Re: Stormfront, over 100k visitors a day.
mose
<wis...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:hcnif5heuammllots...@4ax.com...
> http://www.stormfront.org/
>
> Marvelous forum, vital information for
> American citizens.
>
> ted
WELL APPARENTLY THERE IS NO ONE TO TURN TO IF YOU DONT LIKE JEWISH
DOMINATION OF WHAT IS GOING ON IN THE WORLD AND ISRAEL IN OUR NAME AND WITH
OUR MONEY.
AND I CANNOT THINK OF A BETTER WAY TO ENCOURAGE STORMFRONT THAN BY PUSHING
PEOPLE INTO THEIR RANKS BY IGNORING THEM.
QUITE OPENLY WE HAVE LOST CONTROL OF OUR MEDIA. AND IF MEDIA OWNERS BELONG
TO A PARTICULAR GROUP OR RELIGION THEY CAN CONTROL WHAT THEIR PAPERS LET
OUT.
Jewish officials in a major Italian news agency tried to cover the story
up, but were circumvented by Italian news reporters, who broadcast scenes
from the films live at prime time on Italian television to more than 11
million Italian viewers. Jewish officials then fired the executives
responsible, claiming they were spreading "blood libel."
IN ITALY ADOZEN REPORTERS AND EXECUTIVE SACKED, THE GOVERNMENT WOULD BE ABLE
TO DO NOTHING AS AMERICA CANNOT.
Rome, Italy -- Italian and Russian police, working together, broke up a
ring of Jewish gangsters who had been involved in the manufacture of child
rape and snuff pornography.
http://www.ety.com/HRP/jewishstudies/snuffporn.htm
Three Russian Jews and eight Italian Jews were arrested after police
discovered they had been kidnapping non-Jewish children between the ages
of two and five years from Russian orphanages, raping the children, and
then murdering them on film. Mostly non-Jewish customers, including 1,700
nationwide, 600 in Italy, and an unknown number in the United States, paid
as much as $20,000 per film to watch little children being raped and
murdered.
Jewish officials in a major Italian news agency tried to cover the story
up, but were circumvented by Italian news reporters, who broadcast scenes
from the films live at prime time on Italian television to more than 11
million Italian viewers. Jewish officials then fired the executives
responsible, claiming they were spreading "blood libel."
Throughout history, various groups have accused sects of Jews of ritually
murdering small children. One such account, that of Hugh of Lincoln, led
to the expulsion of all Jews from Britain in the 13th Century. Such
accounts have generally been discounted, but are so widespread that Jewish
organizations have developed a name for them -- "blood libel."
Though AP and Reuters both ran stories on the episode, US media
conglomerates refused to carry the story on television news, again saying
the story would prejudice Americans against Jews.
Jewish gangsters in Russia have become increasingly linked to traffic in
"white slaves" and prostitutes through Israel, according to a recent
report in the Jerusalem Post. Israel turns an official blind eye to forced
prostitution, and does not punish Israeli citizens who choose to own "sex
slaves" as long as the slaves are foreign and non-Jews.
Yeah well don't blame police, DEFENCE PERSONNEL,CIVILIAN AUTHORITIES , they
are just doing their job WHICH YOU EMPLOY THEM TO DO..
ABOUT TIME YOU SORTED THE SHEEP FROM THE GOATS AND USED YOUR VOTE.
U NO WHAT U R SO DONT VOTE AGAINST YOURSELF. VOTE FOR YOUR BEST INTERESTS
AND TO DO THAT
U HAVE TO NO WHAT U R..AND WHAT THE PERSON U R VOTING FOR IS andwhat he
believes in.
HIS RELIGION MIGHT HEAVILY INFLUENCE HIS DECISIONS.
.LETS NOT BE AS TRUSTING ASWE HAVE BEEN IN THE PAST.
"Love Europe, Hate the EU" <eu...@yahoo.co.uk wrote in message
news:8adbfa74-6fa0-4b60...@z41g2000yqz.googlegroups.com...
Immigration: The Full Story of the Immigrants Who Opened the
Floodgates
The Culture of Critique reviewed by Stanley Hornbeck
In The Culture of Critique, Evolutionary Psychologist Professor Kevin
MacDonald advances a carefully researched but extremely controversial
thesis: that certain 20th century intellectual movements - largely
established and led by Jews - have changed European societies in
fundamental ways and destroyed the confidence of Western man. He
claims that these movements were designed, consciously or
unconsciously, to advance Jewish interests even though they were
presented to non-Jews as universalistic and even utopian. He concludes
that the increasing dominance of these ideas has had profound
political and social consequences that benefited Jews but caused great
harm to gentile societies. This analysis, which he makes with
considerable force, is an unusual indictment of a people generally
thought to be more sinned against than sinning.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Culture_of_Critique_series
http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/books.htm
http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/PrefacePPB.pdf
The Culture of Critique is the final title in Prof. MacDonald's
massive, three-volume study of Jews and their role in history. The two
previous volumes are A People That Shall Dwell Alone and Separation
and its Discontents, published by Praeger in 1994 and 1998. The series
is written from a sociobiological perspective that views Judaism as a
unique survival strategy that helps Jews compete with other ethnic
groups. Prof. MacDonald, who is a psychologist at the University of
California at Long Beach, explains this perspective in the first
volume, which describes Jews as having a very powerful sense of
uniqueness that has kept them socially and genetically separate from
other peoples. The second volume traces the history of Jewish-gentile
relations, and finds the causes of anti-Semitism primarily in the
almost invariable commercial and intellectual dominance of gentile
societies by Jews and in their refusal to assimilate. The Culture of
Critique brings his analysis into the present century, with an account
of the Jewish role in the radical critique of traditional culture.
The intellectual movements Prof. MacDonald discusses in this volume
are Marxism, Freudian psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt school of
sociology, and Boasian anthropology. Perhaps most relevant from a
racial perspective, he also traces the role of Jews in promoting multi-
culturalism and Third World immigration. Throughout his analysis Prof.
MacDonald reiterates his view that Jews have promoted these movements
as Jews and in the interests of Jews, though they have often tried to
give the impression that they had no distinctive interests of their
own. Therefore Prof. MacDonald's most profound charge against Jews is
not ethnocentrism but dishonesty - that while claiming to be working
for the good of mankind they have often worked for their own good and
to the detriment of others. While attempting to promote the
brotherhood of man by dissolving the ethnic identification of
gentiles, Jews have maintained precisely the kind of intense group
solidarity they decry as immoral in others.
Celebrating Diversity
Prof. MacDonald claims that one of the most consistent ways in which
Jews have advanced their interests has been to promote pluralism and
diversity - but only for others. Ever since the 19th century, they
have led movements that tried to discredit the traditional foundations
of gentile society: patriotism, racial loyalty, the Christian basis
for morality, social homogeneity, and sexual restraint. At the same
time, within their own communities, and with regard to the state of
Israel, they have often supported the very institutions they attack in
gentile society.
Why is this in the interests of Jews? Because the parochial group
loyalty characteristic of Jews attracts far less attention in a
society that does not have a cohesive racial and cultural core. The
Jewish determination not to assimilate fully, which accounts for their
survival as a people for thousands for years - even without a country
- has invariably attracted unpleasant and even murderous scrutiny in
nations with well -defined national identities. In Prof. MacDonald's
view it is therefore in the interest of Jews to dilute and weaken the
identity of any people among whom they live. Jewish identity can
flower in safety only when gentile identity is weak.
Prof. MacDonald quotes a remarkable passage from Charles Silberman:
"American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their
belief - one firmly rooted in history - that Jews are safe only in a
society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well
as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for
example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming
majority of American Jews to endorse 'gay rights' and to take a
liberal stance on most other so-called 'social' issues."
He is saying, in effect, that when Jews make the diversity-is-our-
strength argument it is in support of their real goal of diluting a
society's homogeneity so that Jews will feel safe. They are couching a
Jewish agenda in terms they think gentiles will accept. Likewise, as
the second part of the Silberman quotation suggests, Jews may support
deviant movements, not because they think it is good for the country
but because it is good for the Jews.
Prof. Silberman also provides an illuminating quote from a Jewish
economist who thought that republicans had more sensible economic
policies but who voted for the Democratic presidential candidate
anyway. His reason? "I'd rather live in a country governed by the
faces I saw at the Democratic convention than those I saw at the
Republican convention." This man apparently distrusts white gentiles
and voted for a racially mixed party even if its economic policies
were wrong. What is good for Jews appears to come before what is good
for the country.
Earl Raab, former president of heavily Jewish Brandeis University
makes the diversity argument in a slightly different way. Expressing
his satisfaction with the prediction that by the middle of the next
century whites will become a minority, he writes, "We have tipped
beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in
this country." He is apparently prepared to displace the people and
culture of the founding stock in order to prevent the theoretical rise
of an anti-Jewish regime. Prof. Raab appears to see whites mainly as
potential Nazis, and is willing to sacrifice their culture and
national continuity in order to defuse an imagined threat to Jews.
This passage takes for granted the continued future existence of Jews
as a distinct community even as gentile whites decline in numbers and
influence.
In the same passage, Prof. Raab continues by noting that, "We [Jews]
have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for
about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the
heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it
irreversible..." - just as it tends to make the ultimate displacement
of European culture also irreversible.
Prof. MacDonald traces the development of this diversity strategy to
several sources. It is widely recognized that the German-Jewish
immigrant Franz Boas (1858-1942) almost single-handedly established
the current contours of anthropology, ridding it of all biological
explanations for differences in human culture or behavior. Prof.
MacDonald reports that he and his followers - with the notable
exceptions of Margaret Mead and Ruth Benedict - were all Jews with
strong Jewish identities: "Jewish identification and the pursuit of
perceived Jewish interests, particularly in advocating an ideology of
cultural pluralism as a model for Western societies, has been the
'invisible subject' of American anthropology."
By 1915, Boas and his students controlled the American Anthropological
Association and by 1926 they headed every major American university
anthropology department. From this position of dominance they promoted
the idea that race and biology are trivial matters, and that
environment counts for everything. They completely recast anthropology
so as to provide intellectual support for open immigration,
integration, and miscegenation. They also laid the foundation for the
idea that because all races have the same potential, the failures of
non-whites must be blamed exclusively on white oppression. The
ultimate conclusion of Boasian anthropology was that since environment
accounts for all human differences, every inequality in achievement
can be eliminated by changing the environment. This has been the
justification for enormous and wasteful government intervention
programs.
The entire "civil rights" movement can be seen as a natural
consequence of the triumph of Boasian thinking. Since all races were
equivalent, separation was immoral. The color line also sharpened
white self-consciousness in ways that might make whites more aware of
Jewish parochialism. Thus it was, according to Prof. MacDonald, that
Jews almost single-handedly launched the desegregation movement.
Without the leadership of Jews, the NAACP might never have been
established, and until 1975 every one of its presidents was a Jew.
Prof. MacDonald reports that in 1917, when the black separatist Marcus
Garvey visited NAACP headquarters, he saw so many white faces that he
stormed out, complaining that it was a white organization.
Prof. MacDonald concludes that the efforts of Jews were crucial to the
"civil rights" transformation of America. He quotes a lawyer for the
American Jewish Congress who claims that "many of these [civil rights]
laws were actually written in the offices of Jewish agencies by Jewish
staff people, introduced by Jewish legislators and pressured into
being by Jewish voters."
While the Boas school was promoting integration and racial
equivalence, it was also critical of, in Prof. MacDonald's words,
"American culture as overly homogeneous, hypocritical, emotionally and
aesthetically repressive (especially with regard to sexuality).
Central to this program was creating ethnographies of idyllic [Third-
World] cultures that were free of the negatively perceived traits that
were attributed to Western culture."
The role of the anthropologist became one of criticizing everything
about Western society while glorifying everything primitive. Prof.
MacDonald notes that Boasian portrayals of non-Western peoples
deliberately ignored barbarism and cruelty or simply attributed it to
contamination from the West. He sees this as a deliberate attempt to
undermine the confidence of Western societies and to make them
permeable to Third World influences and people. Today, this view is
enshrined in the dogma that America must remain open to immigration
because immigrants bring spirit and energy that natives somehow lack.
Authoritarian Personalities
In order to open European-derived societies to the immigration that
would transform them, it was necessary to discredit racial solidarity
and commitment to tradition. Prof. MacDonald argues that this was the
basic purpose of a group of intellectuals known as the Frankfurt
School. What is properly known as the Institute of Social Research was
founded in Frankfurt, Germany, during the Weimar period by a Jewish
millionaire but was closed down by the Nazis shortly after they took
power. Most of its staff emigrated to the United States and the
institute reconstituted itself at UC Berkeley. The organization was
headed by Max Horkheimer, and its most influential members were T.W.
Adorno, Erich Fromm, and Herbert Marcuse, all of whom had strong
Jewish identities. Horkheimer made no secret of the partisan nature of
the institute's activities: "Research would be able here to transform
itself directly into propaganda," he wrote. (Italics in the original.)
Prof. MacDonald devotes many pages to an analysis of The Authoritarian
Personality, which was written by Adorno and appeared in 1950. It was
part of a series called Studies in Prejudice, produced by the
Frankfurt school, which included titles like Anti-Semitism and
Emotional Disorder. The Authoritarian Personality was particularly
influential because, according to Prof. MacDonald, the American Jewish
Committee heavily funded its promotion and because Jewish academics
took up its message so enthusiastically.
The book's purpose is to make every group affiliation sound as if it
were a sign of mental disorder. Everything from patriotism to religion
to family - and race - loyalty are signs of a dangerous and defective
"authoritarian personality." Because drawing distinctions between
different groups is illegitimate, all group loyalties - even close
family ties! - are "prejudice." As Christopher Lasch has written, the
book leads to the conclusion that prejudice "could be eradicated only
by subjecting the American people to what amounted to collective
psychotherapy - by treating them as inmates of an insane asylum."
But according to Prof. MacDonald it is precisely the kind of group
loyalty, respect for tradition, and consciousness of differences
central to Jewish identity that Horkheimer and Adorno described as
mental illness in gentiles. These writers adopted what eventually
became a favorite Soviet tactic against dissidents: Anyone whose
political views were different from theirs was insane. As Prof.
MacDonald explains, the Frankfurt school never criticized or even
described Jewish group identity - only that of gentiles: "behavior
that is critical to Judaism as a successful group evolutionary
strategy is conceptualized as pathological in gentiles."
For these Jewish intellectuals, anti-Semitism was also a sign of
mental illness: They concluded that Christian self-denial and
especially sexual repression caused hatred of Jews. The Frankfurt
school was enthusiastic about psycho-analysis, according to which
"Oedipal ambivalence toward the father and anal-sadistic relations in
early childhood are the anti-Semite's irrevocable inheritance."
In addition to ridiculing patriotism and racial identity, the
Frankfurt school glorified promiscuity and Bohemian poverty. Prof.
MacDonald sees the school as a seminal influence: "Certainly many of
the central attitudes of the largely successful 1960s countercultural
revolution find expression in The Authoritarian Personality, including
idealizing rebellion against parents, low-investment sexual
relationships, and scorn for upward social mobility, social status,
family pride, the Christian religion, and patriotism."
Of the interest here, however, is the movement's success in branding
ancient loyalties to nation and race as mental illnesses. Although he
came later, the French-Jewish "deconstructionist" Jacques Derrida was
in the same tradition when he wrote:
"The idea behind deconstruction is to deconstruct the workings of
strong nation-states with powerful immigration policies, to
deconstruct the rhetoric of nationalism, the politics of place, the
metaphysics of native land and native tongue... The idea is to disarm
the bombs... of identity that nation-states build to defend themselves
against the stranger, against Jews and Arabs and immigrants..."
As Prof. MacDonald puts it, "Viewed at its most abstract level, a
fundamental agenda is thus to influence the European-derived peoples
of the United States to view concern about their own demographic and
cultural eclipse as irrational and as an indication of
psychopathology." Needless to say, this project has been successful;
anyone opposed to the displacement of whites is routinely treated as a
mentally unhinged "hate-monger," and whenever whites defend their
group interests they are described as psychologically inadequate. The
irony has not escaped Prof. MacDonald: "The ideology that
ethnocentrism was a form of psychopathology was promulgated by a group
that over its long history had arguably been the most ethnocentric
group among all the cultures of the world."
Immigration
Prof. MacDonald argues that it is entirely natural for Jews to promote
open immigration. It brings about the "diversity" Jews find comforting
and it keeps America open to persecuted co-religionists throughout the
world. He says Jews are the only group that has always fought for mass
immigration; a few European ethnic organizations have made sporadic
efforts to make it easier for their own people to come, but only Jews
have consistently promoted open borders for all comers. Moreover,
whatever disagreements they may have had on other issues, Jews of
every political persuasion have favored high immigration.
This, too, goes back many years, and Prof. MacDonald traces in
considerable detail the sustained Jewish pro-immigration effort.
Israel Zangwill, author of the eponymous 1908 play The Melting Pot,
was of the view that "there is only one way to World Peace, and that
is the absolute abolition of passports, visas, frontiers, custom
houses..." He was nevertheless an ardent Zionist and disapproved of
Jewish intermarriage.
Although the statue of liberty, properly known as Liberty Enlightening
the World, was a gift to the United States from France as a tribute to
American political traditions, the sonnet by the Jewish Emma Lazarus
helped change it into a symbol of immigration. Affixed to the base of
the statue several decades after its construction, the poem welcomes
to America "huddled masses yearning to breath free/The wretched refuse
of your teeming shore."
Prof. MacDonald has discovered that implausible arguments about
diversity being a quintessentially American strength have been made by
Jews for a long time. He reports that in 1948 the American Jewish
Committee was urging Congress to believe that "Americanism is the
spirit behind the welcome that America has traditionally extended to
people of all races, all religions, all nationalities." Of course,
there had never been such a tradition. In 1952, the American Jewish
Congress argued in hearings on immigration that "our national
experience has confirmed beyond a doubt that our very strength lies in
the diversity of our peoples." This, too, was at a time when U.S.
immigration law was still explicitly designed to maintain a white
majority.
It is often said that when the old immigration policy was scrapped in
1965, scarcely anyone knew, and no one predicted, that the new law
would change the racial makeup of the country. Prof. MacDonald
disputes this, arguing that this had been the objective of Jewish
groups from the beginning.
Prof. MacDonald finds that Jews have been the foremost advocates of
immigration in England, France, and Canada, and that Jewish groups
were the most vocal opponents of independence for Quebec. Australian
Jews led the effort to dismantle the "white Australia" policy, one
reason for which was cited in an editorial in the Australian Jewish
Democrat: "The strengthening of multi-cultural or diverse Australia is
also our most effective insurance policy against anti-Semitism. The
day Australia has a Chinese Australian Governor General I would feel
more confident of my freedom to live as a Jewish Australian." Like
Earl Raab writing about the United States, this Australian Jew is
prepared to sacrifice the traditional culture, people, and identity of
Australia to specifically Jewish interests. It would not be surprising
if such an openly expressed objective did not have the opposite effect
from the intended, and increase anti-Jewish sentiment.
Jews and the Left
It is well known that Jews have been traditionally associated with the
left, and Prof. MacDonald investigates this connection in some detail.
Historically it was understandable that Jews should support movements
that advocated overthrowing the existing order. After emancipation,
Jews met resistance from gentile elites who did not want to lose
ground to competitors, and outsiders easily become revolutionaries.
However, in Prof. MacDonald's view, Jewish commitment to leftist
causes has often been motivated by the hope that communism,
especially, would be a tool for combating anti-Semitism, and by
expectation that universalist social solutions would be yet another
way to dissolve gentile loyalties that might exclude Jews. The appeal
of univeralist ideologies is tied to the implicit understanding that
Jewish particularism will be exempt: "At the extreme, acceptance of a
universalist ideology by gentiles would result in gentiles not
perceiving Jews as in a different social category at all, while
nonetheless Jews would be able to maintain a strong personal identity
as Jews."
Prof. MacDonald argues that Jews had specifically Jewish reasons for
supporting the Bolshevik revolution. Czarist Russia was notorious for
its anti-Semitic policies and, during its early years, the Soviet
Union seemed to be the promised land for Jews: it ended state anti-
Semitism, tried to eradicate Christianity, opened opportunities to
individual Jews, and preached a "classless" society in which
Jewishness would presumably attract no negative attention. Moreover,
since Marxism taught that all conflict was economic rather than
ethnic, many Jews believed it heralded the end of anti-Semitism.
Prof. MacDonald emphasizes that although Jewish Communists preached
both atheism and the solidarity of the world's working people, they
took pains to preserve a distinct, secular Jewish identity. He reports
that Lenin himself (who had one Jewish grandparent) approved the
continuation of an explicitly Jewish identity under Communism, and in
1946 the Communist Party of the United States voted a resolution also
supporting Jewish peoplehood in Communist countries. Thus, although
Communism was supposed to be without borders or religion, Jews were
confident that it would make a place for their own group identity. He
writes that despite the official view that all men were to be
brothers, "very few Jews lost their Jewish identity during the entire
soviet era."
Jewish Communists sometimes betrayed remarkable particularism. Prof.
MacDonald quotes Charles Pappoport, the French Communist leader: "The
Jewish people [are] the bearer of all the great ideas of unity and
human community in history... The disappearance of the Jewish people
would signify the death of humankind, the final transformation of man
into a wild beast." This seems to attribute to Jews an elite position
incompatible with "unity and human community."
Prof. MacDonald argues that many Jews began to fall away from
Communism only after Stalin showed himself to be anti-Semitic. And
just as Jews had been the leading revolutionaries in anti-Semitic pre-
Revolutionary Russia, Jews became the leading dissidents in an anti-
Semitic Soviet Union. A similar pattern can be found in the imposed
Communist governments of Eastern Europe, which were largely dominated
by Jews. The majority of the leaders of the Polish Communist Party,
for example, spoke better Yiddish than Polish, and they too maintained
a strong Jewish identity. After the fall of Communism many stopped
being Polish and emigrated to Israel.
Prof. MacDonald writes that in Bela Kun's short-lived 1919 Communist
government of Hungary, 95 percent of the leaders were Jews, and that
at the time of the 1956 uprising Communism was so closely associated
with Jews that the rioting had almost the flavor of a pogrom. He
argues that in the United States as well, the hard core among
Communists and members of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) was
mainly Jewish. Here, too, a revolutionary, atheist, and universalist
world-view was fully compatible with strong identification as Jews.
Prof. MacDonald quotes from a study of American leftists:
"Many Communists, for example, state that they could never have
married a spouse who was not a leftist. When Jews were asked if they
could have married Gentiles, many hesitated, surprised by the
question, and found it difficult to answer. Upon reflection, many
concluded that they had always taken marriage to someone Jewish for
granted." Their commitment as Jews was even more fundamental and
unexamined than their commitment to the left.
Prof. MacDonald reports that many American Jews also abandoned
Communism as it became increasingly anti-Semitic. For a large number,
the Soviet Union's severing of diplomatic ties with Israel during the
1967 war was the last straw. A former SDS activist no doubt spoke for
many when he explained, "If I must choose between the Jewish cause and
a 'progressive' anti-Israel SDS, I shall choose the Jewish cause. If
barricades are erected, I will fight as a Jew." According to Prof.
MacDonald, American neoconservatism can also be described as a surface
shift in external politics that leaves the more fundamental commitment
to Jewish identity unchanged. Thus, former leftists abandoned an
ideology that had turned against Israel and refashioned American
conservatism into a different movement, the one unshakable theme of
which was support for Israel. Neoconservatives also support high
levels of immigration and were active in excluding white racial
identification from the "respectable" right.
Objections
There are many possible objections to Prof. MacDonald's thesis. The
first is that it is largely built on the assumption that Jews are
dishonest. It is always risky to assume one understands the motives of
others better than they do themselves. Jews have traditionally thought
of themselves as a benevolent presence, even as a "light unto the
nations" or a "chosen people." This is echoed today in the Jewish self
image as champions of the excluded and the oppressed. Most of the time
what passes for "social justice" has the effect of undermining the
traditions and loyalties of gentile society, but are Jews deliberately
undermining these things rather than righting what they perceive to be
wrongs?
Prof. MacDonald concedes that many Jews are sincere in their support
for liberal causes, but then escalates his indictment by arguing that
"the best deceivers are those who deceive themselves." In other words,
many Jews who are actually working for Jewish interests have first
convinced themselves otherwise. A Jew who mainly wants America to
become less white may also have convinced himself that America
benefits from a multitude of cultures. Having convinced himself he can
more effectively convince others.
Many Jews, Prof. MacDonald argues, are not even conscious of the
extent to which their Jewishness is central to their identities or
their political views. He quotes Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel on his
surprise at how passionately he embraced the Israeli side during the
1967 war: "I had not known how Jewish I was." This is an arresting
statement from a man who was thought to be perhaps the greatest Jewish
spiritual leader of his time. And whether or not it affects their
politics, Jews certainly appear to have a very vivid sense of
peoplehood. Prof. MacDonald quotes theologian Eugene Borowitz as
saying,"most Jews claim to be equipped with an interpersonal friend-or-
foe sensing device that enables them to detect the presence of another
Jew, despite heavy camouflage." Always to think in terms of "friends
or foe" is no insignificant matter.
Prof. MacDonald is therefore skeptical of Jewish disavowals: "Surface
declarations of a lack of Jewish identity may be highly misleading."
He notes that Jewish publications write about the power and influence
of American Jews in language Jews would immediately denounce as "anti-
Semitic" if used by gentiles. He agrees with Joseph Sobran, who has
said "they want to be Jews among themselves but resent being seen as
Jews by Gentiles. They want to pursue their own distinct interests
while pretending that they have no such interests..."
Prof. MacDonald argues that the success of Jewish-led intellectual
movements has been possible only because their Jewish character was
hidden. If multi-culturalism or mass immigration or The Authoritarian
Personality had been promoted by Orthodox Jews in black coats the
Jewish element would have been clear. Prof. MacDonald writes that in
fact, "the Jewish political agenda was not an aspect of the theory and
the theories themselves had no overt Jewish content. Gentile
intellectuals approaching these theories were therefore unlikely to
view them as aspects of Jewish-gentile cultural competition or as an
aspect of a specifically Jewish political agenda." Prof. MacDonald
also claims that Jews have often tried to conceal the Jewish character
of an intellectual movement by recruiting token gentiles for visible
positions as spokesmen. He writes that this tactic was so common in
the American Communist Party that gentiles often saw through it and
resigned.
But how can motives ever be completely known? Prof. MacDonald sets a
difficult test: "The best evidence that individuals have really ceased
to have a Jewish identity is if they choose a political option that
they perceive as clearly not in the interest of Jews as a group. In
the absence of a clearly perceived conflict with Jewish interests, it
remains possible that different political choices among ethnic Jews
are only differences in tactics for how best to achieve Jewish
interests."
This standard may seem unduly harsh - until it is applied to white
gentiles. Third-World immigration, affirmative action, anti-
discrimination laws, and forced integration are clearly not in the
interests of whites, yet many whites embrace them, thus demonstrating
how completely they have abandoned their racial identity.
Finally, Prof. MacDonald raises the disturbing possibility that some
Jews, because of centuries of conflict with gentiles, actively hate
gentile society and consciously wish to destroy it: "a fundamental
motivation of Jewish intellectuals involved in social criticism has
simply been hatred of the gentile-dominated power structure perceived
as anti-Semitic." He describes the 19th century German-Jewish poet
Heinrich Heine as "using his skill, reputation and popularity to
undermine the intellectual confidence of the established order."
In defense of this highly provocative view, Prof. MacDonald quotes
Benjamin Disraeli on the effects of centuries of Jewish-gentile
relations on Jews: "They may have become so odious and so hostile to
mankind as to merit for their present conduct, no matter how
occasioned, the obloquy and ill-treatment of the communities in which
they dwell and with which they are scarcely permitted to mingle."
Apart from any questions of motives, however, is the question of
numbers. Jews are a tiny minority in the United States and within that
minority there is disagreement even on matters that clearly affect
Jews. How can Jews possibly be responsible for dramatic changes in the
intellectual landscape? In Prof. MacDonald's view, the explanation
lies in the intelligence, energy, dedication, and cohesiveness of
Jews. He attributes a great deal to the average IQ of Jews - at 115, a
full standard deviation above the white gentile average - and to
"their hard work and dedication, their desire to make a mark on the
world, and their desire to rise in the world, engage in personal
promotion, and achieve public acclaim..." He also believes Jews have
worked together unfailingly on any question they consider necessary
for survival: "Intellectual activity is like any other human endeavor:
Cohesive groups outcompete individual strategies." He notes that there
has never been a time when large numbers of white Americans favored
non-white immigration; it was a cohesive, determined minority that
beat down the disorganized resistance of the majority.
Prof. MacDonald believes that because of the effectiveness of some
Jews, it was not even necessary that most Jews actively support anti-
majoritarian movements, but that Jewish activity was still decisive.
As he puts it, "Jewish-dominated intellectual movements were a
critical factor (necessary condition) for the triumph of the
intellectual left in late twentieth-century Western societies." This,
of course, can never be tested, but there can be no doubt that
American Jews have had a disproportionate effect on the American
intellect. Prof. MacDonald quotes Walter Kerr, writing in 1968, to the
effect that "what has happened since World War II is that the American
sensibility has become part Jewish, perhaps as much Jewish as it is
anything else... The literate American mind has come in some measure
to think Jewishly."
Aside from the question of whether Prof. MacDonald is right is the
further question of what difference it makes if he is right. If
correct, his thesis certainly sheds light on the rapidity with which
whites lost their will. Just a few decades ago whites were a confident
race, proud of their achievements, convinced of their fitness to
dominate the globe. Today they are a declining, apologetic people,
ashamed of their history and not sure even of their claim to lands
they have occupied for centuries. It is very rare for fundamental
concepts to be stood on their heads in the course of just a generation
or two, as has happened with thinking about race. Such speed suggests
there has been something more than natural change.
Originally appeared in American Renaissance, June 1999, issue 54
entitled 'Cherchez le Juif.' Stanley Hornbeck is the pen name of a
Washington, DC area businessman. Kevin MacDonald, The Culture of
Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-
Century Intellectual and Political Movements, Praeger (1998) $65.00,
379 pp.
http://www.amazon.com/Culture-Critique-Evolutionary-Twentieth-Century-
Intellectual/dp/0759672229/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?
ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1199578 633&sr=8-1
PDF:
www.prometheism.net/library/CultureOfCritique.pdf
http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/Blog.htm
So, Who are the 'Jews'?
While this list may never be complete, it will cover most of the
jewish names one is likely to encounter in everyday Western life.
Unlike many gentile names, there is such a thing as a 'Jewish name.'
Many Jewish persons can be recognized as being Jewish by their
surname [last name], although not always--some Jews are adopted, or
their forebears changed the family surname, or their surname simply
does not appear Jewish.
Here are the most common Jewish names likely to be encountered:
-Names ending in "-berg" (Goldberg, Weinberg, etc.)
-Names ending in "-man" (Goldman, Lightman, etc.)
-Names ending in "-stein" (Einstein, Perlstein, etc.)
-Names that sound "precious" (Gold, Silver, Diamond, Ruby
(Rubenstein) etc.)
-Names ending in "-ler" (Adler, Midler, etc.)
-Names ending in "-ner" (Asner, Lardner, etc.)
-Names ending in "-lin" (Gitlin, Sheindlin, etc.)
-Names ending in "-band" (Miliband, Goldband, etc.)
-Names ending in "-witz" (Horowitz, Rabinowitz, etc.) or "-
itz" (Kravitz, etc.)
-Names ending in "-baum" (Teitelbaum, Metzenbaum, etc.)
-Names ending in "-off" (Chartoff, Berkhoff, etc.)
-Names ending in "-nik" (Resnik, Mitnik, etc.)
-Names ending in "-thal" (Blumenthal, Rosenthal, etc.)
-Names ending in "-ling" (Spelling, Sperling, etc.)
-Names ending in "-sky" (Barshefsky, Linsky, etc.)
-Names ending in "-farb" (Himmelfarb, Goldfarb, etc.)
-Names ending in "-feld" (Seinfeld, Rosenfeld, etc.)
-Names ending in "-stone" (Wellstone, Firestone, etc.)
-Some, but certainly not all, names ending in "-son" (Abelson,
Josephson, etc.)
-Surnames that sound "Biblical," e.g., David, Joseph, Abram or
Abraham, Moses, Benjamin, Isaac, etc.
Some other names commonly used by jewish immigrants:
-Miller -Davis -Ross -Lewis -Roth -Morris -Davidson -Green -Wolf -
Newman -Gross -Harris -Sherman -Myers -Mayer -Jacobs -Aaron -Michael -
Hirsch -Raphael -Tobias -Levy -Brand -Cohen -Kaplan -Weiss -Nathan -
Leo -Levine -Simon -Levin -Samuel -Falk -Wise -Gottfried -Gottlieb -
Mann -Mathis -May -Mars -Marx -Marks -Saul -Gould -Fink -Loeb -Loew -
Rubin -Stern -Shapiro -Klein -Cohn -Singer -Frank -Schwartz -Rich -
Kahn -Kramer
http://www.natvan.com/who-rules-america www.iamthewitness.com
www.judicial-inc.biz www.jewwatch.com www.davidduke.com
Israeli stats
http://www.ifamericansknew.org/
What you need if going to you tube
http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/
http://get.adobe.com/shockwave/
And if you r still using IE6 it might not pick up so use mozilla.
http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/
Israeli stats
http://www.ifamericansknew.org/
True Torah Jews Against Zionism
http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/
Over 10,000 Orthodox Jews protesting the existence of the state of
Israel, and the recent beating of Orthodox Jews who protested in Israel
against the uprooting of Jewish cemeteries of antiquity which was done
in order to enable the construction of a highway #6, near Haifa, Israel
- protest in front of the Israeli consulate New York City, Thursday,
April 28, 2005
NETUREI KARTA AROUND THE WORLD
Flag Burning in Protest of Zionist State
http://www.nkusa.org/
Jews against Zionism: The Hidden Protest
http://www.realnews247.com/spec_rpt_jews_against_zionism.htm
http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR-Jewish-Bolshevism-Jewish%20Role.html
Jews just doing what they always do. Just more prominent today. But that's
what 100 million Christians went through, and will again in America if they
are not careful about who wields their power.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7805075.stm
http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=tW1-_JmXQt0&feature=related
http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=ynWjYHP91gA&feature=related
http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=DYuWOi56Wq0&feature=related
http://s252.photobucket.com/albums/hh28/BenCramer1/?action=view¤t=YidKidsinHebron.jpg
"LIBERATOR" <glimb...@yahoo.com wrote in message
news:af6c41c5-94ba-498a...@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
http://www.adolfhitlerresearchsociety.org/
Facts countering the lies you've been told - the Jews wore yellow
stars in camps - it was Zionist Jews that originated the wearing of
the yellow star:
http://www.adolfthegreat.com/Trails-Trivia/trivia-JewsForHitler.html
The Zionist Jew, Georg Kareski, repeatedly urged the Nazi government
to introduce a Jewish Star of David, to be worn by Jews. Eventually
his suggestion was accepted and On October 1939 it was ordered (by
Chief of Defense Canaris) that this measure should be introduced in
the General Government, and on September 15, 1941 it was ordered for
the entire Reich.
http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4YaZBXd-peo
http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/Dissenters1/Zundel1/transport.htm
England's Lord Shawcross, her most famous legal mind, stated in 1984. ''I
have come to the realization that Hitler did not want war. It was us who
declared war .'', etc. ad nauseum. His admission of historical truth was
subsequently swept under the rug, never to be repeated in public print
again.
http://666ismoney.com/HolocaustAds.html
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1569802351/103-1175775-5239804?v=glance&n=2
83155
http://www.counterpunch.org/brenner05252005.html
http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2002/12/1553622.php
http://www.marxists.de/middleast/brenner/index.htm
AND LAST BUT NOT LEAST - HOW THE USA CONTROLS AND RUNS ISRAEL???
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tank_Man
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44/Tank-Man
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/tankman/
UK Tory leader criticised over Auschwitz comment
10:57AM Sunday February 24, 2008
The government announced this month it would give ?A3;4.65 ($11)
million to the Holocaust Educational Trust - set up in 1988 to educate
young people about the Holocaust.
The money will help the trust extend visits to Auschwitz, where some
1.5 million people, mostly Jews, died.
Wrong - if you talk about school children at least get it right.
And brown has no right to impose his jewish distortion of history onto the
non jewish children of Britain.
WARNING To People in Austria; Belgium; France; Germany;
Israel; Spain and Switzerland. You can be fined,imprisoned or both for
discussing the topics set forth in this article.
Israeli stats
http://www.ifamericansknew.org/
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4138523842550891901#0h53m09s
http://666ismoney.com/HolocaustAds.html
I, Raquel Baranow am a Grad Student of Holocaust Denial. There are persons
with PhD's in various fields who
also deny the 6 million canard. The best evidence is forensic. Until
recently, there was never a forensic
examination of the alleged murder weapon (gas chambers). Demographic figures
are incomplete. After the fall
of East Europe to communism, many of the millions of Jews who fled Poland
into the Soviet Union or ended up
behind the Iron Curtain changed their names to assimilate, many civilians
died in the war, many died in the
concentration camps of louse-born typhus. During World War One, two million
civilians in the Soviet Union died
of typhus. Many died in Stalin's gulags.
Yad Vashem,( http://www.yadvashem.org/wps/portal/IY_HON_Welcome)a Holocaust
Documentation Center in Israel has a database of 3,000,000 alleged victims
of Nazi
extermination. But as you can see HERE
(http://666ismoney.com/YadVashem.html) (my maiden name, Friedemann), nearly
every name is listed at least
twice, some as many as five times!
http://www.yadvashem.org/lwp/workplace/IY_HON_Welcome
Yad Vashem's 3,000,000 "Holocaust victims" database lists nearly
everyone twice. Some as many at five times. Anyone, including
you can submit a "Page of Testimony".
And of course we have lists duplicated, unconfirmed, but 3m according to our
usual jewish/Zionist sources.
Put your name in, you might be missing out on reparations.
Has been improvements since this, numbers still very dicey.
Name Town District Region
Country Bday Source
Friedemann Adolf Berlin Berlin Berlin Germany
1879 list of victims from Germany
Friedemann Adolf Berlin Berlin Berlin Germany
1879 list of deportation from Berlin
Friedemann Adolf Berlin Berlin Berlin Germany
1905 list of deportation from Berlin
It is forensically impractical or impossible to exterminate millions with
louse disinfestant (hydrogen cyanide gas)
or diesel exhaust as alleged by malicious "witnesses" or tortured
confessors. There are no written orders for
extermination. Aerial reconnaissance photographs of the concentration camps
show no smoke and flames
belching from the crematoria and pyres as alleged. The photos and records
show there was not enough coke or
crematoria to cremate millions of corpses. The "witnesses" and confessors
lied about how many minutes it takes
to cremate a corpse. Diesel exhaust does not contain significant amount of
carbon monoxide to kill a human. If
the Nazis wanted to kill millions they could have driven the coal fired
train into a tunnel or quonset hut and gassed
'em with the exhaust from the locomotive or used the exhaust from the
crematoria. At Auschwitz, during a typhus
epidemic, up to 300 people died per day, hence the crematoria, shaving of
heads and requisitions for tons of
Zyklon B louse disinfestant. HCN is a very dangerous, impractical, messy
method for extermination.
http://www.vho.org/
The Holocaust Controversy A Case for open Debate
The Gas Chambers are a fraud, a tourist attraction, slander, demonizing,
impractical/impossible, malicious
atrocity propaganda spread by the communists, who hated Hitler and
perpetrated by Jews, who were always
looking for ways to get to the lands of milk and money. The Jews have
extorted billions from the US Treasury,
Germany, Swiss banks and insurance companies on account of the Holohoax
fraud. The Holohoax also makes
those who fought Hitler feel like they did something good fighting the
demon, Hitler instead of letting Hitler take
on Stalin alone.
A "liberal" person has an open mind. A bigot is irrational and obstinate.
CHECK THE Talmud
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-6657600254881054584&hl=en
CHECK THE WHOLE HOLOHOAXING BUNCH.
http://www.zundelsite.org/english/debate/009_jam.html
Mans wife killed.
http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=tW1-_JmXQt0&feature=related
Family Killed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_CRzdlA5To&feature=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_CRzdlA5To&feature=channel
http://thirdworldtraveler.com/Israel/IsraelsTortureBan.html
teens killed while swimming.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3nYgioaKRu4&feature=channel
http://www.zundelsite.org/english/debate/009_jam.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7805075.stm
B J Foster
> <wis...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:hcnif5heuammllots...@4ax.com...
>> http://www.stormfront.org/
>>
>> Marvelous forum, vital information for
>> American citizens.
>>
>> ted
>
> WELL APPARENTLY THERE IS NO ONE TO TURN TO IF YOU DONT LIKE JEWISH
> DOMINATION OF WHAT IS GOING ON IN THE WORLD AND ISRAEL IN OUR NAME AND WITH
> OUR MONEY.
IT'S NOT AN ISSUE BECAUSE WE LIKE JEWISH DOMINATION.
IN FACT, WE'RE THINKING OF EXPORTING ALL THE NEO-NAZI FUCKWITS TO IRAN
TO BECOME SEX TOYS FOR THE AYATOLLAH.
mose
"B J Foster" <bjfo...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:hde8lq$iv2$1...@bjf.motzarella.org...
TUT TUT BJ YOU LEFT OUT HOW THE PRESENT GOVERNMENT JUST LIKE THE LAST GIVES
NON JEWS NO VOICE .
SO WE ARE LEFT WITH BEING DICTATED TO AND FORCED TO ACCEPT VALUES STRAIGHT
FROM THE TALMUD. SO YOU HAD BETTER CHECK HOW IT ALL WORKS.
