Re: The Israel You Don't See on the News
mose
"B J Foster" <bjfo...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:hhdo71$9hs$1...@bjf.motzarella.org...
> Ardalan Keykavoussi wrote:
>> The Israel You Don't See on the News
>>
>
> "Update: In February 2009, the United Nations said that a *clerical*
> *error* had led it to report that Israeli mortars had struck a UN-run
> school in Jabaliya, Gaza, on 6 January killing about 40 people. Maxwell
> Gaylord, the UN humanitarian co-ordinator in Jerusalem, said that the
> Israeli Defense Force mortars fell in the street near the compound, and
> not on the compound itself. He said that the UN 'would like to clarify
> that the shelling and all of the fatalities took place outside and not
> inside the school'".
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7814054.stm
>
> "Clerical error" being a euphemism for being somewhat casual with the
> truth.
HMMM ISRAELI JEWS AND JEWS ARE QUITE CASUAL WITH THE TRUTH TO BJ?
Out of all the devastation I have seen so far, there is one story in
particular that I think the world needs to hear. I met a mother who was
at home with her ten children when Israeli soldiers entered the house.
The soldiers told her she had to choose five of her children to "give as
a gift to Israel." As she screamed in horror they repeated the demand
and told her she could choose or they would choose for her. Then these
soldiers murdered five of her children in front of her. The concept of
"Jewish morality" is truly dead. We can be fascists, terrorists, and
Nazis just like everybody else.
DID NOT SEE THIS IN THE MEDIA? NOR DID YOU MENTION IT AS COMMON PRACTICE IN
ISRAEL BY TALMUD FOLLOWERS? CHECK THE TALMUD
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-6657600254881054584&hl=en
DONT HAVE TO TAKE TED'S WORD LOOK ONE UP YOURSELF
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/talmudtruth.html
http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/talmud.htm
http://www.iahushua.com/JQ/talmud.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALCSSLPsiWs
>
CLERICAL ERROR USUALLY THE ISRAELIS CLAIMING THAT TO THE WILD HUZZAS OF JEWS
ELSEWHERE.
AND OF COURSE THE BLAND CLAIM THAT THEY WERE BEING FIRED ON BY HAMAS. NOT
THAT THE JEWS WOULD LIE TO ALL US NON JEWS, JUST CHECK THE Talmud
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-6657600254881054584&hl=en
DONT JUST HAVE TO TAKE TED'S WORD
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/talmudtruth.html
http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/talmud.htm
http://www.iahushua.com/JQ/talmud.html
AND SO WE WILL TO FORGET THE CHILDREN KILLED OUTSIDE THE SCHOOL , JUST
COINCIDENCE.
ERRR-- YOU NEVER EVER MENTIONED THE FOLLOWING EITHER BJ.
http://www.time.com/time/europe/hero/caoimhebutterly.html
That's where a bullet fired by an Israeli soldier found her, hitting her
thigh as she tried to lead a group of Palestinian children to safety.
WHY DO YOU THINK SHE WAS HIT IN THE THIGH BJ ?LEADING A BUNCH OF KIDS??
http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article1360.shtml
. There were children playing on the roadblock, as they often do, and many
scattered due to the gunfire.
There was one boy, however, that Tab noticed was too frightened to move.
Instinctually, he quickly removed him from the area, as he observed shots
land around the small and fragile innocent
After successfully evacuating
him, he was about to leave when he noticed two small girls down in front of
the roadblock, right in the line of fire.
He was going to help them escape when the Israeli soldier in the tower took
his aim, and fired a large calibre sniper bullet directly into Tab's head.
OH DEAR ANOTHER CLERICAL ERROR. THERE ARE SO MANY OF THEM???
>
> "Israeli government spokesman Mark Regev A TALMUD FOLLOWER?? said the
> incident was a 'very extreme example of how Hamas operates.
AND WE KNOW HOW THE TALMUD OPERATES.
When police in Italy were frustrated by lack of action by the authorities
they released some of the video footage to an Italian network which then
showed some of the graphic images hoping to cause
public outrage. Instead of outrage against the Jewish murderers the TV
producers suffered outrage for showing the disturbing images.
YES ALL THE JEWS WORIED ABOUT THEIR REPUTATION BEING WHAT IT SHOULD BE.
DISGUSTING.
Image: blond girl being thrown naked out of a battered van.
http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/4649/antiporn.jpg
In spite of the horror and obvious newsworthiness of this international
Jewish child porn/murder operation, it received littlecoverage in the media
in the United States.
AS I SAID YOU WOULD NOT EVEN HEAR ABOUT IT WITH ALL THE JEWS RINGING UP TO
COMPLAIN ABOUT THE HORRID IMAGES.
When Seth Bekenstein, the ring's American distributor was arrested, there
was little publicity, and in spite of being a part of one of the most
horrific criminal activities imaginable, HE WAS SENTENCED TO ONLY 18 MONTHS
ON GUILTY PLEA.
WONDER IF IT HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH HIS BEING JEWISH?
If you take over - I presume with
> guns - a UN facility. If you hold the people there as hostages, you shoot
> out of that facility at Israeli soldiers in the neighbourhood, then you
> receive incoming fire - I think that's a war crime under international
> law', he told the BBC".
>
NOT THAT JEWS TELL LIES, YOU SEE IT IS NOT A LIE WHEH YOU OBEY THE TALMUD.
http://www.ety.com/HRP/jewishstudies/snuffporn.htm
Jewish officials in a major Italian news agency tried to cover the story
up, but were circumvented by Italian news reporters, who broadcast scenes
from the films live at prime time on Italian television to more than 11
million Italian viewers. Jewish officials then fired the executives
responsible, claiming they were spreading "blood libel."
http://de.nntp2http.com/soc/politik/misc/2009/11/09c1c365eac26344087d3756ed1967e8.html
http://myreader.co.uk/msg/1212715341.aspx
http://goyimgazette-twisted.blogspot.com/2009/03/italian-russian-police-break-up-child.html
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.islam/browse_thread/thread/c9bd6c549f78113b
http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Alt/alt.religion.islam/2005-11/msg01495.html
http://judicial-inc.biz/marc_dutroux_supplement.htm
http://www3.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=46287
CHECK THE TALMUD
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-6657600254881054584&hl=en
DONT HAVE TO TAKE TED'S WORD
LOOK ONE UP YOURSELF
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/talmudtruth.html
http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/talmud.htm
http://www.iahushua.com/JQ/talmud.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALCSSLPsiWs
>
> "French President Nicolas Sarkozy HE'S THE GUY WHO LETS JEWISH THUGS LOOSE
> TO BASH, THROW ACID AT, AND BURN HOMES OF TEACHERS AND ACADEMICS WHO DO
> NOT TOE THE JEWISH LINE. ALSO MISSES HIS LITTLE RAPIST FRIEND POLANSKI,
> POSSIBLY MISSES HIS LITTLE TALKS ON HOW TO TIE DOWN TEENIES TO RAPE???
> said he had asked his Syrian counterpart, Bashar Assad, to help convince
> Hamas to co-operate with efforts to end the Israeli offensive. Syria is
> regarded as a main backer of Hamas".
>
> Hey Nick, while you're discussing your favourite terrorist organisation,
> why not ask Mr Assad what his role was in asassinating the Lebanese PM?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/nov/05/israelandthepalestinians
A four-month ceasefire between Israel and Palestinian militants in Gaza was
in jeopardy today after Israeli troops killed six Hamas gunmen in a raid
into the territory.
THEY DONT WANT PEACE THEY HAVE AN EASY WAR KILLING WOMEN AND BABIES.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1055574.html
AND THEY GIVE THEMSELVES MEDALS FOR THIS??
The IDF has no mercy for the children in Gaza nursery schools
By Gideon Levy, Haaretz Correspondent
The fighting in Gaza is "war deluxe." Compared with previous wars, it is
child's play - pilots bombing unimpeded as if on practice runs, tank and
artillery soldiers shelling houses and civilians from their armored
vehicles, combat engineering troops destroying entire streets in their
ominous protected vehicles without facing serious opposition.
Rassinier seems to wrap it up. NOT A DENIER A MAN IN THE CAMPS AS A
PRISONER FOR HELPING JEWS, BUT ABSOLUTELY ANNOYED BY THE LIES THE JEWS WERE
TELLING.
A French resistance fighter and friend of the Jews, he was imprisoned by the
Germans for his illegal activities in Buchenwald and Camp Dora where he
worked in the underground rocket factories.
Barred from entering Germany for trying to give testimony for the defense in
HOLOCAUST trials .
http://www.ihr.org/books/rassinier/debunking1-0.html
http://www.ihr.org/books/hoggan/A4.html
"Die Auschwitz-L�ge", (The Auschwitz Lie)
As a German agrarian expert, Christophersen was stationed at Auschwitz in
the critical period 1943-44. As a German expert, he had access to the entire
camp. He took valuable photographs at the time. He was the first Revisionist
eyewitness to come forward stating categorically that there were no gas
chambers for killing humans in Auschwitz. He wrote the famous booklet, "Die
Auschwitz-L�ge", (The Auschwitz Lie) translated into many languages. Z�ndel
witness in the 1985 and 1988 Great Holocaust Trials.
"The Hoax of the 20th Century"
An American electrical engineer and university professor, Butz wrote the
"Bible" of modern Revisionism titled "The Hoax of the 20th Century". This
book, which deals with most details of Holocaust lore from "shrunken heads"
to "Jewish soap" and "gassing" claims, more than any other influenced Ernst
Zundel in his Revisionist research.
"The Confessions of Kurt Gerstein."
Henri Rocques is a French author and researcher who exposed the Myth of Pope
Pius XII's complicity in the Holocaust. His doctoral thesis made world-wide
headlines in 1986 when, for the first time in the nearly eight-century
history of French universities, a duly awarded doctorate was quickly revoked
on French government's orders, after an outry by the Leftist-Jewish media in
France. In a tightly argued dissertation, Rocques came to the stunning
conclusion that the allegations of mass gassings of Jews made by SS officer
Kurt Gerstein were groundless, and that the supposed Roman-Catholic coverup
of this "slaughter" are false. He further concluded that postwar academics
deliberately falsified key parts of the already tortured Gerstein testimony.
His dissertation was eventually published by the Institute for Historical
Review in book form under the title "The Confessions of Kurt Gerstein."
http://www.fpp.co.uk/bookchapters/articles/HowWarsBegin.html
http://www.anti-rev.org/textes/VidalNaquet92a/part-6.html
http://www.alibris.com/search/books/author/Paul_Rassinier
(http://www.amazon.com/Perpetual-Peace-Harry-Elmer-Barnes/dp/0939484013
http://www.courts.fsnet.co.uk/harryelmerbarnes.htm
Great Holocaust Trial of 1988
http://www.whale.to/b/trial_1988.html
Fred Leuchter (The only real expert on construction of gas chambers.)
An American execution expert, Leuchter designed and maintained gas chambers
for several US penal institutions. He was sent by Ernst Z�ndel to
investigate Auschwitz, Majdanek, Dachau, Hartheim and other alleged "Nazi
Death Camps" and "gassing facilities." Author of the devastating series of
Leuchter Reports. (I, II, III, IV) and many articles and videotaped
presentations that resulted from these investigations, Leuchter was
blacklisted in the US and hounded by the Holocaust Promotion Lobby and the
world's lapdog media. He was arrested and jailed in Germany for giving an
anti-Holocaust lecture for G�nther Deckert, a well-known political party
leader. Allowed out on bail, Leuchter returned to the US. and chose not to
go back to Germany to stand trial. Nonetheless, he lost his livelihood as a
result. Sensational Z�ndel witness in the Great Holocaust Trial in 1988.
Leuchter, although present in the courtroom in Munich, was not allowed to
testify about his research findings in Auschwitz for Ernst Z�ndel in the
German (Munich) Trial in 1991.
Dr. Faurisson first discovered the technical and architectural drawings of
the Auschwitz morgues, the crematories and other installations. He was also
the first to insist that only a U.S. gas chamber expert could unravel the
technical impossibility of the Auschwitz homicidal gassing story - as
falsely told to the public for over half a century.
He ultimately won his case in the European Court of Human Rights. Austria
must pay him compensation but hasn't done yet
This War is for Us
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/2125
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Culture_of_Critique_series
http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/books.htm
http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/PrefacePPB.pdf
>
>
>> For TvNewsLIES.org to take the time to expose media deception when it
>> comes the the American corporate media's coverage of Israel and all
>> things related would be silly at this point in history. It would be like
>> using a flashlight to point out the sun. The media bias is so obvious
>> that it would be laughable if it were not so unjust.
>>
>> What Americans do not realize however, is the extent of media deception
>> and information control that is official Israeli policy. Yes, by policy
>> and with the total agreement and cooperation of all the Israeli TV news
>> media,
>> Israeli military censors have the final say on every single Israeli
>> military operation that is covered by their media. Every single news item
>> that is viewed by Israeli citizens on their own media in their own so
>> called democracy is government censored.
>>
>> We hear accusations of bias in media outlets like Al Jazeera in the Arab
>> world and on outlets like FOX News here in America, but we never hear
>> about the cooperative deception campaign between the Israeli media and
>> their
>> government.
>>
>> The world can not blame the Israeli citizens for their harsh opinions of
>> Palestinians or any other Arabs because they are fed a controlled one
>> sided and deceptive stream of propaganda masquerading as news.
>>
>> The most important freedom one can have in a democracy is a truly free
>> press for without a free press the citizens can never really be sure
>> about the legitimacy of their democracy. America does not have a national
>> journalism industry. I challenge anyone who claims different to a public
>> discussion about this. And Israel clearly does not have a free press and
>> they are quite
>> open about this.
>>
>> So I ask all of the blind supporters of Israel this question: If Israeli
>> news media clearly and openly take part in complete government
>> censorship, how can you possibly trust them and how can you logically
>> dismiss news and
>> information that contradicts their claims?
>>
>> Think about it.
>> Jesse Richard - Editor, TvNewsLIES.org
>>
>> http://www.tvnewslies.org/html/the_israel_you_don_t_see_on_th.html
>>
>> Video Israel Doesn't Want You to See
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tW1-_JmXQt0&feature=player_embedded
mose
" Dr. Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF " <""samiam\"@hihat.com is a lying, dhimmi
troll ."> wrote in message news:034ab126$0$1343$c3e...@news.astraweb.com...
> http://www.omencity.com/nuke-palestine.jpg
>
ANOTHER PAID JEWISH PROPAGANDIST, THANK CHRIST WE GOT RID OF HIS HERO.
WANTS US TO FOGHT ANOTHER WAR FOR HIS GREEDY EMPLOYERS SO THAT THEY CAN
STEAL MORE LAND AND PROPERTY.
http://www.rebelnews.org/opinion/history/148521-a-tale-of-two-traitors
The formula for the subversion of every country in the world
THE OTHER BEING THAT HAS ANYONE NOTICED THAT THE LOBBY FOR JEWS HAVE TURNED
INTO A SYCOPHANTIC OBSEQUIOUS SERVILE TOADYING SUBSERVIENT GROVELLING
FAWNING SLAVISH GROUP WHICH DOES NOT REPRESENT DEFENCE OF DISCRIMINATION ANY
MORE BUT THE BOUGHT OUT POLITICIANS ARE MUCH MORE SERVILE.
