Tiger Woods and MK-Ultra
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
http://deadmanmusings.blogspot.com/2009/12/tiger-woods-professional-
athletes-and.html
Tiger Woods, it is reported, was raised through the MK Ultra program. J.
Lee said the following:
"Eldrick Tont "Tiger" Woods is HATED by other golfers, who know he's a
manufactured product of Pentagon MKULTRA mind control. I was told this by
a pro golfer while we were at an aircraft factory in Oregon hand-building
our own personal jet aircraft.
Baby Tiger's colonel Green Beret Special Forces Vietnam baby-killer daddy
hired a military drill instructor to scream at him while putting and
swinging. "Tiger's" parents ancestry is from [Communist] China and
[Communist] Thailand, home of Manchurian Candidates, so "Tiger" is only
1/4 black. "Tiger" is a Buddhist who "studied" with monks at monestaries
in [Communist] Asia. Since his mommy is a Thai citizen, "Tiger" is a
citizen of Communist Thailand. "Tiger" is named for a South Vietnamese
army officer who assassinated 50,000 South Vietnamese government
employees who opposed the Communists of the New World Order (Phoenix
Program). (source)............
"Tiger" first played golf at age 3 on the Bob Hope TV Show. Bob Hope is a
notorious MKULTRA programmer and pedophile CIA sexslave handler.
Homosexual rape is required by MKULTRA as torture to create multiple
personalities, often on military bases, as proven in the Franklin Cover-
up. (ibid)
In my opinion, Tiger Woods has reached the magical age where his
programming is probably breaking down and cannot be repaired. Thus the
Illuminati create a way for his exit that is both instructive and banal.
The cheating husband makes people think that Americans are a nation of
sex-crazed lunatics that get filthy rich and start cheating on their wive
(snip)
----------------------------------------
Interesting article but midway thru the author destroys his own
credibility when he talks about how tiger can routinely hit a 3wood 420
yards!!!
BDK
@yahoo.com says...
BWHAHAHAHA!
That article is as crazy as Nancy's stuff.
I'm amazed you aren't swallowing it completely. You must be having an
exceptional day.
--
BDK..
Leader of the nonexistent paid shills.
Non Jew Jew Club founding member.
Former number one Kook Magnet, title passed to Iarnrod.
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
news:MPG.258f75a63...@news.buckeye-express.com:
>>
>
> BWHAHAHAHA!
>
> That article is as crazy as Nancy's stuff.
>
> I'm amazed you aren't swallowing it completely. You must be having an
> exceptional day.
>
For 15 years David Icke has been writing about how organizations like the
CIA give people multiple personalities and turn them into manchurian
candidates. Wouldn't surprise me. Many of the world leaders seem to be
robots.
lorad
I don't know about the mk-ultra stuff... but I routinely can smack
golf balls at driving ranges to 390 yards... and I don't even play
golf (maybe once every two years or so)
JohnO
Midway? ROTFLMAO!!!!
BDK
@yahoo.com says...
BWHAHAHAHA!
It wouldn't surprise me that you would take Icke seriously, and believe
in his horseshit. Batshit crazy loons often believe in all kinds of
stuff, don't you?
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
> I don't know about the mk-ultra stuff... but I routinely can smack
> golf balls at driving ranges to 390 yards... and I don't even play
> golf (maybe once every two years or so)
Oh yeah. So can i.
williemeikle
<xeton2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> BDK <TopSh...@sanity.com> wrote innews:MPG.258f75a63...@news.buckeye-express.com:
Yes, but David Icke is a loon.
curtjester1
I don't have headphones here, so you can tell me how the Tavisstock
tournament is tied into all the laser zapping sites.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzXYyhmv-Ug
CJ
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
So why are you so scared of him?
BDK
67c611...@k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>, bet...@earthlink.net
says...
Why would anyone be scared of him, unless you were locked into a small
room with him and, he was cutting up meat or vegetables with a large
knife?
williemeikle
Scared of the ex-Coventry City goalkeeper? Give me a break. I've seen
scarier things on Sesame Street.
He's so far up himself it's hilarious. I remember him when he was a
soccer player then a TV sports pundit. He didn't make much sense then
either, but at least he was -nearly- believable.
Or do you really think the British Royal Family are giant reptiles?
Willie
FACE
Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <bet...@earthlink.net>, wrote
Three miles here. Most ranges banned me after I killed a kid in the next
county with a golf ball.............
