ral...@yahoo.com (R.A. Lewis) wrote in message news:<f1bc6d69.04012...@posting.google.com>...
>The "big 3" auto makers and the transportation indexes are poised to
>crumble and will drag the rest of the markets, and the overall world
>economy, down into the depression which I have described in my earlier
>post.
Odd you're smarter about this than all those brilliant and experienced
insiders on Wall Street, who actually talk to GM executives, who
actually know the implications for profits of all these factors.
Why don't they share your insights and sell GM down to the point of a
fair price? Why are they letting all those easy profits go to someone
else?.
> Higher fuel prices will be a major factor, probably THE major
>factor, but higher interest rates could certainly reduce the amount of
>profits/sales made by the auto makers. Also, the underemployment
>situation which I wrote of (and the fear of underemployment) will not
>inspire consumers to make big ticket purchases with long-term loans
>(to say nothing of leases). And again, fuel costs factor in here
>because people will not want to buy the gas-guzzlers which make the
>biggest profits for the auto industry.
> Do not underestimate the central role which the auto industry
>plays in the American/world economy or it's connection with the
>petroleum industry (which plays an even more central role). The
>downward spiral for these industries has already begun and the
>negative feedback loop will not stop till it reaches the bottom of the
>economic pit.
The evidence from past stock movements suggests that basically no one
is reliable in predictions such as yours.
Fortune telling is not a widely respected profession.
George Leroy Tyrebiter Jr. <gl...@cmhs.edu> wrote in message news:<e40p1099mj0f1u2qj...@4ax.com>...
> Odd you're smarter about this than all those brilliant and experienced
> insiders on Wall Street, who actually talk to GM executives, who
> actually know the implications for profits of all these factors.
>
> Why don't they share your insights and sell GM down to the point of a
> fair price? Why are they letting all those easy profits go to someone
> else?.
>
> Fortune telling is not a widely respected profession.
>
Once again I'll mention Jack Grubman and I'll also point to tulips and
the dotcom bubble.
George Leroy Tyrebiter Jr. <gl...@cmhs.edu> wrote in message news:<e40p1099mj0f1u2qj...@4ax.com>...
> Odd you're smarter about this than all those brilliant and experienced
> insiders on Wall Street, who actually talk to GM executives, who
> actually know the implications for profits of all these factors.
>
> Why don't they share your insights and sell GM down to the point of a
> fair price? Why are they letting all those easy profits go to someone
> else?.
>
> Fortune telling is not a widely respected profession.
>
Once again I'll mention Jack Grubman and I'll also point to tulips and
the dotcom bubble.
> >
> >
George Leroy Tyrebiter Jr. <gl...@cmhs.edu> wrote in message news:<e40p1099mj0f1u2qj...@4ax.com>...
> Odd you're smarter about this than all those brilliant and experienced
> insiders on Wall Street, who actually talk to GM executives, who
> actually know the implications for profits of all these factors.
>
> Why don't they share your insights and sell GM down to the point of a
> fair price? Why are they letting all those easy profits go to someone
> else?.
>
> Fortune telling is not a widely respected profession.
>
Once again I'll mention Jack Grubman and I'll also point to tulips and
the dotcom bubble.
> >
> >
George Leroy Tyrebiter Jr. <gl...@cmhs.edu> wrote in message news:<e40p1099mj0f1u2qj...@4ax.com>...
> Odd you're smarter about this than all those brilliant and experienced
> insiders on Wall Street, who actually talk to GM executives, who
> actually know the implications for profits of all these factors.
>
> Why don't they share your insights and sell GM down to the point of a
> fair price? Why are they letting all those easy profits go to someone
> else?.
>
> Fortune telling is not a widely respected profession.
>
Once again I'll mention Jack Grubman and I'll also point to tulips and
the dotcom bubble.
> >
> >
ral...@yahoo.com (R.A. Lewis) wrote in message news:<f1bc6d69.04013...@posting.google.com>...
What would Kerry do to "keep the economy going", other than to raise the tax
burden on the American Worker? Does Kerry not have ANY plans of his own?
You make Kerry sound like such an incompetant, mindless, directionless oaf!
>What would Kerry do to "keep the economy going"...
Replacing Bad News Bush would be enough.
Actually, he's just another corrupt politician.
Imagine that.