THE ATTITUDE SEEMS TO BE MORE HOW MUCH CAN I SERVE YOU. AM I SERVILE ENOUGH.
DO YOU WISH TO PLACE YOUR FOOT ON MY HEAD TO SHOW HOW WILLING I AM TO DO
YOUR BIDDING AND SERVE YOU BETTER.
THE POSITION THEY NOW APPEAR TO WANT JEWISH LOBBYISTS TO HAVE IS TO PLACE
JEWS AS A NEW ROYALTY ABOVE THE LAW AND NOT TO BE CRITICISED IN ANY WAY
WHETHER THE CRITICISM IS TRUE OR NOT.
Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act is Canada's shameful internet
censorship provision.
Section 13 makes it an offence to "likely" "expose" privileged groups to
"hatred and/or contempt." There are NO defences under Section 13! Even
truth and intent are considered irrelevant to a finding of discrimination.
The law was enacted in 1977 in order to silence a man named John Ross Taylor
for messages he recorded onto his telephone answering machine. In the
intervening 32 years, not a single person who has been hauled up on Section
13 charges has ever been acquitted - a 100% conviction rate.
Mainstream media outlets, from Victoria to Halifax, have demanded a repeal
of Section 13 and denounced the human rights industry. Editorials commonly
refer to the Tribunal as a "kangaroo court," and highlight how 'human
rights' commissions "threaten our liberty."
On September 2, 2009, the Human Rights Tribunal declared that Section 13 and
54 were unconstitutional.
BLAIR
"FrereTuck" <no...@invalid.com wrote in message
news:pan.2009.12...@invalid.com...
Blair sidestepped the rules by inserting a second partnership as one of
the notional partners, in a way the regulations do not cover
ah... well... trixie bell blairoh eh.... somehow the regs would change
so
he would be hung with flimsiest chinese rucksack shoulder-loop
cotton.... ;)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/dec/17/mystery-tony-blairs-money-solved
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2002/apr/21/uk.medicalscience
between 1955 and 1963 planes flew from north-east England to the tip
of
Cornwall along the south and west coasts, dropping huge amounts of zinc
cadmium sulphide on the population.
ah... just so many lab rats of the types at wildtrouser hall eh...
pull... what-what....
GUYS LIKE GALLOWAY NOT ON AM OBVIOUS LEASH?NOT JUST WORKING FOR JEWISH
ISRAEL. THATS RIGHT JEWISH ISRAEL THEY DONT GIVE A SHIT FOR CHRISTIANS.
http://www.forward.com/articles/3707/
SO DECENCY IS NOT DEAD YET IN BRITAIN
ISRAEL CYBER PROPAGANDISTS
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article693911.ece
> --
ANOTHER BRAVE MAN BACKING THE HURNDALLS
http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/pro-israel-mps-new-official-palestinian-activist
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHiAsac1m8I
President Andrew Jackson,
President Andrew Jackson, the only one of our presidents whose
administration totally abolished the National Debt, condemned the
international bankers as a "den of vipers" which he was determined to "rout
out" of the fabric of American life. Jackson claimed that if only the
American people understood how these vipers operated on the American scene
"there would a revolution before morning." http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=99
In 1828, immediately upon his election as the new President of the US,
President Andrew Jackson began an investigation of the Second Bank of the
United States. President Jackson argued that the bank was privately owned
with stockholders from foreign nations who had political agendas at odds
with the United States. President Jackson, an avowed Christian, is known for
these famous words against the Rothschilds:
- "You are a den of thieves vipers, and I intend to rout you out, and by the
Eternal God, I will rout you out." -
http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=99
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hZAKsQbhLI&NR=1
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/slavery.htm
by George Bennett
In his first Annual Message to Congress, Jackson recommended eliminating the
Electoral
U.S. Rep. Dennis Kucinich lasted less than 24 hours as headliner for the
Palm Beach County Democratic Party's annual fundraising dinner after some of
the party's elected officials blasted the Ohio Democrat's stance on Israel
and threatened to skip the event.
EUROPE
following the final Jewish defeat.
500-1300+ AD
According to Encyclopedia Britannica, Jewish merchants come to dominate
trade in the Middle Ages (with the exception of Scandinavia to which they
were never granted access). This also includes control of the eastern trade
routes to Asia. Their power will remain virtually intact until they are
thrown out of West European countries in the century preceding the
Renaissance. The first country to do so is Great Britain in 1290; France
follows its example in 1306, and country after country soon do the same.
Spain and Portugal are the last to ban the Jews, as late as in 1492 and
1498; by then they had access only to a few German city states, part of
northern Italy, and the papal possessions surrounding Avignon. Their
influence is also heavily restricted by the Fourth Laterenian Council of the
Catholic Church..
When the Jews lose their power, the economy once again rests in European
hands. Trade, which had been treated as a shady oligopoly, is now subject to
fair competition, and fantastic economic progress is made. White patrons use
some of their wealth to finance artists and scholars, and the Renaissance
sweeps over Europe like a fresh, new spring. The new culture and learning is
based almost entirely on ancient Greek and Roman scriptures, the cradle of
European civilization, and the Renaissance will remain forever a great
example of what a free White people can accomplish.
In Eastern Europe, however, trade largely remains in Jewish hands, and no
commercial progress is made.
CHECK THE TALMUD
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-6657600254881054584&hl=en
DONT HAVE TO TAKE TED'S WORD
LOOK ONE UP YOURSELF
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/talmudtruth.html
http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/talmud.htm
http://www.iahushua.com/JQ/talmud.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALCSSLPsiWs
CHECK THE WHOLE HOLOHOAXING BUNCH.
http://images.google.co.id/images?hl=id&um=1&sa=1&q=%2251+documents
%22&btnG=Telusuri+gambar&aq=f&oq=&start=0
The Alternative Tour of Auschwitz: An Independent Investigation of the
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4138523842550891901#0h53m09s
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8424408632716421689
http://www.zundelsite.org/english/debate/009_jam.html
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ipvdBnU8F8
> - KRudd at his finest.
>
> "The Labour Party is corrupt beyond redemption!"
> - Labour hasbeen Mark Latham in a moment of honest clarity.
>
> "This is the recession we had to have!"
> - Paul Keating explaining why he gave Australia another Labour recession.
>
> "Silly old bugger!"
> - Well known ACTU pisspot and sometime Labour prime minister Bob Hawke
> responding to a pensioner who dared ask for more.
>
> "By 1990, no child will live in poverty"
> - Bob Hawke again, desperate to win another election.
>
> "A billion trees ..."
> - Borke, pissed as a newt again.
>
> "Well may we say 'God save the Queen' because nothing will save the
> governor general!"
> - Egotistical shithead and pompous fuckwit E.G. Whitlam whining about his
> appointee for Governor General John Kerr.
>
> "SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU DUMB CUNT!"
> - FlangesBum on learning the truth about Labour's economic capabilities.
>
> "I don't care what you fuckers think!"
> - KRudd the KRude Rat at his finest again.
>
> "We'll just change it all when we get in."
> - Garrett the carrott
mose
"Newsbot" <ne...@news.new> wrote in message
news:MPG.25a48f17c...@news.giganews.com...
> In article <bez_m.65646$ze1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
> mo...@capp.com
> says... CHECK THE TALMUD
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-6657600254881054584&hl=en
>>
> check this
ANOTHER YELLOW BELLY PROPAGANDIST JEW WHO WANTS US TO FIGHT A WAR FOR HIM
AFTER BRINGING US INTO THE GREEDY CONFLICT IN ISRAEL THAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
9/11 AND ALL THE BOMB DEATHS SINCE
GUYS LIKE GALLOWAY NOT ON AM OBVIOUS LEASH?NOT JUST WORKING FOR JEWISH
ISRAEL. THATS RIGHT JEWISH ISRAEL THEY DONT GIVE A SHIT FOR CHRISTIANS.
http://www.forward.com/articles/3707/
SO DECENCY IS NOT DEAD YET IN BRITAIN
ISRAEL CYBER PROPAGANDISTS
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article693911.ece
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaYqa_J0pPY&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BuTQ6ystWrw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7EB1FxENxQ
It is depraved to deny the main motive for the 9/11 attacks. Weasels:
Lawrence Wright, Terry McDermott, Brian Michael Jenkins, Jeffrey Goldberg,
Leo Braudy As far as
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZM3hSeXZPM
http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=OLj5ivn6SRo&feature=related
It is depraved to deny the main motive for the 9/11 attacks. Weasels:
Lawrence Wright, Terry McDermott, Brian Michael Jenkins, Jeffrey Goldberg,
Leo Braudy As far as
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7805075.stm
http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=tW1-_JmXQt0&feature=related
http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=ynWjYHP91gA&feature=related
ISRAELI NAZIES AT WORK.
THE BRAVE IDF KILLING A CHRISTIAN THE ONLY WAY THEY DARE.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpBM-G9bRaY&feature=r
http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=ES&hl=es&v=tW1-_JmXQt0&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yl6-ezZTlYc&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sdnyAgR4bo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00NzIAQ7lvk&feature=fvw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GCJsfVBo-8&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pdvo3-A4d4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_CRzdlA5To&feature=channel
http://theconnexion.net/wp/?p=4566
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C8ST5m9pREQ&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=But9m3O4umI&feature=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3GBBIdmgoM&feature=related
DONT HAVE TO TAKE TED'S WORD
LOOK ONE UP YOURSELF
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/talmudtruth.html
http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/talmud.htm
http://www.iahushua.com/JQ/talmud.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALCSSLPsiWs
Bonnabucci and dice
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnliRXAIyIo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvzlFBgbHVE&feature=related
http://www.erichufschmid.net/video/Ruth-Madoff-blames-Gentiles.wmv
From Ruth Madoff: The Gentiles are responsible for the Madoff's problems.
Brendon O'Connell Arrested And Charged Yet Again
Written by Jim Kerr ~ Webmaster ~ FugaziQuo.Com
At 17:00 hours on Monday, 16th November 2009, Brendon O'Connell was arrested
at his place of residence by western Australia police. Charges of 'conduct
intended to incite racial vilification' and 'obstructing the police' have
been made against Brendon. The police have confiscated Brendon's laptop and
desktop machines along with his mobile phone, his video camera, and his
passport. The police also seized documentation regarding his scheduled court
hearing this coming Friday.
CHECK THE WHOLE HOLOHOAXING BUNCH.
http://images.google.co.id/images?hl=id&um=1&sa=1&q=%2251+documents
%22&btnG=Telusuri+gambar&aq=f&oq=&start=0
The Alternative Tour of Auschwitz: An Independent Investigation of the
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4138523842550891901#0h53m09s
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8424408632716421689
http://www.zundelsite.org/english/debate/009_jam.html
http://www.economyincrisis.org/
http://www.economyincrisis.org/#
the truth about auswitch
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dyBMuSYLGk
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8424408632716421689
http://www.geocities.com/truth4ever123/21.htm
Israel claims that what she does to the Palestinian authority is a self
defense war against terrorism .
The truth:
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1055574.html
AND THEY GIVE THEMSELVES MEDALS FOR THIS??
The IDF has no mercy for the children in Gaza nursery schools
By Gideon Levy, Haaretz Correspondent
The fighting in Gaza is "war deluxe." Compared with previous wars, it is
child's play - pilots bombing unimpeded as if on practice runs, tank and
artillery soldiers shelling houses and civilians from their armored
vehicles, combat engineering troops destroying entire streets in their
ominous protected vehicles without facing serious opposition.
1) in 18 April 2002 the Jewish '' Gerald Kovman '' lead a massive attack on
the Israeli prime minister confirming that he and his army committed war
crimes in Palestinian lands saying the deeds of Sharon bleach the with blood
and described the Israeli army actions as barbarian . also ''Ann Claude ''
work party - just arriving from Jenin - asked the world leaders to impose
punishment on Israel and prohibit selling weapons to it .Also she told the
members examples of the sad stories she heard in the camp
2) in Feb. 2002 the Israeli journalist David Forman said that '' the
demolition and destruction of Palestinians houses keeps tens of people
homeless in freezing nights , is a process that lack mercy and unrelated to
security or capturing the people who kill Israeli soldiers .
3) the ex work minister '' Norbert bloom '' in a statement for him in June
2002 to Sturn magazine the operations of the Israeli army in Palestine land
does not appear as anti-terrorism activities but operations its purpose the
elimination of people also said that Anti-Semitism is the baton used in
Germany to kill any sounds that clear the picture of human rights violation
Israel commits.
"jgarbuz" <jga...@netzero.com wrote in message
news:2c1d2ceb-0da6-436a...@a17g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 18, 4:43 pm, Peace Power <anamin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 18, 1:39 pm, "Kurt Knoll" <kno...@citywest.ca wrote:
You will never see anything like this in a western news paper and
certainly
not without the holocaust permission.
Kurt Knoll.
Ain't that the truth!
"Peace Power" <anamin...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:c6e7c543-2139-4563...@v5g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
The San Diego Tribune
Remembering the Palestinian Nakba
Nearly 30 years since she had seen her Northern Galilee home in what
she called "48 Palestine," Rasmiya Barghouti was finally given a
permit by the Israeli military authorities to visit. She decided to
take two of her daughters and four of her grandchildren with her.
It took less than three hours to reach Safad, renamed Tsvat by Israel
after 1948. The van stopped in front of the white stone home that held
her childhood memories. She proceeded to the familiar metal door,
where she knocked. A large eastern European woman opened the door; the
two argued. Rasmiya returned to the van, her hardened face wet with
tears. Her only words were: "She wouldn't let me in! She still has the
same curtains I made with my mother."
They proceeded in silence, as she wept discretely, to lunch at a hotel
on Lake Tiberias where her youngest grandchild grew hyper. Instead of
imposing her usual military-style discipline on the child, she
encouraged him to splatter water and make even "more noise" - a shock
to the rest of the family.
The Israeli waiter hurriedly came to the table demanding, in Hebrew,
they stop the raucous behavior. It was then that her defiance exploded
into cursing the waiter in Arabic. "We can do whatever we please! This
is my father's hotel!" she yelled. Until that moment, her children and
grandchildren had been sheltered from knowing anything about her dear
loss.
The rage of this Palestinian woman was born out of seeing her
childhood home, from which she was forced to leave in 1948, now
occupied by a stranger who would not even allow her in. She'd seen her
father's hotel, which he was never allowed to vacate, taken over by
strangers. For the first time since her violent dispossession in 1948,
she was allowed to visit her homeland, but not to return. Because
millions of other Palestinian refugees are denied even such a visit,
Rasmiya was considered "lucky."
While Israel celebrates 60 years since its establishment,
Palestinians everywhere commemorate the "Nakba"("Catastrophe" in
Arabic) that befell them after armed Jewish militia raided their homes
and expelled them.
