Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
#Limbaugh may have broken Ohio election laws
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 1 - 25 of 63 - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)   Newer >
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
4000 Dead  
View profile  
 More options Mar 25 2008, 6:51 pm
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: 4000 Dead <ze...@finestplanet.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:51:46 -0700
Local: Tues, Mar 25 2008 6:51 pm
Subject: #Limbaugh may have broken Ohio election laws

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/MSNBC_Limbaugh_encouraging_dirty_tricks...

Abrams praises investigation of Limbaugh's Dem primary 'dirty tricks'
David Edwards and Nick Juliano
Published: Tuesday March 25, 2008

This month's primaries in Ohio and Texas resurrected Hillary Clinton
from the political graveyard for the umpteenth time this election
season.

Conservative talker Rush Limbaugh is taking credit for Clinton's
continued presence in the race after encouraging Republican voters to
switch parties before those two big states voted March 4, and he has
called on Pennsylvania GOPers to do the same before their state votes
April 22. Limbaugh's listeners are worried about an election fraud
investigation, which could result in criminal charges for voters in at
least one Ohio county.

MSNBC host Dan Abrams says the right-wing radio host's aim is "to
subvert democracy and inject dirty tricks into the Democratic
nomination process."

"I've said it before, I think it's un-American to encourage people to
vote for a candidate they don't want to win, in order to corrupt the
process," Abrams said. "But in Ohio, it may also be illegal."

He went on to discuss a probe in Cuyahoga County, which includes
Cleveland, where Board of Elections officials are launching an
investigation into crossover voters to determine whether any are
guilty of election fraud, a felony. Results of the investigation will
be released March 31.

It's unlikely that Limbaugh single-handedly swung the results to
Clinton in either state, as was his stated intention. Clinton and her
Democratic rival Barack Obama split Republicans in Ohio, and Obama won
Texas Republicans, according to network exit polls.

In Ohio's Cuyahoga County, which includes Cleveland, the Plain Dealer
reported that a "staggering" 16,000 Republicans switched parties to
vote in the March 4 Democratic primary. Some GOP voters openly
acknowledged their intention to meddle with the opposing party,
writing messages like "For one day only" on pledges voters are
required to sign indicating they will support the party whose primary
they are voting in.

As staggering as the Cuyahoga County figure seemed, exit polls suggest
crossover voters may have been even more prevalent elsewhere in the
state. Nearly 325,000 voters cast a ballot for either Obama or Clinton
in the Cleveland area, so Republicans accounted for about 5 percent of
the Democratic turnout. Statewide, Republicans made up about 9 percent
of the Democratic primary electorate, according to the exit polls.

Obama has touted his support among independents and GOP voters --
so-called Obamacans -- and while some crossover voters told the PD
they voted for Clinton to set up an easy target for John McCain in the
fall, others said they thought Obama would be an easier opponent.
Plenty of Republicans also voted Democratic out of heart-felt beliefs,
to be sure, as the GOP struggles in what is expected to be a rocky
election year.

In Pennsylvania, Obama's campaign was working hard to get supporters
to switch their registration from independent or Republican to
Democratic. He even ran a radio ad reminding those voters that Monday
was the last day they could register as Democrats to vote in the April
22 primary. Meanwhile, Limbaugh also has said he has "operatives"
registering Republicans as Democrats to vote for Clinton.

Between March 10 and 17, the most recent timeframe available, more
than 14,000 new Democrats registered to vote in Pennsylvania and
29,000 voters switched their registration to the Democratic party, the
Philadelphia Inquirer reports.

Before Pennsylvania goes to the polls, the Cleveland, Ohio-area
elections board will release the results of its investigation. Some
ballots containt possible evidence of voter fraud, which in Ohio is
punishable by up to a year in jail and a $2,500 fine.

"I'm looking for evidence," Sandy McNair, a Democratic member of the
county's elections board tells the Plain Dealer. "I'm not interested
in a witch hunt. But I am interested in holding people accountable,
whether they're Democrat or Republican."

This video is from MSNBC's Verdict, broadcast March 24, 2008.