CHECK THE Talmud
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-6657600254881054584&hl=en
CHECK THE WHOLE HOLOHOAXING BUNCH.
http://www.zundelsite.org/english/debate/009_jam.html
Mans wife killed.
http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=tW1-_JmXQt0&feature=related
Family Killed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_CRzdlA5To&feature=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_CRzdlA5To&feature=channel
http://thirdworldtraveler.com/Israel/IsraelsTortureBan.html
teens killed while swimming.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3nYgioaKRu4&feature=channel
http://www.zundelsite.org/english/debate/009_jam.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7805075.stm
Jewish officials in a major Italian news agency tried to cover the story
up, but were circumvented by Italian news reporters, who broadcast scenes
from the films live at prime time on Italian television to more than 11
million Italian viewers. Jewish officials then fired the executives
responsible, claiming they were spreading "blood libel."
Rome, Italy -- Italian and Russian police, working together, broke up a
http://www.ety.com/HRP/jewishstudies/snuffporn.htm
are just doing their job.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Culture_of_Critique_series
http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/books.htm
http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/PrefacePPB.pdf
Celebrating Diversity
Authoritarian Personalities
Immigration
Jews and the Left
Objections
PDF:
www.prometheism.net/library/CultureOfCritique.pdf
http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/Blog.htm
Israeli stats
http://www.ifamericansknew.org/
http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/
http://get.adobe.com/shockwave/
http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/
Israeli stats
http://www.ifamericansknew.org/
http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR-Jewish-Bolshevism-Jewish%20Role.html
http://www.adolfhitlerresearchsociety.org/
http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4YaZBXd-peo
http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/Dissenters1/Zundel1/transport.htm
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44/Tank-Man
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/tankman/
Israeli stats
http://www.ifamericansknew.org/
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4138523842550891901#0h53m09s
AS WITH ABU GRAIB.
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/slavery.htm
http://www.blacksandjews.com/Jews_and_Slavery.htmlhttp://www.realjewnews.com/?p=99President
Andrew Jackson, the only one of our presidents whose administration totally
abolished the National Debt, condemned the international bankers as a "den
of vipers" which he was determined to "rout out" of the fabric of American
life. Jackson claimed that if only the American people understood how these
vipers operated on the American scene "there would a revolution before
morning." http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=99
In 1828, immediately upon his election as the new President of the US,
President Andrew Jackson began an investigation of the Second Bank of the
United States. President Jackson argued that the bank was privately owned
with stockholders from foreign nations who had political agendas at odds
with the United States. President Jackson, an avowed Christian, is known for
these famous words against the Rothschilds:
- "You are a den of thieves vipers, and I intend to rout you out, and by the
Eternal God, I will rout you out." -
Ruud66
"mose" <mo...@capp.com> wrote in message
news:uyxKm.54009$ze1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> <wis...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:hcnif5heuammllots...@4ax.com...
>> http://www.stormfront.org/
>>
>> Marvelous forum, vital information for
>> American citizens.
>>
>> ted
>
> WELL APPARENTLY THERE IS NO ONE TO TURN TO IF YOU DONT LIKE JEWISH
> DOMINATION OF WHAT IS GOING ON IN THE WORLD AND ISRAEL IN OUR NAME AND
> WITH OUR MONEY.
This such old bogus that it aint funny again.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion
Get over yourself, Every muslim terrorist carries this around in a
translated version.
R
B J Foster
> "B J Foster" <bjfo...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote in message
> news:hde8lq$iv2$1...@bjf.motzarella.org...
>>
>> IN FACT, WE'RE THINKING OF EXPORTING ALL THE NEO-NAZI FUCKWITS TO IRAN TO
>> BECOME SEX TOYS FOR THE AYATOLLAH.
>>
You'll be safe with the Ayatollah - you can even take your lederhosen,
whips and chains along with you:
http://www.thegully.com/essays/iran/001113ayatollah.html
mose
"Ruud66" <ruu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4afadf40$0$1644$703f...@textnews.kpn.nl...
BE A FAKE BY A DYING MAN???
LIKE JOE FORRESTAL??
(Joe Kennedy) The American Secretary of State, James Forrestal, who later
died in mysterious circumstances, wrote in his Forrestal Diaries (Cassel and
Co., London 1952):
'Have played golf with Joe Kennedy [US Ambassador in Britain, father of
President John Kennedy]. According to him, Chamberlain declared that Zionism
and world Jewry have obliged England to enter the war.'
http://www.heretical.com/mkilliam/wwii.html
AND YET THEY SEEM TO HAVE BEEN AN ACCURATE DESCRIPTION OF WHAT IS HAPPENING
TODAY.
HOWEVER THAT WAS NOT THE ONLY POINT I RAISED.
HOWEVER LEAVING THAT BEHIND -
-(John F Kennedy) Sometime in the late 1950s, that world-class gossip and
occasional historian, John F. Kennedy, told me how, in 1948, Harry S. Truman
had been pretty much abandoned by everyone when he came to run for
president. Then an American Zionist brought him two million dollars in cash,
in a suitcase, aboard his whistle-stop campaign train. 'That's why our
recognition of Israel was rushed through so fast.' As neither Jack nor I was
an antisemite (unlike his father and my grandfather) we took this to be just
another funny story about Truman and the serene corruption of American
politics
http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-usa-truman.html
Unfortunately, the hurried recognition of Israel as a state has resulted in
forty-five years of murderous confusion, and the destruction of what Zionist
fellow travellers thought would be a pluralistic state - home to its native
population of Muslims, Christians and Jews
bourgeoisie Jewish code for non Jew) In Russia, 100,000,000 bourgeousie
were exterminated. None of them were Jews. All were Christians. Most of the
generals in charge of these anti-Christian pogroms were Jews. Stalin
considered Jews to be the only
real communists that could be trusted. - Bolshevik State. . . there were in
1918-1919, 17 Russians, 2 Ukrainians, 11 Armenians, 35 Letts,15 Germans, 1
Hungarian, 10 Georgians, 3 Poles, 3 Finns, 1 Karaim, 457 Jews -
http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-occupiedgovernments-USSR.html -
http://www.oicu2.com/afc/letter.html -
http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-leaders-yagoda.html
Alexander Solzhenitsyn is the "father of democracy" in Russia. In one of his
books, the first volume of "Gulag Archipelago," he wrote about how the
communists in Russia, who consisted of only the Jews and a tiny minority of
Russian criminals, amoral opportunists, and welfare rabble were able to
maintain their grip on all of Russia by keeping the Russian majority, which
hated them, too frightened to resist.
Lest you think there must be some truth to the alleged Treblinka holocaust
NAFCASH TM is offering a $250,000.00 REWARD
For locating JUST ONE of the alleged "HUGE MASS GRAVES" of Treblinka
NAFCASH TM presents
THE TREBLINKA CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATION CHALLENGE TM
You must scientifically - forensically prove the grave's EXACT location,
its EXACT dimensions and its EXACT volumetric density.
The cremated remains must total AT LEAST one percent of the alleged mass
murder.
JUST ONE MASS GRAVE! - JUST ONE PERCENT!
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/holohoax.htm
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article21878.htm
Israeli warlord vows face-off with Iran:
http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=84344§ionid=351020104
Keep in mind that the 'A Clean Break' (war for Israel) agenda was
written for Netanyahu (access the 'A Clean Break' link at the upper
right of
http://NEOCONZIONISTTHREAT.COM)
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/holohoax.htm
A look at these healthy happy jews will make you wonder just a little more
about the hardship claims.
http://globalfire.tv/nj/03en/letters/2003oct_nbr01.htm
This is a contribution to your inquiry about the label: "holocaust-denial".
First of all there was NO holocaust, other than those taking place in every
country that is at war.
The incarceration of "enemies of the state" is a world-wide practice. The
primary question here is; what constitutes a holocaust? Camps, depravation,
imprisonment, harsh treatment, executions, hunger etc.?
Those conditions exist in all camps, in all nations, under all regimes.
Remember Andersonville, Manzanar, the Gulags, the British camps in Africa,
the American death-camps in Germany, they all constitute a "holocaust" if
viewed through the lenses of Jewish "holocaust-sufferers".
Read the Red Cross reports. Go to the Red Cross museum, headquarters
in your city and pick up the records. Anyway theres a few independent
witnesses.
http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndstats.html
There are other indications as well that the theory of mass destruction of
the Hungarian Jews is incorrect: the witnesses to this destruction
unanimously claim that during these alleged mass exterminations the limited
capacity of the Birkenau crematoria necessitated the excavation of enormous
pits, in which the bodies were burned. Dark clouds of smoke, they claim,
darkened the sky over Birkenau during this procedure. Fortunately (or
unfortunately, depending on one's perspective) the aerial reconnaissance
photographs taken by the Allies during this time prove that in the Birkenau
camp, which was not obscured by clouds of smoke when the pictures were
taken, there were neither open fires, nor giant pits, nor smoke activity on
any scale large or small, nor piles of dead bodies, nor great supplies of
firewood, nor anything else of the sort.[45] The Polish Historical Society
concludes that in light of this evidence the number of victims in Auschwitz
must be reduced by another 400,000 plus 74,000 (Polish Jews from the
liquidated ghetto Lodz, who are also claimed to have been gassed around this
time), leaving some 500,000 victims for Auschwitz.[46]
Even allegedly probative documents of the Nuremberg Tribunal cannot change
this, since such documents are by no means always genuine, or true, and only
ever provide evidence for deportations which are not disputed here in the
first place - they never document an extermination. The reader is reminded
of the example of Dachau, the concentration camp where the IMT alleged that
hundreds of thousands were gassed, a claim which in the end turned out to be
nothing more substantial than an atrocity propaganda lie.[47] We shall come
across another case of dubious IMT documents in the discussion of the Soviet
Union.
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/print.asp?ID=2735
http://www.rense.com/general69/factua.htm
Rassinier seems to wrap it up.
http://www.ihr.org/books/rassinier/debunking1-0.html
Jews will once again subject Robert Faurisson (aged 78) to a trial for
"holocaust denial." The French judicial police served Faurisson a summons
demanding that he appear in court this Thursday (24 Jan 08). Faurisson is
charged with attending the December 11, 2006 conference in Iran titled,
"Review of the Holocaust: Global Vision."
This will be the fifteenth time that Jews have hauled Faurisson into court.
Jews have already frozen his bank account, while court officials have
repeatedly visited his home, threatening him and his wife with seizure of
their furniture to pay for financial "damages" caused by his "heretical"
remarks.
Faurisson is arguably the most thorough of all examiners of the holo-hoax.
Ernst Z�ndel, Gemar Rudolph and others are in prison, but Jews consider
Faurisson enemy #1, because of the meticulousness of his work. And since the
holo-hoax cannot be defended with reason and science, Jews use oppressive
laws and prison sentences to protect it from rational criticism. In many
cases they use extreme violence, as you will see later in this post.
Fortunately the Goyim are too cowardly to resist Jewish terrorism.
At the Iran conference, Faurisson said that for the past 32 years, he has
been waiting for someone to show him one of the chambers where Jews where
supposedly gassed during the holo-hoax.
In July 2006, a Paris court convicted Faurisson of "holocaust denial"
because of remarks made by Faurisson on the Sahar 1 Iranian satellite
channel in February 2005. Faurisson was given a three-month suspended prison
term, and was also fined 7,500 euros.
The former Prime Minister of France, Dominique de Villepin, said, "We [the
French people] are in a democracy. Everyone has the right to express his
views freely."
Therefore all defamatory remarks against Muslims or Islam are protected as
"free speech."
However, any questioning of the holo-hoax or Jewish atrocities is illegal.
The Gayssot Act of 1990 - initiated by President Jaques Chirac -- prohibits
any questioning or examination of the holo-hoax.
Faurisson's specialty is examining documents and manuscripts. In 1991 he was
fired from his university post for questioning the holo-hoax. He was charged
with violating the Gayssot Act, (Loi Gayssot) passed on 13 July 1990 that
makes it illegal in France to question the holo-hoax. The law was proposed
by the communist deputy Jean-Claude Gayssot, and is one of several European
laws that make it illegal to examine the holo-hoax.
Its first article states that "any discrimination founded on the membership
or non-membership to an ethnic group, a nation, a race or a religion is
prohibited."
Discrimination against Muslims, of course, is permissible.
When Faurisson was terminated at the university, he appealed to the ICCPRHRC
(International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and Human Rights
Committee). This is a UN group that polices literature for any questioning
of the holo-hoax. (It is not to be confused with the more high-profile
Commission on Human Rights, a Charter-based mechanism, or its replacement,
the Human Rights Council, which of course is controlled by Jews.)
http://www.von-waldenburg.com/reviews.html
A person who lived in Germany during the war.
http://www.icrc.org/Web/Eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/57JNX3
Frederich Born leader of the ICRC in Hungary and honored by the jews.
Of course that strengthens the credibility of the Yad Vashem and who can
say anything about a man being honored and who probably deserved the hnor.
Most of their purchases of
relief food were made in Rumania, Hungary and Slovakia.
Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jews
avoid internment altogether, but the emigration of Jews continued
throughout the war, generally by way of Hungary, Rumania and Turkey.
But they were living in the best part of Europe as far as food was
concerned. And the terrible reflects the difficulties of keeping people in
camps and all the terribles do not describe genocide, or even conditions as
bad as Israel today.
And the fact that some leaders might have stretched the truth about what
they thought Hitler said or thought about killing of jews, there is no proof
of genocide as a policy and no treatment as there is in Israel today. Of
attacking people with planes, helicopters, and tanks. As happens in Israel
on a daily basis.
The Toben case today:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/oct/17/germany-australia
"Johnny Asia" <bardi...@mypacks.net wrote in message
news:o_mdnWiesd-_YMrU...@earthlink.com...
�
Among the fooled, at least the partially fooled, was Berenbaum, former
director of the United States Holocaust Research Institute at the U.S.
Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington. Berenbaum had been asked to read
the manuscript by film producer Harris Salomon, who still plans an
adaptation of the book.
Berenbaum's tentative support - "Crazier things have happened," he told
The
Associated Press last fall - was cited by the publisher as it initially
defended the book. Berenbaum now says he saw factual errors, including
Rosenblat's description of Theresienstadt, the camp from which he was
eventually liberated, but didn't think of challenging the love story.
"There's a limit to what I can verify, because I was not there," he says.
"I
can verify the general historical narrative, but in my research I rely
upon
the survivors to present the specifics of their existence with integrity.
When they don't, they destroy so much and they ruin so much, and that's
terrible."
"I was burned," he added. "And I have to read books more skeptically
because
I was burned."
Anger, sadness over fabricated Holocaust story
By HILLEL ITALIE, AP National Writer - Sun Dec 28, 1:09 pm ET
NEW YORK - It's the latest story that touched, and betrayed, the world.
"Herman Rosenblat and his wife are the most gentle, loving, beautiful
people," literary agent Andrea Hurst said Sunday, anguishing over why
she,
and so many others, were taken by Rosenblat's story of love born on
opposite
sides of a barbed-wire fence at a concentration camp.
"I question why I never questioned it. I believed it; it was an
incredible,
hope-filled story."
On Saturday, Berkley Books canceled Rosenblat's memoir, "Angel at the
Fence." Rosenblat acknowledged that he and his wife did not meet, as they
had said for years, at a sub-camp of Buchenwald, where she allegedly
sneaked
him apples and bread. The book was supposed to come out in February.
Rosenblat, 79, has been married to the former Roma Radzicky for 50 years,
since meeting her on a blind date in New York. In a statement issued
Saturday through his agent, he described himself as an advocate of love
and
tolerance who falsified his past to better spread his message.
"I wanted to bring happiness to people," said Rosenblat, who now lives in
the Miami area. "I brought hope to a lot of people. My motivation was to
make good in this world."
Rosenblat's believers included not only his agent and his publisher, but
Oprah Winfrey, film producers, journalists, family members and strangers
who
ignored, or didn't know about, the warnings from scholars that his story
didn't make sense.
Other Holocaust memoirists have devised greater fantasies. Misha
Defonseca,
author of "Misha: A Memoire of the Holocaust Years," pretended she was a
Jewish girl who lived with wolves during the war, when she was actually a
non-Jew who lived, without wolves, in Belgium.
Historical records prove Rosenblat was indeed at Buchenwald and other
camps.
"How sad that he felt he had to embellish a life of surviving the
Holocaust
and of being married for half a century," said Holocaust scholar Michael
Berenbaum.
The damage is broad. Publishing, the most trusting of industries, has
again
been burned by a memoir that fact-checking might have prevented. Berkley
is
an imprint of Penguin Group (USA), which in March pulled Margaret B.
Jones'
"Love and Consequences" after the author acknowledged she had invented
her
story of gang life in Los Angeles. Winfrey fell, as she did with James
Frey,
for a narrative of suffering and redemption better suited for television
than for history.
The damage is deep. Scholars and other skeptics as well as fellow
survivors
fear that Rosenblat's fabrications will only encourage doubts about the
Holocaust.
"I am very worried because many of us speak to thousands of student each
year," says Sidney Finkel, a longtime friend of Rosenblat's and a fellow
survivor. "We go before audiences. We tell them a story and now some
people
will question what I experienced."
--
+
Pucker your lips for the Apocalypse!
Johnny Asia, Guitarist from the Future
http://music.download.com/johnnyasia
"If you want to know what the future of
music sounds like..listen to Johnny Asia,
then you'll know!" - Jazz Guitarist Dom Minasi
+
http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecwar.html
� http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/ds9.htm
� http://www.rense.com/general45/zzo.htm
� http://www.heretical.com/mkilliam/wwii.html
And at the bottom see the person who profited from lies and is behind the
false story that is used to put our truth seeking teachers in jail.
These teachers are no more than the plumber Joe's of the acadenic world
being illtreated because of part of out population who want to support the
lies because of the huge incomes derived from these lies.
These sites below show up the huge lies and why.
Libraries, brothels, swimming??IN AUSWICHTZ???
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4138523842550891901#0h53m09s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dyBMuSYLGk
Next we have the German records where no mention of killing of jews has been
found.In fact the documents like this month disprove the huge distortions
and exaggerations made by the jewish contingent.
And as in the country today the numbers actually involved considering that
millions fought with and served Germany against what was jews against their
country of residence.
http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/history/zionism/news.php?q=1196891581
http://www.curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=888061
http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/1966
http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/130513
http://www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/htmlall/section_second_world_war?OpenDocumenthttp://www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/68zeb2?opendocumenthttp://www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/6ayg86Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activitiesduring the Second World War, Geneva, 1948.You will find thousands of jewish funded museums amd so calleduniversitiesthat supposedly have evidence , also the reports themselves havebeen contaminated by jewish academics and supporters continual injectionsthat the Red Cross did not see.The Red Cross is not political or historical so keptrecords of it's actions,and if astrocities occurred they recorded them just as they do today.And the only evidence offered by holocaust supporters is the usual suspectexaggerations from reparation seeking jews castigated by honest honest jewsfor this horrible use of what suffering there was during this period.Despite the suffering of the jews it was not as much as Europeans as a wholesuffered with over 5 million imprisoned, a much hight number than the realnumber of jews . And free for anyone to investigate without fear ofimprisonment.Not to mention the disrupted lives of Europeans when their homes and townsbecame the battlefields of WW2.To emphasize the determined efforts of the jews to stay in the limelight bypushing all other victims to the back while they bask in the limelight , ina lot of cases undeservedly so. http://www.scrapbookpages.com/Poland/Crosses/Crosses.htmlAs an example the Polish who is the one country who had more (3 million -figures you can examine without fear of harassment) wanted to put up crossesfor victims , who were in there mostly for helping and supporting jews inPoland. Were castigated and criticised by jewish groups claiming theremembrances should only be for their victims, and not be over shadowed byChristian victims.http://www.scrapbookpages.com/Poland/Crosses/Crosses.htmlhttp://www.holocaustforgotten.com/poland.htmhttp://www.holocaustforgotten.com/All that comes out clearly, whatever the reason that the jews were held incamps, there was great co operation by the jews themselves, this forced themto find excuses for their behavior, and easiest was lying about thecruelties of the Germans that caused this co operation. Rather falls downwhen there is no gassing and if camps were simply holding camps.As their own leaders said.The Jewish ghetto police always had the option, she said, of "throwing offtheir uniforms and joining the rest of us" - a point that Yitzak Zuckerman,a leader of the Warsaw ghetto uprising, made in his memoir.http://www.theexperiment.org/articles.php?news_id=2139There is not a shred of evidence, for example, that "a gas chamber was in the process of being built at Dachau, but it was never completed." (See "The Second Leuchter Report" by American gas chamber expert Fred Leuchter in The Journal of Historical Review, Fall 1990.) There is likewise no proof that "mentally and physically handicapped people were killed" by gas at any of the four "institutions" Wiesenthal mentions. This US Army photo was taken at Dachau on April 30, 1945, one day after the camp's capture. It shows a GI standing in front of a door marked with a skull and crossbones and the words "Caution! Gas! Life danger! Do not open!" According to the official caption, "these chambers were used by Nazi guards for killing prisoners of the infamous Dachau concentration camp." In fact, this is a small disinfection gas chamber used for delousing clothes. It was never used to kill people. For several decades, this photo has been widely reproduced to help keep alive the notorious Dachau "gas chamber" myth. (US Army photo SC 206194.)Besides the condensation below you can exam the various reviews of the REDCROSS covering WW2 during the time of the jews claimed astrocities commitedby the Germans.Inmates ReleasedMore than 200,000 prisoners were transferred from Auschwitz to other camps,and about 8,000 were in the camp when it was liberated by Soviet forces. Inaddition, about 1,500 prisoners who had served their sentences werereleased, and returned to their home countries. [16] If Auschwitz hadactually been a top secret extermination center, would the Germans havereleased inmates who "knew" what was happening there?Himmler Orders Death Rate Reducedhttp://www.ihr.org/books/hoggan/21.htmlhttp://www.outlawjournalism.com/news/?p=5803http://www.rense.com/general69/factua.htmhttp://www.777healthproducts.com/07g.htmhttp://www.intellnet.org/resources/resistance/holocaust/04.htm http://www.icrc.ch/Web/Eng/siteeng0.nsf/iwpList418/359CC4EF8A1E5C72C1256B66005B2171A little hard to obtain a report that is not heavily influenced by jewishpressure to includE holocaust AS THEY WOULD LIKE ALL TO SEE IT..So you will notice that holocaust is not denied just a quiet it was badetc.THE JEWS AND THE CONCENTRATION CAMPS:A FACTUAL APPRAISAL BY THE RED CROSS.There is one survey of the Jewish question in Europe during World WarTwo and the conditions of Germany's concentration camps which isalmost unique in its honesty and objectivity, the three-volume Reportof the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activitiesduring the Second World War, Geneva, 1948.This comprehensive account from an entirely neutral sourceincorporated and expanded the findings of two previous works:Documents sur l'activit� du CICR en faveur des civils d�tenus dans lescamps de concentration en Allemagne 1939-1945 (Geneva, 1946), andInter Arma Caritas: the Work of the ICRC during the Second World War(Geneva, 1947). The team of authors, headed by Fr�d�ric Siordet,explained in the opening pages of the Report that their object, in thetradition of the Red Cross, had been strict political neutrality, andherein lies its great value.The ICRC successfully applied the 1929 Geneva military convention inorder to gain access to civilian internees held in Central and WesternEurope by the Germany authorities. By contrast, the ICRC was unable togain any access to the Soviet Union, which had failed to ratify theConvention. The millions of civilian and military internees held inthe USSR, whose conditions were known to be by far the worst, werecompletely cut off from any international contact or supervision.The Red Cross Report is of value in that it first clarifies thelegitimate circumstances under which Jews were detained inconcentration camps, i.e. as enemy aliens. In describing the twocategories of civilian internees, the Report distinguishes the secondtype as "Civilians deported on administrative grounds (in German,"Schutzh�ftlinge"), who were arrested for political or racial motivesbecause their presence was considered a danger to the State or theoccupation forces" (Vol. 111, p. 73). These persons, it continues,"were placed on the same footing as persons arrested or imprisonedunder common law for security reasons." (P.74).The Report admits that the Germans were at first reluctant to permitsupervision by the Red Cross of people detained on grounds relating tosecurity, but by the latter part of 1942, the ICRC obtained importantconcessions from Germany. They were permitted to distribute foodparcels to major concentration camps in Germany from August 1942, and"from February 1943 onwards this concession was extended to all othercamps and prisons" (Vol. 111, p. 78). The ICRC soon establishedcontact with camp commandants and launched a food relief programmewhich continued to function until the last months of 1945, letters ofthanks for which came pouring in from Jewish internees.Red Cross Recipients Were JewsThe Report states that "As many as 9,000 parcels were packed daily.From the autumn of 1943 until May 1945, about 1,112,000 parcels with atotal weight of 4,500 tons were sent off to the concentration camps"(Vol. III, p. 80). In addition to food, these contained clothing andpharmaceutical supplies. "Parcels were sent to Dachau, Buchenwald,Sangerhausen, Sachsenhausen, Oranienburg, Flossenburg,Landsberg-am-Lech, Fl�ha, Ravensbr�ck, Hamburg-Neuengamme, Mauthausen,Theresienstadt, Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen, to camps near Vienna and inCentral and Southern Germany. The principal recipients were Belgians,Dutch, French, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, Poles and stateless Jews"(Vol. III, p. 83).In the course of the war, "The Committee was in a position to transferand distribute in the form of relief supplies over twenty millionSwiss francs collected by Jewish welfare organisations throughout theworld, in particular by the American Joint Distribution Committee ofNew York" (Vol. I, p. 644). This latter organisation was permitted bythe German Government to maintain offices in Berlin until the Americanentry into the war. The ICRC complained that obstruction of their vastrelief operation for Jewish internees came not from the Germans butfrom the tight Allied blockade of Europe. Most of their purchases ofrelief food were made in Rumania, Hungary and Slovakia.The ICRC had special praise for the liberal conditions which prevailedat Theresienstadt up to the time of their last visits there in April1945. This camp, "where there were about 40,000 Jews deported fromvarious countries was a relatively privileged ghetto" (Vol. III, p.75). According to the Report, "'The Committee's delegates were able tovisit the camp at Theresienstadt (Terezin) which was used exclusivelyfor Jews and was governed by special conditions. From informationgathered by the Committee, this camp had been started as an experimentby certain leaders of the Reich ... These men wished to give the Jewsthe means of setting up a communal life in a town under their ownadministration and possessing almost complete autonomy. . . twodelegates were able to visit the camp on April 6th, 1945. Theyconfirmed the favourable impression gained on the first visit" (Vol.I, p . 642).The ICRC also had praise for the regime of Ion Antonescu of FascistRumania where the Committee was able to extend special relief to183,000 Rumanian Jews until the time of the Soviet occupation. The aidthen ceased, and the ICRC complained bitterly that it never succeeded"in sending anything whatsoever to Russia" (Vol. II, p. 62). The samesituation applied to many of the German camps after their "liberation"by the Russians. The ICRC received a voluminous flow of mail fromAuschwitz until the period of the Soviet occupation, when many of theinternees were evacuated westward. But the efforts of the Red Cross tosend relief to internees remaining at Auschwitz under Soviet controlwere futile. However, food parcels continued to be sent to formerAuschwitz inmates transferred west to such camps as Buchenwald andOranienburg.No Evidence Of GenocideOne of the most important aspects of the Red Cross Report is that itclarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedly occurred inthe camps toward the end of the war. Says the Report: "In the chaoticcondition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of thewar, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimedan increasing number of victims. Itself alarmed by this situation, theGerman Government at last informed the ICRC on February 1st, 1945 ...In March 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC andGeneral of the S.S. Kaltenbrunner gave even more decisive results.Relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC, and one delegatewas authorised to stay in each camp ..." (Vol. III, p. 83).Clearly, the German authorities were at pains to relieve the diresituation as far as they were able. The Red Cross are quite explicitin stating that food supplies ceased at this time due to the Alliedbombing of German transportation, and in the interests of internedJews they had protested on March 15th, 1944 against "the barbarousaerial warfare of the Allies" (Inter Arma Caritas, p. 78). By October2nd, 1944, the ICRC warned the German Foreign Office of the impendingcollapse of the German transportation system, declaring thatstarvation conditions for people throughout Germany were becominginevitable.In dealing with this comprehensive, three-volume Report, it isimportant to stress that the delegates of the International Red Crossfound no evidence whatever at the camps in Axis occupied Europe of adeliberate policy to exterminate the Jews. In all its 1,600 pages theReport does not even mention such a thing as a gas chamber. It admitsthat Jews, like many other wartime nationalities, suffered rigours andprivations, but its complete silence on the subject of plannedextermination is ample refutation of the Six Million legend. Like theVatican representatives with whom they worked, the Red Cross founditself unable to indulge in the irresponsible charges of genocidewhich had become the order of the day. So far as the genuine mortalityrate is concerned, the Report points out that most of the Jewishdoctors from the camps were being used to combat typhus on the easternfront, so that they were unavailable when the typhus epidemics of 1945broke out in the camps (Vol. I, p. 204 ff) - Incidentally, it isfrequently claimed that mass executions were carried out in gaschambers cunningly disguised as shower facilities. Again the Reportmakes nonsense of this allegation. "Not only the washing places, butinstallations for baths, showers and laundry were inspected by thedelegates. They had often to take action to have fixtures made lessprimitive, and to get them repaired or enlarged" (Vol. III, p. 594).Not All Were InternedVolume III of the Red Cross Report, Chapter 3 (I. Jewish CivilianPopulation) deals with the "aid given to the Jewish section of thefree population," and this chapter makes it quite plain that by nomeans all of the European Jews were placed in internment camps, butremained, subject to certain restrictions, as part of the freecivilian population. This conflicts directly with the "thoroughness"of the supposed "extermination programme", and with the claim in theforged H�ss memoirs that Eichmann was obsessed with seizing "everysingle Jew he could lay his hands on."In Slovakia, for example, where Eichmann's assistant Dieter Wislicenywas in charge, the Report states that "A large proportion of theJewish minority had permission to stay in the country, and at certainperiods Slovakia was looked upon as a comparative haven of refuge forJews, especially for those coming from Poland. Those who remained inSlovakia seem to have been in comparative safety until the end ofAugust 1944, when a rising against the German forces took place. Whileit is true that the law of May 15th, 1942 had brought about theinternment of several thousand Jews, these people were held in campswhere the conditions of food and lodging were tolerable, and where theinternees were allowed to do paid work on terms almost equal to thoseof the free labour market" (Vol. I, p. 646).Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jewsavoid internment altogether, but the emigration of Jews continuedthroughout the war, generally by way of Hungary, Rumania and Turkey.Ironically, post-war Jewish emigration from German-occupiedterritories was also facilitated by the Reich, as in the case of thePolish Jews who had escaped to France before its occupation. "The Jewsfrom Poland who, whilst in France, had obtained entrance permits tothe United States were held to be American citizens by the Germanoccupying authorities, who further agreed to recognize the validity ofabout three thousand passports issued to Jews by the consulates ofSouth American countries" (Vol. I, p. 645).As future U.S. citizens, these Jews were held at the Vittel camp insouthern France for American aliens. The emigration of European Jewsfrom Hungary in particular proceeded during the war unhindered by theGerman authorities. "Until March 1944," says the. Red Cross Report,"Jews who had the privilege of visas for Palestine were free to leaveHungary" (Vol. I, p. 648). Even after the replacement of the HorthyGovernment in 1944 (following its attempted armistice with the SovietUnion) with a government more dependent on German authority, theemigration of Jews continued.The Committee secured the pledges of both Britain and the UnitedStates "to give support by every means to the emigration of Jews fromHungary," and from the U.S. Government the ICRC received a messagestating that "The Government of the United States ... now specificallyrepeats its assurance that arrangements will be made by it for thecare of all Jews who in the present circumstances are allowed toleave" (Vol. I, p . 649).Biedermann agreed that in the nineteen instances that "Did Six MillionReally Die?" quoted from the Report of the International Committee ofthe Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War and InterArma Caritas (this includes the above material), it did so accurately.A quote from Charles Biedermann (a delegate of the InternationalCommittee of the Red Cross and Director of the Red Cross'International Tracing Service) under oath at the Z�ndel Trial(February 9, 10, 11 and 12, 1988).http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=2735http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/14645862&referer=brief_results ACTUALLY -- AND CONTRARY TO HIS HIGHLY FLATTERING PUBLIC IMAGE -- THE RENOWNED "NAZI HUNTER" HAS A WELL-DOCUMENTED BUT LITTLE-KNOWN RECORD OF DECEIT, MENDACITY AND PREVARICATION. SOME HIGHLIGHTS: Wiesenthal repeatedly lied about his alleged role in locating Adolf Eichmann, was consistently wrong about Josef Mengele, and falsely accused Polish-American Frank Walus of having murdered Jews in Poland as a Gestapo official. Wiesenthal has absurdly charged that the Germans exterminated Jews in "electrocution chambers," and that they manufactured bars of soap from the bodies of murdered Jews. His deception about his own wartime activities prompted Austrian Chancellor Bruno Kreisky (himself of Jewish ancestry) to accuse the "Nazi hunter" of having collaborated with his wartime oppressors. (For details about Wiesenthal's record, see: M. Weber, "Simon Wiesenthal: Bogus Nazi Hunter," The Journal of Historical Review, Winter 1989-90.) THE CANADIAN JEWISH NEWS, Jan. 30, 1992 Wannsee's importance rejected London (JTA) - An Israeli Holocaust scholar has debunked the Wannsee Conference, at which top Nazi officials are said to have gathered at a villa in a Berlin suburb in 1942 to draw the blueprints of the "Final Solution." According to Prof. Yehuda Bauer (photo) of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Wannsee was a meeting, "but hardly a conference", and "little of what was said there was executed in detail." "The public still repeats, time after time, the silly story that at Wannsee the extermination of the Jews was arrived at." "I have never held myself out to be a Holocaust expert, nor have I written books about what is now called the Holocaust." "I have done my best to prepare the case that follows, but I respectfully submit that I do not have any duty to become an expert on the Holocaust, my Lord." "I have never claimed to be a Holocaust historian. As I have said, I have no written no book about the Holocaust. I have written no article about it. If I have spoken about it, it is usually because somebody has asked me a question, I have been questioned about it. On such occasions I have emphasised my lack of expertise and I have expatiated only upon those areas with which I am familiar." http://www.fpp.co.uk/Legal/Penguin/transcripts/day002.htm: "Now, you heard me say in my opening statement, Mr Rampton, that I am not an expert on the Holocaust. What I would now say would be a figure without any value whatsoever." "Q. [Rampton] What you do you say about Sobibor, Treblinka, Belzec and Chelmno?" "A. [Irving] Nothing at all. I am not an expert." RJ.Winston Churchill wrote a five volume history of World War II and nevermentioned the holocaust. He never mentioned it because he knew that theholocaust was just wartime propaganda and he did not want to sully what hehoped would be the definitive history of the war with propaganda that commonsense alone could refute. I could go on but the evidence I speak of isavailable to The Jubilee readers from many patriotic sources even though itis still widely censored by America's media and libraries.I once considered the battle over the holocaust as a great political trumpcard allowing us to take back the moral high ground on the censorship issuefrom the left. But I see now that it is much more important than that. Theholocaust is qualitatively different than the silly lies nations tell theircitizens to get them so fired up they will send their children to die inforeign wars. The holocaust is not pre-war propaganda. It is post-warpropaganda.Why do we need post World War II propaganda? Because World War II was thegreatest human catastrophe in two thousand years for the Aryan peoples andwe "gentiles" must not be allowed to see the truth. It was more than theslaughter of our racial kinsmen and the destruction of our racial homeland.World War II was the most significant crossroads the Christian nations havefaced since Herman faced the legions of Rome in the forests of Teutonberg2,000 years ago. But Herman won the battle of Teutonberg Wald. The Christianworld lost World War II. We lost because we came to a crossroads and wentthe wrong way.http://www.nafcash.com/Lest you think there must be some truth to the alleged Treblinka holocaust NAFCASH TM is offering a $250,000.00 REWARD For locating JUST ONE of the alleged "HUGE MASS GRAVES" of Treblinka NAFCASH TM presents THE TREBLINKA CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATION CHALLENGE TM You must scientifically - forensically prove the grave's EXACT location,its EXACT dimensions and its EXACT volumetric density. The cremated remains must total AT LEAST one percent of the alleged massmurder. JUST ONE MASS GRAVE! - JUST ONE PERCENT!http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/holohoax.htm HOW TO KEEP ACADEMICS QUIET The Real Issue Is Israel's Human Rights Record: A statement by Norman G. Finkelstein upon publication of Beyond Chutzpah Professor Alan Dershowitz of Harvard University is currently best known for his advocacy of the "most excruciating" torture against terrorist suspects such as a "needle being shoved under the fingernails." The alleged purpose of this torture is to extract a truthful confession but its real consequence, as human rights organizations have pointed out, is to produce whatever statements are necessary to end the suffering.For 15 months Dershowitz has applied a variant of this truth-seeking technique -- less physically painful but no less excruciating -- to prospective publishers of Beyond Chutzpah, which offers a critical examination of Israel's human rights record and Dershowitz's defense of it. Enlisting one of the most powerful law firms in the country after his personal initiatives proved unsuccessful, Dershowitz has repeatedly threatened to bankrupt highly respected publishers with litigation if they didn't cancel publication of my book. He could then proclaim that the cancellation confirmed the "truth" that Beyond Chutzpah didn't meet scholarly standards. Dershowitz justified these blackmail tactics on the ground that Beyond Chutzpah libels him. Yet, when I first began to expose his gross scholarly misconduct, Dershowitz publicly declared at UCLA (on 21 October 2003) that he wouldn't respond with a libel action because he believed "so strongly in the First Amendment and full freedom of speech." Ironically, just as he was threatening my publishers with expensive and time-consuming lawsuits, Dershowitz denounced Holocaust denier David Irving, who had sued Deborah Lipstadt for libel, with these words: "Before Irving lost his case [against Lipstadt], several publishers had refused to issue books critical of Irving, out of fear of his bringing expensive and time-consuming lawsuits. That was a chilling of free speech" (Afterword to Lipstadt's History on Trial; his emphasis). My publisher, University of California Press, was understandably at great pains to fend off a potential lawsuit by Dershowitz; for an academic publisher the associated costs would have been ruinous, to the point of making certain victory meaningless. On occasion our relationship became strained and at one point it appeared as if we had reached an impasse. However, through the skillful mediation of Nation magazine senior editor Roane Carey (who was the freelance editor of Beyond Chutzpah) and others, a satisfactory compromise was reached that protected the interests of both publisher and author, and, most importantly, preserved the integrity of the book. I would like personally to extend my heartfelt thanks to all who supported me and the press during this difficult period."Another Frenchman, Paul Rassinier, a pre-war communist and later asocialist, had been a member of the French Resistance. He was arrested andinterned in concentration camps, among them Buchenwald. In 1948 he publisheda book Crossing the Line, in which he argued that people might have beenkilled in concentration camps, but that the perpetrators had acted on theirown, not on orders from headquarters.AS WITH ABU GRAIB."The saving of the Jews in Europe did not figure at the head of the list ofpriorities of the ruling class. It was the foundation of the State which wasprimordial in their eyes." "The masses of Jews from Hungary's ghettos obediently boarded thedeportation trains without knowing their fate. They were full of confidence in the false information that they were being transferred toKenyermeze.The truth is that somewhere between 700,000 and 1,500,000 people died inGerman work camps in 1944 and 1945. Most of them were Jews. Many were not.Most of them died in the last six months of the war from disease and hungercaused by America's bombing of Germany and subsequent destruction of herinfrastructure. There were some atrocities but very few. Few people realizethat the International Red Cross had a field office in Auschwiz from 1942 untilthe end of the war. That office never reported or recorded any atrocities (Several years agointernational Jewry forced the Red Cross to apologize to the Jews -apologize for not seeing something that never happened.)Clearly, the German authorities were at pains to relieve the dire situationas far as they were able. The Red Cross are quite explicit in stating thatfood supplies ceased at this time due to the Allied bombing of Germantransportation, and in the interests of interned Jews they had protested onMarch 15th, 1944 against "the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies" (InterArma Caritas, p. 78). By October 2nd, 1944, the ICRC warned the GermanForeign Office of the impending collapse of the German transportationsystem, declaring that starvation conditions for people throughout Germanywere becoming inevitable.A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz-Birkenau from Hungaryin July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly gassed and cremated daily.She likewise testified after the war that she heard and saw nothing of "gaschambers" during the time she was interned there. She heard the gassingstories only later. [15]Inmates ReleasedMore than 200,000 prisoners were transferred from Auschwitz to other camps,and about 8,000 were in the camp when it was liberated by Soviet forces. Inaddition, about 1,500 prisoners who had served their sentences werereleased, and returned to their home countries. [16] If Auschwitz hadactually been a top secret extermination center, would the Germans havereleased inmates who "knew" what was happening there?Himmler Orders Death Rate Reduced http://www.ifamericansknew.org/http://www.ussliberty.org/"Asgard" <asg...