The first major announcement by President Kerry will be a sorry admission that the budget deficit is too big to enact any of his promised middle-class tax cuts. Instead, Kerry will have to raise taxes on almost all Americans in order to fund his "investments", otherwise known as spending.
Luckily for us, I don't think this plan will make it through the House of Representatives and Chairman Thomas of Ways and Means, assuming the GOP retains control. Overall, a little governmental gridlock wouldn't be the worst thing...
In article <4120c739$0$5893$61fed...@news.rcn.com>,
BrianEWilliams <Sorry_No_Em...@Yahoo.com> wrote: >The first major announcement by President Kerry will be a sorry admission >that the budget deficit is too big to enact any of his promised middle-class >tax cuts. Instead, Kerry will have to raise taxes on almost all Americans >in order to fund his "investments", otherwise known as spending.
At least he will mention the budget deficit. Bush is so ashamed of his $500,000,000,000 annual deficit that he just lies about it.
> The first major announcement by President Kerry will be a sorry admission > that the budget deficit is too big to enact any of his promised middle-class > tax cuts. Instead, Kerry will have to raise taxes on almost all Americans > in order to fund his "investments", otherwise known as spending.
> Luckily for us, I don't think this plan will make it through the House of > Representatives and Chairman Thomas of Ways and Means, assuming the GOP > retains control. Overall, a little governmental gridlock wouldn't be the > worst thing...
>The first major announcement by President Kerry will be a sorry admission >that the budget deficit is too big to enact any of his promised middle-class >tax cuts. Instead, Kerry will have to raise taxes on almost all Americans >in order to fund his "investments", otherwise known as spending.
>Luckily for us, I don't think this plan will make it through the House of >Representatives and Chairman Thomas of Ways and Means, assuming the GOP >retains control. Overall, a little governmental gridlock wouldn't be the >worst thing...
> Rick (Richard Allen) Hohensee > independant candidate for President
> humbu...@smart.net > >The first major announcement by President Kerry will be a sorry admission > >that the budget deficit is too big to enact any of his promised middle-class > >tax cuts. Instead, Kerry will have to raise taxes on almost all Americans > >in order to fund his "investments", otherwise known as spending.
> >Luckily for us, I don't think this plan will make it through the House of > >Representatives and Chairman Thomas of Ways and Means, assuming the GOP > >retains control. Overall, a little governmental gridlock wouldn't be the > >worst thing...
> The first major announcement by President Kerry will be a sorry admission > that the budget deficit is too big to enact any of his promised middle-class > tax cuts. Instead, Kerry will have to raise taxes on almost all Americans > in order to fund his "investments", otherwise known as spending.
What do you base that upon? LOL You base it on your experience with Bush who said he wouldn't lead us into deficit spending and lied.
> The first major announcement by President Kerry will be a sorry admission > that the budget deficit is too big to enact any of his promised middle-class > tax cuts. Instead, Kerry will have to raise taxes on almost all Americans > in order to fund his "investments", otherwise known as spending. > Luckily for us, I don't think this plan will make it through the House of > Representatives and Chairman Thomas of Ways and Means, assuming the GOP > retains control. Overall, a little governmental gridlock wouldn't be the > worst thing...
And then he will raise money by bailing out of Iraq....
"BrianEWilliams" <Sorry_No_Em...@Yahoo.com> wrote in message news:4120c739$0$5893$61fed72c@news.rcn.com... > The first major announcement by President Kerry will be a sorry admission > that the budget deficit is too big to enact any of his promised middle-class > tax cuts. Instead, Kerry will have to raise taxes on almost all Americans > in order to fund his "investments", otherwise known as spending.
> Luckily for us, I don't think this plan will make it through the House of > Representatives and Chairman Thomas of Ways and Means, assuming the GOP > retains control. Overall, a little governmental gridlock wouldn't be the > worst thing...
> In article <4120c739$0$5893$61fed...@news.rcn.com>, > BrianEWilliams <Sorry_No_Em...@Yahoo.com> wrote: > >The first major announcement by President Kerry will be a sorry admission > >that the budget deficit is too big to enact any of his promised middle-class > >tax cuts. Instead, Kerry will have to raise taxes on almost all Americans > >in order to fund his "investments", otherwise known as spending. > What are Bush's investments, opium production in Afghanistan? No wait, > making Hellaburton more wealthy than Bill Gate's Microdick.
Bush's biggest investment is in America's children. He provided TWICE AS MUCH money to Education as did Clinton.
> > The first major announcement by President Kerry will be a sorry admission > > that the budget deficit is too big to enact any of his promised middle-class > > tax cuts. Instead, Kerry will have to raise taxes on almost all Americans > > in order to fund his "investments", otherwise known as spending. > Isn't that exactly what Clindon did?
Not exactly.
Clinton ALSO promised no new anti-gun laws THEN PROMPTLY put together the so-called assault weapons ban, Brady Bill, etc.
Hmmmmmm.......
Kerry is ALSO promising no new anti-gun laws....
Yet Kerry dashed back to DC a few weeks ago to vote AGAINST cops being armed....
And Kerry voted AGAINST the 2nd Amendment 53 of 54 times......
In article <6u5Uc.21439$SC1.3...@nwrddc03.gnilink.net>,
Crazy Bastard <crazy...@yahoo.com> wrote: >Clinton ALSO promised no new anti-gun laws THEN PROMPTLY put together the >so-called assault weapons ban, Brady Bill, etc.
Clinton white house policies adversely affected one of my hobbies, and because of that, I will NOT vote for Bill Clinton for president EVER again.