"I want justice...There's an old poster out West, as I recall, that
said, 'Wanted: Dead or Alive,'"
- G.W. Bush, 9/17/01, UPI

"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care.
It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02

Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.

For the best in liberal/leftist commentary, visit www.zeppscommentaries.com


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
cmdr buzz corey  
View profile  
 More options Mar 25 2008, 7:38 pm
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: cmdr buzz corey <cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:38:52 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Mar 25 2008 7:38 pm
Subject: Re: #Limbaugh may have broken Ohio election laws
On Mar 25, 4:51 pm, 4000 Dead <ze...@finestplanet.com> wrote:

The loonie libs would just luv to get Rush on this, but it ain't gonna
happen.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
G.I.Jesus  
View profile  
 More options Mar 25 2008, 8:54 pm
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: "G.I.Jesus" <gwb...@tenn.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:54:38 -0700
Local: Tues, Mar 25 2008 8:54 pm
Subject: Re: #Limbaugh may have broken Ohio election laws

"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:c497f146-5f35-4119-a460-1cddba129193@m34g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...

> The loonie libs would just luv to get Rush on this, but it ain't gonna
> happen.

Okay, Nostrodamas.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
4000 Dead  
View profile  
 More options Mar 25 2008, 9:55 pm
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: 4000 Dead <zepp22114...@finestplanet.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:55:28 GMT
Local: Tues, Mar 25 2008 9:55 pm
Subject: Re: #Limbaugh may have broken Ohio election laws
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:38:52 -0700 (PDT), cmdr buzz corey

Agreed.  As long as Putsch is in office, right wingers are above the
law.
--

What do you call a Republican with a conscience?

An ex-Republican.

http://www.balloon-juice.com/?p=8827 (From Yang, AthD (h.c)

"Prosperity and peace are in the balance," -- Putsch, not admitting that he's against both

Putsch: leading America to asymetric warfare since 2001      

Not dead, in jail, or a slave?  Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
Zepps_News-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
Zepps_essays-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Foxtrot  
View profile  
 More options Mar 25 2008, 10:21 pm
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: Foxtrot <foxt...@null.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:21:07 -0700
Local: Tues, Mar 25 2008 10:21 pm
Subject: Re: #Limbaugh may have broken Ohio election laws

C'mon asshole make our day. LOL

>>The loonie libs would just luv to get Rush on this, but it ain't gonna
>>happen.

>Agreed.  As long as Putsch is in office, right wingers are above the
>law.

It's an OHIO law that they're investigating dumbass, not federal.
Your paranoid hatred of Bush is showing.

Go right ahead and try to ignore the First Amendment and attack
Rush. And go right ahead and try to prosecute Ohio voters for
voting as they see fit.

You're only driving people away from the Dem party and increasing
Rush's audience.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Steve  
View profile  
 More options Mar 26 2008, 6:17 am
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: Steve <stevencan...@yahooooooo.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 06:17:42 -0400
Local: Wed, Mar 26 2008 6:17 am
Subject: Re: #Limbaugh may have broken Ohio election laws
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:55:28 GMT, 4000 Dead

The desperate loons are claiming that it's illegal to change your
registration....   what a hoot

Milt Shook is too stupid to find out what a Congressional page
does before claiming to have been one....

"I was a Senate Page for two years when I went to HS in Maryland. Why is
that hard to believe?"
--Milt.Shook
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.politics/msg/45a41b2be7278eed?&q=...

"Of course, between commuting an hour each way to and from the Capitol
every day, and trying to keep up with my studies in high school, and
play JV football (I was "too skinny" for varsity, according to my
moronic coach), and a few other extra curricular activities, I
wouldn't have had much time for that, anyway. Especially after I blew
out my knee in the fourth game of the season... damn... "

--Milt Shook, apparently unaware that congressional pages attend school
mornings and evenings at the Capital so they can attend sessions of Congress.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/d4fb757cb48...

"I was a [..Congressional..] page. Twice; and both
under unusual circumstances, especially the second time. "
--Milt Shook
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/f2f538a583c...

