of November, 2010, David Hogan
performed commercial diving work from boats and vessels that were owned,
leased, chartered, contracted for, and/or under the direction and control
of Specialty Offshore, ConocoPhillips, Xplore Oil, and the Stuyvesant
defendants in the navigable water of the Gulf of Mexico. On every one of
those dives during that period of time, David Hogan dove into waters that
were contaminated with both the crude oil and the Corexit® dispersants,"
the complaint states.

Hogan says that on his first dive, in June 2010, "he immediately noticed
that something was different from his prior diving experiences," and that
"the oil seemed to have sunk considerably deeper into the depths of the
Gulf waters than he had ever seen or experienced before. He immediately
terminated his dive and returned to the surface, only to find that his
wetsuit looked entirely different than it had ever looked before when he
had dived into waters with an oil spill."

Hogan says neither ConocoPhillips nor Specialty Offshore provided him or
his team with any information about NALCO's Corexit dispersants.

"Expressing concern for the safety of himself and his dive team, he
contacted the ConocoPhillips onsite supervisor, who gave him a 'BP
Hotline' to call if people had any concerns with respect to health and
safety," according to the complaint.

"Upon calling that number, a person answered, identifying themselves as
being with BP. After expressing his concern with respect to what he had
seen and experienced during his brief dive, that BP spokesperson told Mr.
Hogan there was nothing for him to be concerned about, but that he would
have one of BP's health and safety people come out to the ConocoPhillips
platform to talk to Mr. Hogan and his dive team.

"Within the hour, a helicopter landed on the platform and a man who
introduced himself as being a BP representative got out of the helicopter
came over to talk to Mr. Hogan.

"BP's 'health and safety man' represented and assured Mr. Hogan and his
dive that, notwithstanding the fact that they would be diving and
spending a considerable amount of time in the Deepwater Horizon's oil
spill, there was absolutely nothing harmful or hazardous to their safety
or health in the oil, in the water, or whatever was causing the oil to
sink so deep beneath the surface.

"In fact, when this case is tried, the evidence will show that this BP
'health and safety man' made Mr. Hogan feel as though it was foolish for
Mr. Hogan to have called at all, and it seemed as if the BP 'health and
safety man' had wasted his time flying all the way out to where Mr. Hogan
and his dive team were located, for such a trivial matter.

"Mr. Hogan and the BP 'health and safety man' specifically talked about
whether Mr. Hogan and his dive team would need to change to 'haz-mat'
dive gear if there was a concern for safety and health in what was in the
water and oil spill; however, the BP 'health and safety man' reassured
Mr. Hogan that 'haz-mat' diving gear was not necessary since there was
absolutely nothing in the oil or anything mixed with the oil that was
hazardous or of any concern, from a health standpoint to Mr. Hogan and
his dive crew.

"Based on that information," Hogan says, he and his crew worked 18- to 20-
hour days for the next 1 to 2 weeks, in water that was "consistently
contaminated with oil for a considerable distance below the surface."
Hogan says the water also was contaminated with Corexit.

He and his team worked in the oil- and Corexit-contaminated water for 5
months for a variety of defendants, Hogan says, including ConocoPhillips,
Xplore Oil & Gas and Stuyvesant Dredging.

"Again, at the end of each diving day, Mr. Hogan and his dive team's
wetsuits would look like something they had never seen before prior to
starting these diving operations back in June 2010," the complaint states.

Hogan says at least one team member started having health problems before
they finished their work for Stuyvesant Dredging.

"Two of the dive team members have since committed suicide," the
complaint states.

Hogan says due to the assurances they got from BP's "health and safety
man," they did not initially blame their health problems on the
contaminated waters.

"However, as Mr. Hogan's health problems progressed and did not abate, he
ultimately contacted a physician in Louisiana who had been treating
hundreds of patients who had come into contact with the oil and Corexit®
dispersants," according to the complaint.

"By August, 2011, medical testing and medical evaluation by one or more
physicians familiar with exposure to the oil spill and, particularly,
exposure to the Corexit® dispersants, led physicians to inform Mr. Hogan
that his progressing medical problems were caused by the contact with the
oil spill during his diving operations between June and November, 2010.

"Through additional testing and medical evaluation, by November 16, 2011,
Mr. Hogan had been diagnosed as suffering from neurotoxicity 'related to
chronic and cumulative exposure to chemical and heavy metals associated
with the Gulf oil spill and dispersant.'

"At this time, Mr. Hogan is suffering from a myriad of health issues
related to his exposure to the oil spill and NALCO Corexit® dispersants,
including but not limited to the fact that he cannot walk, his vision has
progressed to being legally blind in his left eye and his most recent eye
examination shows that he continues to lose sight in his right eye, and
for all intents and purposes, is a paraplegic."