The exclusionary Zionist vision of creating a Jewish state in
Palestine meant the elimination of the indigenous, "non-Jewish"
population. In his book, "The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine,"
Israelihistorian Ilan Pappe writes: " . . . on 10 March 1948 . . .
veteran
Zionist leaders together with young military Jewish officers, put the
final touches to a plan for the ethnic cleansing of Palestine."
Thus the Palestinians had become the victims of the victims of
Europe.
Ilan Pappe explains how Jewish militias, the future armed forces of
the state of Israel, carried out a plan of large-scale intimidation
and siege, setting fires to Palestinian homes, planting mines,
destroying more than 500 villages, and exercising other terrorist
activities. In the end, nearly 800,000 Palestinians were forced out of
their homes and into refugee camps in Gaza, the West Bank, Jordan,
Lebanon, Syria, Egypt and elsewhere.
Rasmiya's family was among this wave of refugees. This massive ethnic
cleansing completed the first phase of the compulsory "transfer" that
the founder of Israel, David Ben-Gurion, advocated in his address to
the Jewish Agency Executive as early as 1938. Thus the Palestinians
had become the victims of the victims of Europe.
Ten years ago, the late Edward Said commented on the "Israel at 50"
celebrations: "I still find myself astonished at the lengths to which
official Israel and its supporters will go to suppress the fact that a
half century has gone by without Israeli restitution, recognition or
acknowledgment of Palestinian human rights . . . the Palestinian Nakba
is characterized as a semi-fictional event . . . caused by no one in
particular."
The same stubborn refusal to recognize the Palestinian Nakba
characterizes the "Israel at 60" celebrations in the U.S. media today.
For Palestinians, denial of the Nakba is tantamount to denying the
Holocaust for Jews.
Remembering the Nakba is even more compelling given what former
President Jimmy Carter describes as an apartheid-like system that
Israel has built to entangle the Palestinians in a seemingly endless
cycle of hopelessness and violence. Israel still denies millions of
Palestinian refugees their U.N.-sanctioned right to go back to their
homes simply because they are not Jewish. Israel continues its 41-year-
old military occupation of the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Golan
Heights. Israel continues to impose its savage blockade on the Gaza
strip. Israel continues to build its illegal wall and settlements on
occupied Palestinian land. And Israel continues to treat its own "non-
Jewish" population as second-class citizens.
Can any conscientious person, then, celebrate Israel at 60?
When Israel has made reparations for its shameful past; when it has
conformed to international law and universal human rights; when it has
ended its brutal oppression of the indigenous people of Palestine; and
when it has allowed Palestinians to practice their right to self-
determination on their own land, we can all celebrate. Then, even
Rasmiya's descendants may celebrate.
http://attendingtheworld.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/victims-of-the-vict...
I tried to register at the above website, but I could find no place
where to do so, and I couldn't log in if I hadn't registered. Can
someone tell me where to register for this raghead website?
Here, oh stupid one.
I look forward to seeing your diatribes.
http://video.google.ca/videosearch?q=TALMUD+2009&hl=en&emb=0#
http://video.google.ca/videosearch?q=TALMUD+2009&hl=en&emb=0#q=TALMUD+2009&hl=en&emb=0&start=10
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-6657600254881054584&hl=en#
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-6657600254881054584&hl=en#docid=-7596696979613707948
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-6657600254881054584&hl=en#docid=9158927595901453001
http://video.google.ca/videosearch?q=TALMUD+2009&hl=en&emb=0#
HAVE WE JOINED THE GUTLESS POLS AND ACADEMICS IN OUR COUNTRY?
AND THESE GUTLESS ACADEMICS IN NOT QUESTIONING ARE SUPPORTING THE LIES AND
PROPAGANDA SPREAD BY ZIONISTS / ISRAEL AND
SUPPORTERS WHO BY THE WAY ARE NOT EITHER LOYAL CITIZENS TO OUR WESTERN
DEMOCRACIES OR HONEST MEN/WOMEN TO SUPPORT SUCH LIES.
ACADEMICS BY THEIR SILENCE ALLOWING THESE FRAUDS TO ENJOY A GOOD LIVING ON
THESE LIES AND BY THEIR INACTION PERSECUTING HONEST ACADEMICS SIMPLY FOR
EXPOSING THE TRUTH.
Casualties in WW2
Not including the documented 5 million non Jewish in concentration camps
who far out numbered the suspected true number (700,000 ODD) of Jewish
victims. And this is without lies and exaggerations about non jewish
cassualities. And freedom for any historian or amateur history buff to
examine and point out flaws without fear of castigation or jail terms.
And no one is going around asking for special favors and sympathy because of
these immense casualities. And certainly don't look like getting anything
from jewish interests who by lies have swollen their numbers to higher than
these. AND BEGGED ALL SORTS OF FAVORS AND REPARATIONS WITH THOSE EXAGERATED
FIGURES. WHILE USING THEIR STORIES TO CAUSE AN IMMENSE SPLIT BETWEEN NON
JEWS IN EUROPE AND AMERICA.
WHILE OF COURSE QUITE FREE THEMSELVES TO ASSOCIATE WITH THEIR FELLOW JEWS IN
Germany, EUROPE AND ARAB COUNTRIES.
Soviet Union 25,568,000
China 11,324,000
Germany 7,060,000
Poland 6,850,000
Japan 1,806,000
Yugoslavia 1,700,000
Rumania 985,000
France 810,000
Austria 525,000
Italy 410,000
Great Britain 388,000
USA 295,000
Holland 250,000
Belgium 85,000
Finland 79,000
Canada 42,000
India 36,000
Australia 29,000
Albania 28,000
Spain 22,000
Bulgaria 21,000
New Zealand 12,000
Norway 10,000
South Africa 9,000
Luxembourg 5,000
Denmark 4,000
Fees for evac.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/07/18/lebanon.evacuation/
Right-Wing Attacks American Evacuees: 'Ingrates,' 'Whining,' 'Spoiled-Rotten
Little Children' Not that the right wing is heavily populated by
jews/zionists
Israel's original sin
http://www.deccanherald.com/deccanherald/Aug102005/editpage162334200589.asp
http://www.britains-smallwars.com/Palestine/kidnap.htm
"At a daily rate of $8.10, hospitalized troops, including those wounded in
Iraq and Afghanistan, are being charged for their meals
http://www.antiwar.com/barganier/ba091503.html
UN urges Israel halt 'violations'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5154594.stm
GENEVA - A UN human rights expert on Wednesday criticized the United States,
European Union, Russia and the United Nations for ignoring countless Israeli
violations of human rights, international law and other standards.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/735109.html
Apparently they should be as happy as they are that their fellow israelis
are bombing them. The chickenhawks now showing their brave side.
http://pseudojournalist.blogspot.com/2006/07/americans-trapped-in-lebanon.html
The Bush administration's evacuation of Americans in Lebanon has been
disorganized and lagged behind the efforts of other countries. As of
yesterday, only a few thousand had been able to evacuate, and they departed
"two days after the first Europeans left on ships." Denmark, for example,
"evacuated more than 4,000 of its citizens" by Thursday.
Conservatives have reacted to this incompetence by attacking the evacuees:
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/07/21/right-wing-evacuees/
http://gmroper.mu.nu/archives/187407.php
http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/news_theswamp/2006/07/americans_trapp.html
http://pseudojournalist.blogspot.com/2006/07/americans-trapped-in-lebanon.html
KILLINGS AT A BEACH PICNIC.
Lebanon
http://lebanonheartblogs.blogspot.com/2006/07/warning-strong-pictures.html
"At a daily rate of $8.10, hospitalized troops, including those wounded in
Iraq and Afghanistan, are being charged for their meals
http://www.antiwar.com/barganier/ba091503.html
UN urges Israel halt 'violations'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5154594.stm
GENEVA - A UN human rights expert on Wednesday criticized the United States,
European Union, Russia and the United Nations for ignoring countless Israeli
violations of human rights, international law and other standards.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/735109.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14029827/
BEIRUT, Lebanon - An Israeli bomb destroyed a U.N. observer post on the
border in southern Lebanon Tuesday, killing three observers and leaving
another feared dead,
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1947UN181.html
Resolution 181
http://www.mideastweb.org/181.htm
xxxxx
VIOLATIONS OF AGREEMENTS IN GAZA BOTTOM.
"Surfer" <n...@spam.net wrote in message
news:prnrp41aal6pn41va...@4ax.com...
Article 51: Israel's false claim
Reza Nasri
17 - 02 - 2009
Both opponents and supporters of Israel's attacks on Gaza fail to see
how deep its breach of international law and norms really runs
http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/email/article-51-israels-false-claim
Israel claims that its recent attacks on Gaza are justified under
international law. In doing so, it invokes Article 51 of the UN
charter
http://www.un.org/aboutun/charter/chapter7.shtml
which clearly recognizes the right to self-defence as an "inherent"
right of States. In a statement made before the Security Council
http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Foreign+Relations/Israel+and+the+UN/Speeches+-+statements/Statement_Amb_Shalev_UN_Security_Council_31-Dec-2008
at the outset of the latest hostilities, Israel's Ambassador to the
United Nations, Gabriela Shalev, clearly invoked Article 51 by
claiming that:
"In its military operation, Israel exercised its inherent right to
self-defence, enshrined in Article 51 of the United Nations Charter.
Any other State would have acted in the same manner faced with similar
terrorist threats."
Later on, the Permanent mission of Israel reiterates this position in
a letter addressed to the Secretary General.
http://domino.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/59c118f065c4465b852572a500625fea/626086b0d0adccbb852575380059d4e7%21OpenDocument
Once again, Israel officially claims that:
"In response to Hamas' continuous terrorist attacks, Israel has been
acting in accordance with its inherent right to self-defence enshrined
in Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations."
To counter Israel's assertion, opponents argue that the right to
self-defence - while being an inherent right of States - is subject to
the customary rules of proportionality and necessity. They note that
Israel's massive military operations in Gaza do not meet these two
conditions (the military operations are excessively violent compared
to the alleged attacks that provoked them) and conclude that they are
therefore illegal under international law.
In my opinion, both sides miss a crucial point.
Non-applicability of Article 51 in occupied territories
The right to self-defence - as recognized by Article 51 of the Charter
- is a right attributable to "States" only in their "international"
relations. A State is allowed to recourse to self-defence if it is
subject to another State's unlawful use of force. The situation must
involve:
a) An armed attack (of sufficient gravity);
http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&k=66&case=70&code=nus&p3=90&PHPSESSID=770100a1728e2520992f556096d06e03
b) Conducted between States (or from one State territory) - as main
subjects of international law;
c) And be of an international character.
Article 51 does not apply to a situation that involves an Occupying
Power (the State of Israel) acting within occupied territories under
its own authority and responsibility. In legal terms, Israel cannot
invoke the right to self-defence under Article 51 to justify the use
of military force in territories on which Israel itself exercises
effective control, at least since 1967. (Although Israel withdrew its
troops from Gaza under the "disengagement plan" in 2005, Israel's
relocation of its troops from the occupied land does not end its
status as the "Occupying power". Israel continuously maintained
control over Gaza's borders, air and sea space, water, electricity,
sewage and telecommunication systems and because of that, Gaza remains
an occupied territory as defined in international law. In fact, UN
Security Council resolution 1860 issued on January 8, 2009 clearly
notes that: "the Gaza Strip constitutes an integral part of the
territory occupied in 1967".)
http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N09/204/32/PDF/N0920432.pdf?OpenElement
Indeed, it would be inconceivable for most of us to imagine any other
country barricading a city or a district within a territory under its
own watch, then use F-16 fire jets, high-tech Cobra helicopters,
ground troops, cluster bombs, white phosphorus and depleted uranium
ammunition, killing thousands of its inhabitants under the pretext of
combating, for instance, street gang criminality. It would be even
more absurd if that country justified all that by invoking an
extraneous right under the UN Charter. Yet, this is exactly what
Israel has done in Gaza.
Palestine (Gaza strip and the West Bank) is not yet considered an
independent sovereign State - especially not by Israel. The swath of
land known as "Palestine" (which encompasses Gaza) is an inhabited
territory under Israeli mandate and occupation since 1967. For Israel
to become entitled to invoke Article 51 of the UN Charter (which is a
multilateral inter-state treaty) and benefit from its relevant rules
of self-defence, Israel needs at least to recognize that it is dealing
with another "State" (be it a State that directly commits armed
attacks against Israel or a State whose territory is being used by an
autonomous hostile group to mount attacks against Israel). But Israel
cannot persistently rebuff Palestine's Statehood on one hand, and, on
the other hand, treat Palestine as a State whenever it needs to
utilise the Charter to legitimise its use of force against.
In other words, Israel's self-defence argument entails the
precondition of recognising Palestinian Statehood; while not doing so
entails setting the Charter's legal subterfuges aside and solely
complying with the strictures of Humanitarian law (especially the
Geneva Conventions) regarding occupation.
The world court's position
http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=4&code=mwp&case=131&k=5a
In its July 2004 advisory opinion on the Legal Consequences of the
Construction of a Wall, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) had
already established the non-applicability of "self-defence" under
Article 51 in the situation between Israel and the Occupied
Territories (a key point that most commentators seem to have
forgotten). Just as it claims today, Israel had argued in the Wall
case that the construction of a wall around the West Bank was an act
of self-defence consistent with Article 51 of the Charter. According
to Israel, Article 51 supported its right to build the wall to protect
itself against terrorist attacks emanating from the occupied
territories.
But the Court dismissed this argument as follows:
http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/131/1687.pdf
"Article 51 of the Charter thus recognizes the existence of an
inherent right of self-defence in the case of armed attack by one
State against another State. However, Israel does not claim that the
attacks against it are imputable to a foreign State. The Court also
notes that Israel exercises control in the Occupied Palestinian
Territory and that, as Israel itself states, the threat which it
regards as justifying the construction of the wall originates within,
and not outside, that territory. [...] Consequently, the Court
concludes that Article 51 of the Charter has no relevance in this
case" (emphasis added by author).
A fortiori, the Court's position is also valid regarding the recent
situation in Gaza.
In fact, there seems to be a growing consensus among prominent
international law experts regarding the issue. In a document entitled
"The Chatham House Principles of International Law on the Use of Force
in Self-Defence", the Royal Institute of International Affairs also
confirmed the non-applicability of Article 51 by stressing that
"unless an attack is directed from outside territory under the control
of the defending State, the question of self-defence in the sense of
Article 51 does not normally arise".
The impermissible confusion: Jus ad bellum vs Jus in bello
The law of the use of force is composed of two distinct branches:
a) the law governing the recourse to force (jus ad bellum) and;
b) the law governing the conduct of hostilities (jus in bello).
The first set of laws refers to the reasons States may invoke to
justify war, while the second set governs the means they may adopt in
executing war or the way they should act in a post-war situation, such
as occupation. The jus ad bellum rules are mostly enshrined in the UN
Charter (i.e. article 2(4) and article 51), while the jus in bello
rules are mostly to be found in the four Geneva Conventions, the Hague
regulations and relevant customary norms. Self-defence logically
belongs to the realm of jus ad bellum while "occupation" is naturally
governed by the jus in bello.