Canyon note: Fantasies like that aren't unusual at all for Shook..


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Michael Ejercito  
View profile  
 More options Mar 26 2008, 10:56 am
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 07:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Mar 26 2008 10:56 am
Subject: Re: #Limbaugh may have broken Ohio election laws
On Mar 26, 2:17 am, Steve <stevencan...@yahooooooo.com> wrote:

   What else do they have?

 Michael


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
milt.sh...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Mar 26 2008, 11:14 am
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: milt.sh...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Mar 26 2008 11:14 am
Subject: Re: #Limbaugh may have broken Ohio election laws
On Mar 25, 9:55 pm, 4000 Dead <zepp22114...@finestplanet.com> wrote:

Oh, I don't know about this one. A radio host tells his minions to go
out and break the law, some of them go out and break the law, and it's
the radio host's fault?

Far be it from me to defend Limbaugh, but for Chrissakes, this is
insane. I just don't see how he's responsibility for the stupidity of
the idiots who listen to him and do what he says. Isn't this much like
those mothers who tried to sue Ozzy Osbourne because he supposedly
told their kids to commit suicide? Whatever happened to individual
free will. The schmucks who chose to break the law in Ohio should be
prosecuted, not Limbaugh.

I'd much rather see him thrown in jail for doctor shopping, or other
things he IS responsible for.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
4000 Dead  
View profile  
 More options Mar 26 2008, 11:22 am
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: 4000 Dead <zepp22114...@finestplanet.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:22:20 GMT
Local: Wed, Mar 26 2008 11:22 am
Subject: Re: #Limbaugh may have broken Ohio election laws
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 07:56:15 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito

Changing it for purposes of election fraud may well be illegal.

Especially since some of those right wingers were stupid enough to
write in that that was their intent on the forms.

> Michael

--

What do you call a Republican with a conscience?

An ex-Republican.

http://www.balloon-juice.com/?p=8827 (From Yang, AthD (h.c)

"Prosperity and peace are in the balance," -- Putsch, not admitting that he's against both

Putsch: leading America to asymetric warfare since 2001      

Not dead, in jail, or a slave?  Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
Zepps_News-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
Zepps_essays-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
4000 Dead  
View profile  
 More options Mar 26 2008, 11:29 am
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: 4000 Dead <zepp22114...@finestplanet.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:29:59 GMT
Local: Wed, Mar 26 2008 11:29 am
Subject: Re: #Limbaugh may have broken Ohio election laws

No, but he is complicit.  There IS such a thing as conspiracy charges,
you know.

>Far be it from me to defend Limbaugh, but for Chrissakes, this is
>insane. I just don't see how he's responsibility for the stupidity of
>the idiots who listen to him and do what he says. Isn't this much like
>those mothers who tried to sue Ozzy Osbourne because he supposedly
>told their kids to commit suicide? Whatever happened to individual
>free will. The schmucks who chose to break the law in Ohio should be
>prosecuted, not Limbaugh.

That's been a favorite defence of the GOP for years: "he wuz too
stoop'd to know he was doin' anything wrong."

>I'd much rather see him thrown in jail for doctor shopping, or other
>things he IS responsible for.

--

What do you call a Republican with a conscience?

An ex-Republican.

http://www.balloon-juice.com/?p=8827 (From Yang, AthD (h.c)

"Prosperity and peace are in the balance," -- Putsch, not admitting that he's against both

Putsch: leading America to asymetric warfare since 2001      

Not dead, in jail, or a slave?  Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
Zepps_News-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
Zepps_essays-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
bvallely@aol.com  
View profile  
 More options Mar 26 2008, 11:46 am
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: "bvall...@aol.com" <bvall...@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Mar 26 2008 11:46 am
Subject: Re: #Limbaugh may have broken Ohio election laws
.
> Abrams praises investigation of Limbaugh's Dem primary 'dirty tricks'

.
Good.

Republicans are sick and tired of Democrat "mean" tactics, and are
fighting back in kind.
And now you want to arrest Rush Limbaugh for thought crime
violations?  You want to arrest citizens for casting votes for the
"wrong" reason?

