Obama's Government Becoming More And More Owellian. Democrat W.H. Now Asks Americans To Spy And Snitch On One Another To The Government
Crap Detector
socialized Medicare plan --a mob. This guy is really sinister and
and even many fellow blacks are turning against his totalitarian
predilections. If you think Hugo Chavez of Venezuela is dangerous, then be
wary
of B.O.
--
"Living well is the best revenge". George
Herbert, 17th century English clergyman
and metaphysical poet.
Harry Ballsack goes wild.........
"Crap Detector" <dete...@utopia.com> wrote in message
news:dXEem.500642$4p1.4...@en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com...
> The Obama Democrat W.H. has also called American citizens who don't like
his
> socialized Medicare plan --a mob.
Obama is a crack pot socilaist wanker who should be sent back to Kenyna to
molest his own kind..
boo-radley
<Harry.Ballsack.goes.wild@the..black..hole..wheresocilaistsplays.soc.not.net>
wrote:
> "Crap Detector" <detec...@utopia.com> wrote in message
>
> news:dXEem.500642$4p1.4...@en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com...
>
> > The Obama Democrat W.H. has also called American citizens who don't like
> his
> > socialized Medicare plan --a mob.
>
> Obama is a crack pot socilaist wanker who should be sent back to Kenyna to
> molest his own kind..
>
> This guy is really sinister and> and even many fellow blacks are turning against his totalitarian
> > predilections. If you think Hugo Chavez of Venezuela is dangerous, then be
> > wary
> > of B.O.
>
>
>
>
> > --
> > "Living well is the best revenge". George
> > Herbert, 17th century English clergyman
> > and metaphysical poet.
Faux Noise LOL
Miss Ann Thrope
> The Obama Democrat W.H. has also called American citizens who don't like his
> socialized Medicare plan --a mob. This guy is really sinister and
> and even many fellow blacks are turning against his totalitarian
> predilections. If you think Hugo Chavez of Venezuela is dangerous, then be
> wary
> of B.O.
>
>
> --
> "Living well is the best revenge". George
> Herbert, 17th century English clergyman
> and metaphysical poet.
What REALLY scary is the number of "Official Obama Scrotum Toters"
that don't see a bit of a problem with what their Messiah is up to.
The guy makes Chavez look ike a rank amateur. Do you think the Obots
would've stayed quiet if Bush/Cheney had attempted to shove the bilge
down our throats that Obama/Pelosi/Reid are doing?? OOOOHHHHH !!! THE
HUMANITY !!
The Rock
"Crap Detector" <dete...@utopia.com> wrote in message
news:dXEem.500642$4p1.4...@en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com...
The right has been throwing everything they got on the President and
Democrats, forgetting that they
had complete control of government for 8 years and what we got from it is a
destruction of our economy,
two wars, one without a cause, debt to our necks, not to mention our
reputation in the world.
--
www.lightningnews.com Lightning fast anonymous usenet downloads for 5$ only !
Ken
>
>
> "Crap Detector" <dete...@utopia.com> wrote in message
> news:dXEem.500642$4p1.4...@en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com...
>> The Obama Democrat W.H. has also called American citizens who don't
>> like his socialized Medicare plan --a mob. This guy is really sinister
>> and
>> and even many fellow blacks are turning against his totalitarian
>> predilections. If you think Hugo Chavez of Venezuela is dangerous,
>> then be wary
>> of B.O.
>>
>> http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/08/06/critics-accuse-white-house-playing-big-brother-health-care-debate/
>>
>>
>> --
>> "Living well is the best revenge". George
>> Herbert, 17th century English clergyman
>> and metaphysical poet.
> The right has been throwing everything they got on the President and
> Democrats, forgetting that they
> had complete control of government for 8 years and what we got from it
> is a destruction of our economy,
Didn't the democrats control the house and senate for the last two
years?? I believe those were the years that as you put it, "the
destruction of the economy" took place.
> two wars, one without a cause, debt to our necks, not to mention our
> reputation in the world.
>
>
>
And now that Obama is the president, things have improved?? Please
explain which things improved. I see the people finally saying they
have seen enough. The wheels are beginning to fall off this socialist
movement. Just go to one of those so called town meetings. People are
pissed!!