@home.net wrote in messagenews:zZadnTJAIc9c0_DY...@giganews.com...� What a load of emotive old bollocks, bullshit and lies. The narrator states the inmates were "starving' at Bergen Belsen, yet the vast majority of the inmates look positively fat and shiny. He goes on to say those dead, had died of starvation, yet earlier stated they'd not eaten for only 6 days. The images of the dead showed mainly emaciated corpses, nothing like the people still moving around. If they'd died of "starvation", why had the vasst majority of the inmates not suffered the same fate. Why, indeed wasit only the corpses which were emaciated. What I found particularly intersting, was significant incidence ofpetachiae on the bodies of the dead. THIS IS A CLASSIC SIGN OF EPIDEMIC TYPHUS. The documentary was made in 2005, by a yid, and I note they're stillusing the mythical 4million figure for deaths at Auschsitz. Haven't correctedthe script. They also state, quite clearly, there were 6m jewish deaths in camps. No mention of the supposed Einzatzgroupen. The entire documentary is a farcical attempt heighten the victimhoodstatus of yids. Any of the experts like to comment? Keenan? You're an expert oneverything. Gord, likewise. McFey? Got any answers chaps? I look forward to your attempts to shoot this one down.Russian troops marched into Berlin on April 24, 1945, they found 800 Jewsalive and well in Berlin's Jewish hospital.http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/april/21/newsid_3560000/3560175.stm51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration With the Nazishttp://www.wrmea.com/archives/Sept_2004/0409086.html"Topaz" <mars...@hotmail.com wrote in messagenews:pklr449roj8r6c7uf...@4ax.com... "The orthodox holocaust story can not possibly be defended with rational arguments because its absurdity is overwhelming. We are asked to believe in the fata morgana of a vast slaughter in killing factories which left no traces whatsoever - no documents, no bones, no teeth, no ashes - nothing! We are further asked to believe that the Allies, who had a large network of informers all over Europe and a spy in the German leadership (Admiral Canaris, the head of the German intelligence), did not become aware of this gigantic genocide until the end of the war, for if they had known about the mass murder, they would have acted to stop it. Finally, we are asked to believe that the Jews in Poland, the epicentre of the holocaust, did not know anything about the Auschwitz gas chambers as late as in August 1944, otherwise the Jews from the Lodz ghetto would not have gone to Auschwitz voluntarily - which is precisely what they did, as related by Raul Hilberg in his standard work about the holocaust (Die Vernichtung der europaeischen Juden, p. 543/544). As the Zionist-controlled system of the "Western democracies" is woefully unable to counter the revisionists with arguments, it resorts to censorship and brute force in order to silence the dangerous heretics. And the Jews are gradually transforming the holocaust into a religion. This is a very clever strategy, for as Robert Faurisson aptly remarks, one cannot refute a religion with scientific arguments. Thus, the holocaust museums and holocaust monuments spreading like mushrooms all over America and Europe are really temples of the new religion, whereas professional "holocaust survivors" such as Elie Wiesel are the priests of the new religion. To prove this assertion, we only have to quote Wiesel himself: "The Holocaust is a holy mystery, the secret of which is limited to the circle of the priesthood of survivors" (Peter Novick, The Holocaust in American Life, 1999, p. 211, 212, retranslated from the German). Another high priest of the holocaust cult, Simon Wiesenthal, goes even further: "When each of us comes before the Six Million, we will be asked what we did with our lives... I will say: I did not forget you" (Simon Wiesenthal in Response, Vol. 20, Nr. 1). No critical questions about the holocaust are allowed because they are a blasphemy: They cause immense distress to the eternal victims of persecution, the Jews, and are an attempt to whitewash National Socialism - the most evil ideology of all times which made the holocaust possible! In today's Germany, it is even considered inadmissible to compare the holocaust with the atrocities of communist tyrants such as Stalin or Cambodian dictator Pol Pot because this is regarded as a "relativisation" and "trivialization" of the worst crime in history. French Zionist propagandist Claude Lanzmann, the producer of a long and unspeakably dull film about the holocaust (the title of this film is Shoa, the Hebrew word for "catastrophe", which is often used by Jews as a synonym for "holocaust") makes no effort to conceal that the holocaust cult is to replace Christianity: "If Auschwitz is something other than a horror of history, then Christianity totters in its foundations. Christ is the Son of God, who went to the end of the humanely endurable, where he endured the cruellest suffering. (...) If Auschwitz is true, then there is a human suffering with which that of Christ simply cannot be compared. (...) In this case, Christ is false, and salvation will not come from him. (...) Auschwitz is the refutation of Christ." (Les temps modernes, Paris, December 1993, p. 132, 133.) Nowadays, a large percentage of the Jews do not believe in God any more, but virtually all of them believe in the Six Million. The Zionist leadership cunningly exploits the holocaust to unite the World's Jews by keeping them in a constant state of hysteria and persecution mania, insinuating that only if the Jews stick together will they be able to ban the threat of a new holocaust. It goes without saying that very few Non-Jews are willing to embrace the murky holocaust religion. While the overwhelming majority of people in the West still believe that the official holocaust version is essentially true (even if they suspect that the figures might me somewhat inflated), they are thoroughly fed up with the eternal lamentation about Jewish victims and Jewish suffering. They simply don't want to hear it any more. In Germany, opinion polls showed that a vast majority of the population was against the planned holocaust monument in Berlin (which not a single major party, not a single leading politician and not a single big newspaper dared to oppose). Privately, the politicians are probably as profoundly disgusted with the endless holocaust litany as the rest of the population, but they cannot possibly afford to let the revisionists win because this would shatter the very foundations of the "democratic" system to which they own their careers and their wealth... The ultimate weapon against Zionism and the state of Israel At the end of the year 2000, Israel is a besieged country, but from the military point of view, it is still vastly superior to its neighbours, and it enjoys the unconditional support of the United States. Should any of the Islamic states grow strong enough to seriously threaten Israel, it would most probably be attacked and militarily annihilated by America. Russia is not likely to risk a confrontation with the USA for the sake of the Palestinians. We can certainly admire the bravery of the Palestinians resistance fighters who are willing to sacrifice their lives to liberate their homeland from the alien intruders, but realistically, they have no chance to win. The Palestinians have stones and slings. The Israelis have helicopters and tanks. You can't destroy helicopters and tanks with stones and slings. When fighting one's enemy, one should always look for his weakest spot. The weakest spot of Israel, its Achilles heel, is the holocaust lie to which it owes its existence. The revisionists can give the adversaries of Israel and international Zionism a terrible weapon. It is quite true that many revisionists are by no means guided by political considerations. Some of them - Carlo Mattogno is a good example - are only motivated by intellectual curiosity: They want to ascertain what really happened to the Jews during the Second World War. But even if revisionism is not a political movement, its political implications are tremendous. The revisionists are endeavouring to find out the truth, and truth is the deadliest enemy of Israel and international Jewry. Thus, the revisionists objectively work against Israel and Zionism, even if subjectively their goals are often purely scientific and devoid of any political ambition. This is, of course, the reason why they are persecuted and their books burnt in more and more countries. In view of the total Jewish media control and the ever-growing anti-revisionist repression in many Western countries, it is very difficult indeed to achieve a revisionist breakthrough. We revisionists are facing an uphill struggle which can only partly be explained by our total lack of financial resources. Fortunately the internet, which the Jews are unable to censure, has greatly improved our possibilities to make the results of our research known to the World, but all the same, we should not cherish naive illusions: Not every citizen of the Western world who is informed about the revisionist arguments will automatically become revisionist and anti-Zionist. The average person in the West - and particularly in Germany - has been so thoroughly brainwashed that a sudden exposure to the truth can provoke a nervous breakdown or stomach cramps. I have repeatedly witnessed this myself. Other people would gladly accept the truth about the holocaust, but as they know that even the slightest suspicion of revisionism leads to social ostracism, economic ruin and legal persecution, they understandably prefer not to get involved. However, if we want to win the war against those whom one of my Russian friends called "the enemies of God and mankind".. The logical consequence of all this is that those countries which are authentically anti-Zionist and real friends of the oppressed Palestinian people should make the breakthrough of holocaust revisionism their foremost priority. A tank costs millions of dollars, yet one soldier can destroy it with a single missile. The revisionists can provide anti-Zionist freedom fighters with a weapon not even a thousand missiles can destroy." http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/ http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.htmlWell the claim that they were fighting for a homeland might float, howeverif the are still more concerned about jewish aims and dreams than weighingthis of with the requirements of the other non jewish citizens in thecountries in which they reside, then obviously the non jewish citizens havereason to object and ignore their claims at the expense of their own wealth, lives and wellbeing.We have already paid a top price for assisting jews in their selfish selfishself centred aims.Casualties in WW2Not including the documented 5 million non Jewish in concentration campswho far out numbered the suspected true number of Jewish victims. And thisis without lies and exaggerations about non jewish cassualities.Soviet Union 25,568,000China 11,324,000Germany 7,060,000Poland 6,850,000Japan 1,806,000Yugoslavia 1,700,000Rumania 985,000France 810,000Austria 525,000Italy 410,000Great Britain 388,000USA 295,000Holland 250,000Belgium 85,000Finland 79,000Canada 42,000India 36,000Australia 29,000Albania 28,000Spain 22,000Bulgaria 21,000New Zealand 12,000Norway 10,000South Africa 9,000Luxembourg 5,000Denmark 4,000TOTAL 58,353,000The Jewish ghetto police always had the option, she said, of "throwing offtheir uniforms and joining the rest of us" - a point that Yitzak Zuckerman,a leader of the Warsaw ghetto uprising, made in his memoir.http://www.theexperiment.org/articles.php?news_id=2139Without Jewish co operation through the zionists the Germans would neverhave had the resources to herd the Jews into the various camps. And thezionists made it impossible for the underground to trust the jews.Like elsewhere, the only people who had the information and the ear of thefrightened Jewish population were the Judenrat. In this case the Judenratcomprised mainly the Zionist Federation members. Without their help the SS,with 19 officers and less than 90 men, plus a few hundred Hungarian police,could not have collected and controlled a million Jews, when they did noteven know their whereabouts.So no reluctance amongst jews as they knew that they were simply beingencamped._____________________________________THE PROBLEM BEING THAT THE ONLY WILD AND WEIRD ACCOUNTS OF UNTRAMMELLEDHORROR CAME FROM ONLY JEWS.NON JEWS COMPLETELY CONTRADICTED THE WILD STORIES FROM THE CONTRACTINGMUSCLES TO THE SOAP AND TATTOOED LAMPSHADES, ALL BS.During World WarII, Rassinier was a highly decorated member of the FrenchResistance. In October of 1943 he was arrested by the Gestapo for variousactivities including the smuggling of Jewish refugees over the Franco-Swissborder took 2 years to publish his book because of persistent resistanceby the jewish clique.http://www.ihr.org/books/rassinier/debunking1-0.htmlhttp://www.ihr.org/books/hoggan/A4.htmlhttp://www.fpp.co.uk/bookchapters/articles/HowWarsBegin.htmlhttp://www.anti-rev.org/textes/VidalNaquet92a/part-6.htmlhttp://www.alibris.com/search/books/author/Paul_RassinierBut the huge money involved in the reparations won out and we have anothertrue report labeled as a revision against the lies that were spread andapparently plenty of jewish and jewish supporters willing to jump on thebandwagon and build up the stories, supply all sorts of shonky evidence tosupport the lies.And of course the jewish money made it very iffy for experts to testifybecause of the constant arttacks , false ads on the net. in books and byevery jew and his mother of all ages whose chances of being either witnessesof involved were/are slimmer but apparently the courts i n Germany also helpthe cause of falsifying evidence.Although even honest jews could not sway the lies and Finklestein likeRassinier, Harry Elmer Barnes(http://www.amazon.com/Perpetual-Peace-Harry-Elmer-Barnes/dp/0939484013http://www.courts.fsnet.co.uk/harryelmerbarnes.htm and of course you willfind the jewish supporters here labelling him as a revisionist because hedid not agree with their versionhttp://www.revisionists.com/revisionists/barnes.htmlhttp://tmh.floonet.net/articles/barnes.html ), Charles A. Beard(http://www.questia.com/read/6153679?title=Cross%20Currents%20in%20Europe%20To-Dayhttp://www.questia.com/SM.qst ) , Herman Hesse(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Complete_Fairy_Tales_of_Hermann_Hesse ) confession is from Hoess. Here are the details: "In the introduction to Death Dealer [Buffalo: Prometheus, 1992], the historian Steven Paskuly wrote: "Just after his capture in 1946, the British Security Police were able to extract a statement from Hoess by beating him and filling him with liquor." Paskuly was reiterating what Rupert Butler and Bernard Clarke had already described. In 1983, Rupert Butler published an unabashed memoir (Legions of Death, Hamlyn: London) describing in graphic detail how, over three days, he and Clarke and other British policemen managed to torture Hoess into making a "coherent statement." According to Butler [Legions of Death, p. 237], he and the other interrogators put the boots to Hoess the moment he was captured. For starters, Clarke struck his face four times to get H�ess to reveal his true identity. <quote The admission suddenly unleashed the loathing of Jewish sergeants in the arresting party whose parents had died in Auschwitz following an order signed by H�ss. The prisoner was torn from the top bunk, the pajamas ripped from his body. He was then dragged naked to one of the slaughter tables, where it seemed to Clarke the blows and screams were endless. Eventually, the Medical Officer urged the Captain: "Call them off, unless you want to take back a corpse." A blanket was thrown over H�ss and he was dragged to Clarke's car, where the sergeant poured a substantial slug of whisky down his throat. H�ss tried to sleep. Clarke thrust his service stick under the man's eyelids and ordered in Geffnan: "Keep your pig eyes open, you swine." For the first time H�ss trotted out his oft-repeated justification: "I took my orders from Himmler. I was a soldier in the same way as you are a soldier and we had to obey orders." The party arrived back at Heide around three in the morning. The snow was swirling still, but the blanket was torn from H�ss and he was made to walk completely nude through the prison yard to his cell. </quote An article in the British newspaper Wrexham Leader [Mike Mason, "In a cell with a Nazi war criminal-We kept him awake until he confessed," October 17, 1986] following the airing of a TV documentary on the case of Rudolf Hoess included eyewitness recollections by Ken Jones: <quote Mr. Ken Jones was then a private with the Fifth Royal Horse Artillery stationed at Heid[e] in Schleswig-Holstein. "They brought him to us when he refused to cooperate over questioning about his activities during the war. He came in the winter of 1945/6 and was put in a small jail cell in the barracks," recalls Mr. Jones. Two other soldiers were detailed with Mr. Jones to join H�ss in his cell to help break him down for interrogation. "We sat in the cell with him, night and day, armed with axe handles. Our job was to prod him every time he fell asleep to help break down his resistance," said Mr. Jones. When H�ss was taken out for exercise he was made to wear only jeans and a cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three days and nights without sleep, H�ss finally broke down and made a full confession to the authorities. </quote The confession Hoess signed was numbered document NO-1210; later revamped, as document PS-3868, which became the basis for an oral deposition Hoess made for the IMT on April 15, 1946, a month after it had been extracted from him by torture... Since what people confess to after they have been captured by the Communists and their liberal comrades is not proof of anything, this leaves only the stories of survivors. These contradict each other and not believable. One professional survivor said that he could tell if the Germans were gassing German Jews or Polish Jews by the color of the smoke. The fact that there are so many "survivors" is not proof of an extermination plan. There may be six million survivors. Just about every Jew that is old says he is a survivor.Frederick Bausman (http://www.thenation.com/archive/detail/13677001 ) allthe honest teachers and historians were labelled nazi , which of course theywerent, but if you point out the lies the only support you are going to getis from anti semitic groups.And of course there is the decent honest jew tired of the lies.A statement by Norman G. Finkelstein upon publication of Beyond Chutzpahhttp://www.nowar-paix.ca/nowar/forum/6973http://666ismoney.com/HolocaustAds.htmlI, Raquel Baranow am a Grad Student of Holocaust Denial. There are personswith PhD's in various fields whoalso deny the 6 million canard. The best evidence is forensic. Untilrecently, there was never a forensicexamination of the alleged murder weapon (gas chambers). Demographic figuresare incomplete. After the fallof East Europe to communism, many of the millions of Jews who fled Polandinto the Soviet Union or ended upbehind the Iron Curtain changed their names to assimilate, many civiliansdied in the war, many died in theconcentration camps of louse-born typhus. During World War One, two millioncivilians in the Soviet Union diedof typhus. Many died in Stalin's gulags.Yad Vashem,( http://www.yadvashem.org/wps/portal/IY_HON_Welcome)a HolocaustDocumentation Center in Israel has a database of 3,000,000 alleged victimsof Naziextermination. But as you can see HERE(http://666ismoney.com/YadVashem.html) (my maiden name, Friedemann), nearlyevery name is listed at leasttwice, some as many as five times!http://www.yadvashem.org/lwp/workplace/IY_HON_WelcomeYad Vashem's 3,000,000 "Holocaust victims" database lists nearlyeveryone twice. Some as many at five times. Anyone, includingyou can submit a "Page of Testimony".And of course we have lists duplicated, unconfirmed, but 3m according to ourusual jewish/Zionist sources.Put your name in, you might be missing out on reparations.Has been improvements since this, numbers still very dicey.Name Town District RegionCountry Bday SourceFriedemann Adolf Berlin Berlin Berlin Germany1879 list of victims from GermanyFriedemann Adolf Berlin Berlin Berlin Germany1879 list of deportation from BerlinFriedemann Adolf Berlin Berlin Berlin Germany1905 list of deportation from BerlinIt is forensically impractical or impossible to exterminate millions withlouse disinfestant (hydrogen cyanide gas)or diesel exhaust as alleged by malicious "witnesses" or torturedconfessors. There are no written orders forextermination. Aerial reconnaissance photographs of the concentration campsshow no smoke and flamesbelching from the crematoria and pyres as alleged. The photos and recordsshow there was not enough coke orcrematoria to cremate millions of corpses. The "witnesses" and confessorslied about how many minutes it takesto cremate a corpse. Diesel exhaust does not contain significant amount ofcarbon monoxide to kill a human. Ifthe Nazis wanted to kill millions they could have driven the coal firedtrain into a tunnel or quonset hut and gassed'em with the exhaust from the locomotive or used the exhaust from thecrematoria. At Auschwitz, during a typhusepidemic, up to 300 people died per day, hence the crematoria, shaving ofheads and requisitions for tons ofZyklon B louse disinfestant. HCN is a very dangerous, impractical, messymethod for extermination.http://www.vho.org/The Holocaust Controversy A Case for open DebateThe Gas Chambers are a fraud, a tourist attraction, slander, demonizing,impractical/impossible, maliciousatrocity propaganda spread by the communists, who hated Hitler andperpetrated by Jews, who were alwayslooking for ways to get to the lands of milk and money. The Jews haveextorted billions from the US Treasury,Germany, Swiss banks and insurance companies on account of the Holohoaxfraud. The Holohoax also makesthose who fought Hitler feel like they did something good fighting thedemon, Hitler instead of letting Hitler takeon Stalin alone.A "liberal" person has an open mind. A bigot is irrational and obstinate.And then we have the honest red cross with no ulterior motives.The New Blasphemyby Tom BlairNews Editor, The JubileeThere was a time when a man did not blaspheme God in America. There weresevere social proscriptions against it. Some communities even had lawsagainst blasphemy. Well blasphemy is still a great sin in America and maysoon be a crime again. But sadly America has a new god and so, a newblasphemy.Let me here commit the new blasphemy while it is still legal. What we knowas the "holocaust" is largely war-time propaganda. Propaganda that, unlikemost war-time propaganda, was not quietly forgotten. Instead it hascontinued; grown more fantastic, more hateful, and more dangerous toquestion every year since 1945.The truth is that somewhere between 700,000 and 1,500,000 people died inGerman work camps in 1944 and 1945. Most of them were Jews. Many were not.Most of them died in the last six months of the war from disease and hungercaused by America's bombing of Germany and subsequent destruction of herinfrastructure. There were some atrocities but very few. Few people realizethat the International Red Cross had a field office in Auschwiz from 1942until the end of the war. That office never reported or recorded anyatrocities (Several years ago international Jewry forced the Red Cross toapologize to the Jews - apologize for not seeing something that neverhappened.)� WARNING To People in Austria; Belgium; France; Germany; Israel; Spain and Switzerland. You can be fined, imprisoned or both for discussing the topics set forth in this article.It was only after I moved to the Los Angeles area several years ago that Irealized that many people were not aware that millions of victims of theHolocaust were NOT Jewish. Outside the Polish community, I heard very littlemention about the five million non-Jewish victims -- usually referred to as"the othersSubject: Israeli rabbi backs Jewish suicide attacks Organization: Copyright1997 by Reuters Lines: 43 Date: Tue, 8 Apr 1997 9:22:44 PDT Kidnappings, Beatings, Murders and HangingsAttacks by the Irgun and Stern Gang - In 1944, with the end the war insight, Irgun, now under the leadership of Menachem Begin , the future PrimeMinister of Israel 1977-83, began to attack the British administration inPalestine, starting with bomb attacks on the immigration offices, taxoffices and police stations. http://www.britains-smallwars.com/Palestine/kidnap.htmThe Americans were strongly pro Jewish and very anti British. One Hollywoodmotion picture Mogul declared in the British press that he had a holiday inhis heart every time a British soldier was killed in Palestine. and largesections of the American media echoed this sentiment.November 27 -Eight British soldiers killed in bomb attack on police station Jerusalem,Palestine, in Jewish Irgun terrorist attack.http://www.cdiss.org/terror_1940s.htmJuly 22 - Ninety people killed and forty five wounded after Jewishterrorists blow up the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, Palestine, which washome to British government and military offices. The terrorists held workersat pistol point while they planted the explosives in the basement of thehotel.July 12 - Jewish Irgun terrorists kidnap and then hang two British Armysergeants. The terrorists were trying to secure the release of three Irgunmembers who had been sentenced to death by the British authorities inPalestine.September 29 - Jewish Irgun terrorists bomb police station in Haifa,Palestine, killing four British and four Arab policemen, as well as two Arabcivilians. Forty six people injured.http://forum.cari.com.my/archiver/?tid-117974.htmlDecember 4, 1948New Palestine PartyVisit of Menachem Begin and Aims of Political Movement DiscussedTO THE EDITORS OF THE NEW YORK TIMES:Among the most disturbing political phenomena of our times is the emergencein the newly created state of Israel of the "Freedom Party" (Tnuat Haherut),a political party closely akin in its organization, methods, politicalphilosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties. It was formedout of the membership and following of the former Irgun Zvai Leumi, aterrorist, right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine.Attack on Arab VillageA shocking example was their behavior in the Arab village of Deir Yassin.This village, off the main roads and surrounded by Jewish lands, had takenno part in the war, and had even fought off Arab bands who wanted to use thevillage as their base. On April 9 (THE NEW YORK TIMES), terrorist bandsattacked this peaceful village, which was not a military objective in thefighting, killed most of its inhabitants - 240 men, women, and children -and kept a few of them alive to parade as captives through the streets ofJerusalem. Most of the Jewish community was horrified at the deed, and theJewish Agency sent a telegram of apology to King Abdullah of Trans-Jordan.But the terrorists, far from being ashamed of their act, were proud of thismassacre, publicized it widely, and invited all the foreign correspondentspresent in the country to view the heaped corpses and the general havoc atDeir Yassin.The Deir Yassin incident exemplifies the character and actions of theFreedom Party. (signed)Isidore Abramowitz, Hannah Arendt, Abraham Brick, Rabbi Jessurun Cardozo,Albert Einstein, Herman Eisen, M.D., Hayim Fineman, M. Gallen, M.D., H.H.Harris, Zelig S. Harris, Sidney Hook, Fred Karush, Bruria Kaufman, Irma L.Lindheim, Nachman Maisel, Symour Melman, Myer D. Mendelson, M.D., Harry M.Orlinsky, Samuel Pitlick, Fritz Rohrlich, Louis P. Rocker, Ruth Sager,Itzhak Sankowsky, I.J. Schoenberg, Samuel Shuman, M. Znger, Irma Wolpe,Stefan WolpeNew York, Dec. 2, 1948[/quote]http://comment.independent.co.uk/commentators/article1197235.ece"B.H. Cramer" <benj...@yourservice.com wrote in messagenews:4MKdnSvnVuD_lmrV...@giganews.com... "Jason P" <jas...@REMOVE.gmail.com wrote in message news:xY6dndIdJenal2rV...@earthlink.com... "B.H. Cramer" <benj...@yourservice.com wrote in message news:fvmdnZT_ff_ILmnV...@giganews.com... NEVER FORGET: "Deborah Lipstadt, author of the anti-revisionistpolemic Denying the Holocaust, has assigned [Binjamin Wilkormiski's book] Fragments in her Emory University class on Holocaust memoirs. When confrontedwith evidence that it is a fraud [the author spent the war in comfort in Switzerland, not Auschwitz, and was not even a Jew], she commentedthat the new revelations 'might complicate matters somewhat, but [the work] is still powerful.'" - In other words, who cares about fact or fiction where the Holocaustis concerned? And she had the classic Jew audacity to discredit David Irving, andthen make news about it, going on TV with her Jewtardian anti-revisionismsound bites. Jason P Lipstadt is a disgusting, ugly, lying jewess, who is a tad smarter than cohen. Here's some questions put to the slag which she has never acknowledged. Questions for Lipstadt WE ARE often asked for questions to put to Professor Lipstadt in her well-funded peregrinations around the world. ________________________________________ . . . here are just a few: 1. Prof. Lipstadt - why were you afraid to go into the witness box and expose yourself even to the questioning of an amateur like Mr. Irving?You effectively pleaded the Fifth Amendment, which is the traditional routeof those with something to hide. (Mr. Irving subjected himself voluntarilyto three weeks' cross examination by one of the world's leading triallawyers, and he voluntarily made available to you his entire private and public papers.) 2. are you aware that one of your main researchers, Dr. David Cesarani,said that Mr. Irving gave the defence some scary moments, particularly whentheir chief expert witness on the architecture of Auschwitz, Prof. Van Pelt, proved unable to explain what had happened to the bodies (i.e. thelogistics of disposing, for example, of 450,000 Hungarian Jews' bodies in three weeks - around 50,000 tons of corpses, by a small Sonderkommando in one crematory building) [Internet link: see http://www.fpp.co.uk/docs/trial3/DieZeit120400e.html] 3. why did you not accept David Irving's challenge, made three times publicly in the courtroom, that he would halt the case in mid-trial ifyou could find any evidence of the holes in the roof slab of Crematorium IIat Auschwitz - which still exists - through which "eye witnesses" in the payof war-crimes prosecution teams claimed to have seen SS officers tipping the Zyklon B granules? Your own chief witness Van Pelt said there are no such holes in the slab, so somebody lied, right? 4. why are you afraid of free debate? You have said there is no debate,but when push came to shove your highly paid Queen's Counsel felt itnecessary to fill the courtroom every day for three months with over thirtylawyers, counsel, barristers, assistants, historians, and researchers, just tostand up against Mr. Irving, who appeared in court alone. Was your case really that weak? 5. why have you and your friends done all you can to muzzle Mr. Irving -by putting pressure on publishers, broadcasters, television companies, and governments not to allow him to speak or to publish his widelyacknowledged books? What are you scared of? 6. in a trial which was about a very serious matter, why did you instruct your counsel to resort to smear tactics, branding Mr. Irving as an anti-Semite and a racist (although he, unlike your Counsel, frequently employs ethnic minorities as his personal staff), and although neither allegation was made in your book or pleaded in your initial Defence? Were you frightened of fighting the case on the facts of history? 7. how much money have you made out of this trial (articles, speakingfees, etc.) already? That's what it's about, isn't it - money? 8. do you think it right that your lawyers paid some of your so called "neutral" expert witnesses a quarter of a million dollars in inducementsto testify in your favour? Those six million dollars put up by Steven Spielberg - you are a religious scholar: Have you never heard the Biblesay, "Good wine needs no bush"? If your case is rock solid why was so muchmoney swilling around that London courtroom? [Internet link: http://www.fpp.co.uk/Legal/Penguin/experts/payments.html] 9. a new Zealand academic tribunal has just found that Prof. RichardEvans, your chief witness, was guilty of grossly distorting, misquoting, exaggerating, and polemicizing in his similar "expert report" on Dr. Joel Hayward, and totally lacking in the objectivity that is expected by acourt of an expert witness. How do you feel about Evans now? [Internet link: http://www.fpp.co.uk/Legal/Penguin/experts/Evans/NZReportExtract.html] 10. have you read Norman Finkelstein's book, The Holocaust Industry. Ishe a racist and anti-Semite too? 11. you have argued in your books and articles that Jews should neverstoop to marrying outside their religion and race. Is that not racism in its purest and most evil form? 12. who paid your own multi-million dollar legal expenses, and why didthe British High Court, unusually, not allow you to reclaim them? 13. Judge Gray found in his Judgment that three of the statements youmade in your book against Mr Irving are in fact serious lies just as heclaimed (the Stockholm terrorist conference, the Hitler painting "above hisdesk", the stealing or damaging of the Goebbels diaries from the Moscowarchives. Have you removed them from the book's latest editions?) (Answer: You have not).What fraud? Stop trying to divert attention from whats important here. Also,how has David Irving got anything to do w/ 'reactivating the Nazi Party'?He's a historian - also used to be a very famous one too, until he realisedthe truth & stopped writing about the 'Holocaust', THAT was his crime. Ialso believed in it until I started looking at all these reports. Q: Ifthere was a 100% certainty it never happened, what evidence would stop youbelieving? A : NONE while you accept the staus quo.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_dQz86Ve8whttp://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=102884http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtCJtbSMiDw&feature=relatedhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3JI-axaRF4&feature=relatedGUTLESS WONDERS TAKE A LOOK AT SOME REAL GUTSY PEOPLE WHO ARENT ON THEIRKBEES AS SOON AS YOU MENTION JEW.the killing of Rachel Corrie a non Jewish American who was killed by the IDFby being run down by a bulldozer,and the driver then driving past the grieving peace vo;unteers with a smirkon his face.And apparently Christian america along with Christian Americans have not hada word to say.Just compare the difference below. http://www.thenausea.com/elements/thenotforgotten/rachel/index.html http://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/16/rafah.death/ One guy gets 10 years, the other gets a raise and promotion?? For killinga non jewish american? And gets to smirk about it?JEWS CANNOT DO ENOUGH FOR AN AMERICAN JEW? WOULD U SAY JEWS ARE USING NONJEWISH AMERICANS.http://www.jonathanpollard.org/1993/051693.htmCompounding the duplicity swirling around the case was the jurors'remarkable verdict: Mr. Nelson was indeed guilty of depriving his victim ofhis civil rights by stabbing him - but not by killing him. Thus, instead ofa possible life sentence, the murderer, with credit for time served, may bea free man in a matter of months.http://www.jlaw.com/Commentary/3dayriot.htmlIt is thus with intense interest that we watch as a federal jury in Brooklynhears the case of United States vs. Lemrick Nelson, Jr. and Charles Price --respectively, the accused killer of Yankel Rosenbaum, and the man chargedwith inciting the mob that pursued Rosenbaum. As Coalition goes to press,the trial has finally begun and the prosecution is presenting powerfulevidence against the two defendants http://www.thenausea.com/elements/thenotforgotten/rachel/index.html http://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/16/rafah.death/HOW ABOUT YOU BETRAYING THE USA AND IT'S ALLIES?????HOW ABOUT YOUR SHIPMATES 0- SORRY GOOD EHOUGH?http://www.ussliberty.com/challenge.htm - $10,000 challenge - The LibertyVeterans Association offers a $10,000 reward to anyone who can establish thetruth of A. Jay Cristol's claim: 1http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig/margolis12.htmlAt 0800 hrs, 8 June, 1967, eight Israeli recon flights flew over 'Liberty,'which was flying a large American flag. At 1400 hrs, waves of low-flyingIsraeli Mystere and Mirage-III fighter-bombers repeatedly attacked theAmerican vessel with rockets, napalm, and cannon. The air attacks lasted 20minutes, concentrating on the ship's electronic antennas and dishes. The'Liberty' was left afire, listing sharply. Eight of her crew lay dead, ahundred seriously wounded, including the captain, Commander WilliamMcGonagle.http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/sh-usn/usnsh-l/agtr5.htmOn the afternoon of 8 June 1967, while in international waters off the SinaiPeninsula, Liberty, though clearly marked as a U.S. Navy ship, was struck byIsraeli aircraft. After suffering damage and many personnel casualties fromgunfire, rockets and bombs, she was further attacked by three Israeli Navymotor torpedo boats. One torpedo hit her on the starboard side, forward ofthe superstructure, opening a large hole in her hull. In all, thirty-fourmen were killed in the attacks and nearly 170 wounded. Israel subsequentlyapologized for the incident, explaining that its air and naval forces hadmistaken the Liberty for a much smaller Egyptian Navy ship.December 12 - Twenty Arabs, five Jews and two British soldiers killed andthirty wounded in Jewish terrorist bomb attacks on buses in Haifa andRamleh, Palestine. British mandate to rule Palestine ends on 15 May 1948;state of Israel established.December 29 - Jewish Irgun terrorists throw grenades from passing taxi intocaf� near the Damascus gate, Jerusalem, Palestine, killing eleven Arabs andtwo British policemen.March 11Headquarters of the Jewish Agency, Jerusalem, Palestine, destroyed by Arabcar bomb killing thirteen and injuring eighty four.April 9Jewish Irgun terrorist group attacks Deir Yassim, Palestine, murdering twohundred and fifty four Arab women and children captured in the remains ofthe village.JEWS APPEAR TO BE THE ONLY ONES WITH VOICES, WHAT HAS HPPENED TO THEPREVIOUSLY VOCIFEROUS WASPS, and other religious and non religious groups.ONE JEWISH HOLLYWOOD MOTION PICTURE MOGULThe the Jewish controlled American media proclaimed Americans were stronglypro Jewish and very anti British. One Hollywood motion picture Moguldeclared in the British press that he had a holiday in his heart every timea British soldier was killed in Palestine. and large sections of theAmerican media echoed this sentiment.http://hnn.us/articles/832.html"The Palestinians are fighting with human suicide bombers, that's all theyhave. The Israelis . . . they've got one of the most powerful militarymachines in the world. The Palestinians have nothing."-- Ted Turner, Founder of CNN"I do not think that in his heart an Israeli would deny that, if your enemyhas taken land that is rightfully yours and occupied it, then not just yourenemy's army but his wife and son and daughter and servants and all who,under his protection, come to live and make their living on the stolen land,are aggressors. By their presence they aid and abet the occupation."-- Matthew Parris, Saturday Times of London, June 22, 2002"David Ben-Gurion never moved against the Irgun and the Stern Gang untilafter the state was established and secured, which is definitely not true inthe case of the Palestinian Authority. Essentially, the Israelis are askingthe Palestinians to do something they themselves refused to do." i-- Hussein Ibish, Communication director of the American ArabAnti-Discrimination Committeehttp://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/mufti.html Zionist Jewish supremacists really hate this kind of article, that is why"Hate Crimes" exist. To protect the highest criminals.Is this Politically Correct??[The very creation of Israel required an act of terror. In 1948, most of thenon-Jewish indigenous people were ethnically cleansed from the part ofPalestine which became Israel. This action was carefully planned. Withoutit, no state with a Jewish majority and character would have been possible.Since 1948, the "Israeli Arabs", those Palestinians who avoided expulsion,have suffered continuous discrimination. Indeed, many have been internallydisplaced, ostensibly for "security reasons", but really to acquire theirlands for Jews.]No, the Zionofreaks want to ban any history but what they write.Isn't it quite glaringly obvious that "The Holocaust" legends would fallapart without laws that make it illegal to question it?Isn't it glaringly obvious that 911 was the "Goy Holocaust" for America,that short circuits critical thinking and creates a victim mentallity thatjustifies all sorts of crimes against "evil"?But with a public that thinks it is persecuted and under attack, anyatrocity is justified.The terrorists have won. For now.
B J Foster
> "Ruud66" <ruu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:4afadf40$0$1644$703f...@textnews.kpn.nl...
>> "mose" <mo...@capp.com> wrote in message
>> news:uyxKm.54009$ze1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>>> WELL APPARENTLY THERE IS NO ONE TO TURN TO IF YOU DONT LIKE JEWISH
>>> DOMINATION OF WHAT IS GOING ON IN THE WORLD AND ISRAEL IN OUR NAME AND
>>> WITH OUR MONEY.
Look at how those Jooz are taking over the Middle east eh?
http://www.seraphicpress.com/images/state07.jpg
>> This such old bogus that it aint funny again.
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion
>>
>> Get over yourself, Every muslim terrorist carries this around in a
>> translated version.
>>
>> R
>>
> ONLY PUT IT THERE FOR REFERENCE OF ANOTHER STRANGE CLAIM THAT WAS PROVED TO
> BE A FAKE BY A DYING MAN???
mose
"B J Foster" <bjfo...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote in message
> mose wrote:
>> "Ruud66" <ruu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:4afadf40$0$1644$703f...@textnews.kpn.nl...
>>> "mose" <mo...@capp.com> wrote in message
>>> news:uyxKm.54009$ze1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> ...
>>>> WELL APPARENTLY THERE IS NO ONE TO TURN TO IF YOU DONT LIKE JEWISH
>>>> DOMINATION OF WHAT IS GOING ON IN THE WORLD AND ISRAEL IN OUR NAME AND
>>>> WITH OUR MONEY.
>
MY COUNTRY WITH YOUR LIES.
> Look at how those Jooz are taking over the Middle east eh?
> http://www.seraphicpress.com/images/state07.jpg
>
>>> This such old bogus that it aint funny again.
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion
>>>
>>> Get over yourself, Every muslim terrorist carries this around in a
>>> translated version.
AND IF EVERY NON JEW VISITED THE SITE THEY MIGHT BE SURPRISED HOW THIS FAKE
DOCUMENT DESCRIBES THE SITUATION SO ACCURATELY.
OF BY THE WAY WASNT IT ER JEWS AHO DISCOVERED THE DYING MAN EHO SOLVED THE
MYSTERYU?
YEAH I'D LIE ABOUT THE PROTOCOLS IF I WAS DYING AND I WAS OFFERED ENOUGH
MONEY FOR MY FAMILY.
AND OH THE TERRORISTS , WE KNOW WHAT STARTED THAT JUST NOT TAKEN IN BY POLS
BS, HOWEVER WELL THEY ARE PAID.
>>>
>>> R
>>>
>> ONLY PUT IT THERE FOR REFERENCE OF ANOTHER STRANGE CLAIM THAT WAS PROVED
>> TO BE A FAKE BY A DYING MAN???
>
> http://www.nazimorons.dont/want/to/get/the/message/
BROUHGT OUT THE OLD NAZI BIT , WELL IF CALLING A JEWISH ARSEHOLE AN ARSEHOLE
THEN I'M A NAZIS.
THOUGH REALLY YOU SICK CRAZIES KILLING AND MURDERING ,, AND YOUR SHITTY
CLUBHAS PUSHED INTO MY GOVERNMENT AND I SEE DECENT DEMOCRATIC COUNTRIES
ACTUALLY SUPPORTING THE SUPPRESSION OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
AND THEN OF COURSE YOU ACT LIKE A BUNCH OF SICKOS SO YES I'D LIKE TO SEE YOU
SICKOS MADE TO BE DECENT AND LIVE WITH THE PEOPLE AROUND.
AND YOUR MONSTROUS LIES , WHAT A LOAD OF CRAP YOU ARE CONSTANTLY TRYING TO
SHOVE DOWN DECENT PEOPLES THROAT.
THIS ABSOLUTE SHIT OF A PERSON JUST SITS UP HERE POSTING FOR THE DISGUSTENG
NAZI FILTH BACK IN ISRAEL ON A BUNCH OF LIES SO I LIKE SHOWING YOU UP FOR
THE STINKING FRAUD YOU ARE .
AND I FIND IT PARTICULARLY ITRRITATING THAT THE USLESS POLS WE VOTE IN HAVE
NOTE DONE SOMETHING TO UNMASK YOU INSTEAD OF ALLOWING OLD TEACHERS JUST
DOING THEIR JOB BEING BEATEN UP AND JAILED JUST TO SATISFY A BUNCH OF LIARS.
THESE PEOPLE REALLY SUFFERED - NOT FAT LYING JEWS , JUST ORDINARY PEOPLE
THAT THE WAR ROLLED OVER.
SEE IF YOU CAN MUSTER UP A BIT OF SYMPATHY FOR THESE UNCOMPLAINING
CHRISTIANS AND NON JEWS. AND LEAVE THE WHINING JEWS WITH THEIR FAIRY STORIES
ABOUT BEING GASSED AND HOW MUCH THEY LOST.
BESIDES THE CAMPS DONT FORGET THE WAR ROLLED OVER AND WAS FOUGHT IN THE
EUROPEANS HOMES, CHILDREN AND BABIES, AND CAREERS.
AND THESE SELFISH JEWS TRIED TO TAKE PRIDE OF PLACE (
http://www.scrapbookpages.com/Poland/Crosses/Crosses.html )BY JUST STUPID
LIES SO APPARENT THAT ANY ONE SOON FOUND WHAT A FRAUD IT WAS.SO THEY HAD TO
SUPPRESS FREE SPEECH BY JAILING ANYONE WHO WAS A HISTORIAN AND SAW THROUGH
THE FRAUD STARIGHT AWAY.
SO ALL YOU NON JEWS SUPPORTING THESE LAWS AND THE JEWS BETTER TAKE A GOOD
LING LOOK AT WHAT AND WHO THEY ARE SUPPORTING.
Non-Jewish Wartime camps
http://www.foitimes.com/internment/
http://www.foitimes.com/internment/Stories.htm
AND TURN YOUR SYMPATHY TO WHERE IT PROPERLY BELONGS INSTEAD OF BEING TAKEN
IN BY LIARS.
DO IT IN THE WINTER AND STICK IN A STACK OF EM PLUS THE TALMUDS. MAKE A
GREAT BLAZE. DO GREAT FOR BARBYS TO.
GIVES THE PORK A BIT OF EDGE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UY-ZrwFwLQg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_kv11fRvcM&feature=response_watch
HERE FRAUD IS WHAT DECENT PEOPLE , UNBIASED, NOT SLOBBERING OVER THE
THOUGHT OF HUGE REPARATIONS .
THE RED CROSS WAS THERE RIGHT THROUGH THE WAR, NON POLITICAL, NOT AFTER
MONEY, WELL THEY WERENT JEWISH OR WE WOULD HAVE HAD ANOTHER MOB WHINING
ABOUT HOW HARD THEY HAD IT.
NAFCASH TM presents
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/holohoax.htm
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article21878.htm
http://NEOCONZIONISTTHREAT.COM)
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/holohoax.htm
http://globalfire.tv/nj/03en/letters/2003oct_nbr01.htm
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/print.asp?ID=2735
http://www.rense.com/general69/factua.htm
http://www.von-waldenburg.com/reviews.html
http://www.icrc.org/Web/Eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/57JNX3
--
+
http://music.download.com/johnnyasia
+
http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecwar.html
� http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/ds9.htm
� http://www.rense.com/general45/zzo.htm
� http://www.heretical.com/mkilliam/wwii.html
Libraries, brothels, swimming??IN AUSWICHTZ???