BDK
AFaceIn...@today.net says...
> On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:24:56 -0800 (PST), in alt.politics, "Speeders &
> Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <bet...@earthlink.net>, wrote
>
> >
> >> I don't know about the mk-ultra stuff... but I routinely can smack
> >> golf balls at driving ranges to 390 yards... and I don't even play
> >> golf (maybe once every two years or so)
> >
> >Oh yeah. So can i.
>
> Three miles here. Most ranges banned me after I killed a kid in the next
> county with a golf ball.............
>
>
I wondered where you've been, Mr. Munster.
Harold Burton
<d63279a4-183b-446a...@n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
"Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <bet...@earthlink.net>
wrote:
I can smack them 400 yards, easy.
Snicker.
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
news:e2007987-fe88-4482...@h2g2000vbd.googlegroups.com:
>
> Scared of the ex-Coventry City goalkeeper? Give me a break. I've seen
> scarier things on Sesame Street.
>
> He's so far up himself it's hilarious. I remember him when he was a
> soccer player then a TV sports pundit. He didn't make much sense then
> either, but at least he was -nearly- believable.
>
> Or do you really think the British Royal Family are giant reptiles?
>
Do you really think there were nuclear weapons in iraq and do you really
think on 911, three skyscrapers collapsed straight down at free fall speed
because planes hit two of them?? HAHAHA
Harold Burton
"Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <xeto...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> williemeikle <meikle...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> news:e2007987-fe88-4482...@h2g2000vbd.googlegroups.com:
>
>
> >
> > Scared of the ex-Coventry City goalkeeper? Give me a break. I've seen
> > scarier things on Sesame Street.
> >
> > He's so far up himself it's hilarious. I remember him when he was a
> > soccer player then a TV sports pundit. He didn't make much sense then
> > either, but at least he was -nearly- believable.
> >
> > Or do you really think the British Royal Family are giant reptiles?
> >
>
> Do you really think there were nuclear weapons in iraq
Ask Bill Clinton:
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.
That
is our bottom line."
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998-Truth!
This was a quote from President Clinton during a presentation at the
Pentagon defending a decision to conduct military strikes against Iraq.
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear.
We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass
destruction program."
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998-Truth!
Bill Clinton went to the Pentagon on this occasion to be briefed by top
military officials about Iraq and weapons of mass destruction.
His remarks followed that briefing.
"Iraq is a long way from USA but, what happens there matters a great deal
here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear,
chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest
security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998-Truth!
This is a quote from Albright during an appearance at Ohio State
University
by Albright, who was Secretary of State for Bill Clinton.
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times
since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998-Truth!
This was at the same Ohio State University appearance as Madeline
Albright.
"We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S.Constitution and Laws, to take necessary actions, (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
mass
destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle,
John
Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998-Truth!
According to the U.S. Senate website, the text of this letter was signed
by
several Senators, both Democrat and Republican, including Senator John
McCain and Joseph Lieberman.
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and
he
has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998-Truth!
The text of this statement by Nancy Pelosi is posted on her congressional
website.
"Hussein has .. chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999-Truth!
This was from an appearance Albright made in Chicago.
She was addressing the embargo of Iraq that was in effect at the time and
criticism that it may have prevented needed medical supplies from getting
into the country. Albright said, "There has never been an embargo
against
food and medicine. It's just that Hussein has just not chosen to spend
his
money on that. Instead, he has chosen to spend his money on building
weapons
of mass destruction, and palaces for his cronies."
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons
programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs
continue a pace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition,
Saddam
continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover
of a
licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten
the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others,
December 5, 2001Truth!
The only letter with this quote from December 5, 2001 that we could find
did
not include the participation of Senator Bob Graham, but it was signed
nine
other senators including Democrat Joe Lieberman.
It urged President Bush to take quicker action against Iraq.
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandated
of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the
means of delivering them."
Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002-Truth!
These were remarks from Senator Levin to a Senate committee on that date.
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002-Truth!
This and the quote below was part of prepared remarks for a speech in San
Francisco to The Commonwealth Club.
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to
deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam
is in
power."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002-Truth!
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and
developing
weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002-Truth!
Part of a speech he gave at Johns Hopkins.
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998.
We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical
and
biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to
build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence
reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002-Truth!
On the floor of the Senate during debate over the resolution that would
authorize using force against Iraq.
