Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

NEWSMAX Story: Obama Risks a Domestic Military 'Intervention' :: We are talking a coup here and about 50 million would go for it :: And they are worried about a fucin poll about killing Obama!

0 views
Skip to first unread message

US Army Veteran

unread,
Sep 30, 2009, 1:28:13 AM9/30/09
to
John L. Perry
Source: Newsmax

There is a remote, although gaining, possibility America's military will
intervene as a last resort to resolve the "Obama problem."

Don't dismiss it as unrealistic.

America isn't the Third World. If a military coup does occur here it will be
civilized. That it has never happened doesn't mean it wont. Describing what
may be afoot is not to advocate it. So, view the following through military
eyes:

Officers swear to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States
against all enemies, foreign and domestic." Unlike enlisted personnel, they
do not swear to "obey the orders of the president of the United States."

Top military officers can see the Constitution they are sworn to defend
being trampled as American institutions and enterprises are nationalized.

They can see that Americans are increasingly alarmed that this nation, under
President Barack Obama, may not even be recognizable as America by the 2012
election, in which he will surely seek continuation in office.

They can see that the economy - ravaged by deficits, taxes, unemployment,
and impending inflation - is financially reliant on foreign lender
governments.

They can see this president waging undeclared war on the intelligence
community, without whose rigorous and independent functions the armed
services are rendered blind in an ever-more hostile world overseas and at
home.

They can see the dismantling of defenses against missiles targeted at this
nation by avowed enemies, even as America's troop strength is allowed to
sag.

They can see the horror of major warfare erupting simultaneously in two, and
possibly three, far-flung theaters before America can react in time.

They can see the nation's safety and their own military establishments and
honor placed in jeopardy as never before.

So, if you are one of those observant military professionals, what do you
do?

Wait until this president bungles into losing the war in Afghanistan, and
Pakistan's arsenal of nuclear bombs falls into the hands of militant Islam?

Wait until Israel is forced to launch air strikes on Iran's nuclear-bomb
plants, and the Middle East explodes, destabilizing or subjugating the Free
World?

What happens if the generals Obama sent to win the Afghan war are told by
this president (who now says, "I'm not interested in victory") that they
will be denied troops they must have to win? Do they follow orders they
cannot carry out, consistent with their oath of duty? Do they resign en
masse?

Or do they soldier on, hoping the 2010 congressional elections will reverse
the situation? Do they dare gamble the national survival on such political
whims?

Anyone who imagines that those thoughts are not weighing heavily on the
intellect and conscience of America's military leadership is lost in a fool's
fog.

Will the day come when patriotic general and flag officers sit down with the
president, or with those who control him, and work out the national
equivalent of a "family intervention," with some form of limited, shared
responsibility?

Imagine a bloodless coup to restore and defend the Constitution through an
interim administration that would do the serious business of governing and
defending the nation. Skilled, military-trained, nation-builders would
replace accountability-challenged, radical-left commissars. Having bonded
with his twin teleprompters, the president would be detailed for ceremonial
speech-making.

Military intervention is what Obama's exponentially accelerating agenda for
"fundamental change" toward a Marxist state is inviting upon America. A coup
is not an ideal option, but Obama's radical ideal is not acceptable or
reversible.

Unthinkable? Then think up an alternative, non-violent solution to the Obama
problem. Just don't shrug and say, "We can always worry about that later."

from:
http://americangrandjury.org/

Dr. Barry Worthington

unread,
Sep 30, 2009, 6:57:21 AM9/30/09
to
On 30 Sep, 06:28, "US Army Veteran" <inva...@invalid.com> wrote:
> John L. Perry
> Source: Newsmax
>
> There is a remote, although gaining, possibility America's military will
> intervene as a last resort to resolve the "Obama problem."

(Crap snipped.)

There is a word for this. It is called 'treason'. You can be shot for
it.....

Dr. Barry Worthington

5182 Dead, 315 since 1/20/09

unread,
Sep 30, 2009, 9:40:04 AM9/30/09
to

I'm guessing that Homeland Security is already watching our juniour
terrorist here. Only a fool thinks the internet is truly anonymous, and
this idiot has said more than enough for the government to get a warrant
to make his ISP reveal who he is and perhaps even turn over his email.

I suspect he's nothing more than a loud mouthed fool, but if the DHS
decide he actually presents a real risk, he's looking at 5-20 in the
federal pen.

ArmyOfDorkness

unread,
Sep 30, 2009, 2:58:31 PM9/30/09
to

"US Army Veteran" <inv...@invalid.com> wrote in message
news:iNGdnevLo7TscV_X...@giganews.com...


> John L. Perry
> Source: Newsmax

You and this guy are cock sucking traitors. Leave the country now before
people find you and hang you from a tree.

boo-radley

unread,
Sep 30, 2009, 7:57:57 PM9/30/09
to
On Sep 30, 12:58 pm, "ArmyOfDorkness" <DorkAsKni...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> "US Army Veteran" <inva...@invalid.com> wrote in messagenews:iNGdnevLo7TscV_X...@giganews.com...

NewsMAX LOL

Steve

unread,
Sep 30, 2009, 8:24:47 PM9/30/09
to

Keeryst.. When will you ignorant armature lawyers get a clue.. The
guy is a nut, but what he said a long, long way from treason you
hapless fool.


"Just by coincidence, the lottery fell on my birthday. Apollo 13
was about to take off, Chappaquiddick was still a big story, and I was
glued to my transister radio. I drew 345. Barring incredible
catastrope, I could forget about the draft."
--David B.(Zepp) Jamieson Jan 13 1996
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.usa.misc/msg/d3d4e7bc0a427c39?hl=en&

"I was still weighing my options--Canada or jail--the the lottery made
me one of the priviledged lucky. My number, based on my birthday, was
289."
--David B.(Zepp) Jamieson Jan 19 1998
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.elections/msg/39becb675d51d4e9?hl=en&

I drew a lottery number of 325, and never worried about the draft
again, as far as I was concerned.
--David B.(Zepp) Jamieson Aug 23 1999
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/8667b9116a637152?hl=en&

"I was the draft dodger."
--David B.(Zepp) Jamieson Sep 11, 12:08 pm
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/efabf601a6b8837c?hl=en&

0 new messages