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4138523842550891901#0h53m09s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dyBMuSYLGk
http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/history/zionism/news.php?q=1196891581
http://www.curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=888061
http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/1966
http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/130513
http://www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/htmlall/section_second_world_war?OpenDocumenthttp://www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/68zeb2?opendocumenthttp://www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/6ayg86Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activitiesduring the Second World War, Geneva, 1948.You will find thousands of jewish funded museums amd so calleduniversitiesthat supposedly have evidence , also the reports themselves havebeen contaminated by jewish academics and supporters continual injectionsthat the Red Cross did not see.The Red Cross is not political or historical so keptrecords of it's actions,and if astrocities occurred they recorded them just as they do today.And the only evidence offered by holocaust supporters is the usual suspectexaggerations from reparation seeking jews castigated by honest honest jewsfor this horrible use of what suffering there was during this period.Despite the suffering of the jews it was not as much as Europeans as a wholesuffered with over 5 million imprisoned, a much hight number than the realnumber of jews . And free for anyone to investigate without fear ofimprisonment.Not to mention the disrupted lives of Europeans when their homes and townsbecame the battlefields of WW2.To emphasize the determined efforts of the jews to stay in the limelight bypushing all other victims to the back while they bask in the limelight , ina lot of cases undeservedly so. http://www.scrapbookpages.com/Poland/Crosses/Crosses.htmlAs an example the Polish who is the one country who had more (3 million -figures you can examine without fear of harassment) wanted to put up crossesfor victims , who were in there mostly for helping and supporting jews inPoland. Were castigated and criticised by jewish groups claiming theremembrances should only be for their victims, and not be over shadowed byChristian victims.http://www.scrapbookpages.com/Poland/Crosses/Crosses.htmlhttp://www.holocaustforgotten.com/poland.htmhttp://www.holocaustforgotten.com/All that comes out clearly, whatever the reason that the jews were held incamps, there was great co operation by the jews themselves, this forced themto find excuses for their behavior, and easiest was lying about thecruelties of the Germans that caused this co operation. Rather falls downwhen there is no gassing and if camps were simply holding camps.As their own leaders said.The Jewish ghetto police always had the option, she said, of "throwing offtheir uniforms and joining the rest of us" - a point that Yitzak Zuckerman,a leader of the Warsaw ghetto uprising, made in his memoir.http://www.theexperiment.org/articles.php?news_id=2139There is not a shred of evidence, for example, that "a gas chamber was in the process of being built at Dachau, but it was never completed." (See "The Second Leuchter Report" by American gas chamber expert Fred Leuchter in The Journal of Historical Review, Fall 1990.) There is likewise no proof that "mentally and physically handicapped people were killed" by gas at any of the four "institutions" Wiesenthal mentions. This US Army photo was taken at Dachau on April 30, 1945, one day after the camp's capture. It shows a GI standing in front of a door marked with a skull and crossbones and the words "Caution! Gas! Life danger! Do not open!" According to the official caption, "these chambers were used by Nazi guards for killing prisoners of the infamous Dachau concentration camp." In fact, this is a small disinfection gas chamber used for delousing clothes. It was never used to kill people. For several decades, this photo has been widely reproduced to help keep alive the notorious Dachau "gas chamber" myth. (US Army photo SC 206194.)Besides the condensation below you can exam the various reviews of the REDCROSS covering WW2 during the time of the jews claimed astrocities commitedby the Germans.Inmates ReleasedMore than 200,000 prisoners were transferred from Auschwitz to other camps,and about 8,000 were in the camp when it was liberated by Soviet forces. Inaddition, about 1,500 prisoners who had served their sentences werereleased, and returned to their home countries. [16] If Auschwitz hadactually been a top secret extermination center, would the Germans havereleased inmates who "knew" what was happening there?Himmler Orders Death Rate Reducedhttp://www.ihr.org/books/hoggan/21.htmlhttp://www.outlawjournalism.com/news/?p=5803http://www.rense.com/general69/factua.htmhttp://www.777healthproducts.com/07g.htmhttp://www.intellnet.org/resources/resistance/holocaust/04.htm http://www.icrc.ch/Web/Eng/siteeng0.nsf/iwpList418/359CC4EF8A1E5C72C1256B66005B2171A little hard to obtain a report that is not heavily influenced by jewishpressure to includE holocaust AS THEY WOULD LIKE ALL TO SEE IT..So you will notice that holocaust is not denied just a quiet it was badetc.THE JEWS AND THE CONCENTRATION CAMPS:A FACTUAL APPRAISAL BY THE RED CROSS.There is one survey of the Jewish question in Europe during World WarTwo and the conditions of Germany's concentration camps which isalmost unique in its honesty and objectivity, the three-volume Reportof the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activitiesduring the Second World War, Geneva, 1948.This comprehensive account from an entirely neutral sourceincorporated and expanded the findings of two previous works:Documents sur l'activit� du CICR en faveur des civils d�tenus dans lescamps de concentration en Allemagne 1939-1945 (Geneva, 1946), andInter Arma Caritas: the Work of the ICRC during the Second World War(Geneva, 1947). The team of authors, headed by Fr�d�ric Siordet,explained in the opening pages of the Report that their object, in thetradition of the Red Cross, had been strict political neutrality, andherein lies its great value.The ICRC successfully applied the 1929 Geneva military convention inorder to gain access to civilian internees held in Central and WesternEurope by the Germany authorities. By contrast, the ICRC was unable togain any access to the Soviet Union, which had failed to ratify theConvention. The millions of civilian and military internees held inthe USSR, whose conditions were known to be by far the worst, werecompletely cut off from any international contact or supervision.The Red Cross Report is of value in that it first clarifies thelegitimate circumstances under which Jews were detained inconcentration camps, i.e. as enemy aliens. In describing the twocategories of civilian internees, the Report distinguishes the secondtype as "Civilians deported on administrative grounds (in German,"Schutzh�ftlinge"), who were arrested for political or racial motivesbecause their presence was considered a danger to the State or theoccupation forces" (Vol. 111, p. 73). These persons, it continues,"were placed on the same footing as persons arrested or imprisonedunder common law for security reasons." (P.74).The Report admits that the Germans were at first reluctant to permitsupervision by the Red Cross of people detained on grounds relating tosecurity, but by the latter part of 1942, the ICRC obtained importantconcessions from Germany. They were permitted to distribute foodparcels to major concentration camps in Germany from August 1942, and"from February 1943 onwards this concession was extended to all othercamps and prisons" (Vol. 111, p. 78). The ICRC soon establishedcontact with camp commandants and launched a food relief programmewhich continued to function until the last months of 1945, letters ofthanks for which came pouring in from Jewish internees.Red Cross Recipients Were JewsThe Report states that "As many as 9,000 parcels were packed daily.From the autumn of 1943 until May 1945, about 1,112,000 parcels with atotal weight of 4,500 tons were sent off to the concentration camps"(Vol. III, p. 80). In addition to food, these contained clothing andpharmaceutical supplies. "Parcels were sent to Dachau, Buchenwald,Sangerhausen, Sachsenhausen, Oranienburg, Flossenburg,Landsberg-am-Lech, Fl�ha, Ravensbr�ck, Hamburg-Neuengamme, Mauthausen,Theresienstadt, Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen, to camps near Vienna and inCentral and Southern Germany. The principal recipients were Belgians,Dutch, French, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, Poles and stateless Jews"(Vol. III, p. 83).In the course of the war, "The Committee was in a position to transferand distribute in the form of relief supplies over twenty millionSwiss francs collected by Jewish welfare organisations throughout theworld, in particular by the American Joint Distribution Committee ofNew York" (Vol. I, p. 644). This latter organisation was permitted bythe German Government to maintain offices in Berlin until the Americanentry into the war. The ICRC complained that obstruction of their vastrelief operation for Jewish internees came not from the Germans butfrom the tight Allied blockade of Europe. Most of their purchases ofrelief food were made in Rumania, Hungary and Slovakia.The ICRC had special praise for the liberal conditions which prevailedat Theresienstadt up to the time of their last visits there in April1945. This camp, "where there were about 40,000 Jews deported fromvarious countries was a relatively privileged ghetto" (Vol. III, p.75). According to the Report, "'The Committee's delegates were able tovisit the camp at Theresienstadt (Terezin) which was used exclusivelyfor Jews and was governed by special conditions. From informationgathered by the Committee, this camp had been started as an experimentby certain leaders of the Reich ... These men wished to give the Jewsthe means of setting up a communal life in a town under their ownadministration and possessing almost complete autonomy. . . twodelegates were able to visit the camp on April 6th, 1945. Theyconfirmed the favourable impression gained on the first visit" (Vol.I, p . 642).The ICRC also had praise for the regime of Ion Antonescu of FascistRumania where the Committee was able to extend special relief to183,000 Rumanian Jews until the time of the Soviet occupation. The aidthen ceased, and the ICRC complained bitterly that it never succeeded"in sending anything whatsoever to Russia" (Vol. II, p. 62). The samesituation applied to many of the German camps after their "liberation"by the Russians. The ICRC received a voluminous flow of mail fromAuschwitz until the period of the Soviet occupation, when many of theinternees were evacuated westward. But the efforts of the Red Cross tosend relief to internees remaining at Auschwitz under Soviet controlwere futile. However, food parcels continued to be sent to formerAuschwitz inmates transferred west to such camps as Buchenwald andOranienburg.No Evidence Of GenocideOne of the most important aspects of the Red Cross Report is that itclarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedly occurred inthe camps toward the end of the war. Says the Report: "In the chaoticcondition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of thewar, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimedan increasing number of victims. Itself alarmed by this situation, theGerman Government at last informed the ICRC on February 1st, 1945 ...In March 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC andGeneral of the S.S. Kaltenbrunner gave even more decisive results.Relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC, and one delegatewas authorised to stay in each camp ..." (Vol. III, p. 83).Clearly, the German authorities were at pains to relieve the diresituation as far as they were able. The Red Cross are quite explicitin stating that food supplies ceased at this time due to the Alliedbombing of German transportation, and in the interests of internedJews they had protested on March 15th, 1944 against "the barbarousaerial warfare of the Allies" (Inter Arma Caritas, p. 78). By October2nd, 1944, the ICRC warned the German Foreign Office of the impendingcollapse of the German transportation system, declaring thatstarvation conditions for people throughout Germany were becominginevitable.In dealing with this comprehensive, three-volume Report, it isimportant to stress that the delegates of the International Red Crossfound no evidence whatever at the camps in Axis occupied Europe of adeliberate policy to exterminate the Jews. In all its 1,600 pages theReport does not even mention such a thing as a gas chamber. It admitsthat Jews, like many other wartime nationalities, suffered rigours andprivations, but its complete silence on the subject of plannedextermination is ample refutation of the Six Million legend. Like theVatican representatives with whom they worked, the Red Cross founditself unable to indulge in the irresponsible charges of genocidewhich had become the order of the day. So far as the genuine mortalityrate is concerned, the Report points out that most of the Jewishdoctors from the camps were being used to combat typhus on the easternfront, so that they were unavailable when the typhus epidemics of 1945broke out in the camps (Vol. I, p. 204 ff) - Incidentally, it isfrequently claimed that mass executions were carried out in gaschambers cunningly disguised as shower facilities. Again the Reportmakes nonsense of this allegation. "Not only the washing places, butinstallations for baths, showers and laundry were inspected by thedelegates. They had often to take action to have fixtures made lessprimitive, and to get them repaired or enlarged" (Vol. III, p. 594).Not All Were InternedVolume III of the Red Cross Report, Chapter 3 (I. Jewish CivilianPopulation) deals with the "aid given to the Jewish section of thefree population," and this chapter makes it quite plain that by nomeans all of the European Jews were placed in internment camps, butremained, subject to certain restrictions, as part of the freecivilian population. This conflicts directly with the "thoroughness"of the supposed "extermination programme", and with the claim in theforged H�ss memoirs that Eichmann was obsessed with seizing "everysingle Jew he could lay his hands on."In Slovakia, for example, where Eichmann's assistant Dieter Wislicenywas in charge, the Report states that "A large proportion of theJewish minority had permission to stay in the country, and at certainperiods Slovakia was looked upon as a comparative haven of refuge forJews, especially for those coming from Poland. Those who remained inSlovakia seem to have been in comparative safety until the end ofAugust 1944, when a rising against the German forces took place. Whileit is true that the law of May 15th, 1942 had brought about theinternment of several thousand Jews, these people were held in campswhere the conditions of food and lodging were tolerable, and where theinternees were allowed to do paid work on terms almost equal to thoseof the free labour market" (Vol. I, p. 646).Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jewsavoid internment altogether, but the emigration of Jews continuedthroughout the war, generally by way of Hungary, Rumania and Turkey.Ironically, post-war Jewish emigration from German-occupiedterritories was also facilitated by the Reich, as in the case of thePolish Jews who had escaped to France before its occupation. "The Jewsfrom Poland who, whilst in France, had obtained entrance permits tothe United States were held to be American citizens by the Germanoccupying authorities, who further agreed to recognize the validity ofabout three thousand passports issued to Jews by the consulates ofSouth American countries" (Vol. I, p. 645).As future U.S. citizens, these Jews were held at the Vittel camp insouthern France for American aliens. The emigration of European Jewsfrom Hungary in particular proceeded during the war unhindered by theGerman authorities. "Until March 1944," says the. Red Cross Report,"Jews who had the privilege of visas for Palestine were free to leaveHungary" (Vol. I, p. 648). Even after the replacement of the HorthyGovernment in 1944 (following its attempted armistice with the SovietUnion) with a government more dependent on German authority, theemigration of Jews continued.The Committee secured the pledges of both Britain and the UnitedStates "to give support by every means to the emigration of Jews fromHungary," and from the U.S. Government the ICRC received a messagestating that "The Government of the United States ... now specificallyrepeats its assurance that arrangements will be made by it for thecare of all Jews who in the present circumstances are allowed toleave" (Vol. I, p . 649).Biedermann agreed that in the nineteen instances that "Did Six MillionReally Die?" quoted from the Report of the International Committee ofthe Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War and InterArma Caritas (this includes the above material), it did so accurately.A quote from Charles Biedermann (a delegate of the InternationalCommittee of the Red Cross and Director of the Red Cross'International Tracing Service) under oath at the Z�ndel Trial(February 9, 10, 11 and 12, 1988).http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=2735http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/14645862&referer=brief_results ACTUALLY -- AND CONTRARY TO HIS HIGHLY FLATTERING PUBLIC IMAGE -- THE RENOWNED "NAZI HUNTER" HAS A WELL-DOCUMENTED BUT LITTLE-KNOWN RECORD OF DECEIT, MENDACITY AND PREVARICATION. SOME HIGHLIGHTS: Wiesenthal repeatedly lied about his alleged role in locating Adolf Eichmann, was consistently wrong about Josef Mengele, and falsely accused Polish-American Frank Walus of having murdered Jews in Poland as a Gestapo official. Wiesenthal has absurdly charged that the Germans exterminated Jews in "electrocution chambers," and that they manufactured bars of soap from the bodies of murdered Jews. His deception about his own wartime activities prompted Austrian Chancellor Bruno Kreisky (himself of Jewish ancestry) to accuse the "Nazi hunter" of having collaborated with his wartime oppressors. (For details about Wiesenthal's record, see: M. Weber, "Simon Wiesenthal: Bogus Nazi Hunter," The Journal of Historical Review, Winter 1989-90.) THE CANADIAN JEWISH NEWS, Jan. 30, 1992 Wannsee's importance rejected London (JTA) - An Israeli Holocaust scholar has debunked the Wannsee Conference, at which top Nazi officials are said to have gathered at a villa in a Berlin suburb in 1942 to draw the blueprints of the "Final Solution." According to Prof. Yehuda Bauer (photo) of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Wannsee was a meeting, "but hardly a conference", and "little of what was said there was executed in detail." "The public still repeats, time after time, the silly story that at Wannsee the extermination of the Jews was arrived at." "I have never held myself out to be a Holocaust expert, nor have I written books about what is now called the Holocaust." "I have done my best to prepare the case that follows, but I respectfully submit that I do not have any duty to become an expert on the Holocaust, my Lord." "I have never claimed to be a Holocaust historian. As I have said, I have no written no book about the Holocaust. I have written no article about it. If I have spoken about it, it is usually because somebody has asked me a question, I have been questioned about it. On such occasions I have emphasised my lack of expertise and I have expatiated only upon those areas with which I am familiar." http://www.fpp.co.uk/Legal/Penguin/transcripts/day002.htm: "Now, you heard me say in my opening statement, Mr Rampton, that I am not an expert on the Holocaust. What I would now say would be a figure without any value whatsoever." "Q. [Rampton] What you do you say about Sobibor, Treblinka, Belzec and Chelmno?" "A. [Irving] Nothing at all. I am not an expert." RJ.Winston Churchill wrote a five volume history of World War II and nevermentioned the holocaust. He never mentioned it because he knew that theholocaust was just wartime propaganda and he did not want to sully what hehoped would be the definitive history of the war with propaganda that commonsense alone could refute. I could go on but the evidence I speak of isavailable to The Jubilee readers from many patriotic sources even though itis still widely censored by America's media and libraries.I once considered the battle over the holocaust as a great political trumpcard allowing us to take back the moral high ground on the censorship issuefrom the left. But I see now that it is much more important than that. Theholocaust is qualitatively different than the silly lies nations tell theircitizens to get them so fired up they will send their children to die inforeign wars. The holocaust is not pre-war propaganda. It is post-warpropaganda.Why do we need post World War II propaganda? Because World War II was thegreatest human catastrophe in two thousand years for the Aryan peoples andwe "gentiles" must not be allowed to see the truth. It was more than theslaughter of our racial kinsmen and the destruction of our racial homeland.World War II was the most significant crossroads the Christian nations havefaced since Herman faced the legions of Rome in the forests of Teutonberg2,000 years ago. But Herman won the battle of Teutonberg Wald. The Christianworld lost World War II. We lost because we came to a crossroads and wentthe wrong way.http://www.nafcash.com/Lest you think there must be some truth to the alleged Treblinka holocaust NAFCASH TM is offering a $250,000.00 REWARD For locating JUST ONE of the alleged "HUGE MASS GRAVES" of Treblinka NAFCASH TM presents THE TREBLINKA CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATION CHALLENGE TM You must scientifically - forensically prove the grave's EXACT location,its EXACT dimensions and its EXACT volumetric density. The cremated remains must total AT LEAST one percent of the alleged massmurder. JUST ONE MASS GRAVE! - JUST ONE PERCENT!http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/holohoax.htm HOW TO KEEP ACADEMICS QUIET The Real Issue Is Israel's Human Rights Record: A statement by Norman G. Finkelstein upon publication of Beyond Chutzpah Professor Alan Dershowitz of Harvard University is currently best known for his advocacy of the "most excruciating" torture against terrorist suspects such as a "needle being shoved under the fingernails." The alleged purpose of this torture is to extract a truthful confession but its real consequence, as human rights organizations have pointed out, is to produce whatever statements are necessary to end the suffering.For 15 months Dershowitz has applied a variant of this truth-seeking technique -- less physically painful but no less excruciating -- to prospective publishers of Beyond Chutzpah, which offers a critical examination of Israel's human rights record and Dershowitz's defense of it. Enlisting one of the most powerful law firms in the country after his personal initiatives proved unsuccessful, Dershowitz has repeatedly threatened to bankrupt highly respected publishers with litigation if they didn't cancel publication of my book. He could then proclaim that the cancellation confirmed the "truth" that Beyond Chutzpah didn't meet scholarly standards. Dershowitz justified these blackmail tactics on the ground that Beyond Chutzpah libels him. Yet, when I first began to expose his gross scholarly misconduct, Dershowitz publicly declared at UCLA (on 21 October 2003) that he wouldn't respond with a libel action because he believed "so strongly in the First Amendment and full freedom of speech." Ironically, just as he was threatening my publishers with expensive and time-consuming lawsuits, Dershowitz denounced Holocaust denier David Irving, who had sued Deborah Lipstadt for libel, with these words: "Before Irving lost his case [against Lipstadt], several publishers had refused to issue books critical of Irving, out of fear of his bringing expensive and time-consuming lawsuits. That was a chilling of free speech" (Afterword to Lipstadt's History on Trial; his emphasis). My publisher, University of California Press, was understandably at great pains to fend off a potential lawsuit by Dershowitz; for an academic publisher the associated costs would have been ruinous, to the point of making certain victory meaningless. On occasion our relationship became strained and at one point it appeared as if we had reached an impasse. However, through the skillful mediation of Nation magazine senior editor Roane Carey (who was the freelance editor of Beyond Chutzpah) and others, a satisfactory compromise was reached that protected the interests of both publisher and author, and, most importantly, preserved the integrity of the book. I would like personally to extend my heartfelt thanks to all who supported me and the press during this difficult period."Another Frenchman, Paul Rassinier, a pre-war communist and later asocialist, had been a member of the French Resistance. He was arrested andinterned in concentration camps, among them Buchenwald. In 1948 he publisheda book Crossing the Line, in which he argued that people might have beenkilled in concentration camps, but that the perpetrators had acted on theirown, not on orders from headquarters.AS WITH ABU GRAIB."The saving of the Jews in Europe did not figure at the head of the list ofpriorities of the ruling class. It was the foundation of the State which wasprimordial in their eyes." "The masses of Jews from Hungary's ghettos obediently boarded thedeportation trains without knowing their fate. They were full of confidence in the false information that they were being transferred toKenyermeze.The truth is that somewhere between 700,000 and 1,500,000 people died inGerman work camps in 1944 and 1945. Most of them were Jews. Many were not.Most of them died in the last six months of the war from disease and hungercaused by America's bombing of Germany and subsequent destruction of herinfrastructure. There were some atrocities but very few. Few people realizethat the International Red Cross had a field office in Auschwiz from 1942 untilthe end of the war. That office never reported or recorded any atrocities (Several years agointernational Jewry forced the Red Cross to apologize to the Jews -apologize for not seeing something that never happened.)Clearly, the German authorities were at pains to relieve the dire situationas far as they were able. The Red Cross are quite explicit in stating thatfood supplies ceased at this time due to the Allied bombing of Germantransportation, and in the interests of interned Jews they had protested onMarch 15th, 1944 against "the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies" (InterArma Caritas, p. 78). By October 2nd, 1944, the ICRC warned the GermanForeign Office of the impending collapse of the German transportationsystem, declaring that starvation conditions for people throughout Germanywere becoming inevitable.A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz-Birkenau from Hungaryin July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly gassed and cremated daily.She likewise testified after the war that she heard and saw nothing of "gaschambers" during the time she was interned there. She heard the gassingstories only later. [15]Inmates ReleasedMore than 200,000 prisoners were transferred from Auschwitz to other camps,and about 8,000 were in the camp when it was liberated by Soviet forces. Inaddition, about 1,500 prisoners who had served their sentences werereleased, and returned to their home countries. [16] If Auschwitz hadactually been a top secret extermination center, would the Germans havereleased inmates who "knew" what was happening there?Himmler Orders Death Rate Reduced http://www.ifamericansknew.org/http://www.ussliberty.org/"Asgard" <asg...@home.net wrote in messagenews:zZadnTJAIc9c0_DY...@giganews.com...� What a load of emotive old bollocks, bullshit and lies. The narrator states the inmates were "starving' at Bergen Belsen, yet the vast majority of the inmates look positively fat and shiny. He goes on to say those dead, had died of starvation, yet earlier stated they'd not eaten for only 6 days. The images of the dead showed mainly emaciated corpses, nothing like the people still moving around. If they'd died of "starvation", why had the vasst majority of the inmates not suffered the same fate. Why, indeed wasit only the corpses which were emaciated. What I found particularly intersting, was significant incidence ofpetachiae on the bodies of the dead. THIS IS A CLASSIC SIGN OF EPIDEMIC TYPHUS. The documentary was made in 2005, by a yid, and I note they're stillusing the mythical 4million figure for deaths at Auschsitz. Haven't correctedthe script. They also state, quite clearly, there were 6m jewish deaths in camps. No mention of the supposed Einzatzgroupen. The entire documentary is a farcical attempt heighten the victimhoodstatus of yids. Any of the experts like to comment? Keenan? You're an expert oneverything. Gord, likewise. McFey? Got any answers chaps? I look forward to your attempts to shoot this one down.Russian troops marched into Berlin on April 24, 1945, they found 800 Jewsalive and well in Berlin's Jewish hospital.http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/april/21/newsid_3560000/3560175.stm51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration With the Nazishttp://www.wrmea.com/archives/Sept_2004/0409086.html"Topaz" <mars...@hotmail.com wrote in messagenews:pklr449roj8r6c7uf...@4ax.com... "The orthodox holocaust story can not possibly be defended with rational arguments because its absurdity is overwhelming. We are asked to believe in the fata morgana of a vast slaughter in killing factories which left no traces whatsoever - no documents, no bones, no teeth, no ashes - nothing! We are further asked to believe that the Allies, who had a large network of informers all over Europe and a spy in the German leadership (Admiral Canaris, the head of the German intelligence), did not become aware of this gigantic genocide until the end of the war, for if they had known about the mass murder, they would have acted to stop it. Finally, we are asked to believe that the Jews in Poland, the epicentre of the holocaust, did not know anything about the Auschwitz gas chambers as late as in August 1944, otherwise the Jews from the Lodz ghetto would not have gone to Auschwitz voluntarily - which is precisely what they did, as related by Raul Hilberg in his standard work about the holocaust (Die Vernichtung der europaeischen Juden, p. 543/544). As the Zionist-controlled system of the "Western democracies" is woefully unable to counter the revisionists with arguments, it resorts to censorship and brute force in order to silence the dangerous heretics. And the Jews are gradually transforming the holocaust into a religion. This is a very clever strategy, for as Robert Faurisson aptly remarks, one cannot refute a religion with scientific arguments. Thus, the holocaust museums and holocaust monuments spreading like mushrooms all over America and Europe are really temples of the new religion, whereas professional "holocaust survivors" such as Elie Wiesel are the priests of the new religion. To prove this assertion, we only have to quote Wiesel himself: "The Holocaust is a holy mystery, the secret of which is limited to the circle of the priesthood of survivors" (Peter Novick, The Holocaust in American Life, 1999, p. 211, 212, retranslated from the German). Another high priest of the holocaust cult, Simon Wiesenthal, goes even further: "When each of us comes before the Six Million, we will be asked what we did with our lives... I will say: I did not forget you" (Simon Wiesenthal in Response, Vol. 20, Nr. 1). No critical questions about the holocaust are allowed because they are a blasphemy: They cause immense distress to the eternal victims of persecution, the Jews, and are an attempt to whitewash National Socialism - the most evil ideology of all times which made the holocaust possible! In today's Germany, it is even considered inadmissible to compare the holocaust with the atrocities of communist tyrants such as Stalin or Cambodian dictator Pol Pot because this is regarded as a "relativisation" and "trivialization" of the worst crime in history. French Zionist propagandist Claude Lanzmann, the producer of a long and unspeakably dull film about the holocaust (the title of this film is Shoa, the Hebrew word for "catastrophe", which is often used by Jews as a synonym for "holocaust") makes no effort to conceal that the holocaust cult is to replace Christianity: "If Auschwitz is something other than a horror of history, then Christianity totters in its foundations. Christ is the Son of God, who went to the end of the humanely endurable, where he endured the cruellest suffering. (...) If Auschwitz is true, then there is a human suffering with which that of Christ simply cannot be compared. (...) In this case, Christ is false, and salvation will not come from him. (...) Auschwitz is the refutation of Christ." (Les temps modernes, Paris, December 1993, p. 132, 133.) Nowadays, a large percentage of the Jews do not believe in God any more, but virtually all of them believe in the Six Million. The Zionist leadership cunningly exploits the holocaust to unite the World's Jews by keeping them in a constant state of hysteria and persecution mania, insinuating that only if the Jews stick together will they be able to ban the threat of a new holocaust. It goes without saying that very few Non-Jews are willing to embrace the murky holocaust religion. While the overwhelming majority of people in the West still believe that the official holocaust version is essentially true (even if they suspect that the figures might me somewhat inflated), they are thoroughly fed up with the eternal lamentation about Jewish victims and Jewish suffering. They simply don't want to hear it any more. In Germany, opinion polls showed that a vast majority of the population was against the planned holocaust monument in Berlin (which not a single major party, not a single leading politician and not a single big newspaper dared to oppose). Privately, the politicians are probably as profoundly disgusted with the endless holocaust litany as the rest of the population, but they cannot possibly afford to let the revisionists win because this would shatter the very foundations of the "democratic" system to which they own their careers and their wealth... The ultimate weapon against Zionism and the state of Israel At the end of the year 2000, Israel is a besieged country, but from the military point of view, it is still vastly superior to its neighbours, and it enjoys the unconditional support of the United States. Should any of the Islamic states grow strong enough to seriously threaten Israel, it would most probably be attacked and militarily annihilated by America. Russia is not likely to risk a confrontation with the USA for the sake of the Palestinians. We can certainly admire the bravery of the Palestinians resistance fighters who are willing to sacrifice their lives to liberate their homeland from the alien intruders, but realistically, they have no chance to win. The Palestinians have stones and slings. The Israelis have helicopters and tanks. You can't destroy helicopters and tanks with stones and slings. When fighting one's enemy, one should always look for his weakest spot. The weakest spot of Israel, its Achilles heel, is the holocaust lie to which it owes its existence. The revisionists can give the adversaries of Israel and international Zionism a terrible weapon. It is quite true that many revisionists are by no means guided by political considerations. Some of them - Carlo Mattogno is a good example - are only motivated by intellectual curiosity: They want to ascertain what really happened to the Jews during the Second World War. But even if revisionism is not a political movement, its political implications are tremendous. The revisionists are endeavouring to find out the truth, and truth is the deadliest enemy of Israel and international Jewry. Thus, the revisionists objectively work against Israel and Zionism, even if subjectively their goals are often purely scientific and devoid of any political ambition. This is, of course, the reason why they are persecuted and their books burnt in more and more countries. In view of the total Jewish media control and the ever-growing anti-revisionist repression in many Western countries, it is very difficult indeed to achieve a revisionist breakthrough. We revisionists are facing an uphill struggle which can only partly be explained by our total lack of financial resources. Fortunately the internet, which the Jews are unable to censure, has greatly improved our possibilities to make the results of our research known to the World, but all the same, we should not cherish naive illusions: Not every citizen of the Western world who is informed about the revisionist arguments will automatically become revisionist and anti-Zionist. The average person in the West - and particularly in Germany - has been so thoroughly brainwashed that a sudden exposure to the truth can provoke a nervous breakdown or stomach cramps. I have repeatedly witnessed this myself. Other people would gladly accept the truth about the holocaust, but as they know that even the slightest suspicion of revisionism leads to social ostracism, economic ruin and legal persecution, they understandably prefer not to get involved. However, if we want to win the war against those whom one of my Russian friends called "the enemies of God and mankind".. The logical consequence of all this is that those countries which are authentically anti-Zionist and real friends of the oppressed Palestinian people should make the breakthrough of holocaust revisionism their foremost priority. A tank costs millions of dollars, yet one soldier can destroy it with a single missile. The revisionists can provide anti-Zionist freedom fighters with a weapon not even a thousand missiles can destroy." http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/ http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.htmlWell the claim that they were fighting for a homeland might float, howeverif the are still more concerned about jewish aims and dreams than weighingthis of with the requirements of the other non jewish citizens in thecountries in which they reside, then obviously the non jewish citizens havereason to object and ignore their claims at the expense of their own wealth, lives and wellbeing.We have already paid a top price for assisting jews in their selfish selfishself centred aims.Casualties in WW2Not including the documented 5 million non Jewish in concentration campswho far out numbered the suspected true number of Jewish victims. And thisis without lies and exaggerations about non jewish cassualities.Soviet Union 25,568,000China 11,324,000Germany 7,060,000Poland 6,850,000Japan 1,806,000Yugoslavia 1,700,000Rumania 985,000France 810,000Austria 525,000Italy 410,000Great Britain 388,000USA 295,000Holland 250,000Belgium 85,000Finland 79,000Canada 42,000India 36,000Australia 29,000Albania 28,000Spain 22,000Bulgaria 21,000New Zealand 12,000Norway 10,000South Africa 9,000Luxembourg 5,000Denmark 4,000TOTAL 58,353,000The Jewish ghetto police always had the option, she said, of "throwing offtheir uniforms and joining the rest of us" - a point that Yitzak Zuckerman,a leader of the Warsaw ghetto uprising, made in his memoir.http://www.theexperiment.org/articles.php?news_id=2139Without Jewish co operation through the zionists the Germans would neverhave had the resources to herd the Jews into the various camps. And thezionists made it impossible for the underground to trust the jews.Like elsewhere, the only people who had the information and the ear of thefrightened Jewish population were the Judenrat. In this case the Judenratcomprised mainly the Zionist Federation members. Without their help the SS,with 19 officers and less than 90 men, plus a few hundred Hungarian police,could not have collected and controlled a million Jews, when they did noteven know their whereabouts.So no reluctance amongst jews as they knew that they were simply beingencamped._____________________________________THE PROBLEM BEING THAT THE ONLY WILD AND WEIRD ACCOUNTS OF UNTRAMMELLEDHORROR CAME FROM ONLY JEWS.NON JEWS COMPLETELY CONTRADICTED THE WILD STORIES FROM THE CONTRACTINGMUSCLES TO THE SOAP AND TATTOOED LAMPSHADES, ALL BS.During World WarII, Rassinier was a highly decorated member of the FrenchResistance. In October of 1943 he was arrested by the Gestapo for variousactivities including the smuggling of Jewish refugees over the Franco-Swissborder took 2 years to publish his book because of persistent resistanceby the jewish clique.http://www.ihr.org/books/rassinier/debunking1-0.htmlhttp://www.ihr.org/books/hoggan/A4.htmlhttp://www.fpp.co.uk/bookchapters/articles/HowWarsBegin.htmlhttp://www.anti-rev.org/textes/VidalNaquet92a/part-6.htmlhttp://www.alibris.com/search/books/author/Paul_RassinierBut the huge money involved in the reparations won out and we have anothertrue report labeled as a revision against the lies that were spread andapparently plenty of jewish and jewish supporters willing to jump on thebandwagon and build up the stories, supply all sorts of shonky evidence tosupport the lies.And of course the jewish money made it very iffy for experts to testifybecause of the constant arttacks , false ads on the net. in books and byevery jew and his mother of all ages whose chances of being either witnessesof involved were/are slimmer but apparently the courts i n Germany also helpthe cause of falsifying evidence.Although even honest jews could not sway the lies and Finklestein likeRassinier, Harry Elmer Barnes(http://www.amazon.com/Perpetual-Peace-Harry-Elmer-Barnes/dp/0939484013http://www.courts.fsnet.co.uk/harryelmerbarnes.htm and of course you willfind the jewish supporters here labelling him as a revisionist because hedid not agree with their versionhttp://www.revisionists.com/revisionists/barnes.htmlhttp://tmh.floonet.net/articles/barnes.html ), Charles A. Beard(http://www.questia.com/read/6153679?title=Cross%20Currents%20in%20Europe%20To-Dayhttp://www.questia.com/SM.qst ) , Herman Hesse(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Complete_Fairy_Tales_of_Hermann_Hesse ) confession is from Hoess. Here are the details: "In the introduction to Death Dealer [Buffalo: Prometheus, 1992], the historian Steven Paskuly wrote: "Just after his capture in 1946, the British Security Police were able to extract a statement from Hoess by beating him and filling him with liquor." Paskuly was reiterating what Rupert Butler and Bernard Clarke had already described. In 1983, Rupert Butler published an unabashed memoir (Legions of Death, Hamlyn: London) describing in graphic detail how, over three days, he and Clarke and other British policemen managed to torture Hoess into making a "coherent statement." According to Butler [Legions of Death, p. 237], he and the other interrogators put the boots to Hoess the moment he was captured. For starters, Clarke struck his face four times to get H�ess to reveal his true identity. <quote The admission suddenly unleashed the loathing of Jewish sergeants in the arresting party whose parents had died in Auschwitz following an order signed by H�ss. The prisoner was torn from the top bunk, the pajamas ripped from his body. He was then dragged naked to one of the slaughter tables, where it seemed to Clarke the blows and screams were endless. Eventually, the Medical Officer urged the Captain: "Call them off, unless you want to take back a corpse." A blanket was thrown over H�ss and he was dragged to Clarke's car, where the sergeant poured a substantial slug of whisky down his throat. H�ss tried to sleep. Clarke thrust his service stick under the man's eyelids and ordered in Geffnan: "Keep your pig eyes open, you swine." For the first time H�ss trotted out his oft-repeated justification: "I took my orders from Himmler. I was a soldier in the same way as you are a soldier and we had to obey orders." The party arrived back at Heide around three in the morning. The snow was swirling still, but the blanket was torn from H�ss and he was made to walk completely nude through the prison yard to his cell. </quote An article in the British newspaper Wrexham Leader [Mike Mason, "In a cell with a Nazi war criminal-We kept him awake until he confessed," October 17, 1986] following the airing of a TV documentary on the case of Rudolf Hoess included eyewitness recollections by Ken Jones: <quote Mr. Ken Jones was then a private with the Fifth Royal Horse Artillery stationed at Heid[e] in Schleswig-Holstein. "They brought him to us when he refused to cooperate over questioning about his activities during the war. He came in the winter of 1945/6 and was put in a small jail cell in the barracks," recalls Mr. Jones. Two other soldiers were detailed with Mr. Jones to join H�ss in his cell to help break him down for interrogation. "We sat in the cell with him, night and day, armed with axe handles. Our job was to prod him every time he fell asleep to help break down his resistance," said Mr. Jones. When H�ss was taken out for exercise he was made to wear only jeans and a cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three days and nights without sleep, H�ss finally broke down and made a full confession to the authorities. </quote The confession Hoess signed was numbered document NO-1210; later revamped, as document PS-3868, which became the basis for an oral deposition Hoess made for the IMT on April 15, 1946, a month after it had been extracted from him by torture... Since what people confess to after they have been captured by the Communists and their liberal comrades is not proof of anything, this leaves only the stories of survivors. These contradict each other and not believable. One professional survivor said that he could tell if the Germans were gassing German Jews or Polish Jews by the color of the smoke. The fact that there are so many "survivors" is not proof of an extermination plan. There may be six million survivors. Just about every Jew that is old says he is a survivor.Frederick Bausman (http://www.thenation.com/archive/detail/13677001 ) allthe honest teachers and historians were labelled nazi , which of course theywerent, but if you point out the lies the only support you are going to getis from anti semitic groups.And of course there is the decent honest jew tired of the lies.A statement by Norman G. Finkelstein upon publication of Beyond Chutzpahhttp://www.nowar-paix.ca/nowar/forum/6973http://666ismoney.com/HolocaustAds.htmlI, Raquel Baranow am a Grad Student of Holocaust Denial. There are personswith PhD's in various fields whoalso deny the 6 million canard. The best evidence is forensic. Untilrecently, there was never a forensicexamination of the alleged murder weapon (gas chambers). Demographic figuresare incomplete. After the fallof East Europe to communism, many of the millions of Jews who fled Polandinto the Soviet Union or ended upbehind the Iron Curtain changed their names to assimilate, many civiliansdied in the war, many died in theconcentration camps of louse-born typhus. During World War One, two millioncivilians in the Soviet Union diedof typhus. Many died in Stalin's gulags.Yad Vashem,( http://www.yadvashem.org/wps/portal/IY_HON_Welcome)a HolocaustDocumentation Center in Israel has a database of 3,000,000 alleged victimsof Naziextermination. But as you can see HERE(http://666ismoney.com/YadVashem.html) (my maiden name, Friedemann), nearlyevery name is listed at leasttwice, some as many as five times!http://www.yadvashem.org/lwp/workplace/IY_HON_WelcomeYad Vashem's 3,000,000 "Holocaust victims" database lists nearlyeveryone twice. Some as many at five times. Anyone, includingyou can submit a "Page of Testimony".And of course we have lists duplicated, unconfirmed, but 3m according to ourusual jewish/Zionist sources.Put your name in, you might be missing out on reparations.Has been improvements since this, numbers still very dicey.Name Town District RegionCountry Bday SourceFriedemann Adolf Berlin Berlin Berlin Germany1879 list of victims from GermanyFriedemann Adolf Berlin Berlin Berlin Germany1879 list of deportation from BerlinFriedemann Adolf Berlin Berlin Berlin Germany1905 list of deportation from BerlinIt is forensically impractical or impossible to exterminate millions withlouse disinfestant (hydrogen cyanide gas)or diesel exhaust as alleged by malicious "witnesses" or torturedconfessors. There are no written orders forextermination. Aerial reconnaissance photographs of the concentration campsshow no smoke and flamesbelching from the crematoria and pyres as alleged. The photos and recordsshow there was not enough coke orcrematoria to cremate millions of corpses. The "witnesses" and confessorslied about how many minutes it takesto cremate a corpse. Diesel exhaust does not contain significant amount ofcarbon monoxide to kill a human. Ifthe Nazis wanted to kill millions they could have driven the coal firedtrain into a tunnel or quonset hut and gassed'em with the exhaust from the locomotive or used the exhaust from thecrematoria. At Auschwitz, during a typhusepidemic, up to 300 people died per day, hence the crematoria, shaving ofheads and requisitions for tons ofZyklon B louse disinfestant. HCN is a very dangerous, impractical, messymethod for extermination.http://www.vho.org/The Holocaust Controversy A Case for open DebateThe Gas Chambers are a fraud, a tourist attraction, slander, demonizing,impractical/impossible, maliciousatrocity propaganda spread by the communists, who hated Hitler andperpetrated by Jews, who were alwayslooking for ways to get to the lands of milk and money. The Jews haveextorted billions from the US Treasury,Germany, Swiss banks and insurance companies on account of the Holohoaxfraud. The Holohoax also makesthose who fought Hitler feel like they did something good fighting thedemon, Hitler instead of letting Hitler takeon Stalin alone.A "liberal" person has an open mind. A bigot is irrational and obstinate.And then we have the honest red cross with no ulterior motives.The New Blasphemyby Tom BlairNews Editor, The JubileeThere was a time when a man did not blaspheme God in America. There weresevere social proscriptions against it. Some communities even had lawsagainst blasphemy. Well blasphemy is still a great sin in America and maysoon be a crime again. But sadly America has a new god and so, a newblasphemy.Let me here commit the new blasphemy while it is still legal. What we knowas the "holocaust" is largely war-time propaganda. Propaganda that, unlikemost war-time propaganda, was not quietly forgotten. Instead it hascontinued; grown more fantastic, more hateful, and more dangerous toquestion every year since 1945.The truth is that somewhere between 700,000 and 1,500,000 people died inGerman work camps in 1944 and 1945. Most of them were Jews. Many were not.Most of them died in the last six months of the war from disease and hungercaused by America's bombing of Germany and subsequent destruction of herinfrastructure. There were some atrocities but very few. Few people realizethat the International Red Cross had a field office in Auschwiz from 1942until the end of the war. That office never reported or recorded anyatrocities (Several years ago international Jewry forced the Red Cross toapologize to the Jews - apologize for not seeing something that neverhappened.)