BTW, just how has your heavy handed thug tactics worked so far to
dismantle the Republican Party?

http://www.gallup.com/poll/105691/McCain-vs-Obama-28-Clinton-Backers-...

If McCain vs. Obama, 28% of Clinton Backers Go for McCain
If McCain vs. Clinton, 19% of Obama backers go for McCain


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Steve  
View profile  
 More options Mar 26 2008, 11:46 am
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: Steve <stevencan...@yahooooooo.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:46:49 -0400
Local: Wed, Mar 26 2008 11:46 am
Subject: Re: #Limbaugh may have broken Ohio election laws
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:22:20 GMT, 4000 Dead

Zepp may well be insane....

>Especially since some of those right wingers were stupid enough to
>write in that that was their intent on the forms.

There was no election fraud..  these people truly wanted the candidate
they voted for to be the Democrat Party's nominee...


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Steve  
View profile  
 More options Mar 26 2008, 11:46 am
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: Steve <stevencan...@yahooooooo.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:46:50 -0400
Local: Wed, Mar 26 2008 11:46 am
Subject: Re: #Limbaugh may have broken Ohio election laws
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:29:59 GMT, 4000 Dead

<ROFL>  There IS such a thing as Leftist desperation....  

Milt Shook is too stupid to find out what a Congressional page
does before claiming to have been one....

"I was a Senate Page for two years when I went to HS in Maryland. Why is
that hard to believe?"
--Milt.Shook
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.politics/msg/45a41b2be7278eed?&q=...

"Of course, between commuting an hour each way to and from the Capitol
every day, and trying to keep up with my studies in high school, and
play JV football (I was "too skinny" for varsity, according to my
moronic coach), and a few other extra curricular activities, I
wouldn't have had much time for that, anyway. Especially after I blew
out my knee in the fourth game of the season... damn... "

--Milt Shook, apparently unaware that congressional pages attend school
mornings and evenings at the Capital so they can attend sessions of Congress.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/d4fb757cb48...

"I was a [..Congressional..] page. Twice; and both
under unusual circumstances, especially the second time. "
--Milt Shook
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/f2f538a583c...

Canyon note: Fantasies like that aren't unusual at all for Shook..


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Steve  
View profile  
 More options Mar 26 2008, 11:46 am
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: Steve <stevencan...@yahooooooo.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:46:50 -0400
Local: Wed, Mar 26 2008 11:46 am
Subject: Re: #Limbaugh may have broken Ohio election laws

Except there was no law broken nor was anyone told to break any law...

>Far be it from me to defend Limbaugh, but for Chrissakes, this is
>insane. I just don't see how he's responsibility for the stupidity of
>the idiots who listen to him and do what he says. Isn't this much like
>those mothers who tried to sue Ozzy Osbourne because he supposedly
>told their kids to commit suicide? Whatever happened to individual
>free will. The schmucks who chose to break the law in Ohio should be
>prosecuted, not Limbaugh.

>I'd much rather see him thrown in jail for doctor shopping, or other
>things he IS responsible for.

Milt Shook is too stupid to find out what a Congressional page
does before claiming to have been one....

"I was a Senate Page for two years when I went to HS in Maryland. Why is
that hard to believe?"
--Milt.Shook
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.politics/msg/45a41b2be7278eed?&q=...

"Of course, between commuting an hour each way to and from the Capitol
every day, and trying to keep up with my studies in high school, and
play JV football (I was "too skinny" for varsity, according to my
moronic coach), and a few other extra curricular activities, I
wouldn't have had much time for that, anyway. Especially after I blew
out my knee in the fourth game of the season... damn... "

--Milt Shook, apparently unaware that congressional pages attend school
mornings and evenings at the Capital so they can attend sessions of Congress.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/d4fb757cb48...

"I was a [..Congressional..] page. Twice; and both
under unusual circumstances, especially the second time. "
--Milt Shook
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/f2f538a583c...

Canyon note: Fantasies like that aren't unusual at all for Shook..


