US and UN Leave Gaza to Misery; Israel Continues Illegal Settlements elsewhere
EconomicDemocracy Coop
the United Nations, should take note of the dire situation in Gaza,"
said Falk.
"The ordeal of the 1.5 million residents of Gaza affected by the
Israeli blockade, over half of whom are children, has been allowed to
continue without any formal objection by governments and at the UN."
Falk said a three-year blockade had stopped enough food and medicine
reaching civilians in Gaza, harming their physical and mental health,
and was still hampering reconstruction.
..The UN Special Rapporteur for the Occupied Palestinian Territories,
Richard Falk, urged Israel's European and North American allies to
press for the immediate end of the blockade "backed up by a credible
threat of economic sanctions."
And from second story below: "In Jerusalem, of course, the settlement
activity is in full swing. Palestinian families are thrown out of
their homes to the jubilant cries of the settlers, and the few Israeli
protesters against the injustice are sent to hospitals and prisons. "
= = =Full:
UN expert slams "tragic" international failure in Gaza
(AFP) – 4 hours ago
GENEVA — A UN human rights expert on Wednesday condemned a "tragic
failure" by major powers to end Israel's blockade of the Gaza Strip or
probe alleged war crimes committed during a military offensive one
year ago.
The UN Special Rapporteur for the Occupied Palestinian Territories,
Richard Falk, urged Israel's European and North American allies to
press for the immediate end of the blockade "backed up by a credible
threat of economic sanctions."
"There is no evidence of meaningful international pressure being
brought to bear to end the blockade or to ensure that Israeli and
Hamas officials are held accountable for alleged war crimes
perpetrated during the Gaza attacks," he said in a statement.
"This represents both a tragic failure of responsibility by the
powerful governments of the world and of the UN," he added.
Israel launched a devastating 22 day military offensive dubbed
Operation Cast Lead on the Hamas-ruled territory on December 27, 2008.
"People of conscience everywhere, as well as governments worldwide and
the United Nations, should take note of the dire situation in Gaza,"
said Falk.
"The ordeal of the 1.5 million residents of Gaza affected by the
Israeli blockade, over half of whom are children, has been allowed to
continue without any formal objection by governments and at the UN."
Falk said a three-year blockade had stopped enough food and medicine
reaching civilians in Gaza, harming their physical and mental health,
and was still hampering reconstruction.
He also called for full and swift implementation of the conclusions of
a UN human rights investigation led by Richard Goldstone.
The Goldstone report adopted in October recommended that Israel and
Hamas should face possible prosecution at the International Criminal
Court, if they fail to conduct credible investigations into war crimes
within six months.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5ihcEH6irno6OtTLRNfqw4KhEHgyQ
==========Meanwhile, on the Settlements:
In all the long Oslo speech, Obama devoted 16 whole words to us: “We
see it in Middle East, as the conflict between Arabs and Jews seems to
harden.”
Well, first of all, it is not a conflict between Arabs and Jews. It is
between Palestinians and Israelis. That is an important difference:
when one wants to solve a problem, one must first have a clear picture
of it.
More importantly: This is the remark of a bystander. A viewer sitting
in his armchair and looking at the TV screen. A theater critic
reviewing a performance. Should the President of the United States
look at the conflict like this?
If the conflict is indeed hardening, the US, and Obama personally,
must carry much of the blame. His folding up on the settlement issue
and his total surrender to the pro-Israel lobby in the US has
encouraged our government to believe that it can do anything it likes.
At the beginning, Binyamin Netanyahu was worried about the new
president. But the fear has dissipated, and now our government is
treating Obama and his people with scorn bordering on contempt. The
agreements made with the last administration are being broken quite
openly. President George W. Bush recognized the “settlement blocs” in
return for an undertaking to freeze all the others permanently and to
dismantle the outposts set up since March 2001. Not only has not a
single outpost been dismantled, but this week the government accorded
the status of “preferred area” to dozens of settlements outside the
“blocs”, including the worst Kahanist nests. From one of these, the
thugs went out this week and set fire to a mosque.
The “freeze” is a joke. In this theater of the absurd, the settlers
take part in a performance of violent opposition that is both invited
and paid for by the government. The police does not employ against
them pepper gas, tear gas, rubber bullets and truncheons – as they do
every week against Israeli demonstrators who protest against the
occupation. Nor do they conduct nightly incursions in the settlements
to arrest activists – as they do now in Bilin and other Palestinian
villages.
In Jerusalem, of course, the settlement activity is in full swing.
Palestinian families are thrown out of their homes to the jubilant
cries of the settlers, and the few Israeli protesters against the
injustice are sent to hospitals and prisons. The settler groups
engaged in these activities receive donations from the US that are tax-
deductible – thus Obama is indirectly paying for the very acts he
condemns.
exerpted from 86 year old Israeli peace activist and vetaran,Uri
Avnery's piece at
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery/1261273531/
More: http://gush-shalom.org
ALSO:
Answers to the false security claims
supporting the Separation Wall
http://www.gush-shalom.org/security/english.html
and Israeli violations of the Road Map to peace:
http://www.gush-shalom.org/roadmap/start.html
this is written by an Isareli group.
Siobhan Medeiros
wrote:
>
> and Israeli violations of the Road Map to peace:http://www.gush-shalom.org/roadmap/start.html
>
> this is written by an Isareli group.
Actually, I've heard that after his meeting with Obama, Netayanhu got
serious about freezing construction. So much so that there was a
massive protest by Israeli settlers. Maybe Obama finally threatened
to take away his blank check.
Stan de SD
> the United Nations, should take note of the dire situation in Gaza,"
> said Falk.
Funny what happens when you choose to be represented by fruitcake
terrorist groups like Hamas. You reap what you sow, Gazans...
Al Smith
What exactly have the Palestinian babies and little children sowed?
-Al-
Stan de SD
What have the Israeli babies and little children sowed? FYI, the
Israelis, unlike the Paleosimians, aren't attacking women and
children. Unfortunately, Pallies had a bad habit as of 1-2 years ago
of using schools, hospitals, and apartment buildings for setting up
mortars and rocket launchers. If anyone is genuinely surprised that a
rocket launcher or mortar firing on civilian targets in Israel is
eventually targeted for elimination, they are not very bright.
Topaz
How To Explain American Apathy Over Israeli Killings of Palestinian
Children?
By Stephen J. Sosebee
Nothing has deepened the collective despair that is life in
Palestine today more than the killing of children, nor has any one
dimension produced greater anger and fuel for the intifada. Though it
may be so common now that it is hardly noticed in Israel, every
injured or dead child is mourned by the 1.7 million Palestinians
resisting occupation.
"They steal our land, imprison our leaders, and deny us our flag
and peace, but we will forgive them when we have our state, " said the
father of Said, a boy killed in Rafah. "But to keep shooting our
children; this I cannot forgive..."
A week after Said's death, his 19-year-old brother was also
killed by IDF troops in Rafah.
Some places in Palestine seem to have become Israeli free-fire
zones for children. In the Shatti refugee camp in Gaza, for example,
10 of the 19 civilians shot dead by the IDF during the uprising have
been under 16 years of age. Among them were three girls, a 3-year-old,
a 6-year-old and a 1 0-year-old, all shot to death within a
three-month period at the end of 1989.
"Do the Israelis think that by shooting our children they can
make us submit?" asks Ahmed, a Shatti resident. "Is it supposed to cow
us or lessen our resolve? Every new martyr confirms again to all why
we must rid ourselves of this occupation."
While the blood of Palestinian children obviously seems cheap to
the Israeli soldiers spilling it, Palestinian parents are at a loss to
understand how the Israeli public justifies and the American public
ignores the killing of their children.
"When my son was killed the entire camp defied the curfew and
beatings to pay him respect," says the mother of Bassani, a
12-year-old killed by an Israeli Defense Forces sniper while tending
sheep during the curfew last February. "The people know his blood is
for Palestine and they supported us during our pain and loss. There is
no greater sacrifice than to lose your child, and there is nothing
greater to sacrifice for than your freedom and country. Still, it
hurts so."
Whether American correspondents are to blame, or whether the
fault lies with dishonest editors, US newspapers are not informing the
American public concerning the frequency with which Palestinian
children have been killed by Israeli soldiers over the past four
years. From Dec. 12, 1990 to April 1, 199 1, for example, 14
Palestinian children under the age of 16 were shot dead. During the
same period of time in the first year of the intifada, 15 kids were
killed by gunfire. In all, 239 children have been killed by Israeli
forces during the uprising, while more than 55,000 more have been
seriously wounded.
"What is the most disturbing fact about the numbers concerning
injured children is that the soldiers don't seem to care who is in the
sight at the end of their rifles when they pull the trigger," says Dr.
Adnan Marshoud, a physician at Shifa Hospital in Gaza. "To most of
them, we must be animals, not living and breathing human beings. They
don't consider that we love our children, or the pain and anger that
burns us when our children are killed or injured."
According to UNRWA statistics compiled just in the Gaza Strip
from the start of the intifada to the first of March this year, 19,715
children under the age of 15 required medical attention due to IDF
acts of violence. Of these, 2,590 were wounded by live ammunition, not
rubber bullets.
"What do they say in America to justify shooting our children?"
is perhaps the most common question asked of foreigners in Palestine.
Always, I wonder if "they don't know" can really be an acceptable
answer.
Rivaling the absolute evil in any situation in which soldiers
kill unarmed civilians (not to mention children) are the tactics of
hard-line supporters of present Israeli government policies. It defies
logic to claim moral superiority and refuse to talk with the PLO
because it is just a "terrorist organization," while Israeli troops
continue to entrap and shoot children on a rather consistent basis.
Even more sickening is the hypocrisy displayed by all sides of
Israel's political establishment, as if Israel's leaders are not
really responsible for the acts that take place on the ground in
Palestine. How is it Defense Minister Moshe Arens can call the Arabs
"an uncivilized people" who "don't value human life, " when Israeli
troops have killed dozens and maimed hundreds of children just in the
period he has been minister of defense. Is he really such a hypocrite,
or does he truly think the circumstances and manner in which his
troops have shot children indiscriminately go unnoticed?
And who can still believe Yossi Sarid, a left-wing politican
from the "peace camp, " when he writes that the "stray bullets" that
"find" Palestinian children "pierced our hearts as well"? Leaders with
"pierced hearts" would demand that their own children stop the
slaughter in which more than 10,000 Palestinian children have been
shot over a four-year period.
Four years is enough time for both Israelis and Palestinians to
contemplate the directions in which they are heading, and to alter
their course if it involves acts for which they do not wish to be held
responsible.
Zion has decided that land is of greater value than the lives of
those living on it. For its part, the occupied population has pledged
not to submit to foreign domination, whatever the costs and suffering.
Thus, it seems the unequal relationship that has spilled so much
needless blood is to continue to be one based on domination and
hatred. And, unless Israelis come to their senses, or Americans refuse
to further condone their actions, the killing of Palestinian children
will continue unabated.
Stephen J. Sosebee is a free-lance writer who divides his time
between Ohio and occupied Palestine.
http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org
http://heretical.com/ http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/
Stan de SD
> How To Explain American Apathy Over Israeli Killings of Palestinian
> Children?
>
> By Stephen J. Sosebee
>
> Nothing has deepened the collective despair that is life in
> Palestine today more than the killing of children, nor has any one
> dimension produced greater anger and fuel for the intifada. Though it
> may be so common now that it is hardly noticed in Israel, every
> injured or dead child is mourned by the 1.7 million Palestinians
> resisting occupation.
As to be expected, our resident Nazi and anti-semite chimes in to
portray the poor widdle Pallies as "victims". The fact of the matter
is that it is Hamaz, Hizbollah, and other other terrorist/militant/
fruitcake groups in the Palestinian terroritories that kill children.
Hamas and other Palestinian groups use homicide bombers (sometimes
children themselves) to target Israeli civilians and children on
school buses, in ice cream parlors, in day care centers and anywhere
else they can MAXIMIZE the loss of innocent life. In addition, Hamas
is responsible for the death of PALESTINIAN children by setting up
mortar and rocket launchers in schools, hospitals, apartment buildings
and other buildings and facilities in civilian neighborhoods, in
direct violation of the Geneva Convention. In effect it is Hamas who
is killing Palestinian children as part of a deliberate policy of
maximizing Palestinian casualties and inflaming the Arab world.
The fact of the matter is that an unholy alliance of Lefty Liberal goo-
goos and neo-Nazi thugs deliberately distorts the Palestinian
conflict. There is no distinct ethnic "Palestinian" identity nor was
there ever an organic Palestinian national movement. The
"Palestinian" people (i.e. the occupants of the West Bank and the
Gaza Strip) merely serve as cannon fodder as part of the ongoing proxy
war against Israel by the Arab states. The fact that the citizens of
the Gaza Strip have freely voted a known terrorist organization to be
their elected representatives doesn't help the situation either.
Groups like Hamas and Hizbollah do not benefit from peace, so it is in
their own interests and political survival to ensure that anarchy,
bloodshed, and misery perpetuates itself in the Palestinian
territories. Your nonsense does not fly with those who have spent time
in the middle east and actually know something about the situation,
Top-ass.
docremington
EconomicDemocracy Coop wrote:
> "The ordeal of the 1.5 million residents of Gaza affected by the
> Israeli blockade, over half of whom are children, has been allowed to
> continue without any formal objection by governments and at the UN."
>
Drivel. Monthly salaries of about 130,000 government palsimians total
$21 mln., exceeding the annual food budget of the zambian refugee
camps by a factor of 2 and are paid by international donors. The UNRWA
is concerned with its continuous employment too. Why would they both
jeopardize the income they rake in through their open-air
international welfare scam?
Topaz
<stan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>As to be expected, our resident Nazi and anti-semite chimes in to
>portray the poor widdle Pallies as "victims".
As to be expected our resident Jew chimes in to portray the Jews as
decent human beings.
>The fact of the matter
>is that it is Hamaz, Hizbollah, and other other terrorist/militant/
>fruitcake groups in the Palestinian terroritories that kill children.
By Stuart Littlewood
31 December 2008
Stuart Littlewood shows how Israel's public relations strategy frames
and defines the situation in Israel's own terms regardless of the
truth and, using advanced propaganda skills and the elaborate Israel
lobby network, it seeks to persuade Western politicians and media to
accept Israel's version of events.
While the murderous assault on Gaza continues, I notice there's a
briefing document on the website of the Israeli Embassy in London
which has a lie in every line. The West's mainstream media repeat
them, and even the most senior TV and radio interviewers don't bother
to challenge them.
The document is a transcript of Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni's
statement to the Israeli press dated 27 December 2008 - a day that
will live in infamy. It is a perfect example of the falsehoods used to
dupe not only us Westerners but Israel's own people. The statement
shows how the regime's view of itself is constructed on a web of
dishonesty and self-delusion.
For example:
* "Israeli citizens have been under the threat of daily attack from
Gaza for years."
Palestinians have been under harsh Israeli occupation for 60 years.
* "Only this week hundreds of missiles and mortars shells were fired
at Israeli civilian communities."
Only one in 500 Qassam rockets causes a fatality. How many
thousands of Israeli bombs, missiles, rockets, grenades and
tank-shells have been blasted into the crowded city and towns of the
Gaza Strip by Israel's high-tech weaponry??
* "Until now we have shown restraint. But today there is no other
option than a military operation."
The only legitimate option for Israel is to end the occupation
and withdraw behind its 1967 border, as required under international
law and UN resolutions. Israel has been killing Palestinians at the
rate of 8 to 1 since 2000, and children at the rate of nearly 12 to 1
(B'Tselem figures). This is somebody's idea of restraint?
* "We need to protect our citizens from attack through a military
response against the terror infrastructure in Gaza."
Self-defence is not a right exclusive to Israel. Palestinians
have an equal right to protect their citizens from the terror tactics
of Israel.
* "Israel left Gaza in order to create an opportunity for peace."
Israel never left Gaza. It still occupies Gaza's airspace and
coastal waters and controls all entrances and exits.
* "In return, the Hamas terror organization took control of Gaza
and is using its citizens as cover while it deliberately targets
Israeli communities and denies any chance for peace."
Hamas was voted into power as the legitimate government of
Palestine. Israel chose not to accept the people's choice, which
amounted to a denial of their human rights, and immediately set about
obliterating it.
* "We have tried everything to reach calm without using force. We
agreed to a truce through Egypt that was violated by Hamas, which
continued to target Israel, hold Gilad Shalit and build up its arms."
Try talking. The Israelis' ongoing siege and economic blockade,
begun shortly after Hamas was elected early in 2006, was never going
to generate calm. And why is Shalit considered more important than the
9,000 Palestinians abducted and held prisoner by Israel? As soon as a
Hamas government was formed Israeli troops arrested eight Hamas
ministers and 20 other parliamentarians, making the work of government
impossible.
* "Israel continues to act to prevent humanitarian crisis and to
minimize harm to Palestinian civilians."
Every agency operating in Gaza has warned of the deepening
humanitarian crisis and protested about the starvation and suffering,
especially of children many of whom show evidence of stunted growth.
* "The responsibility for harm to civilians lies with Hamas."
Not according to the Fourth Geneva Convention.
* "Hamas is a terrorist organization, supported by Iran, that
does not represent the legitimate national interests of the
Palestinian people but a radical Islamist agenda that seeks to deny
peace for the peoples of this region."
Hamas was the popular choice of Palestinians at the last
election. It is entitled under international law to take up arms
against an illegal occupier and invader. If it is supported by Iran,
so what? Israel receives mega-support from the US. When it comes to
terror, it is Israel's conduct which fits the US definition of
terrorism so perfectly
- see Bush's Executive Order 13224, Section 3.
* "While confronting Hamas, Israel continues to believe in the
two-state solution and remains committed to negotiations with the
legitimate Palestinian Authority in the context of the peace process,
launched at Annapolis."
Israel is busy establishing irreversible facts on the ground
that make a viable Palestinian state impossible. As everyone knows,
the regime has reneged on the peace process and carries on building
illegal settlements and the illegal Wall, and demolishing Palestinian
homes. Months ago Hamas accepted a Palestinian state based on
internationally recognized (pre-1967) borders, in accordance with UN
resolutions, with full sovereignty and its capital in Jerusalem, but
this has been ignored. Hamas also offered a 10-year truce, also
ignored. Earlier, Yasser Arafat and the Palestine Liberation
Organization recognized the State of Israel in the Oslo agreement but
what good did it do? Today's US-backed, Fatah-controlled Palestinian
Authority is not representative of the Palestinian people.
* "Israel expects the support and understanding of the
international community, as it confronts terror, and advances the
interest of all those who wish the forces of peace and co existence to
determine the agenda of this region."
Israel, next to the US, is the biggest purveyor of terror in the
region and only advances its own interests. It may get the support of
Israel lobby stooges in other Western governments but is rapidly
earning the contempt of everybody else.
From a statement dated 22 December 2008:
* "Hamas, backed by Iran, has regularly stated its desire to see
the complete destruction of Israel."
Israel is itself a leading destroyer and currently engaged in
trying to wipe out Hamas and the Gazans. Iran's President Ahmadinajad
quoted the late Ayatollah Khomeini as saying that "this regime
occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time" - fair comment
considering that Jerusalem, with Bethlehem, was designated an
"international city" under the UN Partition Plan. Israeli propaganda
twisted the Iranian's words to read "Israel must be wiped off the
map". Zionist sources and the manifestos of Israeli political parties
have made it clear for a long time that Israel plans to wipe Palestine
off the map, and every act and lie is directed towards that end.
* "Our fight is not with the people of Gaza; it is with the
extremists of Hamas."
Then why does the Israeli navy harass and fire on peaceable
Gazan fishermen who are well within their own territorial waters? Why
does Israel prevent Palestinian students from taking up places at
foreign universities and block hospital spares, medicines, foodstuffs
and foreign medics from entering Gaza? Why has the Israeli navy just
rammed a mercy vessel in international waters taking doctors and
medicines to Gaza? Latest air strikes have hit the Islamic University
and the Ministry of Education. These are direct attacks on Gazan civil
society and its infrastructure.
* "Hamas started this conflict, and it bears responsibility for
any harm to civilians on either side."
The conflict, started by Jewish terrorists, has been going on
for 60 years, decades before Hamas came into being.
* "Israel's only responsibility is to protect Israeli citizens."
As the occupying power Israel has a duty to see that the people
of the occupied territories come to no harm.
* "Just as Israel seeks to defend its civilian population, Hamas
seeks to kill them."
This reads far better the other way round: "Just as Hamas seeks
to defend its civilian population, Israel seeks to kill them."
* "Rocket attacks have continued for years and are now a daily
occurrence. How long does the international community expect Israel
will wait before defending itself against them?"
The rocket attacks will end when Israel ends the occupation and
stops terrorizing its neighbours.
* "In the south of Israel, Israeli citizens live with air raid
sirens sounding every day - sometimes every hour. Their situation is
intolerable."
Not half as intolerable as it is for the Gazans, who live in
constant fear of air raids and re-invasion and are constantly under
surveillance by armed drones which can fire missiles under computer
control from an armchair in Israeli headquarters.
* "For years, the international community has turned a blind eye
to this onslaught. Only when Israel seeks to stop the rockets do they
take notice."
For years the international community has turned a blind eye to
Israel's violations of international law and human rights, which is
why the problem remains unsolved.
* "Hamas is not only the enemy of Israel - it is the enemy of
every Palestinian who believes in peace."
Israelis just can't come to terms with the Palestinians'
democratic choice and are bent on obliterating it.
* "It is Hamas' attacks - not Israel's reactions - that destroy
every opportunity we have for peace."
The world has managed to work out by now that Israel doesn't
want peace until it has stolen all the land and water it needs to
expand its racist state into a "Greater Israel". It is well on the way
to achieving this and won't be thwarted.
* "Palestinian militants targeted by Israel are not just the
enemies of the Israeli people; they are criminals under international
law, and enemies of peace."
Israel is in no position to preach international law.
* "What is collective punishment? 'Collective punishment' is a
city - schools, hospitals, homes - civilians being bombarded every
single day by rockets and mortars."
Collective punishment is keeping a whole population bottled up
under siege and blocking supplies and exports, smashing their
infrastructure, wrecking their economy and starving their children.
Trying to equate Sderot with what's happening in the Gaza Strip is
idiotic.
* "Today's Middle East is divided between extremists and
pragmatists. Hamas, backed by Iran, belongs to the extremists, who
must be defeated for the sake of the future of the Middle East...
Israel's primary goal is peace."
Israel's primary goal is the expansion of Israel by making the
occupation of the West Bank permanent and bringing the Gazans to their
knees.
The core issue in this struggle is the illegality of Israel's brutal
occupation. Israel goes to great lengths to avoid and suppress all
mention of it and play-acts the pathetic victim. As the official
statements (above) show, the strategy is to frame and define the
situation in Israel's own terms regardless of the truth. It uses
advanced propaganda skills, and the elaborate Israel lobby network, to
persuade Western politicians and media to accept Israel's version of
events (and even use Israel's biased language) and not question its
motives.
In political public relations terms it works wonderfully well. The
loony leaders of my own government happily spread the poison and don't
seem interested in halting Israeli aggression and the vaporizing,
dismembering and crushing of Gaza's population. In human PR terms it
is a disaster.
I have been listening to the BBC's senior interviewers these last few
days. None has had the gumption to ask Israeli spokesmen the only
question that matters - the "killer" question on which hangs the key
to peace: WHEN IS ISRAEL GOING TO END ITS OCCUPATION AND RETURN TO THE
PALESTINIANS THEIR LANDS AND FREEDOM?
Stuart Littlewood is author of the book Radio Free Palestine, which
tells the plight of the Palestinians under occupation. For further
information please visit www.radiofreepalestine.co.uk
>Hamas and other Palestinian groups use homicide bombers (sometimes
>children themselves) to target Israeli civilians and children on
>school buses, in ice cream parlors, in day care centers and anywhere
>else they can MAXIMIZE the loss of innocent life.
"Witnesses watched as more than 60 Palestinian shops were bulldozed to
the ground this week in one West Bank village, while the owners stood
by and watch helplessly. But not one American in ten saw or heard
about this in the US press.
An educated American pro-life activist was surprised to disbelief
when I told him that the Israeli death losses run about one-fourth the
number or Palestinians killed by Israelis. He thought the statistics
were reversed, having never heard or seen a count in the US press, he
has been brain scrubbed. Misinformation by the US press is not
excusable in the Internet age. So Israel has provided an Orwellian
propaganda filter called the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs
(IMFA) that makes it all possible. It provides the convenient excuse
the US press needs to look the other way and print abridged stories,
keeping most of us ignorant.
The propaganda arm of the Israeli military has once again been caught
purposefully lying about the death count among its forces. We believe
their purpose in doing this is to condition Americans into accepting
Israel's use of American-made weapons of mass destruction against the
vulnerable civilian population in Gaza and the West Bank. Israel's
willing facilitator is the US Media, which spreads their distorted
stories in the USA. This same pattern of misrepresentation is repeated
again and again, proving how important and routine propaganda is to
Israel.
On December 5th, the IMFA released an account of two suspected
sacrifice bombers (wrongly called suicide bombers*) who allegedly
killed 22 persons and wounded more than 100. But the press release
failed to mention that there were also Israeli military casualties in
the raid. Furthermore, their account omitted the fact that a female
army sergeant was among the killed. The omission is significant. It
fits perfectly into the predictable pattern of how the IMFA deceives
Americans almost daily. This practice repeatedly uses almost every
report of Israeli deaths to distort the facts of their conflict with
the Palestinians. We will now teach you how to read between the lies
and know when the story is distorted.
THE PATTERN OF DECEPTION
On November 19, 2002, the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs (IMFA)
re-manufactured a similar story about a Palestinian sacrifice raid on
a military target. Twelve Israeli soldiers and paramilitary fighting
men were killed and there was no collateral damage (civilians dead).
The propagandists changed the "facts" to call the raid a "Massacre of
innocent (Israeli) civilians," as the story was carried in the US
press. It is a total and complete bald-faced lie, which We Hold These
Truths alone corrected it in our article: U. S. Media, Caught Lying...
Again http://www.whtt.org/articles/021224.htm
This writer put the facts together from the Israeli military's own
documents one month after the event was misreported. Do you, dear
reader, know how to recognize such lies for yourself so you don't have
to wait for us to unravel it for you? To do this one must first
understand the quaint language of the IMFA. We call these lies
"z-facts" (short for Zionist facts) meaning lies that are couched in
official, narrative sounding language but are indeed untrue. Here is
how the Hebron report was distorted by z- facts, which the Media
reported as rear facts. The first release from the IMFA read:
"THE TERROR ATTACK IN HEBRON CLAIMED 12 LIVES." and "PALESTINIAN
GUNMEN" had opened fire on "JEWISH WORSHIPPERS WALKING HOME FROM
RELIGIOUS SERVICES,"
Z-facts differ from bald-faced lies because they do not state outright
all the killed or wounded are civilians, but it is clearly implied.
(In those rare cases where everyone killed are indeed civilian, the
IMFA says so and saves its lies for a later day.) The truth is told
only if it suits the teller. By calling an attack on an armed military
unit a "terror attack" on "Jewish worshipers" and "claiming 12 lives,"
the z-facts leave the a clear impression that those killed were
civilians. Any honest account would have called it "an attack on
Israeli military unit by Palestinian guerillas" etc. In our previous
article we explained the procedure as follows: "The Israeli Ministry
of Foreign Affairs is a propaganda arm of the Israeli Defense Force
(IDF).-They are the first to know who is killed. But they cause the
story to be circulated that all killed were civilians because it
serves their purpose. Then, once the misinformation has reached the
American public, the corrected story is allowed to surface in Israel,
though the false images are never corrected in the eyes of the
American public." http://www.whtt.org/articles/021224.htm (please
forgive us for quoting ourselves, but we are the best source)
In January 5th story Israel did it again. This time every one of our
readers should have detected the lie without being told. The press in
both countries used the same predictable, deceptive language. Each
stated "22 Israelis" had been killed and many more wounded. Had all
those killed or wounded had been non-military the report would most
likely have called them "civilians." The generic term "Israelis"
suggest to us that the IMFA is hiding something, not wanting to
identify who was really killed. They were.
Later the same day, a sad corrected story was carried with the names
of those killed. The IMFA stated that all of the victims had been
identified and included Staff Sgt. Mazal Orkobi of Azor. Ha'aretz
subsequently revealed in an obituary that Sgt. Orkobi was a 20
year-old female who was on her first day of active duty with the
Israeli Defense Forces. But this part of the story never reached the
USA. Nor can we find a disclosure as to how many of the 120 wounded
were military. As usual, the IMFA did not disclose those who were in
the active reserves but not on duty at the time of death...
But because military were killed and possibly wounded, no one can
conclude they targeted civilians. In all but a few sacrifice bombings
military are killed or wounded. The IMFA had two reasons for keeping
Sergeant Orkobi's name out of the print. They can garner sympathy for
their air raids if the American public believes the sacrifice bombers
are targeting civilians only. Israel kills Palestinian civilians by
the dozens and do not even bother to apologize.
The second reason Israel keeps Sergeant Orkobi's name out of
American's minds is that most do not know that Israeli's draft their
girls and puts them in harms way. If American Christians knew about
the mistreatment of Israeli women, including the use of Military-paid
abortion as a birth control method, many would wonder about their
unquestioned support of the Israeli war machine.
Christian Israeli Patriots such as Pat Robertson, Franklin Graham and
Jerry Falwell, who Ariel Sharon calls the Christian Zionists, might be
embarrassed to explain their undying devotion to a regime which drafts
women into combat, marches them hip to hip with men, and provides free
abortions for the resulting problems. Some might wake up and actually
wonder if boys and girls are conditioned to kill and torture
Palestinian including children. Israel and a complicit US Media solve
these twin problems by doctoring press releases with false statements
that omit the loss of military personnel in guerilla raids. Female
names are never associated with the military even though they make up
about 1/3 of the total draftees.
("Suicide bomber:" Suicide is the act of taking ones one life for the
purpose of ending it. Sacrifice bombers have never been shown to have
a desire to stop living; their motive is to find and destroy enemy
personal regardless of the cost. Thus the term "sacrifice bombers" is
more accurate in describing them. The former is an Israeli propaganda
label.)
We Hold These Truths (http://www.whtt.org)
P.O. Box 14491 Scottsdale, AZ
85267 480-947-3329
> In addition, Hamas
>is responsible for the death of PALESTINIAN children by setting up
>mortar and rocket launchers in schools, hospitals, apartment buildings
>and other buildings and facilities in civilian neighborhoods, in
>direct violation of the Geneva Convention. In effect it is Hamas who
>is killing Palestinian children as part of a deliberate policy of
>maximizing Palestinian casualties and inflaming the Arab world.
>
>The fact of the matter is that an unholy alliance of Lefty Liberal goo-
>goos and neo-Nazi thugs deliberately distorts the Palestinian
>conflict.
An Israeli Bulldozer killed an American student, Rachel Corrie, trying
to stop the destruction of Palestinian homes.
Excerpts from an e-mail from Rachel Corrie to her family on
February 7, 2003 from the Gaza Strip.
I have been in Palestine for two weeks and one hour now, and I
still have very few words to describe what I see. It is most difficult
for me to think about what's going on here when I sit down to write
back to the United States--something about the virtual portal into
luxury. I don't know if many of the children here have ever existed
without tank-shell holes in their walls and the towers of an occupying
army surveying them constantly from the near horizons. I think,
although I'm not entirely sure, that even the smallest of these
children understand that life is not like this everywhere. An
eight-year-old was shot and killed by an Israeli tank two days before
I got here, and many of the children murmur his name to me, Ali--or
point at the posters of him on the walls.