� WARNING To People in Austria; Belgium; France; Germany; Israel; Spain and Switzerland. You can be fined, imprisoned or both for discussing the topics set forth in this article.It was only after I moved to the Los Angeles area several years ago that Irealized that many people were not aware that millions of victims of theHolocaust were NOT Jewish. Outside the Polish community, I heard very littlemention about the five million non-Jewish victims -- usually referred to as"the othersSubject: Israeli rabbi backs Jewish suicide attacks Organization: Copyright1997 by Reuters Lines: 43 Date: Tue, 8 Apr 1997 9:22:44 PDT Kidnappings, Beatings, Murders and HangingsAttacks by the Irgun and Stern Gang - In 1944, with the end the war insight, Irgun, now under the leadership of Menachem Begin , the future PrimeMinister of Israel 1977-83, began to attack the British administration inPalestine, starting with bomb attacks on the immigration offices, taxoffices and police stations. http://www.britains-smallwars.com/Palestine/kidnap.htmThe Americans were strongly pro Jewish and very anti British. One Hollywoodmotion picture Mogul declared in the British press that he had a holiday inhis heart every time a British soldier was killed in Palestine. and largesections of the American media echoed this sentiment.November 27 -Eight British soldiers killed in bomb attack on police station Jerusalem,Palestine, in Jewish Irgun terrorist attack.http://www.cdiss.org/terror_1940s.htmJuly 22 - Ninety people killed and forty five wounded after Jewishterrorists blow up the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, Palestine, which washome to British government and military offices. The terrorists held workersat pistol point while they planted the explosives in the basement of thehotel.July 12 - Jewish Irgun terrorists kidnap and then hang two British Armysergeants. The terrorists were trying to secure the release of three Irgunmembers who had been sentenced to death by the British authorities inPalestine.September 29 - Jewish Irgun terrorists bomb police station in Haifa,Palestine, killing four British and four Arab policemen, as well as two Arabcivilians. Forty six people injured.http://forum.cari.com.my/archiver/?tid-117974.htmlDecember 4, 1948New Palestine PartyVisit of Menachem Begin and Aims of Political Movement DiscussedTO THE EDITORS OF THE NEW YORK TIMES:Among the most disturbing political phenomena of our times is the emergencein the newly created state of Israel of the "Freedom Party" (Tnuat Haherut),a political party closely akin in its organization, methods, politicalphilosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties. It was formedout of the membership and following of the former Irgun Zvai Leumi, aterrorist, right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine.Attack on Arab VillageA shocking example was their behavior in the Arab village of Deir Yassin.This village, off the main roads and surrounded by Jewish lands, had takenno part in the war, and had even fought off Arab bands who wanted to use thevillage as their base. On April 9 (THE NEW YORK TIMES), terrorist bandsattacked this peaceful village, which was not a military objective in thefighting, killed most of its inhabitants - 240 men, women, and children -and kept a few of them alive to parade as captives through the streets ofJerusalem. Most of the Jewish community was horrified at the deed, and theJewish Agency sent a telegram of apology to King Abdullah of Trans-Jordan.But the terrorists, far from being ashamed of their act, were proud of thismassacre, publicized it widely, and invited all the foreign correspondentspresent in the country to view the heaped corpses and the general havoc atDeir Yassin.The Deir Yassin incident exemplifies the character and actions of theFreedom Party. (signed)Isidore Abramowitz, Hannah Arendt, Abraham Brick, Rabbi Jessurun Cardozo,Albert Einstein, Herman Eisen, M.D., Hayim Fineman, M. Gallen, M.D., H.H.Harris, Zelig S. Harris, Sidney Hook, Fred Karush, Bruria Kaufman, Irma L.Lindheim, Nachman Maisel, Symour Melman, Myer D. Mendelson, M.D., Harry M.Orlinsky, Samuel Pitlick, Fritz Rohrlich, Louis P. Rocker, Ruth Sager,Itzhak Sankowsky, I.J. Schoenberg, Samuel Shuman, M. Znger, Irma Wolpe,Stefan WolpeNew York, Dec. 2, 1948[/quote]http://comment.independent.co.uk/commentators/article1197235.ece"B.H. Cramer" <benj...@yourservice.com wrote in messagenews:4MKdnSvnVuD_lmrV...@giganews.com... "Jason P" <jas...@REMOVE.gmail.com wrote in message news:xY6dndIdJenal2rV...@earthlink.com... "B.H. Cramer" <benj...@yourservice.com wrote in message news:fvmdnZT_ff_ILmnV...@giganews.com... NEVER FORGET: "Deborah Lipstadt, author of the anti-revisionistpolemic Denying the Holocaust, has assigned [Binjamin Wilkormiski's book] Fragments in her Emory University class on Holocaust memoirs. When confrontedwith evidence that it is a fraud [the author spent the war in comfort in Switzerland, not Auschwitz, and was not even a Jew], she commentedthat the new revelations 'might complicate matters somewhat, but [the work] is still powerful.'" - In other words, who cares about fact or fiction where the Holocaustis concerned? And she had the classic Jew audacity to discredit David Irving, andthen make news about it, going on TV with her Jewtardian anti-revisionismsound bites. Jason P Lipstadt is a disgusting, ugly, lying jewess, who is a tad smarter than cohen. Here's some questions put to the slag which she has never acknowledged. Questions for Lipstadt WE ARE often asked for questions to put to Professor Lipstadt in her well-funded peregrinations around the world. ________________________________________ . . . here are just a few: 1. Prof. Lipstadt - why were you afraid to go into the witness box and expose yourself even to the questioning of an amateur like Mr. Irving?You effectively pleaded the Fifth Amendment, which is the traditional routeof those with something to hide. (Mr. Irving subjected himself voluntarilyto three weeks' cross examination by one of the world's leading triallawyers, and he voluntarily made available to you his entire private and public papers.) 2. are you aware that one of your main researchers, Dr. David Cesarani,said that Mr. Irving gave the defence some scary moments, particularly whentheir chief expert witness on the architecture of Auschwitz, Prof. Van Pelt, proved unable to explain what had happened to the bodies (i.e. thelogistics of disposing, for example, of 450,000 Hungarian Jews' bodies in three weeks - around 50,000 tons of corpses, by a small Sonderkommando in one crematory building) [Internet link: see http://www.fpp.co.uk/docs/trial3/DieZeit120400e.html] 3. why did you not accept David Irving's challenge, made three times publicly in the courtroom, that he would halt the case in mid-trial ifyou could find any evidence of the holes in the roof slab of Crematorium IIat Auschwitz - which still exists - through which "eye witnesses" in the payof war-crimes prosecution teams claimed to have seen SS officers tipping the Zyklon B granules? Your own chief witness Van Pelt said there are no such holes in the slab, so somebody lied, right? 4. why are you afraid of free debate? You have said there is no debate,but when push came to shove your highly paid Queen's Counsel felt itnecessary to fill the courtroom every day for three months with over thirtylawyers, counsel, barristers, assistants, historians, and researchers, just tostand up against Mr. Irving, who appeared in court alone. Was your case really that weak? 5. why have you and your friends done all you can to muzzle Mr. Irving -by putting pressure on publishers, broadcasters, television companies, and governments not to allow him to speak or to publish his widelyacknowledged books? What are you scared of? 6. in a trial which was about a very serious matter, why did you instruct your counsel to resort to smear tactics, branding Mr. Irving as an anti-Semite and a racist (although he, unlike your Counsel, frequently employs ethnic minorities as his personal staff), and although neither allegation was made in your book or pleaded in your initial Defence? Were you frightened of fighting the case on the facts of history? 7. how much money have you made out of this trial (articles, speakingfees, etc.) already? That's what it's about, isn't it - money? 8. do you think it right that your lawyers paid some of your so called "neutral" expert witnesses a quarter of a million dollars in inducementsto testify in your favour? Those six million dollars put up by Steven Spielberg - you are a religious scholar: Have you never heard the Biblesay, "Good wine needs no bush"? If your case is rock solid why was so muchmoney swilling around that London courtroom? [Internet link: http://www.fpp.co.uk/Legal/Penguin/experts/payments.html] 9. a new Zealand academic tribunal has just found that Prof. RichardEvans, your chief witness, was guilty of grossly distorting, misquoting, exaggerating, and polemicizing in his similar "expert report" on Dr. Joel Hayward, and totally lacking in the objectivity that is expected by acourt of an expert witness. How do you feel about Evans now? [Internet link: http://www.fpp.co.uk/Legal/Penguin/experts/Evans/NZReportExtract.html] 10. have you read Norman Finkelstein's book, The Holocaust Industry. Ishe a racist and anti-Semite too? 11. you have argued in your books and articles that Jews should neverstoop to marrying outside their religion and race. Is that not racism in its purest and most evil form? 12. who paid your own multi-million dollar legal expenses, and why didthe British High Court, unusually, not allow you to reclaim them? 13. Judge Gray found in his Judgment that three of the statements youmade in your book against Mr Irving are in fact serious lies just as heclaimed (the Stockholm terrorist conference, the Hitler painting "above hisdesk", the stealing or damaging of the Goebbels diaries from the Moscowarchives. Have you removed them from the book's latest editions?) (Answer: You have not).What fraud? Stop trying to divert attention from whats important here. Also,how has David Irving got anything to do w/ 'reactivating the Nazi Party'?He's a historian - also used to be a very famous one too, until he realisedthe truth & stopped writing about the 'Holocaust', THAT was his crime. Ialso believed in it until I started looking at all these reports. Q: Ifthere was a 100% certainty it never happened, what evidence would stop youbelieving? A : NONE while you accept the staus quo.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_dQz86Ve8whttp://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=102884http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtCJtbSMiDw&feature=relatedhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3JI-axaRF4&feature=relatedGUTLESS WONDERS TAKE A LOOK AT SOME REAL GUTSY PEOPLE WHO ARENT ON THEIRKBEES AS SOON AS YOU MENTION JEW.the killing of Rachel Corrie a non Jewish American who was killed by the IDFby being run down by a bulldozer,and the driver then driving past the grieving peace vo;unteers with a smirkon his face.And apparently Christian america along with Christian Americans have not hada word to say.Just compare the difference below. http://www.thenausea.com/elements/thenotforgotten/rachel/index.html http://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/16/rafah.death/ One guy gets 10 years, the other gets a raise and promotion?? For killinga non jewish american? And gets to smirk about it?JEWS CANNOT DO ENOUGH FOR AN AMERICAN JEW? WOULD U SAY JEWS ARE USING NONJEWISH AMERICANS.http://www.jonathanpollard.org/1993/051693.htmCompounding the duplicity swirling around the case was the jurors'remarkable verdict: Mr. Nelson was indeed guilty of depriving his victim ofhis civil rights by stabbing him - but not by killing him. Thus, instead ofa possible life sentence, the murderer, with credit for time served, may bea free man in a matter of months.http://www.jlaw.com/Commentary/3dayriot.htmlIt is thus with intense interest that we watch as a federal jury in Brooklynhears the case of United States vs. Lemrick Nelson, Jr. and Charles Price --respectively, the accused killer of Yankel Rosenbaum, and the man chargedwith inciting the mob that pursued Rosenbaum. As Coalition goes to press,the trial has finally begun and the prosecution is presenting powerfulevidence against the two defendants http://www.thenausea.com/elements/thenotforgotten/rachel/index.html http://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/16/rafah.death/HOW ABOUT YOU BETRAYING THE USA AND IT'S ALLIES?????HOW ABOUT YOUR SHIPMATES 0- SORRY GOOD EHOUGH?http://www.ussliberty.com/challenge.htm - $10,000 challenge - The LibertyVeterans Association offers a $10,000 reward to anyone who can establish thetruth of A. Jay Cristol's claim: 1http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig/margolis12.htmlAt 0800 hrs, 8 June, 1967, eight Israeli recon flights flew over 'Liberty,'which was flying a large American flag. At 1400 hrs, waves of low-flyingIsraeli Mystere and Mirage-III fighter-bombers repeatedly attacked theAmerican vessel with rockets, napalm, and cannon. The air attacks lasted 20minutes, concentrating on the ship's electronic antennas and dishes. The'Liberty' was left afire, listing sharply. Eight of her crew lay dead, ahundred seriously wounded, including the captain, Commander WilliamMcGonagle.http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/sh-usn/usnsh-l/agtr5.htmOn the afternoon of 8 June 1967, while in international waters off the SinaiPeninsula, Liberty, though clearly marked as a U.S. Navy ship, was struck byIsraeli aircraft. After suffering damage and many personnel casualties fromgunfire, rockets and bombs, she was further attacked by three Israeli Navymotor torpedo boats. One torpedo hit her on the starboard side, forward ofthe superstructure, opening a large hole in her hull. In all, thirty-fourmen were killed in the attacks and nearly 170 wounded. Israel subsequentlyapologized for the incident, explaining that its air and naval forces hadmistaken the Liberty for a much smaller Egyptian Navy ship.December 12 - Twenty Arabs, five Jews and two British soldiers killed andthirty wounded in Jewish terrorist bomb attacks on buses in Haifa andRamleh, Palestine. British mandate to rule Palestine ends on 15 May 1948;state of Israel established.December 29 - Jewish Irgun terrorists throw grenades from passing taxi intocaf� near the Damascus gate, Jerusalem, Palestine, killing eleven Arabs andtwo British policemen.March 11Headquarters of the Jewish Agency, Jerusalem, Palestine, destroyed by Arabcar bomb killing thirteen and injuring eighty four.April 9Jewish Irgun terrorist group attacks Deir Yassim, Palestine, murdering twohundred and fifty four Arab women and children captured in the remains ofthe village.JEWS APPEAR TO BE THE ONLY ONES WITH VOICES, WHAT HAS HPPENED TO THEPREVIOUSLY VOCIFEROUS WASPS, and other religious and non religious groups.ONE JEWISH HOLLYWOOD MOTION PICTURE MOGULThe the Jewish controlled American media proclaimed Americans were stronglypro Jewish and very anti British. One Hollywood motion picture Moguldeclared in the British press that he had a holiday in his heart every timea British soldier was killed in Palestine. and large sections of theAmerican media echoed this sentiment.http://hnn.us/articles/832.html"The Palestinians are fighting with human suicide bombers, that's all theyhave. The Israelis . . . they've got one of the most powerful militarymachines in the world. The Palestinians have nothing."-- Ted Turner, Founder of CNN"I do not think that in his heart an Israeli would deny that, if your enemyhas taken land that is rightfully yours and occupied it, then not just yourenemy's army but his wife and son and daughter and servants and all who,under his protection, come to live and make their living on the stolen land,are aggressors. By their presence they aid and abet the occupation."-- Matthew Parris, Saturday Times of London, June 22, 2002"David Ben-Gurion never moved against the Irgun and the Stern Gang untilafter the state was established and secured, which is definitely not true inthe case of the Palestinian Authority. Essentially, the Israelis are askingthe Palestinians to do something they themselves refused to do." i-- Hussein Ibish, Communication director of the American ArabAnti-Discrimination Committeehttp://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/mufti.html Zionist Jewish supremacists really hate this kind of article, that is why"Hate Crimes" exist. To protect the highest criminals.Is this Politically Correct??[The very creation of Israel required an act of terror. In 1948, most of thenon-Jewish indigenous people were ethnically cleansed from the part ofPalestine which became Israel. This action was carefully planned. Withoutit, no state with a Jewish majority and character would have been possible.Since 1948, the "Israeli Arabs", those Palestinians who avoided expulsion,have suffered continuous discrimination. Indeed, many have been internallydisplaced, ostensibly for "security reasons", but really to acquire theirlands for Jews.]No, the Zionofreaks want to ban any history but what they write.Isn't it quite glaringly obvious that "The Holocaust" legends would fallapart without laws that make it illegal to question it?Isn't it glaringly obvious that 911 was the "Goy Holocaust" for America,that short circuits critical thinking and creates a victim mentallity thatjustifies all sorts of crimes against "evil"?Without "The Holocaust" and "911", the manipulators of the US and Israelwould not have been able to carry out their "War on Terror" terrorismagainst the Arabs.But with a public that thinks it is persecuted and under attack, anyatrocity is justified.The terrorists have won. For now.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UY-ZrwFwLQghttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_kv11fRvcM&feature=response_watch
mose
READ THIS AND YOU'LL SEE WHY PEOPLE ARE GOING TO STORMFRONT OR ANY OTHER
POLITICAL PARTY WHICH DOES NOT HAVE A POLICY OF APPROACHING JEWS ON THEIR
KNEES NO MATTER WHAT LIES THEY ARE TELLING.
AND WE HAVE A JOB AHEAD OF US . IT STARTED WITH ALLOWING THEM TO LIE ABOUT
THE HOLOCAUST AND HOW IT AFFECTED THEM.
WHEN IF YOU EXAMINE THE SITUATION THEY SUFFERED PIDDLING CASUALITIES EVEN IF
YOU TAKE THE BIGGEST FIGURE THEY CLAIM, AGAINST OUR NON JEWISH CIVILIAN AND
SERVICE CASUALTIES.
SO THAT IS WHY THEY HAVE INFLATED THE THEIR FIGURES BY ABOUT A MILLION. SO
BLOODY CHEEKY THAT IT WENT PAST. THEN THEY WORKED ON THE CLAMP LAW TO STOP
ANY EXAMINATION OF THE WARTIME FIGURES WITH THREAT OF JAIL.
WHAT AMAZES ME IS WHAT IS MOTIVATING OUR POLS, MONEY, OR JUST PLAIN
STUPIDITY
AND I HAVENT A CLUE HOW WE CAN GET BACK OUR MEDIA.
"B J Foster" <bjfo...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:hdgplv$7cd$2...@bjf.motzarella.org...
> mose wrote:
>> "Ruud66" <ruu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:4afadf40$0$1644$703f...@textnews.kpn.nl...
>>> "mose" <mo...@capp.com> wrote in message
>>> news:uyxKm.54009$ze1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> ...
>>>> WELL APPARENTLY THERE IS NO ONE TO TURN TO IF YOU DONT LIKE JEWISH
>>>> DOMINATION OF WHAT IS GOING ON IN THE WORLD AND ISRAEL IN OUR NAME AND
>>>> WITH OUR MONEY.
>
YOUR WORDS BJ NOT MINE , I DONT CARE ABOUT THE MIDEAST. JUST FUCK OF OUT OF
MY COUNTRY WITH YOUR LIES.
> Look at how those Jooz are taking over the Middle east eh?
http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=tW1-_JmXQt0&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYuWOi56Wq0&feature=related
> http://www.seraphicpress.com/images/state07.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8guH898FIUQ&feature=related
THERE YOU SICKO YOU WOULD NOT HAVE THE GUTS TO TALK STRAIGHT TO ANYONE. AND
YOUR SICK WAR WHICH IS JUST AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN. UNARMED AT THAT.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmEBPDZCWtM&feature=related
THATS THE ONLY WAY YOU'L TAKE OVER BY THE BACK STAB. JUST SICK THAT WE WERE
ALL FOOLED AND HELPED YOU ON ABSOLUTE BS.
READ BELOW.(BOTTOM)
Nine-eleven would not have occurred if the U.S. government had refused to
help Israel humiliate and destroy Palestinian society. Few express this
conclusion publicly, but many believe it is the truth. I believe the
catastrophe could have been prevented if any U.S. president during the
past 35 years had had the courage and wisdom to suspend all U.S. aid until
Israel withdrew from the Arab land seized in the 1967 Arab-Israeli war.
>
>>> This such old bogus that it aint funny again.
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion
>>>
>>> Get over yourself, Every muslim terrorist carries this around in a
>>> translated version.
AND IF EVERY NON JEW VISITED THE SITE THEY MIGHT BE SURPRISED HOW THIS FAKE
DOCUMENT DESCRIBES THE SITUATION SO ACCURATELY.
OF BY THE WAY WASNT IT ER JEWS AHO DISCOVERED THE DYING MAN EHO SOLVED THE
MYSTERYU?
YEAH I'D LIE ABOUT THE PROTOCOLS IF I WAS DYING AND I WAS OFFERED ENOUGH
MONEY FOR MY FAMILY.
AND OH THE TERRORISTS , WE KNOW WHAT STARTED THAT JUST NOT TAKEN IN BY POLS
BS, HOWEVER WELL THEY ARE PAID.
>>>
>>> R
>>>
>> ONLY PUT IT THERE FOR REFERENCE OF ANOTHER STRANGE CLAIM THAT WAS PROVED
>> TO BE A FAKE BY A DYING MAN???
>
> http://www.nazimorons.dont/want/to/get/the/message/
BROUHGT OUT THE OLD NAZI BIT , WELL IF CALLING A JEWISH ARSEHOLE AN ARSEHOLE
SO ALL YOU NON JEWS SUPPORTING THESE LAWS AND THE JEWS BETTER TAKE A GOOD
LING LOOK AT WHAT AND WHO THEY ARE SUPPORTING.
Non-Jewish Wartime camps
http://www.foitimes.com/internment/
http://www.foitimes.com/internment/Stories.htm
AND TURN YOUR SYMPATHY TO WHERE IT PROPERLY BELONGS INSTEAD OF BEING TAKEN
IN BY LIARS.
DO IT IN THE WINTER AND STICK IN A STACK OF EM PLUS THE TALMUDS. MAKE A
GREAT BLAZE. DO GREAT FOR BARBYS TO.
GIVES THE PORK A BIT OF EDGE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UY-ZrwFwLQg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_kv11fRvcM&feature=response_watch
HERE FRAUD IS WHAT DECENT PEOPLE , UNBIASED, NOT SLOBBERING OVER THE
THOUGHT OF HUGE REPARATIONS .
THE RED CROSS WAS THERE RIGHT THROUGH THE WAR, NON POLITICAL, NOT AFTER
MONEY, WELL THEY WERENT JEWISH OR WE WOULD HAVE HAD ANOTHER MOB WHINING
ABOUT HOW HARD THEY HAD IT.
NAFCASH TM presents
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/holohoax.htm
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article21878.htm
http://NEOCONZIONISTTHREAT.COM)
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/holohoax.htm
http://globalfire.tv/nj/03en/letters/2003oct_nbr01.htm
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/print.asp?ID=2735
http://www.rense.com/general69/factua.htm
http://www.von-waldenburg.com/reviews.html
http://www.icrc.org/Web/Eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/57JNX3
--
+
http://music.download.com/johnnyasia
+
http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecwar.html
� http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/ds9.htm
� http://www.rense.com/general45/zzo.htm
� http://www.heretical.com/mkilliam/wwii.html
Libraries, brothels, swimming??IN AUSWICHTZ???
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4138523842550891901#0h53m09s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dyBMuSYLGk
http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/history/zionism/news.php?q=1196891581
http://www.curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=888061
http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/1966
http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/130513
http://www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/htmlall/section_second_world_war?OpenDocumenthttp://www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/68zeb2?opendocumenthttp://www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/6ayg86Reportof the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activitiesduring theSecond World War, Geneva, 1948.You will find thousands of jewish fundedmuseums amd so calleduniversitiesthat supposedly have evidence , also thereports themselves havebeen contaminated by jewish academics and supporterscontinual injectionsthat the Red Cross did not see.The Red Cross is notpolitical or historical so keptrecords of it's actions,and if astrocitiesoccurred they recorded them just as they do today.And the only evidenceoffered by holocaust supporters is the usual suspectexaggerations fromreparation seeking jews castigated by honest honest jewsfor this horribleuse of what suffering there was during this period.Despite the suffering ofthe jews it was not as much as Europeans as a wholesuffered with over 5million imprisoned, a much hight number than the realnumber of jews . Andfree for anyone to investigate without fear ofimprisonment.Not to mentionthe disrupted lives of Europeans when their homes and townsbecame thebattlefields of WW2.To emphasize the determined efforts of the jews to stayin the limelight bypushing all other victims to the back while they bask inthe limelight , ina lot of cases undeservedly so.http://www.scrapbookpages.com/Poland/Crosses/Crosses.htmlAs an example thePolish who is the one country who had more (3 million -figures you canexamine without fear of harassment) wanted to put up crossesfor victims ,who were in there mostly for helping and supporting jews inPoland. Werecastigated and criticised by jewish groups claiming theremembrances shouldonly be for their victims, and not be over shadowed byChristianvictims.http://www.scrapbookpages.com/Poland/Crosses/Crosses.htmlhttp://www.holocaustforgotten.com/poland.htmhttp://www.holocaustforgotten.com/All thatcomes out clearly, whatever the reason that the jews were held incamps,there was great co operation by the jews themselves, this forced themto findexcuses for their behavior, and easiest was lying about thecruelties of theGermans that caused this co operation. Rather falls downwhen there is nogassing and if camps were simply holding camps.As their own leaders said.TheJewish ghetto police always had the option, she said, of "throwing offtheiruniforms and joining the rest of us" - a point that Yitzak Zuckerman,aleader of the Warsaw ghetto uprising, made in hismemoir.http://www.theexperiment.org/articles.php?news_id=2139There is not ashred of evidence, for example, that "a gas chamber was in the process ofbeing built at Dachau, but it was never completed." (See "The SecondLeuchter Report" by American gas chamber expert Fred Leuchter in The Journalof Historical Review, Fall 1990.) There is likewise no proof that "mentallyand physically handicapped people were killed" by gas at any of the four"institutions" Wiesenthal mentions. This US Army photo was taken at Dachauon April 30, 1945, one day after the camp's capture. It shows a GI standingin front of a door marked with a skull and crossbones and the words"Caution! Gas! Life danger! Do not open!" According to the official caption,"these chambers were used by Nazi guards for killing prisoners of theinfamous Dachau concentration camp." In fact, this is a small disinfectiongas chamber used for delousing clothes. It was never used to kill people.For several decades, this photo has been widely reproduced to help keepalive the notorious Dachau "gas chamber" myth. (US Army photo SC206194.)Besides the condensation below you can exam the various reviews ofthe REDCROSS covering WW2 during the time of the jews claimed astrocitiescommitedby the Germans.Inmates ReleasedMore than 200,000 prisoners weretransferred from Auschwitz to other camps,and about 8,000 were in the campwhen it was liberated by Soviet forces. Inaddition, about 1,500 prisonerswho had served their sentences werereleased, and returned to their homecountries. [16] If Auschwitz hadactually been a top secret exterminationcenter, would the Germans havereleased inmates who "knew" what was happeningthere?Himmler Orders Death RateReducedhttp://www.ihr.org/books/hoggan/21.htmlhttp://www.outlawjournalism.com/news/?p=5803http://www.rense.com/general69/factua.htmhttp://www.777healthproducts.com/07g.htmhttp://www.intellnet.org/resources/resistance/holocaust/04.htmhttp://www.icrc.ch/Web/Eng/siteeng0.nsf/iwpList418/359CC4EF8A1E5C72C1256B66005B2171A little hard to obtain a report that is not heavily influenced byjewishpressure to includE holocaust AS THEY WOULD LIKE ALL TO SEE IT..So youwill notice that holocaust is not denied just a quiet it was badetc.THEJEWS AND THE CONCENTRATION CAMPS:A FACTUAL APPRAISAL BY THE RED CROSS.Thereis one survey of the Jewish question in Europe during World WarTwo and theconditions of Germany's concentration camps which isalmost unique in itshonesty and objectivity, the three-volume Reportof the InternationalCommittee of the Red Cross on its Activitiesduring the Second World War,Geneva, 1948.This comprehensive account from an entirely neutralsourceincorporated and expanded the findings of two previous works:Documentssur l'activit� du CICR en faveur des civils d�tenus dans lescamps deconcentration en Allemagne 1939-1945 (Geneva, 1946), andInter Arma Caritas:the Work of the ICRC during the Second World War(Geneva, 1947). The team ofauthors, headed by Fr�d�ric Siordet,explained in the opening pages of theReport that their object, in thetradition of the Red Cross, had been strictpolitical neutrality, andherein lies its great value.The ICRC successfullyapplied the 1929 Geneva military convention inorder to gain access tocivilian internees held in Central and WesternEurope by the Germanyauthorities. By contrast, the ICRC was unable togain any access to theSoviet Union, which had failed to ratify theConvention. The millions ofcivilian and military internees held inthe USSR, whose conditions were knownto be by far the worst, werecompletely cut off from any internationalcontact or supervision.The Red Cross Report is of value in that it firstclarifies thelegitimate circumstances under which Jews were detainedinconcentration camps, i.e. as enemy aliens. In describing the twocategoriesof civilian internees, the Report distinguishes the secondtype as "Civiliansdeported on administrative grounds (in German,"Schutzh�ftlinge"), who werearrested for political or racial motivesbecause their presence wasconsidered a danger to the State or theoccupation forces" (Vol. 111, p. 73).These persons, it continues,"were placed on the same footing as personsarrested or imprisonedunder common law for security reasons." (P.74).TheReport admits that the Germans were at first reluctant to permitsupervisionby the Red Cross of people detained on grounds relating tosecurity, but bythe latter part of 1942, the ICRC obtained importantconcessions fromGermany. They were permitted to distribute foodparcels to majorconcentration camps in Germany from August 1942, and"from February 1943onwards this concession was extended to all othercamps and prisons" (Vol.111, p. 78). The ICRC soon establishedcontact with camp commandants andlaunched a food relief programmewhich continued to function until the lastmonths of 1945, letters ofthanks for which came pouring in from Jewishinternees.Red Cross Recipients Were JewsThe Report states that "As many as9,000 parcels were packed daily.From the autumn of 1943 until May 1945,about 1,112,000 parcels with atotal weight of 4,500 tons were sent off tothe concentration camps"(Vol. III, p. 80). In addition to food, thesecontained clothing andpharmaceutical supplies. "Parcels were sent to Dachau,Buchenwald,Sangerhausen, Sachsenhausen, Oranienburg,Flossenburg,Landsberg-am-Lech, Fl�ha, Ravensbr�ck, Hamburg-Neuengamme,Mauthausen,Theresienstadt, Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen, to camps near Viennaand inCentral and Southern Germany. The principal recipients wereBelgians,Dutch, French, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, Poles and statelessJews"(Vol. III, p. 83).In the course of the war, "The Committee was in aposition to transferand distribute in the form of relief supplies overtwenty millionSwiss francs collected by Jewish welfare organisationsthroughout theworld, in particular by the American Joint DistributionCommittee ofNew York" (Vol. I, p. 644). This latter organisation waspermitted bythe German Government to maintain offices in Berlin until theAmericanentry into the war. The ICRC complained that obstruction of theirvastrelief operation for Jewish internees came not from the Germans butfromthe tight Allied blockade of Europe. Most of their purchases ofrelief foodwere made in Rumania, Hungary and Slovakia.The ICRC had special praise forthe liberal conditions which prevailedat Theresienstadt up to the time oftheir last visits there in April1945. This camp, "where there were about40,000 Jews deported fromvarious countries was a relatively privilegedghetto" (Vol. III, p.75). According to the Report, "'The Committee'sdelegates were able tovisit the camp at Theresienstadt (Terezin) which wasused exclusivelyfor Jews and was governed by special conditions. Frominformationgathered by the Committee, this camp had been started as anexperimentby certain leaders of the Reich ... These men wished to give theJewsthe means of setting up a communal life in a town under theirownadministration and possessing almost complete autonomy. . . twodelegateswere able to visit the camp on April 6th, 1945. Theyconfirmed the favourableimpression gained on the first visit" (Vol.I, p . 642).The ICRC also hadpraise for the regime of Ion Antonescu of FascistRumania where the Committeewas able to extend special relief to183,000 Rumanian Jews until the time ofthe Soviet occupation. The aidthen ceased, and the ICRC complained bitterlythat it never succeeded"in sending anything whatsoever to Russia" (Vol. II,p. 62). The samesituation applied to many of the German camps after their"liberation"by the Russians. The ICRC received a voluminous flow of mailfromAuschwitz until the period of the Soviet occupation, when many oftheinternees were evacuated westward. But the efforts of the Red Crosstosend relief to internees remaining at Auschwitz under Soviet controlwerefutile. However, food parcels continued to be sent to formerAuschwitzinmates transferred west to such camps as Buchenwald andOranienburg.NoEvidence Of GenocideOne of the most important aspects of the Red CrossReport is that itclarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedlyoccurred inthe camps toward the end of the war. Says the Report: "In thechaoticcondition of Germany after the invasion during the final months ofthewar, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimedanincreasing number of victims. Itself alarmed by this situation, theGermanGovernment at last informed the ICRC on February 1st, 1945 ...In March 1945,discussions between the President of the ICRC andGeneral of the S.S.Kaltenbrunner gave even more decisive results.Relief could henceforth bedistributed by the ICRC, and one delegatewas authorised to stay in each camp..." (Vol. III, p. 83).Clearly, the German authorities were at pains torelieve the diresituation as far as they were able. The Red Cross are quiteexplicitin stating that food supplies ceased at this time due to theAlliedbombing of German transportation, and in the interests of internedJewsthey had protested on March 15th, 1944 against "the barbarousaerial warfareof the Allies" (Inter Arma Caritas, p. 78). By October2nd, 1944, the ICRCwarned the German Foreign Office of the impendingcollapse of the Germantransportation system, declaring thatstarvation conditions for peoplethroughout Germany were becominginevitable.In dealing with thiscomprehensive, three-volume Report, it isimportant to stress that thedelegates of the International Red Crossfound no evidence whatever at thecamps in Axis occupied Europe of adeliberate policy to exterminate the Jews.In all its 1,600 pages theReport does not even mention such a thing as a gaschamber. It admitsthat Jews, like many other wartime nationalities, sufferedrigours andprivations, but its complete silence on the subject ofplannedextermination is ample refutation of the Six Million legend. LiketheVatican representatives with whom they worked, the Red Cross founditselfunable to indulge in the irresponsible charges of genocidewhich had becomethe order of the day. So far as the genuine mortalityrate is concerned, theReport points out that most of the Jewishdoctors from the camps were beingused to combat typhus on the easternfront, so that they were unavailablewhen the typhus epidemics of 1945broke out in the camps (Vol. I, p. 204ff) - Incidentally, it isfrequently claimed that mass executions werecarried out in gaschambers cunningly disguised as shower facilities. Againthe Reportmakes nonsense of this allegation. "Not only the washing places,butinstallations for baths, showers and laundry were inspected bythedelegates. They had often to take action to have fixtures madelessprimitive, and to get them repaired or enlarged" (Vol. III, p. 594).NotAll Were InternedVolume III of the Red Cross Report, Chapter 3 (I. JewishCivilianPopulation) deals with the "aid given to the Jewish section ofthefree population," and this chapter makes it quite plain that by nomeansall of the European Jews were placed in internment camps, butremained,subject to certain restrictions, as part of the freecivilian population.This conflicts directly with the "thoroughness"of the supposed"extermination programme", and with the claim in theforged H�ss memoirs thatEichmann was obsessed with seizing "everysingle Jew he could lay his handson."In Slovakia, for example, where Eichmann's assistant Dieter Wislicenywasin charge, the Report states that "A large proportion of theJewish minorityhad permission to stay in the country, and at certainperiods Slovakia waslooked upon as a comparative haven of refuge forJews, especially for thosecoming from Poland. Those who remained inSlovakia seem to have been incomparative safety until the end ofAugust 1944, when a rising against theGerman forces took place. Whileit is true that the law of May 15th, 1942 hadbrought about theinternment of several thousand Jews, these people were heldin campswhere the conditions of food and lodging were tolerable, and wheretheinternees were allowed to do paid work on terms almost equal to thoseofthe free labour market" (Vol. I, p. 646).Not only did large numbers of thethree million or so European Jewsavoid internment altogether, but theemigration of Jews continuedthroughout the war, generally by way of Hungary,Rumania and Turkey.Ironically, post-war Jewish emigration fromGerman-occupiedterritories was also facilitated by the Reich, as in the caseof thePolish Jews who had escaped to France before its occupation. "TheJewsfrom Poland who, whilst in France, had obtained entrance permits totheUnited States were held to be American citizens by the Germanoccupyingauthorities, who further agreed to recognize the validity ofabout threethousand passports issued to Jews by the consulates ofSouth Americancountries" (Vol. I, p. 645).As future U.S. citizens, these Jews were held atthe Vittel camp insouthern France for American aliens. The emigration ofEuropean Jewsfrom Hungary in particular proceeded during the war unhinderedby theGerman authorities. "Until March 1944," says the. Red CrossReport,"Jews who had the privilege of visas for Palestine were free toleaveHungary" (Vol. I, p. 648). Even after the replacement of theHorthyGovernment in 1944 (following its attempted armistice with theSovietUnion) with a government more dependent on German authority,theemigration of Jews continued.The Committee secured the pledges of bothBritain and the UnitedStates "to give support by every means to theemigration of Jews fromHungary," and from the U.S. Government the ICRCreceived a messagestating that "The Government of the United States ... nowspecificallyrepeats its assurance that arrangements will be made by it forthecare of all Jews who in the present circumstances are allowed toleave"(Vol. I, p . 