He was urging caution about going to war and commented that even though
there was confidence about the weapons in Iraq, there had not been the
need
to take military action for a number of years and he asked why there
would
be the need at that point.
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority
to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe
that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a
real
and grave threat to our security."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002-Truth!
Senator Kerry's comments were made to the Senate as part of the same
debate
over the resolution to use force against Saddam Hussein.
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working
aggressively
to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within
the
next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated
the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass
destruction."
Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002-Truth!
Senator Rockefeller's statements were a part of the debate over using
force
against Saddam Hussein.
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years,
every
significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy
his
chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has
refused to do" Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002-Truth!
Senator Waxman's contribution to the Senate debate over going to war.
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show
that
Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons
stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has
also
given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda
members.
It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will
continue
to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and
will
keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002-Truth!
Senator Clinton acknowledged the threat of Saddam Hussein but said she
did
not feel that using force at that time was a good option.
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime He presents a
particularly
grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ...
And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit
and
his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real
..."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan.23.2003-Truth!
In a speech to Georgetown University.
Snicker.
Bradley K. Sherman
Harold Burton <hal.i....@hotmail.com> wrote:
>In article <Xns9CE1C6B8D58BDr...@216.168.3.70>,
> "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <xeto...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> Do you really think there were nuclear weapons in iraq
>
>Ask Bill Clinton:
>
Yup, we should *thank* Bill Clinton for doing his damned job
and making sure there weren't any. When Clinton did send
in the troops in the Balkans *not one single US soldier died*.
Bush can only dream of that kind of success.
--bks
lorad
> In article <Xns9CE1C6B8D58BDriemann1850yahoo...@216.168.3.70>,
> "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <xeton2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > williemeikle <meiklewill...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>
> - Show quoted text -
Easy answer to all that... they are all neocon lackeys... just like
the Bush CIA-Neocon family.
lorad
There is no other easy answer to it than that one.
Explain how else they could look so ugly without being alien
reptilians.
PS: Cheney is the worst though.. I saw a picture of him tearing his
human mask off.
williemeikle
<xeton2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
I'll take that as a yes then. You are obviously as deluded as Icke is.
I can get you a good tin foil hat. Only $200 and will last for at
least six months.
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
>
> Yup, we should *thank* Bill Clinton for doing his damned job
> and making sure there weren't any. When Clinton did send
> in the troops in the Balkans *not one single US soldier died*.
> Bush can only dream of that kind of success.
>
> --bks
Yeah but clinton murdered hundreds of thousands of civilians. He's a
mass-murdering psychopath same as bush.
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
>
> I'll take that as a yes then. You are obviously as deluded as Icke is.
> I can get you a good tin foil hat. Only $200 and will last for at
> least six months.
HAHAHA. Once again the govt shills are telling us THERE ARE NO
CONSPIRACIES IN AMERICA. You guys are hilarious.
williemeikle
Yet strangely still not as hilarious as either you or David Icke.
BDK
@g26g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, bet...@earthlink.net says...
Hundreds of thousands of civilians where exactly?
Hoping it will be another of your "klassics"...
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
> In article <c42e4229-852f-4219-9558-2f5d449a5e08
>
> > On Dec 14, 8:28 pm, b...@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) wrote:
>
> > > Yup, we should *thank* Bill Clinton for doing his damned job
> > > and making sure there weren't any. When Clinton did send
> > > in the troops in the Balkans *not one single US soldier died*.
> > > Bush can only dream of that kind of success.
>
> > > --bks
>
> > Yeah but clinton murdered hundreds of thousands of civilians. He's a
> > mass-murdering psychopath same as bush.
>
> Hundreds of thousands of civilians where exactly?
>
> Hoping it will be another of your "klassics"...
Hey stupid. Don't you know about his bombing of eastern europe.? He
also bombed iraq nearly every day for 8 years and also hit the country
with sanctions. In 1996 madeliene albright admitted on "60 minutes"
that america had killed 500,000 iraqi CHILDREN!!
BDK
@h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, bet...@earthlink.net says...
> On Dec 15, 12:25 pm, BDK <TopSh...@sanity.com> wrote:
> > In article <c42e4229-852f-4219-9558-2f5d449a5e08
> > @g26g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, beta...@earthlink.net says...
> >
> > > On Dec 14, 8:28 pm, b...@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) wrote:
> >
> > > > Yup, we should *thank* Bill Clinton for doing his damned job
> > > > and making sure there weren't any. When Clinton did send
> > > > in the troops in the Balkans *not one single US soldier died*.