Ron
> socialized Medicare plan --a mob. This guy is really sinister and
> and even many fellow blacks are turning against his totalitarian
> predilections. If you think Hugo Chavez of Venezuela is dangerous, then be
> wary
> of B.O.
>
>
> --
> "Living well is the best revenge". George
> Herbert, 17th century English clergyman
> and metaphysical poet.
.
The purpose of flag @ whitehouse.gov is not to name Names. It is to
counter the lies and distortions that circulate like playground
rumors. If that were not the purpose of the email, then people like
Alex Jones, Lyndon LaRouche and The John Birch Society would have been
shut down long ago. The same goes for Limbaugh, Beck, Levin, Hannity,
Fox Cable News, etc.
All of the mentioned kooks are protected from any kind of retribution
by something called The First Amendment. You can say anything you
damned well please, print it, or broadcast it without fear of
prosecution by anybody.
RO
squirltop
Right wingers are just rabid fucking idiots that serve no useful
purpose in American politics.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vagD-4AH4Vc this is supposed to be for
supporting their candidate?
You right wingers need to start thinking and grow up.
Harry Ballsack goes wild.........
"Ron" <ron...@wt.net> wrote in message
news:084c485d-c3b0-4261...@g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
Really bubba, tell you what, let see what has really happened to the First
Amendment, then lets see your responce on this..
Say no to socialism say yes to freedom.
Yes this is Obama's great american legacy, .
SWAT team confronts Young Americans for Liberty
Jim Randleman
Young American for Liberty
August 3, 2009
I'm sitting in the back of the classroom on the final day of the YAL
National Convention, and I couldn't wait any longer to get this YouTube
video out to you.
Yesterday, YAL Events Director, Trevor Leach, and our top youth activists
demonstrated on the Washington, DC, National Mall to collect petitions in
opposition of Obama's government takeover of health-care.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNoBLa7lhXY
It wasn't long until a SWAT team in an armored truck threatened Trevor and
our youth activists declaring, "There are two options. Disassemble and
leave. Or y'all are going to jail."
"You don't have free speech," the sergeant told Trevor.
Fortunately, our youth activists video taped the entire confrontation and
stayed up all night to produce this video footage. Be prepared to be
shocked, appalled, and a little an gry at the actions of our public servants
who swore to uphold the U.S. Constitution.
After you watch this video, please do me a favor. Click here and donate
generously to support these youth activists and advance their continuous
efforts. It is important to me to get this video in your hands immediately.
I'll send a full update on the first-ever YAL National Convention later this
week.
Let me say, this weekend has impacted these students in a very large way.
For liberty,
Jeff Frazee
>You can say anything you
>damned well please, print it, or broadcast it without fear of
>prosecution by anybody.
Ya right, it depends who and what it is your taking about, as America has
become a police state
RO
Bret Cahill
> socialized Medicare plan --a mob.
Well?
How else are out of power Repugs going to get their way?
Bret Cahill
Fred Oinka
> The Obama Democrat W.H. has also called American citizens who don't like his
> socialized Medicare plan --a mob. This guy is really sinister and
> and even many fellow blacks are turning against his totalitarian
> predilections. If you think Hugo Chavez of Venezuela is dangerous, then be
> wary
> of B.O.
>
>
> --
> "Living well is the best revenge". George
> Herbert, 17th century English clergyman
> and metaphysical poet.
Too many people make the mistake of counting liberals among the human
race.
Bret Cahill
Try not to spree but if you must spree, spree local. Just shoot up
the trailer park.
Bret Cahill
Miss Ann Thrope
By giving you kooks on left all the rope you need to hang yourselves.
Miss Ann Thrope
>
> - Show quoted text -
We'll be sure and shoot your FEMA provided single-wide first. Ya'
might want to stock up on sandbags and railroad crossties before the
American people get REALLY pissed.
Tom Sr.
> On Aug 6, 2:06 pm, "Crap Detector" <detec...@utopia.com> wrote:
> > The Obama Democrat W.H. has also called American citizens
> > who don't like his socialized Medicare plan --a mob. This guy is
> > really sinister and and even many fellow blacks are turning against
> > his totalitarian predilections. If you think Hugo Chavez of Venezuela
> > is dangerous, then be wary of B.O.