649).Biedermann agreed that in the nineteen instances that "DidSix MillionReally Die?" quoted from the Report of the InternationalCommittee ofthe Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War andInterArma Caritas (this includes the above material), it did so accurately.Aquote from Charles Biedermann (a delegate of the InternationalCommittee ofthe Red Cross and Director of the Red Cross'International Tracing Service)under oath at the Z�ndel Trial(February 9, 10, 11 and 12,1988).http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=2735http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/14645862&referer=brief_results ACTUALLY -- AND CONTRARY TO HISHIGHLY FLATTERING PUBLIC IMAGE -- THE RENOWNED "NAZI HUNTER" HAS AWELL-DOCUMENTED BUT LITTLE-KNOWN RECORD OF DECEIT, MENDACITY ANDPREVARICATION. SOME HIGHLIGHTS: Wiesenthal repeatedly lied about his allegedrole in locating Adolf Eichmann, was consistently wrong about Josef Mengele,and falsely accused Polish-American Frank Walus of having murdered Jews inPoland as a Gestapo official. Wiesenthal has absurdly charged that theGermans exterminated Jews in "electrocution chambers," and that theymanufactured bars of soap from the bodies of murdered Jews. His deceptionabout his own wartime activities prompted Austrian Chancellor Bruno Kreisky(himself of Jewish ancestry) to accuse the "Nazi hunter" of havingcollaborated with his wartime oppressors. (For details about Wiesenthal'srecord, see: M. Weber, "Simon Wiesenthal: Bogus Nazi Hunter," The Journal ofHistorical Review, Winter 1989-90.) THE CANADIAN JEWISH NEWS, Jan. 30, 1992Wannsee's importance rejected London (JTA) - An Israeli Holocaust scholarhas debunked the Wannsee Conference, at which top Nazi officials are said tohave gathered at a villa in a Berlin suburb in 1942 to draw the blueprintsof the "Final Solution." According to Prof. Yehuda Bauer (photo) of theHebrew University in Jerusalem, Wannsee was a meeting, "but hardly aconference", and "little of what was said there was executed in detail.""The public still repeats, time after time, the silly story that at Wannseethe extermination of the Jews was arrived at." "I have never held myselfout to be a Holocaust expert, nor have I written books about what is nowcalled the Holocaust." "I have done my best to prepare the case thatfollows, but I respectfully submit that I do not have any duty to become anexpert on the Holocaust, my Lord." "I have never claimed to be aHolocaust historian. As I have said, I have no written no book about theHolocaust. I have written no article about it. If I have spoken about it,it is usually because somebody has asked me a question, I have beenquestioned about it. On such occasions I have emphasised my lack ofexpertise and I have expatiated only upon those areas with which I amfamiliar." http://www.fpp.co.uk/Legal/Penguin/transcripts/day002.htm:"Now, you heard me say in my opening statement, Mr Rampton, that I am notan expert on the Holocaust. What I would now say would be a figure withoutany value whatsoever." "Q. [Rampton] What you do you say about Sobibor,Treblinka, Belzec and Chelmno?" "A. [Irving] Nothing at all. I am notan expert." RJ.Winston Churchill wrote a five volume history of World WarII and nevermentioned the holocaust. He never mentioned it because he knewthat theholocaust was just wartime propaganda and he did not want to sullywhat hehoped would be the definitive history of the war with propaganda thatcommonsense alone could refute. I could go on but the evidence I speak ofisavailable to The Jubilee readers from many patriotic sources even thoughitis still widely censored by America's media and libraries.I onceconsidered the battle over the holocaust as a great political trumpcardallowing us to take back the moral high ground on the censorship issuefromthe left. But I see now that it is much more important than that.Theholocaust is qualitatively different than the silly lies nations telltheircitizens to get them so fired up they will send their children to dieinforeign wars. The holocaust is not pre-war propaganda. It ispost-warpropaganda.Why do we need post World War II propaganda? BecauseWorld War II was thegreatest human catastrophe in two thousand years for theAryan peoples andwe "gentiles" must not be allowed to see the truth. It wasmore than theslaughter of our racial kinsmen and the destruction of ourracial homeland.World War II was the most significant crossroads theChristian nations havefaced since Herman faced the legions of Rome in theforests of Teutonberg2,000 years ago. But Herman won the battle ofTeutonberg Wald. The Christianworld lost World War II. We lost because wecame to a crossroads and wentthe wrong way.http://www.nafcash.com/Lest youthink there must be some truth to the alleged Treblinka holocaust NAFCASH TMis offering a $250,000.00 REWARD For locating JUST ONE of the alleged "HUGEMASS GRAVES" of Treblinka NAFCASH TM presents THE TREBLINKA CRIME SCENEINVESTIGATION CHALLENGE TM You must scientifically - forensically prove thegrave's EXACT location,its EXACT dimensions and its EXACT volumetricdensity. The cremated remains must total AT LEAST one percent of the allegedmassmurder. JUST ONE MASS GRAVE! - JUST ONEPERCENT!http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/holohoax.htm HOW TO KEEP ACADEMICSQUIET The Real Issue Is Israel's Human Rights Record: A statement by NormanG. Finkelstein upon publication of Beyond Chutzpah Professor AlanDershowitz of Harvard University is currently best known for his advocacyof the "most excruciating" torture against terrorist suspects such as a"needle being shoved under the fingernails." The alleged purpose of thistorture is to extract a truthful confession but its real consequence, ashuman rights organizations have pointed out, is to produce whateverstatements are necessary to end the suffering.For 15 months Dershowitz hasapplied a variant of this truth-seeking technique -- less physicallypainful but no less excruciating -- to prospective publishers of BeyondChutzpah, which offers a critical examination of Israel's human rightsrecord and Dershowitz's defense of it. Enlisting one of the most powerfullaw firms in the country after his personal initiatives provedunsuccessful, Dershowitz has repeatedly threatened to bankrupt highlyrespected publishers with litigation if they didn't cancel publication ofmy book. He could then proclaim that the cancellation confirmed the "truth"that Beyond Chutzpah didn't meet scholarly standards. Dershowitz justifiedthese blackmail tactics on the ground that Beyond Chutzpah libels him. Yet,when I first began to expose his gross scholarly misconduct, Dershowitzpublicly declared at UCLA (on 21 October 2003) that he wouldn't respondwith a libel action because he believed "so strongly in the FirstAmendment and full freedom of speech." Ironically, just as he wasthreatening my publishers with expensive and time-consuming lawsuits,Dershowitz denounced Holocaust denier David Irving, who had sued DeborahLipstadt for libel, with these words: "Before Irving lost his case [againstLipstadt], several publishers had refused to issue books critical ofIrving, out of fear of his bringing expensive and time-consuming lawsuits.That was a chilling of free speech" (Afterword to Lipstadt's History onTrial; his emphasis). My publisher, University of California Press, wasunderstandably at great pains to fend off a potential lawsuit byDershowitz; for an academic publisher the associated costs would have beenruinous, to the point of making certain victory meaningless. On occasionour relationship became strained and at one point it appeared as if we hadreached an impasse. However, through the skillful mediation of Nationmagazine senior editor Roane Carey (who was the freelance editor of BeyondChutzpah) and others, a satisfactory compromise was reached that protectedthe interests of both publisher and author, and, most importantly,preserved the integrity of the book. I would like personally to extend myheartfelt thanks to all who supported me and the press during thisdifficult period."Another Frenchman, Paul Rassinier, a pre-war communist andlater asocialist, had been a member of the French Resistance. He wasarrested andinterned in concentration camps, among them Buchenwald. In 1948he publisheda book Crossing the Line, in which he argued that people mighthave beenkilled in concentration camps, but that the perpetrators had actedon theirown, not on orders from headquarters.AS WITH ABU GRAIB."The savingof the Jews in Europe did not figure at the head of the list ofpriorities ofthe ruling class. It was the foundation of the State which wasprimordial intheir eyes." "The masses of Jews from Hungary's ghettos obediently boardedthedeportation trains without knowing their fate. They were full ofconfidence in the false information that they were being transferredtoKenyermeze.The truth is that somewhere between 700,000 and 1,500,000people died inGerman work camps in 1944 and 1945. Most of them were Jews.Many were not.Most of them died in the last six months of the war fromdisease and hungercaused by America's bombing of Germany and subsequentdestruction of herinfrastructure. There were some atrocities but very few.Few people realizethat the International Red Cross had a field office inAuschwiz from 1942 untilthe end of the war. That office never reported orrecorded any atrocities (Several years agointernational Jewry forced the RedCross to apologize to the Jews -apologize for not seeing something thatnever happened.)Clearly, the German authorities were at pains to relieve thedire situationas far as they were able. The Red Cross are quite explicit instating thatfood supplies ceased at this time due to the Allied bombing ofGermantransportation, and in the interests of interned Jews they hadprotested onMarch 15th, 1944 against "the barbarous aerial warfare of theAllies" (InterArma Caritas, p. 78). By October 2nd, 1944, the ICRC warnedthe GermanForeign Office of the impending collapse of the Germantransportationsystem, declaring that starvation conditions for peoplethroughout Germanywere becoming inevitable.A Jewish woman named Marika Frankarrived at Auschwitz-Birkenau from Hungaryin July 1944, when 25,000 Jewswere supposedly gassed and cremated daily.She likewise testified after thewar that she heard and saw nothing of "gaschambers" during the time she wasinterned there. She heard the gassingstories only later. [15]InmatesReleasedMore than 200,000 prisoners were transferred from Auschwitz to othercamps,and about 8,000 were in the camp when it was liberated by Sovietforces. Inaddition, about 1,500 prisoners who had served their sentenceswerereleased, and returned to their home countries. [16] If Auschwitzhadactually been a top secret extermination center, would the Germanshavereleased inmates who "knew" what was happening there?Himmler OrdersDeath Rate Reducedhttp://www.ifamericansknew.org/http://www.ussliberty.org/"Asgard"<asg...@home.net wrote inmessagenews:zZadnTJAIc9c0_DY...@giganews.com...� What aload of emotive old bollocks, bullshit and lies. The narrator states theinmates were "starving' at Bergen Belsen, yet the vast majority of theinmates look positively fat and shiny. He goes on to say those dead, haddied of starvation, yet earlier stated they'd not eaten for only 6 days.The images of the dead showed mainly emaciated corpses, nothing like thepeople still moving around. If they'd died of "starvation", why had thevasst majority of the inmates not suffered the same fate. Why, indeed wasitonly the corpses which were emaciated. What I found particularlyintersting, was significant incidence ofpetachiae on the bodies of thedead. THIS IS A CLASSIC SIGN OF EPIDEMIC TYPHUS. The documentary was madein 2005, by a yid, and I note they're stillusing the mythical 4millionfigure for deaths at Auschsitz. Haven't correctedthe script. They alsostate, quite clearly, there were 6m jewish deaths in camps. No mention ofthe supposed Einzatzgroupen. The entire documentary is a farcical attemptheighten the victimhoodstatus of yids. Any of the experts like tocomment? Keenan? You're an expert oneverything. Gord, likewise. McFey? Gotany answers chaps? I look forward to your attempts to shoot this onedown.Russian troops marched into Berlin on April 24, 1945, they found 800Jewsalive and well in Berlin's Jewishhospital.http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/april/21/newsid_3560000/3560175.stm51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration With theNazishttp://www.wrmea.com/archives/Sept_2004/0409086.html"Topaz"<mars...@hotmail.com wrote inmessagenews:pklr449roj8r6c7uf...@4ax.com... "The orthodoxholocaust story can not possibly be defended with rational argumentsbecause its absurdity is overwhelming. We are asked to believe in the fatamorgana of a vast slaughter in killing factories which left no traceswhatsoever - no documents, no bones, no teeth, no ashes - nothing! We arefurther asked to believe that the Allies, who had a large network ofinformers all over Europe and a spy in the German leadership (AdmiralCanaris, the head of the German intelligence), did not become aware ofthis gigantic genocide until the end of the war, for if they had knownabout the mass murder, they would have acted to stop it. Finally, we areasked to believe that the Jews in Poland, the epicentre of the holocaust,did not know anything about the Auschwitz gas chambers as late as inAugust 1944, otherwise the Jews from the Lodz ghetto would not have goneto Auschwitz voluntarily - which is precisely what they did, as related byRaul Hilberg in his standard work about the holocaust (Die Vernichtung dereuropaeischen Juden, p. 543/544). As the Zionist-controlled system of the"Western democracies" is woefully unable to counter the revisionists witharguments, it resorts to censorship and brute force in order to silencethe dangerous heretics. And the Jews are gradually transforming theholocaust into a religion. This is a very clever strategy, for as RobertFaurisson aptly remarks, one cannot refute a religion with scientificarguments. Thus, the holocaust museums and holocaust monuments spreadinglike mushrooms all over America and Europe are really temples of the newreligion, whereas professional "holocaust survivors" such as Elie Wieselare the priests of the new religion. To prove this assertion, we only haveto quote Wiesel himself: "The Holocaust is a holy mystery, the secret ofwhich is limited to the circle of the priesthood of survivors" (PeterNovick, The Holocaust in American Life, 1999, p. 211, 212, retranslatedfrom the German). Another high priest of the holocaust cult, SimonWiesenthal, goes even further: "When each of us comes before the SixMillion, we will be asked what we did with our lives... I will say: I didnot forget you" (Simon Wiesenthal in Response, Vol. 20, Nr. 1). Nocritical questions about the holocaust are allowed because they are ablasphemy: They cause immense distress to the eternal victims ofpersecution, the Jews, and are an attempt to whitewash National Socialism - the most evil ideology of all times which made the holocaustpossible! In today's Germany, it is even considered inadmissible tocompare the holocaust with the atrocities of communist tyrants such asStalin or Cambodian dictator Pol Pot because this is regarded as a"relativisation" and "trivialization" of the worst crime in history.French Zionist propagandist Claude Lanzmann, the producer of a long andunspeakably dull film about the holocaust (the title of this film is Shoa,the Hebrew word for "catastrophe", which is often used by Jews as asynonym for "holocaust") makes no effort to conceal that the holocaustcult is to replace Christianity: "If Auschwitz is something other than ahorror of history, then Christianity totters in its foundations. Christ isthe Son of God, who went to the end of the humanely endurable, where heendured the cruellest suffering. (...) If Auschwitz is true, then there isa human suffering with which that of Christ simply cannot be compared.(...) In this case, Christ is false, and salvation will not come from him.(...) Auschwitz is the refutation of Christ." (Les temps modernes, Paris,December 1993, p. 132, 133.) Nowadays, a large percentage of the Jews donot believe in God any more, but virtually all of them believe in the SixMillion. The Zionist leadership cunningly exploits the holocaust to unitethe World's Jews by keeping them in a constant state of hysteria andpersecution mania, insinuating that only if the Jews stick together willthey be able to ban the threat of a new holocaust. It goes without sayingthat very few Non-Jews are willing to embrace the murky holocaustreligion. While the overwhelming majority of people in the West stillbelieve that the official holocaust version is essentially true (even ifthey suspect that the figures might me somewhat inflated), they arethoroughly fed up with the eternal lamentation about Jewish victims andJewish suffering. They simply don't want to hear it any more. In Germany,opinion polls showed that a vast majority of the population was againstthe planned holocaust monument in Berlin (which not a single major party,not a single leading politician and not a single big newspaper dared tooppose). Privately, the politicians are probably as profoundly disgustedwith the endless holocaust litany as the rest of the population, but theycannot possibly afford to let the revisionists win because this wouldshatter the very foundations of the "democratic" system to which they owntheir careers and their wealth... The ultimate weapon against Zionism andthe state of Israel At the end of the year 2000, Israel is a besiegedcountry, but from the military point of view, it is still vastly superiorto its neighbours, and it enjoys the unconditional support of the UnitedStates. Should any of the Islamic states grow strong enough to seriouslythreaten Israel, it would most probably be attacked and militarilyannihilated by America. Russia is not likely to risk a confrontation withthe USA for the sake of the Palestinians. We can certainly admire thebravery of the Palestinians resistance fighters who are willing tosacrifice their lives to liberate their homeland from the alien intruders,but realistically, they have no chance to win. The Palestinians havestones and slings. The Israelis have helicopters and tanks. You can'tdestroy helicopters and tanks with stones and slings. When fightingone's enemy, one should always look for his weakest spot. The weakest spotof Israel, its Achilles heel, is the holocaust lie to which it owes itsexistence. The revisionists can give the adversaries of Israel andinternational Zionism a terrible weapon. It is quite true that manyrevisionists are by no means guided by political considerations. Some ofthem - Carlo Mattogno is a good example - are only motivated byintellectual curiosity: They want to ascertain what really happened to theJews during the Second World War. But even if revisionism is not apolitical movement, its political implications are tremendous. Therevisionists are endeavouring to find out the truth, and truth is thedeadliest enemy of Israel and international Jewry. Thus, the revisionistsobjectively work against Israel and Zionism, even if subjectively theirgoals are often purely scientific and devoid of any political ambition.This is, of course, the reason why they are persecuted and their booksburnt in more and more countries. In view of the total Jewish mediacontrol and the ever-growing anti-revisionist repression in many Westerncountries, it is very difficult indeed to achieve a revisionistbreakthrough. We revisionists are facing an uphill struggle which can onlypartly be explained by our total lack of financial resources. Fortunatelythe internet, which the Jews are unable to censure, has greatly improvedour possibilities to make the results of our research known to the World,but all the same, we should not cherish naive illusions: Not every citizenof the Western world who is informed about the revisionist arguments willautomatically become revisionist and anti-Zionist. The average person inthe West - and particularly in Germany - has been so thoroughlybrainwashed that a sudden exposure to the truth can provoke a nervousbreakdown or stomach cramps. I have repeatedly witnessed this myself.Other people would gladly accept the truth about the holocaust, but asthey know that even the slightest suspicion of revisionism leads to socialostracism, economic ruin and legal persecution, they understandably prefernot to get involved. However, if we want to win the war against those whomone of my Russian friends called "the enemies of God and mankind".. Thelogical consequence of all this is that those countries which areauthentically anti-Zionist and real friends of the oppressed Palestinianpeople should make the breakthrough of holocaust revisionism theirforemost priority. A tank costs millions of dollars, yet one soldier candestroy it with a single missile. The revisionists can provideanti-Zionist freedom fighters with a weapon not even a thousand missilescan destroy." http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.comhttp://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.htmlWell the claim that they were fighting fora homeland might float, howeverif the are still more concerned about jewishaims and dreams than weighingthis of with the requirements of the other nonjewish citizens in thecountries in which they reside, then obviously the nonjewish citizens havereason to object and ignore their claims at the expenseof their own wealth, lives and wellbeing.We have already paid a top pricefor assisting jews in their selfish selfishself centred aims.Casualties inWW2Not including the documented 5 million non Jewish in concentrationcampswho far out numbered the suspected true number of Jewish victims. Andthisis without lies and exaggerations about non jewish cassualities.SovietUnion 25,568,000China 11,324,000Germany 7,060,000Poland 6,850,000Japan1,806,000Yugoslavia 1,700,000Rumania 985,000France 810,000Austria525,000Italy 410,000Great Britain 388,000USA 295,000Holland 250,000Belgium85,000Finland 79,000Canada 42,000India 36,000Australia 29,000Albania28,000Spain 22,000Bulgaria 21,000New Zealand 12,000Norway 10,000South Africa9,000Luxembourg 5,000Denmark 4,000TOTAL 58,353,000The Jewish ghetto policealways had the option, she said, of "throwing offtheir uniforms and joiningthe rest of us" - a point that Yitzak Zuckerman,a leader of the Warsawghetto uprising, made in hismemoir.http://www.theexperiment.org/articles.php?news_id=2139Without Jewishco operation through the zionists the Germans would neverhave had theresources to herd the Jews into the various camps. And thezionists made itimpossible for the underground to trust the jews.Like elsewhere, the onlypeople who had the information and the ear of thefrightened Jewishpopulation were the Judenrat. In this case the Judenratcomprised mainly theZionist Federation members. Without their help the SS,with 19 officers andless than 90 men, plus a few hundred Hungarian police,could not havecollected and controlled a million Jews, when they did noteven know theirwhereabouts.So no reluctance amongst jews as they knew that they were simplybeingencamped._____________________________________THE PROBLEM BEING THATTHE ONLY WILD AND WEIRD ACCOUNTS OF UNTRAMMELLEDHORROR CAME FROM ONLYJEWS.NON JEWS COMPLETELY CONTRADICTED THE WILD STORIES FROM THECONTRACTINGMUSCLES TO THE SOAP AND TATTOOED LAMPSHADES, ALL BS.During WorldWarII, Rassinier was a highly decorated member of the FrenchResistance. InOctober of 1943 he was arrested by the Gestapo for variousactivitiesincluding the smuggling of Jewish refugees over the Franco-Swissborder took2 years to publish his book because of persistent resistanceby the jewishclique.http://www.ihr.org/books/rassinier/debunking1-0.htmlhttp://www.ihr.org/books/hoggan/A4.htmlhttp://www.fpp.co.uk/bookchapters/articles/HowWarsBegin.htmlhttp://www.anti-rev.org/textes/VidalNaquet92a/part-6.htmlhttp://www.alibris.com/search/books/author/Paul_RassinierBut the huge money involved inthe reparations won out and we have anothertrue report labeled as a revisionagainst the lies that were spread andapparently plenty of jewish and jewishsupporters willing to jump on thebandwagon and build up the stories, supplyall sorts of shonky evidence tosupport the lies.And of course the jewishmoney made it very iffy for experts to testifybecause of the constantarttacks , false ads on the net. in books and byevery jew and his mother ofall ages whose chances of being either witnessesof involved were/are slimmerbut apparently the courts i n Germany also helpthe cause of falsifyingevidence.Although even honest jews could not sway the lies and FinklesteinlikeRassinier, Harry ElmerBarnes(http://www.amazon.com/Perpetual-Peace-Harry-Elmer-Barnes/dp/0939484013http://www.courts.fsnet.co.uk/harryelmerbarnes.htm and of course youwillfind the jewish supporters here labelling him as a revisionist becausehedid not agree with theirversionhttp://www.revisionists.com/revisionists/barnes.htmlhttp://tmh.floonet.net/articles/barnes.html ), Charles A.Beard(http://www.questia.com/read/6153679?title=Cross%20Currents%20in%20Europe%20To-Dayhttp://www.questia.com/SM.qst ) , HermanHesse(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Complete_Fairy_Tales_of_Hermann_Hesse ) confession is from Hoess. Here are the details: "In the introductionto Death Dealer [Buffalo: Prometheus, 1992], the historian Steven Paskulywrote: "Just after his capture in 1946, the British Security Police wereable to extract a statement from Hoess by beating him and filling him withliquor." Paskuly was reiterating what Rupert Butler and Bernard Clarke hadalready described. In 1983, Rupert Butler published an unabashed memoir(Legions of Death, Hamlyn: London) describing in graphic detail how, overthree days, he and Clarke and other British policemen managed to tortureHoess into making a "coherent statement." According to Butler [Legions ofDeath, p. 237], he and the other interrogators put the boots to Hoess themoment he was captured. For starters, Clarke struck his face four times toget H�ess to reveal his true identity. <quote The admission suddenlyunleashed the loathing of Jewish sergeants in the arresting party whoseparents had died in Auschwitz following an order signed by H�ss. Theprisoner was torn from the top bunk, the pajamas ripped from his body. Hewas then dragged naked to one of the slaughter tables, where it seemed toClarke the blows and screams were endless. Eventually, the Medical Officerurged the Captain: "Call them off, unless you want to take back a corpse."A blanket was thrown over H�ss and he was dragged to Clarke's car, wherethe sergeant poured a substantial slug of whisky down his throat. H�sstried to sleep. Clarke thrust his service stick under the man's eyelidsand ordered in Geffnan: "Keep your pig eyes open, you swine." For thefirst time H�ss trotted out his oft-repeated justification: "I took myorders from Himmler. I was a soldier in the same way as you are a soldierand we had to obey orders." The party arrived back at Heide around threein the morning. The snow was swirling still, but the blanket was tornfrom H�ss and he was made to walk completely nude through the prisonyard to his cell. </quote An article in the British newspaper WrexhamLeader [Mike Mason, "In a cell with a Nazi war criminal-We kept him awakeuntil he confessed," October 17, 1986] following the airing of a TVdocumentary on the case of Rudolf Hoess included eyewitness recollectionsby Ken Jones: <quote Mr. Ken Jones was then a private with the FifthRoyal Horse Artillery stationed at Heid[e] in Schleswig-Holstein. "Theybrought him to us when he refused to cooperate over questioning abouthis activities during the war. He came in the winter of 1945/6 and wasput in a small jail cell in the barracks," recalls Mr. Jones. Two othersoldiers were detailed with Mr. Jones to join H�ss in his cell to helpbreak him down for interrogation. "We sat in the cell with him, night andday, armed with axe handles. Our job was to prod him every time he fellasleep to help break down his resistance," said Mr. Jones. When H�sswas taken out for exercise he was made to wear only jeans and a cottonshirt in the bitter cold. After three days and nights without sleep,H�ss finally broke down and made a full confession to the authorities.</quote The confession Hoess signed was numbered document NO-1210; laterrevamped, as document PS-3868, which became the basis for an oraldeposition Hoess made for the IMT on April 15, 1946, a month after it hadbeen extracted from him by torture... Since what people confess to afterthey have been captured by the Communists and their liberal comrades isnot proof of anything, this leaves only the stories of survivors. Thesecontradict each other and not believable. One professional survivor saidthat he could tell if the Germans were gassing German Jews or Polish Jewsby the color of the smoke. The fact that there are so many "survivors"is not proof of an extermination plan. There may be six million survivors.Just about every Jew that is old says he is a survivor.Frederick Bausman(http://www.thenation.com/archive/detail/13677001 ) allthe honest teachersand historians were labelled nazi , which of course theywerent, but if youpoint out the lies the only support you are going to getis from anti semiticgroups.And of course there is the decent honest jew tired of the lies.Astatement by Norman G. Finkelstein upon publication of BeyondChutzpahhttp://www.nowar-paix.ca/nowar/forum/6973http://666ismoney.com/HolocaustAds.htmlI, Raquel Baranow am a Grad Student of Holocaust Denial. Thereare personswith PhD's in various fields whoalso deny the 6 million canard.The best evidence is forensic. Untilrecently, there was never aforensicexamination of the alleged murder weapon (gas chambers). Demographicfiguresare incomplete. After the fallof East Europe to communism, many ofthe millions of Jews who fled Polandinto the Soviet Union or ended upbehindthe Iron Curtain changed their names to assimilate, many civiliansdied inthe war, many died in theconcentration camps of louse-born typhus. DuringWorld War One, two millioncivilians in the Soviet Union diedof typhus. Manydied in Stalin's gulags.Yad Vashem,(http://www.yadvashem.org/wps/portal/IY_HON_Welcome)a HolocaustDocumentationCenter in Israel has a database of 3,000,000 alleged victimsofNaziextermination. But as you can seeHERE(http://666ismoney.com/YadVashem.html) (my maiden name, Friedemann),nearlyevery name is listed at leasttwice, some as many as fivetimes!http://www.yadvashem.org/lwp/workplace/IY_HON_WelcomeYad Vashem's3,000,000 "Holocaust victims" database lists nearlyeveryone twice. Some asmany at five times. Anyone, includingyou can submit a "Page ofTestimony".And of course we have lists duplicated, unconfirmed, but 3maccording to ourusual jewish/Zionist sources.Put your name in, you might bemissing out on reparations.Has been improvements since this, numbers stillvery dicey.Name Town District RegionCountry Bday SourceFriedemann AdolfBerlin Berlin Berlin Germany1879 list of victims from GermanyFriedemannAdolf Berlin Berlin Berlin Germany1879 list of deportation fromBerlinFriedemann Adolf Berlin Berlin Berlin Germany1905 list of deportationfrom BerlinIt is forensically impractical or impossible to exterminatemillions withlouse disinfestant (hydrogen cyanide gas)or diesel exhaust asalleged by malicious "witnesses" or torturedconfessors. There are no writtenorders forextermination. Aerial reconnaissance photographs of theconcentration campsshow no smoke and flamesbelching from the crematoria andpyres as alleged. The photos and recordsshow there was not enough cokeorcrematoria to cremate millions of corpses. The "witnesses" andconfessorslied about how many minutes it takesto cremate a corpse. Dieselexhaust does not contain significant amount ofcarbon monoxide to kill ahuman. Ifthe Nazis wanted to kill millions they could have driven the coalfiredtrain into a tunnel or quonset hut and gassed'em with the exhaust fromthe locomotive or used the exhaust from thecrematoria. At Auschwitz, duringa typhusepidemic, up to 300 people died per day, hence the crematoria,shaving ofheads and requisitions for tons ofZyklon B louse disinfestant. HCNis a very dangerous, impractical, messymethod forextermination.http://www.vho.org/The Holocaust Controversy A Case for openDebateThe Gas Chambers are a fraud, a tourist attraction, slander,demonizing,impractical/impossible, maliciousatrocity propaganda spread bythe communists, who hated Hitler andperpetrated by Jews, who werealwayslooking for ways to get to the lands of milk and money. The Jewshaveextorted billions from the US Treasury,Germany, Swiss banks andinsurance companies on account of the Holohoaxfraud. The Holohoax alsomakesthose who fought Hitler feel like they did something good fightingthedemon, Hitler instead of letting Hitler takeon Stalin alone.A "liberal"person has an open mind. A bigot is irrational and obstinate.And then wehave the honest red cross with no ulterior motives.The New Blasphemyby TomBlairNews Editor, The JubileeThere was a time when a man did not blasphemeGod in America. There weresevere social proscriptions against it. Somecommunities even had lawsagainst blasphemy. Well blasphemy is still a greatsin in America and maysoon be a crime again. But sadly America has a new godand so, a newblasphemy.Let me here commit the new blasphemy while it isstill legal. What we knowas the "holocaust" is largely war-time propaganda.Propaganda that, unlikemost war-time propaganda, was not quietly forgotten.Instead it hascontinued; grown more fantastic, more hateful, and moredangerous toquestion every year since 1945.The truth is that somewherebetween 700,000 and 1,500,000 people died inGerman work camps in 1944 and1945. Most of them were Jews. Many were not.Most of them died in the lastsix months of the war from disease and hungercaused by America's bombing ofGermany and subsequent destruction of herinfrastructure. There were someatrocities but very few. Few people realizethat the International Red Crosshad a field office in Auschwiz from 1942until the end of the war. Thatoffice never reported or recorded anyatrocities (Several years agointernational Jewry forced the Red Cross toapologize to the Jews - apologizefor not seeing something that neverhappened.)� WARNING To People inAustria; Belgium; France; Germany; Israel; Spain and Switzerland. Youcan be fined, imprisoned or both for discussing the topics setforth in this article.It was only after I moved to the Los Angeles areaseveral years ago that Irealized that many people were not aware thatmillions of victims of theHolocaust were NOT Jewish. Outside the Polishcommunity, I heard very littlemention about the five million non-Jewishvictims -- usually referred to as"the othersSubject: Israeli rabbi backsJewish suicide attacks Organization: Copyright1997 by Reuters Lines: 43Date: Tue, 8 Apr 1997 9:22:44 PDT Kidnappings, Beatings, Murders andHangingsAttacks by the Irgun and Stern Gang - In 1944, with the end the warinsight, Irgun, now under the leadership of Menachem Begin , the futurePrimeMinister of Israel 1977-83, began to attack the British administrationinPalestine, starting with bomb attacks on the immigration offices,taxoffices and police stations.http://www.britains-smallwars.com/Palestine/kidnap.htmThe Americans werestrongly pro Jewish and very anti British. One Hollywoodmotion picture Moguldeclared in the British press that he had a holiday inhis heart every time aBritish soldier was killed in Palestine. and largesections of the Americanmedia echoed this sentiment.November 27 -Eight British soldiers killed inbomb attack on police station Jerusalem,Palestine, in Jewish Irgun terroristattack.http://www.cdiss.org/terror_1940s.htmJuly 22 - Ninety people killedand forty five wounded after Jewishterrorists blow up the King David Hotelin Jerusalem, Palestine, which washome to British government and militaryoffices. The terrorists held workersat pistol point while they planted theexplosives in the basement of thehotel.July 12 - Jewish Irgun terroristskidnap and then hang two British Armysergeants. The terrorists were tryingto secure the release of three Irgunmembers who had been sentenced to deathby the British authorities inPalestine.September 29 - Jewish Irgunterrorists bomb police station in Haifa,Palestine, killing four British andfour Arab policemen, as well as two Arabcivilians. Forty six peopleinjured.http://forum.cari.com.my/archiver/?tid-117974.htmlDecember 4,1948New Palestine PartyVisit of Menachem Begin and Aims of PoliticalMovement DiscussedTO THE EDITORS OF THE NEW YORK TIMES:Among the mostdisturbing political phenomena of our times is the emergencein the newlycreated state of Israel of the "Freedom Party" (Tnuat Haherut),a politicalparty closely akin in its organization, methods, politicalphilosophy andsocial appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties. It was formedout of themembership and following of the former Irgun Zvai Leumi, aterrorist,right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine.Attack on Arab VillageAshocking example was their behavior in the Arab village of Deir Yassin.Thisvillage, off the main roads and surrounded by Jewish lands, had takenno partin the war, and had even fought off Arab bands who wanted to use thevillageas their base. On April 9 (THE NEW YORK TIMES), terrorist bandsattacked thispeaceful village, which was not a military objective in thefighting, killedmost of its inhabitants - 240 men, women, and children -and kept a few ofthem alive to parade as captives through the streets ofJerusalem. Most ofthe Jewish community was horrified at the deed, and theJewish Agency sent atelegram of apology to King Abdullah of Trans-Jordan.But the terrorists, farfrom being ashamed of their act, were proud of thismassacre, publicized itwidely, and invited all the foreign correspondentspresent in the country toview the heaped corpses and the general havoc atDeir Yassin.The Deir Yassinincident exemplifies the character and actions of theFreedom Party.(signed)Isidore Abramowitz, Hannah Arendt, Abraham Brick, Rabbi JessurunCardozo,Albert Einstein, Herman Eisen, M.D., Hayim Fineman, M. Gallen, M.D.,H.H.Harris, Zelig S. Harris, Sidney Hook, Fred Karush, Bruria Kaufman, IrmaL.Lindheim, Nachman Maisel, Symour Melman, Myer D. Mendelson, M.D., HarryM.Orlinsky, Samuel Pitlick, Fritz Rohrlich, Louis P. Rocker, RuthSager,Itzhak Sankowsky, I.J. Schoenberg, Samuel Shuman, M. Znger, IrmaWolpe,Stefan WolpeNew York, Dec. 2,1948[/quote]http://comment.independent.co.uk/commentators/article1197235.ece"B.H. Cramer" <benj...@yourservice.com wrote inmessagenews:4MKdnSvnVuD_lmrV...@giganews.com... "Jason P"<jas...@REMOVE.gmail.com wrote in messagenews:xY6dndIdJenal2rV...@earthlink.com... "B.H. Cramer"<benj...@yourservice.com wrote in messagenews:fvmdnZT_ff_ILmnV...@giganews.com... NEVER FORGET:"Deborah Lipstadt, author of the anti-revisionistpolemic Denying theHolocaust, has assigned [Binjamin Wilkormiski's book] Fragmentsin her Emory University class on Holocaust memoirs. When confrontedwithevidence that it is a fraud [the author spent the war in comfort inSwitzerland, not Auschwitz, and was not even a Jew], she commentedthatthe new revelations 'might complicate matters somewhat, but [the work]is still powerful.'" - In other words, who cares aboutfact or fiction where the Holocaustis concerned? And she had theclassic Jew audacity to discredit David Irving, andthen make news aboutit, going on TV with her Jewtardian anti-revisionismsound bites.Jason P Lipstadt is a disgusting, ugly, lying jewess, who is a tad smarterthan cohen. Here's some questions put to the slag which she has neveracknowledged. Questions for Lipstadt WE ARE often asked for questions toput to Professor Lipstadt in her well-funded peregrinations around theworld. ________________________________________ . . . here are just afew: 1. Prof. Lipstadt - why were you afraid to go into the witness boxand expose yourself even to the questioning of an amateur like Mr.Irving?You effectively pleaded the Fifth Amendment, which is thetraditional routeof those with something to hide. (Mr. Irving subjectedhimself voluntarilyto three weeks' cross examination by one of the world'sleading triallawyers, and he voluntarily made available to you his entireprivate and public papers.) 2. are you aware that one of your mainresearchers, Dr. David Cesarani,said that Mr. Irving gave the defence somescary moments, particularly whentheir chief expert witness on thearchitecture of Auschwitz, Prof. Van Pelt, proved unable to explain whathad happened to the bodies (i.e. thelogistics of disposing, for example,of 450,000 Hungarian Jews' bodies in three weeks - around 50,000 tons ofcorpses, by a small Sonderkommando in one crematory building) [Internetlink: see http://www.fpp.co.uk/docs/trial3/DieZeit120400e.html] 3. whydid you not accept David Irving's challenge, made three times publicly inthe courtroom, that he would halt the case in mid-trial ifyou could findany evidence of the holes in the roof slab of Crematorium IIat Auschwitz -which still exists - through which "eye witnesses" in the payof war-crimesprosecution teams claimed to have seen SS officers tipping the Zyklon Bgranules? Your own chief witness Van Pelt said there are no such holes inthe slab, so somebody lied, right? 4. why are you afraid of free debate?You have said there is no debate,but when push came to shove your highlypaid Queen's Counsel felt itnecessary to fill the courtroom every day forthree months with over thirtylawyers, counsel, barristers, assistants,historians, and researchers, just tostand up against Mr. Irving, whoappeared in court alone. Was your case really that weak? 5. why have youand your friends done all you can to muzzle Mr. Irving -by puttingpressure on publishers, broadcasters, television companies, andgovernments not to allow him to speak or to publish his widelyacknowledgedbooks? What are you scared of? 6. in a trial which was about a veryserious matter, why did you instruct your counsel to resort to smeartactics, branding Mr. Irving as an anti-Semite and a racist (although he,unlike your Counsel, frequently employs ethnic minorities as his personalstaff), and although neither allegation was made in your book or pleadedin your initial Defence? Were you frightened of fighting the case on thefacts of history? 7. how much money have you made out of this trial(articles, speakingfees, etc.) already? That's what it's about, isn't it -money? 8. do you think it right that your lawyers paid some of your socalled "neutral" expert witnesses a quarter of a million dollars ininducementsto testify in your favour? Those six million dollars put up bySteven Spielberg - you are a religious scholar: Have you never heard theBiblesay, "Good wine needs no bush"? If your case is rock solid why was somuchmoney swilling around that London courtroom? [Internet link:http://www.fpp.co.uk/Legal/Penguin/experts/payments.html] 9. a new Zealandacademic tribunal has just found that Prof. RichardEvans, your chiefwitness, was guilty of grossly distorting, misquoting, exaggerating, andpolemicizing in his similar "expert report" on Dr. Joel Hayward, andtotally lacking in the objectivity that is expected by acourt of an expertwitness. How do you feel about Evans now? [Internet link:http://www.fpp.co.uk/Legal/Penguin/experts/Evans/NZReportExtract.html] 10.have you read Norman Finkelstein's book, The Holocaust Industry. Ishe aracist and anti-Semite too? 11. you have argued in your books and articlesthat Jews should neverstoop to marrying outside their religion and race.Is that not racism in its purest and most evil form? 12. who paid yourown multi-million dollar legal expenses, and why didthe British HighCourt, unusually, not allow you to reclaim them? 13. Judge Gray found inhis Judgment that three of the statements youmade in your book against MrIrving are in fact serious lies just as heclaimed (the Stockholm terroristconference, the Hitler painting "above hisdesk", the stealing or damagingof the Goebbels diaries from the Moscowarchives. Have you removed themfrom the book's latest editions?) (Answer: You have not).What fraud? Stoptrying to divert attention from whats important here. Also,how has DavidIrving got anything to do w/ 'reactivating the Nazi Party'?He's ahistorian - also used to be a very famous one too, until he realisedthetruth & stopped writing about the 'Holocaust', THAT was his crime. Ialsobelieved in it until I started looking at all these reports. Q: Ifthere wasa 100% certainty it never happened, what evidence would stop youbelieving? A: NONE while you accept the stausquo.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_dQz86Ve8whttp://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=102884http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtCJtbSMiDw&feature=relatedhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3JI-axaRF4&feature=relatedGUTLESSWONDERS TAKE A LOOK AT SOME REAL GUTSY PEOPLE WHO ARENT ON THEIRKBEES ASSOON AS YOU MENTION JEW.the killing of Rachel Corrie a non Jewish Americanwho was killed by the IDFby being run down by a bulldozer,and the driverthen driving past the grieving peace vo;unteers with a smirkon his face.Andapparently Christian america along with Christian Americans have not hadaword to say.Just compare the difference below.http://www.thenausea.com/elements/thenotforgotten/rachel/index.htmlhttp://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/16/rafah.death/ One guy gets 10years, the other gets a raise and promotion?? For killinga non jewishamerican? And gets to smirk about it?JEWS CANNOT DO ENOUGH FOR AN AMERICANJEW? WOULD U SAY JEWS ARE USING NONJEWISHAMERICANS.http://www.jonathanpollard.org/1993/051693.htmCompounding theduplicity swirling around the case was the jurors'remarkable verdict: Mr.Nelson was indeed guilty of depriving his victim ofhis civil rights bystabbing him - but not by killing him. Thus, instead ofa possible lifesentence, the murderer, with credit for time served, may bea free man in amatter of months.http://www.jlaw.com/Commentary/3dayriot.htmlIt is thus withintense interest that we watch as a federal jury in Brooklynhears the caseof United States vs. Lemrick Nelson, Jr. and Charles Price --respectively,the accused killer of Yankel Rosenbaum, and the man chargedwith inciting themob that pursued Rosenbaum. As Coalition goes to press,the trial has finallybegun and the prosecution is presenting powerfulevidence against the twodefendantshttp://www.thenausea.com/elements/thenotforgotten/rachel/index.htmlhttp://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/16/rafah.death/HOW ABOUT YOUBETRAYING THE USA AND IT'S ALLIES?????HOW ABOUT YOUR SHIPMATES 0- SORRY GOODEHOUGH?http://www.ussliberty.com/challenge.htm - $10,000 challenge - TheLibertyVeterans Association offers a $10,000 reward to anyone who canestablish thetruth of A. Jay Cristol's claim:1http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig/margolis12.htmlAt 0800 hrs, 8 June, 1967,eight Israeli recon flights flew over 'Liberty,'which was flying a largeAmerican flag. At 1400 hrs, waves of low-flyingIsraeli Mystere andMirage-III fighter-bombers repeatedly attacked theAmerican vessel withrockets, napalm, and cannon. The air attacks lasted 20minutes, concentratingon the ship's electronic antennas and dishes. The'Liberty' was left afire,listing sharply. Eight of her crew lay dead, ahundred seriously wounded,including the captain, CommanderWilliamMcGonagle.http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/sh-usn/usnsh-l/agtr5.htmOn the afternoon of 8 June 1967, while in international waters off theSinaiPeninsula, Liberty, though clearly marked as a U.S. Navy ship, wasstruck byIsraeli aircraft. After suffering damage and many personnelcasualties fromgunfire, rockets and bombs, she was further attacked by threeIsraeli Navymotor torpedo boats. One torpedo hit her on the starboard side,forward ofthe superstructure, opening a large hole in her hull. In all,thirty-fourmen were killed in the attacks and nearly 170 wounded. Israelsubsequentlyapologized for the incident, explaining that its air and navalforces hadmistaken the Liberty for a much smaller Egyptian Navyship.December 12 - Twenty Arabs, five Jews and two British soldierskilled andthirty wounded in Jewish terrorist bomb attacks on buses in HaifaandRamleh, Palestine. British mandate to rule Palestine ends on 15 May1948;state of Israel established.December 29 - Jewish Irgun terroriststhrow grenades from passing taxi intocaf� near the Damascus gate, Jerusalem,Palestine, killing eleven Arabs andtwo British policemen.March11Headquarters of the Jewish Agency, Jerusalem, Palestine, destroyed byArabcar bomb killing thirteen and injuring eighty four.April 9Jewish Irgunterrorist group attacks Deir Yassim, Palestine, murdering twohundred andfifty four Arab women and children captured in the remains ofthevillage.JEWS APPEAR TO BE THE ONLY ONES WITH VOICES, WHAT HAS HPPENED TOTHEPREVIOUSLY VOCIFEROUS WASPS, and other religious and non religiousgroups.ONE JEWISH HOLLYWOOD MOTION PICTURE MOGULThe the Jewish controlledAmerican media proclaimed Americans were stronglypro Jewish and very antiBritish. One Hollywood motion picture Moguldeclared in the British pressthat he had a holiday in his heart every timea British soldier was killed inPalestine. and large sections of theAmerican media echoed thissentiment.http://hnn.us/articles/832.html"The Palestinians are fighting withhuman suicide bombers, that's all theyhave. The Israelis . . . they've gotone of the most powerful militarymachines in the world. The Palestinianshave nothing."-- Ted Turner, Founder of CNN"I do not think that in his heartan Israeli would deny that, if your enemyhas taken land that is rightfullyyours and occupied it, then not just yourenemy's army but his wife and sonand daughter and servants and all who,under his protection, come to live andmake their living on the stolen land,are aggressors. By their presence theyaid and abet the occupation."-- Matthew Parris, Saturday Times of London,June 22, 2002"David Ben-Gurion never moved against the Irgun and the SternGang untilafter the state was established and secured, which is definitelynot true inthe case of the Palestinian Authority. Essentially, the Israelisare askingthe Palestinians to do something they themselves refused to do."i-- Hussein Ibish, Communication director of the AmericanArabAnti-DiscriminationCommitteehttp://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/mufti.htmlZionist Jewish supremacists really hate this kind of article, that iswhy"Hate Crimes" exist. To protect the highest criminals.Is thisPolitically Correct??[The very creation of Israel required an act of terror.In 1948, most of thenon-Jewish indigenous people were ethnically cleansedfrom the part ofPalestine which became Israel. This action was carefullyplanned. Withoutit, no state with a Jewish majority and character would havebeen possible.Since 1948, the "Israeli Arabs", those Palestinians whoavoided expulsion,have suffered continuous discrimination. Indeed, many havebeen internallydisplaced, ostensibly for "security reasons", but really toacquire theirlands for Jews.]No, the Zionofreaks want to ban any history butwhat they write.Isn't it quite glaringly obvious that "The Holocaust"legends would fallapart without laws that make it illegal to questionit?Isn't it glaringly obvious that 911 was the "Goy Holocaust" forAmerica,that short circuits critical thinking and creates a victimmentallity thatjustifies all sorts of crimes against "evil"?Without "TheHolocaust" and "911", the manipulators of the US and Israelwould not havebeen able to carry out their "War on Terror" terrorismagainst the Arabs.Butwith a public that thinks it is persecuted and under attack, anyatrocity isjustified.The terrorists have won. Fornow.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UY-ZrwFwLQghttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_kv11fRvcM&feature=response_watch
mose
READ THIS AND YOU'LL SEE WHY PEOPLE ARE GOING TO STORMFRONT OR ANY OTHER
POLITICAL PARTY WHICH DOES NOT HAVE A POLICY OF APPROACHING JEWS ON THEIR
KNEES NO MATTER WHAT LIES THEY ARE TELLING.