As Georges Abi-Saab - Professor Emeritus at the Graduate Institute of
International Studies in Geneva - explained in his oral pleading
before the ICJ in the wall case:
"[S]elf-defence does not belong to international humanitarian law or
the jus in bello, but to the jus ad bellum [the branch of law that
defines the legitimate reasons a State may engage in war]. Israel
makes here an impermissible confusion between the two branches of the
law of war that have to be kept radically apart".
As it did in the wall case, Israel still attempts to sustain that
confusion, for good reason.
Israel has already exhausted its right to self-defence when it
pre-emptively seized the West Bank and Gaza from neighbouring
belligerent States in an international conflict in 1967. Since then,
the only set of laws that govern the Israeli-Palestinian situation is
the customary and treaty-based norms of "Humanitarian law" that
regulate occupation (Jus in bello). According to the applicable law,
Israel is not only proscribed from harming the inhabitants of these
territories, but it is obliged to ensure their safety and security
(Article 43 of The Hague regulations). Israel is also under the
obligation to provide protection to their private properties (Arts. 46
and 47 of the Fourth Geneva convention), and to keep intact their
"public buildings, real estate, forests and agricultural estates"
(Art. 55 of the Fourth Geneva convention).
Israel's recent massive bombardments and use of heavy artillery
against Gaza cannot be reconciled with these obligations. In fact,
Israel's recent actions constitute, under Article 147 of the Fourth
Convention, as well as Article 85 of Protocol I and Article 8 of the
Rome Statute, grave breaches of international law which entail
individual criminal responsibility.
By constantly alluding to the notion of self-defence as per Article 51
and by framing the military operations in Gaza solely in terms of
necessity and proportionality, even the opponents of Israel
unconsciously affirm the "impermissible confusion" that Israel is
deliberately trying to disseminate.
=====================================
Reza Nasri is an international lawyer based at the Graduate Institute
of International and Development Studies in Geneva.
A list of UN Resolutions against "Israel" Here is a list of UN resolutions
that Israel has not complied with, far more than Iraq. Note that she has
also illegally developed nuclear weapons. Further, the situation is far
worse than would at first appear, it involves the serious distortion of the
official Security Council record by the profligate use by the United States
of its veto power. (See Table) Israel's, defiance goes back to its very
beginnings. This collection of resolutions criticizing Israel is unmatched
by the record of any other nation as Israel stands in violation of more UN
resolutions than ANY OTHER NATION ON EARTH.
A list of UN Resolutions against "Israel" 1955-1992: *
Resolution 106: " . . . 'condemns' Israel for Gaza raid". *
Resolution 111: " . . . 'condemns' Israel for raid on Syria that killed
fifty-six people". * Resolution 127: " . . . 'recommends' Israel suspends
it's 'no-man's zone' in Jerusalem". *
Resolution 162: " . . . 'urges' Israel to comply with UN decisions". *
Resolution 171: " . . . determines flagrant violations' by Israel in its
attack on Syria". Resolution 228: " . . . 'censures' Israel for its attack
on Samu in the West Bank, then under Jordanian control". *
Resolution 237: " . . . 'urges' Israel to allow return of new 1967
Palestinian refugees". Resolution 248: " . . . 'condemns' Israel for its
massive attack on Karameh in Jordan". *
Resolution 250: " . . . 'calls' on Israel to refrain from holding military
parade in Jerusalem". *
Resolution 251: " . . . 'deeply deplores' Israeli military parade in
Jerusalem in defiance of Resolution 250". *
Resolution 252: " . . . 'declares invalid' Israel's acts to unify Jerusalem
as Jewish capital". *
Resolution 256: " . . . 'condemns' Israeli raids on Jordan as 'flagrant
violation". * Resolution 259: " . . . 'deplores' Israel's refusal to accept
UN mission to probe occupation". *
Resolution 262: " . . . 'condemns' Israel for attack on Beirut airport". *
Resolution 265: " . . . 'condemns' Israel for air attacks for Salt in
Jordan". * Resolution 267: " . . . 'censures' Israel for administrative acts
to change the status of Jerusalem". *
Resolution 270: " . . . 'condemns' Israel for air attacks on villages in
southern Lebanon". *
Resolution 271: " . . . 'condemns' Israel's failure to obey UN resolutions
on Jerusalem". *
Resolution 279: " . . . 'demands' withdrawal of Israeli forces from
Lebanon". * Resolution 280: " . . . 'condemns' Israeli's attacks against
Lebanon". *
Resolution 285: " . . . 'demands' immediate Israeli withdrawal form
Lebanon". * Resolution 298: " . . . 'deplores' Israel's changing of the
status of Jerusalem". * Resolution 313: " . . . 'demands' that Israel stop
attacks against Lebanon". * Resolution 316: " . . . 'condemns' Israel for
repeated attacks on Lebanon". * Resolution 317: " . . . 'deplores' Israel's
refusal to release Arabs abducted in Lebanon". *
Resolution 332: " . . . 'condemns' Israel's repeated attacks against
Lebanon". * Resolution 337: " . . . 'condemns' Israel for violating
Lebanon's sovereignty". * Resolution 347: " . . . 'condemns' Israeli attacks
on Lebanon". *
Resolution 425: " . . . 'calls' on Israel to withdraw its forces from
Lebanon". * Resolution 427: " . . . 'calls' on Israel to complete its
withdrawal from Lebanon. * Resolution 444: " . . . 'deplores' Israel's lack
of cooperation with UN peacekeeping forces". *
Resolution 446: " . . . 'determines' that Israeli settlements are a 'serious
obstruction' to peace and calls on Israel to abide by the Fourth Geneva
Convention". *
Resolution 450: " . . . 'calls' on Israel to stop attacking Lebanon". *
Resolution 452: " . . . 'calls' on Israel to cease building settlements in
occupied territories". *
Resolution 465: " . . . 'deplores' Israel's settlements and asks all member
states not to assist Israel's settlements program". *
Resolution 467: " . . . 'strongly deplores' Israel's military intervention
in Lebanon". * Resolution 468: " . . . 'calls' on Israel to rescind illegal
expulsions of two Palestinian mayors and a judge and to facilitate their
return". *
Resolution 469: " . . . 'strongly deplores' Israel's failure to observe the
council's order not to deport Palestinians". *
Resolution 471: " . . . 'expresses deep concern' at Israel's failure to
abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention". *
Resolution 476: " . . . 'reiterates' that Israel's claim to Jerusalem are
'null and void'". * Resolution 478: " . . . 'censures (Israel) in the
strongest terms' for its claim to Jerusalem in its 'Basic Law'". *
Resolution 484: " . . . 'declares it imperative' that Israel re- admit two
deported Palestinian mayors". *
Resolution 487: " . . . 'strongly condemns' Israel for its attack on Iraq's
nuclear facility". *
Resolution 497: " . . . 'decides' that Israel's annexation of Syria's Golan
Heights is 'null and void' and demands that Israel rescinds its decision
forthwith". *
Resolution 498: " . . . 'calls' on Israel to withdraw from Lebanon". *
Resolution 501: " . . . 'calls' on Israel to stop attacks against Lebanon
and withdraw its troops". *
Resolution 509: " . . . 'demands' that Israel withdraw its forces forthwith
and unconditionally from Lebanon". *
Resolution 515: " . . . 'demands' that Israel lift its siege of Beirut and
allow food supplies to be brought in". *
Resolution 517: " . . . 'censures' Israel for failing to obey UN resolutions
and demands that Israel withdraw its forces from Lebanon". *
Resolution 518: " . . . 'demands' that Israel cooperate fully with UN forces
in Lebanon". *
Resolution 520: " . . . 'condemns' Israel's attack into West Beirut". *
Resolution 573: " . . . 'condemns' Israel 'vigorously' for bombing Tunisia
in attack on PLO headquarters. *
Resolution 587: " . . . 'takes note' of previous calls on Israel to withdraw
its forces from Lebanon and urges all parties to withdraw". *
Resolution 592: " . . . 'strongly deplores' the killing of Palestinian
students at Bir Zeit University by Israeli troops". *
Resolution 605: " . . . 'strongly deplores' Israel's policies and practices
denying the human rights of Palestinians. *
Resolution 607: " . . . 'calls' on Israel not to deport Palestinians and
strongly requests it to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention. *
Resolution 608: " . . . 'deeply regrets' that Israel has defied the United
Nations and deported Palestinian civilians". *
Resolution 636: " . . . 'deeply regrets' Israeli deportation of Palestinian
civilians. * Resolution 641: " . . . 'deplores' Israel's continuing
deportation of Palestinians. * Resolution 672: " . . . 'condemns' Israel for
violence against Palestinians at the Haram al-Sharif/Temple Mount. *
Resolution 673: " . . . 'deplores' Israel's refusal to cooperate with the
United Nations. Resolution 681: " . . . 'deplores' Israel's resumption of
the deportation of Palestinians. * Resolution 694: " . . . 'deplores'
Israel's deportation of Palestinians and calls on it to ensure their safe
and immediate return. *
Resolution 726: " . . . 'strongly condemns' Israel's deportation of
Palestinians. * Resolution 799: ". . . 'strongly condemns' Israel's
deportation of 413 Palestinians and calls for there immediate return.
1993 to 1995UNGA Res 50/21 - The Middle East Peace Process (Dec 12, 1995)
UNGA Res 50/22 - The Situation in the Middle East (Dec 12,
1995) UNGA Res 49/35 - Assistance to Palestinian Refugees (Jan 30 1995)
lUNGA Res 49/36 - Human Rights of Palestinian Refugees (Jan 30 1995) UNGA
Res 49/62 - Question of Palestine (Feb 3 1995) UNGA Res 49/78 - Nuclear
Proliferation in Mideast (Jan 11 1995) UNGA Res 49/87 - Situation in the
Middle East (Feb 7 1995) UNGA Res 49/88 - The Middle East Peace Process (Feb
7 1995) UNGA Res 49/149- Palestinian Right- Self-Determination (Feb 7 1995)
UNGA Res 48/213 - Assistance to Palestinian Refugees (Mar 15, 1994) UNGA Res
48/40 - UNRWA for Palestinian Refugees (Dec 13, 1993) UNGA Res 48/41 - Human
Rights in the Territories (Dec 10 1993) UNGA Res 48/58 - The Middle East
Peace Process (Dec 14 1993) UNGA Res 48/59 - The Situation in the Middle
East (Dec 14 1993) UNGA Res 48/71 - Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone in Mideast (Dec
16 1993) UNGA Res 48/78 - Israeli Nuclear Armament (Dec 16 1993) UNGA Res
48/94 - Self-Determination & Independence (Dec 20 1993) UNGA Res 48/124-
Non-interference in Elections (Dec 20 1993) UNGA Res 48/158- Question of
Palestine (Dec 20 1993) UNGA Res 48/212- Repercussions of Israeli
Settlements (Dec 21 1993) ==========+++===========
U.S. Vetoes of UN Resolutions Critical of Israel (1972-2002)
---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
Vetoes: 1972-1982 Subject Date & Meeting US Rep Casting Veto Vote Palestine:
Syrian-Lebanese Complaint. 3 power draft resolution 2/10784 9/10/1972 Bush
13-1, 1 Palestine: Examination of Middle East Situation. 8-power draft
resolution (S/10974) 7/2/1973 Scali 13-1, 0 (China not partic.) Palestine:
Egyptian-Lebanese Complaint. 5-power draft power resolution (S/11898)
12/8/1975 Moynihan 13-1, 1 Palestine: Middle East Problem, including
Palestinian question. 6- power draft resolution (S/11940) 1/26/1976 Moynihan
9-1,3 (China & Libya not partic.) Palestine: Situation in Occupied Arab
Territories. 5-power draft resolution (S/12022) 3/25/1976 Scranton 14-1,0
Palestine: Report on Committee on Rights of Palestinian People. 4- power
draft resolution (S/121119) 6/29/1976 Sherer 10-1,4 Palestine: Palestinian
Rights. Tunisian draft resolution. (S/13911) 4/30/1980 McHenry 10-1,4
Palestine: Golan Heights. Jordan draft resolution. (S/14832/Rev. 2)
1/20/1982 Kirkpatrick 9-1,5 Palestine: Situation in Occupied Territories,
Jordan draft resolution (S/14943) 4/2/1982 Lichenstein 13-1,1 Palestine:
Incident at the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem. 4-power draft resolution
4/20/1982 Kirpatrick 14-1, 0 Palestine: Conflict in Lebanon. Spain draft
resolution. (S/15185) 6/8/1982 Kirpatrick 14-1,0 Palestine: Conflict in
Lebanon. France draft resolution. (S/15255/Rev. 2) 6/26/1982 Lichenstein
14-1 Palestine: Conflict in Lebanon. USSR draft resolution. (S/15347/Rev. 1,
as orally amended) 8/6/1982 Lichenstein 11-1,3 Palestine: Situation in
Occupied Territories, 20-power draft resolution (S/15895) 8/2/1983
Lichenstein 13-1,1 Security Council Vetoes/Negative voting 1983-present
Subject Date Vote Occupied Arab Territories: Wholesale condemnation of
Israeli settlement policies - not adopted 1983 S. Lebanon: Condemns Israeli
action in southern Lebanon. S/16732 9/6/1984 Vetoed: 13-1 (U.S.), with 1
abstention (UK) Occupied Territories: Deplores "repressive measures" by
Israel against Arab population. S/19459. 9/13/1985 Vetoed: 10-1 (U.S.), with
4 abstentions (Australia, Denmark, UK, France) Lebanon: Condemns Israeli
practices against civilians in southern Lebanon. S/17000. 3/12/1985 Vetoed:
11-1 (U.S.), with 3 abstentions (Australia, Denmark, UK) Occupied
Territories: Calls upon Israel to respect Muslim holy places. S/17769/Rev. 1
1/30/1986 Vetoed: 13-1 (US), with one abstention (Thailand) Lebanon:
Condemns Israeli practices against civilians in southern Lebanon.
S/17730/Rev. 2. 1/17/1986 Vetoed: 11-1 (U.S.), with 3 abstentions
(Australia, Denmark, UK) Libya/Israel: Condemns Israeli interception of
Libyan plane. S/17796/Rev. 1. 2/6/1986 Vetoed: 10 -1 (US), with 4
abstentions (Australia, Denmark, France, UK) Lebanon: Draft strongly
deplored repeated Israeli attacks against Lebanese territory and other
measures and practices against the civilian population; (S/19434) 1/18/1988
vetoed 13-1 (US), with 1 abstention (UK) Lebanon: Draft condemned recent
invasion by Israeli forces of Southern Lebanon and Draft condemned recent
invasion by Israeli forces of Southern Lebanon and repeated a call for the
immediate withdrawal of all Israeli forces from Lebanese territory;
(S/19868) 5/10/1988 vetoed 14-1 (US) Lebanon: Draft strongly deplored the
recent Israeli attack against Lebanese territory on 9 December 1988;
(S/20322) 12/14/1988 vetoed 14-1 (US) Occupied territories: Draft called on
Israel to accept de jure applicability of the 4th Geneva Convention;
(S/19466) 1988 vetoed 14-1 (US) Occupied territories: Draft urged Israel to
abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention, rescind the order to deport
Palestinian civilians, and condemned policies and practices of Israel that
violate the human rights of the Palestinian people in the occupied
territories; (S/19780) 1988 vetoed 14-1 (US) Occupied territories: Strongly
deplored Israeli policies and practices in the occupied territories, and
strongly deplored also Israel's continued disregard of relevant Security
Council decisions. 2/17/1989 Vetoed 14-1 (US) Occupied territories:
Condemned Israeli policies and practices in the occupied territories.