> The first major announcement by President Kerry will be a sorry admission > that the budget deficit is too big to enact any of his promised middle-class > tax cuts. Instead, Kerry will have to raise taxes on almost all Americans > in order to fund his "investments", otherwise known as spending.
> Luckily for us, I don't think this plan will make it through the House of > Representatives and Chairman Thomas of Ways and Means, assuming the GOP > retains control. Overall, a little governmental gridlock wouldn't be the > worst thing...
> -- > BrianEWilliams
He'd better not say "read my lips". We know where that goes.
"abracadabra" <a...@hotmail.com> wrote in message <news:jT3Uc.27298$Jp6.15697@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>... > "BrianEWilliams" <Sorry_No_Em...@Yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:4120c739$0$5893$61fed72c@news.rcn.com... > > The first major announcement by President Kerry will be a sorry admission > > that the budget deficit is too big to enact any of his promised > middle-class > > tax cuts. Instead, Kerry will have to raise taxes on almost all Americans > > in order to fund his "investments", otherwise known as spending.
> What do you base that upon? > LOL > You base it on your experience with Bush who said he wouldn't lead us into > deficit spending and lied.
One might base the idea that the poster posits by going back and looking at what the last Democrat running for a first term as president promised. In 1992 the candidate Bill Clinton promised middle class tax relief, when he got in he passed the biggest tax hike in US history.
You got to admit that Kerry has a proclivity to do the same thing. His numbers for spending do not add up anymore than those of Bush's do.
>>>The first major announcement by President Kerry will be a sorry admission >>>that the budget deficit is too big to enact any of his promised
>> middle-class
>>>tax cuts. Instead, Kerry will have to raise taxes on almost all Americans >>>in order to fund his "investments", otherwise known as spending.
>>What do you base that upon? >>LOL >>You base it on your experience with Bush who said he wouldn't lead us into >>deficit spending and lied.
> One might base the idea that the poster posits by going back and > looking at what the last Democrat running for a first term as > president promised. In 1992 the candidate Bill Clinton promised > middle class tax relief, when he got in he passed the biggest tax hike > in US history.
It wasn't the biggest tax hike in US history. YOu are a fucking idiot.
You could prove you are not a fucking idiot by proving through FACTS and STATISTICS that it was the biggest tax hike in history.
"abracadabra" <a...@hotmail.com> wrote in message <news:jT3Uc.27298$Jp6.15697@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>... > "BrianEWilliams" <Sorry_No_Em...@Yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:4120c739$0$5893$61fed72c@news.rcn.com... > > The first major announcement by President Kerry will be a sorry admission > > that the budget deficit is too big to enact any of his promised > middle-class > > tax cuts. Instead, Kerry will have to raise taxes on almost all Americans > > in order to fund his "investments", otherwise known as spending.
> Monsieur Kérry wrote: > > He will OUTSOURCE our national defense to the Socialist board of malfeasance > > over at the United Nations > What a stupid statement
Kerry has ALREADY flip-flopped on that very issue....
> In article <6u5Uc.21439$SC1.3...@nwrddc03.gnilink.net>, > Crazy Bastard <crazy...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >Clinton ALSO promised no new anti-gun laws THEN PROMPTLY put together the > >so-called assault weapons ban, Brady Bill, etc. > Clinton white house policies adversely affected one of my hobbies, and > because of that, I will NOT vote for Bill Clinton for president EVER
> The first major announcement by President Kerry will be a sorry admission > that the budget deficit is too big to enact any of his promised middle-class > tax cuts. Instead, Kerry will have to raise taxes on almost all Americans > in order to fund his "investments", otherwise known as spending.
> Luckily for us, I don't think this plan will make it through the House of > Representatives and Chairman Thomas of Ways and Means, assuming the GOP > retains control. Overall, a little governmental gridlock wouldn't be the > worst thing...
> > "BrianEWilliams" <Sorry_No_Em...@Yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:4120c739$0$5893$61fed72c@news.rcn.com... > > > The first major announcement by President Kerry will be a sorry admission > > > that the budget deficit is too big to enact any of his promised > > middle-class > > > tax cuts. Instead, Kerry will have to raise taxes on almost all Americans > > > in order to fund his "investments", otherwise known as spending.
> > What do you base that upon? > > LOL > > You base it on your experience with Bush who said he wouldn't lead us into > > deficit spending and lied.
> One might base the idea that the poster posits by going back and > looking at what the last Democrat running for a first term as > president promised. In 1992 the candidate Bill Clinton promised > middle class tax relief, when he got in he passed the biggest tax hike > in US history.
It was Reagan (or Bush, but I'm pretty sure it was Reagan) who pushed through the biggest tax hike in US history.
Its unlikely Kerry would raise taxes at all - just cancel the Bush tax cuts for the ultra rich - that's not a "tax hike".
Anywho, Bush has proven that he and the Republicans are totally incapable of managing a budget. I guess that comes from being born rich and never having to take the consequences of your mistakes.
>>>> He will OUTSOURCE our national defense to the Socialist board of
>> malfeasance
>>>> over at the United Nations
>>> What a stupid statement
>> Well...The UN IS a stupid outfit! >> jt
> Isn't georgiegirl's reason to be in Iraq enforcing UN resolutions
> The UN, while not perfect, is more honorable than georgiegirl could ever > hope to be
He could work through the Arab League or the UN. Arabs need to fix-up Iraq, not U.S. Crusaders. I didn't think Bush has a clue how the Arabs feel about a President who authorizes an invasion of an Arab country and also holds strong out-of-the mainstream Christian values. Bush's see no evil approach with Ariel Sharon has also led to a lot of unnecessary Palestinian bloodshed.