AND WE HAVE A JOB AHEAD OF US . IT STARTED WITH ALLOWING THEM TO LIE ABOUT
THE HOLOCAUST AND HOW IT AFFECTED THEM.
WHEN IF YOU EXAMINE THE SITUATION THEY SUFFERED PIDDLING CASUALITIES EVEN IF
YOU TAKE THE BIGGEST FIGURE THEY CLAIM, AGAINST OUR NON JEWISH CIVILIAN AND
SERVICE CASUALTIES.
SO THAT IS WHY THEY HAVE INFLATED THE THEIR FIGURES BY ABOUT A MILLION. SO
BLOODY CHEEKY THAT IT WENT PAST. THEN THEY WORKED ON THE CLAMP LAW TO STOP
ANY EXAMINATION OF THE WARTIME FIGURES WITH THREAT OF JAIL.
WHAT AMAZES ME IS WHAT IS MOTIVATING OUR POLS, MONEY, OR JUST PLAIN
STUPIDITY
AND I HAVENT A CLUE HOW WE CAN GET BACK OUR MEDIA.
"B J Foster" <bjfo...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:hdgplv$7cd$2...@bjf.motzarella.org...
> mose wrote:
>> "Ruud66" <ruu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:4afadf40$0$1644$703f...@textnews.kpn.nl...
>>> "mose" <mo...@capp.com> wrote in message
>>> news:uyxKm.54009$ze1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> ...
>>>> WELL APPARENTLY THERE IS NO ONE TO TURN TO IF YOU DONT LIKE JEWISH
>>>> DOMINATION OF WHAT IS GOING ON IN THE WORLD AND ISRAEL IN OUR NAME AND
>>>> WITH OUR MONEY.
>
YOUR WORDS BJ NOT MINE , I DONT CARE ABOUT THE MIDEAST. JUST FUCK OF OUT OF
MY COUNTRY WITH YOUR LIES.
> Look at how those Jooz are taking over the Middle east eh?
http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=tW1-_JmXQt0&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYuWOi56Wq0&feature=related
> http://www.seraphicpress.com/images/state07.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8guH898FIUQ&feature=related
THERE YOU SICKO YOU WOULD NOT HAVE THE GUTS TO TALK STRAIGHT TO ANYONE. AND
YOUR SICK WAR WHICH IS JUST AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN. UNARMED AT THAT.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmEBPDZCWtM&feature=related
THATS THE ONLY WAY YOU'L TAKE OVER BY THE BACK STAB. JUST SICK THAT WE WERE
ALL FOOLED AND HELPED YOU ON ABSOLUTE BS.
READ BELOW.(BOTTOM)
Nine-eleven would not have occurred if the U.S. government had refused to
help Israel humiliate and destroy Palestinian society. Few express this
conclusion publicly, but many believe it is the truth. I believe the
catastrophe could have been prevented if any U.S. president during the
past 35 years had had the courage and wisdom to suspend all U.S. aid until
Israel withdrew from the Arab land seized in the 1967 Arab-Israeli war.
>
>>> This such old bogus that it aint funny again.
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion
>>>
>>> Get over yourself, Every muslim terrorist carries this around in a
>>> translated version.
AND IF EVERY NON JEW VISITED THE SITE THEY MIGHT BE SURPRISED HOW THIS FAKE
DOCUMENT DESCRIBES THE SITUATION SO ACCURATELY.
OF BY THE WAY WASNT IT ER JEWS AHO DISCOVERED THE DYING MAN EHO SOLVED THE
MYSTERYU?
YEAH I'D LIE ABOUT THE PROTOCOLS IF I WAS DYING AND I WAS OFFERED ENOUGH
MONEY FOR MY FAMILY.
AND OH THE TERRORISTS , WE KNOW WHAT STARTED THAT JUST NOT TAKEN IN BY POLS
BS, HOWEVER WELL THEY ARE PAID.
>>>
>>> R
>>>
>> ONLY PUT IT THERE FOR REFERENCE OF ANOTHER STRANGE CLAIM THAT WAS PROVED
>> TO BE A FAKE BY A DYING MAN???
>
> http://www.nazimorons.dont/want/to/get/the/message/
BROUHGT OUT THE OLD NAZI BIT , WELL IF CALLING A JEWISH ARSEHOLE AN ARSEHOLE
THEN I'M A NAZIS.
THOUGH REALLY YOU SICK CRAZIES KILLING AND MURDERING ,, AND YOUR SHITTY
CLUB HAS PUSHED INTO MY GOVERNMENT AND I SEE DECENT DEMOCRATIC COUNTRIES
ACTUALLY SUPPORTING THE SUPPRESSION OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
AND THEN OF COURSE YOU ACT LIKE A BUNCH OF SICKOS SO YES I'D LIKE TO SEE YOU
SICKOS MADE TO BE DECENT AND LIVE WITH THE PEOPLE AROUND.
AND YOUR MONSTROUS LIES , WHAT A LOAD OF CRAP YOU ARE CONSTANTLY TRYING TO
SHOVE DOWN DECENT PEOPLES THROAT.
THIS ABSOLUTE SHIT OF A PERSON JUST SITS UP HERE POSTING FOR THE DISGUSTENG
NAZI FILTH BACK IN ISRAEL ON A BUNCH OF LIES SO I LIKE SHOWING YOU UP FOR
THE STINKING FRAUD YOU ARE .
AND I FIND IT PARTICULARLY ITRRITATING THAT THE USLESS POLS WE VOTE IN HAVE
NOTE DONE SOMETHING TO UNMASK YOU INSTEAD OF ALLOWING OLD TEACHERS JUST
DOING THEIR JOB BEING BEATEN UP AND JAILED JUST TO SATISFY A BUNCH OF LIARS.
THESE PEOPLE REALLY SUFFERED - NOT FAT LYING JEWS , JUST ORDINARY PEOPLE
THAT THE WAR ROLLED OVER.
SEE IF YOU CAN MUSTER UP A BIT OF SYMPATHY FOR THESE UNCOMPLAINING
CHRISTIANS AND NON JEWS. AND LEAVE THE WHINING JEWS WITH THEIR FAIRY STORIES
ABOUT BEING GASSED AND HOW MUCH THEY LOST.
BESIDES THE CAMPS DONT FORGET THE WAR ROLLED OVER AND WAS FOUGHT IN THE
EUROPEANS HOMES, CHILDREN AND BABIES, AND CAREERS.
AND THESE SELFISH JEWS TRIED TO TAKE PRIDE OF PLACE WITH LIES.
(http://www.scrapbookpages.com/Poland/Crosses/Crosses.html )BY JUST STUPID
LIES SO APPARENT THAT ANY ONE SOON FOUND WHAT A FRAUD IT WAS.SO THEY HAD TO
SUPPRESS FREE SPEECH BY JAILING ANYONE WHO WAS A HISTORIAN AND SAW THROUGH
THE FRAUD STARIGHT AWAY.
SO ALL YOU NON JEWS SUPPORTING THESE LAWS AND THE JEWS BETTER TAKE A GOOD
LONG LOOK AT WHAT AND WHO THEY ARE SUPPORTING.
Non-Jewish Wartime camps
http://www.foitimes.com/internment/
http://www.foitimes.com/internment/Stories.htm
AND TURN YOUR SYMPATHY TO WHERE IT PROPERLY BELONGS INSTEAD OF BEING TAKEN
IN BY LIARS.
DO IT IN THE WINTER AND STICK IN A STACK OF EM PLUS THE TALMUDS. MAKE A
GREAT BLAZE. DO GREAT FOR BARBYS TO. GIVES THE PORK A BIT OF BITE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UY-ZrwFwLQg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_kv11fRvcM&feature=response_watch
HERE FRAUD IS WHAT DECENT PEOPLE , UNBIASED, NOT SLOBBERING OVER THE
THOUGHT OF HUGE REPARATIONS .
THE RED CROSS WAS THERE RIGHT THROUGH THE WAR, NON POLITICAL, NOT AFTER
MONEY, WELL THEY WERENT JEWISH OR WE WOULD HAVE HAD ANOTHER MOB WHINING
ABOUT HOW HARD THEY HAD IT.
NAFCASH TM presents
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/holohoax.htm
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article21878.htm
http://NEOCONZIONISTTHREAT.COM)
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/holohoax.htm
http://globalfire.tv/nj/03en/letters/2003oct_nbr01.htm
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/print.asp?ID=2735
http://www.rense.com/general69/factua.htm
JUST BLOODY LIARS AND THEIVES TRYING TO MAKE MONEY OF TERRIBLE WW2 AND ALL
THE CASUALITIES LIKE THE REST OF THE FAKE HOLOCAUST CLAIMERS AND STORY
TELLERS.
THE THING IS THESE LOVELY PEOPLE WITH THEIR LIES HAVE SLANDERED THE WHOLE
POPULATION OF EUROPE.
--
+
http://music.download.com/johnnyasia
+
http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecwar.html
� http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/ds9.htm
� http://www.rense.com/general45/zzo.htm
� http://www.heretical.com/mkilliam/wwii.html
Libraries, brothels, swimming??IN AUSWICHTZ???
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4138523842550891901#0h53m09s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dyBMuSYLGk
http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/history/zionism/news.php?q=1196891581
http://www.curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=888061
http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/1966
http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/130513
http://www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/htmlall/section_second_world_war?OpenDocumenthttp://www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/68zeb2?opendocumenthttp://www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/6ayg86Reportofthe International Committee of the Red Cross on its ActivitiesduringtheSecond World War, Geneva, 1948.You will find thousands of jewishfundedmuseums amd so calleduniversitiesthat supposedly have evidence , alsothereports themselves havebeen contaminated by jewish academics andsupporterscontinual injectionsthat the Red Cross did not see.The Red Crossis notpolitical or historical so keptrecords of it's actions,and ifastrocitiesoccurred they recorded them just as they do today.And the onlyevidenceoffered by holocaust supporters is the usual suspectexaggerationsfromreparation seeking jews castigated by honest honest jewsfor thishorribleuse of what suffering there was during this period.Despite thesuffering ofthe jews it was not as much as Europeans as a wholesuffered withover 5million imprisoned, a much hight number than the realnumber of jews .Andfree for anyone to investigate without fear ofimprisonment.Not tomentionthe disrupted lives of Europeans when their homes and townsbecamethebattlefields of WW2.To emphasize the determined efforts of the jews tostayin the limelight bypushing all other victims to the back while they baskinthe limelight , ina lot of cases undeservedlyso.http://www.scrapbookpages.com/Poland/Crosses/Crosses.htmlAs an examplethePolish who is the one country who had more (3 million -figures youcanexamine without fear of harassment) wanted to put up crossesfor victims,who were in there mostly for helping and supporting jews inPoland.Werecastigated and criticised by jewish groups claiming theremembrancesshouldonly be for their victims, and not be over shadowedbyChristianvictims.http://www.scrapbookpages.com/Poland/Crosses/Crosses.htmlhttp://www.holocaustforgotten.com/poland.htmhttp://www.holocaustforgotten.com/All thatcomes out clearly, whatever the reason that the jews were heldincamps,there was great co operation by the jews themselves, this forcedthemto findexcuses for their behavior, and easiest was lying aboutthecruelties of theGermans that caused this co operation. Rather fallsdownwhen there is nogassing and if camps were simply holding camps.As theirown leaders said.TheJewish ghetto police always had the option, she said, of"throwing offtheiruniforms and joining the rest of us" - a point that YitzakZuckerman,aleader of the Warsaw ghetto uprising, made inhismemoir.http://www.theexperiment.org/articles.php?news_id=2139There is notashred of evidence, for example, that "a gas chamber was in the processofbeing built at Dachau, but it was never completed." (See "TheSecondLeuchter Report" by American gas chamber expert Fred Leuchter in TheJournalof Historical Review, Fall 1990.) There is likewise no proof that"mentallyand physically handicapped people were killed" by gas at any of thefour"institutions" Wiesenthal mentions. This US Army photo was taken atDachauon April 30, 1945, one day after the camp's capture. It shows a GIstandingin front of a door marked with a skull and crossbones and thewords"Caution! Gas! Life danger! Do not open!" According to the officialcaption,"these chambers were used by Nazi guards for killing prisoners oftheinfamous Dachau concentration camp." In fact, this is a smalldisinfectiongas chamber used for delousing clothes. It was never used tokill people.For several decades, this photo has been widely reproduced tohelp keepalive the notorious Dachau "gas chamber" myth. (US Army photoSC206194.)Besides the condensation below you can exam the various reviewsofthe REDCROSS covering WW2 during the time of the jews claimedastrocitiescommitedby the Germans.Inmates ReleasedMore than 200,000prisoners weretransferred from Auschwitz to other camps,and about 8,000 werein the campwhen it was liberated by Soviet forces. Inaddition, about 1,500prisonerswho had served their sentences werereleased, and returned to theirhomecountries. [16] If Auschwitz hadactually been a top secretexterminationcenter, would the Germans havereleased inmates who "knew" whatwas happeningthere?Himmler Orders DeathRateReducedhttp://www.ihr.org/books/hoggan/21.htmlhttp://www.outlawjournalism.com/news/?p=5803http://www.rense.com/general69/factua.htmhttp://www.777healthproducts.com/07g.htmhttp://www.intellnet.org/resources/resistance/holocaust/04.htmhttp://www.icrc.ch/Web/Eng/siteeng0.nsf/iwpList418/359CC4EF8A1E5C72C1256B66005B2171A little hard to obtain a report that is not heavilyinfluenced byjewishpressure to includE holocaust AS THEY WOULD LIKE ALL TOSEE IT..So youwill notice that holocaust is not denied just a quiet it wasbadetc.THEJEWS AND THE CONCENTRATION CAMPS:A FACTUAL APPRAISAL BY THE REDCROSS.Thereis one survey of the Jewish question in Europe during WorldWarTwo and theconditions of Germany's concentration camps which isalmostunique in itshonesty and objectivity, the three-volume Reportof theInternationalCommittee of the Red Cross on its Activitiesduring the SecondWorld War,Geneva, 1948.This comprehensive account from an entirelyneutralsourceincorporated and expanded the findings of two previousworks:Documentssur l'activit� du CICR en faveur des civils d�tenus danslescamps deconcentration en Allemagne 1939-1945 (Geneva, 1946), andInterArma Caritas:the Work of the ICRC during the Second World War(Geneva, 1947).The team ofauthors, headed by Fr�d�ric Siordet,explained in the openingpages of theReport that their object, in thetradition of the Red Cross, hadbeen strictpolitical neutrality, andherein lies its great value.The ICRCsuccessfullyapplied the 1929 Geneva military convention inorder to gainaccess tocivilian internees held in Central and WesternEurope by theGermanyauthorities. By contrast, the ICRC was unable togain any access totheSoviet Union, which had failed to ratify theConvention. The millionsofcivilian and military internees held inthe USSR, whose conditions wereknownto be by far the worst, werecompletely cut off from anyinternationalcontact or supervision.The Red Cross Report is of value in thatit firstclarifies thelegitimate circumstances under which Jews weredetainedinconcentration camps, i.e. as enemy aliens. In describing thetwocategoriesof civilian internees, the Report distinguishes the secondtypeas "Civiliansdeported on administrative grounds (inGerman,"Schutzh�ftlinge"), who werearrested for political or racialmotivesbecause their presence wasconsidered a danger to the State ortheoccupation forces" (Vol. 111, p. 73).These persons, it continues,"wereplaced on the same footing as personsarrested or imprisonedunder common lawfor security reasons." (P.74).TheReport admits that the Germans were atfirst reluctant to permitsupervisionby the Red Cross of people detained ongrounds relating tosecurity, but bythe latter part of 1942, the ICRCobtained importantconcessions fromGermany. They were permitted to distributefoodparcels to majorconcentration camps in Germany from August 1942,and"from February 1943onwards this concession was extended to all othercampsand prisons" (Vol.111, p. 78). The ICRC soon establishedcontact with campcommandants andlaunched a food relief programmewhich continued to functionuntil the lastmonths of 1945, letters ofthanks for which came pouring infrom Jewishinternees.Red Cross Recipients Were JewsThe Report states that"As many as9,000 parcels were packed daily.From the autumn of 1943 until May1945,about 1,112,000 parcels with atotal weight of 4,500 tons were sent offtothe concentration camps"(Vol. III, p. 80). In addition to food,thesecontained clothing andpharmaceutical supplies. "Parcels were sent toDachau,Buchenwald,Sangerhausen, Sachsenhausen,Oranienburg,Flossenburg,Landsberg-am-Lech, Fl�ha, Ravensbr�ck,Hamburg-Neuengamme,Mauthausen,Theresienstadt, Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen, tocamps near Viennaand inCentral and Southern Germany. The principalrecipients wereBelgians,Dutch, French, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, Polesand statelessJews"(Vol. III, p. 83).In the course of the war, "The Committeewas in aposition to transferand distribute in the form of relief suppliesovertwenty millionSwiss francs collected by Jewish welfareorganisationsthroughout theworld, in particular by the American JointDistributionCommittee ofNew York" (Vol. I, p. 644). This latter organisationwaspermitted bythe German Government to maintain offices in Berlin untiltheAmericanentry into the war. The ICRC complained that obstruction oftheirvastrelief operation for Jewish internees came not from the Germansbutfromthe tight Allied blockade of Europe. Most of their purchases ofrelieffoodwere made in Rumania, Hungary and Slovakia.The ICRC had special praiseforthe liberal conditions which prevailedat Theresienstadt up to the timeoftheir last visits there in April1945. This camp, "where there wereabout40,000 Jews deported fromvarious countries was a relativelyprivilegedghetto" (Vol. III, p.75). According to the Report, "'TheCommittee'sdelegates were able tovisit the camp at Theresienstadt (Terezin)which wasused exclusivelyfor Jews and was governed by special conditions.Frominformationgathered by the Committee, this camp had been started asanexperimentby certain leaders of the Reich ... These men wished to givetheJewsthe means of setting up a communal life in a town undertheirownadministration and possessing almost complete autonomy. . .twodelegateswere able to visit the camp on April 6th, 1945. Theyconfirmedthe favourableimpression gained on the first visit" (Vol.I, p . 642).TheICRC also hadpraise for the regime of Ion Antonescu of FascistRumania wherethe Committeewas able to extend special relief to183,000 Rumanian Jews untilthe time ofthe Soviet occupation. The aidthen ceased, and the ICRCcomplained bitterlythat it never succeeded"in sending anything whatsoever toRussia" (Vol. II,p. 62). The samesituation applied to many of the Germancamps after their"liberation"by the Russians. The ICRC received a voluminousflow of mailfromAuschwitz until the period of the Soviet occupation, whenmany oftheinternees were evacuated westward. But the efforts of the RedCrosstosend relief to internees remaining at Auschwitz under Sovietcontrolwerefutile. However, food parcels continued to be sent toformerAuschwitzinmates transferred west to such camps as BuchenwaldandOranienburg.NoEvidence Of GenocideOne of the most important aspects ofthe Red CrossReport is that itclarifies the true cause of those deaths thatundoubtedlyoccurred inthe camps toward the end of the war. Says the Report:"In thechaoticcondition of Germany after the invasion during the finalmonths ofthewar, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvationclaimedanincreasing number of victims. Itself alarmed by this situation,theGermanGovernment at last informed the ICRC on February 1st, 1945 ...InMarch 1945,discussions between the President of the ICRC andGeneral of theS.S.Kaltenbrunner gave even more decisive results.Relief could henceforthbedistributed by the ICRC, and one delegatewas authorised to stay in eachcamp..." (Vol. III, p. 83).Clearly, the German authorities were at painstorelieve the diresituation as far as they were able. The Red Cross arequiteexplicitin stating that food supplies ceased at this time due totheAlliedbombing of German transportation, and in the interests ofinternedJewsthey had protested on March 15th, 1944 against "thebarbarousaerial warfareof the Allies" (Inter Arma Caritas, p. 78). ByOctober2nd, 1944, the ICRCwarned the German Foreign Office of theimpendingcollapse of the Germantransportation system, declaringthatstarvation conditions for peoplethroughout Germany werebecominginevitable.In dealing with thiscomprehensive, three-volume Report,it isimportant to stress that thedelegates of the International RedCrossfound no evidence whatever at thecamps in Axis occupied Europe ofadeliberate policy to exterminate the Jews.In all its 1,600 pages theReportdoes not even mention such a thing as a gaschamber. It admitsthat Jews, likemany other wartime nationalities, sufferedrigours andprivations, but itscomplete silence on the subject ofplannedextermination is ample refutationof the Six Million legend. LiketheVatican representatives with whom theyworked, the Red Cross founditselfunable to indulge in the irresponsiblecharges of genocidewhich had becomethe order of the day. So far as thegenuine mortalityrate is concerned, theReport points out that most of theJewishdoctors from the camps were beingused to combat typhus on theeasternfront, so that they were unavailablewhen the typhus epidemics of1945broke out in the camps (Vol. I, p. 204ff) - Incidentally, itisfrequently claimed that mass executions werecarried out in gaschamberscunningly disguised as shower facilities. Againthe Reportmakes nonsense ofthis allegation. "Not only the washing places,butinstallations for baths,showers and laundry were inspected bythedelegates. They had often to takeaction to have fixtures madelessprimitive, and to get them repaired orenlarged" (Vol. III, p. 594).NotAll Were InternedVolume III of the Red CrossReport, Chapter 3 (I. JewishCivilianPopulation) deals with the "aid given tothe Jewish section ofthefree population," and this chapter makes it quiteplain that by nomeansall of the European Jews were placed in internmentcamps, butremained,subject to certain restrictions, as part of thefreecivilian population.This conflicts directly with the "thoroughness"ofthe supposed"extermination programme", and with the claim in theforged H�ssmemoirs thatEichmann was obsessed with seizing "everysingle Jew he could layhis handson."In Slovakia, for example, where Eichmann's assistant DieterWislicenywasin charge, the Report states that "A large proportion oftheJewish minorityhad permission to stay in the country, and atcertainperiods Slovakia waslooked upon as a comparative haven of refugeforJews, especially for thosecoming from Poland. Those who remainedinSlovakia seem to have been incomparative safety until the end ofAugust1944, when a rising against theGerman forces took place. Whileit is truethat the law of May 15th, 1942 hadbrought about theinternment of severalthousand Jews, these people were heldin campswhere the conditions of foodand lodging were tolerable, and wheretheinternees were allowed to do paidwork on terms almost equal to thoseofthe free labour market" (Vol. I, p.646).Not only did large numbers of thethree million or so European Jewsavoidinternment altogether, but theemigration of Jews continuedthroughout thewar, generally by way of Hungary,Rumania and Turkey.Ironically, post-warJewish emigration fromGerman-occupiedterritories was also facilitated by theReich, as in the caseof thePolish Jews who had escaped to France before itsoccupation. "TheJewsfrom Poland who, whilst in France, had obtained entrancepermits totheUnited States were held to be American citizens by theGermanoccupyingauthorities, who further agreed to recognize the validityofabout threethousand passports issued to Jews by the consulates ofSouthAmericancountries" (Vol. I, p. 645).As future U.S. citizens, these Jews wereheld atthe Vittel camp insouthern France for American aliens. The emigrationofEuropean Jewsfrom Hungary in particular proceeded during the warunhinderedby theGerman authorities. "Until March 1944," says the. RedCrossReport,"Jews who had the privilege of visas for Palestine were freetoleaveHungary" (Vol. I, p. 648). Even after the replacement oftheHorthyGovernment in 1944 (following its attempted armistice withtheSovietUnion) with a government more dependent on Germanauthority,theemigration of Jews continued.The Committee secured the pledgesof bothBritain and the UnitedStates "to give support by every means totheemigration of Jews fromHungary," and from the U.S. Government theICRCreceived a messagestating that "The Government of the United States ...nowspecificallyrepeats its assurance that arrangements will be made by itforthecare of all Jews who in the present circumstances are allowedtoleave"(Vol. I, p . 649).Biedermann agreed that in the nineteen instancesthat "DidSix MillionReally Die?" quoted from the Report of theInternationalCommittee ofthe Red Cross on its Activities during the SecondWorld War andInterArma Caritas (this includes the above material), it did soaccurately.Aquote from Charles Biedermann (a delegate of theInternationalCommittee ofthe Red Cross and Director of the RedCross'International Tracing Service)under oath at the Z�ndel Trial(February9, 10, 11 and12,1988).http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=2735http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/14645862&referer=brief_results ACTUALLY -- AND CONTRARY TOHISHIGHLY FLATTERING PUBLIC IMAGE -- THE RENOWNED "NAZI HUNTER" HASAWELL-DOCUMENTED BUT LITTLE-KNOWN RECORD OF DECEIT, MENDACITYANDPREVARICATION. SOME HIGHLIGHTS: Wiesenthal repeatedly lied about hisallegedrole in locating Adolf Eichmann, was consistently wrong about JosefMengele,and falsely accused Polish-American Frank Walus of having murderedJews inPoland as a Gestapo official. Wiesenthal has absurdly charged thattheGermans exterminated Jews in "electrocution chambers," and thattheymanufactured bars of soap from the bodies of murdered Jews. Hisdeceptionabout his own wartime activities prompted Austrian Chancellor BrunoKreisky(himself of Jewish ancestry) to accuse the "Nazi hunter" ofhavingcollaborated with his wartime oppressors. (For details aboutWiesenthal'srecord, see: M. Weber, "Simon Wiesenthal: Bogus Nazi Hunter,"The Journal ofHistorical Review, Winter 1989-90.) THE CANADIAN JEWISH NEWS,Jan. 30, 1992Wannsee's importance rejected London (JTA) - An IsraeliHolocaust scholarhas debunked the Wannsee Conference, at which top Naziofficials are said tohave gathered at a villa in a Berlin suburb in 1942 todraw the blueprintsof the "Final Solution." According to Prof. Yehuda Bauer(photo) of theHebrew University in Jerusalem, Wannsee was a meeting, "buthardly aconference", and "little of what was said there was executed indetail.""The public still repeats, time after time, the silly story that atWannseethe extermination of the Jews was arrived at." "I have never heldmyselfout to be a Holocaust expert, nor have I written books about what isnowcalled the Holocaust." "I have done my best to prepare the casethatfollows, but I respectfully submit that I do not have any duty tobecome anexpert on the Holocaust, my Lord." "I have never claimed to beaHolocaust historian. As I have said, I have no written no book abouttheHolocaust. I have written no article about it. If I have spoken aboutit,it is usually because somebody has asked me a question, I havebeenquestioned about it. On such occasions I have emphasised my lackofexpertise and I have expatiated only upon those areas with which Iamfamiliar."http://www.fpp.co.uk/Legal/Penguin/transcripts/day002.htm:"Now, you heard mesay in my opening statement, Mr Rampton, that I am notan expert on theHolocaust. What I would now say would be a figure withoutany valuewhatsoever." "Q. [Rampton] What you do you say about Sobibor,Treblinka,Belzec and Chelmno?" "A. [Irving] Nothing at all. I am notan expert."RJ.Winston Churchill wrote a five volume history of World WarII andnevermentioned the holocaust. He never mentioned it because he knewthattheholocaust was just wartime propaganda and he did not want to sullywhathehoped would be the definitive history of the war with propagandathatcommonsense alone could refute. I could go on but the evidence I speakofisavailable to The Jubilee readers from many patriotic sources eventhoughitis still widely censored by America's media and libraries.Ionceconsidered the battle over the holocaust as a great politicaltrumpcardallowing us to take back the moral high ground on the censorshipissuefromthe left. But I see now that it is much more important thanthat.Theholocaust is qualitatively different than the silly lies nationstelltheircitizens to get them so fired up they will send their children todieinforeign wars. The holocaust is not pre-war propaganda. Itispost-warpropaganda.Why do we need post World War II propaganda?BecauseWorld War II was thegreatest human catastrophe in two thousand yearsfor theAryan peoples andwe "gentiles" must not be allowed to see the truth.It wasmore than theslaughter of our racial kinsmen and the destruction ofourracial homeland.World War II was the most significant crossroadstheChristian nations havefaced since Herman faced the legions of Rome intheforests of Teutonberg2,000 years ago. But Herman won the battleofTeutonberg Wald. The Christianworld lost World War II. We lost becausewecame to a crossroads and wentthe wrong way.http://www.nafcash.com/Lestyouthink there must be some truth to the alleged Treblinka holocaust NAFCASHTMis offering a $250,000.00 REWARD For locating JUST ONE of the alleged"HUGEMASS GRAVES" of Treblinka NAFCASH TM presents THE TREBLINKA CRIMESCENEINVESTIGATION CHALLENGE TM You must scientifically - forensically provethegrave's EXACT location,its EXACT dimensions and its EXACTvolumetricdensity. The cremated remains must total AT LEAST one percent ofthe allegedmassmurder. JUST ONE MASS GRAVE! - JUSTONEPERCENT!http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/holohoax.htm HOW TO KEEPACADEMICSQUIET The Real Issue Is Israel's Human Rights Record: A statementby NormanG. Finkelstein upon publication of Beyond Chutzpah ProfessorAlanDershowitz of Harvard University is currently best known for hisadvocacyof the "most excruciating" torture against terrorist suspects suchas a"needle being shoved under the fingernails." The alleged purpose ofthistorture is to extract a truthful confession but its real consequence,ashuman rights organizations have pointed out, is to producewhateverstatements are necessary to end the suffering.For 15 monthsDershowitz hasapplied a variant of this truth-seeking technique -- lessphysicallypainful but no less excruciating -- to prospective publishers ofBeyondChutzpah, which offers a critical examination of Israel's humanrightsrecord and Dershowitz's defense of it. Enlisting one of the mostpowerfullaw firms in the country after his personal initiativesprovedunsuccessful, Dershowitz has repeatedly threatened to bankrupthighlyrespected publishers with litigation if they didn't cancel publicationofmy book. He could then proclaim that the cancellation confirmed the"truth"that Beyond Chutzpah didn't meet scholarly standards. Dershowitzjustifiedthese blackmail tactics on the ground that Beyond Chutzpah libelshim. Yet,when I first began to expose his gross scholarly misconduct,Dershowitzpublicly declared at UCLA (on 21 October 2003) that he wouldn'trespondwith a libel action because he believed "so strongly in theFirstAmendment and full freedom of speech." Ironically, just as hewasthreatening my publishers with expensive and time-consuminglawsuits,Dershowitz denounced Holocaust denier David Irving, who had suedDeborahLipstadt for libel, with these words: "Before Irving lost his case[againstLipstadt], several publishers had refused to issue books criticalofIrving, out of fear of his bringing expensive and time-consuminglawsuits.That was a chilling of free speech" (Afterword to Lipstadt'sHistory onTrial; his emphasis). My publisher, University of CaliforniaPress, wasunderstandably at great pains to fend off a potential lawsuitbyDershowitz; for an academic publisher the associated costs would havebeenruinous, to the point of making certain victory meaningless. Onoccasionour relationship became strained and at one point it appeared as ifwe hadreached an impasse. However, through the skillful mediation ofNationmagazine senior editor Roane Carey (who was the freelance editor ofBeyondChutzpah) and others, a satisfactory compromise was reached thatprotectedthe interests of both publisher and author, and, mostimportantly,preserved the integrity of the book. I would like personallyto extend myheartfelt thanks to all who supported me and the press duringthisdifficult period."Another Frenchman, Paul Rassinier, a pre-war communistandlater asocialist, had been a member of the French Resistance. Hewasarrested andinterned in concentration camps, among them Buchenwald. In1948he publisheda book Crossing the Line, in which he argued that peoplemighthave beenkilled in concentration camps, but that the perpetrators hadactedon theirown, not on orders from headquarters.AS WITH ABU GRAIB."Thesavingof the Jews in Europe did not figure at the head of the listofpriorities ofthe ruling class. It was the foundation of the State whichwasprimordial intheir eyes." "The masses of Jews from Hungary's ghettosobediently boardedthedeportation trains without knowing their fate. Theywere full ofconfidence in the false information that they were beingtransferredtoKenyermeze.The truth is that somewhere between 700,000 and1,500,000people died inGerman work camps in 1944 and 1945. Most of them wereJews.Many were not.Most of them died in the last six months of the warfromdisease and hungercaused by America's bombing of Germany andsubsequentdestruction of herinfrastructure. There were some atrocities butvery few.Few people realizethat the International Red Cross had a fieldoffice inAuschwiz from 1942 untilthe end of the war. That office neverreported orrecorded any atrocities (Several years agointernational Jewryforced the RedCross to apologize to the Jews -apologize for not seeingsomething thatnever happened.)Clearly, the German authorities were at painsto relieve thedire situationas far as they were able. The Red Cross arequite explicit instating thatfood supplies ceased at this time due to theAllied bombing ofGermantransportation, and in the interests of interned Jewsthey hadprotested onMarch 15th, 1944 against "the barbarous aerial warfareof theAllies" (InterArma Caritas, p. 78). By October 2nd, 1944, the ICRCwarnedthe GermanForeign Office of the impending collapse of theGermantransportationsystem, declaring that starvation conditions forpeoplethroughout Germanywere becoming inevitable.A Jewish woman named MarikaFrankarrived at Auschwitz-Birkenau from Hungaryin July 1944, when 25,000Jewswere supposedly gassed and cremated daily.She likewise testified afterthewar that she heard and saw nothing of "gaschambers" during the time shewasinterned there. She heard the gassingstories only later.[15]InmatesReleasedMore than 200,000 prisoners were transferred fromAuschwitz to othercamps,and about 8,000 were in the camp when it wasliberated by Sovietforces. Inaddition, about 1,500 prisoners who had servedtheir sentenceswerereleased, and returned to their home countries. [16] IfAuschwitzhadactually been a top secret extermination center, would theGermanshavereleased inmates who "knew" what was happening there?HimmlerOrdersDeath RateReducedhttp://www.ifamericansknew.org/http://www.ussliberty.org/"Asgard"<asg...@home.net wroteinmessagenews:zZadnTJAIc9c0_DY...@giganews.com...� Whataload of emotive old bollocks, bullshit and lies. The narrator statestheinmates were "starving' at Bergen Belsen, yet the vast majority oftheinmates look positively fat and shiny. He goes on to say those dead,haddied of starvation, yet earlier stated they'd not eaten for only 6days.The images of the dead showed mainly emaciated corpses, nothing likethepeople still moving around. If they'd died of "starvation", why hadthevasst majority of the inmates not suffered the same fate. Why, indeedwasitonly the corpses which were emaciated. What I foundparticularlyintersting, was significant incidence ofpetachiae on thebodies of thedead. THIS IS A CLASSIC SIGN OF EPIDEMIC TYPHUS. Thedocumentary was madein 2005, by a yid, and I note they're stillusing themythical 4millionfigure for deaths at Auschsitz. Haven't correctedthescript. They alsostate, quite clearly, there were 6m jewish deaths incamps. No mention ofthe supposed Einzatzgroupen. The entire documentary isa farcical attemptheighten the victimhoodstatus of yids. Any of theexperts like tocomment? Keenan? You're an expert oneverything. Gord,likewise. McFey? Gotany answers chaps? I look forward to your attempts toshoot this onedown.Russian troops marched into Berlin on April 24, 1945,they found 800Jewsalive and well in Berlin'sJewishhospital.http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/april/21/newsid_3560000/3560175.stm51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration WiththeNazishttp://www.wrmea.com/archives/Sept_2004/0409086.html"Topaz"<mars...@hotmail.com wroteinmessagenews:pklr449roj8r6c7uf...@4ax.com... "Theorthodoxholocaust story can not possibly be defended with rationalargumentsbecause its absurdity is overwhelming. We are asked to believe inthe fatamorgana of a vast slaughter in killing factories which left notraceswhatsoever - no documents, no bones, no teeth, no ashes - nothing!We arefurther asked to believe that the Allies, who had a large networkofinformers all over Europe and a spy in the German leadership(AdmiralCanaris, the head of the German intelligence), did not becomeaware ofthis gigantic genocide until the end of the war, for if they hadknownabout the mass murder, they would have acted to stop it. Finally, weareasked to believe that the Jews in Poland, the epicentre of theholocaust,did not know anything about the Auschwitz gas chambers as lateas inAugust 1944, otherwise the Jews from the Lodz ghetto would not havegoneto Auschwitz voluntarily - which is precisely what they did, asrelated byRaul Hilberg in his standard work about the holocaust (DieVernichtung dereuropaeischen Juden, p. 543/544). As the Zionist-controlledsystem of the"Western democracies" is woefully unable to counter therevisionists witharguments, it resorts to censorship and brute force inorder to silencethe dangerous heretics. And the Jews are graduallytransforming theholocaust into a religion. This is a very clever strategy,for as RobertFaurisson aptly remarks, one cannot refute a religion withscientificarguments. Thus, the holocaust museums and holocaust monumentsspreadinglike mushrooms all over America and Europe are really temples ofthe newreligion, whereas professional "holocaust survivors" such as ElieWieselare the priests of the new religion. To prove this assertion, weonly haveto quote Wiesel himself: "The Holocaust is a holy mystery, thesecret ofwhich is limited to the circle of the priesthood of survivors"(PeterNovick, The Holocaust in American Life, 1999, p. 211, 212,retranslatedfrom the German). Another high priest of the holocaust cult,SimonWiesenthal, goes even further: "When each of us comes before theSixMillion, we will be asked what we did with our lives... I will say: Ididnot forget you" (Simon Wiesenthal in Response, Vol. 20, Nr. 1).Nocritical questions about the holocaust are allowed because they areablasphemy: They cause immense distress to the eternal victimsofpersecution, the Jews, and are an attempt to whitewash National Socialism - the most evil ideology of all times which made theholocaustpossible! In today's Germany, it is even considered inadmissibletocompare the holocaust with the atrocities of communist tyrants suchasStalin or Cambodian dictator Pol Pot because this is regarded asa"relativisation" and "trivialization" of the worst crime inhistory.French Zionist propagandist Claude Lanzmann, the producer of a longandunspeakably dull film about the holocaust (the title of this film isShoa,the Hebrew word for "catastrophe", which is often used by Jews asasynonym for "holocaust") makes no effort to conceal that theholocaustcult is to replace Christianity: "If Auschwitz is something otherthan ahorror of history, then Christianity totters in its foundations.Christ isthe Son of God, who went to the end of the humanely endurable,where heendured the cruellest suffering. (...) If Auschwitz is true, thenthere isa human suffering with which that of Christ simply cannot becompared.(...) In this case, Christ is false, and salvation will not comefrom him.