> > > > Bush can only dream of that kind of success.
> >
> > > > --bks
> >
> > > Yeah but clinton murdered hundreds of thousands of civilians. He's a
> > > mass-murdering psychopath same as bush.
> >
> > Hundreds of thousands of civilians where exactly?
> >
> > Hoping it will be another of your "klassics"...
>
> Hey stupid. Don't you know about his bombing of eastern europe.?
Bombing of Eastern Europe? Yugoslavia?
> He also bombed iraq nearly every day for 8 years and also hit the country
> with sanctions. In 1996 madeliene albright admitted on "60 minutes"
> that america had killed 500,000 iraqi CHILDREN!!
>
You meant the military killed hundreds of thousands?
Over the top you go, like always. There's no halfways sane for you, is
there, Speedy?
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
> In article <60d60b39-26d8-43f6-afe1-c119641e4df2
> @h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, beta...@earthlink.net says...
>
> > Hey stupid. Don't you know about his bombing of eastern europe.?
>
> Bombing of Eastern Europe? Yugoslavia?
>
> > He also bombed iraq nearly every day for 8 years and also hit the country
> > with sanctions. In 1996 madeliene albright admitted on "60 minutes"
> > that america had killed 500,000 iraqi CHILDREN!!
>
> You meant the military killed hundreds of thousands?
>
HAHAHAHA. Is that all you got.?? Clinton gave the order but didn't
actually drop the bombs personally so he's in the clear? HAHAHA
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
> "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <beta...@earthlink.net> wrote in
> Hey stupid. Don't you know about his bombing of eastern europe.? He
> also bombed iraq nearly every day for 8 years and also hit the country
> with sanctions. In 1996 madeliene albright admitted on "60 minutes"
> that america had killed 500,000 iraqi CHILDREN!!
>
> ****************************************************
>
> Those numbers were greatly exaggerated and we now know that NATO killed them
> with their Oil for Food scams.
Hey stupid. So why didn't Albright ADMIT to the 500,000 child
murders.?
BDK
19g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, bet...@earthlink.net says...
By your "logic", every POTUS is/has been guilty of "murder". How
ridiculous.
You need to a least take a look at reality, just once before you check
out. I have no idea how old you are, but you never know how much time
you have left, so get going.
Harold Burton
<c42e4229-852f-4219...@g26g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
"Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <bet...@earthlink.net>
wrote:
> mass-murdering psychopath same as bush. . .
. . . Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
Snicker.
Harold Burton
BDK <TopS...@sanity.com> wrote:
> In article <88b292e0-7d6a-4cd9-b352-1f768e720714@
> 19g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, bet...@earthlink.net says...
> > On Dec 16, 12:02�am, BDK <TopSh...@sanity.com> wrote:
> > > In article <60d60b39-26d8-43f6-afe1-c119641e4df2
> > > @h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, beta...@earthlink.net says...
> >
> > >
> > > > Hey stupid. Don't you know about his bombing of eastern europe.? �
> > >
> > > Bombing of Eastern Europe? Yugoslavia?
> > >
> > > > He also bombed iraq nearly every day for 8 years and also hit the
> > > > country
> > > > with sanctions. �In 1996 madeliene albright admitted on "60 minutes"
> > > > that america had killed 500,000 iraqi CHILDREN!!
> > >
> > > You meant the military killed hundreds of thousands?
> > >
> >
> > HAHAHAHA. Is that all you got.?? Clinton gave the order but didn't
> > actually drop the bombs personally so he's in the clear? HAHAHA
> >
>
> By your "logic", every POTUS is/has been guilty of "murder".
Not every one, but certainly Roosevelt, Truman, and Johnson
> How ridiculous.
Not at all.
Snicker.
BDK
hal.i....@hotmail.com says...
LOL, you're as whacked as Speedy is.
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
> "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <beta...@earthlink.net> wrote in
>
> Hey stupid. So why didn't Albright ADMIT to the 500,000 child
> murders.?
>
> ******************************************************
>
> So now you are saying she did not admit it? That makes more sense, because
> it never happened.
OMG - i made a typo and now this loony wants to shoot me. HAHAHA.
Everyone but you can see i meant "did". And she did do it. Right on
"60 minutes". Here's a link.
BDK
ffe778...@u18g2000pro.googlegroups.com>, bet...@earthlink.net
says...