The children also love to get me to practice my limited Arabic by
asking me "Kaif Sharon?" "Kaif Bush?" and they laugh when I say "Bush
Majnoon" "Sharon Majnoon" back in my limited Arabic. (How is Sharon?
How is Bush? Bush is crazy. Sharon is crazy.) Of course this isn't
quite what I believe, and some of the adults who have the English
correct me: Bush mish Majnoon... Bush is a businessman. Today I tried
to learn to say "Bush is a tool", but I don't think it translated
quite right. But anyway, there are eight-year- olds here much more
aware of the workings of the global power structure than I was just a
few years ago--at least regarding Israel.
Nevertheless, I think about the fact that no amount of reading,
attendance at conferences, documentary viewing and word of
mouth could have prepared me for the reality of the situation here.
You just can't imagine it unless you see it, and even then you are
always well aware that your experience is not at all the reality: what
with the difficulties the Israeli Army would face if they shot an
unarmed US citizen, and with the fact that I have money to buy water
when the army destroys wells, and, of course, the fact that I have the
option of leaving. Nobody in my family has been shot, driving in their
car, by a rocket launcher from a tower at the end of a major street in
my hometown. I have a home. I am allowed to go see the ocean.
Ostensibly it is still quite difficult for me to be held for months or
years on end without a trial (this because I am a white US citizen, as
opposed to so many others). When I leave for school or work I can be
relatively certain that there will not be a heavily armed soldier
waiting half way between Mud Bay and downtown Olympia at a
checkpoint?a soldier with the power to decide whether I can go about
my business, and whether I can get home again when I'm done. So, if I
feel outrage at arriving and entering briefly and incompletely into
the world in, I wonder conversely about how it would be for them to
arrive in my world.
They know that children in the United States don't usually have their
parents shot and they know they sometimes get to see the ocean.
But once you have seen the ocean and lived in a silent place, where
water is taken for granted and not stolen in the night by bulldozers,
and once you have spent an evening when you haven't wondered if
the walls of your home might suddenly fall inward waking you from
your sleep, and once you've met people who have never lost anyone--
once you have experienced the reality of a world that isn't surrounded
by murderous towers, tanks, armed "settlements" and now a giant
metal wall, I wonder if you can forgive the world for all the years of
your childhood spent existing--just existing--in resistance to the
constant stranglehold of the world's fourth largest military--backed
by the world's only superpower--in it's attempt to erase you from your
home. That is something I wonder about these children. I wonder
what would happen if they really knew.
As an afterthought to all this rambling, I am in Rafah, a city of
about 140,000 people, approximately 60 percent of whom are refugees--
many of whom are twice or three times refugees. Rafah existed prior
to 1948, but most of the people here are themselves or are descendants
of people who were relocated here from their homes in historic
Palestine--now Israel. Rafah was split in half when the Sinai returned
to Egypt. Currently, the Israeli army is building a
fourteen-meter-high wall between Rafah in Palestine and the border,
carving a no-mans land from the houses along the border. Six hundred
and two homes have been completely bulldozed according to the Rafah
Popular Refugee Committee. The number of homes that have been
partially destroyed is greater.
Today as I walked on top of the rubble where homes once stood,
Egyptian soldiers called to me from the other side of the border,
"Go! Go!" because a tank was coming. Followed by waving and
"what's your name?". There is something disturbing about this
friendly curiosity. It reminded me of how much, to some degree, we
are all kids curious about other kids: Egyptian kids shouting at
strange women wandering into the path of tanks. Palestinian kids shot
from the tanks when they peak out from behind walls to see what's
going on. International kids standing in front of tanks with banners.
Israeli kids in the tanks anonymously, occasionally shouting-- and
also occasionally waving--many forced to be here, many just
aggressive, shooting into the houses as we wander away.
In addition to the constant presence of tanks along the border and
in the western region between Rafah and settlements along the coast,
there are more IDF towers here than I can count--along the horizon,at
the end of streets. Some just army green metal. Others these strange
spiral staircases draped in some kind of netting to make the activity
within anonymous. Some hidden,just beneath the horizon of buildings.
A new one went up the other day in the time it took us to do laundry
and to cross town twice to hang banners. Despite the fact that some of
the areas nearest the border are the original Rafah with families who
have lived on this land for at least a century, only the 1948 camps in
the center of the city are Palestinian controlled areas under Oslo.
But as far as I can tell, there are few if any places that are not
within the sights of some tower or another. Certainly there is no
place invulnerable to apache helicopters or to the cameras of
invisible drones we hear buzzing over the city for hours at a time.
I've been having trouble accessing news about the outside world here,
but I hear an escalation of war on Iraq is inevitable. There is a
great deal of concern here about the "reoccupation of Gaza." Gaza is
reoccupied every day to various extents, but I think the fear is that
the tanks will enter all the streets and remain here, instead of
entering some of the streets and then withdrawing after some hours or
days to observe and shoot from the edges of the communities. If people
aren't already thinking about the consequences of this war for the
people of the entire region then I hope they will start.
I also hope you'll come here. We've been wavering between five
and six internationals. The neighborhoods that have asked us for
some form of presence are Yibna, Tel El Sultan, Hi Salam, Brazil,
Block J, Zorob, and Block O. There is also need for constant night-
time presence at a well on the outskirts of Rafah since the Israeli
army destroyed the two largest wells. According to the municipal
water office the wells destroyed last week provided half of Rafah's
water supply. Many of the communities have requested internationals
to be present at night to attempt to shield houses from further
demolition. After about ten p.m. it is very difficult to move at night
because the Israeli army treats anyone in the streets as resistance
and shoots at them. So clearly we are too few.
I continue to believe that my home, Olympia, could gain a lot and
offer a lot by deciding to make a commitment to Rafah in the form of a
sister-community relationship. Some teachers and children's groups
have expressed interest in e-mail exchanges, but this is only the tip
of the iceberg of solidarity work that might be done. Many people want
their voices to be heard, and I think we need to use some of our
privilege as internationals to get those voices heard directly in the
US, rather than through the filter of well-meaning internationals such
as myself. I am just beginning to learn, from what I expect to be a
very intense tutelage, about the ability of people to organize against
all odds, and to resist against all odds.
Thanks for the news I've been getting from friends in the US. I just
read a report back from a friend who organized a peace group in
Shelton, Washington, and was able to be part of a delegation to the
large January 18th protest in Washington DC. People here watch the
media, and they told me again today that there have been large
protests in the United States and "problems for the government" in the
UK. So thanks for allowing me to not feel like a complete polyanna
when I tentatively tell people here that many people in the United
States do not support the policies of our government, and that we are
learning from global examples how to resist.
>There is no distinct ethnic "Palestinian" identity nor was
>there ever an organic Palestinian national movement. The
>"Palestinian" people (i.e. the occupants of the West Bank and the
>Gaza Strip) merely serve as cannon fodder as part of the ongoing proxy
>war against Israel by the Arab states.
"After the Second World War, shortly before the United Nations
partition of Palestine into separate Jewish and non-Jewish areas, Jews
still made up less than one-third of the population of Palestine. The
1946 British census counted 608,000 Jews out of a total population of
1,845,000. The great majority of these Jews were recent immigrants,
whereas nearly all of the Arabs were natives who had roots in
Palestine going back many generations. What the Jews had that the
Palestinians didn't have, however, was a very substantial degree of
control of the governments of the United States and the United
Kingdom, and these two countries exerted a decisive influence on the
policies of the United Nations.
The result of this influence was the partition of Palestine in 1948
into separate Jewish and non-Jewish areas, with the one-third of the
population that was Jewish being awarded two-thirds of the land,
including the most valuable areas.
The Jews immediately set about ethnically cleansing their areas,
carrying out a number of horrifying massacres of non-Jewish
Palestinians and terrorizing tens of thousands of others into fleeing
from their homes, which immediately were seized and occupied by the
Jews. In a series of wars since 1948, the Jews, backed by the United
States, seized even more Palestinian land. The Palestinians who were
driven from their land-the real Palestinians, whose parents and
grandparents and great-grandparents had owned the land-were forced
into crowded and dirty refugee camps, where they still live. And
whenever one of these dispossessed Palestinians strikes back at the
Jews who stole his country from him, everyone in the Bush government,
from the chief liar on down, and everyone in the controlled media here
denounces the Palestinian as a "terrorist"-and all of the Sally
Soccermoms and Joe Sixpacks nod in agreement.
I'll tell you about one of these Palestinian "terrorists" you've
certainly heard mentioned by the media if you pay any attention at all
to what's happening in the world. He's called Abu Nidal: the most
feared Palestinian "terrorist" of them all. The name the man called
Abu Nidal was born with is Sabri al-Banna. He was born in 1937 in the
Palestinian coastal city of Jaffa. His family was one of the
wealthiest and most distinguished families in Palestine and owned,
among other things, more than 6,000 acres of orange orchards, which
were the major source of income for the family. When Sabri al-Banna
was an 11-year-old schoolboy, the Jews seized all of his family's
orchards and other lands, all of their houses, and everything else his
family owned, and he and his family ended up living in a tent in a
refugee camp in the Gaza strip. Quite a shock for a quiet,
introverted little boy.
The shock led him to dedicate his life to evening the score, to
gaining justice for his people, to striking back at the Jews who had
stolen all of his family's property and driven them into a refugee
camp. He built what was probably the most highly disciplined and
ruthless fighting organization on the Palestinian side. He struck not
only at Jews but also at Palestinians who collaborated or compromised
with the Jews. Whenever Abu Nidal's troops would strike,
machine-gunning Israeli tourists at an airport or bombing some Jewish
facility in another country, the politicians and the media here always
would go into hysterics about Arab "terrorism." I always cheered. Abu
Nidal is not some crazed murderer who likes to kill people. He is a
Palestinian patriot fighting for his people and for his country in the
only way he can fight under the circumstances. He does not "hate
America's freedom" as George Bush and the media would have you
believe. There is no reason for him to be an enemy of America, except
that we have made him an enemy by arming and financing the Jews who
stole his family's orange groves and forced him into a refugee camp.
Remember that whenever you buy an orange that came into America from
Israel: one of those sweet Jaffa oranges that are so favored by New
York Jews. That orange is stolen property. It belongs to Abu Nidal. It
was stolen from him by the Jew who sold it to you."
>The fact that the citizens of
>the Gaza Strip have freely voted a known terrorist organization to be
>their elected representatives doesn't help the situation either.
>Groups like Hamas and Hizbollah do not benefit from peace, so it is in
>their own interests and political survival to ensure that anarchy,
>bloodshed, and misery perpetuates itself in the Palestinian
>territories. Your nonsense does not fly with those who have spent time
>in the middle east and actually know something about the situation,
>Top-ass.
One Man's Terrorist...
"Perception is all - or almost all. Perception can be shaped and
moulded by the conditioning of the mass media, which unkind folk might
prefer to call 'brainwashing'. We, playing follow my leader to the
Americans, are now part of what is termed a 'War against Terror'.
Whilst involved in this war we can afford to send forth large convoys
of vehicles to some desert, at the same time as NHS dentistry crumbles
at home, and water bills rise to extortionate levels. If these trends
continue, maybe we can look forward to seeing an �lite of Mandelson
clones in smart suits lording it over grubby, toothless proles!
But this not the first 'War on Terror'. Sixty years ago Germany and
the other Axis powers were convinced that they were fighting a war
against terror.
The French Resistance were termed terrorists: even RAF Bomber Command
were referred to as the terrorflieger. The Soviet partisans were seen
as terrorists who had slain several hundred thousand German soldiers.
Looming over all this was the perceived Judaic role in Communism which
had almost annihilated the old, predominately Germanic ruling �lite in
Russia. According to Alexander Solzhenitsyn, the chief concentration
camp boss supervising this slaughter was Naftaly Frenkel, a Turkish
Jew.
Indeed the association of certain highly-placed Jews with Communism
wasn't just a perception of the Germans, but a reality noted by many
different commentators. A novel such as John Buchan's Thirty Nine
Steps used that fact as a plot background. Eric Hobsbawm recorded in
one of his histories that the small Egyptian communist party had an
almost wholly Jewish membership. Writing in the 50s, Daily Telegraph
Foreign Correspondent Lovat F. Edwards commented that Communism had
very little appeal to Arabs because they were inclined to equate it
with 'Judaisation'.
Today the US r�gime goes to war, and justifies slaughter and
destruction on massive scale by a perceived 'offence', but are their
reasons perhaps less convincing than those of the Germans? I have
written myself on the many anomalies surrounding the September 11th
attacks (see Spearhead No. 423). From the five dancing Israelis
filming the collapsing Twin Towers, to a crashing aircraft at the
Pentagon that leaves no debris or lawn damage, almost nothing makes
sense if we follow the official story. Indeed, the most wacky
conspiracy theory of all now seems to be that it was all planned and
perpetrated by a man with a beard and turban stuck in a fortified
Afghan cave.
No top Americans killed
Then again, while Germans such as Ernst von Rath and Wilhelm Gustloff
fell to the bullets of 'Jewish extremist' terrorists, no American
politicians or officials have been shot down by 'Islamic extremist'
gunmen from the possibly semi-mythic Al Qaeda. We are also expected to
surrender our ancient liberties in favour of ID cards and iris scans,
when Al Qaeda has caused no injuries or damage in this country
whatever. This is in stark contrast to the IRA or even the Irgun, who
blew up Rex Farran and injured three postmen in Britain during 1946.
Beyond this, there are no connections between Al Qaeda and Iraq, and
never were outside the fevered minds of Perle and Co. In fact,
recommended reading for everyone should be: 'How the US helped to
create a monster' by John Clarke, which appeared a few years ago in
the Irish Examiner.1
Yet this flimsy excuse has been used to wreak a trail of havoc and
destruction. At Fallujah, US forces have bombed hospitals, cut off
water supplies to civilians, and used napalm bombs. Like their Israeli
twins, snipers have targeted not only insurgents, but also old men,
women and children. Seventeen doctors and nurses were even gunned down
as they attempted to cross the Euphrates to aid the wounded. Civilians
have been shot as they attempted to wave white sheets to surrender.
The entire countryside has been poisoned by depleted uranium shells.
Germans were hung or imprisoned after World War II, often for doing
much, much less than has been perpetrated in Iraq over the past year
or two.
But the neocon journalist Ralph Peters, writing in the New York Post
took a sanguine view of the Fallujah slaughter, saying that:
'We don't need more complaints about our treatment of prisoners from
the global forces of appeasement. We need terrorists dead in the dust.
And the world needs to see their corpses...
'Even if Fallujah has to go the way of Carthage, reduced to shards,
the price will be worth it. We need to demonstrate our strength of
will to the world, to show that there is only one possible result when
madmen take on America.'
Incidentally, I've read through quite a number of articles in the
German wartime magazine Signal and never managed to find anything
remotely as bloodthirsty as this NYP piece. Has the USA reverted back
to the thinking behind the Book of Joshua and the injunction to
"destroy everything that breathes?"
What's happened in Iraq since the fall of Saddam has been simply
disgusting - more or less the murder of an entire society.
The man responsible
The article 'Apocalypse Now?'2 by Jonathan Mark, published in The
Jewish Week, had some remarkable things to say about the man with
ultimate responsibility for prosecuting the so-called 'War against
Terror'. Although - at times - coming over a lot like an
'anti-Semitic' parody, the essay was worthy of note for revealing the
thinking of some leading lights of the Lubavitch movement. Before
reading the quote, it should be explained that the word 'Ishmael'
symbolises the Arab and Muslim peoples, just as 'Esau' indicates
Christians and Europeans. It goes:
'"We usually think our ultimate enemy is Esau," says Rabbi Butman of
the metaphorical representative of Christianity. "Here, we see it is
Ishmael. Esau - the president and the Christian right - support us and
Ishmael is the culprit we're going to break now."
'Jewish religious conservatives aren't nervous, they're delighted.
Radio talk show host, Dennis Prager, writing for Jewish World Review,
an Orthodox online magazine, says, "To the extent that one is ever
able to see the hand of God in history... I believe that either divine
intervention or good luck on the magnitude of a lottery win explains
George W. Bush's rise to the position of president." Bush is
"remarkable," Rabbi Fund tells The Jewish Week, "the ultimate Shabbos
Goy."'3
There you have it: the "ultimate Shabbos Goy" has presided over a
holocaust of some 100,000 Iraqis, plus over 1,000 of his own troops.
Yet, finally it all comes down, as it usually does, to money, power
and (dis)information. The BBC or NBC will never reveal the truth, so
the misinformed and easily deceived can still go on believing in a
nice clean 'War against Terror', against all those evil men who hate
our freedoms blah blah... There could be endless TV documentaries on
the expulsion of the Palestinians, or memorials and museums of the
Iraqi Holocaust, but there are none.
It is also just a matter of perception: the perception of what is a
'War against Terror,' and what is a 'Holocaust.'
1. http://archives.tcm.ie/irishexaminer/2001/09/18/story12972.asp
2. http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/newscontent.php3?artid=7577
3. A Shabbos Goy being, like Bush or Blair, a Gentile politician who
aids Zionist interests."
Ian Buckley
Spearhead Online
Dave Heil
> How To Explain American Apathy Over Israeli Killings of Palestinian
> Children?
>
> By Stephen J. Sosebee
>
> Nothing has deepened the collective despair that is life in
> Palestine today more than the killing of children, nor has any one
> dimension produced greater anger and fuel for the intifada. Though it
> may be so common now that it is hardly noticed in Israel, every
> injured or dead child is mourned by the 1.7 million Palestinians
> resisting occupation.
I have an easy answer for your friend, Toupee. Have the Palestinians
stop killing Israeli children.
There is a Palestinian state. It is called The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan.
John Q Public
I say stop all aid, when the idiots get hungry enough they can take it
out on the root cause, their own fucked up leadership!
Topaz
wrote:
>I have an easy answer for your friend, Toupee. Have the Palestinians
>stop killing Israeli children.
On Wednesday, March 6th, Ha'aretz, the prominent Israeli newspaper,
reported that "15 people" were killed the previous afternoon in
a "suicide" bus bombing in Haifa. The names of the killed and wounded
were not disclosed for more than 24 hours, but personal details about
the bomber were released immediately. According to Ha'aretz he
was "Mahmoud Amadan Salim Kawasme, 20, a computer student from Hebron
Polytechnic Institute. A letter was found on his body that included
quotations from the Koran. Kawasme is the 20th student from this
college to carry out attacks against Israeli targets since the
beginning of the Intifada."(2)
Most readers worldwide were told only a half-truth, that the bomber
was a 20 year-old Arab Muslim who deliberately murders innocent
civilians. George W. Bush poured glue on the lie by condemning the
act as "terrorism against the innocent." We want to assume our
President tells the whole truth, but he did not.
THE TRUTH COMES OUT OVERNIGHT:
The MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS standard practice is to wait for the
glue holding the lie together to set before bleeding out the names
and ranks of those killed, that way most people never know if
military are among those killed.
It was later announce that at least two of those killed were IDF
(Israeli Army) active duty personnel. Another may have been in the
military or the reserves. Unfortunately there were civilian
casualties, but the bombing must be viewed as aimed at Army
personnel. Why? Because it must be assumed that the soldiers hit
were the targets picked. This is the nature of war. Those near
soldiers are at risk.
In the first 65 days of 2003, Israel's military has killed no less
then 150 Palestinians, almost every one a civilians, and most were
killed inside their own homes. About half of those killed were
children.
In the entire history of the 12-year Intifada, approximately 66
Israelis children (under military age) have been killed by all
Palestinian attacks, including this Haifa bus #37 in which eight
teenagers were killed. This figure is compiled by examining public
records provided by the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Israel's military has killed more Palestinian children in just the
last TWO MONTHS than the Palestinian have killed in 10 years! Who
then are the child killers?
Five of the eight teenagers killed in the explosion were within one
year of military age, which is 18 in Israel, and most were only three
or four years younger than the bomber. These students eventually
must all serve in the Israeli army.
One can only wonder how many of those 50 who were reported wounded
may also be active duty military, or are in the huge reserve forces.
The Palestinian attack on Haifa bus #37 was no more or less than a
search and destroy mission carried out by a volunteer militia against
and illegally oppressor. In some bus bombings 75% or more of those
killed were military. Yes, there was significant "collateral
damage." But our leaders make no apology for the civilian deaths will
that will come in Iraq.
The loss of any life is always tragic. Israelis are human, and so
are the Palestinians. WHTT is a pro-life organization. We also
grieve for the family of the 20 year old who blew himself up in this
mission against those military persons whom he considered his
oppressors.
By now the Israeli Defense Force will probably have found Mohamoud's
family and destroyed their home, and perhaps their neighbors' homes,
perhaps killing many more. Within 24 hour of this Mohamoud's mission
the IDF had killed 10 Gaza residents and wounded more than a hundred,
many of who will probably not survive, in an Apache Helicopter rocket
attack into upon a street crowd of civilians in Gaza. Mahmoud was
not from Gaza.
Where do you place the blame for this violence? When our president
labeled Mahmoud a terrorist he placed a target on the student's
family, and on anyone upon whom the Israelis chose to take
retribution. A little lie brings big death; why can't our leader
tell the truth about the little details?
Endnotes:
(1)Haaretz death report:
(<http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml>?
itemNo=269940&contrassID=1&subContrassID=5&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y
)
(2.) <http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/spages/269513.html>
Haaretz reported the following military persons killed on the bus #37
"Barry Oved, 21, from Rosh Pina .... Barry was to have been RELEASED
FROM THE ARMY IN ABOUT FIVE MONTHS.... He will be laid to rest at 4
P.M. on Thursday at the MILITARY SECTION of the Rosh Pina cemetery."
(Note the admission of his military service, but his rank is not
given. If one did not read carefully he could be taken for a
civilian.)
"Mitel Katav, 20, from Haifa... WAS RELEASED FROM MILITARY SERVICE
just over a month ago... Her uncle, Karmi Katav, said 'she was a
sweet and smiling child".... He added that Mitel's father had five
children and would get up at 5:30 A.M. TO TAKE HER TO THE BUS STATION
ON HER WAY TO THE ARMY BASE."
"Staff Sergeant Eliahu Lacham, 22, from Haifa"
"ELIAHU LACHAM WILL BE LAID TO REST AT 9 P.M. ON THURSDAY AT MILITARY
CEMETERY IN HAIFA."
[The release does not disclose the names of wounded, nor if Mitel or
others on the bus are in the active military reserve, as are most
Israelis over 21 years old, but it does reveal that the military
travel on public buses in Israel. Editor observed this to be fact on
every bus he saw or rode. There can be doubt that public buses in
Israel are military targets. Mitel was female soldier, a facts is
rarely admitted to Americans when Israelis are killed.]
WHTT has produced several first hand reports proving why buses are
military targets in Israel and why the press has lied about it. See
LIAR, LIAR! THE ISRAELI MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS by
C. E. Carlson (<http://www.whtt.org/articles/020621.htm>)
>
>There is a Palestinian state. It is called The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan.
Tiptoeing around Our Problems
By Dr. William Pierce
"We've been talking about the very dangerous situation in the Middle
East recently, just because so much is happening there, and
undoubtedly we'll be talking about it much more in the future. For
that reason I want to make very clear what my motives and sympathies
are, lest I lead anyone astray and be thought a hypocrite for doing
so. First, regarding Palestine: although my sympathies definitely lie
with the Palestinians rather than with the Jews, it is not horror at
what the Jews are doing to the Palestinians that motivates me. What
motivates me is horror that my country is being used by the Jews in
their war against the Palestinians. If America were not involved at
all in the Middle East I still would sympathize with the Palestinians
and I would wish that they could be successful in driving the Jews
into the sea and annihilating the abomination that is Israel, but that
conflict between Jews and Palestinians would not be a major concern
for me. At least, my
concern there would be dwarfed by my concern for problems more
directly involving my own people in America and in Europe and in
southern Africa.
Even now, with money and weapons being supplied by America and used to
slaughter Palestinians, my concern is much less with monsters like
Ariel Sharon who are doing the slaughtering than it is with the filthy
creatures among my own people in America who are collaborating with
Jews here to keep the weapons and money flowing to Sharon -- and are
ready to do whatever else the Jews require of them here or abroad.
So when I tell you about Jews in occupied Palestine shooting
Palestinian children, and disapproval and anger are evident in my
voice, what I really am angry about is that the American people, my
people, are being used for this murderous activity. I am angry that
America's whole foreign policy has been perverted to serve Jewish
interests at the expense of American interests. I am angry that
America's political system has been perverted to ensure that we always
have so-called "leaders," whether Democrat or Republican, who are
dependent on the Jewish media or Jewish money or both for their
election and consequently will do the bidding of the Jews. I am angry
that our whole government is riddled with Jews -- Jews in our Defense
Department, Jews in our State
Department, Jews in our Immigration and Naturalization Service, Jews
in our Justice Department, Jews in the President's speech-writing
staff - who really set the policies of our government behind the
scenes, while the politicians are out front in the spotlight making
speeches and kissing babies - and doing as they're told by the Jews
behind the
scenes.
Did you know that it was a Jewish speechwriter, David Frum, who put
the phrase "axis of evil" in George Bush's mouth to justify America's
ongoing war against Israel's enemies? Did you know that a clique of
Jews in the Defense Department and among George Bush's foreign policy
advisers are the people actually running the so-called "war on terror"
in Afghanistan: a war that they intend to expand to Iraq and any other
Middle Eastern country that gets uppity, in order to make that part of
the world safe for Israel at American expense? Secretary of Defense
Donald Rumsfeld is a front man for his nominal subordinates, Deputy
Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz and Deputy Undersecretary of
Defense for Policy Douglas Feith; and George Bush's official foreign
policy adviser, Condoleezza Rice, helps him meet his Black quota for
the Cabinet, but it is the Jew Richard Perle, chairman of Bush's
Defense Policy Board, who gives him his foreign policy directives.
As I've said on more than one occasion, George Bush is a feckless
nincompoop who couldn't come up with a defense policy or a foreign
policy on his own if he had to -- which is why he's President. The
real policymakers behind the scenes certainly don't want a man in the
White House who has ideas of his own, because those ideas might
conflict with theirs.
And it is nothing but empty sophistry to make a distinction between
Jews in Israel, such as Ariel Sharon and Simon Peres, and the Jews in
Mr. Bush's administration formulating his policies or the Jews
controlling our mass media. They all are Jews, and that's what really
matters.
There are many knowledgeable Americans besides me who think that it's
not a good thing to have Jews using America to advance Israel's
interests at the expense of America's interests. They know how the
system works: how the Jews exert their control through money and media
and a well-entrenched network of Jewish operatives, such as Wolfowitz
and Feith and Perle. And many of these knowledgeable Americans also
understand how Jewish subterfuge and deceit work: they understand that
the Jews throw up a lot of smoke to conceal their control and make it
appear that they have much less influence than they actually do.
Despite this degree of understanding that many knowledgeable Americans
have, there seem to be very few who are willing or able to draw the
necessary conclusions. What I keep seeing are comments about the need
to get the so-called "peace process" going again in the Middle East,
and how there are hardline supporters of Israel who are obstructing
the "peace process" because they think that it will give too much to
the Palestinians or will compromise Israel's security, or whatever.
These knowledgeable Americans seem to believe that if we could just
get around the Jewish hardliners somehow -- if we could just
neutralize Jews such as Wolfowitz and Feith and Perle; if Ariel Sharon
could be replaced by a "moderate" Jewish prime minister -- then the
"peace process" could proceed, America could gradually reduce its
involvement in helping the Jews keep the Palestinians repressed, and
eventually Israel no longer would be using America, and everything
would be rosy. And so these knowledgeable Americans expend all of
their wit and energy in these trivial pursuits.
Listen! Do you know what the most hopeful aspect of the conflict
between Jews and Palestinians is now? It is the ongoing radicalization
of the Muslim masses throughout the whole Middle East. The
collaborator governments in Pakistan, in Egypt, in Saudi Arabia are
terrified of the reaction they see among their own people to what
Ariel Sharon is doing to the Palestinians. When Sharon's Jewish troops
shoot Palestinian children, Muslim mobs riot, and governments that now
collaborate with the United States quake. Ariel Sharon is the best
thing that has happened in the Middle East in the last 54 years.
The Palestinian tactic of suicide bombing is being denounced by every
politician and every media spokesman over here now. It's nothing but
terrorism, they all say. There's no justification at all for suicide
bombing, they tell us. Of course, whenever you hear that sort of
unanimity from the politicians and the media people you should be
suspicious. In fact, suicide bombing is the best tactic for the
Palestinians to use now, because it provokes the Jews to step up
reprisals. And the reprisals radicalize the masses in every country in
the Middle East. If just one of the collaborator governments falls,
the spines of all the rest will be stiffened, and the Bush government
will be far less likely to find collaborators for building its
so-called "coalition" to do the will of the Jews in the Middle East.
Suicide bombers now hardly put a dent in the population of five
million Jews in occupied Palestine, and Sharon's bloody reprisals
hardly put a dent in the overall Palestinian population. But if
conflict of this sort continues until just one collaborator government
is overthrown, that ultimately will be worth more than ten thousand
successful suicide
bombings in which only 20 or so Jews are killed each time. In the long
run there can be no real peace in the Middle East and no end to
America's shameful role there -- and no future for the Palestinian
people -- as long as there is an Israel. There seems to be a better
understanding of these things among knowledgeable Palestinians than
among knowledgeable Americans.
Shallow thinking and the pursuit of trivial goals is even worse among
knowledgeable Americans when it comes to domestic problems. They
really do not want to grasp these problems with both hands and deal
with them in a forthright way. Look, for example, at what uncontrolled
immigration has done and is doing to America. And what do
knowledgeable Americans propose to do about that? Very little, really.
They make much of the fact that several of the al-Qaeda hijackers who
carried out the September 11 attack were in the United States only
because of very lax immigration policies, and so that's a good reason
for tightening up the policies.
How about simply rounding up all illegal aliens immediately -- all 12
million of them -- and booting them and all of their offspring out of
the country without further ado?
Oh, no, no, no! We can't do that! Why not? Well, the media never would
stand for it. The media would be all over anyone who even proposed a
mass expulsion of illegal aliens. They would denounce any political
leader who tried to do that as a "racist" and a "neo-Nazi." And so
knowledgeable Americans, who understand the immigration disaster quite
well, continue tiptoeing around it, afraid to do or even say anything
really significant about it: terrified even to think about really
radical solutions that might actually end the problem. And it's the
same with the rest of our domestic problems. Lots of people understand
these problems and are worried about them, but they won't tackle them
in any
significant way. They let the Jews -- the Jewish media and Jewish
money and the entrenched Jewish network -- have their way, for all
practical purposes.
Why? Why are the Jews permitted to get away with all of their
destructive policies and activities without being challenged or
opposed in any significant way? Part of the reason is that the Jews
are very powerful, and therefore many people are afraid to cross them.
They're afraid of the sort of media reaction I just mentioned in
connection with immigration. Everyone understands that the Jews stick
together and will viciously attack anyone who opposes them. It's the
old story, so aptly expressed by the late-16th-century writer, Sir
John Harington. Harington wrote: "Treason doth never prosper: what's
the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason." Today the
Jewish power structure is
prospering, and none dare oppose it or even call it what it is. Well,
that's only part of the reason Jews are permitted to get away with so
much. There's more to it than that. There's a mystique the Jews have
built very carefully around themselves and nurtured diligently. It is
a mystique of piety and injured innocence. It is a mystique that says
to the Gentile world: "We are a gentle and inoffensive race, and
because of this everyone hates us. We're smart and we work hard and
achieve success, and because of this everyone hates us. We are a
highly moral and ethical race, and because of this everyone hates us.
We are a very talented race, with many gifted members, many geniuses,
and because of this everyone hates us. We are a very altruistic race,
a race of philanthropists who only want to make a better world for
everyone, and because of this everyone hates us."