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
bvallely@aol.com  
View profile  
(1 user)  More options Mar 26 2008, 11:54 am
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: "bvall...@aol.com" <bvall...@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Mar 26 2008 11:54 am
Subject: Re: #Limbaugh may have broken Ohio election laws
.
> >> The desperate loons are claiming that it's illegal to change your
> >> registration....   what a hoot
> >   What else do they have?
.
> Changing it for purposes of election fraud may well be illegal.

.
Elected officials can decide what's going on inside the heads of
voters?
.
> Especially since some of those right wingers were stupid enough to
> write in that that was their intent on the forms.

.
OK, so you're lying again.  Standard Jamie procedure. What actually
happened is that in 99.9 percent of the cases, the loyalty oaths
weren't even asked for.   You guys got nuthin'!!!!!!

After years of trying to destroy Rush's life, he's just kicked the
Democrat Party in the balls.

Wasn't it only a few months ago that the lefties were gloating how
"irrelevant" Rush had become?  That he was now a "has been"?

Tell me, how has your plan to "turn mean" been working out for you?


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Steve  
View profile  
(1 user)  More options Mar 26 2008, 12:05 pm
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: Steve <stevencan...@yahooooooo.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:05:43 -0400
Local: Wed, Mar 26 2008 12:05 pm
Subject: Re: #Limbaugh may have broken Ohio election laws
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:54:16 -0700 (PDT), "bvall...@aol.com"

Fatty's been calling his enemies "cunts" lately..   That's sure to
bring people around to his POV...

I figure it's time to start considering legal action
against this little stalker.  
Zepp Jamieson 2 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.democrats.d/msg/b503459d6...


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
bvallely@aol.com  
View profile  
(1 user)  More options Mar 26 2008, 12:12 pm
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: "bvall...@aol.com" <bvall...@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Mar 26 2008 12:12 pm
Subject: Re: #Limbaugh may have broken Ohio election laws

> Far be it from me to defend Limbaugh, but for Chrissakes, this is
> insane. I just don't see how he's responsibility for the stupidity of
> the idiots who listen to him and do what he says. Isn't this much like
> those mothers who tried to sue Ozzy Osbourne because he supposedly
> told their kids to commit suicide? Whatever happened to individual
> free will. The schmucks who chose to break the law in Ohio should be
> prosecuted, not Limbaugh.

.
The problem is that the Ohio law is insanely unconstitutional.  Ohio
is the only state in the Union which demands a loyalty oath, and if
challenged, it wouldn't stand for ten seconds.   Talk show host and
constitutional scholar Hugh Hewitt has already collected a team of the
top constitutional lawyers in the country to stand by Rush if Ohio is
stupid enough press forward.

I must admit, it would be tons o' fun to see Democrats defending the
concepts of thought crimes and loyalty oaths (not loyalty oaths to
America - oh goddess, no - that would be as insane as wearing an
American flag on one's lapel or walking out on a Minister while he
screams "God DAMN America" - but loyalty to the Democrat Party.) Oh,
here's another turd in the punchbowl in regards to your dream of
shutting down free speech - in almost every case, nobody bothered to
ask for the Loyalty Oath To The Democrat Party be signed.

> I'd much rather see him thrown in jail for doctor shopping, or other
> things he IS responsible for.

.
Please list ANYBODY who's EVER been arrested in Florida for a first
offense doctor shopping pain killers after an operation after
volunteering entering rehab.  Here's a quick clue - it's never
happened.  Rush's enemies have been looking for years, and have come
up empty handed.  But then, what is the law for, if not to be twisted
around to arrest people who criticize Democrats?

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
bvallely@aol.com  
View profile  
(1 user)  More options Mar 26 2008, 12:17 pm
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: "bvall...@aol.com" <bvall...@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:17:31 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Mar 26 2008 12:17 pm
Subject: Re: #Limbaugh may have broken Ohio election laws
.
> >Oh, I don't know about this one. A radio host tells his minions to go
> >out and break the law, some of them go out and break the law, and it's
> >the radio host's fault?
.
> No, but he is complicit.  There IS such a thing as conspiracy charges,
> you know.