And of course, you ignore her explanation of it. That's what you always
do, isn't it, Speedy?
Harold Burton
BDK <TopS...@sanity.com> wrote:
so you're whacked enough to believe that deliberately bombing innocent
women and children isn't murder?
Snicker.
Harold Burton
BDK <TopS...@sanity.com> wrote:
> In article <86763045-df9d-4b55-80a8-
> ffe778...@u18g2000pro.googlegroups.com>, bet...@earthlink.net
> says...
> > On Dec 16, 12:28�pm, "Moderate" <no_spam_@no_mail.com> wrote:
> > > "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" <beta...@earthlink.net> wrote in
> >
> > >
> > > Hey stupid. �So why didn't Albright ADMIT to the 500,000 child
> > > murders.?
> > >
> > > ******************************************************
> > >
> > > So now you are saying she did not admit it? �That makes more sense,
> > > because
> > > it never happened.
> >
> > OMG - i made a typo and now this loony wants to shoot me. HAHAHA.
> > Everyone but you can see i meant "did". And she did do it. Right on
> > "60 minutes". Here's a link.
> >
> > http://home.comcast.net/~dhamre/docAlb.htm
> >
>
> And of course, you ignore her explanation of it.
And that "explanation" is? In you own words.
Snicker
FACE
<hal.i....@hotmail.com>, wrote
>> > Not every one, but certainly Roosevelt, Truman, and Johnson
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > How ridiculous.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Not at all.
>> >
>> >
>> > Snicker.
>> >
>>
>>
>> LOL, you're as whacked as Speedy is.
>
>
>
>so you're whacked enough to believe that deliberately bombing innocent
>women and children isn't murder?
>
>
>
>Snicker.
A classic strawman.
In fact, it follows almost to a T the example often given..............
Howard Brazee
<hal.i....@hotmail.com> wrote:
>so you're whacked enough to believe that deliberately bombing innocent
>women and children isn't murder?
Those who make the laws define what is murder.
--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."
- James Madison
BDK
It happens when the military is used, always has, always will. Live with
it.
BDK
hal.i....@hotmail.com says...
It's right there on the damn page?
How lazy can you get?
Harold Burton
BDK <TopS...@sanity.com> wrote:
I do, it's the leftards who've been whining about all the Iraqis that
President Bush allegedly "murdered".
snicker.
Harold Burton
FACE <AFaceIn...@today.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:46:15 -0500, in alt.politics, Harold Burton
> <hal.i....@hotmail.com>, wrote
>
> >> > Not every one, but certainly Roosevelt, Truman, and Johnson
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > How ridiculous.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Not at all.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Snicker.
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> LOL, you're as whacked as Speedy is.
> >
> >
> >
> >so you're whacked enough to believe that deliberately bombing innocent
> >women and children isn't murder?
> >
> >
> >
> >Snicker.
>
> A classic strawman.
Therefore you should be able to easily refute it. . . but you couldn't.
Snicker.
Harold Burton
BDK <TopS...@sanity.com> wrote:
What part of "in your own words" didn't you understand?
Snicker.
FACE
<hal.i....@hotmail.com>, wrote
>In article <ta7ni51b5b53qggqc...@4ax.com>,
> FACE <AFaceIn...@today.net> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:46:15 -0500, in alt.politics, Harold Burton
>> <hal.i....@hotmail.com>, wrote
>>
>> >> > Not every one, but certainly Roosevelt, Truman, and Johnson
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > > How ridiculous.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Not at all.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Snicker.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> LOL, you're as whacked as Speedy is.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >so you're whacked enough to believe that deliberately bombing innocent
>> >women and children isn't murder?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Snicker.
>>
>> A classic strawman.
>
>
>Therefore you should be able to easily refute it. . . but you couldn't.
Apparently you do not realize how childishly and transparently fallacious
it is.
Try to troll someone your own speed..............
>
>
>
>Snicker.
BDK
BDK
I understood it fine. But I didn't see any need to do it.
Harold Burton
FACE <AFaceIn...@today.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:10:24 -0500, in alt.politics, Harold Burton
> <hal.i....@hotmail.com>, wrote
>
> >In article <ta7ni51b5b53qggqc...@4ax.com>,
> > FACE <AFaceIn...@today.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:46:15 -0500, in alt.politics, Harold Burton
> >> <hal.i....@hotmail.com>, wrote
> >>
> >> >> > Not every one, but certainly Roosevelt, Truman, and Johnson
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > > How ridiculous.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Not at all.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Snicker.