Many simpletons among the lemmings simply accept these claims at face
value. Many knowledgeable people, however, who can see through these
claims to the real Jews hiding behind them, still hesitate to
challenge them. Part of the Jewish mystique is the so-called
"Holocaust." In its most simpleminded form the "Holocaust" story is
the claim that the
Germans hated the Jews for the reasons I just mentioned -- for their
gentleness and their success and their morality and their talent and
their altruism -- and because of this hatred roasted six million of
them during the Second World War in "gas ovens," to use one of the
Jews' favorite "Holocaust" phrases.
Actually, the "Holocaust" is a very powerful part of the Jewish
mystique. The Jews crafted the "Holocaust" story with great care and
great effort -- well, actually not with as much care as they might
have used: it's as full of holes as a Swiss cheese, but still it is
sufficient to make most people, even those who understand what Jews
are really like, hesitate to attack them. People don't want to be seen
as bullies. They don't want to be seen as so insensitive that they
would criticize the Jews, who already have suffered so much, poor
dears, at the hands of anti-Semites.
In several past broadcasts we've looked at a number of the lies and
exaggerations and distortions that make up the "Holocaust" story.
There are a number of good books available on the subject from the
sponsor of this broadcast, National Vanguard Books, including Norman
Finklestein's excellent book The Holocaust Industry, which I discussed
in an earlier broadcast. The point is that despite the lies, despite
the fact that many knowledgeable Americans are aware of the lies, the
"Holocaust" still serves its purpose for the Jews. People are afraid
of the image conjured up by the "Holocaust."
Perhaps it's that American life is too soft... Whatever the reason,
many otherwise knowledgeable and hardheaded Americans just can't
entertain the idea of rounding up the Jews and getting rid of them,
even when the situation is as urgent as it is in America today. And
really, in the long run that is the only way to solve the Jewish
problem.
The Germans understood that, back in the 1930s, and they had the
courage and the foresight to act on their understanding. Unlike
Americans today, they had an honest government concerned above all
with the survival, welfare, and progress of the German people, and
they began doing what was necessary, forcing the Jews to emigrate
wholesale from Germany beginning in 1933. And because of that the
Jewish propaganda machine has attacked the Germans so viciously, has
so blackened and demonized their image, that today even knowledgeable
people are afraid to be associated with that image. They are afraid to
say that the Germans were right, that the Germans were justified, and
that we need to do the same if we are to survive. So, as I said, the
"Holocaust" story, despite its
glaring discrepancies and lies, still serves as a shield for the Jews;
it still protects them from criticism.
Well, mostly. In parts of Europe not quite as poisoned by Jewish
propaganda as America is, the shield has slipped a bit. A large
British department store chain, Selfridges, has yielded to demands
from anti-Israel demonstrators and has removed from its shelves
products marked "Made in Israel." Last week the second largest
supermarket chain in Norway, Coop Norge -- which is to say, Norway
Coop, announced its decision to boycott all Israeli imports. That
decision was not the result of pressure from anti-Israel demonstrators
but was based on the feeling by Coop Norge management that it would be
immoral to continue supporting the Israeli economy by selling Israeli
imports under the
present circumstances. That is a step forward, though it is a long way
from what is needed.
The Jews, of course, immediately began waving their "Holocaust" story
around, and now, as the boycott movement catches hold in Scandinavia,
they are trying to portray themselves as injured innocents being
attacked once more by "anti-Semites." They are comparing the growing
Scandinavian boycott of Israeli products to the German boycott of
Jewish merchants in the late 1930s. Certainly, a boycott of Israeli
products is a good thing, and the fact that such a boycott is even
thinkable by big businessmen today is a sign that the Jewish mystique
-- and in particular the Jewish "Holocaust" story -- is becoming a bit
shopworn. It no longer has the hypnotic power that it once had -- at
least, in some parts of the world. And I suppose that we should be
happy about that. The unfortunate fact remains, however, that in
America the Jews still have their money and
their media and their entrenched network of bureaucrats, and even if
the "Holocaust" story has lost some of its charm in Europe, it still
keeps most knowledgeable Americans intimidated.
Knowledge isn't enough. Courage and boldness also are necessary.
Honesty and forthrightness are necessary also. Tiptoeing around the
critical issues of our time isn't enough. Tiny reforms in our
disastrous foreign policy and in our disastrous immigration policy and
in a dozen other disastrous policies aren't enough. We need to stop
apologizing to the people who are destroying us and go full bore at
destroying them instead.
Instead of being hypnotized by the "Holocaust" story we need to look
with clear eyes at why there was a need for action against the Jews in
Germany in the 1930s and 1940s. The Jews' claim today that the Germans
were suffering from collective insanity and had no reason for trying
to get the Jews off their backs is as phony as George Bush's claim
that
Osama bin Laden had no reason for attacking America on September 11.
Wherever Jews go they corrupt and destroy. That is their nature,
always and everywhere. Let us be thankful to the Palestinians who now
are making such terrible sacrifices to help the world see what the
Jews are like. And I suppose we also should be thankful to Ariel
Sharon for demonstrating so forthrightly to the world what Jews are
like.
Let us hope that the conflict between Jews and Palestinians
intensifies and lasts long enough to wake up many more of our people
around the world and fill them with disgust at America's continuing
support for the Jews. Let us hope that it lasts long enough to bring
about the overthrow of every collaborationist regime in the Muslim
world. Let us hope that it brings about an airtight oil embargo
against the United States and shuts off the lights in every shopping
mall and every sports stadium in America long enough for the lemmings
to become restless and begin asking questions. Let us hope that it
makes the efforts of every fool and every traitor who is striving for
a resumption of the so-called "peace process" so obviously futile that
these efforts no longer have the power to deceive anyone.
Ultimately, of course, we must not depend on the Palestinian suicide
bombers or on Ariel Sharon's murder squads to do for us what we should
be doing for ourselves. Ultimately we must stop tiptoeing and begin
marching boldly and forthrightly toward solving our own problems."
Dave Heil
> On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 05:19:33 +0000, Dave Heil <k8...@frontiernet.net>
> wrote:
>
>> I have an easy answer for your friend, Toupee. Have the Palestinians
>> stop killing Israeli children.
>
>
Stan de SD
> On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 09:36:43 -0800 (PST), Stan de SD
>
> >As to be expected, our resident Nazi and anti-semite chimes in to
> >portray the poor widdle Pallies as "victims".
>
> As to be expected our resident Jew chimes in to portray the Jews as
> decent human beings.
Unlike you, I have actually been to both Israel proper and the
Palestinian territories, so I have some first first-hand knowledge of
the situation, as opposed to your quotation of abstracts from Conspiro-
kook Monthly or wherever else you get all your information.
>
> >The fact of the matter
> >is that it is Hamaz, Hizbollah, and other other terrorist/militant/
> >fruitcake groups in the Palestinian terroritories that kill children.
>
> By Stuart Littlewood
>
> 31 December 2008
>
> Stuart Littlewood shows how Israel's public relations strategy frames
> and defines the situation in Israel's own terms regardless of the
> truth and, using advanced propaganda skills and the elaborate Israel
> lobby network, it seeks to persuade Western politicians and media to
> accept Israel's version of events.
You can't even refute what I said. You have to quote some other kook
instead. Figures...
Michael Ejercito
>
> >As to be expected, our resident Nazi and anti-semite chimes in to
> >portray the poor widdle Pallies as "victims".
>
> As to be expected our resident Jew chimes in to portray the Jews as
> decent human beings.
beings.
You are a Nazi.
As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.
You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know
you can not measure up.
You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.
You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.
You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of
National
Socialism.
Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you... which is why you choose minor
children as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent
adults in a consensually sexual
way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a helpless victim, be
it a prepubescent
boy, or a patient in a mental hospital.
That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or
honest about it.
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 05:19:33 +0000, Dave Heil <k...@frontiernet.net>
> wrote:
>
> >I have an easy answer for your friend, Toupee. Have the Palestinians
> >stop killing Israeli children.
>
> On Wednesday, March 6th, Ha'aretz, the prominent Israeli newspaper,
> reported that "15 people" were killed the previous afternoon in
> a "suicide" bus bombing in Haifa. The names of the killed and wounded
> were not disclosed for more than 24 hours, but personal details about
> the bomber were released immediately. According to Ha'aretz he
> was "Mahmoud Amadan Salim Kawasme, 20, a computer student from Hebron
> Polytechnic Institute. A letter was found on his body that included
> quotations from the Koran. Kawasme is the 20th student from this
> college to carry out attacks against Israeli targets since the
> beginning of the Intifada."(2)
The smart thing to do would have been to wear a distinctive armband
(for entitlement to POW protections) and bomb the bus from a
distance.
>
> Most readers worldwide were told only a half-truth, that the bomber
> was a 20 year-old Arab Muslim who deliberately murders innocent
> civilians. George W. Bush poured glue on the lie by condemning the
> act as "terrorism against the innocent." We want to assume our
> President tells the whole truth, but he did not.
>
They are our enemies just as they are the enemies of Israel.
They share common cause with Osama bin Laden.
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> the United Nations, should take note of the dire situation in Gaza,"
> said Falk.
>
> "The ordeal of the 1.5 million residents of Gaza affected by the
> Israeli blockade, over half of whom are children, has been allowed to
> continue without any formal objection by governments and at the UN."
>
I guess Arafat should have accepted Barak's offer.
Michael
Bert Byfield
> armband
>(for entitlement to POW protections) and bomb the bus from a
> distance.
That's how we Yankees do it.
>> Most readers worldwide were told only a half-truth, that the
>> bomber was a 20 year-old Arab Muslim who deliberately murders
>> innocent civilians. George W. Bush poured glue on the lie by
>> condemning the act as "terrorism against the innocent." We want
>> to assume our President tells the whole truth, but he did not.
George Bush will do time in purgatory for this false concern about
innocent people, after he murdered 1,000,000 innocent Iraqis.
> They are our enemies just as they are the enemies of Israel.
The USA and Israel are NOT the same country, no matter how much you
want to sell that idea.
> They share common cause with Osama bin Laden. Michael
Oooohhh, he used the magic spell that hypnotizes Americans.
John Q Public
You do know Arafat died well before BO got in office?
Another stunning political commentary from the left
Stan de SD
Michael was referring to Ehud Barak, Israel's Prime Minister from 1999
to 2001, current Defense Minister, and head of the Avoda (Labor
Party), not Barack Obama. And no, Michael's not a lefty...
Topaz
<stan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Unlike you, I have actually been to both Israel proper and the
>Palestinian territories, so I have some first first-hand knowledge of
>the situation, as opposed to your quotation of abstracts from Conspiro-
>kook Monthly or wherever else you get all your information.
You're a Jew.
By Jim Taylor
I believe I can, in one fell swoop prove that we have the
dumbest country on earth. All I need to do is mention that since 1948,
Americans have given Israel over 15 million dollars a day from your
salaries, paychecks and various earnings. No other nation on this
earth is dumb enough to do that not even the African ones. And to make
it worse you people do it gladly and with joy in your hearts. No one
complains, except me. Everyone else seems to think it is all right for
every American citizen to be robbed in this manner every day of their
lives with no end in sight. Can any nation be dumber that this? Most
Americans are so enslaved via Zionist propaganda and government
pronouncements that they think we owe this money so the Israelis can
live a much better life than in the good old USA. They have luxuries
you cannot afford. They take vacations all over the world which
Americans on average cannot afford. And when they do this they always
America and criticize you people who are the very ones who provide
them with these opportunities. I say you cannot get dumber than that.
The Israelis buy expensive things with YOUR money and then make fun of
you for being this dumb.
The worst part about this involuntary servitude is that the cruel
and criminal Israelis use YOUR money for arms to murder Arabs on a
daily basis, and sometimes they also kill Americans with your money.
So every American taxpayer is guilty of murder because under the law
anyone who pays someone to commit murder is equally guilty.
If the Arabs are so stupid and inefficient as the Zionists tell us,
how was it when the Palestinians ran Palestine they never needed help
from the U.S. or anyone else. The ran that state very well without a
cent of assistance from any other place.
>
>You can't even refute what I said. You have to quote some other kook
>instead. Figures...
Jew = liar
Topaz
Here is part of a speech by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, delivered in
Nuernberg on September 13th, 1935 at the Seventh National-Socialist
Party Congress:
"Almost without exception, the intellectual leaders of Marxist atheism
in Germany were Jews, among them being Erich Weinert, Felix Abraham,
Dr. Levy-Lenz and others. At regular meetings, held in the presence of
a notary public, members were requested to register their declaration
of withdrawal from their church for a fee of 2 Marks. And this the
fight for atheism was carried on. Between 1918 and 1933 the
withdrawals from the German Evangelical Churches alone amounted to
two-and-a-half million persons in Germany. The programme which these
atheistic societies laid down in regard to sexual matters is amply
charcterized in the following demands publicly expressed at meetings
and distributed in leaflet form:
1) The complete abrogation of the paragraphs of the law dealing with
the crime of abortion, and the right to have abortion procured free of
charge in State Hospitals.
2) Non-interference with prostitution.
3) The abrogation of all bourgeois-capitalistic regulations in regard
to marriage and divorce.
4) Official registration to be optional and the children to be
educated by the community.
5) Abrogation of all penalties for sexual perversities and amnesty to
be granted to all persons condemned as 'sexual criminals'.
"Truly a case of methodical insanity, which has for its aim the
wilful destruction of the nations and their civilization and the
substitute of barbarism as a fundamental principle of public life.
"Where are the men behind the scenes of this virulent world
movement? Who are the inventors of all this madness? Who transplanted
this ensemble into Russia and is today making the attempt to have it
prevail in other countries? The answer to these question discloses the
actual secret of our anti-Jewish policy and our uncomromising fight
against Jewry; for the Bolshevic International is in reality nothing
less than a Jewish International."
Michael Ejercito
He started the second infitada while CLINTON was in office.
He threw away a chance for peace, which eroded sympathy Americans
had for his cause, and what sympathy was there only existed within
anti-American traitors after 9/11.
Michael
Topaz
Israeli official sources claim that suicide bombers from Palestine
have killed 248 Israeli under the age of 18 years since the Intifada
began in 1987. Human rights groups say 2931 Palestinians have been
shot or bombed to death, including 541 children, in just the last
four years. Men in uniform deliberately fractured the arm of a 10-
year old boy named Kamal, and the life was crushed out of an American
girl named Rachael under a Caterpillar bulldozer. "SUICIDE BOMBERS"
ARE BLAMED, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, FOR NEARLY EVERY DEATH IN ISRAEL.
This writer has consistently argued that it is far more accurate to
lay the responsibility for deaths on both sides on the doorstep of
"Christian-Zionist" leaders of American churches and "celebrity media
Christians" who, we find, are more bloody handed than a handful of
young adults with crude homemade bombs. Were it not for these failed
religious men of peace there would be no suicide bombers, there would
have been no Day 911, Iraq would not have been destroyed and 600 dead
American military would still be alive, as would countless Iraqis who
been killed. See ENDING OUR PLAGUE:
( http://www.whtt.org/whtt.shtml?articles/EndPl.htm )
Without Christian-Zionist influence there would be an uneasy peace
between the Muslims and secular Jews who were forced long ago to share
Palestine, and the Christian-Zionist followers who enable war are
proud of what they have done. They are the crucifiers of the
Palestinian people. To see why, we must examine the issues-suicide
bombers, torture and assassinations-in context.
AN EXCUSE FOR MURDER
Israel needs an excuse for its public assassinations policy, which it
claims has killed 327 Palestinians. It is not acceptable before the
eyes of other world leaders to execute a crippled and aged religious
leader, even if he is politically active. Other politicians cannot
help but wonder if one of them might be next. World revulsion is
rising. The excuse offered is that Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, 66, founder
and political leader of the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas), was
involved in the "suicide bombings." (http://www.whtt.org/whtt.shtml?
rpr/Yassin.htm)
Israel must also have an excuse to build a thirty-foot concrete wall
around three million people. It is not enough to call it a "fence."
Again, the excuse is the "suicide bombers."
Israel's policy of torturing detainees could not exist without an
excuse. Israel's excuse for each and every brutal act is always the
same. But do the acts of the human bombs validate assassination and
torture? The statistics and logic say no.
OBSERVATIONS IN GAZA
I will refer to the Gaza Strip because I have contacts there and
first-hand observations to rely on, having personally witnessed a
missile attack against civilians and interviewed persons and agencies
that specialize in the impact of mass terror on an imprisoned society.
In Gaza I studied the motivation behind the suicide bombing.
Are the acts of the human bombers a valid reason for the murder of
Sheikh Yassin and those who were with him at prayer on a Friday dawn?
Statistical reports from American and Israeli media and testimony from
mental heath agencies in Gaza City say they are not. Human bombs are
a result, not a cause of Israel's ongoing aggressions.
THE TERM "SUICIDE BOMBER" IS ITSELF ORWELLIAN. There is nothing
suicidal about these humans who carry the bombs. It is doubtful that
a single bomber ever "committed suicide" in the sense of carrying out
a bombing for the deliberate purpose of killing himself or herself.
According to the Israeli government, most "suicide bombers" are
unsuccessful and never detonate a bomb. If the motive was to end
their lives, a Palestinian man or woman could hardly pick a less
certain way to do it. They face extreme physical challenges and a
terrible risk of being taken prisoner. There are easier ways to kill
oneself, such as drowning in the nearby Mediterranean or jumping off a
three-story building. The bomber's purpose is to end the lives of
others, which is also the purpose of every "smart bomb" fired by the
Israelis. The bomber's own life is a sacrifice. Suicide bombers are
soldiers without uniforms.
WHERE ARE THE BOMBERS WHO LIVED?
Based on the Israeli claims, the vast majority of human bombs are
killed, captured, or arrested in advance. It is reasonable to wonder,
based on Israel's human right record, if they die a terrible and
lonesome death, for as best I can tell, they are never heard from
again. One must ask, what becomes of them?
People in Gaza have told me the Israeli spy system is the best in the
world; anyone can be watched at any time. Israel no doubt does
discover most bombers before they get started, since the bombers are
operating from within a closely guarded prison. They must first make
a jailbreak in order to carry a bomb out of Gaza into Israel. Theirs
must be a most frightening mission, requiring determination and
extreme courage far beyond what I can even imagine.
The thought of being taken alive by the Israelis while in possession
of a bomb must be terrifying, given the knowledge that capture will
probably lead to a slow, agonizing death far worse than instant
incineration or decapitation. Israeli interrogators are capable of
inflicting suffering more painful than even Mel Gibson was able to
portray in his movie of Christ's death on the Cross. Based on
Israel's record, known to every Gaza child, the Israelis do things to
extract information that Gibson could not dare portray on the screen!
If most human bombers are caught, as Israelis claim, what becomes of
these prisoners? Why do we never hear about them again? I have yet
to hear of a trial of an "attempted suicide bomber." What is done to
the hundreds of young adults Israel says it intercepts? It is time we
found out.
It is also time we found out about the tens of thousands who have been
arrested and who remain in custody, sometimes for years without
charges, simply because they were suspected of something. Sheikh
Yassin lost an eye in a beating he sustained during interrogation
before his release from an Israeli prison in 1991. Israelis did not
spare a quadriplegics in a wheel chair.
Israel uses incidents it brings upon itself to justify its policies.
Thus, when a youth, a man or a woman bomber destroys a bus on which
dozens of Israeli soldiers are probably riding, Israel accelerates its
daily air raids against the civilian population of Gaza. It never
stops bombing, invading, molesting, assaulting, humiliating and
detaining. It only increases or decreases the pressure and the
viciousness of the attacks, all of which are characterized as
reprisals.
GREATLY EXAGGERATED
In the entire 17-year history of the uprising against the occupation,
generally referred to as the Intifada, there have only been about one
hundred human bombs exploded; Israeli government reports are somewhat
confusing as to exact numbers when it comes to the "suicide bombers."
Ariel Sharon reported in a speech during the 2003 Jenin occupation
that there had been 58. Our count is taken from Israeli Ministry of
Foreign Affairs reports. The Israeli Defense Force also produces
slightly conflicting reports in a monthly bar chart listing "attempts"
versus "successful suicide bombings." In February 2004 its charts
show a total of 136 explosions from September 2000 through December
2003. Whichever number is correct, 58 or 136, it is a small number
indeed. We will use 100, because we have the name, age, and rank of
every person killed in those 100 reported bombings.
Each human bomb carries a very small charge of explosives-only the
amount one person, sometimes a woman, can carry. Incidents of mass
terror by Israelis using warplanes, tanks and helicopters are much
greater in number and limited in killing power only by how much US
taxpayers will finance. These attacks go on somewhere every night and
probably number in the thousands. The attack I witnessed was one of
three I could hear in the distance in a single week. Mercifully, it
stopped at 4:00 AM after 40 missiles were fired. I photographed about
20 of them before my camcorder battery went dead.
Shootings and beatings at checkpoints and in homes, detainments and
harassment never end and do not even make print unless a foreign
reporter or photographer happens to be on hand. Palestinian hospital
records and records of humanitarian organizations indicate that as
many as 2000 of their children have been killed by Israeli since the
beginning of the First Intifada in October of 1987, and many more have
been wounded and maimed. It is children of this war who have grown up
to be the human bombers.
Torture of Palestinian prisoners
Torture in Israel is no secret; it is acknowledged at the highest
level of its government, the Supreme Court. Alexander Cockburn,
author of THE POLITICS OF ANTI-SEMITISM, states, "every government
tortures prisoner; Israel is the only one that admits it."
The barbaric practice of extracting confessions from "detainees" by
torture has always been used in Israel and was legitimatised in Israel
by the 1994 Landau Decision. Human rights groups have fought against
the use of torture for some 50 years, and it has been the subject of
many UN resolutions, including one that declared Israel to be a
"terrorist state."
For a few years Israel forbade the practice, probably to get
the "terrorist" sanction lifted, but the Landau decision legalizes
what has always been practiced. * The Landau Commission Report
(CAT/C/16/Add.4) permits "MODERATE PHYSICAL PRESSURE" as a lawful
mode of interrogation. See committee against Torture: Israel. 12/6/94
Any Israeli military or policeman may torture detainees as long as it
can be passed off as "moderate pressure." The problem is, nobody is
allowed to watch to see how "moderate" the torture really is. Extreme
pressure can be applied as long as no one is officially watching and
the pressure does not leave extreme and obvious marks on the victim.
Israel has developed torture methods that do not show much, but some
signs can be clearly seen anyway.
"Torture" is a terrifying word in the English language, too horrible
to contemplate. It is truly an instrument of terror. It is a word we
associate with the sadist Henry the 8th. It is the kind of terrorism
perfected in the Russia gulag by the Bolsheviks. Millions have
migrated to Israel. Alexander Solzhenitzyn's books on life in the
gulag have sections devoted to the interrogation methods used. Israel
has adopted the same methods.
Among the common forms of extreme torture used by Israelis is the
breaking of bones of boys caught throwing rocks. We reported one such
incident three years ago. A 10 year old boy named Kamal Ali As'idah
who lives with his parents and four sisters in Jerusalem was caught
throwing rocks on April 6, 2001 and was "detained" by Israeli defense
forces.
Young Kamal happened to be photographed by a Reuters photographer
while being dragged away by six soldiers much larger than him. So
frightened was the boy that his jeans were visibly soaked with his own
urine. Israelis contemptuously referred to Kamal as "the piss child."
KAMAL IS ONE OF MANY
What is unique about Kamal's detention is that some Americans actually
went to the trouble to see what happened to Kamal in detention. His
father later told the Editor of Washington Report that his son was
released after eight hours, badly beaten to the head and legs and with
his throwing arm was broken. But this brutality against the child was
not the end of it. As retribution for his son's act, Kamal's father
was fired from his job with an Israeli tour bus company when the
employer learned of the incident.
See the stories of Kamal with vivid photos:
http://www.whtt.org/whtt.shtml?articles/011123pw.htm and
http://www.whtt.org/whtt.shtml?articles/010725pw2.htm
Israelis beat and break the bones of 10 year olds all the time and the
media ignores it. Mid-eastern doctors have told me that men are often
raped with sharp instruments and beaten on every body part,
particularly the genitals. Electric shock leaves few outward marks.
Women prisoners are not excluded from torture.
Selective execution is another form of the systematic physiological
torture inflicted on the entire population of Gaza. Israel's admitted
assassinations of some 327 suspected persons all rely on the same
justification: "suicide bombings." But statistics reveal this is a
flimsy excuse. Physical and mental torture (terrorism) is an everyday
fact of life in Gaza. Civilians are bombed, burned, incinerated and
buried. Everyone knows victims, and reprisals against families are
and always have been standard fare in occupied Palestine.
Bombing where least expected is a form of psychological torture that
implants fears in the minds of innocent civilians, especially the
children, who learn their parents cannot hide or protect them.
Bombings and the constant threat of bombings are forms of torture
inflicted on every Gazan mother, father and child. They live with the
knowledge that a bomb or tank shell could come through a wall any
time. Children in the camps are killed on their doorsteps by
rubber-coated zinc bullets shot by soldiers who will be held blameless
regardless of circumstances.
I did not feel "awe" at the enormous show of American firepower as I
watched hovering Apaches pounding away from over my rooftop; I felt
anger and frustration that there was no way to resist it. It did not
make me want to leave Gaza; it made me want to be a Palestinian, maybe
even a human bomb if there was no other way.
I began to resent the Israelis at the checkpoints and the American
government's ongoing gifts of guided bombs to be fired from Apaches
and F-16s supplied and paid for by American taxpayers. I resented the
night vision magic that allow the men in the Apaches to see me on my
rooftop without me being able to see them. I resented the churches
back home for their blind enabling of the genocide they support and
faun over but refuse to look at. There is no room for disbelief in
Gaza. When you are there you see the mass torture.
The effect on the people of Gaza was explained to me vividly by Dr.
Eyad R. El Sarraj, founder of the GAZA COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH
PROGRAMME. Dr. Sarraj told me of the epidemic of bedwetting that
plagues the families, who are living in amazingly tight quarters,
sometimes eight or more in a single room. As seen with Kamal, the
brave little rock thrower who the Israelis insulted after breaking his
arm, bedwetting comes from terror.
Dr. Sarraj also stated that his organization systematically tracks
down the families of "suicide bombers," whose homes are always
immediately destroyed. He stated that in every case, without
exception (this was in March 2002) every bomber had witnessed one or
more acts of abuse against his father by the Israelis, such as a
severe beating or a long period of imprisonment. What father's son
cannot understand such an emotion? It made me wanted to go out with
them and throw rocks.
According to a 1993 British Medical Journal study of 1500 Gaza
children, 90% had been tear-gassed, 52% had been beaten, 11.2% had
been detained, 97% had seen their homes raided, and 1.1% had seen
their homes destroyed.
In another study of 477 former "detainees" it was found that 29.14%
required psychiatric intervention, 24.72% had some form of organic
brain damage, and 41.9% had trouble adapting to family life. This
study went on to say, "70% of the children in the Gaza Strip had been
exposed to 4 or 5 traumatic experiences."
(Source: PALESTINE IN TRANSITION, GAZA COMMUNITY HEALTH PROGRAMME)
TORTURE OF DETAINEES
"Detainee" is an Israeli euphemism for someone who is taken away
without arrest or charge, to be tortured and held indefinitely without
contact with the outside world. The detainee disappears just as the
Russians described by Solzhenitzyn disappeared into the "Black
Mariahs" (prison vans) of the gulag. The detainee is allowed no
lawyer or phone call. Some are never seen again, and of those who
are, most report they were questioned and systematically tortured both
mentally and physically.
By torture I do not mean the mild inconvenience and discomfort one
might encounter in any police station in America if you are arrested.
I once experienced painful overly tight handcuffs clamped on me by a
person who wanted it to hurt. It did. My arms may not have been
quite the same for a while, but this is not torture, as the detainee
experiences it. I was not terrorized because I knew the surly cop
would not kill me. I was never afraid, just uncomfortable. Terror is
the fear that comes from knowing you might be killed and there is no
one to protect you. That is what the Gazan faces when he is detained.
Everyone in America knows that torture is illegal and he will only be
pressed to the point of discomfort. Not so in Israel where tight
handcuffs that cut off the blood and leave little scars and bruises
would be a picnic for a detainee. He faces unchecked deliberate
brutality called "moderate pressure." Israeli style torture has been
carried to the point of death in more than a few well-documented
cases, and permanent physical and mental impairment that cannot be
measured is a routine result of the Israeli policy of violent shaking
considered "moderate force." Abuse that can be detected, like Kamal's
broken arm, is just shrugged off as an accident resulting from
resistance. This is clearly seen in interviews with the Israeli
military in the award winning film, People and the Land (link)
Israel justifies all torture by blaming it on the "suicide bombers."
No matter what it does or how many people it maims and kills, its acts
are always laid at the feet of those few who go on impossible raids to
bomb Israeli targets with a few pounds of explosives by walking into
their very lair and exploding the bomb by hand. Israel makes no other
effort to justify reprisals, detention, assassination or torture; it
offers no explanation for why it executes entire families because one
member is "suspected."
If you debate an Israeli about the bulldozer driver who purposely
mashed an American college student named Rachel Corrie to a pulp, your
opponent will invariably respond that she was defending suspected
"suicide bombers" and deserved her punishment, as did the homeowners
of the house being bulldozed. If you ask about the deliberate
starvation of Gazan children by locking down the Gaza Strip, just as
the USSR locked down the gulags, the answer will be that the "bombers"
cause it.
The separation "wall" that is a functional replica of the Berlin Wall
is, we are told, in response to the "bombers." The raping of men with
sharp instruments while under interrogation, or the crushing of
reproductive organs with batons and boots are all needed because of
the "bombers." Never mind that there were no "suicide bombers" for
the first 39 years of the Israeli conflict and that torture was at it
worst in those early years because there was so little international
interest or concern.
Torture is carried on against mothers and dads by the constant din of
nighttime bombings and the hunger that threatens many. Every act of
brutality, be it the breaking of 10 year old Kamal's arm, the murder
of aged religious leader Sheik Yemeni, the assassination of human
rights protesters or photographers who photograph the wrong scenes,
the building of a wall that encroaches on and cuts up still more
Palestinian land and deprives Palestinians of still more water-all are
excused as responses to the acts of less than 100 young people who
knew they and their people had little or no future.
Israel is perhaps the only country in the world where torture is
legal, and it is not denied. What is denied is that the practice of
brutalizing prisoners is carried out far beyond the allowable limits,
as thousands have reported. Israel practices terrorism against
"detainees" as a method of deterrence. It breaks the arms of children
caught throwing rocks, imposes indecent humiliation and pain to
extract the names of family and friends, and shakes men almost to
death to destroy their brain cells, making some incapable of being an
enemy -all to deter them from standing up against Israel.
The people living in the cantons of Gaza and the West Bank have been
subjected to crucifixion for 54 years. It is documented and
undeniable. Compare this to the frail acts of 100 human bombers who
all died at the end of their mission.
Topaz
Dr Joseph Goebbels, Der Angriff, 21 January 1929.
The Jew
by Joseph Goebbels
Everything is discussed openly in Germany, and every German claims the
right to have an opinion on any and all questions. One is Catholic,
the other Protestant, one an employee, the other an employer, a
capitalist, a socialist, a democrat, an aristocrat. There is nothing
dishonorable about choosing one side or the other of a question.
Discussions happen in public, and where matters are unclear or
confused one settles it by argument and counter argument. But there is
one problem that is not discussed publicly, one that it is delicate
even to mention: the Jewish question. It is taboo in our republic.
The Jew is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a
scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like
water off a raincoat. But call him a Jew and you will be astonished at
how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: "I've
been found out."
One cannot defend himself against the Jew. He attacks with lightening
speed from his position of safety and uses his abilities to crush any
attempt at defense.