.
Ooooooooo, so Rush is guilty of conspiracy to violate Ohio's Thought
Control Law.  After all, the Democrats want to control the MOTIVES of
voters, and to make votes they don't like criminal.

.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
bvall...@aol.com  
View profile  
(1 user)  More options Mar 26 2008, 12:22 pm
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: bvall...@aol.com
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Mar 26 2008 12:22 pm
Subject: Re: #Limbaugh may have broken Ohio election laws

> >OK, so you're lying again.  Standard Jamie procedure. What actually
> >happened is that in 99.9 percent of the cases, the loyalty oaths
> >weren't even asked for.   You guys got nuthin'!!!!!!
.
> >After years of trying to destroy Rush's life, he's just kicked the
> >Democrat Party in the balls.
.
> >Wasn't it only a few months ago that the lefties were gloating how
> >"irrelevant" Rush had become?  That he was now a "has been"?
.
> >Tell me, how has your plan to "turn mean" been working out for you?
.
> Fatty's been calling his enemies "cunts" lately..   That's sure to
> bring people around to his POV...

.
I understand that when Jamie wants to masturbate, he has to roll
around in flour to find the wet spot.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
milt.sh...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Mar 26 2008, 12:44 pm
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: milt.sh...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:44:59 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Mar 26 2008 12:44 pm
Subject: Re: #Limbaugh may have broken Ohio election laws
On Mar 26, 11:29 am, 4000 Dead <zepp22114...@finestplanet.com> wrote:

This crime involves one person. Basically, a person showed up at the
polling place, that person voted when he shouldn't have, and did so of
his own volition. This isn't a conspiracy; it's stupidity.

One question, though; how can you have a conspiracy when the two
people supposedly involved have never had contact with each other.

> >Far be it from me to defend Limbaugh, but for Chrissakes, this is
> >insane. I just don't see how he's responsibility for the stupidity of
> >the idiots who listen to him and do what he says. Isn't this much like
> >those mothers who tried to sue Ozzy Osbourne because he supposedly
> >told their kids to commit suicide? Whatever happened to individual
> >free will. The schmucks who chose to break the law in Ohio should be
> >prosecuted, not Limbaugh.

> That's been a favorite defence of the GOP for years: "he wuz too
> stoop'd to know he was doin' anything wrong."

Well, in this case, they're right. How far do we take this? If Thom
Hartmann tells his listeners to join a protest, and they end up
arrested, should we also go after Thom, because he told them to do
it?


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
4000 Dead  
View profile  
 More options Mar 26 2008, 1:13 pm
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: 4000 Dead <ze...@finestplanet.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:13:30 GMT
Local: Wed, Mar 26 2008 1:13 pm
Subject: Re: #Limbaugh may have broken Ohio election laws

Same way a hired gun for the mob who has never spoken to the head of
the family can stil be part of the same conspiracy.  It is enough that
the mob boss makes his wishes known.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
milt.sh...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Mar 26 2008, 3:21 pm
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: milt.sh...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:21:40 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Mar 26 2008 3:21 pm
Subject: Re: #Limbaugh may have broken Ohio election laws
On Mar 26, 1:13 pm, 4000 Dead <ze...@finestplanet.com> wrote:

Okay, besides the fact that we're not talking about murder here, or
robbery, I would also point out that the instances of actually
prosecuting a mob boss are very rare. It's because it requires there
be some sort of direct access and coercion for there to be a
conspiracy. If you complain to me that you're low on money, and I tell
you jokingly to "rob a bank," I'm not part of the conspiracy if you
decide to do so. It takes a little more than simply asking someone to
do something to create a conspiracy. What sort of coercion do you
think Limbaugh used?