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> LOL, you're as whacked as Speedy is.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >so you're whacked enough to believe that deliberately bombing innocent
> >> >women and children isn't murder?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Snicker.
> >>
> >> A classic strawman.
> >Therefore you should be able to easily refute it. . . but you couldn't.
>
> Apparently you do not realize how childishly and transparently fallacious...
... is your continued refusal to actually refute what you claim is a
"strawman"...
Snicker.
Harold Burton
BDK <TopS...@sanity.com> wrote:
I'm not talking to anyone, I'm posting to rec.sport.golf,
alt.conspiracy, alt.politics, talk.politics.misc, soc.culture.usa
Harold Burton
BDK <TopS...@sanity.com> wrote:
Try it and maybe you'll figure it out.
Snicker.
FACE
<hal.i....@hotmail.com>, wrote
>In article <38koi5h3ul6h04lj6...@4ax.com>,
> FACE <AFaceIn...@today.net> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:10:24 -0500, in alt.politics, Harold Burton
>> <hal.i....@hotmail.com>, wrote
>>
>> >In article <ta7ni51b5b53qggqc...@4ax.com>,
>> > FACE <AFaceIn...@today.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:46:15 -0500, in alt.politics, Harold Burton
>> >> <hal.i....@hotmail.com>, wrote
>> >>
>> >> >> > Not every one, but certainly Roosevelt, Truman, and Johnson
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > > How ridiculous.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Not at all.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Snicker.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> LOL, you're as whacked as Speedy is.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >so you're whacked enough to believe that deliberately bombing innocent
>> >> >women and children isn't murder?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >Snicker.
>> >>
>> >> A classic strawman.
>
>
>> >Therefore you should be able to easily refute it. . . but you couldn't.
>>
>> Apparently you do not realize how childishly and transparently fallacious
>>it is.
>
>>Try to troll someone your own speed..............
>>
>
>
>
>... is your continued refusal to actually refute what you claim is a
>"strawman"...
>
>
>
>Snicker.
Go fuck yourself, you childish asswipe,
FACE
<hal.i....@hotmail.com>, wrote
>In article <ta7ni51b5b53qggqc...@4ax.com>,
> FACE <AFaceIn...@today.net> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:46:15 -0500, in alt.politics, Harold Burton
>> <hal.i....@hotmail.com>, wrote
>>
>> >> > Not every one, but certainly Roosevelt, Truman, and Johnson
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > > How ridiculous.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Not at all.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Snicker.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> LOL, you're as whacked as Speedy is.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >so you're whacked enough to believe that deliberately bombing innocent
>> >women and children isn't murder?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Snicker.
>>
>> A classic strawman.
>
>
>Therefore you should be able to easily refute it. . . but you couldn't.
Apparently you do not realize how childishly and transparently fallacious
it is.
Try to troll someone your own speed..............
>
>
>
>Snicker.
FACE
<hal.i....@hotmail.com>, wrote
>> > Not every one, but certainly Roosevelt, Truman, and Johnson
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > How ridiculous.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Not at all.
>> >
>> >
>> > Snicker.
>> >
>>
>>
>> LOL, you're as whacked as Speedy is.
>
>
>
>so you're whacked enough to believe that deliberately bombing innocent
>women and children isn't murder?
>
>
>
>Snicker.
A classic strawman.
FACE
<hal.i....@hotmail.com>, wrote
>In article <MPG.259646942...@news.buckeye-express.com>,
The idiot with the nym harold burton uses a classic strawman.
"A straw man argument is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of
an opponent's position.[1] To "attack a straw man" is to create the
illusion of having refuted a proposition by substituting a superficially
similar proposition (the "straw man"), and refuting it, without ever
having actually refuted the original position.[1] [2]"
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Snicker.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > It happens when the military is used, always has, always will. Live with
>> > > it.
>> >
>> >
>> > I do, it's the leftards who've been whining about all the Iraqis that
>> > President Bush allegedly "murdered".
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > snicker.
>> >
>>
>> Then why are you talking to me about it?
>
>
>I'm not talking to anyone, I'm posting to rec.sport.golf,
>alt.conspiracy, alt.politics, talk.politics.misc, soc.culture.usa
Hey, shit-for-brains, you have been very dishonest -- in particular in
changing my post to make it read like you wanted instead of as it was.
You are a low-life fucker and a troll -- and not a very good troll.