Quickly he turns the attacker's charges back on him, and the attacker
becomes the liar, the troublemaker, the terrorist. Nothing could be
more mistaken than to defend oneself. That is just what the Jew wants.
He can invent a new lie every day for the enemy to respond to, and the
result is that the enemy spends so much time defending himself that he
has no time to do what the Jew really fears: to attack. The accused
has become the accuser, and loudly he shoves the accuser into the
dock. So it always was in the past when a person or a movement fought
the Jew. That is what would happen to us as well were we not fully
aware of his nature, and if we lacked the courage to draw the
following radical conclusions:
1. One cannot fight the Jew by positive means. He is a negative, and
this negative must be erased from the German system, or he will
forever corrupt it.
2. One cannot discuss the Jewish question with the Jews. One can
hardly prove to a person that one has the duty to render him harmless.
3. One cannot allow the Jew the same means one would give an honest
opponent, for he is no honorable opponent. He will use generosity and
nobility only to trap his enemy.
4. The Jew has nothing to say about German questions. He is a
foreigner, an alien, who only enjoys the rights of a guest, rights
that he always abuses.
5. The so-called religious morality of the Jews is no morality at all,
rather an encouragement to betrayal. Therefore, they have no claim to
protection from the state.
6. The Jew is not smarter than we are, rather only cleverer and
craftier. His system cannot be defeated economically-he follows
entirely different moral principles than we do. It can only be broken
through political means.
7. A Jew cannot insult a German. Jewish slanders are but badges of
honor for a German opponent of the Jews.
8. The more a German person or a German movement opposes the Jew, the
more valuable it is. If someone is attacked by the Jews, that is a
sure sign of his virtue. He who is not persecuted by the Jews, or who
is praised by them, is useless and dangerous.
9. The Jew evaluates German questions from the Jewish standpoint. As a
result, the opposite of what he says must be true.
10. One must either affirm or reject anti-Semitism. He who defends the
Jews harms his own people. One can only be a Jewish lackey or a Jewish
opponent. Opposing the Jews is a matter of personal hygiene.
These principles give the anti-Jewish movement a chance of success.
Only such a movement will be taken seriously by the Jews, only such a
movement will be feared by them.
The fact that he shouts and complains about such a movement therefore
is only a sign that it is right. We are therefore delighted that we
are constantly attacked in the Jewish gazettes. They may shout about
terror. We answer with Mussolini's familiar words: "Terror? Never! It
is social hygiene. We take these individuals out of circulation just
as a doctor does to a bacterium.
Dave Heil
> Charles E. Carlson
>
> Israeli official sources claim that suicide bombers from Palestine
> have killed 248 Israeli under the age of 18 years since the Intifada
> began in 1987. Human rights groups say 2931 Palestinians have been
> shot or bombed to death, including 541 children, in just the last
> four years. Men in uniform deliberately fractured the arm of a 10-
> year old boy named Kamal, and the life was crushed out of an American
> girl named Rachael under a Caterpillar bulldozer. "SUICIDE BOMBERS"
> ARE BLAMED, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, FOR NEARLY EVERY DEATH IN ISRAEL.
>
> This writer has consistently argued that it is far more accurate to
> lay the responsibility for deaths on both sides on the doorstep of
> "Christian-Zionist" leaders of American churches and "celebrity media
What are you, some kind of Iranian hate monger?
Dave Heil
> Dr Joseph Goebbels, Der Angriff, 21 January 1929.
>
> The Jew
> by Joseph Goebbels
The Jews have to be snickering over the end of the clan Goebbels.
Stan de SD
> Here is part of a speech by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, delivered in
> Nuernberg on September 13th, 1935 at the Seventh National-Socialist
> Party Congress:
I know you sit home with the windows closed wacking on your little pee-
pee while reading these Nazi speeches, but nobody else gives a shit.
Michael Ejercito
> Nuernberg on September 13th, 1935 at the Seventh National-Socialist
> Party Congress:
>
> "Almost without exception, the intellectual leaders of Marxist atheism
> in Germany were Jews, among them being Erich Weinert, Felix Abraham,
> Dr. Levy-Lenz and others.
Topaz
Topaz
Here are quotes from a speech delivered by Dr. Joseph Goebbels
at the National Socialist Party Congress, Nuernberg, 1937.
"'Spain represents the world at the cross-roads.' Thus wrote
the Bolshevic press organ, Die Rundschau, in its issue dated July 22,
1937. That one sentance precisely defines the international
significance of the Spanish problem. It states exactly what the
Spanish problem is. Here the final decision must lie either with
Bolshevism or the principle of Authority. On the one side stands
ruinous anarchy and, on the other, orderly constructive development."
"Nations which in recent years have kept their eyes closed to
the startling growth of the international Bolshevic menace will one
day experience a terrible awakening from this moral narcosis. The fact
that we, German National Socialists, as conscious and uncompromising
protaganists against the Bolshevic world-front, are still condemned to
play the part of a preacher in the wilderness, calling out to deaf
ears--this cannot prevent us from seeing things as they are and
calling them by their right names. For if the constantly increasing
extension of this Bolshevic infection in Europe should cause still
greater disaster, then future historians will be in a position to
record the fact that we, German National Socialists, were not among
those who allowed themselves to be led astray in the universal chaos
of thought and mental fog purposely created as a sort of smoke-screen
by an insidious epidemic of political propaganda. Nothing could make
us deviate in the least from the straight road we have taken.
"From the very nature of the case it is obvious that the
subversive forces of International Jewry will raise a tumult of rage
when we clearly and dispassionately lay bare the background of this
revolutionary developement which is extending through the world. For,
after all, they are the only people who are drawing profit forn the
chaotic ruin which Bolshevism is bringing upon mankind. That on this
account they will swamp us with a torrrent of abuse and lies and
calumnies is only an honour for us and a further proof that we are
right in warning Europe against this peril."
"The fight which General Franco is waging, with the support of all
the constructive elements, against the Bolshevic menace to his native
land is at the same time a fight for civilization."
"The Moscow Comintern never tires of impressing on public
opinion thoughout the world the theory that the national movement,
which on July 17, 1936, intervened in the seething developements in
Spain, was a military rising oragnised by reactionary generals and
that this rising was definately repudiated by the Spanish people. The
truth however is that this national movement was in reality an act of
self-defence on the part of the people, against the revolt which had
been planned by the Spanish Communist Party for that time and was
subsequently postponed to August 1936. This communist revolt had been
planned in Moscow several years previously, organized from Moscow and
directed from Moscow, and is still being carried out in practice from
Moscow today."
"In 1935 the annual funds which Moscow contributed for the
support of the Communist Party in Spain totalled several million
pesetas, of which two millions were officially acknowledged as having
been paid by the Comintern itself. At the 7th World Congress of the
Comintern in Moscow, in 1935, Dimitroff gave instructions for the
formation of a Front Populaire in Spain. Between February 16 and April
19,1936, 140 people were murdered by gangs of red revolutionaries, and
529 buildings were burned down and destroyed before the Bolshevic
Revolution officially broke out."
"We can account for this baffling style of mutual admiration
between Bolshevism and Western Liberalist Intellectualism only if we
assume it to be some form of mental disease."
"During February and March 101 Russian Soviet aeroplanes were shipped
from Reval to Spain. And on March 1st, 50 heavy guns from Soviet
Russia were brought overland to Almansa. Recently one single large
consignment of was material from Soviet Russia to the Reds in Spain
included 100 heavy tanks, 500 medium-sized tanks, 2000 light tanks,
4000 heavy machine guns, 6000 light machine guns and 300 aeroplanes,
with their pilots."
"I shall now deal with some instances which will help to give an
idea of the extent to which World Liberalism goes in its moral support
of the Reds in Spain. I have already emphasized the fact that the
marriage between Bolshevism and Democracy presents some uncanny
features; indeed one might call them downright perverse. In the
historical developement of its activities Democracy has more and more
become the political facade of World Capitalism. Bolshevism now
carries the democratic principle to its ultimate logical application.
We may call it the Democracy of Terror. It increases the pace of that
sanguinary and pitiless developement of which Liberalism had already
mapped out the path. I might illustrate this point by a rather drastic
comparison. In democracy leading heads were out-voted by the counting
of heads. In Bolshevism the same result is obtained by chopping off
heads with the guillotine. The result in both cases is the same. The
heads are wanting. The masses are robbed of their natural leaders and
left prey to international Jews, who are now free to exercise their
dictatorship by the employment of terrorization and money."
"Pleasing catchwords were used to win the favour of the
workers but when the communist leaders came into power social terror
became the rule of the day. Among the workers and peasant classes
hunger prevailed, as symbol and sign of the Bolshevic rule."
"In keeping with the Soviet Russian pettern, family life and
the instituton of marriage are being ruined by this world plague.
Degradation of married women, the socialization of women, the
martyrdom of children--these are the principles which are in vogue
here."
"According to the 'Daily Mail' of August 22, 1936, Twenty-eight
nuns from the convent of Santa Clara "were subjected to inconceivable
tortures by relays of red maniacs."
"But Bolshevism in practice is nothing better than the most
frightful find of barbarism. It is the outward expression of the
hatred of the underworld agianst all those who are representative of
Western civilization and a cultural level to which Bolshevism can
never hope to attain."
"Among the 20,000 churches and monasteries which the Reds have
plundered and destroyed many were of historical and architectual
significance which cannot be replaced."
"But the churches of the world remain passive to it all and do not
seem to have the least suspicion as to the deadly menace that
threatens them. This is where Bolshevism shows itself again as the
incarnation of evil. Its destructive influence on the popular
religious instinct goes to the very roots of that instinct itself. And
this ruthless atheistic campaign spares nothing whatsoever which might
serve to remind the people of God and religion. The one fact alone
that the Fuerer has saved the German churches from this fate should be
enough to make them feel bound to remain eternally thankful to him.
But instead of this they never tire of going beyond the sphere of
their religious duties, interfering in political matters and making
their influence felt in a way that has no connection whatsoever with
their duties or their divine calling."
"According to indisputable figures based exclusively on
Bolshevic statistics, 42,000 priests have been murdered in Russia. Up
to February 2,1937, approximately 17,000 priests and monks and eleven
bishops were murdered in Spain."
"A Swedish refugee stated, on November 10, 1936: 'I have seen
churches on the walls of which the murdered bodies of women were hung,
nuns that had been beheaded or burned and whose bodies had been nailed
in rows to the church walls."
"The Strassburg paper, 'Der Elsasser', in its issue of
February 27, 1937 published the staggering fact that '50,000 Spanish
children are at the present moment wandering through Spanish
provinces, abandoned and in rags. All public activities for the
welfare of the youth have been abolished. And so the youngsters, very
often no more than four or five years old, are left no alternative.
They stagger along the road in swarms, shivering with cold and are
nothing more than wandering skeletons.'"
"One shudders to think what might happen to humanity if this
system became universal throughout the world."
"Bolshevism and its 'friendly press' throughout the world lose no
opportunity of pointing an accusing finger at the alleged use of
terror in countries which are governed according to the principles of
authority. The whole world gives a cry of agonizing sympathy when, for
example, a Jew in Germany receives a well-earned box on the ears. But
what is this when compared with the terror that disrupts whole
nations"
"Lenin himself, when asked at the 12th Congress of the Red Party,
what were the principles on which Communism relied, answered: 'Murder,
destruction, not a stone to be left in place if its removal should be
to the advantage of the Revolution.'"
"The Jewish Soviet Ambassador in London finds it convenient to
express his moral indignation before the Non-Intervention Committee in
London. The world and the League of Nations are hypocritically
appealed to. Before these tribunals the Jew Litwinow-Finkelstein plays
the part of the civilised philistine and fills Europe with cries of
protest."
"The Intenational Brigades which are sent into action on the Red
Spanish front are commanded by Soviet officers. Their commander was
the Jew, General Kleber."
"We shall not be deterred from pointing to the Jew as the inspirer,
the instigator and the beneficiary of the dreadful catastrophe."
"At Barcelona he sits, in the person of Wladimer Bischitzki as
director of the international oragnization for the smuggling of arms
and munitions, comrades Lurje and Fuchs, of his own racial breed,
sitting by his side. His Paris agents are his racial compatriots,
Fratkin, Rosenfeld and Schapiro. At Hirtenberg in Austria their
collaborator is the Jew, Mandl. In Amsterdam the Jew, Wolf. In
Rotteerdam the Jews, Cohen, Gruenfeld, Kirsch, and Simon. In Denmark
the Jew, Moses Israel Diamant. In Prague the Jews, Kindler, Kahn,
Abter and Hithner. We know them all and we know them well."
"The fact that Western Liberalism closes its eyes to this evil
portent is only a sign of its almost childish naivety."
"A struggle for native land and liberty, for honour and family
and God and religion, for wife and child, for school and upbringing,
for order, moral principle, culture and civilization, for our lives
and our daily bread , has begun. In Germany it has already been
brought to a triumphant issue."
Firelock
> If the Arabs are so stupid and inefficient as the Zionists tell us,
> how was it when the Palestinians ran Palestine they never needed help
> from the U.S. or anyone else. The ran that state very well without a
> cent of assistance from any other place.
When did the Palestinians run Palestine "very well without a
cent of assistance from any other place"? When the Ottoman
Empire ran it (1516 to 1917)? When the British ran it
(1917 to 1948)?
--
Walt
Topaz
<firel...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>When did the Palestinians run Palestine "very well without a
>cent of assistance from any other place"? When the Ottoman
>Empire ran it (1516 to 1917)? When the British ran it
>(1917 to 1948)?
Michael Ejercito
> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:28:44 -0800 (PST), Firelock
>
>
> >When did the Palestinians run Palestine "very well without a
> >cent of assistance from any other place"? When the Ottoman
> >Empire ran it (1516 to 1917)? When the British ran it
> >(1917 to 1948)?
>
> "After the Second World War, shortly before the United Nations
> partition of Palestine into separate Jewish and non-Jewish areas, Jews
> still made up less than one-third of the population of Palestine. The
> 1946 British census counted 608,000 Jews out of a total population of
> 1,845,000. The great majority of these Jews were recent immigrants,
> whereas nearly all of the Arabs were natives who had roots in
> Palestine going back many generations. What the Jews had that the
> Palestinians didn't have, however, was a very substantial degree of
> control of the governments of the United States and the United
> Kingdom, and these two countries exerted a decisive influence on the
> policies of the United Nations.
>
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> Tiptoeing around Our Problems
> By Dr. William Pierce
>
Michael Ejercito
> at the National Socialist Party Congress, Nuernberg, 1937.
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> Dr Joseph Goebbels, Der Angriff, 21 January 1929.
>
> The Jew
is your superior.
Dave Heil
> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:28:44 -0800 (PST), Firelock
> <firel...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> When did the Palestinians run Palestine "very well without a
>> cent of assistance from any other place"? When the Ottoman
>> Empire ran it (1516 to 1917)? When the British ran it
>> (1917 to 1948)?
>
>
> "After the Second World War, shortly before the United Nations
> partition of Palestine into separate Jewish and non-Jewish areas, Jews
> still made up less than one-third of the population of Palestine. The
> 1946 British census counted 608,000 Jews out of a total population of
> 1,845,000. The great majority of these Jews were recent immigrants,
> whereas nearly all of the Arabs were natives who had roots in
> Palestine going back many generations.
Stuff it, Toupee. The Jews who came back to Israel had roots there
going back four or five thousand years. They owned it before the
Diaspora. They came back home to claim what was theirs.
> What the Jews had that the
> Palestinians didn't have, however, was a very substantial degree of
> control of the governments of the United States and the United
> Kingdom, and these two countries exerted a decisive influence on the
> policies of the United Nations.
You mean you can't or won't answer the question put to you:
"When did the Palestinians run Palestine 'very well without a
cent of assistance from any other place'? When the Ottoman
Empire ran it (1516 to 1917)? When the British ran it
(1917 to 1948)?"
> The result of this influence was the partition of Palestine in 1948
> into separate Jewish and non-Jewish areas, with the one-third of the
> population that was Jewish being awarded two-thirds of the land,
> including the most valuable areas.
The result, in the wake of what the Jewish people had gone through at
the hands of the Nazis you admire and defend, is the state of Israel.
People like *you* contributed to its creation. You have my permission
to blame yourself.
Dave Heil
>
> Here are quotes from a speech delivered by Dr. Joseph Goebbels
> at the National Socialist Party Congress, Nuernberg, 1937.
Goebbels? Little club-footed guy who murdered his wife and kids before
taking his own life just eight years later? Such desperation!
Dave Heil
> Tiptoeing around Our Problems
> By Dr. William Pierce
>
> "We've been talking about the very dangerous situation in the Middle
Doc, you ain't ever talkin' again. Whatsa matter? Cat got your tongue?
Topaz
Here is a quote from "The Battle for Berlin" by Joseph Goebbels:
We had no idea of the danger that threatened us then. I myself did not
yet know Marxism well enough to foresee the possible consequences. I
shrugged my shoulders as I read the dark prose of the red press and
awaited expectantly the decisive evening.
Around 8 p.m. we drove in an old rusty car from the city center to
Wedding. A cold gray mist hung under a starless sky. Our hearts were
bursting with impatience and expectation.
As we drove down M�llerstra�e it was already clear that the evening
did not bode well. Groups of dark figures stood on every street
corner. They apparently planned to teach our party members a bloody
lesson before they even got to the meeting.
Dark masses of people stood outside the Pharus Hall, expressing their
rage and hate with loud and impudent threats.
The leader of the protective forces cleared a way for us and reported
briefly that the hall had been packed since 7:15 p.m. and had been
closed by police. About two-thirds of the audience were Red Front
Fighters. That was what we wanted. There would be a decision. We were
ready to give it all we had.
Entering the hall, we encountered a warm, stiffling aroma of beer and
tobacco. The hall was hot. A lively roar of voices filled the hall.
People were packed in tightly. We reached the podium only with
difficulty.
No sooner was I recognized than hundreds of voices filled with rage
and revenge thundered in my ears: "Bloodhound! Murder of Workers!"
Those were the mildest words they shouted. But a welcoming group of
some party members and S.A. Men answered with passion. Excited battle
cries sounded from the platform. I saw immediately that we were a
minority, but a minority determined to fight, and therefore win.
It was still our custom then for an S.A. leader to chair all of the
party's public meetings. Here too. Tall as a tree he stood up front
and asked for silence with his upraised arm. That was easier said than
done. Mocking laughter was the answer. Insults flew toward the
platform from every corner of the room. People growled and screamed
and raged. There were world revolutionaries scattered about who
apparently had gained the courage they needed by drinking. It was
impossible to quiet the hall. The class-conscious proletariat had not
come to discuss but to fight, to break things up, to put an end to the
Fascist specter with callused workers' fists.
We were not uncertain, even for a moment. We also knew that if the
enemy did not succeed this time in what he had threatened, the future
success of the movement in Berlin was assured.
Fifteen or twenty S.A. and S.S. men stood before the platform in
uniforms and arm bands, an impudent and direct provocation to the Red
Front Fighters. Behind me was a select group of reliable people ready
at any moment to risk their lives to defend me from the onrushing red
mob with brutal force.
The Communists made an obvious mistake in their tactics. They had
scattered small groups throughout the hall, but clumped most of the
rest in the right rear of the hall. I recognized immediately that
there was the center of unrest, and if anything was to be done, we
first had to deal ruthlessly with them. Whenever the chair tried to
open the meeting, a dark chap stood up on a stool and shouted "Point
of Order!" Hundreds of others yelled the same after him.
If one takes from the mass their leader or also their seducer, they
are leaderless and easily controlled. Our tactic therefore was to
silence this cowardly troublemaker at any cost. He felt secure back
there, surrounded by his comrades. We tried to do this peacefully a
few times. The chair shouted over the uproar: "There will be
discussion afterward! But we determine the rules of order!"
That was an ineffective attempt at an unsuitable object. The screamer
wanted to throw the meeting into confusion by his endless shouts and
bring things to the boiling point. Then a general melee would result.
As our efforts to bring the meeting to order peacefully proved
unsuccessful, I took the head of the defensive forces to the side, and
immediately after groups of his men slipped through the thundering
Communist masses. Before the astonished and surprised Red Front troops
realized what was happening, our comrades had hauled the troublemaker
down from his stool and brought him through the raging crowd to the
podium. That was unexpected, but what followed was no surprise. A beer
glass flew through the air and crashed to the floor. That was the
signal for the first major meeting hall battle. Chairs were broken and
legs ripped from tables. Glasses and bottles suddenly appeared and all
hell broke loose. The battle raged for ten minutes. Glasses, bottles,
table and chair legs flew randomly through the air. A deafening roar
rose; the red beast was set free and wanted its victims.
At first it looked as if we were lost. The Communist attack was sudden
and explosive, completely unexpected. But soon the S.A. and S.S. men
distributed throughout the hall and in front of the platform recovered
from their surprise and counterattacked with bold courage. It quickly
became clear that although the Communist Party had masses behind it,
these masses became cowards when faced with a firmly disciplined and
determined opponent. They ran. In short order the red mob that had
come to break up our meeting had been driven from the hall. The order
that could not be secured by good will was gained by brute force.
Usually one is not aware of the stages of a meeting hall battle. Only
later does one recall them. I still remember a scene that I will never
forget; on the podium stood a young S.A. man whom I did not know. He
was hurling his missiles into the on-coming red mob. Suddenly a beer
glass thrown from the distance hit him on the head. A wide stream of
blood ran down his face. He sank with a cry. After a few seconds he
stood up again, grabbed water bottle from the table and threw it into
the hall, where it clattered against the head of an opponent.
The face of this young man is engraved in my memory. This
lightening-fast moment is unforgettable. This gravely-wounded S.A. man
would soon, and indeed for all times, become my most reliable and
loyal comrade.
Only after the red mob had been driven howling, growling and cursing
from the field could one tell how serious and costly the battle had
been. Ten lay in their blood on the platform, most with head injuries,
two with severe concussions. The table and stairs to the platform were
covered in blood. The whole hall resembled a field of ruins.
In the midst of this bloody and ruined wasteland, our tree-high S.A.
leader resumed his place and declared with iron calm: "The meeting
will continue. The speaker has the floor."
Never before or since have I spoken under such dramatic conditions.
Behind me, groaning in pain and bleeding, were seriously injured S.A.
comrades. Around me were broken chair legs, shattered beer glasses and
blood. The whole meeting was icily silent.
We lacked then a medical corps. Since we were in a proletarian
district, we had to have our seriously wounded carried out by
so-called worker volunteers. There were scenes outdoors of
unimaginable inhumanity. The bestial people who were supposedly
fighting for universal brotherhood insulted our poor and defenseless
injured with phases like: "Isn't that pig dead yet?"
Under such conditions it was impossible to give a coherent speech.
Scarcely had I begun to speak when another group of volunteers entered
the hall to carry off a seriously wounded S.A. man on a stretcher. One
of them, encountering the brutal apostles of humanity outside the door
and their unflattering and crude language, shouted for me in
desperation. His voice could be heard loudly and unmistakably on the
platform I interrupted my speech and went through the hall, where
there were still scattered Communist commando groups. Still surprised
by what had happened, they stood quietly and shyly to the side. I bade
farewell to the seriously wounded S.A. comrades.
Topaz
German leaders believed in death before dishonor. They knew the
allies were subhuman monsters:
The Diaries of Charles A. Lindbergh, p.986
"That young girl riding on her bicycle - she must know that on the
day the Russians come she will probably be raped by a dozen soldiers.
When do they come? In days? In weeks? That, we have not told the
Germans. She has a good face - nicely dressed in old but clean and
brightly colored garments - like the daughter of a middle class
American family. I realize that we Americans are holding her at
Dessau. She cannot flee to safety.
We will not let her pass our sentries on the roads. We are turning her
and thousands of
others like her over to the Soviet soldiers for their sport. I feel
ashamed."
p.961
"German children look in through the window. We have more food than
we need, but regulations prevent giving it to them. It is difficult to
look at them. I feel ashamed of myself, of my people, as I eat and
watch those children. They are not to blame for the war. They are
hungry children. What right have we to stuff ourselves while they look
on - well-fed men eating, leaving unwanted food on plates, while
hungry children look on."
Berlin Correspondent, The Times, September 10th, 1945
"...Another small boy turned out of Danzig had a scrawled postcard
attached to him stating that his soldier father was long since missing
and that his mother and two sisters had died of hunger."
At this time, Denmark, formerly occupied by the Germans as a means
of denying the allies a North Sea bridgehead was bursting at the seams
with surplus food and was pleading with the allies to put it to good
use. It was refused.
Topaz
The Old Testament does say that God likes one race of people more than
others. It calls this race the Israelites. Nature wants the most
advanced and evolved race to take over. This is obviously the White
race. Compare Europe to Africa.
This is the definition of the word "adam" in Strong's Concordance:
"to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy:- be
(dyed, made) red (ruddy)."
This can only be describing a White man. Look at people today
and see which ones have rosy red cheeks. They are light skinned White
people.
The Bible says David was ruddy. This is the definition of the
Hebrew word "ruddy":
"reddish (of the hair or of the complexion):-red, ruddy."
David had rosy cheeks (or red hair) and did not look like a
typical Jew.
The original Israelites were White people.
Jews are like the American Indians of today. These people say they
are Indians but the original Indians were clearly described as having
red skin. Today Indians may look brown or white, but not red. Neither
are Jews like the original Israelites.
The religious leaders of the Jews were the Pharisees. Jesus
condemned them in the harshest words.
Matthew 23:33 "Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye
escape the damnation of hell?"
The New Jewish Encyclopedia, edited by David Bridger, PH.D in
association with Samual Wolk, Rabbi, J.S.D, copyright 1962, Published
by Behrman House, inc.,1261 Broadway, New York 1, N.Y., Library of
Congress Catalog Card Number: 62-17079, says on page 376:
"The Pharisees are therefore regarded as those authorities who helped
develop and preserve traditional Judaism as it is known today."
The old drawing of Jesus were probably correct. He probably had blond
hair and blue eyes.
John 7:1 "After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would
not walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him."
John 20:19 "the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled
for fear of the Jews"
2 Co 11:24 "Of the Jews five times recieved I forty stripes save
one. Thrice was I beaten with rods, once was I stoned"
Mathew 27: 20+25 "But the chief priests and the elders persuaded the
multitude that they should ask Barabbas, and destroy Jesus...then
answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our
children."
Acts 25:24 "ye see this man, about whom all the multitude of the Jews
have dealt with me, both at Jerusalem and also here, crying that he
ought not to live any longer."
John 8:42,44,48 "Jesus said unto them...Ye are of your father the
devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from
the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth
in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a
liar, and the father of it...Then answered the Jews..."
Topaz
Topaz
Here are some quotes from "With Hitler on the Road to Power" by Dr.
Otto Dietrich
The "Dritte Reich" stands firm. It rests on its foundations, on the
immortal values of the Nordic Race, and in the depth of Germany's
soul.
We call Adolf Hitler our "Leader" (Fuehrer), because that is what he
is. He united State and Nation in Germany.
Only the eye-witness, who has experienced day by day, at the side of
Adolf Hitler, the wave of love and enthusiasm which greets him from
every class of German, can realize that such ovations, so rare in the
life of statesmen, signify no artificial feeling, but genuine
affection.. Hundreds, thousands throng the streets and roads, and
surge toward his car.. The scenes which we witness day by day are
touching and heart-rending. They are not isolated examples, but occur
everywhere.
The history of the National Socialist Movement shall be handed down to
posterity as the epic of the resurrected German Nation.
With indomitable will and unprecedented perseverance, which no
reverse can dishearten, this previously unknown man of the people,
with a few faithful adherents, dared to pierce the lines of the
Marxist terror.. He knows; terror is not overcome by intellect, but by
terror.
Adolf Hitler was not permitted to speak in public. The party lacked
the most essential means. It's existence during the following years -
probably the most arduous of its life - was one long series of
persecutions, muzzling, and trickery. Whoever admitted National
Socialism, was banished from civil life, from the decadent bourgeoisie
and from the class-conscious workers. The mere suspicion of National
Socialism meant the loss of employment and bread, boycott and ruin of
business interests, the inevitable acceptance of misery.
Hundreds, thousands were imprisoned by the November State Government.
Throughout the streets raged bloodshed and scenes of Marxist terror.
All the powers of hell were let loose against the advancing young
movement.
After twelve years of inconceivably laborious preparation, the
N.S.D.A.P. felt strong enough to knock at the door of power in the
Reich
But strong elements of economic opposition were still prevalent, and
these he attacked at the beginning of 1932.
Even today, I can picture this meeting of prominent men. We came for
Godesberg, and drove up to the Park Hotel, amidst the hooting of the
Marxists. The room was over crowded. Huddled together, sat the chief
West German magnates. There were familiar and unfamiliar faces. Men in
the public eye , and those quiet , but no less influential powers,
who, moving behind the scenes, control the fate of economy by the soft
sounds issuing from their private offices- men said to bear a ledger
rather than a heart.
Joyful expectation brightened the faces of those already converted.
But the vast majority bore an air of superiority and cool reserve-
probably flattered that Hitler had approached them. Mere curiosity,
and general interest lured them to the meeting. They wanted to hear
Hitler speak. They had no intention of being converted; the came to
criticize, seeking confirmation of their own infallible opinion.
Our leader received a chilly ovation; he spoke from a slightly raised,
projecting balustrade, he hands resting lightly on the iron railing. I
sat, amongst the listeners, taking notes, and observing the effect of
his speech which lasted for over two hours. From world political
perspective and with cogent logic, out leader elucidated the relations
between economy and politics, their reciprocal effect, and their
results in Germany. He explained the cause of the situation , and
proposed the only possible remedy.
The general impression upon this group of most impassive listeners was
astounding. After an hour, their chilly reserve gave way to intense
interest. Hitler spoke of the titanic struggle of his political
warriors, needy and persecuted, but making every sacrifice, even that
of life, for their nation. He contrasted the German youth's unselfish
idealism, personified in National Socialism, and the noble character
of working-class followers, with the lack of comprehension, the
materialism, and the heavy guilt of the purely economically
established Bourgeoisie. He pricked their social conscience without
causing offence.
They began to flush, fixed their gaze upon out Leader's lips, and it
seemed as if their hearts were moved. He spoke to their very souls.
Faint, then thundering applause greeted Hitler at the conclusion of
his speech; he had won a battle.
The Jewish and Marxist Press lied boldly next day that Hitler had
feasted with the industrial magnates on champagne and lobsters.
Actually, a few minutes later, the night say us on the road again,
bent on fresh work.
Next day, Hitler addressed with equal success the Crefeld Silk
magnates in Godesberg. Later the national club in Hamburg. Everywhere,
the scene was the same.
Those were daring journeys, fraught with danger, through the very
strongholds of the Marxist potentates who were on the track of their
hated, sworn foe.
But Adolf Hitler fought his way through. The number-plate of his car
was smeared with oil and coated with dust- quite indiscernible.
Then we held our first meeting in Goerlitz, where the attendance
exceeded the hundred thousand figure. All the roads were crowed with
masses of people on foot, on bicycles, and in lorries, all with the
same destination.
Hitler spoke as the stars arose in the heavens, and amidst the flaring
torches.
Now the crowds recognized the luminous plane carrying our leader, who
had just devoted his time to them. Cheers broke out from a hundred
thousand throats, drowning even the thunder of our motors, whilst the
crowds brandished flaming torches in greeting.
We have experienced the following fact; In Germany, wherever economic
and moral distress was greatest, wherever things seemed most
intolerable, there, confidence in our leader was strongest, and
gripped all the people.
Wherever our leader approached, every man and woman came out. Crowds
lined the streets. Aged grandmothers, on whose distressed faces the
direst poverty was written, raised their arms in greeting. Wherever we
stopped, the women stretched out their children towards our leader.
There were tears of joy and emotion.