Hogan says that before his exposure to the chemicals he "was a very
gregarious, healthy man" who climbed 14,400-foot Mount Rainier in May
2010.

"Since November 2010, he has lost 60 pounds and is wheelchair-bound. If
that were not enough,

David has also suffered cognitive problems, seizures, vertigo," the
complaint states. (Graph 63)

Hogan says he is rapidly losing vision in his right eye.

Named as defendants are British Petroleum Exploration & Production Inc.;
BP America Inc.; BP America Production Company; BP Products North America
Inc.; BP plc; Halliburton Energy Services Inc.; Transocean Ltd.;
Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc.; Transocean Deepwater Inc.;
Transocean Holdings LLC; NALCO Company; Specialty Offshore Inc.;
ConocoPhillps; Xplore Oil & Gas LLC; Stuyvesant Dredging Company; and
Stuyvesant Dredging Inc.

Transocean owned the Deepwater Horizon rig; Halliburton performed cement
work on the Macondo well beneath the rig before the blowout.

Hogan seeks punitive damages for gross negligence and negligence under
general maritime law and the Jones Act, from NALCO for products liability
under general maritime law, and punitive damages for past and future
physical pain and suffering, past and future mental pain, suffering and
anguish, past and future medical bills and lost wages.

He and his wife are represented by Craig Lewis, of Houston

--
Subscribe:
zepps_essay...@yahoogroups.com
zepps_news...@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe:
zepps_essays...@yahoogroups.com
zepps_news-...@yahoogroups.com

Not dead, in jail or a slave? Thank a liberal!

Obama is a War Criminal

unread,
May 14, 2012, 1:52:29 PM5/14/12
to
More lies from an idiot
Message has been deleted

2966 Dead

unread,
May 14, 2012, 9:34:23 PM5/14/12
to
On Mon, 14 May 2012 18:55:08 -0400, Mr.B1ack wrote:

> 2966 Dead <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>
>>http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/344-208/11417-horrific-
>>injuries-linked-to-bp-dispersant-corexit
>>
>>Horrific Injuries Linked to BP Dispersant Corexit By Cameron Langford,
>>Courthouse News Service 14 May 12
>>
>>Exposure to chemical dispersants BP used in the Gulf of Mexico oil spill
>>left a commercial diver with seizures, unable to walk and going blind -
>>and two members of his dive team committed suicide, the man claims in
>>Harris County Court.
>
> "Claims" .....

That's what you call when you're filing a suit.

I realize that Republican justice doesn't work like that. All lawsuits
filed by non-Republicans are frivolous, right?
>
> Too much cheap moonshine will do that to you as well.
>
> Corexit 9527 contains 2-butoxyethanol and propylene glycol... but
> those are also used in cosmetics and soaps.

Yeah, yeah, and hydrogen cyanide contains hydrogen, which is not toxic.
>
> Corexit 9500a contains de-sulfurized light hydrocarbons and propylene
> glycol ... the former probably stinks like kerosene but ought not be
> especially neurotoxic unless you're subsituting it for vermouth in
> yer martinis. Also included are succinic acid (used for pH control in
> medicines) and sorbitan (dehydrated sorbitol) a surfactant.
>
> Both contain an unspecified "organic sufonate" which, if there's ANY
> problem, is probably THE problem because such compounds can
> facilitate other organic reactions, including biochemical.
>
> The only alternative agent availible in adequate quantities for the
> spill was "Sea Brat 4" which BP rejected because it breaks down into
> toxic nonylphenol under certain conditions likely to be found in
> southern waters (plus perhaps that BP doesn't make the stuff and
> would thus pay more).
>
> (wikipedia)
>
> OR ... they coulda just let the oil spread until it covered the
> entire gulf of Mexico and gummed up every bird and fish. You'd have
> probably like that better because it would make 'Big Oil' look more
> evil ...... MUCH more important than the birds and fish and people
> .............

Message has been deleted

Dänk 42Ø

unread,
May 15, 2012, 11:11:41 PM5/15/12
to
On Mon, 14 May 2012 17:44:00 +0000, 2966 Dead wrote:

> http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/344-208/11417-horrific-
> injuries-linked-to-bp-dispersant-corexit
>
> Horrific Injuries Linked to BP Dispersant Corexit
>
> By Cameron Langford, Courthouse News Service
>
> 14 May 12
>
>
>
> Exposure to chemical dispersants BP used in the Gulf of Mexico oil spill
> left a commercial diver with seizures, unable to walk and going blind -
> and two members of his dive team committed suicide, the man claims in
> Harris County Court.

If the chemical made people more likely to vote Democrat you'd be
demanding the government add it to the water supply.