Is rec.sport.golf your counting group?
Is rising to the level of a piece of shit your goal in life?
BDK
You're confused again. Come back after your nap.
Harold Burton
BDK <TopS...@sanity.com> wrote:
> I'm confused again. I'll come back after my nap.
Snicker.
Harold Burton
FACE <AFaceIn...@today.net> wrote:
> Go fuck yourself, you childish asswipe,
Snicker.
Harold Burton
FACE <AFaceIn...@today.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:10:24 -0500, in alt.politics, Harold Burton
> <hal.i....@hotmail.com>, wrote
>
> >In article <ta7ni51b5b53qggqc...@4ax.com>,
> > FACE <AFaceIn...@today.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:46:15 -0500, in alt.politics, Harold Burton
> >> <hal.i....@hotmail.com>, wrote
> >>
> >> >> > Not every one, but certainly Roosevelt, Truman, and Johnson
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > > How ridiculous.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Not at all.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Snicker.
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> LOL, you're as whacked as Speedy is.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >so you're whacked enough to believe that deliberately bombing innocent
> >> >women and children isn't murder?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Snicker.
> >>
> >> A classic strawman.
> >
> >
> >Therefore you should be able to easily refute it. . . but you couldn't.
> Apparently you do...realize how childishly and transparently fallacious...
...your inability to refute my claim is.
Snicker.
Harold Burton
FACE <AFaceIn...@today.net> wrote:
Must be why you can't actually refute my claim that Roosevelt, Truman,
and Johnson are as much murderers as Clinton is.
Snicker.
Harold Burton
FACE <AFaceIn...@today.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:46:15 -0500, in alt.politics, Harold Burton
> <hal.i....@hotmail.com>, wrote
>
> >> > Not every one, but certainly Roosevelt, Truman, and Johnson
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > How ridiculous.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Not at all.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Snicker.
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> LOL, you're as whacked as Speedy is.
> >
> >
> >
> >so you're whacked enough to believe that deliberately bombing innocent
> >women and children isn't murder?
> >
> >
> >
> >Snicker.
>
> A classic strawman....
...that you can't refute.
Snicker.
FACE
<hal.i....@hotmail.com>, wrote
>In article <orusi5p7cp2hai25a...@4ax.com>,
> FACE <AFaceIn...@today.net> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 10:22:43 -0500, in alt.politics, Harold Burton
>> <hal.i....@hotmail.com>, wrote
>>
>> >In article <MPG.259646942...@news.buckeye-express.com>,
>> > BDK <TopS...@sanity.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> In article <hal.i.burton-3243...@news.newsguy.com>,
>> >> hal.i....@hotmail.com says...
>> >> > In article <MPG.259596901...@news.buckeye-express.com>,
>> >> > BDK <TopS...@sanity.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > In article <hal.i.burton-D128...@news.newsguy.com>,
>> >> > > hal.i....@hotmail.com says...
>> >> > > > In article <MPG.259361f02...@news.buckeye-express.com>,
>> >> > > > BDK <TopS...@sanity.com> wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > > In article <hal.i.burton-38C9...@news.newsguy.com>,
>> >> > > > > hal.i....@hotmail.com says...
>> >> > > > > > In article
>> >> > > > > > <MPG.2592f542d...@news.buckeye-express.com>,
>> >> > > > > > BDK <TopS...@sanity.com> wrote:
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > In article <88b292e0-7d6a-4cd9-b352-1f768e720714@
>> >> > > > > > > 19g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, bet...@earthlink.net says...
>> >> > > > > > > > On Dec 16, 12:02Â am, BDK <TopSh...@sanity.com> wrote:
>> >> > > > > > > > > In article <60d60b39-26d8-43f6-afe1-c119641e4df2
>> >> > > > > > > > > @h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, beta...@earthlink.net
>> >> > > > > > > > > says...
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > > Hey stupid. Don't you know about his bombing of eastern
>> >> > > > > > > > > > europe.? Â
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > Bombing of Eastern Europe? Yugoslavia?
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > > He also bombed iraq nearly every day for 8 years and
>> >> > > > > > > > > > also
>> >> > > > > > > > > > hit
>> >> > > > > > > > > > the
>> >> > > > > > > > > > country
>> >> > > > > > > > > > with sanctions. Â In 1996 madeliene albright admitted on
>> >> > > > > > > > > > "60
>> >> > > > > > > > > > minutes"
>> >> > > > > > > > > > that america had killed 500,000 iraqi CHILDREN!!