They used to meet upon the Platterhof. Adolf Hitler would often come
in the night fog to the Platterhof, to take counsel with his friends.
The "Conservative State Idea" appropriated our ideas. The most ancient
political mummies of the past suddenly appeared upon the scene, and,
without shame, claimed the credit for out previous successes.
The Youth stood by Hitler, because it knew that he personified the
Nation's Youth. From the beginning, our leader had valued most highly
the immense importance of Youth for the movement. Not the old
generation, but a rising generation, uncorrupted by the destructive
poison of the world ideas of the ruling classes, could bear the new
Germany upon its shoulders.
Finally, on 30th January, 1933, our leader made the short drive over
the Wilhelmsplatz to the Reichskanzler's Office. Amidst boundless
cheers. The seige was over, the fortress had fallen, the gates lay
open.
The political lie had played a prominent role in all epochs of
parliamentary history. But such accumulations of lies and defamations
as our opponents have hurled against the awakening young Germany in
the course of our 13 years' struggle have not been experienced.
What National Socialist's blood does not boil, if he recalls the rapid
fire of press lies, that witches Sabbath of infernal songs of hatred,
which burst upon the National Socialist Movement every day?
The activity of the Marxist Press against National Socialism, by means
of profligacy, unscrupulous lies and base agitation of the public,
stands unrivalled throughout the press of the whole world.
But this systematic lying campaign of our opponents was always the
best evidence of the moral weakness of their own position. The more
desperate their situation was, the more unscrupulous became their
press agitation.
The agitation of the Jewish-Marxist Press against the N.S.D.A.P., has
been such an essential ingredient of our opponents' struggle during
all these years, that we would be guilty of historical forgery if we
did not lay due stress upon this lying campaign in our description of
the events.
The National Socialist Party has re-united people and State, it has
restored the people to the State, and the State to the people. In this
way, an organism, complete within itself, and comprising every
function of the life of the community, was born from the Nation
itself, in the midst of a decadent people and a corrupt State.
In Nuremberg, the Party represented the German people and the German
State, before the eyes of the whole world. This was a more complete, a
more morally dignified, and a more imposing representation than the
State and Nation have ever previously enjoyed.
If proves the recognition that a new valuation of men, a valuation
based upon the laws of nature, is beginning to force its way through
from the hearts of the European Nations. It is about to overcome
Liberalism, and replace it by a new conception of the living
community.
The democratic, parliamentary Liberalism apodictically claimed for
itself the eternal title of the most purposeful and best form of
representation of the peoples rights. At last with its own eyes, the
Nation has recognized National Socialism as the organization of
naturally chosen leaders. National Socialism's achievements in the
fields of Socialism, Economy, Administration, and Reformation of the
Reich, speak for themselves. In one sweep, these leaders have
accomplished what dozens of previous parliamentary, democratic
governments vainly attempted in the most deplorable way.
Probably it is an act of justice and compensation, that the German
Nation, so sorely afflicted by the world-war, is chosen to lead the
way to a better future for the nations.
Michael Ejercito
> German leaders believed in death before dishonor.
>They knew the
> allies were subhuman monsters:
Their Japanese allies?
Certainly.
Read about the Rape of Nanking and Unit 731.
Michael
Dave Heil
> The Old Testament does say that God likes one race of people more than
> others. It calls this race the Israelites. Nature wants the most
> advanced and evolved race to take over. This is obviously the White
> race. Compare Europe to Africa.
I'd rather take a moment to compare you to other white folks. You're a
half-bubble off. No rational being believes that the Israelites of the
Bible are European whites.
Fat, tattooed skinheas, prancing around in their Nazi regalia aren't the
chosen people.
Dave Heil
> German leaders believed in death before dishonor.
Nazi leaders surrendered in huge numbers. They sold out for coffee,
cigarettes, chocolate and food. So much for honor.
Michael Ejercito
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> Here is a quote from "The Battle for Berlin" by Joseph Goebbels:
>
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> German leaders believed in death before dishonor.
And yet they ended up dishonored AND dead.
>They knew the
> allies were subhuman monsters:
Their Japanese allies?
Michael Ejercito
> Here are some quotes from "With Hitler on the Road to Power" by Dr.
> Otto Dietrich
>
> The "Dritte Reich" stands firm. It rests on its foundations, on the
> immortal values of the Nordic Race, and in the depth of Germany's
> soul.
It lay in ruins in 1945.
> We call Adolf Hitler our "Leader" (Fuehrer), because that is what he
> is. He united State and Nation in Germany.
>
He led Germany to ruin.
Michael
Topaz
THERE IS NO GREATER POWER in the world today than that wielded by the
manipulators of public opinion in America. No king or pope of old, no
conquering general or high priest ever disposed of a power even
remotely approaching that of the few dozen men who control America's
mass media of news and entertainment.
Their power is not distant and impersonal; it reaches into every home
in America, and it works its will during nearly every waking hour. It
is the power that shapes and molds the mind of virtually every
citizen, young or old, rich or poor, simple or sophisticated.
The mass media form for us our image of the world and then tell us
what to think about that image. Essentially everything we know-or
think we know-about events outside our own neighborhood or circle of
acquaintances comes to us via our daily newspaper, our weekly news
magazine, our radio, or our television.
It is not just the heavy-handed suppression of certain news stories
from our newspapers or the blatant propagandizing of
history-distorting TV "docudramas" that characterizes the
opinion-manipulating techniques of the media masters. They exercise
both subtlety and thoroughness in their management of the news and the
entertainment that they present to us.
For example, the way in which the news is covered: which items are
emphasized and which are played down; the reporter's choice of words,
tone of voice, and facial expressions; the wording of headlines; the
choice of illustrations-all of these things subliminally and yet
profoundly affect the way in which we interpret what we see or hear.
On top of this, of course, the columnists and editors remove any
remaining doubt from our minds as to just what we are to think about
it all. Employing carefully developed psychological techniques, they
guide our thought and opinion so that we can be in tune with the "in"
crowd, the "beautiful people," the "smart money." They let us know
exactly what our attitudes should be toward various types of people
and behavior by placing those people or that behavior in the context
of a TV drama or situation comedy and having the other TV characters
react in the Politically Correct way.
Molding American Minds
For example, a racially mixed couple will be respected, liked, and
socially sought after by other characters, as will a "take charge"
Black scholar or businessman, or a sensitive and talented homosexual,
or a poor but honest and hardworking illegal alien from Mexico. On the
other hand, a White racist-that is, any racially conscious White
person who looks askance at miscegenation or at the rapidly darkening
racial situation in America-is portrayed, at best, as a despicable
bigot who is reviled by the other characters, or, at worst, as a
dangerous psychopath who is fascinated by firearms and is a menace to
all law-abiding citizens. The White racist "gun nut," in fact, has
become a familiar stereotype on TV shows.
The average American, of whose daily life TV-watching takes such an
unhealthy portion, distinguishes between these fictional situations
and reality only with difficulty, if at all. He responds to the
televised actions, statements, and attitudes of TV actors much as he
does to his own peers in real life. For all too many Americans the
real world has been replaced by the false reality of the TV
environment, and it is to this false reality that his urge to conform
responds. Thus, when a TV scriptwriter expresses approval of some
ideas and actions through the TV characters for whom he is writing,
and disapproval of others, he exerts a powerful pressure on millions
of viewers toward conformity with his own views.
And as it is with TV entertainment, so it is also with the news,
whether televised or printed. The insidious thing about this form of
thought control is that even when we realize that entertainment or
news is biased, the media masters still are able to manipulate most of
us. This is because they not only slant what they present, but also
they establish tacit boundaries and ground rules for the permissible
spectrum of opinion.
As an example, consider the media treatment of Middle East news. Some
editors or commentators are slavishly pro-Israel in their every
utterance, while others seem nearly neutral. No one, however, dares
suggest that the U.S. government is backing the wrong side in the
Arab-Jewish conflict, or that 9-11 was a result of that support. Nor
does anyone dare suggest that it served Jewish interests, rather than
American interests, to send U.S. forces to cripple Iraq, Israel's
principal rival in the Middle East. Thus, a spectrum of permissible
opinion, from pro-Israel to nearly neutral, is established.
Another example is the media treatment of racial issues in the United
States. Some commentators seem almost dispassionate in reporting news
of racial strife, while others are emotionally partisan-with the
partisanship always on the non-White side. All of the media spokesmen
without exception, however, take the position that "multiculturalism"
and racial mixing are here to stay and that they are good things.
Because there are differences in degree, however, most Americans fail
to realize that they are being manipulated. Even the citizen who
complains about "managed news" falls into the trap of thinking that
because he is presented with an apparent spectrum of opinion he can
escape the thought controllers' influence by believing the editor or
commentator of his choice. It's a "heads I win, tails you lose"
situation. Every point on the permissible spectrum of public opinion
is acceptable to the media masters-and no impermissible fact or
viewpoint is allowed any exposure at all, if they can prevent it.
The control of the opinion-molding media is nearly monolithic. All of
the controlled media-television, radio, newspapers, magazines, books,
motion pictures-speak with a single voice, each reinforcing the other.
Despite the appearance of variety, there is no real dissent, no
alternative source of facts or ideas accessible to the great mass of
people that might allow them to form opinions at odds with those of
the media masters. They are presented with a single view of the
world-a world in which every voice proclaims the equality of the
races, the inerrant nature of the Jewish "Holocaust" tale, the
wickedness of attempting to halt the flood of non-White aliens pouring
across our borders, the danger of permitting citizens to keep and bear
arms, the moral equivalence of all sexual orientations, and the
desirability of a "pluralistic," cosmopolitan society rather than a
homogeneous, White one. It is a view of the world designed by the
media masters to suit their own ends-and the pressure to conform to
that view is overwhelming. People adapt their opinions to it, vote in
accord with it, and shape their lives to fit it.
And who are these all-powerful masters of the media? As we shall see,
to a very large extent they are Jews. It isn't simply a matter of the
media being controlled by profit-hungry capitalists, some of whom
happen to be Jews. If that were the case, the ethnicity of the media
masters would reflect, at least approximately, the ratio of rich
Gentiles to rich Jews. Despite a few prominent exceptions, the
preponderance of Jews in the media is so overwhelming that we are
obliged to assume that it is due to more than mere happenstance.
Electronic News & Entertainment Media
Continuing government deregulation of the telecommunications industry
has resulted, not in the touted increase of competition, but rather in
an accelerating wave of corporate mergers and acquisitions that have
produced a handful of multi-billion-dollar media conglomerates. The
largest of these conglomerates are rapidly growing even bigger by
consuming their competition, almost tripling in size during the 1990s.
Whenever you watch television, whether from a local broadcasting
station or via cable or a satellite dish; whenever you see a feature
film in a theater or at home; whenever you listen to the radio or to
recorded music; whenever you read a newspaper, book, or magazine-it is
very likely that the information or entertainment you receive was
produced and/or distributed by one of these megamedia companies:
Time Warner. The largest media conglomerate today is Time Warner
(briefly called AOL-Time Warner; the AOL was dropped from the name
when accounting practices at the AOL division were questioned by
government investigators), which reached its current form when America
Online bought Time Warner for $160 billion in 2000. The combined
company had revenue of $39.5 billion in 2003. The merger brought
together Steve Case, a Gentile, as chairman of AOL-Time Warner, and
Gerald Levin, a Jew, as the CEO. Warner, founded by the Jewish Warner
brothers in the early part of the last century, rapidly became part of
the Jewish power base in Hollywood, a fact so well-known that it is
openly admitted by Jewish authors, as is the fact that each new media
acquisition becomes dominated by Jews in turn: Speaking of the initial
merger of Time, Inc. with Warner, Jewish writer Michael Wolff said in
New York magazine in 2001 "since Time Inc.'s merger with Warner ten
years ago, one of the interesting transitions is that it has become a
Jewish company." ("From AOL to W," New York magazine, January 29,
2001)
The third most powerful man at AOL-Time Warner, at least on paper, was
Vice Chairman Ted Turner, a White Gentile. Turner had traded his
Turner Broadcasting System, which included CNN, to Time Warner in 1996
for a large block of Time Warner shares. By April 2001 Levin had
effectively fired Ted Turner, eliminating him from any real power.
However, Turner remained a very large and outspoken shareholder and
member of the board of directors.
Levin overplayed his hand, and in a May 2002 showdown, he was fired by
the company's board. For Ted Turner, who had lost $7 billion of his $9
billion due to Levin's mismanagement, it was small solace. Turner
remains an outsider with no control over the inner workings of the
company. Also under pressure, Steve Case resigned effective in May
2003. The board replaced both Levin and Case with a Black, Richard
Parsons. Behind Parsons the Jewish influence and power remains
dominant.
AOL is the largest Internet service provider in the world, with 34
million U.S. subscribers. It is now being used as an online platform
for the Jewish content from Time Warner. Jodi Kahn and Meg Siesfeld,
both Jews, lead the Time Inc. Interactive team under executive editor
Ned Desmond, a White Gentile. All three report to Time Inc.
editor-in-chief Norman Pearlstine, a Jew. Their job is to transfer
Time Warner's content to target specific segments of America Online's
audience, especially women, children, and teens.
Time Warner was already the second largest of the international media
leviathans when it merged with AOL. Time Warner's subsidiary HBO (26
million subscribers) is the nation's largest pay-TV cable network.
HBO's "competitor" Cinemax is another of Time Warner's many cable
ventures.
Until the purchase in May 1998 of PolyGram by Jewish billionaire Edgar
Bronfman, Jr., Warner Music was America's largest record company, with
50 labels. Warner Music was an early promoter of "gangsta rap."
Through its involvement with Interscope Records (prior to Interscope's
acquisition by another Jewish-owned media firm), it helped to
popularize a genre whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge Blacks to
commit acts of violence against Whites. Bronfman purchased Warner
Music in 2004, keeping it solidly in Jewish hands.
In addition to cable and music, Time Warner is heavily involved in the
production of feature films (Warner Brothers Studio, Castle Rock
Entertainment, and New Line Cinema). Time Warner's publishing division
is managed by its editor-in-chief, Norman Pearlstine, a Jew. He
controls 50 magazines including Time, Life, Sports Illustrated, and
People. Book publishing ventures include Time-Life Books,
Book-of-the-Month Club, Little Brown, and many others. Time Warner
also owns Shoutcast and Winamp, the very tools that most independent
Internet radio broadcasters rely on, and, as a dominant player in the
Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), was essentially
"negotiating" with itself when Internet radio music royalty rules were
set that strongly favored large content providers and forced many
small broadcasters into silence. (The Register, "AOL Time Warner takes
grip of net radio," 8th April 2003)
Ted Turner's Lesson: "Be very careful with whom you merge."
When Ted Turner, the Gentile media maverick, made a bid to buy CBS in
1985, there was panic in the media boardrooms across the country.
Turner had made a fortune in advertising and then built a successful
cable-TV news network, CNN, with over 70 million subscribers.
Although Turner had never taken a stand contrary to Jewish interests,
he was regarded by William Paley and the other Jews at CBS as
uncontrollable: a loose cannon who might at some time in the future
turn against them. Furthermore, Jewish newsman Daniel Schorr, who had
worked for Turner, publicly charged that his former boss held a
personal dislike for Jews.
To block Turner's bid, CBS executives invited billionaire Jewish
theater, hotel, insurance, and cigarette magnate Laurence Tisch to
launch a "friendly" takeover of CBS. From 1986 to 1995 Tisch was the
chairman and CEO of CBS, removing any threat of non-Jewish influence
there. Subsequent efforts by Ted Turner to acquire CBS were obstructed
by Gerald Levin's Time Warner, which owned nearly 20 percent of CBS
stock and had veto power over major deals. But when his fellow Jew
Sumner Redstone offered to buy CBS for $34.8 billion in 1999, Levin
had no objections.
Thus, despite being an innovator and garnering headlines, Turner never
commanded the "connections" necessary for being a media master. He
finally decided if you can't lick 'em, join 'em, and he sold out to
Levin's Time Warner. Ted Turner summed it up:
"I've had an incredible life for the most part. I made a lot of smart
moves, and I made a lot of money. Then something happened, and I
merged with Time Warner, which looked like the right thing to do at
the time. And it was good for shareholders.
"But then I lost control. I thought I would have enough moral
authority to have all the influence in the new company. If you go into
business, be very careful with whom you merge.
"I thought I was buying Time Warner, but they were buying me. We had
kind of a difference in viewpoint. Then they merged with AOL, and that
was a complete disaster, at least so far. I have lost 85 percent of my
wealth."
Disney. The second-largest media conglomerate today, with 2003
revenues of $27.1 billion, is the Walt Disney Company. Its leading
personality and CEO, Michael Eisner, is a Jew.
The Disney empire, headed by a man described by one media analyst as a
"control freak," includes several television production companies
(Walt Disney Television, Touchstone Television, Buena Vista
Television) and cable networks with more than 100 million subscribers
altogether. As for feature films, the Walt Disney Motion Pictures
Group includes Walt Disney Pictures, Touchstone Pictures, Hollywood
Pictures, and Caravan Pictures. Disney also owns Miramax Films, run by
the Jewish Weinstein brothers, Bob and Harvey, who have produced such
ultra-raunchy movies as The Crying Game, Priest, and Kids.
When the Disney Company was run by the Gentile Disney family prior to
its takeover by Eisner in 1984, it epitomized wholesome family
entertainment. While it still holds the rights to Snow White, the
company under Eisner has expanded into the production of a great deal
of so-called "adult" material.
In August 1995, Eisner acquired Capital Cities/ABC, Inc., which owns
the ABC television network, which in turn owns ten TV stations
outright in such big markets as New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Los
Angeles, San Francisco, and Houston. In addition, in the United States
ABC has 225 affiliated TV stations, over 2,900 affiliated radio
stations and produces over 7,200 radio programs. ABC owns 54 radio
stations and operates 57 radio stations, many in major cities such as
New York, Washington, and Los Angeles. Radio Disney, part of ABC Radio
Networks, provides programming targeting children.
Sports network ESPN, an ABC cable subsidiary, is headed by President
and CEO George W. Bodenheimer, who is a Jew. The corporation also
controls the Disney Channel, Toon Disney, A&E, Lifetime Television,
SOAPnet and the History Channel, with between 86 and 88 million
subscribers each. The ABC Family television network has 84 million
subscribers and, in addition to broadcasting entertainment (some of it
quite raunchy for a "family" channel), is also the network outlet for
Christian Zionist TV evangelist Pat Robertson.
Although primarily a telecommunications company, ABC/Disney earns over
$1 billion in publishing, owning Walt Disney Company Book Publishing,
Hyperion Books, and Miramax Books. It also owns six daily newspapers
and publishes over 20 magazines. Disney Publishing Worldwide publishes
books and magazines in 55 languages in 74 countries, reaching more
than 100 million readers each month
On the Internet, Disney runs Buena Vista Internet Group, ABC Internet
Group, ABC.com, ABCNEWS.com, Oscar.com, Mr. Showbiz, Disney Online,
Disney's Daily Blast, Disney.com, Family.com, ESPN Internet Group,
ESPN.sportzone.com, Soccernet.com, NFL.com, NBA.com, Infoseek (partial
ownership), and Disney Interactive.
Viacom. Number three on the list, with 2003 revenues of just over
$26.5 billion, is Viacom, Inc., headed by Sumner Redstone (born Murray
Rothstein), a Jew. Melvin A. Karmazin, another Jew, was number two at
Viacom until June 2004, holding the positions of president and chief
operating officer. Karmazin remains a large Viacom shareholder.
Replacing Karmazin as co-presidents and co-COOs are a Jew, Leslie
Moonves, and Tom Freston, a possible Jew. (We have been unable to
confirm Freston's Jewish ancestry; he has done work for Jewish
organizations and was involved in the garment trade, a heavily Jewish
industry, importing clothing from the Third World to the U.S. in the
1970s.)
Viacom produces and distributes TV programs for the three largest
networks, owns 39 television stations outright with another 200
affiliates in its wholly-owned CBS Television Network, owns 185 radio
stations in its Infinity radio group, and has over 1,500 affiliated
stations through its CBS Radio Network. It produces feature films
through Paramount Pictures, headed by Jewess Sherry Lansing (born
Sherry Lee Heimann), who is planning to retire at the end of 2005.
Viacom was formed in 1971 as a way to dodge an anti-monopoly FCC
ruling that required CBS to spin off a part of its cable TV operations
and syndicated programming business. This move by the government
unfortunately did nothing to reduce the mostly Jewish collaborative
monopoly that remains the major problem with the industry. In 1999,
after CBS had again augmented itself by buying King World Productions
(a leading TV program syndicator), Viacom acquired its progenitor
company, CBS, in a double mockery of the spirit of the 1971 ruling.
Redstone acquired CBS following the December 1999 stockholders' votes
at CBS and Viacom. CBS Television has long been headed by the
previously mentioned Leslie Moonves; the other Viacom co-president,
Tom Freston, headed wholly-owned MTV.
Viacom also owns the Country Music Television and The Nashville
Network cable channels and is the largest outdoor advertising
(billboards, etc.) entity in the U.S. Viacom's publishing division
includes Simon & Schuster, Scribner, The Free Press, Fireside, and
Archway Paperbacks. It distributes videos through its over 8,000
Blockbuster stores. It is also involved in satellite broadcasting,
theme parks, and video games.
Viacom's chief claim to fame, however, is as the world's largest
provider of cable programming through its Showtime, MTV, Nickelodeon,
Black Entertainment Television, and other networks. Since 1989 MTV and
Nickelodeon have acquired larger and larger shares of the juvenile
television audience. MTV dominates the television market for viewers
between the ages of 12 and 24.
Sumner Redstone owns 76 per cent of the shares of Viacom. He offers
Jackass as a teen role model and pumps MTV's racially mixed rock and
rap videos into 342 million homes in 140 countries and is a dominant
cultural influence on White teenagers around the world. MTV also makes
race-mixing movies like Save the Last Dance.
Nickelodeon, with over 87 million subscribers, has by far the largest
share of the four-to-11-year-old TV audience in America and is
expanding rapidly into Europe. Most of its shows do not yet display
the blatant degeneracy that is MTV's trademark, but Redstone is
gradually nudging the fare presented to his kiddie viewers toward the
same poison purveyed by MTV. Nickelodeon continues a 12-year streak as
the top cable network for children and younger teenagers.
NBC Universal. Another Jewish media mogul is Edgar Bronfman, Jr. He
headed Seagram Company, Ltd., the liquor giant, until its recent
merger with Vivendi. His father, Edgar Bronfman, Sr., is president of
the World Jewish Congress.
Seagram owned Universal Studios and later purchased Interscope
Records, the foremost promoter of "gangsta rap," from Warner.
Universal and Interscope now belong to Vivendi Universal, which merged
with NBC in May 2004, with the parent company now called NBC
Universal.
Bronfman became the biggest man in the record business in May 1998
when he also acquired control of PolyGram, the European record giant,
by paying $10.6 billion to the Dutch electronics manufacturer Philips.
In June 2000, the Bronfman family traded Seagram to Vivendi for stock
in Vivendi, and Edgar, Jr. became vice chairman of Vivendi. Vivendi
was originally a French utilities company, and was then led by Gentile
Jean-Marie Messier. A board of directors faction led by Bronfman
forced Messier to resign in July 2002.
Vivendi also acquired bisexual Jew Barry Diller's USA Networks in
2002. (Diller is the owner of InterActive Corporation, which owns
Expedia, Ticketmaster, The Home Shopping Network, Lending Tree,
Hotels.com, CitySearch, Evite, Match.com, and other Internet
businesses.) Vivendi combined the USA Network, Universal Studios,
Universal Television, and theme parks into Vivendi Universal
Entertainment (VUE).
After the Vivendi-NBC merger, Bronfman used his considerable personal
profits to strike out on his own, and recently purchased Warner Music
from Jewish-dominated Time Warner. The current chairman of NBC
Universal is a Gentile often associated with Jewish causes, long-time
NBC employee Bob Wright. Ron Meyer, a Jew, is president and chief
operating officer of Universal Studios. Stacey Snider, also Jewish, is
the chairman of Universal Pictures. The president of NBC Universal
Television Group is Jeff Zucker, another Jew.
With two of the top four media conglomerates in the hands of Jews
(Disney and Viacom), with Jewish executives running the media
operations of NBC Universal, and with Jews filling a large proportion
of the executive jobs at Time Warner, it is unlikely that such an
overwhelming degree of control came about without a deliberate,
concerted effort on the Jews' part.
Other media companies: Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation owns Fox
Television Network, Fox News, the FX Channel, 20th Century Fox Films,
Fox 2000, and publisher Harper Collins. News Corp. is the fifth
largest megamedia corporation in the nation, with 2003 revenues of
approximately $19.2 billion. It is the only other media company which
comes close to the top four.
Its Fox News Channel has been a key outlet pushing the Jewish
neoconservative agenda that lies behind the Iraq War and which
animates both the administration of George W. Bush and the "new
conservatism" that embraces aggressive Zionism and multiracialism.
Murdoch is nominally a Gentile, but there is some uncertainty about
his ancestry and he has vigorously supported Zionism and other Jewish
causes throughout his life. (Historian David Irving has published
information from a claimed high-level media source who says that
Murdoch's mother, Elisabeth Joy Greene, was Jewish, but we have not
been able to confirm this.) Murdoch's number two executive is Peter
Chernin, who is president and chief operating officer-and a Jew.
Under Chernin, Jews hold key positions in the company: Gail Berman
runs Fox Entertainment Group; Mitchell Stern heads satellite
television division DirecTV; Jane Friedman is chairman and CEO of
Harper Collins; and Thomas Rothman is chairman of Fox Filmed
Entertainment. News Corporation also owns the New York Post and TV
Guide, and both are published under Chernin's supervision. The primary
printed neoconservative journal, The Weekly Standard, is also
published by News Corporation and edited by William Kristol, a leading
Jewish neocon spokesman and "intellectual."
Most of the television and movie production companies that are not
owned by the large media corporations are also controlled by Jews.
For example, Spyglass, an "independent" film producer which has made
such films as The Sixth Sense, The Insider, and Shanghai Noon, is
controlled by its Jewish founders Gary Barber and Roger Birnbaum, who
are co-chairmen. Jonathan Glickman serves as president and Paul
Neinstein is executive vice president. Both men are Jews. Spyglass
makes movies exclusively for DreamWorks SKG.
The best known of the smaller media companies, DreamWorks SKG, is a
strictly kosher affair. DreamWorks was formed in 1994 amid great media
hype by recording industry mogul David Geffen, former Disney Pictures
chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg, and film director Steven Spielberg, all
three of whom are Jews. The company produces movies, animated films,
television programs, and recorded music. Considering the cash and
connections that Geffen, Katzenberg, and Spielberg have, DreamWorks
may soon be in the same league as the big four.
One major studio, Columbia Pictures, is owned by the Japanese
multinational firm Sony. Nevertheless, the studio's chairman is Jewess
Amy Pascal, and its output fully reflects the Jewish social agenda.
Sony's music division recently merged with European music giant BMG to
form Sony BMG Music Entertainment, now one of the world's largest
music distributors. It is headed by CEO Andrew Lack, formerly
president and CEO of NBC-and a Jew. Sony's overall American operations
are headed by a Jew named Howard Stringer, formerly of CBS, who hired
Lack.
It is well known that Jews have controlled most of the production and
distribution of films since shortly after the inception of the movie
industry in the early decades of the 20th century. When Walt Disney
died in 1966, the last barrier to the total Jewish domination of
Hollywood was gone, and Jews were able to grab ownership of the
company that Walt built. Since then they have had everything their way
in the movie industry.
Films produced by seven of the firms mentioned above-Disney, Warner
Brothers, Paramount (Viacom), Universal (NBC Universal), 20th Century
Fox (News Corp.), DreamWorks, and Columbia (Sony)-accounted for 94% of
total box-office receipts for the year 2003.
The big three in television network broadcasting used to be ABC, CBS,
and NBC. With the consolidation of the media empires, these three are
no longer independent entities. While they were independent, however,
each was controlled by a Jew since its inception: ABC by Leonard
Goldenson; NBC first by David Sarnoff and then by his son Robert; and
CBS first by William Paley and then by Laurence Tisch. Over several
decades these networks were staffed from top to bottom with Jews, and
the essential Jewishness of network television did not change when the
networks were absorbed by other Jewish-dominated media corporations.
The Jewish presence in television news remains particularly strong.
NBC provides a good example of this. The president of NBC News is Neal
Shapiro. Jeff Zucker is NBC Universal Television Group president.
Reporting directly to Zucker is his close friend Jonathan Wald,
formerly an NBC program producer, now a senior consultant for CNBC.
David M. Zaslav is president of NBC Cable (and also a director of
digital video firm TiVo Inc.). The president of MSNBC is Rick Kaplan.
All of these men are Jews.
A similar preponderance of Jews exists in the news divisions of the
other networks. Sumner Redstone, Tom Freston, and Les Moonves control
Viacom's CBS. Moonves demonstrated his power in 2002 by replacing the
entire staff of the new CBS Early Show. He is also a great-nephew of
Zionist leader David Ben-Gurion, Israel's first prime minister. Al
Ortiz (also a Jew) is executive producer and director of special
events coverage for CBS News. Senior executive producer Michael Bass
and Victor Neufeld (formerly producer of ABC's 20/20) produce the CBS
Early Show; both are Jews.
At ABC, David Westin, who is a Jew according to Jeffrey Blankfort of
the Middle East Labor Bulletin, is the president of ABC News. The
senior vice president for news at ABC is Paul Slavin, also a Jew.
Bernard Gershon, a Jew, is senior vice president/general manager of
the ABC News Digital Media Group, in charge of ABCNEWS.com, ABC News
Productions, and ABC News Video Source.
The Print Media
After television news, daily newspapers are the most influential
information medium in America. About 58 million of them are sold (and
presumably read) each day. These millions are divided among some 1,456
different publications. One might conclude that the sheer number of
different newspapers across America would provide a safeguard against
minority control and distortion. Alas, such is not the case. There is
less independence, less competition, and much less representation of
majority interests than a casual observer would think.
In 1945, four out of five American newspapers were independently owned
and published by local people with close ties to their communities.
Those days, however, are gone. Most of the independent newspapers were
bought out or driven out of business by the mid-1970s. Today most
"local" newspapers are owned by a rather small number of large
companies controlled by executives who live and work hundreds or even
thousands of miles away. Today less than 20 percent of the country's
1,456 papers are independently owned; the rest belong to
multi-newspaper chains. Only 103 of the total number have circulations
of more than 100,000. Only a handful are large enough to maintain
independent reporting staffs outside their own communities; the rest
must depend on these few for all of their national and international
news.
The Associated Press (AP), which sells content to newspapers, is
currently under the control of its Jewish vice president and managing
editor, Michael Silverman, who directs the day-to-day news reporting
and supervises the editorial departments. Silverman had directed the
AP's national news as assistant managing editor, beginning in 1989.
Jewess Ann Levin is AP's national news editor. Silverman and Levin are
under Jonathan Wolman, also a Jew, who was promoted to senior vice
president of AP in November 2002.
In only two per cent of the cities in America is there more than one
daily newspaper, and competition is frequently nominal even among
them, as between morning and afternoon editions under the same
ownership or under joint operating agreements.
Much of the competition has disappeared through the monopolistic
tactics of the Jewish Newhouse family's holding company, Advance
Publications. Advance publications buys one of two competing
newspapers, and then starts an advertising war by slashing advertising
rates, which drives both papers to the edge of bankruptcy. Advance
Publications then steps in and buys the competing newspaper. Often
both papers continue: one as a morning paper and the other as an
evening paper. Eventually, though, one of the papers is closed-giving
the Newhouse brothers the only daily newspaper in that city. For
example, in 2001 the Newhouses closed the Syracuse Herald-Journal
leaving their other Syracuse newspaper, the Post-Journal, with a
monopoly.