6/9/1989 Vetoed 14-1 (US) Occupied territories: Deplored Israel's policies
and practices in the occupied territories. 11/7/1989 Vetoed 14-1 (US)
Occupied territories: NAM draft resolution to create a commission and send
three security council members to Rishon Lezion, where an Israeli gunmen
shot down seven Palestinian workers. 5/31/1990 Vetoed 14-1 (US) Middle East:
Confirms that the expropriation of land by Israel in East Jerusalem is
invalid and in violation of relevant Security Council resolutions and
provisions of the Fourth Geneva convention; expresses support of peace
process, including the Declaration of Principles of 9/13/1993 5/17/1995
Vetoed 14-1 (US) Middle East: Calls upon Israeli authorities to refrain from
all actions or measures, including settlement activities. 3/7/1997 Vetoed
14-1 (US) Middle East: Demands that Israel cease construction of the
settlement in east Jerusalem (called Jabal Abu Ghneim by the Palestinians
and Har Homa by Israel), as well as all the other Israeli settlement
activity in the occupied territories 3/21/1997 Vetoed 13-1,1 (US) Call for
UN Observers Force in West Bank, Gaza 3/27/2001 Vetoed 9-1 (US), with four
abstentions (Britain, France, Ireland and Norway) Condemned acts of terror,
demanded an end to violence and the establishment of a monitoring mechanism
to bring in observers. 12/15/2001 Vetoed 12-1 (US) with two abstentions
(Britain and Norway) Source: U.S. State Department
WAR CRIMES
<Lazar...@hotmail.com wrote in message
news:41fed7a5-ed48-4d06...@d36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
Treaties & Documents
by topic
Treaties & Documents
by date
Treaties & Documents
by Country
1949 Conventions &
Additional Protocols,
& their Commentaries
Print this page
Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time
of War. Geneva, 12 August 1949.
Full text [Display Introduction] [Display articles] [Display
commentaries]
Preamble
The undersigned Plenipotentiaries of the Governments represented at
the Diplomatic Conference held at Geneva from April 21 to August 12,
1949, for the purpose of establishing a Convention for the Protection
of Civilian Persons in Time of War, have agreed as follows:
Part I. General Provisions
Article 1. The High Contracting Parties undertake to respect and to
ensure respect for the present Convention in all circumstances.
Art. 2. In addition to the provisions which shall be implemented in
peace-time, the present Convention shall apply to all cases of
declared war or of any other armed conflict which may arise between
two or more of the High Contracting Parties, even if the state of war
is not recognized by one of them.
The Convention shall also apply to all cases of partial or total
occupation of the territory of a High Contracting Party, even if the
said occupation meets with no armed resistance.
Although one of the Powers in conflict may not be a party to the
present Convention, the Powers who are parties thereto shall remain
bound by it in their mutual relations. They shall furthermore be bound
by the Convention in relation to the said Power, if the latter accepts
and applies the provisions thereof.
Art. 3. In the case of armed conflict not of an international
character occurring in the territory of one of the High Contracting
Parties, each Party to the conflict shall be bound to apply, as a
minimum, the following
provisions:
(1) Persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including
members of armed forces who have laid down their arms and those placed
hors de combat by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause,
shall in all circumstances be treated humanely, without any adverse
distinction founded on race, colour, religion or faith, sex, birth or
wealth, or any other similar criteria.
To this end the following acts are and shall remain prohibited at any
time and in any place whatsoever with respect to the above-mentioned
persons:
(a) violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds,
mutilation, cruel treatment and torture;
(b) taking of hostages;
(c) outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and
degrading treatment;
(d) the passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions
without previous judgment pronounced by a regularly constituted court,
affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as
indispensable by civilized peoples.
(2) The wounded and sick shall be collected and cared for.
An impartial humanitarian body, such as the International Committee of
the Red Cross, may offer its services to the Parties to the conflict.
The Parties to the conflict should further endeavour to bring into
force, by means of special agreements, all or part of the other
provisions of the present Convention.
The application of the preceding provisions shall not affect the legal
status of the Parties to the conflict.
Art. 4. Persons protected by the Convention are those who, at a given
moment and in any manner whatsoever, find themselves, in case of a
conflict or occupation, in the hands of a Party to the conflict or
Occupying Power of which they are not nationals.
Nationals of a State which is not bound by the Convention are not
protected by it. Nationals of a neutral State who find themselves in
the territory of a belligerent State, and nationals of a co-
belligerent State, shall not be regarded as protected persons while
the State of which they are nationals has normal diplomatic
representation in the State in whose hands they are.
The provisions of Part II are, however, wider in application, as
defined in Article 13.
Persons protected by the Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the
Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field of 12
August 1949, or by the Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the
Condition of Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at
Sea of 12 August 1949, or by the Geneva Convention relative to the
Treatment of Prisoners of War of 12 August 1949, shall not be
considered as protected persons within the meaning of the present
Convention.
Art. 5 Where in the territory of a Party to the conflict, the latter
is satisfied that an individual protected person is definitely
suspected of or engaged in activities hostile to the security of the
State, such individual person shall not be entitled to claim such
rights and privileges under the present Convention as would, if
exercised in the favour of such individual person, be prejudicial to
the security of such State.
Where in occupied territory an individual protected person is detained
as a spy or saboteur, or as a person under definite suspicion of
activity hostile to the security of the Occupying Power, such person
shall, in those cases where absolute military security so requires, be
regarded as having forfeited rights of communication under the present
Convention.
In each case, such persons shall nevertheless be treated with humanity
and, in case of trial, shall not be deprived of the rights of fair and
regular trial prescribed by the present Convention. They shall also be
granted the full rights and privileges of a protected person under the
present Convention at the earliest date consistent with the security
of the State or Occupying Power, as the case may be.
Art. 6. The present Convention shall apply from the outset of any
conflict or occupation mentioned in Article 2.
In the territory of Parties to the conflict, the application of the
present Convention shall cease on the general close of military
operations.
In the case of occupied territory, the application of the present
Convention shall cease one year after the general close of military
operations; however, the Occupying Power shall be bound, for the
duration of the occupation, to the extent that such Power exercises
the functions of government in such territory, by the provisions of
the following Articles of the present Convention: 1 to 12, 27, 29 to
34, 47, 49, 51, 52, 53, 59, 61 to 77, 143.
Protected persons whose release, repatriation or re-establishment may
take place after such dates shall meanwhile continue to benefit by the
present Convention.
Art. 7. In addition to the agreements expressly provided for in
Articles 11, 14, 15, 17, 36, 108, 109, 132, 133 and 149, the High
Contracting Parties may conclude other special agreements for all
matters concerning which they may deem it suitable to make separate
provision. No special agreement shall adversely affect the situation
of protected persons, as defined by the present Convention, not
restrict the rights which it confers upon them.
Protected persons shall continue to have the benefit of such
agreements as long as the Convention is applicable to them, except
where express provisions to the contrary are contained in the
aforesaid or in subsequent agreements, or where more favourable
measures have been taken with regard to them by one or other of the
Parties to the conflict.
Art. 8. Protected persons may in no circumstances renounce in part or
in entirety the rights secured to them by the present Convention, and
by the special agreements referred to in the foregoing Article, if
such there be.
Art. 9. The present Convention shall be applied with the cooperation
and under the scrutiny of the Protecting Powers whose duty it is to
safeguard the interests of the Parties to the conflict. For this
purpose, the Protecting Powers may appoint, apart from their
diplomatic or consular staff, delegates from amongst their own
nationals or the nationals of other neutral Powers. The said delegates
shall be subject to the approval of the Power with which they are to
carry out their duties.
The Parties to the conflict shall facilitate to the greatest extent
possible the task of the representatives or delegates of the
Protecting Powers.
The representatives or delegates of the Protecting Powers shall not in
any case exceed their mission under the present Convention.
They shall, in particular, take account of the imperative necessities
of security of the State wherein they carry out their duties.
Art. 10. The provisions of the present Convention constitute no
obstacle to the humanitarian activities which the International
Committee of the Red Cross or any other impartial humanitarian
organization may, subject to the consent of the Parties to the
conflict concerned, undertake for the protection of civilian persons
and for their relief.
Art. 11. The High Contracting Parties may at any time agree to entrust
to an international organization which offers all guarantees of
impartiality and efficacy the duties incumbent on the Protecting
Powers by virtue of the present Convention.
When persons protected by the present Convention do not benefit or
cease to benefit, no matter for what reason, by the activities of a
Protecting Power or of an organization provided for in the first
paragraph above, the Detaining Power shall request a neutral State, or
such an organization, to undertake the functions performed under the
present Convention by a Protecting Power designated by the Parties to
a conflict.
If protection cannot be arranged accordingly, the Detaining Power
shall request or shall accept, subject to the provisions of this
Article, the offer of the services of a humanitarian organization,
such as the International Committee of the Red Cross, to assume the
humanitarian functions performed by Protecting Powers under the
present Convention.
Any neutral Power or any organization invited by the Power concerned
or offering itself for these purposes, shall be required to act with a
sense of responsibility towards the Party to the conflict on which
persons protected by the present Convention depend, and shall be
required to furnish sufficient assurances that it is in a position to
undertake the appropriate functions and to discharge them impartially.
No derogation from the preceding provisions shall be made by special
agreements between Powers one of which is restricted, even
temporarily, in its freedom to negotiate with the other Power or its
allies by reason of military events, more particularly where the
whole, or a substantial part, of the territory of the said Power is
occupied.
Whenever in the present Convention mention is made of a Protecting
Power, such mention applies to substitute organizations in the sense
of the present Article.
The provisions of this Article shall extend and be adapted to cases of
nationals of a neutral State who are in occupied territory or who find
themselves in the territory of a belligerent State in which the State
of which they are nationals has not normal diplomatic representation.
Art. 12. In cases where they deem it advisable in the interest of
protected persons, particularly in cases of disagreement between the
Parties to the conflict as to the application or interpretation of the
provisions of the present Convention, the Protecting Powers shall lend
their good offices with a view to settling the disagreement.
For this purpose, each of the Protecting Powers may, either at the
invitation of one Party or on its own initiative, propose to the
Parties to the conflict a meeting of their representatives, and in
particular of the authorities responsible for protected persons,
possibly on neutral territory suitably chosen. The Parties to the
conflict shall be bound to give effect to the proposals made to them
for this purpose. The Protecting Powers may, if necessary, propose for
approval by the Parties to the conflict a person belonging to a
neutral Power, or delegated by the International Committee of the Red
Cross, who shall be invited to take part in such a meeting.
Part II. General Protection of Populations Against Certain
Consequences of War
Art. 13. The provisions of Part II cover the whole of the populations
of the countries in conflict, without any adverse distinction based,
in particular, on race, nationality, religion or political opinion,
and are intended to alleviate the sufferings caused by war.
Art. 14. In time of peace, the High Contracting Parties and, after the
outbreak of hostilities, the Parties thereto, may establish in their
own territory and, if the need arises, in occupied areas, hospital and
safety zones and localities so organized as to protect from the
effects of war, wounded, sick and aged persons, children under
fifteen, expectant mothers and mothers of children under seven.
Upon the outbreak and during the course of hostilities, the Parties
concerned may conclude agreements on mutual recognition of the zones
and localities they have created. They may for this purpose implement
the provisions of the Draft Agreement annexed to the present
Convention, with such amendments as they may consider necessary.
The Protecting Powers and the International Committee of the Red Cross
are invited to lend their good offices in order to facilitate the
institution and recognition of these hospital and safety zones and
localities.
Art. 15. Any Party to the conflict may, either direct or through a
neutral State or some humanitarian organization, propose to the
adverse Party to establish, in the regions where fighting is taking
place, neutralized zones intended to shelter from the effects of war
the following persons, without
distinction:
(a) wounded and sick combatants or non-combatants;
(b) civilian persons who take no part in hostilities, and who, while
they reside in the zones, perform no work of a military character.
When the Parties concerned have agreed upon the geographical position,
administration, food supply and supervision of the proposed
neutralized zone, a written agreement shall be concluded and signed by
the representatives of the Parties to the conflict. The agreement
shall fix the beginning and the duration of the neutralization of the
zone.
Art. 16. The wounded and sick, as well as the infirm, and expectant
mothers, shall be the object of particular protection and respect.
As far as military considerations allow, each Party to the conflict
shall facilitate the steps taken to search for the killed and wounded,
to assist the shipwrecked and other persons exposed to grave danger,
and to protect them against pillage and ill-treatment.
Art. 17. The Parties to the conflict shall endeavour to conclude local
agreements for the removal from besieged or encircled areas, of
wounded, sick, infirm, and aged persons, children and maternity cases,
and for the passage of ministers of all religions, medical personnel
and medical equipment on their way to such areas.
Art. 18. Civilian hospitals organized to give care to the wounded and
sick, the infirm and maternity cases, may in no circumstances be the
object of attack but shall at all times be respected and protected by
the Parties to the conflict.
States which are Parties to a conflict shall provide all civilian
hospitals with certificates showing that they are civilian hospitals
and that the buildings which they occupy are not used for any purpose
which would deprive these hospitals of protection in accordance with
Article 19.
Civilian hospitals shall be marked by means of the emblem provided for
in Article 38 of the Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the
Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field of 12
August 1949, but only if so authorized by the State.
The Parties to the conflict shall, in so far as military
considerations permit, take the necessary steps to make the
distinctive emblems indicating civilian hospitals clearly visible to
the enemy land, air and naval forces in order to obviate the
possibility of any hostile action.
In view of the dangers to which hospitals may be exposed by being
close to military objectives, it is recommended that such hospitals be
situated as far as possible from such objectives.
Art. 19. The protection to which civilian hospitals are entitled shall
not cease unless they are used to commit, outside their humanitarian
duties, acts harmful to the enemy. Protection may, however, cease only
after due warning has been given, naming, in all appropriate cases, a
reasonable time limit and after such warning has remained unheeded.
The fact that sick or wounded members of the armed forces are nursed
in these hospitals, or the presence of small arms and ammunition taken
from such combatants and not yet been handed to the proper service,
shall not be considered to be acts harmful to the enemy.
Art. 20. Persons regularly and solely engaged in the operation and
administration of civilian hospitals, including the personnel engaged
in the search for, removal and transporting of and caring for wounded
and sick civilians, the infirm and maternity cases shall be respected
and protected.
