Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

US admission of failure

0 views
Skip to first unread message

PakistanPal

unread,
May 14, 2009, 4:53:31 AM5/14/09
to

THE dismissal of the top US and NATO commander in Afghanistan General
David McKiernan, which makes it the second removal from office of such
a high ranking American military official after General Douglas
MacArthur was forced out during the Korean War, could be viewed as a
subtle admission of failure in a war that has lasted longer than
either of the two World Wars. Putting the onus on General McKiernan of
prosecuting the war against an elusive resistance in a conventional
manner implies that the policymakers in the Pentagon also had no clue
how to go about the task. After all, he had been there only for less
than a year, and there has been a steady increase in the number of
American as well as Afghan civilian casualties for a much longer
period, which clearly suggested that the resistance had gradually
become stronger and which, in turn, is evidence of the fact that the
war had been badly conceived, haphazardly managed and poorly assisted
by the allied NATO forces. Apparently, he disagreed about the grounds
that Defence Secretary Robert Gates might have proffered him for
removal from the post; otherwise his military career would not have
ended in such a sudden manner. The dismissal is not warranted by
Secretary Gates' observations, "a new approach was probably in our
best interest... fresh eyes were needed". He has been made a
scapegoat.

The huge surge of troops, as envisaged in the AfPak review, which will
be led by General McKiernan's replacement, Lt Gen Stanley McChrystal,
is hardly a guarantee for reversing the fortunes of war. General
McChrystal might be an expert in conducting an unconventional warfare,
but he is up against a highly motivated resistance and would find
himself placed in a highly complex scenario. The Afghans are a
motivated resistance, who would not countenance foreign occupation and
would rather sacrifice their lives than remain in bondage. They enjoy
the support and sympathy of all freedom-loving people, most of all
their co-ethnics across the border in Pakistan. And that brings us to
another offshoot of the American invasion, the mess in the tribal
areas where a situation has been forced upon Pakistan to fight an
"existential threat".

The US has to realise that the AfPak theatre of war is a sticky
wicket; so the sooner it extricates itself the better for all
involved. Hiding its failures by harping on Pakistan being the "most
dangerous country" in the world would not help matters. It must give
out a definite roadmap to placate the resistance, work out a plan to
reconstruct the battered country and devise a way to install a
government that takes care of ethnic sensitivities. A puppet and
unpopular Pushtun in the person of President Hamid Karzai is likely to
make Afghan sentiments flare, not calm down.

Article Source :
http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/opinion_print/Opinions/Editorials/14-May-2009/US-admission-of-failure

0 new messages