The Newhouse media empire provides an example of more than the lack of
real competition among America's daily newspapers: it also illustrates
the insatiable appetite Jews have shown for all the organs of opinion
control on which they could fasten their grip. The Newhouses own 31
daily newspapers, including several large and important ones, such as
the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the Newark Star-Ledger, and the New
Orleans Times-Picayune; Newhouse Broadcasting, consisting of
television stations and cable operations; the Sunday supplement
Parade, with a circulation of more than 35 million copies per week;
some two dozen major magazines, including The New Yorker, Vogue,
Wired, Glamour, Vanity Fair, Bride's, Gentlemen's Quarterly, Self,
House & Garden, and all the other magazines of the wholly-owned Conde
Nast group. The staffing of the magazines is, as you might expect,
quite Kosher. Parade can serve as an example: Its publisher is Randy
Siegel, its editor and senior vice president is Lee Kravitz, its
creative director is Ira Yoffe, its science editor is David H. Levy,
and its health editor is Dr. Isadore Rosenfeld.
This Jewish media empire was founded by the late Samuel Newhouse, an
immigrant from Russia. When he died in 1979 at the age of 84, he
bequeathed media holdings worth an estimated $1.3 billion to his two
sons, Samuel and Donald. With a number of further acquisitions, the
net worth of Advance Publications has grown to more than $9 billion
today. The gobbling up of so many newspapers by the Newhouse family
was facilitated by newspapers' revenue structure. Newspapers, to a
large degree, are not supported by their subscribers but by their
advertisers. It is advertising revenue-not the small change collected
from a newspaper's readers-that largely pays the editor's salary and
yields the owner's profit. Whenever the large advertisers in a city
choose to favor one newspaper over another with their business, the
favored newspaper will flourish while its competitor dies. Since the
beginning of the last century, when Jewish mercantile power in America
became a dominant economic force, there has been a steady rise in the
number of American newspapers in Jewish hands, accompanied by a steady
decline in the number of competing Gentile newspapers-to some extent a
result of selective advertising policies by Jewish merchants.
Furthermore, even those newspapers still under Gentile ownership and
management are so thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising revenue
that their editorial and news reporting policies are largely
constrained by Jewish likes and dislikes. It holds true in the
newspaper business as elsewhere that he who pays the piper calls the
tune.
Three Jewish Newspapers
The suppression of competition and the establishment of local
monopolies on the dissemination of news and opinion have characterized
the rise of Jewish control over America's newspapers. The resulting
ability of the Jews to use the press as an unopposed instrument of
Jewish policy could hardly be better illustrated than by the examples
of the nation's three most prestigious and influential newspapers: the
New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post.
These three, dominating America's financial and political capitals,
are the newspapers that set the trends and the guidelines for nearly
all the others. They are the ones that decide what is news and what
isn't at the national and international levels. They originate the
news; the others merely copy it. And all three newspapers are in
Jewish hands.
The New York Times, with a 2003 circulation of 1,119,000, is the
unofficial social, fashion, entertainment, political, and cultural
guide of the nation. It tells America's "smart set" which books to buy
and which films to see; which opinions are in style at the moment;
which politicians, educators, spiritual leaders, artists, and
businessmen are the real comers. And for a few decades in the 19th
century it was a genuinely American newspaper.
The New York Times was founded in 1851 by two Gentiles, Henry J.
Raymond and George Jones. After their deaths, it was purchased in 1896
from Jones's estate by a wealthy Jewish publisher, Adolph Ochs. His
great-great-grandson, Arthur Sulzberger, Jr., is the paper's current
publisher and the chairman of the New York Times Co. Russell T. Lewis,
also a Jew, is president and chief executive officer of The New York
Times Company. Michael Golden, another Jew, is vice chairman. Martin
Nisenholtz, a Jew, runs their massive Internet operations.
The Sulzberger family also owns, through the New York Times Co., 33
other newspapers, including the Boston Globe, purchased in June 1993
for $1.1 billion; eight TV and two radio broadcasting stations; and
more than 40 news-oriented Web operations. It also publishes the
International Herald Tribune, the most widely distributed
English-language daily in the world. The New York Times News Service
transmits news stories, features, and photographs from the New York
Times by wire to 506 other newspapers, news agencies, and magazines.
Of similar national importance is the Washington Post, which, by
establishing its "leaks" throughout government agencies in Washington,
has an inside track on news involving the Federal government.
The Washington Post, like the New York Times, had a non-Jewish origin.
It was established in 1877 by Stilson Hutchins, purchased from him in
1905 by John R. McLean, and later inherited by Edward B. McLean. In
June 1933, however, at the height of the Great Depression, the
newspaper was forced into bankruptcy. It was purchased at a bankruptcy
auction by Eugene Meyer, a Jewish financier and former partner of the
infamous Bernard Baruch, a Jew who was industry czar in America during
the First World War. The Washington Post was run by Katherine Meyer
Graham, Eugene Meyer's daughter, until her death in 2001. She was the
principal stockholder and board chairman of the Washington Post
Company; and she appointed her son, Donald Graham, publisher of the
paper in 1979. Donald became Washington Post Company CEO in 1991 and
its board chairman in 1993, and the chain of Jewish control at the
Post remains unbroken. The newspaper has a daily circulation of
732,000, and its Sunday edition sells over one million copies.
The Washington Post Company has a number of other media holdings in
newspapers (the Gazette Newspapers, including 11 military
publications); in television (WDIV in Detroit, KPRC in Houston, WPLG
in Miami, WKMG in Orlando, KSAT in San Antonio, WJXT in Jacksonville);
and in magazines, most notably the nation's number-two weekly
newsmagazine, Newsweek.
The Washington Post Company's various television ventures reach a
total of about 12 million homes, and its cable TV service, Cable One,
has 750,000 subscribers.
The Wall Street Journal sells 1,820,000 copies each weekday and is
owned by Dow Jones & Company, Inc., a New York corporation that also
publishes 33 other newspapers and the weekly financial tabloid
Barron's. The chairman and CEO of Dow Jones is Peter R. Kann, who is a
Jew. Kann also holds the posts of chairman and publisher of the Wall
Street Journal.
Most of New York's other major newspapers are in no better hands than
the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. In January 1993 the
New York Daily News (circulation 729,000) was bought from the estate
of the late Jewish media mogul Robert Maxwell (born Ludvik Hoch) by
Jewish real-estate developer Mortimer B. Zuckerman. Another Jew, Les
Goodstein, is the president and chief operating officer of the New
York Daily News. And, as mentioned above, the neocon-slanted New York
Post (circulation 652,000) is owned by News Corporation under the
supervision of Jew Peter Chernin.
News Magazines
The story is much the same for other media as it is for television,
radio, films, music, and newspapers. Consider, for example,
newsmagazines. There are only three of any importance published in the
United States: Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News & World Report.
Time, with a weekly circulation of 4.1 million, is published by a
subsidiary of Time Warner Communications, the news media conglomerate
formed by the 1989 merger of Time, Inc., with Warner Communications.
The editor-in-chief of Time Warner Communication is Norman Pearlstine,
a Jew.
Newsweek, as mentioned above, is published by the Washington Post
Company, under the Jew Donald Graham. Its weekly circulation is 3.2
million.
U=2ES. News & World Report, with a weekly circulation of 2.0 million,
is owned and published by the aforementioned Mortimer B. Zuckerman,
who also has taken the position of editor-in-chief of the magazine for
himself. Zuckerman also owns New York's tabloid newspaper, the Daily
News, which is the sixth-largest paper in the nation.
Our Responsibility
Those are the facts of media control in America. Anyone willing to
spend a few hours in a large library looking into current editions of
yearbooks on the radio and television industries and into directories
of newspapers and magazines; into registers of corporations and their
officers, such as those published by Standard and Poors and by Dun and
Bradstreet; and into standard biographical reference works can verify
their accuracy. They are undeniable. When confronted with these facts,
Jewish spokesmen customarily will use evasive tactics. "Ted Turner
isn't a Jew!" they will announce triumphantly, as if that settled the
issue. If pressed further they will accuse the confronter of
"anti-Semitism" for even raising the subject. It is fear of this
accusation that keeps many persons who know the facts silent.
But we must not remain silent on this most important of issues. The
Jewish control of the American mass media is the single most important
fact of life, not just in America, but in the whole world today. There
is nothing-plague, famine, economic collapse, even nuclear war-more
dangerous to the future of our people.
Jewish media control determines the foreign policy of the United
States and permits Jewish interests rather than American interests to
decide questions of war and peace. Without Jewish media control, there
would have been no Persian Gulf war, for example. There would have
been no NATO massacre of Serb civilians. There would have been no Iraq
War, and thousands of lives would have been saved. There would have
been little, if any, American support for the Zionist state of Israel,
and the hatreds, feuds, and terror of the Middle East would never have
been brought to our shores.
By permitting the Jews to control our news and entertainment media we
are doing more than merely giving them a decisive influence on our
political system and virtual control of our government; we also are
giving them control of the minds and souls of our children, whose
attitudes and ideas are shaped more by Jewish television and Jewish
films than by parents, schools, or any other influence.
The Jew-controlled entertainment media have taken the lead in
persuading a whole generation that homosexuality is a normal and
acceptable way of life; that there is nothing at all wrong with White
women dating or marrying Black men, or with White men marrying Asian
women; that all races are inherently equal in ability and
character-except that the character of the White race is suspect
because of a history of oppressing other races; and that any effort by
Whites at racial self-preservation is reprehensible.
We must oppose the further spreading of this poison among our people,
and we must break the power of those who are spreading it. It would be
intolerable for such power to be in the hands of any alien minority
with values and interests different from our own. But to permit the
Jews, with their 3,000-year history of nation-wrecking, from ancient
Egypt to Russia, to hold such power over us is tantamount to race
suicide. Indeed, the fact that so many White Americans today are so
filled with a sense of racial guilt and self-hatred that they actively
seek the death of their own race is a deliberate consequence of Jewish
media control.
Once we have absorbed and understood the fact of Jewish media control,
it is our inescapable responsibility to do whatever is necessary to
break that control. We must shrink from nothing in combating this evil
power that has fastened its deadly grip on our people and is injecting
its lethal poison into our people's minds and souls. If our race fails
to destroy it, it certainly will destroy our race.
Topaz
FORTY-FIVE years ago, I witnessed an atrocity: the deliberate
starvation of German POWs by our own army. History, written by the
victors, suppressed all news of this atrocity until James Bacque, a
Canadian author, published his brilliant expose, OTHER LOSSES. This
book is a best seller in Canada, a sensation in Europe, yet is
virtually unavailable (censored?) in the U.S. Our major booksellers
told me their distributors are not handling it. When I prevailed upon
a small, independent bookstore to order direct from Canada, the
publisher told them they would be the only store in New York State to
carry the book. This in 'the land of the free'?"
Fortunately, Pat Buchanan called attention to OTHER LOSSES in his
January 10, 1990 column. He wrote:
"Conclusion: the U.S. Army killed ten times as many Germans in POW
camps as we did on battlefields from Normandy to V.E. day. (German
POWs) had their rations cut below survival level until they were
dying
at rates up to 30% of exposure, starvation and neglect... Red Cross
food trains were turned back and U.S. food shipments sat on the
docks...One French officer said the U.S. camps reminded him of Dachau
and Buchenwald...The book blames Eisenhower. 'The German is a beast,'
Ike had written... But that was not how the Canadians and British
felt, who treated their prisoners justly...It was not the view of
General Mark Clark, nor of Patton...Ignoring the book is not enough."
Pat Buchanan's courageous column inspired me to help end the cover-up
of the atrocity I had witnessed. I wrote letters to several
newspapers
which were, of necessity, short and incomplete. Now I would like to
finally free more of my painful memories, hoping to be heard, so that
this will help us to acknowledge our share in the "banality of evil",
cleansing ourselves with the truth. Perhaps we as a nation may then
put this behind us with some integrity and with some hope for
redemption.
In October 1944, at age eighteen, I was drafted into the army while a
student at the NYS College of Forestry. Largely due to the "Battle of
the Bulge", my training was cut short, my furlough cut in half, and I
was then immediately sent overseas. Upon arrival in Le Havre, France,
we were quickly loaded into boxcars and shipped to the front. By the
time we reached it, I had developed mononucleosis severely enough to
be sent to a hospital in Belgium.
By the time I left the hospital, the unit I had trained with in
Spartenburg, South Carolina was so deeply into Germany that I warn
placed in a "repo depo" (a replacement depot) despite my protests. I
then lost interest in which units I was assigned to because
non-combat
units were generally not respected. My separation qualification
record
states that I served mostly with the 14th Infantry Regiment, during
which time I guarded prisoners of war and served as an interpreter.
During my seventeen month stay in Germany, I was transferred to other
outfits also.
In late March or early April 1945, I was assigned to help guard a POW
camp near Andernach along the Rhine. I had four years of high school
German, so I was able to talk to the prisoners, although this was
forbidden.
Gradually, however, I was used as an interpreter and asked to ferret
out the S.S. (I found none.)
In Andernach, between 50,000 and 65,000 prisoners, ranging in age
from
very young teens to very old men, were crowded together in an open
field surrounded by barbed wire. The women were kept in a separate
enclosure which I did not see until later. The men I guarded had no
tents or other shelter, no blankets and many had no coats. Inadequate
numbers of slit trenches were provided for excrement, and so the men
lived and slept in the mud and increasing filth during a cold, wet
spring. Their misery from exposure alone was evident.
It was even more shocking to see them eating grass, sometimes
throwing
it into a tin can containing a thin soup. They told me they did this
hoping to ease their hunger pains. Soon their emaciation was evident.
Dysentery raged and, too weak and crowded to reach the slit trenches,
they were increasingly sleeping in excrement. I saw no sign of
provision for water, so the thin soup was their food and water for
the
day. Some days there was bread, less than a slice each. Other days
there was nothing.
The sight of so many men desperate for food and water, sickening and
dying before our eyes, is indescribable. Even now, I can only think
of
it momentarily.
We had ample food and supplies that could have been shared more
humanely, and we could have offered some medical assistance, but did
nothing. Only the dead were quickly and efficiently taken care of:
hauled away to mass graves.
My outrage reached the point that I protested to my officers, but I
was met with hostility or bland indifference. When pressed, they
explained they were under strict orders from "higher up". No officer
would dare to systematically do this to over 50,000 prisoners if he
felt he was violating general policy and subject to court martial.
The
term "war criminal" was just beginning to come into fashion.
Realizing my protests were useless, I asked a friend working in the
kitchen if he could slip me some extra food for the prisoners. He too
repeated that they were under strict orders to severely ration the
prisoners' food, and that these orders came from "higher up". But he
said they had more food than they knew what to do with and would
sneak
me some.
When I threw this food over the barbed wires to the prisoners I was
caught and threatened with imprisonment. I repeated the "offense",
and
one officer threatened to shoot me. I naturally assumed this was a
bluff, but I began to have some doubts after I encountered a captain
on a hill above the Rhine shooting down at a group of German civilian
women with his .45 caliber pistol. When I asked, "Why?" he mumbled,
"Target practice," and fired until his pistol was empty. I saw the
women running for cover, but, at that distance, couldn't tell if any
had been hit.
This is when I more fully realized I was dealing with some cold-
blooded killers filled with moralistic hatred. They considered the
Germans sub-human and worthy of extermination; another expression of
the downward spiral of racism. Articles in the G.I. newspaper, Stars
&
Stripes, played up the Nazi concentration camps, complete with
photographs of emaciated bodies; this amplified our self-righteous
cruelty and made it easier to imitate behavior we were supposed to
oppose. Also, I think, soldiers not exposed to combat were trying to
prove how tough they were by taking it out on the prisoners and
civilians. At least, many combat soldiers told me later they would
not
have tolerated this, for they combined hatred with respect for a
courageous enemy.
The prisoners I spoke to were mostly simple farmers and workingmen,
as
ignorant, albeit nationalistic, as many of our own troops. I heard
many versions of "my country, right or wrong, my country," which we
still hear in our own country today.
As time went on, many of them lapsed into a Zombie-like state of
listlessness. Others, maddened by thirst, tried to escape in a
desperate or suicidal fashion, running through open fields in broad
daylight towards the Rhine to quench their thirst. They were mowed
down.
Some prisoners were extremely eager for cigarettes, saying they took
the edge off their hunger. Accordingly, some enterprising G.I.
"Yankee
traders" were acquiring hordes of wrist watches and rings in exchange
for handfuls of cigarettes or less. When I began throwing cartons of
cigar-ettes to the prisoners to ruin this trade, I found myself
threatened by rank-and-file G.I.s also. At least this taught me an
indelible lesson: how wrong majorities and authorities can be.
A bright spot in this gloomy picture came, oddly enough, one night
when I was put on the "graveyard shift", from two to four A.M.
Actually, there was a graveyard on the uphill side of this enclosure,
not many yards away. My superiors had forgotten to give me a
flashlight and I hadn't bothered to ask, being disgusted with the
whole situation by that time. It was a fairly bright night and I soon
became aware of a prisoner crawling under the wires to the graveyard.
We were supposed to shoot escapees on sight, so I started to get up
to
warn him to get back. Suddenly I noticed another prisoner crawling
from the graveyard back to the enclosure. They were risking their
lives to get to the graveyard for something; I had to investigate.
When I entered the gloom of this shrubby, tree-shaded cemetery, I
never felt more vulnerable, but somehow curiosity kept me going.
Despite my caution, I tripped over the legs of someone in a prone
position. Whipping my rifle around while stumbling and trying to
regain composure of mind and body, I soon was relieved I hadn't
reflexively fired. The figure sat up, moving erratically. Gradually I
could see the beautiful but terror-stricken face of a woman with a
picnic basket nearby. German civilians were not allowed to feed, nor
even come near, the prisoners, so I quickly assured her I approved of
what she was doing, not to be afraid, and that I would leave the
graveyard to get out of the way, telling no one.
I left the graveyard as quickly as possible and sat down, leaning
against a tree at the edge CF the cemetary to be inconspicuous and
not
frighten the prisoners. I imagined then, and often since, what it
would be like to be a prisoner under those conditions and meet a
beautiful woman with a picnic basket. I never saw her again, but I
have never forgotten her face.
While I watched, more prisoners crawled to and from the enclosure. I
saw they were dragging food back to their comrades and could only
admire their courage and devotion. As I walked back to my quarters at
the end of my shift, a nightingale and I were singing -- both felt a
touch of spring.
(I originally did not intend to reveal the following incident, for it
moves into a realm termed "mystical". However, for me, it was an
extremely significant experience, changing my life, providing a light
no darkness can extinguish. It must be told, hoping it will foster
understanding.)
On May 8, V.E. day, I decided to celebrate with some prisoners I was
guarding who were baking bread, meager amounts of which the other
prisoners occasionally received. This group had all the bread they
could eat, and shared the jovial mood generated by the end of the
war.
We all thought we would be going home soon, a pathetic hope on their
part. We were in what was to become the French zone, and I later
witnessed the brutality of the French soldiers when we transferred
our
prisoners to them for their slave labor camps (see below).
However, on this day we were happy.
After chatting with them about the potentials of peace for the rest
of
our lives, I decided to risk a gesture of trust that objectively
would
seem foolish. I emptied my rifle and stood it in the corner. They
tested me further by asking to play with it, and I agreed.
Intuitively
I felt I could rely on their sense of honor not to attack me, for
they
knew they too were being tested. This thoroughly 'broke the ice', and
soon we were singing songs we taught each other or I had learned in
high school German ("Du, du, liegst mir im Herzen"). Out of
gratitude,
they secretly baked a small sweet bread and insisted I take it,
explaining it was the only possible gift they had left to offer.
Expressing my gratitude with a lump in my throat, I put it in my
tight
"Eisenhower jacket" so I could sneak it back to my barracks. I later
found an opportunity to eat it outside.
Never had bread tasted more delicious, nor conveyed to me a deeper
sense of communion while eating it. A wonderful feeling pervaded me,
gently opening me to an intimation of the Oneness of all Being.
Through those prisoners I sensed the ~cosmic presence of what has
been
called the Christ, Buddha-nature, or, perhaps most aptly, the
Ineffable: cosmically present, but hidden and apparently separate,
until revealed in the wholeness of the giving of the self. Even
within
the horror humans had created, I was taught a path to redemption may
open by taking a first, tentative step in the direction of love,
understanding and forgiveness. This above all the prisoners taught
me:
not only are we all potentially humane humans, there is divinity
within us waiting for us to dissolve the defensive shield of ego. I
was pleased to discover later the words of Matthew 25:34-46,
expressing the potential within prisoners and all who are at our
mercy.
Shortly after this experience I was plunged into even greater horror.
Some of our weak and sickly prisoners were being marched off by
French
soldiers to their camp. The truck we were on first passed another
truck picking up bodies along the side of the road, and then came up
behind a slowly moving column of men. Temporarily we slowed down and
remained behind, perhaps because the driver was as shocked as I was.
The French soldiers were apparently incensed at the poor condition of
our prisoners, not only for labor but for marching to another camp.
Whenever a prisoner staggered or dropped back, the French clubbed him
to death and then dragged him to the side of the road. For many, this
quick death might have been preferable to their prolonged suffering.
Even gas would have been more merciful than our murder by neglect in
our slow 'killing fields'...
Martin Brech
(Adjunct Professor,
Philosophy & Religion,
Mercy College;
Ex-G.I., Finally Free)
Topaz
Obviously losing the war didn't prove they were wrong. It only proved
they were outnumbered. Hitler made Germany great. Of course the Jew
parasites couldn't stand that. Unfortunately the bad side won the war.
Compare the size of Germany to the size of the Jewish controlled
countries, the USA and the USSR.
An article by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, January 21, 1945
The Creators of the World's Misfortunes
by Joseph Goebbels
One could not understand this war if one did not always keep in mind
the fact that International Jewry stands behind all the unnatural
forces that our united enemies use to attempt to deceive the world and
keep humanity in the dark. It is so to speak the mortar that holds the
enemy coalition firmly together, despite its differences of class,
ideology and interests. Capitalism and Bolshevism have the same Jewish
roots, two branches of the same tree that in the end bear the same
fruit. International Jewry uses both in its own way to suppress the
nations and keep them in its service. How deep its influence on public
opinion is in all the enemy countries and many neutral nations is
plain to see that it may never be named in newspapers, speeches and
radio broadcasts. There is a law in the Soviet Union that punishes
anti-Semitism - or in plain English, public education about the Jewish
Question - by death. The expert in these matters is in no way
surprised that a leading spokesman for the Kremlin said over the New
Year that the Soviet Union would not rest until this law was valid
throughout the world. In other words, the enemy clearly says that its
goal in this war is to put the total domination of Jewry over the
nations of the earth under legal protection, and to threaten even a
discussion of this shameful attempt with the death penalty.
It is little different in the plutocratic nations. There the struggle
against the impudent usurpation of the Jewish race is not punished by
the executioner, rather by death through economic and social boycott
and by intellectual terror. This has the same effect in the end.
Stalin, Churchill and Roosevelt were made by the Jewry. They enjoy its
full support and reward it with their full protection. They present
themselves in their speeches as upright men of civil courage, yet one
never hears even a word against the Jews, even though there is growing
hatred among their people as a result of this war, a hatred that is
fully justified. Jewry is a tabu theme in the enemy countries. It
stands outside every legal boundary and thus becomes the tyrant of its
host peoples. While enemy soldiers fight, bleed and die at the front,
the Jews make money from their sacrifice on the stock exchanges and
black markets. If a brave man dares to step forward and accuse the
Jews of their crimes, he will be mocked and spat on by their press,
chased from his job or otherwise impoverished, and be brought into
public contempt. Even that is apparently not enough for the Jews. They
want to bring Soviet conditions to the whole world: to give Jewry
absolute power and freedom from prosecution. He who objects or even
debates the matter gets a bullet in the back of his head or an axe
through his neck. There is no worse tyranny than this. This is the
epitome of the public and secret disgrace that Jewry inflicts on the
nations that deserve freedom.
That is all long behind us. Yet it still threatens us in the distance.
We have, it is true, entirely broken the power of the Jews in the
Reich, but they have not given up. They did not rest until they had
mobilized the whole world against us. Since they could no longer
conquer Germany from within, they want to try it from without. Every
Russian, English and American soldier is a mercenary of this world
conspiracy of a parasitic race. Given the current state of the war,
who could still believe that they are fighting and dying at the front
for the national interests of their countries! The nations want a
decent peace, but the Jews are against it. They know that the end of
the war would mean the dawning knowledge of humanity of the unhealthy
role that International Jewry played in preparing for and carrying out
this war. They fear being unmasked, which has in fact become
unavoidable and must inevitably come, just as the day follows the
night. That explains their raging bursts of hatred against us, which
are only the result of their fear and their feelings of inferiority.
They are too eager, and that makes them suspicious. International
Jewry will not succeed in turning this war to its advantage. Things
are already too far along. The hour will come in which all the peoples
of the earth will awake, and the Jews will be the victims. Here too
things can only go so far.
It is an old, often-used method of International Jewry to discredit
education and knowledge about its corrupting nature and drives,
thereby depending on the weaknesses of those people who easily confuse
cause with effect. The Jews are also masters at manipulating public
opinion, which they dominate through their network of news agencies
and press concerns that reaches throughout the world. The pitiful
illusion of a free press is one of the methods they use to stupefy the
publics of enemy lands. If the enemy press is as free as it pretends
to be, let it take an open position, for or against, on the Jewish
Question. It will not do that because it cannot and may not do so. The
Jews love to mock and criticize everything except themselves, although
everyone knows that they are most in need of public criticism. This is
where the so-called freedom of the press in enemy countries ends.
Newspapers, parliaments, statesmen and church leaders must be silent
here. Crimes and vices, filth and corruption are covered by the
blanket of love. The Jews have total control of public opinion in
enemy countries, and he who has that is also master of all of public
life. Only the nations that have to accept such a condition are to be
pitied. The Jews mislead them into believing that the German nation is
backward. Our alleged backwardness is actually proof of our progress.
We have recognized the Jews as a national and international danger,
and from this knowledge have drawn compelling conclusions. This German
knowledge will become the knowledge of he world at the end of this
war. We think it our primary duty to do everything in our power to
make that happen.
Humanity would sink into eternal darkness, it would fall into a dull
and primitive state, were the Jews to win this war. They are the
incarnation of that destructive force that in these terrible years has
guided the enemy war leadership in a fight against all that we see as
noble, beautiful and worth keeping. For that reason alone the Jews
hate it. They despite our culture and learning, which they perceive as
towering over their nomadic worldview. They fear our economic and
social standards, which leave no room for their parasitic drives, They
are the enemy of our domestic order, which has excluded their
anarchistic tendencies. Germany is the first nation in the world that
is entirely free of the Jews. That is the prime cause of its political
and economic balance. Since their expulsion from the German national
body has made it impossible for them to shake this balance from
within, they lead the nations they have deceived in battle against us
from without. It is fine with them, in fact it is part of their plan,
that Europe in the process will lose a large part of its cultural
values. The Jews had no part in their creation. They do not understand
them. A deep racial instinct tells them that since these heights of
human creative activity are forever out of their reach, they must
attack them today with hatred. The day is not distant when the nations
of Europe, yes, even those of the whole world, will shout: The Jews
are guilty for all our misfortunes! They must be called to account,
and soon and thoroughly!
International Jewry is ready with its alibi. Just as during the great
reckoning in Germany, they will attempt to look innocent and say that
one needs a scapegoat, and they are it. But that will no longer help
them, just as it did not help them during the National Socialist
revolution, The proof of their historical guilt, in details large and
small, is so plain that they can no longer be denied even with the
most clever lies and hypocrisy.
Who is it that drives the Russians, the English and the Americans into
battle and sacrifices huge numbers of human lives in a hopeless
struggle against the German people? The Jews! Their newspapers and
radio broadcasts spread the songs of war while the nations they have
deceived are led to the slaughter. Who is it that invents new plans of
hatred and destruction against us every day, making this war into a
dreadful case of self-mutilation and self-destruction of European life
and its economy, education and culture? The Jews! Who devised the
unnatural marriage between England and the USA on one side and
Bolshevism on the other, building it up and jealously ensuring its
continuance? Who covers the most perverse political situations with
cynical hypocrisy from a trembling fear that a new way could lead the
nations to realize the true causes of this terrible human catastrophe?
The Jews, only the Jews! They are named Morgenthau and Lehmann and
stand behind Roosevelt as a so-called brain trust. They are named
Mechett and Sasoon and serve as Churchill's money bags and order
givers. They are named Kaganovitsch and Ehrenburg and are Stalin's
pacesetters and intellectual spokesmen. Wherever you look, you see
Jews. They march as political commisars behind the Red army and
organize murder and terror in the areas conquered by the Soviets. They
sit behind the lines in Paris and Brussels, Rome and Athens, and
fashion their reins from the skin of the unhappy nations that have
fallen under their power.
That is the truth. It can no longer be denied, particularly since in
their drunken joy of power and victory the Jews have forgotten their
ordinarily so carefully maintained reserve and now stand in the
spotlight of public opinion. They no longer bother, apparently
believing that it is no longer necessary, that their hour has come.
And this is their mistake, which they always make when think
themselves near their great goal of anonymous world domination.
Thoughout the history of the nations, whenever this tragic situation
developed, a good providence saw to it that the Jews themselves became
the grave diggers of their own hopes. They did not destroy the healthy
peoples, rather the sting of their parasitic effects brought the
realization of the looming danger to the forefront and led to the
greatest sacrifices to overcome it. At a certain point, they become
that power that always wants evil but creates good. It will be that
way this time too.
The fact that the German nation was the first on earth to recognize
this danger and expel it from its organism is proof of its healthy
instincts. It therefore became the leader of a world struggle whose
results will determine of fate and the future of International Jewry.
We view with complete calm the wild Old Testament tirades of hatred
and revenge of Jews throughout the world against us. They are only
proof that we are on the right path. They cannot unsettle us. We gaze
on them with sovereign contempt and remember that these outbursts of
hate and revenge were everyday events for us in Germany until that
fateful day for International Jewry, 30 January 1933, when the world
revolution against the Jews that threateend not only Germany, but all
the other nations, began.
It will not cease before it has reached its goal. The truth can not be
stopped by lies or force. It will get through. The Jews will meet
their Cannae at the end of this war. Not Europe, rather they will
lose. They may laugh at this prophecy today, but they have laughed so
often in the past, and almost as often they stopped laughing sooner or
later. Not only do we know precisely what we want, we also know
precisely what we do not want. The deceived nations of he Earth may
still lack the knowledge they need, but we will bring it to them. How
will the Jews stop that in the long run? They believe their power
rests on sure foundations, but it stands on feet of clay. One hard
blow and it will collapse, burying the creators of the misfortunes of
the world in its ruins.
Michael Ejercito
> Obviously losing the war didn't prove they were wrong. It only proved
> they were outnumbered. Hitler made Germany great. Of course the Jew
> parasites couldn't stand that. Unfortunately the bad side won the war.
> Compare the size of Germany to the size of the Jewish controlled
> countries, the USA and the USSR.
>
> An article by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, January 21, 1945
A nithing who murdered his children.
> The Creators of the World's Misfortunes
> by Joseph Goebbels
>
Age of consent laws are your misfortune.
Topaz
By Mark Weber
Much has already been written about Roosevelt's campaign of deception
and outright lies in getting the United States to intervene in the
Second World War prior to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in
December 1941. Roosevelt's aid to Britain and the Soviet Union in
violation of American neutrality and international law, his acts of
war against Germany in the Atlantic in an effort to provoke a German
declaration of war against the United States, his authorization of a
vast "dirty tricks" campaign against U.S. citizens by British
intelligence agents in violation of the Constitution, and his
provocations and ultimatums against Japan which brought on the attack
against Pearl Harbor-all this is extensively documented and reasonably
well known.[1]
Not so well known is the story of Roosevelt's enormous responsibility
for the outbreak of the Second World War itself. This essay focuses on
Roosevelt's secret campaign to provoke war in Europe prior to the
outbreak of hostilities in September 1939. It deals particularly with
his efforts to pressure Britain, France and Poland into war against
Germany in 1938 and 1939.