> Too many people make the mistake of counting liberals among the human
> race.
According to "Crap Detector", *Jewish* people should not be accounted
among the human race as well.
----------
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.republicans/msg/5a64045c4c38019a?hl=en&dmode=source
On Jul 19, 11:25 am, Crap Detector <detec...@utopia.com> wrote:
I can tell you right now that Obama won't do anyting about the Jewish
problem because he's gutless and refuses to stand up to them.
Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell big lies. The Jewish
media took his words out of context and claimed that Hitler was in
favor of big lies. This was in itself a big lie and proof that Hitler
was right. Here is what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf and in context:.
"But it remained for the Jews, with their unqualified capacity for
falsehood, and their fighting comrades, the Marxists, to impute
responsiblity for the downfall precisely to the man who alone had
shown a superhuman will and energy in his effort to prevent the
catastrophe which he had forseen and to save the nation from that hour
of complete overthrow and shame. By placing responsiblity for the loss
of the world war on the shoulders of Ludendorff they took away the
weapon of moral right from the only adversary dangerous enough to be
likely to succeed in bringing the betrayers of the Fatherland to
justice. All this was inspired by the principle--which is quite true
in itself--that in the big lie there is always a certain force of
credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more
easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than
consciously or voluntarily, and thus in the primitive simplicity of
their minds they are more readily fall victims to the big lie than the
small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little
matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It
would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and
they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort
truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so
may be brought clearly to their minds, they still doubt and waver and
will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For
the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it
has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in
this world and to all who conspire together in tha art of lying. These
people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest
purposes.
"From time immemorial, however, the Jews have known better than any
others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited. Is not their very
existance founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a religious
community, whereas in reality they are a race? And what a race! One of
the greatest thinkers that mankind has produced has branded the Jews
for all time with a statement which is profoundly and exactly true. He
(Schopenhauer) called the Jew 'The Great Master of Lies'. Those who do
not realize the truth of that statement, or do not wish to believe it,
will never be able to lend a hand in helping Truth to prevail."
----------
And so FRED OINKA and HARRY BALLSACK and MISS ANN THROPE and KEN and
all the *other* far-far-right-wing, ultraconservative Republicans out
there on Usenet -- since you you *agree* with "Crap Detector" that
"Obama's Government Becoming More And More Owellian" -- do you ALSO
agree with Crap Detector and Aldoph Hitler about their shared opinion
regarding Jewish people?!
Do tell us, please.
-Tom Sr.
Ron
<Harry.Ballsack.goes.wild@the..black..hole..wheresocilaistsplays.soc.not.net>
wrote:
.
OK Harry....Listen carefully.... go to this web site and read some of
36 CFR 7.96 It is found at:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/18027745/36-CFR-796
Go to page 143 and begin reading. The National Park Service
regulations DO NOT PROHIBIT demonstrations, but rather specifies by
specific Washington DC street names and area WHERE such demonstrations
can be carried out. Do you see the word 'where'? The regulations
also specify that no permit for a demonstration is needed IF the
number of people involved is less than 25. That is why the uniformed
lady asked several times "How many people are here" and attempted to
count them. And by the way, the people in uniform are not "police".
They are from the National Park Service.
By using your logic, a demonstration could be carried out, waving
signs, and shouting, on the floor of the Senate.
You think like a child.
RO
Harry Ballsack goes wild.........
http://www.scribd.com/doc/18027745/36-CFR-796
..................
OK "Ron"....Listen carefully....
Now you think like a child, the page you gave doesn't list anything but park
rules and policys and the supreme law the constitution over rides your child
like thinking...and bullshit you want to peddle
The Supremacy Clause is a clause in the United States Constitution, article
VI, paragraph 2. The clause establishes the Constitution, Federal Statutes,
and U.S. treaties as "the supreme law of the land". The text establishes
these as the highest form of law in the American legal system, mandating
that state judges uphold them, even if state laws or constitutions conflict.