(...) Auschwitz is the refutation of Christ." (Les temps modernes,Paris,December 1993, p. 132, 133.) Nowadays, a large percentage of theJews donot believe in God any more, but virtually all of them believe inthe SixMillion. The Zionist leadership cunningly exploits the holocaust tounitethe World's Jews by keeping them in a constant state of hysteriaandpersecution mania, insinuating that only if the Jews stick togetherwillthey be able to ban the threat of a new holocaust. It goes withoutsayingthat very few Non-Jews are willing to embrace the murkyholocaustreligion. While the overwhelming majority of people in the Weststillbelieve that the official holocaust version is essentially true (evenifthey suspect that the figures might me somewhat inflated), theyarethoroughly fed up with the eternal lamentation about Jewish victimsandJewish suffering. They simply don't want to hear it any more. InGermany,opinion polls showed that a vast majority of the population wasagainstthe planned holocaust monument in Berlin (which not a single majorparty,not a single leading politician and not a single big newspaper daredtooppose). Privately, the politicians are probably as profoundlydisgustedwith the endless holocaust litany as the rest of the population,but theycannot possibly afford to let the revisionists win because thiswouldshatter the very foundations of the "democratic" system to which theyowntheir careers and their wealth... The ultimate weapon against Zionismandthe state of Israel At the end of the year 2000, Israel is abesiegedcountry, but from the military point of view, it is still vastlysuperiorto its neighbours, and it enjoys the unconditional support of theUnitedStates. Should any of the Islamic states grow strong enough toseriouslythreaten Israel, it would most probably be attacked andmilitarilyannihilated by America. Russia is not likely to risk aconfrontation withthe USA for the sake of the Palestinians. We cancertainly admire thebravery of the Palestinians resistance fighters whoare willing tosacrifice their lives to liberate their homeland from thealien intruders,but realistically, they have no chance to win. ThePalestinians havestones and slings. The Israelis have helicopters andtanks. You can'tdestroy helicopters and tanks with stones and slings.When fightingone's enemy, one should always look for his weakest spot. Theweakest spotof Israel, its Achilles heel, is the holocaust lie to which itowes itsexistence. The revisionists can give the adversaries of Israelandinternational Zionism a terrible weapon. It is quite true thatmanyrevisionists are by no means guided by political considerations. Someofthem - Carlo Mattogno is a good example - are only motivatedbyintellectual curiosity: They want to ascertain what really happened totheJews during the Second World War. But even if revisionism is notapolitical movement, its political implications are tremendous.Therevisionists are endeavouring to find out the truth, and truth isthedeadliest enemy of Israel and international Jewry. Thus, therevisionistsobjectively work against Israel and Zionism, even ifsubjectively theirgoals are often purely scientific and devoid of anypolitical ambition.This is, of course, the reason why they are persecutedand their booksburnt in more and more countries. In view of the totalJewish mediacontrol and the ever-growing anti-revisionist repression inmany Westerncountries, it is very difficult indeed to achieve arevisionistbreakthrough. We revisionists are facing an uphill strugglewhich can onlypartly be explained by our total lack of financialresources. Fortunatelythe internet, which the Jews are unable to censure,has greatly improvedour possibilities to make the results of our researchknown to the World,but all the same, we should not cherish naiveillusions: Not every citizenof the Western world who is informed about therevisionist arguments willautomatically become revisionist andanti-Zionist. The average person inthe West - and particularly in Germany - has been so thoroughlybrainwashed that a sudden exposure tothe truth can provoke a nervousbreakdown or stomach cramps. I haverepeatedly witnessed this myself.Other people would gladly accept thetruth about the holocaust, but asthey know that even the slightestsuspicion of revisionism leads to socialostracism, economic ruin and legalpersecution, they understandably prefernot to get involved. However, if wewant to win the war against those whomone of my Russian friends called"the enemies of God and mankind".. Thelogical consequence of all this isthat those countries which areauthentically anti-Zionist and real friends ofthe oppressed Palestinianpeople should make the breakthrough of holocaustrevisionism theirforemost priority. A tank costs millions of dollars, yetone soldier candestroy it with a single missile. The revisionists canprovideanti-Zionist freedom fighters with a weapon not even a thousandmissilescan destroy." http://www.ihr.org/http://www.natvan.comhttp://www.thebirdman.orghttp://www.nsm88.com/http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.htmlWell the claim thatthey were fighting fora homeland might float, howeverif the are still moreconcerned about jewishaims and dreams than weighingthis of with therequirements of the other nonjewish citizens in thecountries in which theyreside, then obviously the nonjewish citizens havereason to object andignore their claims at the expenseof their own wealth, lives andwellbeing.We have already paid a top pricefor assisting jews in theirselfish selfishself centred aims.Casualties inWW2Not including thedocumented 5 million non Jewish in concentrationcampswho far out numberedthe suspected true number of Jewish victims. Andthisis without lies andexaggerations about non jewish cassualities.SovietUnion 25,568,000China11,324,000Germany 7,060,000Poland 6,850,000Japan1,806,000Yugoslavia1,700,000Rumania 985,000France 810,000Austria525,000Italy 410,000GreatBritain 388,000USA 295,000Holland 250,000Belgium85,000Finland 79,000Canada42,000India 36,000Australia 29,000Albania28,000Spain 22,000Bulgaria21,000New Zealand 12,000Norway 10,000South Africa9,000Luxembourg5,000Denmark 4,000TOTAL 58,353,000The Jewish ghetto policealways had theoption, she said, of "throwing offtheir uniforms and joiningthe rest ofus" - a point that Yitzak Zuckerman,a leader of the Warsawghetto uprising,made inhismemoir.http://www.theexperiment.org/articles.php?news_id=2139WithoutJewishco operation through the zionists the Germans would neverhave hadtheresources to herd the Jews into the various camps. And thezionists madeitimpossible for the underground to trust the jews.Like elsewhere, theonlypeople who had the information and the ear of thefrightenedJewishpopulation were the Judenrat. In this case the Judenratcomprisedmainly theZionist Federation members. Without their help the SS,with 19officers andless than 90 men, plus a few hundred Hungarian police,could nothavecollected and controlled a million Jews, when they did noteven knowtheirwhereabouts.So no reluctance amongst jews as they knew that they weresimplybeingencamped._____________________________________THE PROBLEM BEINGTHATTHE ONLY WILD AND WEIRD ACCOUNTS OF UNTRAMMELLEDHORROR CAME FROMONLYJEWS.NON JEWS COMPLETELY CONTRADICTED THE WILD STORIES FROMTHECONTRACTINGMUSCLES TO THE SOAP AND TATTOOED LAMPSHADES, ALL BS.DuringWorldWarII, Rassinier was a highly decorated member of the FrenchResistance.InOctober of 1943 he was arrested by the Gestapo forvariousactivitiesincluding the smuggling of Jewish refugees over theFranco-Swissborder took2 years to publish his book because of persistentresistanceby thejewishclique.http://www.ihr.org/books/rassinier/debunking1-0.htmlhttp://www.ihr.org/books/hoggan/A4.htmlhttp://www.fpp.co.uk/bookchapters/articles/HowWarsBegin.htmlhttp://www.anti-rev.org/textes/VidalNaquet92a/part-6.htmlhttp://www.alibris.com/search/books/author/Paul_RassinierBut the huge moneyinvolved inthe reparations won out and we have anothertrue report labeled asa revisionagainst the lies that were spread andapparently plenty of jewishand jewishsupporters willing to jump on thebandwagon and build up thestories, supplyall sorts of shonky evidence tosupport the lies.And of coursethe jewishmoney made it very iffy for experts to testifybecause of theconstantarttacks , false ads on the net. in books and byevery jew and hismother ofall ages whose chances of being either witnessesof involvedwere/are slimmerbut apparently the courts i n Germany also helpthe cause offalsifyingevidence.Although even honest jews could not sway the lies andFinklesteinlikeRassinier, HarryElmerBarnes(http://www.amazon.com/Perpetual-Peace-Harry-Elmer-Barnes/dp/0939484013http://www.courts.fsnet.co.uk/harryelmerbarnes.htm and of courseyouwillfind the jewish supporters here labelling him as a revisionistbecausehedid not agree withtheirversionhttp://www.revisionists.com/revisionists/barnes.htmlhttp://tmh.floonet.net/articles/barnes.html ), CharlesA.Beard(http://www.questia.com/read/6153679?title=Cross%20Currents%20in%20Europe%20To-Dayhttp://www.questia.com/SM.qst ) ,HermanHesse(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Complete_Fairy_Tales_of_Hermann_Hesse ) confession is from Hoess. Here are the details: "In theintroductionto Death Dealer [Buffalo: Prometheus, 1992], the historianSteven Paskulywrote: "Just after his capture in 1946, the British SecurityPolice wereable to extract a statement from Hoess by beating him andfilling him withliquor." Paskuly was reiterating what Rupert Butler andBernard Clarke hadalready described. In 1983, Rupert Butler published anunabashed memoir(Legions of Death, Hamlyn: London) describing in graphicdetail how, overthree days, he and Clarke and other British policemenmanaged to tortureHoess into making a "coherent statement." According toButler [Legions ofDeath, p. 237], he and the other interrogators put theboots to Hoess themoment he was captured. For starters, Clarke struck hisface four times toget H�ess to reveal his true identity. <quote Theadmission suddenlyunleashed the loathing of Jewish sergeants in thearresting party whoseparents had died in Auschwitz following an ordersigned by H�ss. Theprisoner was torn from the top bunk, the pajamas rippedfrom his body. Hewas then dragged naked to one of the slaughter tables,where it seemed toClarke the blows and screams were endless. Eventually,the Medical Officerurged the Captain: "Call them off, unless you want totake back a corpse."A blanket was thrown over H�ss and he was dragged toClarke's car, wherethe sergeant poured a substantial slug of whisky downhis throat. H�sstried to sleep. Clarke thrust his service stick underthe man's eyelidsand ordered in Geffnan: "Keep your pig eyes open, youswine." For thefirst time H�ss trotted out his oft-repeated justification:"I took myorders from Himmler. I was a soldier in the same way as youare a soldierand we had to obey orders." The party arrived back at Heidearound threein the morning. The snow was swirling still, but theblanket was tornfrom H�ss and he was made to walk completely nudethrough the prisonyard to his cell. </quote An article in the Britishnewspaper WrexhamLeader [Mike Mason, "In a cell with a Nazi warcriminal-We kept him awakeuntil he confessed," October 17, 1986] followingthe airing of a TVdocumentary on the case of Rudolf Hoess includedeyewitness recollectionsby Ken Jones: <quote Mr. Ken Jones was then aprivate with the FifthRoyal Horse Artillery stationed at Heid[e] inSchleswig-Holstein. "Theybrought him to us when he refused to cooperateover questioning abouthis activities during the war. He came in thewinter of 1945/6 and wasput in a small jail cell in the barracks," recallsMr. Jones. Two othersoldiers were detailed with Mr. Jones to join H�ss inhis cell to helpbreak him down for interrogation. "We sat in the cellwith him, night andday, armed with axe handles. Our job was to prod himevery time he fellasleep to help break down his resistance," said Mr.Jones. When H�sswas taken out for exercise he was made to wear onlyjeans and a cottonshirt in the bitter cold. After three days and nightswithout sleep,H�ss finally broke down and made a full confession to theauthorities.</quote The confession Hoess signed was numbered documentNO-1210; laterrevamped, as document PS-3868, which became the basis for anoraldeposition Hoess made for the IMT on April 15, 1946, a month after ithadbeen extracted from him by torture... Since what people confess toafterthey have been captured by the Communists and their liberal comradesisnot proof of anything, this leaves only the stories of survivors.Thesecontradict each other and not believable. One professional survivorsaidthat he could tell if the Germans were gassing German Jews or PolishJewsby the color of the smoke. The fact that there are so many"survivors"is not proof of an extermination plan. There may be six millionsurvivors.Just about every Jew that is old says he is a survivor.FrederickBausman(http://www.thenation.com/archive/detail/13677001 ) allthe honestteachersand historians were labelled nazi , which of course theywerent, butif youpoint out the lies the only support you are going to getis from antisemiticgroups.And of course there is the decent honest jew tired of thelies.Astatement by Norman G. Finkelstein upon publication ofBeyondChutzpahhttp://www.nowar-paix.ca/nowar/forum/6973http://666ismoney.com/HolocaustAds.htmlI, Raquel Baranow am a Grad Student of Holocaust Denial.Thereare personswith PhD's in various fields whoalso deny the 6 millioncanard.The best evidence is forensic. Untilrecently, there was neveraforensicexamination of the alleged murder weapon (gas chambers).Demographicfiguresare incomplete. After the fallof East Europe to communism,many ofthe millions of Jews who fled Polandinto the Soviet Union or endedupbehindthe Iron Curtain changed their names to assimilate, manyciviliansdied inthe war, many died in theconcentration camps of louse-borntyphus. DuringWorld War One, two millioncivilians in the Soviet Union diedoftyphus. Manydied in Stalin's gulags.YadVashem,(http://www.yadvashem.org/wps/portal/IY_HON_Welcome)aHolocaustDocumentationCenter in Israel has a database of 3,000,000 allegedvictimsofNaziextermination. But as you canseeHERE(http://666ismoney.com/YadVashem.html) (my maiden name,Friedemann),nearlyevery name is listed at leasttwice, some as many asfivetimes!http://www.yadvashem.org/lwp/workplace/IY_HON_WelcomeYadVashem's3,000,000 "Holocaust victims" database lists nearlyeveryone twice.Some asmany at five times. Anyone, includingyou can submit a "PageofTestimony".And of course we have lists duplicated, unconfirmed, but3maccording to ourusual jewish/Zionist sources.Put your name in, you mightbemissing out on reparations.Has been improvements since this, numbersstillvery dicey.Name Town District RegionCountry Bday SourceFriedemannAdolfBerlin Berlin Berlin Germany1879 list of victims fromGermanyFriedemannAdolf Berlin Berlin Berlin Germany1879 list of deportationfromBerlinFriedemann Adolf Berlin Berlin Berlin Germany1905 list ofdeportationfrom BerlinIt is forensically impractical or impossible toexterminatemillions withlouse disinfestant (hydrogen cyanide gas)or dieselexhaust asalleged by malicious "witnesses" or torturedconfessors. There areno writtenorders forextermination. Aerial reconnaissance photographs oftheconcentration campsshow no smoke and flamesbelching from the crematoriaandpyres as alleged. The photos and recordsshow there was not enoughcokeorcrematoria to cremate millions of corpses. The "witnesses"andconfessorslied about how many minutes it takesto cremate a corpse.Dieselexhaust does not contain significant amount ofcarbon monoxide to killahuman. Ifthe Nazis wanted to kill millions they could have driven thecoalfiredtrain into a tunnel or quonset hut and gassed'em with the exhaustfromthe locomotive or used the exhaust from thecrematoria. At Auschwitz,duringa typhusepidemic, up to 300 people died per day, hence thecrematoria,shaving ofheads and requisitions for tons ofZyklon B lousedisinfestant. HCNis a very dangerous, impractical, messymethodforextermination.http://www.vho.org/The Holocaust Controversy A Case foropenDebateThe Gas Chambers are a fraud, a tourist attraction,slander,demonizing,impractical/impossible, maliciousatrocity propagandaspread bythe communists, who hated Hitler andperpetrated by Jews, whowerealwayslooking for ways to get to the lands of milk and money. TheJewshaveextorted billions from the US Treasury,Germany, Swiss banksandinsurance companies on account of the Holohoaxfraud. The Holohoaxalsomakesthose who fought Hitler feel like they did something goodfightingthedemon, Hitler instead of letting Hitler takeon Stalin alone.A"liberal"person has an open mind. A bigot is irrational and obstinate.Andthen wehave the honest red cross with no ulterior motives.The NewBlasphemyby TomBlairNews Editor, The JubileeThere was a time when a man didnot blasphemeGod in America. There weresevere social proscriptions againstit. Somecommunities even had lawsagainst blasphemy. Well blasphemy is stilla greatsin in America and maysoon be a crime again. But sadly America has anew godand so, a newblasphemy.Let me here commit the new blasphemy while itisstill legal. What we knowas the "holocaust" is largely war-timepropaganda.Propaganda that, unlikemost war-time propaganda, was not quietlyforgotten.Instead it hascontinued; grown more fantastic, more hateful, andmoredangerous toquestion every year since 1945.The truth is thatsomewherebetween 700,000 and 1,500,000 people died inGerman work camps in1944 and1945. Most of them were Jews. Many were not.Most of them died in thelastsix months of the war from disease and hungercaused by America's bombingofGermany and subsequent destruction of herinfrastructure. There weresomeatrocities but very few. Few people realizethat the International RedCrosshad a field office in Auschwiz from 1942until the end of the war.Thatoffice never reported or recorded anyatrocities (Several yearsagointernational Jewry forced the Red Cross toapologize to the Jews -apologizefor not seeing something that neverhappened.)� WARNING To PeopleinAustria; Belgium; France; Germany; Israel; Spain and Switzerland.Youcan be fined, imprisoned or both for discussing the topics setforthin this article.It was only after I moved to the Los Angeles areaseveralyears ago that Irealized that many people were not aware thatmillions ofvictims of theHolocaust were NOT Jewish. Outside the Polishcommunity, Iheard very littlemention about the five million non-Jewishvictims -- usuallyreferred to as"the othersSubject: Israeli rabbi backsJewish suicide attacksOrganization: Copyright1997 by Reuters Lines: 43Date: Tue, 8 Apr 19979:22:44 PDT Kidnappings, Beatings, Murders andHangingsAttacks by the Irgunand Stern Gang - In 1944, with the end the warinsight, Irgun, now under theleadership of Menachem Begin , the futurePrimeMinister of Israel 1977-83,began to attack the British administrationinPalestine, starting with bombattacks on the immigration offices,taxoffices and policestations.http://www.britains-smallwars.com/Palestine/kidnap.htmThe Americanswerestrongly pro Jewish and very anti British. One Hollywoodmotion pictureMoguldeclared in the British press that he had a holiday inhis heart everytime aBritish soldier was killed in Palestine. and largesections of theAmericanmedia echoed this sentiment.November 27 -Eight British soldierskilled inbomb attack on police station Jerusalem,Palestine, in Jewish Irgunterroristattack.http://www.cdiss.org/terror_1940s.htmJuly 22 - Ninetypeople killedand forty five wounded after Jewishterrorists blow up the KingDavid Hotelin Jerusalem, Palestine, which washome to British government andmilitaryoffices. The terrorists held workersat pistol point while theyplanted theexplosives in the basement of thehotel.July 12 - Jewish Irgunterroristskidnap and then hang two British Armysergeants. The terroristswere tryingto secure the release of three Irgunmembers who had beensentenced to deathby the British authorities inPalestine.September 29 -Jewish Irgunterrorists bomb police station in Haifa,Palestine, killing fourBritish andfour Arab policemen, as well as two Arabcivilians. Forty sixpeopleinjured.http://forum.cari.com.my/archiver/?tid-117974.htmlDecember4,1948New Palestine PartyVisit of Menachem Begin and Aims ofPoliticalMovement DiscussedTO THE EDITORS OF THE NEW YORK TIMES:Among themostdisturbing political phenomena of our times is the emergencein thenewlycreated state of Israel of the "Freedom Party" (Tnuat Haherut),apoliticalparty closely akin in its organization, methods,politicalphilosophy andsocial appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties. It wasformedout of themembership and following of the former Irgun Zvai Leumi,aterrorist,right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine.Attack on ArabVillageAshocking example was their behavior in the Arab village of DeirYassin.Thisvillage, off the main roads and surrounded by Jewish lands, hadtakenno partin the war, and had even fought off Arab bands who wanted to usethevillageas their base. On April 9 (THE NEW YORK TIMES), terroristbandsattacked thispeaceful village, which was not a military objective inthefighting, killedmost of its inhabitants - 240 men, women, andchildren -and kept a few ofthem alive to parade as captives through thestreets ofJerusalem. Most ofthe Jewish community was horrified at the deed,and theJewish Agency sent atelegram of apology to King Abdullah ofTrans-Jordan.But the terrorists, farfrom being ashamed of their act, wereproud of thismassacre, publicized itwidely, and invited all the foreigncorrespondentspresent in the country toview the heaped corpses and thegeneral havoc atDeir Yassin.The Deir Yassinincident exemplifies thecharacter and actions of theFreedom Party.(signed)Isidore Abramowitz, HannahArendt, Abraham Brick, Rabbi JessurunCardozo,Albert Einstein, Herman Eisen,M.D., Hayim Fineman, M. Gallen, M.D.,H.H.Harris, Zelig S. Harris, SidneyHook, Fred Karush, Bruria Kaufman, IrmaL.Lindheim, Nachman Maisel, SymourMelman, Myer D. Mendelson, M.D., HarryM.Orlinsky, Samuel Pitlick, FritzRohrlich, Louis P. Rocker, RuthSager,Itzhak Sankowsky, I.J. Schoenberg,Samuel Shuman, M. Znger, IrmaWolpe,Stefan WolpeNew York, Dec.2,1948[/quote]http://comment.independent.co.uk/commentators/article1197235.ece"B.H. Cramer" <benj...@yourservice.com wroteinmessagenews:4MKdnSvnVuD_lmrV...@giganews.com... "JasonP"<jas...@REMOVE.gmail.com wrote inmessagenews:xY6dndIdJenal2rV...@earthlink.com... "B.H.Cramer"<benj...@yourservice.com wrote inmessagenews:fvmdnZT_ff_ILmnV...@giganews.com... NEVERFORGET:"Deborah Lipstadt, author of the anti-revisionistpolemicDenying theHolocaust, has assigned [Binjamin Wilkormiski's book]Fragmentsin her Emory University class on Holocaust memoirs. Whenconfrontedwithevidence that it is a fraud [the author spent the war incomfort inSwitzerland, not Auschwitz, and was not even a Jew], shecommentedthatthe new revelations 'might complicate matters somewhat,but [the work]is still powerful.'" - In other words, whocares aboutfact or fiction where the Holocaustis concerned? Andshe had theclassic Jew audacity to discredit David Irving, andthen makenews aboutit, going on TV with her Jewtardian anti-revisionismsoundbites.Jason P Lipstadt is a disgusting, ugly, lying jewess, who is a tadsmarterthan cohen. Here's some questions put to the slag which she hasneveracknowledged. Questions for Lipstadt WE ARE often asked forquestions toput to Professor Lipstadt in her well-funded peregrinationsaround theworld. ________________________________________ . . . here arejust afew: 1. Prof. Lipstadt - why were you afraid to go into the witnessboxand expose yourself even to the questioning of an amateur likeMr.Irving?You effectively pleaded the Fifth Amendment, which isthetraditional routeof those with something to hide. (Mr. Irvingsubjectedhimself voluntarilyto three weeks' cross examination by one ofthe world'sleading triallawyers, and he voluntarily made available to youhis entireprivate and public papers.) 2. are you aware that one of yourmainresearchers, Dr. David Cesarani,said that Mr. Irving gave the defencesomescary moments, particularly whentheir chief expert witness onthearchitecture of Auschwitz, Prof. Van Pelt, proved unable to explainwhathad happened to the bodies (i.e. thelogistics of disposing, forexample,of 450,000 Hungarian Jews' bodies in three weeks - around 50,000tons ofcorpses, by a small Sonderkommando in one crematory building)[Internetlink: see http://www.fpp.co.uk/docs/trial3/DieZeit120400e.html]3. whydid you not accept David Irving's challenge, made three timespublicly inthe courtroom, that he would halt the case in mid-trial ifyoucould findany evidence of the holes in the roof slab of Crematorium IIatAuschwitz -which still exists - through which "eye witnesses" in the payofwar-crimesprosecution teams claimed to have seen SS officers tipping theZyklon Bgranules? Your own chief witness Van Pelt said there are no suchholes inthe slab, so somebody lied, right? 4. why are you afraid of freedebate?You have said there is no debate,but when push came to shove yourhighlypaid Queen's Counsel felt itnecessary to fill the courtroom everyday forthree months with over thirtylawyers, counsel, barristers,assistants,historians, and researchers, just tostand up against Mr.Irving, whoappeared in court alone. Was your case really that weak? 5.why have youand your friends done all you can to muzzle Mr. Irving -byputtingpressure on publishers, broadcasters, television companies,andgovernments not to allow him to speak or to publish hiswidelyacknowledgedbooks? What are you scared of? 6. in a trial which wasabout a veryserious matter, why did you instruct your counsel to resort tosmeartactics, branding Mr. Irving as an anti-Semite and a racist (althoughhe,unlike your Counsel, frequently employs ethnic minorities as hispersonalstaff), and although neither allegation was made in your book orpleadedin your initial Defence? Were you frightened of fighting the caseon thefacts of history? 7. how much money have you made out of thistrial(articles, speakingfees, etc.) already? That's what it's about, isn'tit -money? 8. do you think it right that your lawyers paid some of yoursocalled "neutral" expert witnesses a quarter of a million dollarsininducementsto testify in your favour? Those six million dollars put upbySteven Spielberg - you are a religious scholar: Have you never heardtheBiblesay, "Good wine needs no bush"? If your case is rock solid why wassomuchmoney swilling around that London courtroom? [Internetlink:http://www.fpp.co.uk/Legal/Penguin/experts/payments.html] 9. a newZealandacademic tribunal has just found that Prof. RichardEvans, yourchiefwitness, was guilty of grossly distorting, misquoting, exaggerating,andpolemicizing in his similar "expert report" on Dr. Joel Hayward,andtotally lacking in the objectivity that is expected by acourt of anexpertwitness. How do you feel about Evans now? [Internetlink:http://www.fpp.co.uk/Legal/Penguin/experts/Evans/NZReportExtract.html]10.have you read Norman Finkelstein's book, The Holocaust Industry. Ishearacist and anti-Semite too? 11. you have argued in your books andarticlesthat Jews should neverstoop to marrying outside their religion andrace.Is that not racism in its purest and most evil form? 12. who paidyourown multi-million dollar legal expenses, and why didthe BritishHighCourt, unusually, not allow you to reclaim them? 13. Judge Gray foundinhis Judgment that three of the statements youmade in your book againstMrIrving are in fact serious lies just as heclaimed (the Stockholmterroristconference, the Hitler painting "above hisdesk", the stealing ordamagingof the Goebbels diaries from the Moscowarchives. Have you removedthemfrom the book's latest editions?) (Answer: You have not).What fraud?Stoptrying to divert attention from whats important here. Also,how hasDavidIrving got anything to do w/ 'reactivating the Nazi Party'?He'sahistorian - also used to be a very famous one too, until herealisedthetruth & stopped writing about the 'Holocaust', THAT was hiscrime. Ialsobelieved in it until I started looking at all these reports. Q:Ifthere wasa 100% certainty it never happened, what evidence would stopyoubelieving? A: NONE while you accept thestausquo.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_dQz86Ve8whttp://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=102884http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtCJtbSMiDw&feature=relatedhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3JI-axaRF4&feature=relatedGUTLESSWONDERS TAKE A LOOK AT SOME REAL GUTSY PEOPLE WHO ARENT ON THEIRKBEES ASSOONAS YOU MENTION JEW.the killing of Rachel Corrie a non Jewish Americanwho waskilled by the IDFby being run down by a bulldozer,and the driverthen drivingpast the grieving peace vo;unteers with a smirkon his face.AndapparentlyChristian america along with Christian Americans have not hadaword tosay.Just compare the differencebelow.http://www.thenausea.com/elements/thenotforgotten/rachel/index.htmlhttp://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/16/rafah.death/ One guy gets10years, the other gets a raise and promotion?? For killinga nonjewishamerican? And gets to smirk about it?JEWS CANNOT DO ENOUGH FOR ANAMERICANJEW? WOULD U SAY JEWS ARE USINGNONJEWISHAMERICANS.http://www.jonathanpollard.org/1993/051693.htmCompoundingtheduplicity swirling around the case was the jurors'remarkable verdict:Mr.Nelson was indeed guilty of depriving his victim ofhis civil rightsbystabbing him - but not by killing him. Thus, instead ofa possiblelifesentence, the murderer, with credit for time served, may bea free man inamatter of months.http://www.jlaw.com/Commentary/3dayriot.htmlIt is thuswithintense interest that we watch as a federal jury in Brooklynhears thecaseof United States vs. Lemrick Nelson, Jr. and CharlesPrice --respectively,the accused killer of Yankel Rosenbaum, and the manchargedwith inciting themob that pursued Rosenbaum. As Coalition goes topress,the trial has finallybegun and the prosecution is presentingpowerfulevidence against thetwodefendantshttp://www.thenausea.com/elements/thenotforgotten/rachel/index.htmlhttp://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/16/rafah.death/HOW ABOUTYOUBETRAYING THE USA AND IT'S ALLIES?????HOW ABOUT YOUR SHIPMATES 0- SORRYGOODEHOUGH?http://www.ussliberty.com/challenge.htm - $10,000 challenge -TheLibertyVeterans Association offers a $10,000 reward to anyone whocanestablish thetruth of A. Jay Cristol'sclaim:1http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig/margolis12.htmlAt 0800 hrs, 8 June,1967,eight Israeli recon flights flew over 'Liberty,'which was flying alargeAmerican flag. At 1400 hrs, waves of low-flyingIsraeli MystereandMirage-III fighter-bombers repeatedly attacked theAmerican vesselwithrockets, napalm, and cannon. The air attacks lasted 20minutes,concentratingon the ship's electronic antennas and dishes. The'Liberty' wasleft afire,listing sharply. Eight of her crew lay dead, ahundred seriouslywounded,including the captain,CommanderWilliamMcGonagle.http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/sh-usn/usnsh-l/agtr5.htmOn the afternoon of 8 June 1967, while in international waters offtheSinaiPeninsula, Liberty, though clearly marked as a U.S. Navy ship,wasstruck byIsraeli aircraft. After suffering damage and manypersonnelcasualties fromgunfire, rockets and bombs, she was further attackedby threeIsraeli Navymotor torpedo boats. One torpedo hit her on thestarboard side,forward ofthe superstructure, opening a large hole in herhull. In all,thirty-fourmen were killed in the attacks and nearly 170wounded. Israelsubsequentlyapologized for the incident, explaining that itsair and navalforces hadmistaken the Liberty for a much smaller EgyptianNavyship.December 12 - Twenty Arabs, five Jews and two Britishsoldierskilled andthirty wounded in Jewish terrorist bomb attacks on busesin HaifaandRamleh, Palestine. British mandate to rule Palestine ends on 15May1948;state of Israel established.December 29 - Jewish Irgunterroriststhrow grenades from passing taxi intocaf� near the Damascus gate,Jerusalem,Palestine, killing eleven Arabs andtwo Britishpolicemen.March11Headquarters of the Jewish Agency, Jerusalem, Palestine,destroyed byArabcar bomb killing thirteen and injuring eighty four.April9Jewish Irgunterrorist group attacks Deir Yassim, Palestine, murderingtwohundred andfifty four Arab women and children captured in the remainsofthevillage.JEWS APPEAR TO BE THE ONLY ONES WITH VOICES, WHAT HAS HPPENEDTOTHEPREVIOUSLY VOCIFEROUS WASPS, and other religious and nonreligiousgroups.ONE JEWISH HOLLYWOOD MOTION PICTURE MOGULThe the JewishcontrolledAmerican media proclaimed Americans were stronglypro Jewish andvery antiBritish. One Hollywood motion picture Moguldeclared in the Britishpressthat he had a holiday in his heart every timea British soldier waskilled inPalestine. and large sections of theAmerican media echoedthissentiment.http://hnn.us/articles/832.html"The Palestinians are fightingwithhuman suicide bombers, that's all theyhave. The Israelis . . . they'vegotone of the most powerful militarymachines in the world. ThePalestinianshave nothing."-- Ted Turner, Founder of CNN"I do not think thatin his heartan Israeli would deny that, if your enemyhas taken land that isrightfullyyours and occupied it, then not just yourenemy's army but his wifeand sonand daughter and servants and all who,under his protection, come tolive andmake their living on the stolen land,are aggressors. By theirpresence theyaid and abet the occupation."-- Matthew Parris, Saturday Timesof London,June 22, 2002"David Ben-Gurion never moved against the Irgun andthe SternGang untilafter the state was established and secured, which isdefinitelynot true inthe case of the Palestinian Authority. Essentially, theIsraelisare askingthe Palestinians to do something they themselves refusedto do."i-- Hussein Ibish, Communication director of theAmericanArabAnti-DiscriminationCommitteehttp://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/mufti.htmlZionist Jewish supremacists really hate this kindof article, that iswhy"Hate Crimes" exist. To protect the highestcriminals.Is thisPolitically Correct??[The very creation of Israel requiredan act of terror.In 1948, most of thenon-Jewish indigenous people wereethnically cleansedfrom the part ofPalestine which became Israel. Thisaction was carefullyplanned. Withoutit, no state with a Jewish majority andcharacter would havebeen possible.Since 1948, the "Israeli Arabs", thosePalestinians whoavoided expulsion,have suffered continuous discrimination.Indeed, many havebeen internallydisplaced, ostensibly for "securityreasons", but really toacquire theirlands for Jews.]No, the Zionofreaks wantto ban any history butwhat they write.Isn't it quite glaringly obvious that"The Holocaust"legends would fallapart without laws that make it illegal toquestionit?Isn't it glaringly obvious that 911 was the "Goy Holocaust"forAmerica,that short circuits critical thinking and creates avictimmentallity thatjustifies all sorts of crimes against "evil"?Without"TheHolocaust" and "911", the manipulators of the US and Israelwould nothavebeen able to carry out their "War on Terror" terrorismagainst theArabs.Butwith a public that thinks it is persecuted and under attack,anyatrocity isjustified.The terrorists have won.Fornow.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UY-ZrwFwLQghttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_kv11fRvcM&feature=response_watch
B J Foster
> READ THIS AND YOU'LL SEE WHY ...
> I HAVENT A CLUE....
"Islam�s Other Victims: India
By: Serge Trifkovic
Monday, November 18, 2002
Moslem aggression against India illustrates the meaning of jihad.
...
India prior to the Moslem invasions was one of the world�s great
civilizations. Tenth century Hindustan matched its contemporaries in the
East and the West in the realms of philosophy, mathematics, and natural
science. Indian mathematicians discovered the number zero (not to
mention other things, like algebra, that were later transmitted to a
Moslem world which mistaken has received credit for them.) Medieval
India, before the Moslem invasion, was a richly imaginative culture, one
of the half-dozen most advanced civilizations of all time. Its
sculptures were vigorous and sensual, its architecture ornate and
spellbinding. And these were indigenous achievements and not, as in the
case of many of the more celebrated high-points of Moslem culture,
relics of pre-Moslem civilizations that Moslems had overrun.
Moslem invaders began entering India in the early 8th century, on the
orders of Hajjaj, the governor of what is now Iraq. (Sound familiar?)
Starting in 712 the raiders, commanded by Muhammad Qasim, demolished
temples, shattered sculptures, plundered palaces, killed vast numbers of
men � it took three whole days to slaughter the inhabitants of the city
of Debal � and carried off their women and children to slavery, some of
it sexual. After the initial wave of violence, however, Qasim tried to
establish law and order in the newly-conquered lands, and to that end he
even allowed a degree of religious tolerance. but upon hearing of such
humane practices, his superior Hajjaj, objected:
"It appears from your letter that all the rules made by you for the
comfort and convenience of your men are strictly in accordance with
religious law. But the way of granting pardon prescribed by the law is
different from the one adopted by you, for you go on giving pardon to
everybody, high or low, without any discretion between a friend and a
foe. The great God says in the Koran [47.4]: "0 True believers, when you
encounter the unbelievers, strike off their heads." The above command of
the Great God is a great command and must be respected and followed. You
should not be so fond of showing mercy, as to nullify the virtue of the
act. Henceforth grant pardon to no one of the enemy and spare none of
them, or else all will consider you a weak-minded man."
In a subsequent communication, Hajjaj reiterated that all able-bodied
men were to be killed, and that their underage sons and daughters were
to be imprisoned and retained as hostages. Qasim obeyed, and on his
arrival at the town of Brahminabad massacred between 6,000 and 16,000 men.
The significance of these events lies not just in the horrible numbers
involved, but in the fact that the perpetrators of these massacres were
not military thugs disobeying the ethical teachings of their religion,
as the European crusaders in the Holy Land were, but were actually doing
precisely what their religion taught. (And one may note that
Christianity has grown up and no longer preaches crusades. Islam has
not. As has been well-documented, jihad has been preached from the
official centers of Islam, not just the lunatic fringe.)
Qasim�s early exploits were continued in the early eleventh century,
when Mahmud of Ghazni, "passed through India like a whirlwind,
destroying, pillaging, and massacring," zealously following the Koranic
injunction to kill idolaters, whom he had vowed to chastise every year
of his life.
In the course of seventeen invasions, in the words of Alberuni, the
scholar brought by Mahmud to India,
"Mahmud utterly ruined the prosperity of the country, and performed
there wonderful exploits, by which the Hindus became like atoms of dust
scattered in all directions, and like a tale of old in the mouth of the
people. Their scattered remains cherish, of course, the most inveterate
aversion toward all Moslems."
Does one wonder why? To this day, the citizens of Bombay and New Delhi,
Calcutta and Bangalore, live in fear of a politically-unstable and
nuclear-armed Pakistan that unlike India (but like every other Moslem
country) has not managed to maintain democracy since independence.
Mathura, holy city of the god Krishna, was the next victim:
"In the middle of the city there was a temple larger and finer than the
rest, which can neither be described nor painted." The Sultan [Mahmud]
was of the opinion that 200 years would have been required to build it.
The idols included "five of red gold, each five yards high," with eyes
formed of priceless jewels. "The Sultan gave orders that all the temples
should be burnt with naphtha and fire, and leveled with the ground."
In the aftermath of the invasion, in the ancient cities of Varanasi,
Mathura, Ujjain, Maheshwar, Jwalamukhi, and Dwarka, not one temple
survived whole and intact. This is the equivalent of an army marching
into Paris and Rome, Florence and Oxford, and razing their architectural
treasures to the ground. It is an act beyond nihilism; it is outright
negativism, a hatred of what is cultured and civilized.
In his book The Story of Civilization, famous historian Will Durant
lamented the results of what he termed "probably the bloodiest story in
history." He called it "a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is
that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and
freedom can at any moment be overthrown by barbarians invading from
without and multiplying from within."
Moslem invaders "broke and burned everything beautiful they came across
in Hindustan," displaying, as an Indian commentator put it, the
resentment of the less developed warriors who felt intimidated in the
encounter with "a more refined culture." The Moslem Sultans built
mosques at the sites of torn down temples, and many Hindus were sold
into slavery. As far as they were concerned, Hindus were kafirs,
heathens, par excellence. They, and to a lesser extent the peaceful
Buddhists, were, unlike Christians and Jews, not "of the book" but at
the receiving end of Muhammad�s injunction against pagans: "Kill those
who join other gods with God wherever you may find them." (Not that
being "of the book" has much helped Jewish and Christian victims of
other Moslem aggressions, but that�s another article.)
The mountainous northwestern approaches to India are to this day called
the Hindu Kush, "the Slaughter of the Hindu," a reminder of the days
when Hindu slaves from Indian subcontinent died in harsh Afghan
mountains while being transported to Moslem courts of Central Asia. The
slaughter in Somnath, the site of a celebrated Hindu temple, where
50,000 Hindus were slain on Mahmud�s orders, set the tone for centuries.
The gentle Buddhists were the next to be subjected to mass slaughter in
1193, when Muhammad Khilji also burned their famous library. By the end
of the 12th century, following the Moslem conquest of their stronghold
in Bihar, they were no longer a significant presence in India. The
survivors retreated into Nepal and Tibet, or escaped to the south of the
Subcontinent. The remnants of their culture lingered on even as far west
as Turkestan. Left to the tender mercies of Moslem conquerors and their
heirs they were systematically destroyed, sometimes�as was the case with
the four giant statues of Buddha in Afghanistan in March 2001�up to the
present day.
That cultivated disposition and developed sensibility can go hand in
hand with bigotry and cruelty is evidenced by the example of Firuz Shah,
who became the ruler of northern India in 1351. This educated yet
tyrannical Moslem ruler of northern India once surprised a village where
a Hindu religious festival was celebrated, and ordered all present to be
slain. He proudly related that, upon completing the slaughter, he
destroyed the temples and in their place built mosques.
The Mogul emperor Akbar is remembered as tolerant, at least by the
standards of Moslems in India: only one major massacre was recorded
during his long reign (1542-1605), when he ordered that about 30,000
captured Rajput Hindus be slain on February 24, 1568, after the battle
for Chitod. But Akbar�s acceptance of other religions and toleration of
their public worship, his abolition of poll-tax on non-Moslems, and his
interest in other faiths were not a reflection of his Moslem spirit of
tolerance. Quite the contrary, they indicated a propensity for
free-thinking in the realm of religion that finally led him to complete
apostasy. Its high points were the formal declaration of his own
infallibility in all matters of religious doctrine, his promulgation of
a new creed, and his adoption of Hindu and Zoroastrian festivals and
practices. This is a pattern one sees again and again in Moslem history,
down to the present day: whenever one finds a reasonable, enlightened,
tolerant Moslem, upon closer examination this turns out to be someone
who started out as a Moslem but then progressively wandered away from
the orthodox faith. That is to say: the best Moslems are generally the
least Moslem (a pattern which does not seem to be the case with other
religions.)
Things were back to normal under Shah Jahan (1593-1666), the fifth Mogul
Emperor and a grandson of Akbar the Great. Most Westerners remember him
as the builder of the Taj Mahal and have no idea that he was a cruel
warmonger who initiated forty-eight military campaigns against
non-Moslems in less than thirty years. Taking his cue from his Ottoman
co-religionists, on coming to the throne in 1628 he killed all his male
relations except one who escaped to Persia. Shah Jahan had 5,000
concubines in his harem, but nevertheless indulged in incestuous sex
with his daughters Chamani and Jahanara. During his reign in Benares
alone 76 Hindu temples were destroyed, as well as Christian churches at
Agra and Lahore. At the end of the siege of Hugh, a Portuguese enclave
near Calcutta, that lasted three months, he had ten thousand inhabitants
"blown up with powder, drowned in water or burnt by fire." Four thousand
were taken captive to Agra where they were offered Islam or death. Most
refused and were killed, except for the younger women, who went into harems.
These massacres perpetrated by Moslems in India are unparalleled in
history. In sheer numbers, they are bigger than the Jewish Holocaust,
the Soviet Terror, the Japanese massacres of the Chinese during WWII,
Mao�s devastations of the Chinese peasantry, the massacres of the
Armenians by the Turks, or any of the other famous crimes against
humanity of the 20th Century. But sadly, they are almost unknown outside
India.
There are several reasons for this. In the days when they ruled India,
the British, pursuing a policy of divide-and-rule, whitewashed the
record of the Moslems so that they could set them up as a counterbalance
to the more numerous Hindus. During the struggle for independence,
Gandhi and Nehru downplayed historic Moslem atrocities so that they
could pretend a facade of Hindu-Moslem unity against the British.
(Naturally, this fa�ade dissolved immediately after independence and
several million people were killed in the religious violence attendant
on splitting British India into India and Pakistan.) After independence,
Marxist Indian writers, blinkered by ideology, suppressed the truth
about the Moslem record because it did not fit into the Marxist theory
of history. Nowadays, the Indian equivalent of political correctness
downplays Moslem misdeeds because Moslems are an "oppressed minority" in
majority-Hindu India. And Indian leftist intellectuals always blame
India first and hate their own Hindu civilization, just their
equivalents at Berkeley blame America and the West.
Unlike Germany, which has apologized to its Jewish and Eastern European
victims, and Japan, which has at least behaved itself since WWII, and
even America, which has gone into paroxysms of guilt over what it did to
the infinitely smaller numbers of Red Indians, the Moslem aggressors
against India and their successors have not even stopped trying to
finish the job they started. To this day, militant Islam sees India as
"unfinished business" and it remains high on the agenda of oil-rich
Moslem countries such as Saudi Arabia, which are spending millions every
year trying to convert Hindus to Islam.
One may take some small satisfaction in the fact that they find it
rather slow going".
http://tinyurl.com/nazi-bedfellows