In occupied territory and in zones of military operations, the above
personnel shall be recognizable by means of an identity card
certifying their status, bearing the photograph of the holder and
embossed with the stamp of the responsible authority, and also by
means of a stamped, water-resistant armlet which they shall wear on
the left arm while carrying out their duties. This armlet shall be
issued by the State and shall bear the emblem provided for in Article
38 of the Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of
the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field of 12 August 1949.
Other personnel who are engaged in the operation and administration of
civilian hospitals shall be entitled to respect and protection and to
wear the armlet, as provided in and under the conditions prescribed in
this Article, while they are employed on such duties. The identity
card shall state the duties on which they are employed.
The management of each hospital shall at all times hold at the
disposal of the competent national or occupying authorities an up-to-
date list of such personnel.
Art. 21. Convoys of vehicles or hospital trains on land or specially
provided vessels on sea, conveying wounded and sick civilians, the
infirm and maternity cases, shall be respected and protected in the
same manner as the hospitals provided for in Article 18, and shall be
marked, with the consent of the State, by the display of the
distinctive emblem provided for in Article 38 of the Geneva Convention
for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed
Forces in the Field of 12 August 1949.
Art.22. Aircraft exclusively employed for the removal of wounded and
sick civilians, the infirm and maternity cases or for the transport of
medical personnel and equipment, shall not be attacked, but shall be
respected while flying at heights, times and on routes specifically
agreed upon between all the Parties to the conflict concerned.
They may be marked with the distinctive emblem provided for in Article
38 of the Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of
the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field of 12 August 1949.
Unless agreed otherwise, flights over enemy or enemy occupied
territory are prohibited.
Such aircraft shall obey every summons to land. In the event of a
landing thus imposed, the aircraft with its occupants may continue its
flight after examination, if any.
Art. 23. Each High Contracting Party shall allow the free passage of
all consignments of medical and hospital stores and objects necessary
for religious worship intended only for civilians of another High
Contracting Party, even if the latter is its adversary. It shall
likewise permit the free passage of all consignments of essential
foodstuffs, clothing and tonics intended for children under fifteen,
expectant mothers and maternity cases.
The obligation of a High Contracting Party to allow the free passage
of the consignments indicated in the preceding paragraph is subject to
the condition that this Party is satisfied that there are no serious
reasons
for fearing:
(a) that the consignments may be diverted from their destination,
(b) that the control may not be effective, or
(c) that a definite advantage may accrue to the military efforts or
economy of the enemy through the substitution of the above-mentioned
consignments for goods which would otherwise be provided or produced
by the enemy or through the release of such material, services or
facilities as would otherwise be required for the production of such
goods.
The Power which allows the passage of the consignments indicated in
the first paragraph of this Article may make such permission
conditional on the distribution to the persons benefited thereby being
made under the local supervision of the Protecting Powers.
Such consignments shall be forwarded as rapidly as possible, and the
Power which permits their free passage shall have the right to
prescribe the technical arrangements under which such passage is
allowed.
Art.24. The Parties to the conflict shall take the necessary measures
to ensure that children under fifteen, who are orphaned or are
separated from their families as a result of the war, are not left to
their own resources, and that their maintenance, the exercise of their
religion and their education are facilitated in all circumstances.
Their education shall, as far as possible, be entrusted to persons of
a similar cultural tradition.
The Parties to the conflict shall facilitate the reception of such
children in a neutral country for the duration of the conflict with
the consent of the Protecting Power, if any, and under due safeguards
for the observance of the principles stated in the first paragraph.
They shall, furthermore, endeavour to arrange for all children under
twelve to be identified by the wearing of identity discs, or by some
other means.
Art. 25. All persons in the territory of a Party to the conflict, or
in a territory occupied by it, shall be enabled to give news of a
strictly personal nature to members of their families, wherever they
may be, and to receive news from them. This correspondence shall be
forwarded speedily and without undue delay.
If, as a result of circumstances, it becomes difficult or impossible
to exchange family correspondence by the ordinary post, the Parties to
the conflict concerned shall apply to a neutral intermediary, such as
the Central Agency provided for in Article 140, and shall decide in
consultation with it how to ensure the fulfilment of their obligations
under the best possible conditions, in particular with the cooperation
of the National Red Cross (Red Crescent, Red Lion and Sun) Societies.
If the Parties to the conflict deem it necessary to restrict family
correspondence, such restrictions shall be confined to the compulsory
use of standard forms containing twenty-five freely chosen words, and
to the limitation of the number of these forms despatched to one each
month.
Art. 26. Each Party to the conflict shall facilitate enquiries made by
members of families dispersed owing to the war, with the object of
renewing contact with one another and of meeting, if possible. It
shall encourage, in particular, the work of organizations engaged on
this task provided they are acceptable to it and conform to its
security regulations.
Part III. Status and Treatment of Protected Persons
Section I. Provisions common to the territories of the parties to the
conflict and to occupied territories
Art. 27. Protected persons are entitled, in all circumstances, to
respect for their persons, their honour, their family rights, their
religious convictions and practices, and their manners and customs.
They shall at all times be humanely treated, and shall be protected
especially against all acts of violence or threats thereof and against
insults and public curiosity.
Women shall be especially protected against any attack on their
honour, in particular against rape, enforced prostitutiOn, or any form
of indecent assault.
Without prejudice to the provisions relating to their state of health,
age and sex, all protected persons shall be treated with the same
consideration by the Party to the conflict in whose power they are,
without any adverse distinction based, in particular, on race,
religion or political opinion.
However, the Parties to the conflict may take such measures of control
and security in regard to protected persons as may be necessary as a
result of the war.
Art. 28. The presence of a protected person may not be used to render
certain points or areas immune from military operations.
Art. 29. The Party to the conflict in whose hands protected persons
may be, is responsible for the treatment accorded to them by its
agents, irrespective of any individual responsibility which may be
incurred.
Art. 30. Protected persons shall have every facility for making
application to the Protecting Powers, the International Committee of
the Red Cross, the National Red Cross (Red Crescent, Red Lion and Sun)
Society of the country where they may be, as well as to any
organization that might assist them.
These several organizations shall be granted all facilities for that
purpose by the authorities, within the bounds set by military or
security considerations.
Apart from the visits of the delegates of the Protecting Powers and of
the International Committee of the Red Cross, provided for by Article
143, the Detaining or Occupying Powers shall facilitate, as much as
possible, visits to protected persons by the representatives of other
organizations whose object is to give spiritual aid or material relief
to such persons.
Art. 31. No physical or moral coercion shall be exercised against
protected persons, in particular to obtain information from them or
from third parties.
Art. 32. The High Contracting Parties specifically agree that each of
them is prohibited from taking any measure of such a character as to
cause the physical suffering or extermination of protected persons in
their hands. This prohibition applies not only to murder, torture,
corporal punishments, mutilation and medical or scientific experiments
not necessitated by the medical treatment of a protected person, but
also to any other measures of brutality whether applied by civilian or
military agents.
Art. 33. No protected person may be punished for an offence he or she
has not personally committed. Collective penalties and likewise all
measures of intimidation or of terrorism are prohibited.
Pillage is prohibited.
Reprisals against protected persons and their property are prohibited.
Art. 34. The taking of hostages is prohibited.
Section II. Aliens in the territory of a party to the conflict
Art. 35. All protected persons who may desire to leave the territory
at the outset of, or during a conflict, shall be entitled to do so,
unless their departure is contrary to the national interests of the
State. The applications of such persons to leave shall be decided in
accordance with regularly established procedures and the decision
shall be taken as rapidly as possible. Those persons permitted to
leave may provide themselves with the necessary funds for their
journey and take with them a reasonable amount of their effects and
articles of personal use.
If any such person is refused permission to leave the territory, he
shall be entitled to have refusal reconsidered, as soon as possible by
an appropriate court or administrative board designated by the
Detaining Power for that purpose.
Upon request, representatives of the Protecting Power shall, unless
reasons of security prevent it, or the persons concerned object, be
furnished with the reasons for refusal of any request for permission
to leave the territory and be given, as expeditiously as possible, the
names of all persons who have been denied permission to leave.
Art. 36. Departures permitted under the foregoing Article shall be
carried out in satisfactory conditions as regards safety, hygiene,
sanitation and food. All costs in connection therewith, from the point
of exit in the territory of the Detaining Power, shall be borne by the
country of destination, or, in the case of accommodation in a neutral
country, by the Power whose nationals are benefited. The practical
details of such movements may, if necessary, be settled by special
agreements between the Powers concerned.
The foregoing shall not prejudice such special agreements as may be
concluded between Parties to the conflict concerning the exchange and
repatriation of their nationals in enemy hands.
Art. 37. Protected persons who are confined pending proceedings or
serving a sentence involving loss of liberty, shall during their
confinement be humanely treated.
As soon as they are released, they may ask to leave the territory in
conformity with the foregoing Articles.
Art. 38. With the exception of special measures authorized by the
present Convention, in particularly by Article 27 and 41 thereof, the
situation of protected persons shall continue to be regulated, in
principle, by the provisions concerning aliens in time of peace. In
any case, the following
rights shall be granted to them:
(1) they shall be enabled to receive the individual or collective
relief that may be sent to them.
(2) they shall, if their state of health so requires, receive medical
attention and hospital treatment to the same extent as the nationals
of the State concerned.
(3) they shall be allowed to practise their religion and to receive
spiritual assistance from ministers of their faith.
(4) if they reside in an area particularly exposed to the dangers of
war, they shall be authorized to move from that area to the same
extent as the nationals of the State concerned.
(5) children under fifteen years, pregnant women and mothers of
children under seven years shall benefit by any preferential treatment
to the same extent as the nationals of the State concerned.
Art. 39. Protected persons who, as a result of the war, have lost
their gainful employment, shall be granted the opportunity to find
paid employment. That opportunity shall, subject to security
considerations and to the provisions of Article 40, be equal to that
enjoyed by the nationals of the Power in whose territory they are.
Where a Party to the conflict applies to a protected person methods of
control which result in his being unable to support himself, and
especially if such a person is prevented for reasons of security from
finding paid employment on reasonable conditions, the said Party shall
ensure his support and that of his dependents.
Protected persons may in any case receive allowances from their home
country, the Protecting Power, or the relief societies referred to in
Article 30.
Art. 40. Protected persons may be compelled to work only to the same
extent as nationals of the Party to the conflict in whose territory
they are.
If protected persons are of enemy nationality, they may only be
compelled to do work which is normally necessary to ensure the
feeding, sheltering, clothing, transport and health of human beings
and which is not directly related to the conduct of military
operations.
In the cases mentioned in the two preceding paragraphs, protected
persons compelled to work shall have the benefit of the same working
conditions and of the same safeguards as national workers in
particular as regards wages, hours of labour, clothing and equipment,
previous training and compensation for occupational accidents and
diseases.
If the above provisions are infringed, protected persons shall be
allowed to exercise their right of complaint in accordance with
Article 30.
Art. 41. Should the Power, in whose hands protected persons may be,
consider the measures of control mentioned in the present Convention
to be inadequate, it may not have recourse to any other measure of
control more severe than that of assigned residence or internment, in
accordance with the provisions of Articles 42 and 43.
In applying the provisions of Article 39, second paragraph, to the
cases of persons required to leave their usual places of residence by
virtue of a decision placing them in assigned residence elsewhere, the
Detaining Power shall be guided as closely as possible by the
standards of welfare set forth in Part III, Section IV of this
Convention.
Art. 42. The internment or placing in assigned residence of protected
persons may be ordered only if the security of the Detaining Power
makes it absolutely necessary.
If any person, acting through the representatives of the Protecting
Power, voluntarily demands internment, and if his situation renders
this step necessary, he shall be interned by the Power in whose hands
he may be.
Art. 43. Any protected person who has been interned or placed in
assigned residence shall be entitled to have such action reconsidered
as soon as possible by an appropriate court or administrative board
designated by the Detaining Power for that purpose. If the internment
or placing in assigned residence is maintained, the court or
administrative board shall periodically, and at least twice yearly,
give consideration to his or her case, with a view to the favourable
amendment of the initial decision, if circumstances permit.
Unless the protected persons concerned object, the Detaining Power
shall, as rapidly as possible, give the Protecting Power the names of
any protected persons who have been interned or subjected to assigned
residence, or who have been released from internment or assigned
residence. The decisions of the courts or boards mentioned in the
first paragraph of the present Article shall also, subject to the same
conditions, be notified as rapidly as possible to the Protecting
Power.
Art. 44. In applying the measures of control mentioned in the present
Convention, the Detaining Power shall not treat as enemy aliens
exclusively on the basis of their nationality de jure of an enemy
State, refugees who do not, in fact, enjoy the protection of any
government.
Art. 45. Protected persons shall not be transferred to a Power which
is not a party to the Convention.
This provision shall in no way constitute an obstacle to the
repatriation of protected persons, or to their return to their country
of residence after the cessation of hostilities.
Protected persons may be transferred by the Detaining Power only to a
Power which is a party to the present Convention and after the
Detaining Power has satisfied itself of the willingness and ability of
such transferee Power to apply the present Convention. If protected
persons are transferred under such circumstances, responsibility for
the application of the present Convention rests on the Power accepting
them, while they are in its custody. Nevertheless, if that Power fails
to carry out the provisions of the present Convention in any important
respect, the Power by which the protected persons were transferred
shall, upon being so notified by the Protecting Power, take effective
measures to correct the situation or shall request the return of the
protected persons. Such request must be complied with.
In no circumstances shall a protected person be transferred to a
country where he or she may have reason to fear persecution for his or
her political opinions or religious beliefs.
The provisions of this Article do not constitute an obstacle to the
extradition, in pursuance of extradition treaties concluded before the
outbreak of hostilities, of protected persons accused of offences
against ordinary criminal law.
Art. 46. In so far as they have not been previously withdrawn,
restrictive measures taken regarding protected persons shall be
cancelled as soon as possible after the close of hostilities.
Restrictive measures affecting their property shall be cancelled, in
accordance with the law of the Detaining Power, as soon as possible
after the close of hostilities.
Section III. Occupied territories
Art. 47. Protected persons who are in occupied territory shall not be
deprived, in any case or in any manner whatsoever, of the benefits of
the present Convention by any change introduced, as the result of the
occupation of a territory, into the institutions or government of the
said territory, nor by any agreement concluded between the authorities
of the occupied territories and the Occupying Power, nor by any
annexation by the latter of the whole or part of the occupied
territory.
Art. 48. Protected persons who are not nationals of the Power whose
territory is occupied, may avail themselves of the right to leave the
territory subject to the provisions of Article 35, and decisions
thereon shall be taken according to the procedure which the Occupying
Power shall establish in accordance with the said Article.
Art. 49. Individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as
deportations of protected persons from occupied territory to the
territory of the Occupying Power or to that of any other country,
occupied or not, are prohibited, regardless of their motive.