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
milt.sh...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Mar 26 2008, 3:32 pm
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: milt.sh...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Mar 26 2008 3:32 pm
Subject: Re: #Limbaugh may have broken Ohio election laws
On Mar 26, 12:12 pm, "bvall...@aol.com" <bvall...@aol.com> wrote:

> > Far be it from me to defend Limbaugh, but for Chrissakes, this is
> > insane. I just don't see how he's responsibility for the stupidity of
> > the idiots who listen to him and do what he says. Isn't this much like
> > those mothers who tried to sue Ozzy Osbourne because he supposedly
> > told their kids to commit suicide? Whatever happened to individual
> > free will. The schmucks who chose to break the law in Ohio should be
> > prosecuted, not Limbaugh.

> .
> The problem is that the Ohio law is insanely unconstitutional.  Ohio
> is the only state in the Union which demands a loyalty oath, and if
> challenged, it wouldn't stand for ten seconds.   Talk show host and
> constitutional scholar Hugh Hewitt has already collected a team of the
> top constitutional lawyers in the country to stand by Rush if Ohio is
> stupid enough press forward.

They really can't be that stupid. At least I hope not. I can't stand
Limbaugh, but he has the same freedom of speech as everyone else. How
chilling would it be to free speech if, every time you said something
controversial, you had to worry about some moron taking you too
literally and breaking the law, based on what you said?

If someone who voted actually broke a valid law, that person should be
prosecuted, if appropriate. But when some lamebrain hears Limbaugh say
something, and does exactly that, it's not Limbaugh's fault. Limbaugh
can't help that he attracts an audience of morons... well, it is, but
he can't be held responsible for their moronic activities.

> I must admit, it would be tons o' fun to see Democrats defending the
> concepts of thought crimes and loyalty oaths (not loyalty oaths to
> America - oh goddess, no - that would be as insane as wearing an
> American flag on one's lapel or walking out on a Minister while he
> screams "God DAMN America" - but loyalty to the Democrat Party.) Oh,
> here's another turd in the punchbowl in regards to your dream of
> shutting down free speech - in almost every case, nobody bothered to
> ask for the Loyalty Oath To The Democrat Party be signed.

Well, I'm actually kind of surprised to see Democrats going down this
road. This is a clear free speech issue. I can't stand Limbaugh, but I
also defend his right to free speech unequivocally. And blaming him
because someone did something stupid on his say-so is simply
ridiculous. If Randi Rhodes told her listeners to climb the White
House fence, and several of them did it, you can say she's stupid for
telling them that, and you might make a case for civil responsibility,
if Secret Sevice killed them while doing so. But would she be a
criminal? Of course not.

> > I'd much rather see him thrown in jail for doctor shopping, or other
> > things he IS responsible for.

> .
> Please list ANYBODY who's EVER been arrested in Florida for a first
> offense doctor shopping pain killers after an operation after
> volunteering entering rehab.  Here's a quick clue - it's never
> happened.  Rush's enemies have been looking for years, and have come
> up empty handed.  But then, what is the law for, if not to be twisted
> around to arrest people who criticize Democrats?

As usual, you missed my point. I was talking about his responsibility
for actions. Immediately, you go into defensive mode...

But I will say this... doctor shopping is the rich person's equivalent
of forging prescriptions, or breaking into a pharmacy and stealing
meds. it just goes to show that there is a chasm between justice for
the rich and justice for the poor...


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jeffrey Scott Linder  
View profile  
 More options Mar 26 2008, 4:51 pm
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: linder....@osu.edu (Jeffrey Scott Linder)
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 20:51:04 GMT
Local: Wed, Mar 26 2008 4:51 pm
Subject: Re: #Limbaugh may have broken Ohio election laws

And you were so willing to forgive Michael Moore in 2004.
Well...it is the silly season.

JSL


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jeffrey Scott Linder  
View profile  
 More options Mar 26 2008, 4:54 pm
Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: linder....@osu.edu (Jeffrey Scott Linder)
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 20:54:21 GMT
Local: Wed, Mar 26 2008 4:54 pm
Subject: Re: #Limbaugh may have broken Ohio election laws

I keep waiting for Zepp to use his Michael Moore defense on this
one....doens't seem to be happening.

JSL


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Messages 1 - 25 of 63   Newer >
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google