Dänk 42Ø

unread,
May 15, 2012, 11:23:50 PM5/15/12
to
On Mon, 14 May 2012 18:55:08 -0400, Mr.B1ack wrote:

> 2966 Dead <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>
>>http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/344-208/11417-horrific-
>>injuries-linked-to-bp-dispersant-corexit
>>
>>Horrific Injuries Linked to BP Dispersant Corexit By Cameron Langford,
>>Courthouse News Service 14 May 12
>>
>>Exposure to chemical dispersants BP used in the Gulf of Mexico oil spill
>>left a commercial diver with seizures, unable to walk and going blind -
>>and two members of his dive team committed suicide, the man claims in
>>Harris County Court.
>
> "Claims" .....
>
> Too much cheap moonshine will do that to you as well.
>
> Corexit 9527 contains 2-butoxyethanol and propylene glycol... but
> those are also used in cosmetics and soaps.
>
> Corexit 9500a contains de-sulfurized light hydrocarbons and propylene
> glycol ... the former probably stinks like kerosene but ought not be
> especially neurotoxic unless you're subsituting it for vermouth in
> yer martinis. Also included are succinic acid (used for pH control in
> medicines) and sorbitan (dehydrated sorbitol) a surfactant.
>
> Both contain an unspecified "organic sufonate" which, if there's ANY
> problem, is probably THE problem because such compounds can
> facilitate other organic reactions, including biochemical.
>
> The only alternative agent availible in adequate quantities for the
> spill was "Sea Brat 4" which BP rejected because it breaks down into
> toxic nonylphenol under certain conditions likely to be found in
> southern waters (plus perhaps that BP doesn't make the stuff and
> would thus pay more).
>
> (wikipedia)
>
> OR ... they coulda just let the oil spread until it covered the
> entire gulf of Mexico and gummed up every bird and fish. You'd have
> probably like that better because it would make 'Big Oil' look more
> evil ...... MUCH more important than the birds and fish and people
> .............

I don't know if the dispersants helped, but scientists believe that
circular ocean currents and warm water kept the oil confined to the Gulf
and allowed bacteria to break it down.

Anthropomorphism causes us to assign human attributes to other species,
meaning we assume that because petroleum is toxic to humans, that it is
toxic to all other species. In fact, much of the fuss over the BP oil
spill was over the contamination of the shellfish that humans harvest and
sell for profit.

There is some evidence that the local ecology was damaged by the spill,
but the area has not become the dead zone that environmentalists
predicted. Bacteria wound up breaking down most of the oil; the
hydrocarbons that humans use for powering machines can also be used by
bacteria as food. Circular currents prevented the oil from leaving the
Gulf, giving bacteria a chance to break down as much of it as possible.
By sinking the oil, dispersants may have helped the process, otherwise
much of the oil may have floated into the Atlantic, where dilution and
colder temperatures would have prevented significant bacterial breakdown.

Dänk 42Ø

unread,
May 15, 2012, 11:28:30 PM5/15/12
to
On Tue, 15 May 2012 01:34:23 +0000, 2966 Dead quacked:

> On Mon, 14 May 2012 18:55:08 -0400, Mr.B1ack wrote:
>
>> 2966 Dead <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>>
>>>http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/344-208/11417-horrific-
>>>injuries-linked-to-bp-dispersant-corexit
>>>
>>>Horrific Injuries Linked to BP Dispersant Corexit By Cameron Langford,
>>>Courthouse News Service 14 May 12
>>>
>>>Exposure to chemical dispersants BP used in the Gulf of Mexico oil
>>>spill left a commercial diver with seizures, unable to walk and going
>>>blind - and two members of his dive team committed suicide, the man
>>>claims in Harris County Court.
>>
>> "Claims" .....
>
> That's what you call when you're filing a suit.
>
> I realize that Republican justice doesn't work like that. All lawsuits
> filed by non-Republicans are frivolous, right?

How is that you are able to change every subject into a rant about
Republicans? I don't care for Republicans (or Democrats) myself, but I
do not let my dislike of them consume my entire life. But you don't have
a life: You ate too many lead paint chips as a kid, and this combined
with way too many acid trips as a teenager has turned you into a raving
lunatic. At least Ted could compose a coherent paragraph.

de...@dudu.org

unread,
May 16, 2012, 8:48:32 AM5/16/12
to
On Tue, 15 May 2012 22:11:41 -0500, Dänk 42Ø <da...@purpleurkle.org>
wrote:
Education is what makes people more likely to vote Democrat

2966 Dead

unread,
May 16, 2012, 10:28:20 AM5/16/12
to
Danky is well over a thousand miles from the Gulf, so it's not his
problem.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

2966 Dead

unread,
May 16, 2012, 6:39:44 PM5/16/12
to
On Wed, 16 May 2012 16:53:08 -0400, Mr.B1ack wrote:
> I dunno ... those 'occupiers' seem pretty ignorant .... :-)

Compared to whom? Yourself?
Message has been deleted
0 new messages