Nevertheless, the Occupying Power may undertake total or partial
evacuation of a given area if the security of the population or
imperative military reasons so demand. Such evacuations may not
involve the displacement of protected persons outside the bounds of
the occupied territory except when for material reasons it is
impossible to avoid such displacement. Persons thus evacuated shall be
transferred back to their homes as soon as hostilities in the area in
question have ceased.
The Occupying Power undertaking such transfers or evacuations shall
ensure, to the greatest practicable extent, that proper accommodation
is provided to receive the protected persons, that the removals are
effected in satisfactory conditions of hygiene, health, safety and
nutrition, and that members of the same family are not separated.
The Protecting Power shall be informed of any transfers and
evacuations as soon as they have taken place.
The Occupying Power shall not detain protected persons in an area
particularly exposed to the dangers of war unless the security of the
population or imperative military reasons so demand.
The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own
civilian population into the territory it occupies.
Art. 50. The Occupying Power shall, with the cooperation of the
national and local authorities, facilitate the proper working of all
institutions devoted to the care and education of children.
The Occupying Power shall take all necessary steps to facilitate the
identification of children and the registration of their parentage. It
may not, in any case, change their personal status, nor enlist them in
formations or organizations subordinate to it.
Should the local institutions be inadequate for the purpose, the
Occupying Power shall make arrangements for the maintenance and
education, if possible by persons of their own nationality, language
and religion, of children who are orphaned or separated from their
parents as a result of the war and who cannot be adequately cared for
by a near relative or friend.
A special section of the Bureau set up in accordance with Article 136
shall be responsible for taking all necessary steps to identify
children whose identity is in doubt. Particulars of their parents or
other near relatives should always be recorded if available.
The Occupying Power shall not hinder the application of any
preferential measures in regard to food, medical care and protection
against the effects of war which may have been adopted prior to the
occupation in favour of children under fifteen years, expectant
mothers, and mothers of children under seven years.
Art. 51. The Occupying Power may not compel protected persons to serve
in its armed or auxiliary forces. No pressure or propaganda which aims
at securing voluntary enlistment is permitted.
The Occupying Power may not compel protected persons to work unless
they are over eighteen years of age, and then only on work which is
necessary either for the needs of the army of occupation, or for the
public utility services, or for the feeding, sheltering, clothing,
transportation or health of the population of the occupied country.
Protected persons may not be compelled to undertake any work which
would involve them in the obligation of taking part in military
operations. The Occupying Power may not compel protected persons to
employ forcible means to ensure the security of the installations
where they are performing compulsory labour.
The work shall be carried out only in the occupied territory where the
persons whose services have been requisitioned are. Every such person
shall, so far as possible, be kept in his usual place of employment.
Workers shall be paid a fair wage and the work shall be proportionate
to their physical and intellectual capacities. The legislation in
force in the occupied country concerning working conditions, and
safeguards as regards, in particular, such matters as wages, hours of
work, equipment, preliminary training and compensation for
occupational accidents and diseases, shall be applicable to the
protected persons assigned to the work referred to in this Article.
In no case shall requisition of labour lead to a mobilization of
workers in an organization of a military or semi-military character.
Art. 52. No contract, agreement or regulation shall impair the right
of any worker, whether voluntary or not and wherever he may be, to
apply to the representatives of the Protecting Power in order to
request the said Power's intervention.
All measures aiming at creating unemployment or at restricting the
opportunities offered to workers in an occupied territory, in order to
induce them to work for the Occupying Power, are prohibited.
Art. 53. Any destruction by the Occupying Power of real or personal
property belonging individually or collectively to private persons, or
to the State, or to other public authorities, or to social or
cooperative organizations, is prohibited, except where such
destruction is rendered absolutely necessary by military operations.
Art. 54. The Occupying Power may not alter the status of public
officials or judges in the occupied territories, or in any way apply
sanctions to or take any measures of coercion or discrimination
against them, should they abstain from fulfilling their functions for
reasons of conscience.
This prohibition does not prejudice the application of the second
paragraph of Article 51. It does not affect the right of the Occupying
Power to remove public officials from their posts.
Art. 55. To the fullest extent of the means available to it, the
Occupying Power has the duty of ensuring the food and medical supplies
of the population; it should, in particular, bring in the necessary
foodstuffs, medical stores and other articles if the resources of the
occupied territory are inadequate.
The Occupying Power may not requisition foodstuffs, articles or
medical supplies available in the occupied territory, except for use
by the occupation forces and administration personnel, and then only
if the requirements of the civilian population have been taken into
account. Subject to the provisions of other international Conventions,
the Occupying Power shall make arrangements to ensure that fair value
is paid for any requisitioned goods.
The Protecting Power shall, at any time, be at liberty to verify the
state of the food and medical supplies in occupied territories, except
where temporary restrictions are made necessary by imperative military
requirements.
Art. 56. To the fullest extent of the means available to it, the
Occupying Power has the duty of ensuring and maintaining, with the
cooperation of national and local authorities, the medical and
hospital establishments and services, public health and hygiene in the
occupied territory, with particular reference to the adoption and
application of the prophylactic and preventive measures necessary to
combat the spread of contagious diseases and epidemics. Medical
personnel of all categories shall be allowed to carry out their
duties.
If new hospitals are set up in occupied territory and if the competent
organs of the occupied State are not operating there, the occupying
authorities shall, if necessary, grant them the recognition provided
for in Article 18. In similar circumstances, the occupying authorities
shall also grant recognition to hospital personnel and transport
vehicles under the provisions of Articles 20 and 21.
In adopting measures of health and hygiene and in their
implementation, the Occupying Power shall take into consideration the
moral and ethical susceptibilities of the population of the occupied
territory.
Art. 57. The Occupying Power may requisition civilian hospitals of
hospitals only temporarily and only in cases of urgent necessity for
the care of military wounded and sick, and then on condition that
suitable arrangements are made in due time for the care and treatment
of the patients and for the needs of the civilian population for
hospital accommodation.
The material and stores of civilian hospitals cannot be requisitioned
so long as they are necessary for the needs of the civilian
population.
Art. 58. The Occupying Power shall permit ministers of religion to
give spiritual assistance to the members of their religious
communities.
The Occupying Power shall also accept consignments of books and
articles required for religious needs and shall facilitate their
distribution in occupied territory.
Art. 59. If the whole or part of the population of an occupied
territory is inadequately supplied, the Occupying Power shall agree to
relief schemes on behalf of the said population, and shall facilitate
them by all the means at its disposal.
Such schemes, which may be undertaken either by States or by impartial
humanitarian organizations such as the International Committee of the
Red Cross, shall consist, in particular, of the provision of
consignments of foodstuffs, medical supplies and clothing.
All Contracting Parties shall permit the free passage of these
consignments and shall guarantee their protection.
A Power granting free passage to consignments on their way to
territory occupied by an adverse Party to the conflict shall, however,
have the right to search the consignments, to regulate their passage
according to prescribed times and routes, and to be reasonably
satisfied through the Protecting Power that these consignments are to
be used for the relief of the needy population and are not to be used
for the benefit of the Occupying Power.
Art. 60. Relief consignments shall in no way relieve the Occupying
Power of any of its responsibilities under Articles 55, 56 and 59. The
Occupying Power shall in no way whatsoever divert relief consignments
from the purpose for which they are intended, except in cases of
urgent necessity, in the interests of the population of the occupied
territory and with the consent of the Protecting Power.
Art. 61. The distribution of the relief consignments referred to in
the foregoing Articles shall be carried out with the cooperation and
under the supervision of the Protecting Power. This duty may also be
delegated, by agreement between the Occupying Power and the Protecting
Power, to a neutral Power, to the International Committee of the Red
Cross or to any other impartial humanitarian body.
Such consignments shall be exempt in occupied territory from all
charges, taxes or customs duties unless these are necessary in the
interests of the economy of the territory. The Occupying Power shall
facilitate the rapid distribution of these consignments.
All Contracting Parties shall endeavour to permit the transit and
transport, free of charge, of such relief consignments on their way to
occupied territories.
Art. 62. Subject to imperative reasons of security, protected persons
in occupied territories shall be permitted to receive the individual
relief consignments sent to them.
Art. 63. Subject to temporary and exceptional measures imposed for
urgent reasons of security by the Occupying Power:
(a) recognized National Red Cross (Red Crescent, Red Lion and Sun)
Societies shall be able to pursue their activities in accordance with
Red Cross principles, as defined by the International Red Cross
Conferences. Other relief societies shall be permitted to continue
their humanitarian activities under similar conditions;
(b) the Occupying Power may not require any changes in the personnel
or structure of these societies, which would prejudice the aforesaid
activities.
The same principles shall apply to the activities and personnel of
special organizations of a non-military character, which already exist
or which may be established, for the purpose of ensuring the living
conditions of the civilian population by the maintenance of the
essential public utility services, by the distribution of relief and
by the organization of rescues.
Art. 64. The penal laws of the occupied territory shall remain in
force, with the exception that they may be repealed or suspended by
the Occupying Power in cases where they constitute a threat to its
security or an obstacle to the application of the present Convention.
Subject to the latter consideration and to the necessity for ensuring
the effective administration of justice, the tribunals of the occupied
territory shall continue to function in respect of all offences
covered by the said laws.
The Occupying Power may, however, subject the population of the
occupied territory to provisions which are essential to enable the
Occupying Power to fulfil its obligations under the present
Convention, to maintain the orderly government of the territory, and
to ensure the security of the Occupying Power, of the members and
property of the occupying forces or administration, and likewise of
the establishments and lines of communication used by them.
Art. 65. The penal provisions enacted by the Occupying Power shall not
come into force before they have been published and brought to the
knowledge of the inhabitants in their own language. The effect of
these penal provisions shall not be retroactive.
Art. 66. In case of a breach of the penal provisions promulgated by it
by virtue of the second paragraph of Article 64 the Occupying Power
may hand over the accused to its properly constituted, non-political
military courts, on condition that the said courts sit in the occupied
country. Courts of appeal shall preferably sit in the occupied
country.
Art. 67. The courts shall apply only those provisions of law which
were applicable prior to the offence, and which are in accordance with
general principles of law, in particular the principle that the
penalty shall be proportionate to the offence. They shall take into
consideration the fact the accused is not a national of the Occupying
Power.
Art. 68. Protected persons who commit an offence which is solely
intended to harm the Occupying Power, but which does not constitute an
attempt on the life or limb of members of the occupying forces or
administration, nor a grave collective danger, nor seriously damage
the property of the occupying forces or administration or the
installations used by them, shall be liable to internment or simple
imprisonment, provided the duration of such internment or imprisonment
is proportionate to the offence committed. Furthermore, internment or
imprisonment shall, for such offences, be the only measure adopted for
depriving protected persons of liberty. The courts provided for under
Article 66 of the present Convention may at their discretion convert a
sentence of imprisonment to one of internment for the same period.
The penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power in accordance
with Articles 64 and 65 may impose the death penalty against a
protected person only in cases where the person is guilty of
espionage, of serious acts of sabotage against the military
installations of the Occupying Power or of intentional offences which
have caused the death of one or more persons, provided that such
offences were punishable by death under the law of the occupied
territory in force before the occupation began.
The death penalty may not be pronounced against a protected person
unless the attention of the court has been particularly called to the
fact that since the accused is not a national of the Occupying Power,
he is not bound to it by any duty of allegiance.
In any case, the death penalty may not be pronounced on a protected
person who was under eighteen years of age at the time of the offence.
Art. 69. In all cases the duration of the period during which a
protected person accused of an offence is under arrest awaiting trial
or punishment shall be deducted from any period of imprisonment of
awarded.
Art. 70. Protected persons shall not be arrested, prosecuted or
convicted by the Occupying Power for acts committed or for opinions
expressed before the occupation, or during a temporary interruption
thereof, with the exception of breaches of the laws and customs of
war.
Nationals of the occupying Power who, before the outbreak of
hostilities, have sought refuge in the territory of the occupied
State, shall not be arrested, prosecuted, convicted or deported from
the occupied territory, except for offences committed after the
outbreak of hostilities, or for offences under common law committed
before the outbreak of hostilities which, according to the law of the
occupied State, would have justified extradition in time of peace.
Art. 71. No sentence shall be pronounced by the competent courts of
the Occupying Power except after a regular trial.
Accused persons who are prosecuted by the Occupying Power shall be
promptly informed, in writing, in a language which they understand, of
the particulars of the charges preferred against them, and shall be
brought to trial as rapidly as possible. The Protecting Power shall be
informed of all proceedings instituted by the Occupying Power against
protected persons in respect of charges involving the death penalty or
imprisonment for two years or more; it shall be enabled, at any time,
to obtain information regarding the state of such proceedings.
Furthermore, the Protecting Power shall be entitled, on request, to be
furnished with all particulars of these and of any other proceedings
instituted by the Occupying Power against protected persons.
The notification to the Protecting Power, as provided for in the
second paragraph above, shall be sent immediately, and shall in any
case reach the Protecting Power three weeks before the date of the
first hearing. Unless, at the opening of the trial, evidence is
submitted that the provisions of this Article are fully complied with,
the trial shall not proceed. The notification shall include the
following particulars:
(a) description of the accused;
(b) place of residence or detention;
(c) specification of the charge or charges (with mention of the penal
provisions under which it is brought);
(d) designation of the court which will hear the case;
(e) place and date of the first hearing.
Art. 72. Accused persons shall have the right to present evidence
necessary to their defence and may, in particular, call witnesses.
They shall have the right to be assisted by a qualified advocate or
counsel of their own choice, who shall be able to visit them freely
and shall enjoy the necessary facilities for preparing the defence.
Failing a choice by the accused, the Protecting Power may provide him
with an advocate or counsel. When an accused person has to meet a
serious charge and the Protecting Power is not functioning, the
Occupying Power, subject to the consent of the accused, shall provide
an advocate or counsel.
Accused persons shall, unless they freely waive such assistance, be
aided by an interpreter, both during preliminary investigation and
during the hearing in court. They shall have the right at any time to
object to the interpreter and to ask for his replacement.
Art.73. A convicted person shall have the right of appeal provided for
by the laws applied by the court. He shall be fully informed of his
right to appeal or petition and of the time limit within which he may
do so.
The penal procedure provided in the present Section shall apply, as
far as it is applicable, to appeals. Where the laws applied by the
Court make no provision for appeals, the convicted person shall have
the right to petition against the finding and sentence to the
competent authority of the Occupying Power.
Art. 74. Representatives of the Protecting Power shall have the right
to attend the trial of any protected person, unless the hearing has,
as an exceptional measure, to be held in camera in the interests of
the security of the Occupying Power, which shall then notify the
Protecting Power. A notification in respect of the date and place of
trial shall be sent to the Protecting Power.
Any judgement involving a sentence of death, or imprisonment for two
years or more, shall be communicated, with the relevant grounds, as
rapidly as possible to the Protecting Power. The notification shall
contain a reference to the notification made under Article 71 and, in
the case of sentences of imprisonment, the name of the place where the
sentence is to be served. A record of judgements other than those
referred to above shall be kept by the court and shall be open to
inspection by representatives of the Protecting Power. Any period
allowed for appeal in the case of sentences involving the death
penalty, or imprisonment of two years or more, shall not run until
notification of judgement has been received by the Protecting Power.
