Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Sarah Palin Movie?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

palin@tsniffsniff.net J. Norman Gype

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 2:59:37 PM11/22/09
to
This is hilarious!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiWgXUuWX-s&feature=player_embedded

The majority of sane American voters will vote for a Democrat any day over a
stupid blow up doll.

And the Paliens want us to forget it too. They want to ignore, justify or
forget her legacy so far.

This would happen if She was elected--- Remember that she said it was
written in the Bible that Bush was to invade Iraq,
I am sure if she was elected she would say it is written that Sarah
Palin is the chosen one to start World Nuclear War.
That was the #1 reason I was against McCain.

I would also say if McCain had won McCain would have Died quickly and
this would have happened already
The Election of Obama has saved the World from being ended.

Message has been deleted

palin@tsniffsniff.net J. Norman Gype

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 9:06:10 PM11/22/09
to

"Neolibertarian" <cogn...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2a2fe$4b09e6f5$18f55223$13...@allthenewsgroups.com...
> In article <hec56o$aom$1...@news.albasani.net>,

> "J. Norman Gype" <pinko pa...@tsniffsniff.net> wrote:
>
>> This is hilarious!
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiWgXUuWX-s&feature=player_embedded
>>
>> The majority of sane American voters will vote for a Democrat any day
>> over a
>> stupid blow up doll.
>>
>> And the Paliens want us to forget it too. They want to ignore, justify or
>> forget her legacy so far.
>>
>> This would happen if She was elected--- Remember that she said it was
>> written in the Bible that Bush was to invade Iraq,
>
>
> Wellya, but then Barack Obama

Bu... bu... bu... Obama..............


bvallely

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 11:41:28 PM11/22/09
to
On Nov 22, 1:33 pm, Mr.B1ack <b...@barrk.net> wrote:
> "J. Norman Gype" <pinko pa...@tsniffsniff.net> wrote:
>
>
>
.
>    If there's to be any movie about Palin, it had
>    better be anime ... because she's already become
>    a cartoon figure - with plenty of help from the
>    media (hostile and non-hostile), the GOP, her
>    ardent supporters and Palin herself.
.
When the Democrats took over both Houses in 2006, unemployment was
4.6% (today it's 10.2%). In 2007, the last budget submitted by the
Republican Congress and signed by Bush, the deficit was 187 billion.
Last year, it was over 200 billion, FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER.

I understand why you want to make crude "jokes" about Sarah Palin.
ANYTHING to keep from thinking how badly the Democrats have screwed up
this country.

Message has been deleted

liberal

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 2:36:00 PM11/24/09
to
On Nov 23, 5:11 pm, Mr.B1ack <b...@barrk.net> wrote:
>    The USA has been running a false economy, a vast ponzi
>    scheme even Bernie Madoff would bow down and worship,
>    for decades ... into the Nixon, maybe LBJ years. The
>    problem has been debt - national, trade, institutional,
>    personal. Employment rates, standards of living ... all
>    false indicators - financed, ultimately, with money we
>    didn't earn. For politicians, their whole plan seemed
>    to be to keep the bread and circuses coming at ANY cost,
>    at least until THEY were safely out of office.

Yes. The difference between thee and me are the lessons we draw and
the steps we see as the way to rebuilding our economy.

In one sense China is in worse condition than the US. We depend on
them to manufacture our underwear; they depend on us to buy our
underwear from them.

China's population is so large there aren't enough natural resources
available for them to move their population all into the 21st century.
Some of the problems the US is experiencing is that *OUR* population
has exceeded our resources as well, but we're not several magnitudes
beyond our internal capacities. We just find it cheaper to buy from
the world market.


>
>    Sure, the unemployment rate was low in 2006 ... but
>    those workers were being paid with borrowed or
>    expected money, red ink, not real profits. The net
>    national bank balance kept going *down* despite what
>    work they did. This couldn't go on forever, and didn't.
>
>    Alas, OB is busy arranging for more bread and
>    circuses ... again paid for with even MORE
>    borrowed money.

Evidence? A claim, but no proof.

> Might make him popular, but
>    it's unlikely to solve the problem - and just
>    sets us up for an even bigger fall a few years
>    down the road.


>
> >I understand why you want to make crude "jokes" about Sarah Palin.
> >ANYTHING to keep from thinking how badly the Democrats have screwed up
> >this country.
>

>    You misunderstand ... I really don't have much against
>    Palin. Not "presidential material", but hardly evil or
>    deserving of so much bad press.

Wrong. Palin as housewife, a Hallmark Card store owner, a elderly
daycare worker, etc. are tasks she could handle and do a respectable
job of. But running the US executive branch is so far beyond her
intellectual abilities that to aspire to do so is absolutely evil.

bvallely

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 6:57:18 PM11/24/09
to
.
> Yes. The difference between thee and me are the lessons we draw and
> the steps we see as the way to rebuilding our economy.
.
The left doesn't learn anything. You are about shouting down dissent,
not learning from you mistakes.

For instance, what did you learn after decades of government
regulating banks to for that institutions to transfer 42% of their
portfolios to risky, sub-prime loans, the economy collapsed? Nothing
- the Democrats are comping at the bit to continue that practice.

0 new messages