In other words bubba, This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States
which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which
shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the
supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound
thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the contrary
notwithstanding. "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge
the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States."
One of the earliest examples of the Supreme Court ruling that a state law
violated the constitution under the Supremacy Clause came in the landmark
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), wherein the court ruled that the state of
Maryland could not tax the Second Bank of the United States, establishing
the principle that the states could not tax the federal government.
In Edgar v. Mite Corporation, 457 U.S. 624 (1982), the Supreme Court ruled:
"A state statute is void to the extent that it actually conflicts with a
valid federal statute."
In effect, this means that a state law will be found violating the supremacy
clause when either of two conditions exists:[1]
1.. compliance with both federal and state law is impossible
2.. "...state law stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and
execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress..."
In a similar opinion, Stone v. City and County of San Francisco (968 F.2d
850, 862 (9th Cir. 1992)), the court held on the issue of injunction and
remediation, "otherwise valid state laws or court orders cannot stand in the
way of a federal court's remedial scheme if the action is essential to
enforce the scheme." In this case, prisoners suing for tort damages appealed
to federal remediation law, suggesting that in their case, federal law
applied (though it might not in every instance of remediation). The court
agreed and granted compensation where federal law was applicable.
PGE. v. State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, 461
U.S. 190 (1983) is a Supreme Court case that lays out a variety of tests
that may be used to determine if state statutes are superseded or preempted
by federal legislation. In this case, California blocked the building of
Atomic Energy facilities. PGE contested that the State's injuntion was
preempted by the federal Atomic Energy Act. It was held that the Act does
indeed hold supremacy over California, but the State's specific barring of
the plants did not violate the Act, or specifically, because the state
stoped the plants because of economic, rather than safety reasons, the Act
was not violated.
The Massachusetts Burma Law was a law enacted in 1996 by the Massachusetts
legislature limiting state entities from purchasing services from companies
doing business with Myanmar (Burma) for moral reasons. The NFTC filed suit
against then-Massachusetts Secretary of Administration and Finance, Stephen
Crosby, in Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council, 530 U.S. 363 (2000),
arguing that the Massachusetts law infringed upon the federal government's
foreign affairs and foreign commerce powers, and that it was already
pre-empted by federal law. Massachusetts was also charged with violating the
Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The NFTC won the case with U.S.
Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter ruling that "the state Act is
preempted, and its application unconstitutional, under the Supremacy
Clause." The law was thus nullified.
But you socilaist terrorist types beleive that any government offical or
police is above the law, and can act out anyway it wants and can act with
force and with the use of terrorism to justify a police state retardation.
The main problem with you and idiots like you, is your wrong and police
thugs can't violate any law as they choose.
now dimwit, watch the video again and look to see who is the terrorists and
those just excerising their rights and freedoms.....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNoBLa7lhXY
Ron
<Harry.Ballsack.goes.wild@the..black..hole..wheresocilaistsplays.soc.not.net>
wrote:
> "Ron" <ron...@wt.net> wrote in message
>
> news:ec9eff57-62bb-4a2b...@l5g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 6, 11:43 pm, "Harry Ballsack goes wild........."
>
> - Show quoted text -
.
I repeat:
The National Park Service regulations DO NOT PROHIBIT demonstrations,
but rather specifies by specific Washington DC street names and area
WHERE such demonstrations can be carried out.
The National Park Service has been an arm of the Federal Government
since 1916, and if a conflict existed between NPS regulations and the
Constitution, such regulations would have been struck down by now.
You don't have to convince me of the supremacy of the Constitution. I
strongly support that. You DO have to demonstrate a conflict between
the NPS regulating the STREET ADDRESS of a peaceful demonstration in
Washington and the Constitution. None of the cases you cited did so.
Try again.
RO
Harry Ballsack goes wild.........
And I repeat you dumb-ass fish-head, Park regulations are not the supreme
law of the land, where as the United States Constitution is ....but since
you don't understand that,,,,and violating people's rights for your
socilaist politicians who are revealing their plans to make it more
difficult to exercise the fundamental constitutional rights to free speech,
peaceful assembly and free expression, shows that your socilaist utopia
world is crumbing and people will fight back to preserve their rights and
freedoms from you kooks who defend government terrorism.