Art. 75. In no case shall persons condemned to death be deprived of
the right of petition for pardon or reprieve.
No death sentence shall be carried out before the expiration of a
period of a least six months from the date of receipt by the
Protecting Power of the notification of the final judgment confirming
such death sentence, or of an order denying pardon or reprieve.
The six months period of suspension of the death sentence herein
prescribed may be reduced in individual cases in circumstances of
grave emergency involving an organized threat to the security of the
Occupying Power or its forces, provided always that the Protecting
Power is notified of such reduction and is given reasonable time and
opportunity to make representations to the competent occupying
authorities in respect of such death sentences.
Art. 76. Protected persons accused of offences shall be detained in
the occupied country, and if convicted they shall serve their
sentences therein. They shall, if possible, be separated from other
detainees and shall enjoy conditions of food and hygiene which will be
sufficient to keep them in good health, and which will be at least
equal to those obtaining in prisons in the occupied country.
They shall receive the medical attention required by their state of
health.
They shall also have the right to receive any spiritual assistance
which they may require.
Women shall be confined in separate quarters and shall be under the
direct supervision of women.
Proper regard shall be paid to the special treatment due to minors.
Protected persons who are detained shall have the right to be visited
by delegates of the Protecting Power and of the International
Committee of the Red Cross, in accordance with the provisions of
Article 143.
Such persons shall have the right to receive at least one relief
parcel monthly.
Art. 77. Protected persons who have been accused of offences or
convicted by the courts in occupied territory, shall be handed over at
the close of occupation, with the relevant records, to the authorities
of the liberated territory.
Art. 78. If the Occupying Power considers it necessary, for imperative
reasons of security, to take safety measures concerning protected
persons, it may, at the most, subject them to assigned residence or to
internment.
Decisions regarding such assigned residence or internment shall be
made according to a regular procedure to be prescribed by the
Occupying Power in accordance with the provisions of the present
Convention. This procedure shall include the right of appeal for the
parties concerned. Appeals shall be decided with the least possible
delay. In the event of the decision being upheld, it shall be subject
to periodical review, if possible every six months, by a competent
body set up by the said Power.
Protected persons made subject to assigned residence and thus required
to leave their homes shall enjoy the full benefit of Article 39 of the
present Convention.
Kenneth McVay OBC
mose <mo...@capp.com> wrote:
There is no evidence that the so-called "Australian forensics team"
either existed OR visited Treblinka.
There is no evidence that Richard Krege, a supposed "qualified electronics
engineer" exists, and there is no evidence worldwide that any report of
the findings of this alleged "forensic examination" has ever been
peer reviewed, let alone published.
It's been 9 years since this alleged "examination," and yet there is no
evidence the "team" or the "engineer" existed or exist today, and there is
no evidence whatsoever they tested anything, anywhere.
Furthermore, there is no evidence that any "National Association of
Forensic Criminologists, Archeologists, Skeptics and Historians" exists or
ever did exist.
In spite of video claims that the data were widely examined by experts
worldwide, no evidence exists that this is true, and none of the legion of
supposed "experts" has ever stepped forward to confirm the claim.
Where is the $100,000 supposedly being offered as a reward? In what trust
account has it been deposited?
Where is the legal evidence of such a deposit?
Well?
--
Who is your choice for the Dumbest celebrity? George W. Bush
holds a commanding lead at 27.8%, Kurt Knoll is second at
20.7% & Paris Hilton 3rd with 16%. VOTE NOW,
VOTE OFTEN: http://squidoo.com/think-you-are-stupid-eh
Kenneth McVay OBC
mose <mo...@capp.com> wrote:
[bullshit expunged]
Hey Bubba, when are you going to identify the location
of the NAFCASH Trust, and name the Trustees?
Are you still looking for the information? How's that
working out for you?
Here's another racist moron... except he is smarter
than you are, as you can see from his inciteful
thoughts:
170 Statements Illustrating Leading Revisionist Scholar Kurt Knoll's
strict adherence to the highest intellectual standards of Holocaust
denial... folks, with intellects like Knoll's to guide them, Holocaust
deniers cannot but achieve monumental failures and continuing
humiliations:
(See http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/k/knoll-kurt/ for
the first 164 -- (Honest, Folks, I'm not making them up!)
165. "What Nazi crab look at your own fabrications."
<gSwnm.42278$Db2.2387@edtnps83>, Sept. 3, 2009
166. "I personally think the use this holocaust denial crab
to scare others." <NXRom.42961$Db2.7658@edtnps83>,
Sept. 6, 2009
167. "Intersting what date what posings heading i am courious."
<0igpm.44144$PH1.22994@edtnps82>, Sept. 7, 2009
168. "We are talking about gassings don't we."
<vEgpm.44148$PH1.40649@edtnps82>, Sept. 7, 2009
169. "Only the naive will belive what Wiesenthal says edjucatet
people can think for themselfs."
<vNvqm.43567$Db2.12876@edtnps83>, Sept. 12, 2009
170. "People who wend to university should have a higher education.
When they come out latter on the are full of arrogance and
not considered normal human being. We say here this fuckers
did have their education in a slime factory and their arrogance
is very apparent visible. " <qG7vm.46534$PH1.45557@edtnps82>,
Sept.25, 2009
mose
"Kenneth McVay OBC" <kmc...@shell.vex.net> wrote in message
news:UtidnepC8ZIW5abW...@vex.net...
> In article <tqH_m.65754$ze1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
> mose <mo...@capp.com> wrote:
>
> [bullshit expunged]
>
THIS GUY IS A COMPLETE HALFWIT OR WINGNUTCASE. POSSIBLY TO DO WITH FOLLOWING
THE TALMUD AND CONSISTENTLY BACKSTABBING YOUR FELLOW COUNTRYMEN. CHECK THE
Talmud
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-6657600254881054584&hl=en
DONT JUST HAVE TO TAKE TED'S WORD
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/talmudtruth.html
http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/talmud.htm
http://www.iahushua.com/JQ/talmud.html
http://abbc6.com/victims/index.htm
THE VICTIMS OF JEWISH VICTIMIZETION TO PROTECT THE FRAUDELENT REPARATION
CLAIMS. AND WHY THE FRAUD HAS NOT BEEN EXPOSED.
CHECK THE WHOLE HOLOHOAXING BUNCH.
The Alternative Tour of Auschwitz: An Independent Investigation of the
1-http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4138523842550891901#0h53m09s
2- http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8424408632716421689
Rassinier seems to wrap it up. NOT A DENIER A MAN IN THE CAMPS AS A
PRISONER FOR HELPING JEWS, BUT ABSOLUTELY ANNOYED BY THE LIES THE JEWS WERE
TELLING.
A French resistance fighter and friend of the Jews, he was imprisoned by the
Germans for his illegal activities in Buchenwald and Camp Dora where he
worked in the underground rocket factories.
Barred from entering Germany for trying to give testimony for the defense in
HOLOCAUST trials .
http://www.ihr.org/books/rassinier/debunking1-0.html
http://www.ihr.org/books/hoggan/A4.html
"Die Auschwitz-L�ge", (The Auschwitz Lie)
As a German agrarian expert, Christophersen was stationed at Auschwitz in
the critical period 1943-44. As a German expert, he had access to the entire
camp. He took valuable photographs at the time. He was the first Revisionist
eyewitness to come forward stating categorically that there were no gas
chambers for killing humans in Auschwitz. He wrote the famous booklet, "Die
Auschwitz-L�ge", (The Auschwitz Lie) translated into many languages. Z�ndel
(http://www.amazon.com/Perpetual-Peace-Harry-Elmer-Barnes/dp/0939484013
http://www.courts.fsnet.co.uk/harryelmerbarnes.htm
http://www.whale.to/b/trial_1988.html
for several US penal institutions. He was sent by Ernst Z�ndel to
investigate Auschwitz, Majdanek, Dachau, Hartheim and other alleged "Nazi
Death Camps" and "gassing facilities." Author of the devastating series of
Leuchter Reports. (I, II, III, IV) and many articles and videotaped
presentations that resulted from these investigations, Leuchter was
blacklisted in the US and hounded by the Holocaust Promotion Lobby and the
world's lapdog media. He was arrested and jailed in Germany for giving an
anti-Holocaust lecture for G�nther Deckert, a well-known political party
leader. Allowed out on bail, Leuchter returned to the US. and chose not to
go back to Germany to stand trial. Nonetheless, he lost his livelihood as a
result. Sensational Z�ndel witness in the Great Holocaust Trial in 1988.
Leuchter, although present in the courtroom in Munich, was not allowed to
testify about his research findings in Auschwitz for Ernst Z�ndel in the
German (Munich) Trial in 1991.
Dr. Faurisson first discovered the technical and architectural drawings of
the Auschwitz morgues, the crematories and other installations. He was also
the first to insist that only a U.S. gas chamber expert could unravel the
technical impossibility of the Auschwitz homicidal gassing story - as
falsely told to the public for over half a century.
Emil Lachout
Mercilessly hounded by Austrian authorities and the Austrian lapdog media
for over a decade. Forced to undergo a humiliating psychiatric assessment.
He ultimately won his case in the European Court of Human Rights. Austria
must pay him compensation but hasn't done yet
This War is for Us
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/2125
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Culture_of_Critique_series
http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/books.htm
http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/PrefacePPB.pdf
http://www.thenausea.com/elements/thenotforgotten/rachel/index.html
http://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/16/rafah.death/
One guy gets 10 years, the other gets a raise and promotion?? For killing
a non jewish american? And gets to smirk about it?
http://www.jonathanpollard.org/1993/051693.htm
Compounding the duplicity swirling around the case was the jurors'
remarkable verdict: Mr. Nelson was indeed guilty of depriving his victim of
his civil rights by stabbing him - but not by killing him. Thus, instead of
a possible life sentence, the murderer, with credit for time served, may be
a free man in a matter of months.
http://www.jlaw.com/Commentary/3dayriot.html
It is thus with intense interest that we watch as a federal jury in Brooklyn
hears the case of United States vs. Lemrick Nelson, Jr. and Charles Price --
respectively, the accused killer of Yankel Rosenbaum, and the man charged
with inciting the mob that pursued Rosenbaum. As Coalition goes to press,
the trial has finally begun and the prosecution is presenting powerful
evidence against the two defendants
http://www.thenausea.com/elements/thenotforgotten/rachel/index.html
http://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/16/rafah.death/
2. Rachel Corrie Memorial Web Site
In Memoriam ~ Rachel Corrie ~ 1979 - 2003. Rachel's E-mails | Statements |
News Reports & Editorials | Memorials | Related Issues ...
http://www.rachelcorrie.org/
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0123-07.htm
http://www.time.com/time/europe/hero/caoimhebutterly.html
That's where a bullet fired by an Israeli soldier found her, hitting her
thigh as she tried to lead a group of Palestinian children to safety. The
24-year-old Dubliner was luckier than British peace activist Ton Hurndall
who, in similar circumstances this month in Gaza, was shot in the head and
now lies in a coma. Seven months earlier, Butterly spent 16 days inside
Yasser Arafat's besieged compound in Ramallah. She had gone in as an
ambulance volunteer, to give first aid to a man who had been shot, but she
refused to leave.
http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article1360.shtml
The tank was already in its parking spot when we arrived, and was shooting
into the area. A nearby security tower had also joined in, and was firing
the scary sniper shots. We were positioned behind a large roadblock deciding
what to do, and Laura had gone forward with some Palestinians to take a
look. She was wearing our trademarked florescent orange jacket with
reflective stripes, and was clearly an international.
Despite, or possibly because of this they shot around her. She said that
shots were being fired on both sides of her, making it rather difficult for
her to move. She had just rejoined us, when the sniper fire from the tower
turned onto the roadblock behind which we were standing. There were children
playing on the roadblock, as they often do, and many scattered due to the
gunfire.
There was one boy, however, that Tab noticed was too frightened to move.
Instinctually, he quickly removed him from the area, as he observed shots
land around the small and fragile innocent. After successfully evacuating
him, he was about to leave when he noticed two small girls down in front of
the roadblock, right in the line of fire.
He was going to help them escape when the Israeli soldier in the tower took
his aim, and fired a large calibre sniper bullet directly into Tab's head.
He was in full view of the tower, and like Laura was wearing the high
visibility gear. Our embassies had been informed of our presence in the
President Andrew Jackson,
President Andrew Jackson, the only one of our presidents whose
administration totally abolished the National Debt, condemned the
international bankers as a "den of vipers" which he was determined to "rout
out" of the fabric of American life. Jackson claimed that if only the
American people understood how these vipers operated on the American scene
"there would a revolution before morning." http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=99
In 1828, immediately upon his election as the new President of the US,
President Andrew Jackson began an investigation of the Second Bank of the
United States. President Jackson argued that the bank was privately owned
with stockholders from foreign nations who had political agendas at odds
with the United States. President Jackson, an avowed Christian, is known for
these famous words against the Rothschilds:
- "You are a den of thieves vipers, and I intend to rout you out, and by the
Eternal God, I will rout you out." -
http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=99
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hZAKsQbhLI&NR=1
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/slavery.htm
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/dimona.htm
We welcomed the former Prime Minister's strong reaffirmation that Dimona
will be devoted exclusively to peaceful purposes and the reaffirmation also
of Israel's willingness to permit periodic visits to Dimona.
http://www.rense.com/general24/bmb.htm
Israel And The Bomb
By Avner Cohen
A Choice Outstanding Academic Book
". . . Avner Cohen's book stands in a class of its own. It is the first
scholarly study of the history of this project, it is richly documented, and
it unveils some of the major mysteries surrounding events by tapping a large
body of previously untouched sources. . . . It can only be assumed that when
this national mood of 'nuclear' ignorance changes, Cohen's book will serve
as a solid foundation for this debate." -- Uri Bar-Joseph, Jewish History
"Cohen's book hits nation's sensitivity." -- Dan Ephron, Washington Times
"Cohen's work will necessitate the rewriting of Israel's history, wars,
international relations, domestic political crises, economy, psychology,
national pride--everything will have to be viewed in a different
light." --Tom Segev, Ha'aretz
"This is an extraordinarily important book. Cohen has produced an amazing
piece of historical scholarship on a subject deliberately shrouded in clouds
of misdirection, for legitimate raisons d�etat, by both Israeli and American
governments." -- Samuel W. Lewis, U.S. Ambassador to Israel (1977-1985)
"This impeccably documented history of the first two decades of the Israeli
nuclear program illuminates the complex domestic and international forces
that shaped the activity and gives the reader fascinating insight into the
thinking of Israeli, French, and U.S. leaders on the uniquely sensitive
subject that only a few participants were fully aware of at the
time." --Spurgeon Keeny, President and Executive Director, The Arms Control
Association
PAUL FINDLAY, FRANCIS BOYLE, EUGENE BIRD, EDWARD PECK,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=ES&hl=es&v=ynWjYHP91gA&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=ES&hl=es&v=ynWjYHP91gA&feature=related