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > > You meant the military killed hundreds of thousands?
>> >> > > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > > HAHAHAHA. Is that all you got.?? Clinton gave the order but
>> >> > > > > > > > didn't
>> >> > > > > > > > actually drop the bombs personally so he's in the clear?
>> >> > > > > > > > HAHAHA
>> >> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > By your "logic", every POTUS is/has been guilty of "murder".
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > Not every one, but certainly Roosevelt, Truman, and Johnson
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > How ridiculous.
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > Not at all.
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > Snicker.
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > LOL, you're as whacked as Speedy is.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > so you're whacked enough to believe that deliberately bombing
>> >> > > > innocent
>> >> > > > women and children isn't murder?
>> >> > > >
>>
>> The idiot with the nym harold burton uses a classic strawman.
>>
>> "A straw man argument is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of
>> an opponent's position.[1] To "attack a straw man" is to create the
>> illusion of having refuted a proposition by substituting a superficially
>> similar proposition (the "straw man"), and refuting it, without ever
>> having actually refuted the original position.[1] [2]"
>>Hey, shit-for-brains, you have been very dishonest -- in particular in
>>changing my post to make it read like you wanted instead of as it was.
>>You are a low-life fucker and a troll -- and not a very good troll.
>>
>>Is rec.sport.golf your counting group?
>>
>>Is rising to the level of a piece of shit your goal in life?
>
>
>
>Must be why you can't actually refute my claim that Roosevelt, Truman,
>and Johnson are as much murderers as Clinton is.
>
You are a fucking idiot.
BDK
> In article <orusi5p7cp2hai25a...@4ax.com>,
> FACE <AFaceIn...@today.net> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 10:22:43 -0500, in alt.politics, Harold Burton
> > <hal.i....@hotmail.com>, wrote
> >
> > >In article <MPG.259646942...@news.buckeye-express.com>,
> > > BDK <TopS...@sanity.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> In article <hal.i.burton-3243...@news.newsguy.com>,
> > >> hal.i....@hotmail.com says...
> > >> > In article <MPG.259596901...@news.buckeye-express.com>,
> > >> > BDK <TopS...@sanity.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > In article <hal.i.burton-D128...@news.newsguy.com>,
> > >> > > hal.i....@hotmail.com says...
> > >> > > > In article <MPG.259361f02...@news.buckeye-express.com>,
> > >> > > > BDK <TopS...@sanity.com> wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > In article <hal.i.burton-38C9...@news.newsguy.com>,
> > >> > > > > hal.i....@hotmail.com says...
> > >> > > > > > In article
> > >> > > > > > <MPG.2592f542d...@news.buckeye-express.com>,
> > >> > > > > > BDK <TopS...@sanity.com> wrote:
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > In article <88b292e0-7d6a-4cd9-b352-1f768e720714@
> > >> > > > > > > 19g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, bet...@earthlink.net says...
> > >> > > > > > > > > In article <60d60b39-26d8-43f6-afe1-c119641e4df2
> > >> > > > > > > > > @h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, beta...@earthlink.net
> > >> > > > > > > > > says...
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > Hey stupid. Don't you know about his bombing of eastern
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > Bombing of Eastern Europe? Yugoslavia?
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > He also bombed iraq nearly every day for 8 years and
> > >> > > > > > > > > > also
> > >> > > > > > > > > > hit
> > >> > > > > > > > > > the
> > >> > > > > > > > > > country
Your claim is nonsensical. As is your "snicker".
Harold Burton
BDK <TopS...@sanity.com> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > On Dec 16, 12:02 am, BDK <TopSh...@sanity.com> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > In article <60d60b39-26d8-43f6-afe1-c119641e4df2
> > > >> > > > > > > > > @h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, beta...@earthlink.net
> > > >> > > > > > > > > says...
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > Hey stupid. Don't you know about his bombing of
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > eastern
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > europe.?
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > Bombing of Eastern Europe? Yugoslavia?
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > He also bombed iraq nearly every day for 8 years and
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > also
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > hit
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > country
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > with sanctions. In 1996 madeliene albright
Which would make it easy to refute, something you seen to find quite
difficult to do.
Snicker.
Harold Burton
FACE <AFaceIn...@today.net> wrote:
> You are a fucking idiot.
An example of what passes for reasoned argument by leftards.
Snicker.