Yes by all means call the Gestapo with amuor truck, it shows how fightened
you freaks are, if people are excising their rights and freedom to protest
against the government, it also helps people see that all citizen's need to
take to arms against government terrorism and why it needs to be done.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNoBLa7lhXY
If you must smoke that crack you are using, at least get your head out of
your ass and stop pretending you are some kind of save the tree kook with
National Park Service regulations .
And since you removed this.... I'll post it again so everyone in the world
can see what kind of kooks you really are.
You socilaist terrorist types beleive that any government offical or police
is above the law, and can act out anyway it wants and can act with force and
with the use of terrorism, to justify a police state retardation.
The main problem with you and idiots like you, is your wrong and police
thugs can't violate any surpreme law as they choose.
Now dimwit, watch the video again and look to see who is the terrorists and
Ron
<Harry.Ballsack.goes.wild@the..black..hole..wheresocilaistsplays.soc.not.net>
wrote:
> "Ron" <ron...@wt.net> wrote in message
>
.
.
Once more, and s-l-o-w-l-y: Show all of us where the NPS regulations
are in conflict with the Constitution. In all your ranting, you have
not done so.
The only thing you have done is express your own interpretation of the
Constitution. If we take your interpretation to be true, then the
floors of Congress are open to your protest. However, I doubt that
the NPS has jurisdiction over the Houses of Congress. Some other
federally enacted rules apply. Aha! But not to YOU.
You think like a child. A petulant child.
(And I have watched your YouTube video. Three times.)
RO
Harry Ballsack goes wild.........
"Dimwit Ronny" <ron...@wt.net> wrote in message
news:51d313db-5246-4d16...@l5g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
>Once more, and s-l-o-w-l-y: Show all of us where the NPS regulations
>are in conflict with the Constitution.
Do you grasp this and what it means dork... To exercise the "fundamental
constitutional rights to free speech, peaceful assembly and free
expression"..... I don't think you do, but I will tell you, it mean's it is
guaranteed by the highest law in the land.. It called the U.S. Constitution
and is in the first admendment rights.... You freedom hater socilaist
dimwits who want a police state mentaility are not going to get what you
want,
The Supreme Law the US Constitution over rides your NPS reglations
fluff..that amount to nothing more then some jerk off like you thinking you
have a right just like that big mouth cop who is nothing but a scared wanker
when it comes down to the truth.....and to prove my point I gave you case
law from the highest court in the land which you ignored as a good little
fascist socilaist dimwit....but since you don't understand that....and you
believe that violating people's god given rights for your socilaist
politicians, who are brain-dead like you are.. when it comes to exercising
the "fundamental constitutional rights to free speech, peaceful assembly and
free expression", shows that your socilaist utopia world is crumbing and
people will fight back to preserve their rights and freedoms from you kooks
who defend government terrorism.
Now go fuck off you kook, as you are not that bright...you kinda remind
myself of that moron, Kent..who's as stpuid as they come....
Ron
<Harry.Ballsack.goes.wild@the..black..hole..wheresocilaistsplays.soc.not.net>
wrote:
> "Dimwit Ronny" <ron...@wt.net> wrote in message
>
> news:51d313db-5246-4d16...@l5g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
>
> >Once more, and s-l-o-w-l-y: Show all of us where the NPS regulations
> >are in conflict with the Constitution.
>
> Do you grasp this and what it means dork... To exercise the "fundamental
> constitutional rights to free speech, peaceful assembly and free
> expression"..... I don't think you do, but I will tell you, it mean's it is
.
.
Re: The Supreme Law the US Constitution over rides your NPS reglations
fluff.
ONLY if there is a conflict between the Constitution and the NPS
regulation spelled out in 36 CFR 7.96 , THEN the Constitution
prevails.
I'm asking you to cite that alleged conflict, not simply voice your
own interpretations of 36 CFR 7.96 and how it pertains to the First
Amendment. Tell me how the NPS limiting demonstrations to specific
addresses and locations in DC is a violation of the Constitution.
Nota Bene: Limited to SPECIFIC areas and locations on the Mall.
Still waiting......
RO