Franklin Roosevelt not only criminally involved America in a war which
had already engulfed Europe. He bears a grave responsibility before
history for the outbreak of the most destructive war of all time.
This paper relies heavily on a little-known collection of secret
Polish documents which fell into German hands when Warsaw was captured
in September 1939.
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v04/v04p135_Weber.html
These documents clearly establish Roosevelt's crucial role in bringing
on the Second World War.
Poland had refused to even negotiate over self-determination for the
German city of Danzig and the ethnic German minority in the so-called
Polish Corridor. Hitler felt compelled to resort to arms when he did
in response to a growing Polish campaign of terror and dispossession
against the one and a half million ethnic Germans under Polish rule.
In my view, if ever a military action was justified, it was the German
campaign against Poland in 1939.
Poland's headstrong refusal to negotiate was made possible because of
a fateful blank check guarantee of military backing from Britain-a
pledge that ultimately proved completely worthless to the hapless
Poles. Considering the lightning swiftness of the victorious German
campaign, it is difficult to realize today that the Polish government
did not at all fear war with Germany. Poland's leaders foolishly
believed that German might was only an illusion. They were convinced
that their troops would occupy Berlin itself within a few weeks and
add further German territories to an enlarged Polish state. It is also
important to keep in mind that the purely localized conflict between
Germany and Poland was only transformed into a Europe-wide
conflagration by the British and French declarations of war against
Germany.
On 9 February 1938, the Polish Ambassador in Washington, Count Jerzy
Potocki, reported to the Foreign Minister in Warsaw on the Jewish role
in making American foreign policy:
The pressure of the Jews on President Roosevelt and on the State
Department is becoming ever more powerful ...
... The Jews are right now the leaders in creating a war psychosis
which would plunge the entire world into war and bring about general
catastrophe. This mood is becoming more and more apparent.
in their definition of democratic states, the Jews have also created
real chaos: they have mixed together the idea of democracy and
communism and have above all raised the banner of burning hatred
against Nazism.
This hatred has become a frenzy. It is propagated everywhere and by
every means: in theaters, in the cinema, and in the press. The Germans
are portrayed as a nation living under the arrogance of Hitler which
wants to conquer the whole world and drown all of humanity in an ocean
of blood.
In conversations with Jewish press representatives I have repeatedly
come up against the inexorable and convinced view that war is
inevitable. This international Jewry exploits every means of
propaganda to oppose any tendency towards any kind of consolidation
and understanding between nations. In this way, the conviction is
growing steadily but surely in public opinion here that the Germans
and their satellites, in the form of fascism, are enemies who must be
subdued by the 'democratic world.'
Ambassador Potocki's report from Washington of 9 January 1939 dealt in
large part with President Roosevelt's annual address to Congress:
President Roosevelt acts on the assumption that the dictatorial
governments, above all Germany and Japan, only understand a policy of
force. Therefore he has decided to react to any future blows by
matching them. This has been demonstrated by the most recent measures
of the United States.
The American public is subject to an ever more alarming propaganda
which is under Jewish influence and continuously conjures up the
specter of the danger of war. Because of this the Americans have
strongly altered their views on foreign policy problems, in comparison
with last year.
Of all the documents in this collection, the most revealing is
probably the secret report by Ambassador Potocki of 12 January 1939
which dealt with the domestic situation in the United States. This
report is given here in full:
The feeling now prevailing in the United States is marked by a growing
hatred of Fascism and, above all, of Chancellor Hitler and everything
connected with Nazism. Propaganda is mostly in the hands of the Jews
who control almost 100 percent radio, film, daily and periodical
press. Although this propaganda is extremely coarse and presents
Germany as black as possible-above all religious persecution and
concentration camps are exploited-this propaganda is nevertheless
extremely effective since the public here is completely ignorant and
knows nothing of the situation in Europe...
It is interesting to note that in this extremely well-planned campaign
which is conducted above all against National Socialism, Soviet Russia
is almost completely excluded. If mentioned at all, it is only in a
friendly manner and things are presented in such a way as if Soviet
Russia were working with the bloc of democratic states. Thanks to the
clever propaganda the sympathy of the American public is completely on
the side of Red Spain.
Besides this propaganda, a war psychosis is being artificially
created. The American people are told that peace in Europe is hanging
only by a thread and that war is unavoidable. At the same time the
American people are unequivocally told that in case of a world war,
America must also take an active part in order to defend the slogans
of freedom and democracy in the world.
These groups of people who occupy the highest positions in the
American government and want to pose as representatives of 'true
Americanism' and 'defenders of democracy' are, in the last analysis,
connected by unbreakable ties with international Jewry.
For this Jewish international, which above all is concerned with the
interests of its race, to portray the President of the United States
as the 'idealist' champion on human rights was a very clever move. In
this manner they have created a dangerous hotbed for hatred and
hostility in this hemisphere and divided the world into two hostile
camps. The entire issue is worked out in a masterly manner. Roosevelt
has been given the foundation for activating American foreign policy,
and simultaneously has been procuring enormous military stocks for the
coming war, for which the Jews are striving very consciously. With
regard to domestic policy, it is very convenient to divert public
attention from anti-Semitism, which is constantly growing in the
United States, by talking about the necessity of defending religion
and individual liberty against the onslaught of Fascism.
On 16 January 1939, Polish Ambassador Potocki reported to the Warsaw
Foreign Ministry on another lengthy conversation he had with
Roosevelt's personal envoy, William Bullitt
1. The vitalizing of foreign policy under the leadership of President
Roosevelt, who severely and unambiguously condemns totalitarian
countries.
2. United States preparations for war on sea, land and air will be
carried out at an accelerated pace and will consume the colossal sum
of 1.25 billion dollars.
3. It is the decided opinion of the President that France and Britain
must put an end to any sort of compromise with the totalitarian
countries. They must not get into any discussions aiming at any kind
of territorial changes.
4. They have the moral assurance that the United States will abandon
the policy of isolation and be prepared to intervene actively on the
side of Britain and France in case of war. America is ready to place
its whole wealth of money and raw materials at their disposal.
The Polish Ambassador to Paris, Juliusz (Jules) Lukasiewicz, sent a
top secret report to the Foreign Ministry in Warsaw at the beginning
of February 1939 which outlined U.S. policy towards Europe as
explained to him by William Bullitt:
A week ago, the Ambassador of the United States, William Bullitt
returned to Paris after a three months' leave in America. Meanwhile, I
have had two conversations with him which enable me to inform you of
his views regarding the European situation and to give a survey of
Washington's policy.
The international situation is regarded by official circles as
extremely serious and in constant danger of armed conflict. Those in
authority are of the opinion that if war should break out between
Britain and France on the one hand, and Germany and Italy on the
other, and should Britain and France be defeated, the Germans would
endanger the real interests of the United States on the American
continent. For this reason, one can foresee right from the beginning
the participation of the United States in the war on the side of
France and Britain, naturally some time after the outbreak of the war.
As Ambassador Bullitt expressed it: 'Should war break out we shall
certainly not take part in it at the beginning, but we shall finish
it.'
On 7 March 1939, Ambassador Potocki sent a remarkably lucid and
perceptive report on Roosevelt's foreign policy to his government in
Warsaw. This document was first made public when leading German
newspapers published it in German translation, along with a facsimile
reproduction of the first page of the Polish original, in their
editions of 28 October 1940. The main National Socialist party
newspaper, the Voelkischer Beobachter, published the Ambassador's
report with this observation:
The document itself needs no commentary. We do not know, and it does
not concern us, whether the internal American situation as reported by
the Polish diplomat is correct in every detail. That must be decided
by the American people alone. But in the interest of historical truth
it is important for us to show that the warmongering activities of
American diplomacy, especially in Europe, are once again revealed and
proven by this document. It still remains a secret just who, and for
what motives, have driven American diplomacy to this course. In any
case, the results have been disastrous for both Europe and America.
Europe was plunged into war and America has brought upon itself the
hostility of great nations which normally have no differences with the
American people and, indeed, have not been in conflict but have lived
for generations as friends and want to remain so...
While the Polish documents alone are conclusive proof of Roosevelt's
treacherous campaign to bring about world war, it is fortunate for
posterity that a substantial body of irrefutable complementary
evidence exists which confirms the conspiracy recorded in the
dispatches to Warsaw...
On 19 September 1938 -- that is, a year before the outbreak of war in
Europe-Roosevelt called Lindsay to a very secret meeting at the White
House. At the beginning of their long conversation, according to
Lindsay's confidential dispatch to London, Roosevelt "emphasized the
necessity of absolute secrecy. Nobody must know I had seen him and he
himself would tell nobody of the interview. I gathered not even the
State Department." The two discussed some secondary matters before
Roosevelt got to the main point of the conference. "This is the very
secret part of his communication and it must not be known to anyone
that he has even breathed a suggestion." The President told the
Ambassador that if news of the conversation was ever made public, it
could mean his impeachment. And no wonder. What Roosevelt proposed was
a cynically brazen but harebrained scheme to violate the U.S.
Constitution and dupe the American people.
The President said that if Britain and France "would find themselves
forced to war" against Germany, the United States would ultimately
also join. But this would require some clever maneuvering. Britain and
France should impose a total blockade against Germany without actually
declaring war and force other states (including neutrals) to abide by
it. This would certainly provoke some kind of German military
response, but it would also free Britain and France from having to
actually declare war. For propaganda purposes, the "blockade must be
based on loftiest humanitarian grounds and on the desire to wage
hostilities with minimum of suffering and the least possible loss of
life and property, and yet bring the enemy to his knees." Roosevelt
conceded that this would involve aerial bombardment, but "bombing from
the air was not the method of hostilities which caused really great
loss of life."
The important point was to "call it defensive measures or anything
plausible but avoid actual declaration of war." That way, Roosevelt
believed he could talk the American people into supporting war against
Germany, including shipments of weapons to Britain and France, by
insisting that the United States was still technically neutral in a
non-declared conflict. "This method of conducting war by blockade
would in his [Roosevelt's] opinion meet with approval of the United
States if its humanitarian purpose were strongly emphasized," Lindsay
reported.[19]
The American Ambassador to Italy, William Phillips, admitted in his
postwar memoirs that the Roosevelt administration was already
committed to going to war on the side of Britain and France in late
1938. "On this and many other occasions," Phillips wrote, "I would
like to have told him [Count Ciano, the Italian Foreign Minister]
frankly that in the event of a European war, the United States would
undoubtedly be involved on the side of the Allies. But in view of my
official position, I could not properly make such a statement without
instructions from Washington, and these I never received."[20]
The fateful British pledge to Poland of 31 March 1939 to go to war
against Germany in case of a Polish-German conflict would not have
been made without strong pressure from the White House
In their nationally syndicated column of 14 April 1939, the usually
very well informed Washington journalists Drew Pearson and Robert S.
Allen reported that on 16 March 1939 Roosevelt had "sent a virtual
ultimatum to Chamberlain" demanding that henceforth the British
government strongly oppose Germany. According to Pearson and Allen,
who completely supported Roosevelt's move, "the President warned that
Britain could expect no more support, moral or material through the
sale of airplanes, if the Munich policy continued."[22] Chamberlain
gave in and the next day, 17 March, ended Britain's policy of
cooperation with Germany in a speech at Birmingham bitterly denouncing
Hitler. Two weeks later the British government formally pledged itself
to war in case of German-Polish hostilities.
In a confidential telegram to Washington dated 9 April 1939, Bullitt
reported from Paris on another conversation with Ambassador
Lukasiewicz. He had told the Polish envoy that although U.S. law
prohibited direct financial aid to Poland, it might be possible to
circumvent its provisions. The Roosevelt administration might be able
to supply war planes to Poland indirectly through Britain. "The Polish
Ambassador asked me if it might not be possible for Poland to obtain
financial help and aeroplanes from the United States. I replied that I
believed the Johnson Act would forbid any loans from the United States
to Poland but added that it might be possible for England to purchase
planes for cash in the United States and turn them over to
Poland."[24]
On 25 April 1939, four months before the outbreak of war, Bullitt
called American newspaper columnist Karl von Wiegand, chief European
correspondent of the International News Service, to the U.S. embassy
in Paris and told him: "War in Europe has been decided upon. Poland
has the assurance of the support of Britain and France, and will yield
to no demands from Germany. America will be in the war soon after
Britain and France enter it."[25]
In a lengthy secret conversation at Hyde Park on 28 May 1939,
Roosevelt assured the former President of Czechoslovakia, Dr. Edvard
Benes, that America would actively intervene on the side of Britain
and France in the anticipated European war.[26]
In June 1939, Roosevelt secretly proposed to the British that the
United States should establish "a patrol over the waters of the
Western Atlantic with a view to denying them to the German Navy in the
event of war." The British Foreign Office record of this offer noted
that "although the proposal was vague and woolly and open to certain
objections, we assented informally as the patrol was to be operated in
our interests."[27]
Many years after the war, Georges Bonnet, the French Foreign Minister
in 1939, confirmed Bullitt's role as Roosevelt's deputy in pushing his
country into war. In a letter to Hamilton Fish dated 26 March 1971,
Bonnet wrote: "One thing is certain is that Bullitt in 1939 did
everything he could to make France enter the war."[28] An important
confirmation of the crucial role of Roosevelt and the Jews in pushing
Britain into war comes from the diary of James V. Forrestal, the first
U.S. Secretary of Defense. In his entry for 27 December 1945, he
wrote:
Played golf today with [former Ambassador] Joe Kennedy. I asked him
about his conversations with Roosevelt and [British Prime Minister]
Neville Chamberlain from 1938 on. He said Chamberlain's position in
1938 was that England had nothing with which to fight and that she
could not risk going to war with Hitler. Kennedy's view: That Hitler
would have fought Russia without any later conflict with England if it
had not been for [William] Bullitt's urging on Roosevelt in the summer
of 1939 that the Germans must be faced down about Poland; neither the
French nor the British would have made Poland a cause of war if it had
not been for the constant needling from Washington. Bullitt, he said,
kept telling Roosevelt that the Germans wouldn't fight; Kennedy that
they would, and that they would overrun Europe. Chamberlain, he says,
stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into the
war. In his telephone conversations with Roosevelt in the summer of
1939, the President kept telling him to put some iron up Chamberlain's
backside.[29]
"In the West," the Ambassador told Szembek, "there are all kinds of
elements openly pushing for war: the Jews, the super-capitalists, the
arms dealers. Today they are all ready for a great business, because
they have found a place which can be set on fire: Danzig; and a nation
that is ready to fight: Poland. They want to do business on our backs.
They are indifferent to the destruction of our country. Indeed, since
everything will have to be rebuilt later on, they can profit from that
as well."[30]
On 24 August 1939, just a week before the outbreak of hostilities,
Chamberlain's closest advisor, Sir Horace Wilson, went to Ambassador
Kennedy with an urgent appeal from the British Prime Minister for
President Roosevelt. Regretting that Britain had unequivocally
obligated itself in March to Poland in case of war, Chamberlain now
turned in despair to Roosevelt as a last hope for peace. He wanted the
American President to "put pressure on the Poles" to change course at
this late hour and open negotiations with Germany. By telephone
Kennedy told the State Department that the British "felt that they
could not, given their obligations, do anything of this sort but that
we could." Presented with this extraordinary opportunity to possibly
save the peace of Europe, Roosevelt rejected Chamberlain's desperate
plea out of hand. At that, Kennedy reported, the Prime Minister lost
all hope. "The futility of it all," Chamberlain had told Kennedy, "is
the thing that is frightful. After all, we cannot save the Poles. We
can merely carry on a war of revenge that will mean the destruction of
all Europe."[31]
But Roosevelt rejected out of hand this chance to save the peace of
Europe. To a close political crony, he called Kennedy's plea "the
silliest message to me that I have ever received." He complained to
Henry Morgenthau that his London Ambassador was nothing but a pain in
the neck: "Joe has been an appeaser and will always be an appeaser ...
If Germany and Italy made a good peace offer tomorrow, Joe would start
working on the King and his friend the Queen and from there on down to
get everybody to accept it."[33]
Infuriated at Kennedy's stubborn efforts to restore peace in Europe or
at least limit the conflict that had broken out, Roosevelt instructed
his Ambassador with a "personal" and "strictly confidential" telegram
on 11 September 1939 that any American peace effort was totally out of
the question. The Roosevelt government, it declared, "sees no
opportunity nor occasion for any peace move to be initiated by the
President of the United States. The people [sic] of the United States
would not support any move for peace initiated by this Government that
would consolidate or make possible a survival of a regime of force and
aggression."[34]
In the months before armed conflict broke out in Europe, perhaps the
most vigorous and prophetic American voice of warning against
President Roosevelt's campaign to incite war was that of Hamilton
Fish, a leading Republican congressman from New York. In a series of
hard-hitting radio speeches, Fish rallied considerable public opinion
against Roosevelt's deceptive war policy. Here are only a few excerpts
from some of those addresses.[35]
On 6 January 1939, Fish told a nationwide radio audience:
The inflammatory and provocative message of the President to Congress
and the world [given two days before] has unnecessarily alarmed the
American people and created, together with a barrage of propaganda
emanating from high New Deal officials, a war hysteria, dangerous to
the peace of America and the world. The only logical conclusion to
such speeches is another war fought overseas by American soldiers.
All the totalitarian nations referred to by President Roosevelt ...
haven't the faintest thought of making war on us or invading Latin
America.
I do not propose to mince words on such an issue, affecting the life,
liberty and happiness of our people. The time has come to call a halt
to the warmongers of the New Deal, backed by war profiteers,
Communists, and hysterical internationalists, who want us to
quarantine the world with American blood and money.
He [Roosevelt] evidently desires to whip up a frenzy of hate and war
psychosis as a red herring to take the minds of our people off their
own unsolved domestic problems. He visualizes hobgoblins and creates
in the public mind a fear of foreign invasions that exists only in his
own imagination.
On 5 March, Fish spoke to the country over the Columbia radio network:
The people of France and Great Britain want peace but our warmongers
are constantly inciting them to disregard the Munich Pact and resort
to the arbitrament of arms. If only we would stop meddling in foreign
lands the old nations of Europe would compose their own quarrels by
arbitration and the processes of peace, but apparently we won't let
them.
Fish addressed the listeners of the National Broadcasting Company
network on 5 April with these words:
The youth of America are again being prepared for another blood bath
in Europe in order to make the world safe for democracy.
If Hitler and the Nazi government regain Memel or Danzig, taken away
from Germany by the Versailles Treaty, and where the population is 90
percent German, why is it necessary to issue threats and denunciations
and incite our people to war? I would not sacrifice the life of one
American soldier for a half dozen Memels or Danzigs. We repudiated the
Versailles Treaty because it was based on greed and hatred, and as
long as its inequalities and injustices exist there are bound to be
wars of liberation.
The sooner certain provisions of the Versailles Treaty are scrapped
the better for the peace of the world.
I believe that if the areas that are distinctly German in population
are restored to Germany, except Alsace-Lorraine and the Tyrol, there
will be no war in western Europe. There may be a war between the Nazis
and the Communists, but if there is that is not our war or that of
Great Britain or France or any of the democracies.
New Deal spokesmen have stirred up war hysteria into a veritable
frenzy. The New Deal propaganda machine is working overtime to prepare
the minds of our people for war, who are already suffering from a bad
case of war jitters.
President Roosevelt is the number one warmonger in America, and is
largely responsible for the fear that pervades the Nation which has
given the stock market and the American people a bad case of the
jitters.
I accuse the administration of instigating war propaganda and hysteria
to cover up the failure and collapse of the New Deal policies, with 12
million unemployed and business confidence destroyed.
I believe we have far more to fear from our enemies from within than
we have from without. All the Communists are united in urging us to go
to war against Germany and Japan for the benefit of Soviet Russia.
Great Britain still expects every American to do her duty, by
preserving the British Empire and her colonies. The war profiteers,
munitions makers and international bankers are all set up for our
participation in a new world war.
On 21 April, Fish again spoke to the country over nationwide radio:
It is the duty of all those Americans who desire to keep out of
foreign entanglements and the rotten mess and war madness of Europe
and Asia to openly expose the war hysteria and propaganda that is
impelling us to armed conflict.
What we need in America is a stop war crusade, before we are forced
into a foreign war by internationalists and interventionists at
Washington, who seem to be more interested in solving world problems
rather than our own.
In his radio address of 26 May, Fish stated:
He [Roosevelt] should remember that the Congress has the sole power to
declare war and formulate the foreign policies of the United States.
The President has no such constitutional power. He is merely the
official organ to carry out the policies determined by the Congress.
Without knowing even who the combatants will be, we are informed
almost daily by the internationalists and interventionists in America
that we must participate in the next world war.
On 8 July 1939, Fish declared over the National Broadcasting Company
radio network:
If we must go to war, let it be in defense of America, but not in
defense of the munitions makers, war profiteers, Communists, to cover
up the failures of the New Deal, or to provide an alibi for a third
term.
It is well for all nations to know that we do not propose to go to war
over Danzig, power politics, foreign colonies, or the imperialistic
wars of Europe or anywhere in the world.
President Roosevelt could have done little to incite war in Europe
without help from powerful allies. Behind him stood the self-serving
international financial and Jewish interests bent on the destruction
of Germany. The principal organization which drummed up public support
for U.S. involvement in the European war prior to the Pearl Harbor
attack was the cleverly named "Committee to Defend America by Aiding
the Allies." President Roosevelt himself initiated its founding, and
top administration officials consulted frequently with Committee
leaders.[36]
Although headed for a time by an elderly small-town Kansas newspaper
publisher, William Allen White, the Committee was actually organized
by powerful financial interests which stood to profit tremendously
from loans to embattled Britain and from shrewd investments in giant
war industries in the United States.
At the end of 1940, West Virginia Senator Rush D. Holt issued a
detailed examination of the Committee which exposed the base interests
behind the idealistic-sounding slogans:
The Committee has powerful connections with banks, insurance
companies, financial investing firms, and industrial concerns. These
in turn exert influence on college presidents and professors, as well
as on newspapers, radio and other means of communication. One of the
powerful influences used by the group is the '400' and social set. The
story is a sordid picture of betrayal of public interest.
The powerful J.P. Morgan interest with its holdings in the British
Empire helped plan the organization and donated its first expense
money.
Some of the important figures active in the Committee were revealed by
Holt: Frederic R. Coudert, a paid war propagandist for the British
government in the U.S. during the First World War; Robert S. Allen of
the Pearson and Allen syndicated column; Henry R. Luce, the
influential publisher of Time, Life, and Fortune magazines; Fiorella
LaGuardia, the fiery half-Jewish Mayor of Now York City; Herbert
Lehman, the Jewish Governor of New York with important financial
holdings in war industries; and Frank Altschul, an officer in the
Jewish investment firm of Lazard Freres with extensive holdings in
munitions and military supply companies.
If the Committee succeeded in getting the U.S. into war, Holt warned,
"American boys will spill their blood for profiteers, politicians and
'paytriots.' If war comes, on the hands of the sponsors of the White
Committee will be blood-the blood of Americans killed in a needless
war."[37]
In March 1941 a list of most of the Committee's financial backers was
made public. It revealed the nature of the forces eager to bring
America into the European war. Powerful international banking
interests were well represented. J.P. Morgan, John W. Morgan, Thomas
W. Lamont and others of the great Morgan banking house were listed.
Other important names from the New York financial world included Mr.
and Mrs. Paul Mellon, Felix M. and James F. Warburg, and J. Malcolm
Forbes. Chicago department store owner and publisher Marshall Field
was a contributor, as was William Averill Harriman, the railroad and
investment millionaire who later served as Roosevelt's ambassador in
Moscow.
Of course, Jewish names made up a substantial portion of the long
list. Hollywood film czar Samuel Goldwyn of Goldwyn Studios was there,
along with David Dubinsky, the head of the International Ladies
Garment Workers Union. The William S. Paley Foundation, which had been
set up by the head of the giant Columbia Broadcasting System,
contributed to the Committee. The name of Mrs. Herbert H. Lehman, wife
of the New York Governor, was also on the list.[38]
Without an understanding of his intimate ties to organized Jewry,
Roosevelt's policies make little sense. As Jewish historian Lucy
Dawidowicz noted: "Roosevelt himself brought into his immediate circle
more Jews than any other President before or after him. Felix
Frankfurter, Bernard M. Baruch and Henry Morgenthau were his close
advisers. Benjamin V. Cohen, Samuel Rosenman and David K. Niles were
his friends and trusted aides."[39] This is perhaps not so remarkable
in light of Roosevelt's reportedly one-eighth Jewish ancestry.[40]
In his diary entry of 1 May 1941, Charles A. Lindbergh, the American
aviator hero and peace leader, nailed the coalition that was pushing
the United States into war:
The pressure for war is high and mounting. The people are opposed to
it, but the Administration seems to have 'the bit in its teeth' and
[is] hell-bent on its way to war. Most of the Jewish interests in the
country are behind war, and they control a huge part of our press and
radio and most of our motion pictures. There are also the
'intellectuals,' and the 'Anglophiles,' and the British agents who are
allowed free rein, the international financial interests, and many
others.[41]
Joseph Kennedy shared Lindbergh's apprehensions about Jewish power.
Before the outbreak of war he privately expressed concerns about "the
Jews who dominate our press" and world Jewry in general, which he
considered a threat to peace and prosperity. Shortly after the
beginning of hostilities, Kennedy lamented "the growing Jewish
influence in the press and in Washington demanding continuance of the
war "[42]
Roosevelt's efforts to get Poland, Britain and France into war against
Germany succeeded all too well. The result was untold death and misery
and destruction. When the fighting began, as Roosevelt had intended
and planned, the Polish and French leaders expected the American
president to at least make good on his assurances of backing in case
of war. But Roosevelt had not reckoned on the depth of peace sentiment
of the vast majority of Americans. So, in addition to deceiving his
own people, Roosevelt also let down those in Europe to whom he had
promised support.
Seldom in American history were the people as united in their views as
they were in late 1939 about staying out of war in Europe. When
hostilities began in September 1939, the Gallup poll showed 94 percent
of the American people against involvement in war. That figure rose to
96.5 percent in December before it began to decline slowly to about 80
percent in the Fall of 1941. (Today, there is hardly an issue that
even 60 or 70 percent of the people agree upon.)[43]
Roosevelt was, of course, quite aware of the intensity of popular
feeling on this issue. That is why he lied repeatedly to the American
people about his love of peace and his determination to keep the U.S.
out of war, while simultaneously doing everything in his power to
plunge Europe and America into war.
In a major 1940 re-election campaign speech, Roosevelt responded to
the growing fears of millions of Americans who suspected that their
President had secretly pledged United States support to Britain in its
war against Germany. These well-founded suspicions were based in part
on the publication in March of the captured Polish documents. The
speech of 23 October 1940 was broadcast from Philadelphia to the
nation on network radio. In the most emphatic language possible,
Roosevelt categorically denied that he had
pledged in some way the participation of the United States in some
foreign war. I give to you and to the people of this country this most
solemn assurance: There is no secret Treaty, no secret understanding
in any shape or form, direct or indirect, with any Government or any
other nation in any part of the world, to involve this nation in any
war or for any other purpose.[44]
We now know, of course, that this pious declaration was just another
one of Roosevelt's many brazen, bald-faced lies to the American
people.
Roosevelt's policies were more than just dishonest-they were criminal.
The Constitution of the United States grants authority only to the
Congress to make war and peace. And Congress had passed several major
laws to specifically insure U.S. neutrality in case of war in Europe.
Roosevelt continually violated his oath as President to uphold the
Constitution. If his secret policies had been known, the public demand
for his impeachment would very probably have been unstoppable.
The Watergate episode has made many Americans deeply conscious of the
fact that their presidents can act criminally. That affair forced
Richard Nixon to resign his presidency, and he is still widely
regarded as a criminal. No schools are named after him and his name
will never receive the respect that normally goes to every American
president. But Nixon's crimes pale into insignificance when compared
to those of Franklin Roosevelt. What were Nixon's lies compared to
those of Roosevelt? What is a burglary cover-up compared to an illegal
and secret campaign to bring about a major war?
Those who defend Roosevelt's record argue that he lied to the American
people for their own good-that he broke the law for lofty principles.
His deceit is considered permissible because the cause was noble,
while similar deception by presidents Johnson and Nixon, to name two,
is not. This is, of course, a hypocritical double standard. And the
argument doesn't speak very well for the democratic system. It implies
that the people are too dumb to understand their own best interests.
It further suggests that the best form of government is a kind of
benevolent liberal-democratic dictatorship.
Roosevelt's hatred for Hitler was deep, vehement, passionate-almost
personal. This was due in no small part to an abiding envy and
jealousy rooted in the great contrast between the two men, not only in
their personal characters but also in their records as national
leaders.
Superficially, the public fives of Roosevelt and Hitler were
astonishingly similar. Both assumed the leadership of their respective
countries at the beginning of 1933. They both faced the enormous
challenge of mass unemployment during a catastrophic worldwide
economic depression. Each became a powerful leader in a vast military
alliance during the most destructive war in history. Both men died
while still in office within a few weeks of each other in April 1945,
just before the end of the Second World War in Europe. But the
enormous contrasts in the lives of these two men are even more
remarkable.
Roosevelt was born into one of the wealthiest families in America. His
was a life utterly free of material worry. He took part in the First
World War from an office in Washington as UnderSecretary of the Navy.
Hitler, on the other hand, was born into a modest provinicial family.
As a young man he worked as an impoverished manual laborer. He served
in the First World War as a front line soldier in the hell of the
Western battleground. He was wounded many times and decorated for
bravery.
In spite of his charming manner and soothing rhetoric, Roosevelt
proved unable to master the great challenges facing America. Even
after four years of his presidency, millions remained unemployed,
undernourished and poorly housed in a vast land richly endowed with
all the resources for incomparable prosperity. The New Deal was
plagued with bitter strikes and bloody clashes between labor and
capital. Roosevelt did nothing to solve the country's deep, festering
racial problems which erupted repeatedly in riots and armed conflict.
The story was very different in Germany. Hitler rallied his people
behind a radical program that transformed Germany within a few years
from an economically ruined land on the edge of civil war into
Europe's powerhouse. Germany underwent a social, cultural and economic
rebirth without parallel in history. The contrast between the
personalities of Roosevelt and Hitler was simultaneously a contrast
between two diametrically different social-political systems and
ideologies.
And yet, it would be incorrect to characterize Roosevelt as merely a
cynical politician and front man for powerful alien interests.
Certainly he did not regard himself as an evil man. He sincerely
believed that he was doing the right and noble thing in pressuring
Britain and France into war against Germany. Like Wilson before him,
and others since, Roosevelt felt himself uniquely qualified and called
upon by destiny to reshape the world according to his vision of an
egalitarian, universalist democracy. He was convinced, as so many
American leaders have been, that the world could be saved from itself
by remodeling it after the United States.
Presidents like Wilson and Roosevelt view the world not as a complex
of different nations, races and cultures which must mutually respect
each others' separate collective identities in order to live together
in peace, but rather according to a selfrighteous missionary
perspective that divides the globe into morally good and evil
countries. In that scheme of things, America is the providentially
permanent leader of the forces of righteousness. Luckily, this view
just happens to correspond to the economic and political interests of
those who wield power in the United States.
President Roosevelt's War
In April 1941, Senator Gerald Nye of North Dakota prophetically
predicted that one day the Second World War would be remembered as
Roosevelt's war. "If we are ever involved in this war, it will be
called by future historians by only one title, 'the President's War,'
because every step of his since his Chicago quarantine speech [of 5
October 1937] has been toward war.[45]
The great American historian, Harry Elmer Barnes, believed that war
could probably have been prevented in 1939 if it had not been for
Roosevelt's meddling. "Indeed, there is fairly conclusive evidence
that, but for Mr. Roosevelt's pressure on Britain, France and Poland,
and his commitments to them before September 1939, especially to
Britain, and the irresponsible antics of his agent provocateur,
William C. Bullitt, there would probably have been no world war in
1939, or, perhaps, for many years thereafter."[46] In Revisionism: A
Key to Peace, Barnes wrote:
President Roosevelt had a major responsibility, both direct and
indirect, for the outbreak of war in Europe. He began to exert
pressure on France to stand up to Hitler as early as the German
reoccupation of the Rhineland in March 1936, months before he was
making his strongly isolationist speeches in the campaign of 1936.
This pressure on France, and also England, continued right down to the
coming of the war in September 1939. It gained volume and momentum
after the quarantine speech of October 1937. As the crisis approached
between Munich and the outbreak of war, Roosevelt pressed the Poles to
stand firm against any demands by Germany, and urged the English and
French to back up the Poles unflinchingly.
There is grave doubt that England would have gone to war in September
1939 had it not been for Roosevelt's encouragement and his assurances
that, in the event of war, the United States would enter on the side
of Britain just as soon as he could swing American public opinion
around to support intervention.
Roosevelt had abandoned all semblance of neutrality, even before war
broke out in 1939, and moved as speedily as was safe and feasible in
the face of anti-interventionist American public opinion to involve
this country in the European conflict.[47]
One of the most perceptive verdicts on Franklin Roosevelt's place in
history came from the pen of the great Swedish explorer and author,
Sven Hedin. During the war he wrote:
The question of the way it came to a new world war is not only to be
explained because of the foundation laid by the peace treaties of
1919, or in the suppression of Germany and her allies after the First
World War, or in the continuation of the ancient policies of Great
Britain and France. The decisive push came from the other side of the
Atlantic Ocean.
Roosevelt speaks of democracy and destroys it incessantly. He slanders
as undemocratic and un-American those who admonish him in the name of
peace and the preservation of the American way of life. He has made
democracy into a caricature rather than a model. He talks about
freedom of speech and silences those who don't hold his opinion.
He talks about freedom of religion and makes an alliance with
Bolshevism.
He talks about freedom from want, but cannot provide ten million of
his own people with work, bread or shelter. He talks about freedom
from the fear of war while working for war, not only for his own
people but for the world, by inciting his country against the Axis
powers when it might have united with them, and he thereby drove
millions to their deaths.
This war will go down in history as the war of President
Roosevelt.[48]
Officially orchestrated praise for Roosevelt as a great man of peace
cannot conceal forever his crucial role in pushing Europe into war in
1939.
It is now more than forty years since the events described here took
place. For many they are an irrelevant part of a best-forgotten past.
But the story of how Franklin Roosevelt engineered war in Europe is
very pertinent-particularly for Americans today. The lessons of the
past have never been more important than in this nuclear age. For
unless at least an aware minority understands how and why wars are
made, we will remain powerless to restrain the warmongers of our own
era.
Notes
1. See, for example: Charles A. Beard, President Roosevelt and
the Coming of the War 1941 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1948);
William Henry Chamberlin, America's Second Crusade (Chicago: Regnery,
1952, 1962); Benjamin Colby, 'Twas a Famous Victory (New Rochelle,
N.Y.: Arlington House, 1979); Frederic R. Sanborn, Design for War (New
York: Devin-Adair, 1951); William Stevenson, A Man Called Intrepid
(New York: Ballantine Books, 1980); Charles C. Tansill, Back Door to
War (Chicago: Regnery, 1952); John Toland, Infamy: Pearl Harbor and
Its Aftermath (New York: Doubleday, 1982).
2. Saul Friedlander, Prelude to Downfall: Hitler and the United
States 1939-1941 (New York: Knopf, 1967), pp. 73-77; U.S., Congress,
House, Special Committee on Investigation of Un-American Activities in
the United States, 1940, Appendix, Part II, pp. 1054-1059.
3. Friedlander, pp. 75-76.
4. New York Times, 30 March 1940, p. 1.
5. Ibid., p. 4, and 31 March 1940, p. 1.
6. New York Times, 30 March 1940, p. 1. Baltimore Sun, 30 March
1940, p. 1.
7. A French-language edition was published in 1944 under the
title Comment Roosevelt est Entre en Guerre.
8. Tansill, "The United States and the Road to War in Europe," in
Harry Elmer Barnes (ed.), Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace (Caldwell,
Idaho: Caxton, 1953; reprint eds., New York: Greenwood, 1969 and
Torrance, Calif.: Institute for Historical Review [supplemented],
1982), p. 184 (note 292). Tansill also quoted from several of the
documents in his Back Door to War, pp. 450-51.
9. Harry Elmer Barnes, The Court Historians Versus Revisionism
(N.p.: privately printed, 1952), p. 10. This booklet is reprinted in
Barnes, Selected Revisionist Pamphlets (New York: Arno Press & The New
York Times, 1972), and in Barnes, The Barnes Trilogy (Torrance,
Calif.: Institute for Historical Review, 1979).
10. Chamberlin, p. 60.
11. Edward Raczynski, In Allied London (London: Weidenfeld and
Nicolson, 1963), p. 51.
12. Orville H. Bullitt (ad.), For the President: Personal and
Secret (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972), p. x1v [biographical
foreword]. See also Time, 26 October 1936, p. 24.
13. Current Biography 1940, ed. Maxine Block (New York: H.W.
Wilson, 1940), p. 122 ff.
14. Gisleher Wirsing, Der masslose Kontinent: Roosevelts Kampf um
die Weltherrschaft (Jena: E. Diederichs, 1942), p. 224.
15. Bullitt obituary in New York Times, 16 February 1967, p. 44.
16. Jack Alexander, "He Rose From the Rich," Saturday Evening
Post, 11 March 1939, p. 6. (Also see continuation in issue of 18 March
1939.) Bullitt's public views on the European scene and what should be
America's attitude toward it can be found in his Report to the
American People (Boston: Houghton Mifflin [Cambridge: Riverside
Press], 1940), the text of a speech he delivered, with the President's
blessing, under the auspices of the American Philosophical Society in
Independence Hall in Philadelphia shortly after the fall of France.
For sheer, hyperventilated stridency and emotionalist hysterics, this
anti-German polemic could hardly be topped, even given the similar
propensities of many other interventionists in government and the
press in those days.
17. Michael R. Beschloss, Kennedy and Roosevelt (New York: Norton,
1980), pp. 203-04.
18. Robert Dallek, Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign
Policy 1932-1945 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1979), p. 31. See
also pp. 164-65.
19. Dispatch No. 349 of 20 September 1938 by Sir. R. Lindsay,
Documents on British Foreign Policy (ed. Ernest L. Woodward), Third
series, Vol. VII (London, 1954), pp. 627-29. See also: Joseph P. Lash,
Roosevelt and Churchill 1939-1941 (New York: Norton, 1976), pp. 25-27;
Dallek, pp. 164-65; Arnold A. Offner, America and the Ori-, gins of
World War II (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1971), p. 61.
20. William Phillips, Ventures in Diplomacy (North Beverly, Mass.:
privately published, 1952), pp. 220-21.
21. Carl Burckhardt, Meine Danziger Mission 1937-1939 (Munich:
Callwey, 1960), p. 225.
22. Drew Pearson and Robert S. Allen, "Washington Daily
Merry-Go-Round," Washington Times-Herald, 14 April 1939, p. 16. A
facsimile reprint of this column appears in Conrad Grieb (ed.),
American Manifest Destiny and The Holocausts (New York: Examiner
Books, 1979), pp. 132-33. See also: Wirsing, pp. 238-41.
23. Jay P. Moffat, The Moffat Papers 1919-1943 (Cambridge: Harvard
University Press, 1956), p. 232.
24. U.S., Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United
States (Diplomatic Papers), 1939, General, Vol. I (Washington: 1956),
p. 122.
25. "Von Wiegand Says-," Chicago Herald-American, 8 October 1944,
p. 2.
26. Edvard Benes, Memoirs of Dr. Eduard Benes (London: George
Allen & Unwin, 1954), pp. 79-80.
27. Lash, p. 64.
28. Hamilton Fish, FDR: The Other Side of the Coin (Now York:
Vantage, 1976; Torrance, Calif.: Institute for Historical Review,
1980), p. 62.
29. James V. Forrestal (ads. Walter Millis and E.S. Duffield), The
Forrestal Diaries (New York: Viking, 1951), pp. 121-22. I have been
privately informed by a colleague who has examined the original
manuscript of the Forrestal diaries that many very critical references
to the Jews were deleted from the published version.
30. Jan Szembek, Journal 1933-1939 (Paris: Plan, 1952), pp.
475-76.
31. David E. Koskoff, Joseph P. Kennedy: A Life and Times
(Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1974), p. 207; Moffat, p. 253;
A.J.P. Taylor, The Origins of the Second World War (London: Hamish
Hamilton, 1961; 2nd ed. Greenwich, Conn.: Fawcett Premier [paperback],
1965), p. 262; U.S., Department of State, Foreign Relations of the
United States, 1939, General, Vol. I (Washington: 1956), p. 355.
32. Dallek, p. 164.
33. Beschloss, pp. 190-91; Lash, p. 75; Koskoff, pp. 212-13.
34. Hull to Kennedy (No. 905), U.S., Department of State, Foreign
Relations of the United States, 1939, General, Vol. I (Washington:
1956), p. 424.
35. The radio addresses of Hamilton Fish quoted here were
published in the Congressional Record Appendix (Washington) as
follows: (6 January 1939) Vol. 84, Part 11, pp. 52-53; (5 March 1939)
same, pp. 846-47; (5 April 1939) Vol. 84, Part 12, pp. 1342-43; (21
April 1939) same, pp. 1642-43; (26 May 1939) Vol. 84, Part 13, pp.
2288-89; (8 July 1939) same, pp. 3127-28.
36. Wayne S. Cole, Charles A. Lindbergh and the Battle Against
American Intervention in World War II (New York: Harcourt Brace
Jovanovich, 1974), pp. 128, 136-39.
37. Congressional Record Appendix (Washington: 1941), (30 December
1940) Vol. 86, Part 18, pp. 7019-25. See also: Appendix, Vol. 86, Part
17, pp. 5808-14.
38. New York Times, 11 March 1941, p. 10.
39. Lucy Dawidowicz, "American Jews and the Holocaust," The New
York Times Magazine, 18 April 1982, p. 102.
40. "FDR 'had a Jewish great-grandmother'" Jewish Chronicle
(London), 5 February 1982, p. 3.
41. Charles A. Lindbergh, The Wartime Journals of Charles A.
Lindbergh (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1970), p. 481.
42. Koskoff, pp. 282, 212. The role of the American press in
fomenting hatred against Germany between 1933 and 1939 is a subject
that deserves much more detailed treatment. Charles Tansill provides
some useful information on this in Back Door to War. The essay by
Professor Hans A. Muenster, "Die Kriegsschuld der Presse der USA" in
Kriegsschuld und Presse, published in 1944 by the German
Reichsdozentenfuehrung, is worth consulting.
43. An excellent essay relating and contrasting American public
opinion measurements to Roosevelt's foreign policy moves in 1939-41 is
Harry Elmer Barnes, Was Roosevelt Pushed Into War By Popular Demand in
1941? (N.p.: privately printed, 1951). It is reprinted in Barnes,
Selected Revisionist Pamphlets.
44. Lash, p. 240.
45. New York Times, 27 April 1941, p. 19.
46. Harry Elmer Barnes, The Struggle Against the Historical
Blackout, 2nd ed. (N.p.: privately published, ca. 1948), p. 12. See
also the 9th, final revised and enlarged edition (N.p.: privately
published, ca. 1954), p. 34; this booklet is reprinted in Barnes,
Selected Revisionist Pamphlets.
47. Harry Elmer Barnes, "Revisionism: A Key to Peace," Rampart
Journal of Individualist Thought Vol. II, No. 1 (Spring 1966), pp.
29-30. This article was republished in Barnes, Revisionism: A Key to
Peace and Other Essays (San Francisco: Cato Institute [Cato Paper No.
12], 1980).
48. Sven Hedin, Amerika im Kampf der Kontinente (Leipzig: F.A.
Brockhaus, 1943), p. 54.
Bibliography
Listed here are the published editions of the Polish documents, the
most important sources touching on the questions of their authenticity
and content, and essential recent sources on what President Roosevelt
was really-as opposed to publicly-doing and thinking during the
prelude to war. Full citations for all references in the article will
be found in the notes.
Beschloss, Michael R. Kennedy and Roosevelt. New York: Norton, 1980.
Bullitt, Orville H. (ed.). For the President: Personal and Secret.
[Correspondence between Franklin D. Roosevelt and William C. Bullitt.]
Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972.
Germany. Foreign Office Archive Commission. Roosevelts Weg in den
Krieg: Geheimdokumente zur Kriegspolitik des Praesidenten der
Vereinigten Staaten. Berlin: Deutscher Verlag, 1943.
Germany. Foreign Office. The German White Paper. [White Book No. 3.]
New York: Howell, Soskin and Co., 1940.
Germany. Foreign Office. Polnische Dokumente zur Vorgeschichte des
Kriegs. [White Book No. 3.] Berlin: F. Eher, 1940.
Koskoff, David E. Joseph P. Kennedy: A Life and Times. Englewood
Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1974.
Lukasiewicz, Juliusz (Waclaw Jedrzejewicz, ed.). Diplomat in Paris
1936-1939. New York: Columbia University Press, 1970.
Wirsing, Giselher. Der masslose Kontinent: Roosevelts Kampf um die
Weltherrschaft. Jena: E. Diederichs, 1942.
Dave Heil
> By Mark Weber
>
> Much has already been written about Roosevelt's campaign of deception
Much has been written about your campaign of deception and outright
lies. Roosevelt was not a hate monger. You are. Roosevelt was
President of the strongest country on Earth. You can't even get elected
in any country on Earth. In fact, you can't even take over by force.
Go figure!
Topaz
wrote:
>
>Much has been written about your campaign of deception and outright
>lies. Roosevelt was not a hate monger. You are. Roosevelt was
>President of the strongest country on Earth. You can't even get elected
>in any country on Earth. In fact, you can't even take over by force.
>Go figure!
An article by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, November 30, 1941
Mr. Roosevelt Cross-Examined
by Joseph Goebbels
"On 28 October, more than a month ago, U.S. President Franklin D.
Roosevelt gave a radio speech which apparently had as its goal
plunging the American people into uncertainty and panic and thus to
prepare gradually for the fateful intervention which the American
president desires, regardless of American public opinion. The speech
differed from all of his previous speeches in that Roosevelt did not
limit himself to the almost traditional and unconscionable and
slanderous attacks on the F�hrer and National Socialist Germany. This
time he made concrete accusations against the policies of the Reich,
which he attempted to prove though compromising documents he allegedly
possessed.
Mr. Roosevelt claimed that he had proof in his hands that the Axis
powers were planning to reorganize South and Central America. They
were planning to transform the existing fourteen countries into five
states that would be under their control. His proof was a secret map
allegedly produced by the Reich government. The American government
also claims to possess another Reich document. According to it, the
Reich government plans, once it has won the war, to abolish the
existing religions of the world-Catholicism, Protestantism,
Mohammedism, Hinduism. Buddhism and Judaism. They are to be replaced
by an international National Socialist church, the cross by the
swastika and God by the F�hrer. That is what he claims.
It is clear to us that Mr. Roosevelt needed this grand swindle to whip
up American public opinion. He needed the heaviest possible
ammunition, since the American people are at the moment more
intelligent than their government and want absolutely nothing to do
with the war in Europe. We really are not all that interested in Mr.
Roosevelt's opinion of the intelligence of his people nor in what he
thinks them capable of believing, and normally would see no need to
reply to his bald-faced and outrageous lies which so clearly bear the
signs of fabrication. In this case, however, it is a matter of a
political falsification which seems to us to have a clear and ominous
purpose, and gave us such an easy chance to show up the liars to the
entire world that we could hardly let the opportunity pass. We had to
overcome our moral scruples, however, to confront the liar and ask him
where he got these alleged documents from, where they can be found,
and if he was ready to show them to the public.
Things went as we expected. Mr. Roosevelt, the president of a nation
of 130 million, dodged our questions. He claimed the authenticity of
the documents was unassailable; he had them. They could not be
published, however, since they were secret and publishing them would
reveal the source. And the map in question that carved up Central and
South America had markings in pencil which could compromise the source
that provided them. He, Roosevelt, did not want to cause any
difficulties for the poor chap who passed them along.
Would that we had such a president! He is a well-meaning soul who
cares for his scoundrels. Given his speeches and actions, he would not
hesitate to send hundreds of thousands of soldiers to the battlefield,
even perhaps sacrificing them in service to his crazy plans of
conquest, but the thought of causing a fine and honorable traitor any
trouble breaks his heart. As one can imagine, Roosevelt's answer was
not very convincing proof of his hair-raising allegations either at
home or abroad. Our tough questions bore fruit. We used the press and
radio to propose to the American president that he might publish the
incriminating map of Central and South America, perhaps either erasing
the ominous pencil markings or covering them up with paper, and to at
least publish the text of our notorious plan to begin a campaign
against all the world's religions once the war was over, from Jehovah
to Confucius to Christ.
Mr. Roosevelt sank into silence, saying nothing at all. Only one of
his creatures, the former Argentinean bordello-owner and pimp Taborda,
who happened to be visiting him at the time, said that he had been
able to sneak a look at the map, and that all was as Mr. Roosevelt
said. More he could not say, since he had given his word of honor.
One can understand our reluctance to consider the word of honor of so
dubious an underworld figure as absolutely convincing. We looked
further, and since we could learn nothing more given the stubborn
silence of the accuser, we attempted to lure him into a response by
massive attacks. Alas, the normally talkative gentleman seemed to have
forgotten how to speak. Even the attempts of the American press to
learn something more as he visited one of the famous skyscrapers were
in vain.
The Reich government published two formal denials on 1 November, which
boxed Roosevelt's ears so strongly that he had to chose between
revealing his documents or proving himself a forger and liar to the
entire world. He chose the latter. The U.S. press gave headline
treatment to the German denials and asked for a response. Mr.
Roosevelt accepted the blows, rubbed his checks and said nothing. We
made every conceivable suggestion to ease the publication of the
documents, but the U.S. president preferred to be thought a liar and
forger than to prove his absurd accusations.
That's the way things are. We do not flatter ourselves by believing
that we have some way to force Mr. Roosevelt to speak. He apparently
has every reason to hope the matter will be forgotten. When he made
his charges, one could perhaps generously grant that he believed them.
It was at least possible that he had been the victim of some sort of
swindle and had believed in the documents' authenticity. That is no
longer possible, for if he had been acting honestly he would have
provided the evidence supporting his accusations. He has not done so.
That is sufficient proof that he was not the victim of a forgery,
rather that he himself was directly or indirectly involved. This is a
matter of war and peace, and the American public has every right to
examine its president and his actions, to ask him about these
documents, why Mr. Roosevelt has not published them. whether he still
stands by his speech of 28 October, and what he plans to do to restore
the damage done to his reputation by the two German denials that
accuse him of forgery.
One always feels the need to wash one's hands after being forced to
deal with the methods of U.S. interventionism. It is so unpleasant and
filthy that one shudders. One hears the pious nonsense of the
Jewish-ruled world plutocracy over the radio or reads them in the
press, one need only to look behind the scenes to feel pity for the
miseries of mankind. That such a man has the impudence to judge us, to
call on God and the world as his witnesses of the purity of his deeds,
to incite war and send innocent people singing "Onward Christian
Soldiers" to battle for his filthy financial interests can only fill
anyone with even the most primitive sense of decency with the deepest
horror. Were there only such people in the world, one would have to
despise humanity..."
Dave Heil
> THERE IS NO GREATER POWER in the world today than that wielded by the
> manipulators of public opinion in America.
You are one who attempts to manipulate public opinion. You are a
spreader of hate, a teller of lies, a purveyor of falsehoods and a
defender of evil.
Luckily for the public, you aren't good at it. You spread tired, old,
stale canned text files which are so outdated that they are obvious.
When you are forced to use your own words, your language is stilted and
you have few words in your vocabulary.
There are times when I'm almost certain that you are a foreigner because
you don't seem to realize just how bad your language skills are.
Dave Heil
> Obviously losing the war didn't prove they were wrong.
War crimes trials and the revelations of the terrible atrocities
committed by the Nazis did that. The fact that Nazi Germany invaded her
neighbors did that.
> It only proved
> they were outnumbered.
...outproduced, outfought and out-thought.
> Hitler made Germany great.
If rubble, defeat and disgrace are great, he did that.
> Of course the Jew
> parasites couldn't stand that.
So Jews arranged for Hitler's defeat and disgrace?
> Unfortunately the bad side won the war.
It's hard to defend those who are universally loathed, isn't it, you
little hate pimp?
> Compare the size of Germany to the size of the Jewish controlled
> countries, the USA and the USSR.
I think Mr. Hitler and his pals should have done that.
Topaz
Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell big lies. The
Jewish media took his words out of context and claimed that Hitler was
in favor of big lies. This was in itself a big lie and proof that
Hitler was right. Here is what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf and in
context:
"But it remained for the Jews, with their unqualified capacity
for falsehood, and their fighting comrades, the Marxists, to impute
responsibility for the downfall precisely to the man who alone had
shown a superhuman will and energy in his effort to prevent the
catastrophe which he had foreseen and to save the nation from that
hour of complete overthrow and shame. By placing responsibility for
the loss of the world war on the shoulders of Ludendorff they took
away the weapon of moral right from the only adversary dangerous
enough to be likely to succeed in bringing the betrayers of the
Fatherland to justice. All this was inspired by the principle--which
is quite true in itself--that in the big lie there is always a certain
force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always
more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature
than consciously or voluntarily, and thus in the primitive simplicity
of their minds they are more readily fall victims to the big lie than
the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little
matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It
would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and
they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort
truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so
may be brought clearly to their minds, they still doubt and waver and
will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For
the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it
has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in
this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These
people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest
purposes.
"From time immemorial, however, the Jews have known better than
any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited. Is not their
very existence founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a
religious community, whereas in reality they are a race? And what a
race! One of the greatest thinkers that mankind has produced has
branded the Jews for all time with a statement which is profoundly and
exactly true. He (Schopenhauer) called the Jew 'The Great Master of
Lies'. Those who do not realize the truth of that statement, or do not
wish to believe it, will never be able to lend a hand in helping Truth
to prevail."
Topaz
Senator McCarthy, American Press, May 20th, 1949 (on Nuremberg trials)
"I have heard evidence and read documentary proofs to the effect that
the accused persons were beaten up, maltreated and physically tortured
by methods which could only be conceived by sick brains. They were
subjected to mock trials and pretended executions, they were told that
their families would be deprived of their ration cards. All these
things were carried out with the approval of the Public Prosecutor to
secure the psychological atmosphere necessary for the extortion of the
required confessions. If the United States lets such acts committed by
a few people go unpunished, then the whole world can rightly criticize
us severely and forever doubt the correctness of our motives and our
moral integrity."
John Q Public
And then commenced a period where US foreign policy was paramount around the
world when we ignored this asshole.
See what apologetic foreign policy gets ya, in da shit!
Dave Heil
> Senator McCarthy, American Press, May 20th, 1949 (on Nuremberg trials)
>
> "I have heard evidence and read documentary proofs to the effect that
> the accused persons were beaten up, maltreated and physically tortured
> by methods which could only be conceived by sick brains.
Senator McCarthy was censured by the Senate and drank himself to death.
Topaz
"We National Socialists have grown accustomed since our takeover in
1933 to the particular attention of the leading politicians of the
U.S.A. and of the international Jews who stand behind them. Our
defensive measures against international Jewry have aroused increasing
tirades against Germany in America. Sometimes it seemed as if it would
be impossible to increase the flood of hatred and lies...
After leading politicians such as the American Secretary of the
Interior Harold Ickes and Senator Pittman attacked the German
government in the foulest manner, President Roosevelt did even more in
his New Year address. He tried to persuade the American people that
world peace was not assured, and that it was the duty of the American
people to defend three vital principles: those of religion, democracy
and international good will. Roosevelt did not believe these
principles were threatened by Soviet Russia or Soviet Spain, rather by
authoritarian Germany and Italy.
Millions are dead in Soviet Russia and Spanish priests estimate that a
half million people have been murdered there only because of their
faith, but that is not important and proves nothing. The dead do not
trouble the American President's conscience, indeed they did not stop
him from being the single world statesman to congratulate the Soviet
Russian government on the anniversary of the Bolshevist Revolution. No
other statesman did this, which explains why no other statesman
received such praise from the Soviet press. The Soviet press praised
the "noble efforts of the great American statesman."
Roosevelt also ignored the murder of millions of people when it was
called to his attention by a letter from the former Spanish ambassador
in Great Britain, the Marquis de Merry del Wal. The ambassador told
Mr. Roosevelt the following:
Your country's press tells the world of Your Excellency's protests
against the "persecution of the Jews" in Germany. According to the
press, you are deeply distressed by these events. How is it then that
the murder and massacre of 400,000 defenseless men, women and children
in Spain has not resulted in the slightest distress on your part?
These unfortunate people did not die on the battlefields of a civil
war. They were torn from their homes and murdered in public not only
because of their political, but also their religious, beliefs. Their
murderers openly declared their goal of destroying the very
civilization that Your Excellency defends. They have intentionally
destroyed thousands of churches and monuments along with uncounted
works of art and private homes. They have torn the clothes from nuns
and revealed them to everyone's eyes. They raped women and looted to a
degree unknown in the annals of the Christian era.
Your own ambassador, Your Excellency, against all the laws, norms and
customs of international law, has been forced to live away from the
government to which he is accredited, since as he said his personal
security would otherwise be in danger. I further know, Your
Excellency, that you have received certain proof of my assertions, for
I have made efforts to ensure that you have received reports that
support what I have said. Despite that, Your Excellency, you complain
about events in Germany, events that cannot be compared with what is
happening in Spain-and you have not given even the slightest sign of
disapproval at the death of hundreds of thousands of people who have
18 million fellow believers who are among the best citizens of your
country, far more than the two million Jews.
These people have been murdered solely because of their beliefs. Mr.
Roosevelt however has never spoken of a threat to faith or religion.
But they were only believers in a Christian church, after all. Mr.
Roosevelt is conducting a crusade against the authoritarian states
under the banner of religion only because the religious compatriots of
his closest friends have been put in their place in the authoritarian
states.
If President Roosevelt believes that he has to take the field to
defend democracy, we may ask where and when we have ever threatened or
attacked democracy. In the past years Germany has done nothing more
than to partially undo the injustices inflicted on it by the
predecessor of the current president of the U.S.A. Germany has not
arbitrarily altered the map of Europe as he did, creating states
against the will of their peoples only for purposes of power politics.
It has only reclaimed its citizens who suffered a decade long under
governments foreign or hostile to Germany...
In a closed session, he told the Defense Committee of the Senate that
the United States must be ready to support England and France in the
event of a European war. The President reportedly even suggested that
definite agreements already existed to this effect. He further
proposed the unrestricted sale of war materials to Western Europe. The
only restriction was that they had to be able to pay for it. When a
member of the American Senate asked how this policy could be squared
with the law demanding strict neutrality over against Europe,
Roosevelt replied: "We'll cross that bridge when we come to it."
These revelations naturally were a sensation throughout the world. The
impact was greater than the master of the White House in Washington
wanted. He therefore denied the reports. The force of his denial was
somewhat weakened by excited reports in the American press in which
various members of Congress refused to be called liars, and
furthermore suggested that Roosevelt had said even more during the
session than has been reported. The force of the denial was also
weakened by a cynical article in a French newspaper that noted that
"the strength of the claim has not been weakened, for it is not a
matter of the letter of the law, but of the spirit."...
Roosevelt is acting as the mouthpiece and puppet of international
Jewry when he attacks the authoritarian states. They want to use every
means to destroy the newly awakened nations...
The leaders of the Soviet Union tried to persuade their people that
true communism could only develop after all the other states of the
world were allies of the powers in Moscow, and the Red rulers in
Soviet Spain tried and tried to conceal their governmental
incompetence by unleashing a world conflict. We are not surprised to
see the American President in such company. The real rulers of the
Soviet Union are the same as in the United States: international
Jewry.
The truth of this claim is confirmed by the behavior of the wife of
the American President. Mrs. Roosevelt, as a sign of her support for
the Spanish Bolshevist rulers, accepted a gift of stolen etchings by
Spanish masters. Mrs. Roosevelt chaired an exhibition of busts of
Spanish Communist leaders, made by the Jew Josef Davidson. She also
invited the well-known top Bolshevist Toller to lunch. She surrounds
herself with wounded bigwigs of Soviet Spain under whose orders
500,000 Spaniards were killed only because they were faithful to their
beliefs and their religion...
America today is not governed by men like Roosevelt, Ickes, etc.,
rather its fate is determined by the Jews who stand behind them, Jews
like Baruch, Frankfurter, Morgenthau, etc. They are the real rulers of
America, and Roosevelt, Ickes, etc., are only their tools. The fact
that this is known in America is evident from a variety of newspaper
articles. The "New York Daily News," for example, wrote that "the wave
of anti-Semitism in America has increased significantly in recent
weeks and months." The fact that the Jew Bernard Baruch, the
President's closest adviser, is called the unofficial president of the
United States is proof of this fact.
But enough of that. We refuse to interfere in the affairs of other
nations. We think that every country gets the Jews that it deserves.
But we demand the same principle be extended to us. Let Mr. Roosevelt
carry out his reforms and crusades in his own country. He will not
live long enough to do it all. We do not think we have yet seen
anything on the other side of the ocean that is worth imitating. We
think it not a sign of ability, rather of incompetence, that a nation
with such enormous resources and space, with all modern methods, finds
itself in such mass misery and is unable to do anything to alleviate
that misery.
Where would Roosevelt be if he had had to deal with the situation the
F�hrer faced when he took power in Germany? Mr. Roosevelt has
agricultural resources more than sufficient to feed the country, yet
his people are starving. His country has enormous resources, yet
millions are unemployed. There is only one conclusion to be drawn."
Topaz
"With the opening of the KGB archives and the release
of the VENONA intercepts - decoded Soviet KGB and GRU
traffic - it has been proved that McCarthy was
absolutely right about the extensive Soviet penetration
of the U.S. government in all the most sensitive
sections and its danger to America. According to the
KGB archives the NKVD had 221 agents in the Roosevelt
administration in April 1941 and the Soviet military
GRU probably had a like number. He was proved right
that the Communist Party, U.S.A., was an arm of the
Soviet intelligence apparatus and the Soviet Union
considered the US as their "main enemy." His liberal
critics in academe and the mainstream media, who denied
there was Communist subversion and made excuses for it,
were proved absolutely wrong! This should have
discredited the liberal ideology and those who mouthed
it. Because the left had no answer or effective reply
to the challenge McCarthy posed, they engaged in
personal destruction - they demonized McCarthy because
he was truth."
<http://history.freeyellow.com/mccarthy.htm>
<http://home.att.net/~r.s.mccain/mccarthy.html>
Dave Heil
> "We National Socialists have grown accustomed since our takeover in
> 1933 to the particular attention of the leading politicians of the
> U.S.A. and of the international Jews who stand behind them.
You National Socialists have also gotten used to the fact that twelve
years later your dream was shattered and the Third Reich ground into
rubble. You grew accustomed to having no power whatever.